I want to get the galaxy A7, but it come in two editions
1) CPU: Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615
GPU: Adreno 405
2) CPU: Exynos 5 Octa 5430
GPU: Mali-T628 MP6
The first is octa core at 1,5 Ghz and 1 Ghz.
The second is also octa core at 1,8 Ghz and 1,3 Ghz .
I want it for gaming so isn't the second better ???
PanosAd113 said:
I want to get the galaxy A7, but it come in two editions
1) CPU: Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615
GPU: Adreno 405
2) CPU: Exynos 5 Octa 5430
GPU: Mali-T628 MP6
The first is octa core at 1,5 Ghz and 1 Ghz.
The second is also octa core at 1,8 Ghz and 1,3 Ghz .
I want it for gaming so isn't the second better ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the Snapdragon version and its laggy. From time to time i get stutter switching app to app and navigating through the interface . GPU too is not superb, Clash of Clans plays smooth at the beginning but after a couple of minutes the frame rate stutter. I did a full reset but the same result hopefully will be fix on future updates. I have a zenfone and that performs better than my A7 (snapdragon version) in terms of gaming. Considering the price of A7 im a liitle bit dissapointed by its performance, battery life is good though i can get to 20 hours using light to moderate usage.
I guess you have to get the Exynos version in my own opinion.
PanosAd113 said:
I want to get the galaxy A7, but it come in two editions
1) CPU: Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615
GPU: Adreno 405
2) CPU: Exynos 5 Octa 5430
GPU: Mali-T628 MP6
The first is octa core at 1,5 Ghz and 1 Ghz.
The second is also octa core at 1,8 Ghz and 1,3 Ghz .
I want it for gaming so isn't the second better ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2 is better for gaming
SD 615 is 64 bit CPU and works fine when updated to Lollipop. I have seen no lags while gaming.
Related
How many type of note 3 cpu and gpu
Which one is gud for performance and battery
Quad core 2.3 or 1.9 or 1.3 as I saw on gsmarena
What about gpu as well
What to choose
Note 3 will have snapdragon 800 cpu @ 2.3 ghz. Some will have the Exynos octa core @ 1.9. I will get the Sