I'd like to see if the Motorola X can outperform the Samsung Galaxy S4, using nbench.
Could someone with a Moto X run the nbench benchmark and post the results, here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1270596 preferably.
Nbench market link: http://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.drolez.nbench
Thanks.
Nate2 said:
I'd like to see if the Motorola X can outperform the Samsung Galaxy S4, using nbench.
Could someone with a Moto X run the nbench benchmark and post the results, here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1270596 preferably.
Nbench market link: http://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.drolez.nbench
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Running it. Will report back in 10 minutes.
Seriously , more benchmark talk.
I can tell you the new Maxx runs (real life) like a champ.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
Nate2 said:
I'd like to see if the Motorola X can outperform the Samsung Galaxy S4, using nbench.
Could someone with a Moto X run the nbench benchmark and post the results, here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1270596 preferably.
Nbench market link: http://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.drolez.nbench
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX : 44.242
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 30.979
Baseline (MSDOS*) : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU : Dual ARMv7 Processor rev 0 (v7l) 1728MHz
L2 Cache : 0
OS : Linux version 3.4.42-xline-gfd1a699-00157-gfb2f8fc ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.6.x-google 20120106 (prerelease) (GCC) ) #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Jul 18 20:25:42 CDT 2013
C compiler : gcc 4.6.0 (-march=armv7-a)
MEMORY INDEX : 10.593
INTEGER INDEX : 11.388
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 17.182
Baseline (LINUX) : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38
Use real life benchmarks like video, surf or real software.
Skickat från min C5503 via Tapatalk 2
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBench for a description of the benchmark used.
The 3 overall numbers for the Motorola X running on the stock ROM are (10.5,11.3,17.1) for memory, integer and floating-point indexes.
That would indicate each core/processor in the Moto X is 10.5,11.3,17.1 times faster than the baseline AMD K6/233 (pretty old) processor for memory, integer and floating-point operations.
My 2012 Nexus 7 is (5.1,7.7,8.1) so the Moto X is much faster in all 3 areas. But, it appears just a little slower than a Samsung Galaxy S4 I9500 (12.5,11.7,19).
Intel Core i7 (Desktop PC processor) have numbers as high as (49,40,133) for each of their 8 cores (just to show you their awesome computing power).
These tests are just for comparing computing power across the various processors out there, not video, applications, etc. that people generally use.
See http://www.tux.org/~mayer/linux/results2.html for more results.
Related
Anyone kniw if this galaxy s phone has been overclocked and to what speed??
Sent from my Incredible using XDA App
I don't think it has been. Hope it will be as in going to be picking this up soon
I highly recommend reading this article. It describes everything about the hummingbird processor (Samsung Fascinates Processor) compaired against the snapdragon. This hummingbird sound like it has some potential for OC'ing. http://alienbabeltech.com/main/?p=17125
ritkit said:
I highly recommend reading this article. It describes everything about the hummingbird processor (Samsung Fascinates Processor) compaired against the snapdragon. This hummingbird sound like it has some potential for OC'ing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No offense but that link is worthless.
So far the benchmarks on GLBenchmark.com can let you compare any phones 3D graphics and it shows that the Captivate version of the Galaxy S completely destroys the competition in raw graphics power. I am more then sure that it was able to hit its 90Mt/s that your article said it could not hit!
From androidandme website.....
Apparently the Samsung Galaxy S features their new S5PC110 application processor which was announced last year. This processor contains an ARM Cortex-A8 core paired with a PowerVR SGX540 GPU
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It also goes on to talk about how powerful it is.
Here is a GPU comparison for some of the leading smartphones:
* Motorola Droid: TI OMAP3430 with PowerVR SGX530 = 7-14 million(?) triangles/sec
* Nexus One: Qualcomm QSD8x50 with Adreno 200 = 22 million triangles/sec
* iPhone 3G S: 600 MHz Cortex-A8 with PowerVR SGX535 = 7 million triangles/sec
* Samsung Galaxy S: S5PC110 with PowerVR SGX540 = 90 million triangles/sec
And for comparison a few consoles:
* PS3: 250 million triangles/sec
* Xbox 360: 500 million triangles/sec
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now according to this information, Samsung is basically stating that it is 3x faster then the iPhone 3Gs. If you head over to GLBenchmark's website and compare the 2, the Samsung Captivate is double the speed of the iPhone 3GS in most of the test (especially the GLBenchmark Pro ES 1.1 CPU Skinning which is their most rigorous test form what I've seen).
PLEASE KEEP IN MIND that the results @ GLBenchmark look to be user submitted, so some of these people will run the test with tons of apps and programs running, while others will stop all programs to run the test. But its a good start to see what a phone can do.
Been ocerclocked to 1.2. They say in the captivate forums that if the right person gets ahold of it, it could b oc'd to 1.6
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Hi,
I'm told that the Droid-X is comparable with the Snapdragon CPU.
So far what I've seen first hand:
1. My son's Optimus (Qaulcomm Arm V6) on Cyogen 7 @ 800 MHz runs Linpack at 36 MFLOPS!
2. HTC Incredible S (Snapdragon) (stock?) runs 31 MFLOPS.
3. My Droid-X currently 12 MFLOPS, best is 16 MFLOPS.
I'm looking for 30+ MFLOPS, anyone know?
NOTE: Linpack free is in the Android Market and measures the raw computing power, Millions of Floating Point Operations per Second.
Thanks!
Hi guys,
I want the s4 from day 1. Naturally I want the best version available and I'm concerned having done some research that the snapdragon SoC gpu isn't really comparable with the sxg 544mp3.
I know the phone isn't out yet so no spot on benchmarks, but does anyone know what type of difference the two gpus have?
Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Re: Off-Topic Thread
PowerVR is clocked higher at 533mhz
Questions go b in q and a btw
Was expecting this thread for a very long time, curious to get some opinions on this. As per gsmarena and other few sites the adreno 320 on s4 is overclocked.
《posted from s3》
I consider that PowerVr is going to be a lot more powerful even if Adreno is overclocked. Also admit that EA is going to release 16 high end games optimised for octa version. Moreover this gpu is used on ipads and ipad is a King of mobile gpu performance without a doubt. Let's wait for benches I'm sure scores will be about the same level as snapdragon 800 or a bit lower due to 500mhz difference
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
can anyone give us more detailed informations please ?
beeboss said:
I consider that PowerVr is going to be a lot more powerful even if Adreno is overclocked. Also admit that EA is going to release 16 high end games optimised for octa version. Moreover this gpu is used on ipads and ipad is a King of mobile gpu performance without a doubt. Let's wait for benches I'm sure scores will be about the same level as snapdragon 800 or a bit lower due to 500mhz difference
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here is the 3dmark benchmark of the octa version(from ringhk):
Samsung Galaxy S4 (octa version)
10367 (default) / 6264 (extreme)
HTC One
10911 (default) / 6250 (extreme)
Sony Xperia Z
10256 (default) / 5804 (extreme)
LG Optimus G
7541 (default) / 4052 (extreme)
Oppo Find 5
8239 (default) / 5018 (extreme)
İ think PowerVR powerful but old technology it would have been better if Samsung chose PowerVR Rouge seriens or Mali T-658 example OpenGL-3.0
I'd say it doesn't matter, the only thing that struggles to run on the GS2 is VC, however that struggles to run smoothly on the HTC One and iPhone 5 as well, it's just poorly optimized. Really now the only difference between the 544 and 320 is bragging rights.....
frensel said:
here is the 3dmark benchmark of the octa version(from ringhk):
Samsung Galaxy S4 (octa version)
10367 (default) / 6264 (extreme)
HTC One
10911 (default) / 6250 (extreme)
Sony Xperia Z
10256 (default) / 5804 (extreme)
LG Optimus G
7541 (default) / 4052 (extreme)
Oppo Find 5
8239 (default) / 5018 (extreme)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't know if it's a firmware thing, but the lg optimus g at my store is benchmarking just at 9000 on default. Forgot the extreme score.
So I gathered some information:
Qualcomm Adreno 320:
OpenGL ES = 3.0, 2.0 & 1.1
OpenCL = 1.2
SVGT = 1.2
EGL = 1.4
Direct3D Mobile
Direct Draw
GDI
Clock - 500Mhz
GFlops - 51.2
PowerVR SGX544 MP3:
OpenGL ES = 2.1 & 1.1
OpenCL = 1.1
SVGT = 1.1
DirectX = 9.0
Direct3D Mobile
PVR2D
OpenWF
Clock - 533Mhz
GFlops - 51.1
So both are almost the same.
Adreno 320 has more tech support whereas PowerVR has more Clock.
I don't know which one is better TBH.
Source 1: http://kyokojap.myweb.hinet.net/gpu_gflops/
Source 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerVR
Source 3: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imageon
Source 4: https://developer.qualcomm.com/discover/chipsets-and-modems/adreno-gpu
Source 5: http://pt.scribd.com/doc/27337782/Powervr-Sgx-Series5xt-Ip-Core-Family-1-0
Performance wise they both have their one ups. Performance per watt goes to the power vr chip. And it will likely be that way for awhile.
Sent from my GT-N7100
Can someone tell me what is Powervr sgx544MP I plan on buying star 9500 and it specs says it has powervr sgx544MP what does the MP stand for?
ian619420 said:
Can someone tell me what is Powervr sgx544MP I plan on buying star 9500 and it specs says it has powervr sgx544MP what does the MP stand for?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The mp is only designated qhen multiple cores so in this case, 3.
Sent from my SGH-T889 using xda premium
@rbiter said:
The mp is only designated qhen multiple cores so in this case, 3.
Sent from my SGH-T889 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so it has 3 graphic cores?
ian619420 said:
so it has 3 graphic cores?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes!
Hi guys
One of my friends today just receive some unknown sample product (He's working on a labs)
+Snap 810 @2,2GHz (development board)
+Tegra K1 64bit Denver Dual Core @2,5 GHz
+Tegra K1 32 bit Quadcore
Benchmark result of Snap 810 vs everything (early beta kernel complied with GCC4.9 and benchmark in 64bit if available)
Single core Snap 810 vs [email protected] 2,5Ghz: increase 25% in single thread and 50% Multithread
+vs Tegra K1 64bit: 28% loss in single thread and 50% faster MultiThread
+vs Tegra K1 32bit: 12% faster in single thread and 34,5% faster in Multithread (2 thread vs 8 thread )
+vs Apple A7: 13,5% loss in singlethread and 86,5% faster in multithread (Same, 2 thread vs 8...)
+vs Apple A8: 20% loss in singlethread and 71% faster in multithread (same thing, 2 vs 8)
And Snap 805 is = with Tegra K1 Dual Core 64bit in perf
Also I have benchmark of Adreno 430(driver and chip still beta): faster than 30% vs Adreno 420, more than 90% faster than Apple A7 (PowerVR G6430) but loss 8-10% vs Tegra K1
Also more breaking news: Samsung Note 4 Exynos version is using Samsung CMC221 modem, Samsung have plan to use Intel XMM7260 with 22 band LTE cat 6 but drop it and using own-product with 7 band lte and cat 4
And Exynos version this time is more powerful than Snap
P/S: All thing I mentioned is confidental and NO PICTURE OF THEM (if they found out we leak them, we will get....)
Was following the following thread on the Nexus 5x subreddit when I saw this: https://www.reddit.com/r/nexus5x/comments/3v45cf/my_thoughts_on_the_phone
It seems like someone has a theory that the CPU rev may be too blame for performance issues. You can find out your rev by running Geekbench. Let me know what you find!
Mine is Rev 3 and I have no lag whatsoever. I do have a bit yellowish screen, but I solved it by using ElementalX kernel and adjusting the colors.
Samip430 said:
Was following the following thread on the Nexus 5x subreddit when I saw this: https://www.reddit.com/r/nexus5x/comments/3v45cf/my_thoughts_on_the_phone
It seems like someone has a theory that the CPU rev may be too blame for performance issues. You can find out your rev by running Geekbench. Let me know what you find!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just gave mine a shot. I have a rev 2 processor and with snapchat installed and running the phone lags real bad. If not running snapchat phone is perfect.
If it means anything
Single-Core Score - 1229
Multi-Core Score - 3479
I wonder what the revisions really do? My phone was manufactured in November and has revision 2. It's like they didn't replace one with the other but are just using both unless the revision number is getting lower the newer they are.
i have a rev 2. no performance problems here.
just tryed facebook and snapchat, it doesnt change anything performance wise.
i also play hearthstone and no prob there.
so i think i got a good one
looks like rev3 is not so good
running Chroma Rom with ElementalX Kernel
I have rev2 and my multicore score was 4k, I'm pretty sure Snapchat running poorly is all Marshmallow phones. Snapchat just isn't optimized for 6.0 yet
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
Isn't this the same thread as this one?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-5x/general/abysmal-performance-5x-t3253503
ARM implementer 65 architecture 8 variant 0 part 3331 revision 3
ARM implementer 65 architecture 8 variant 1 part 3335 revision 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These are not revisions. Geekbench is reading A57 cores (part 3335) sometimes and A53 cores (part 3331) at other times. I have no idea why it does so but I suppose it has something to do with throttling, not processor revisions.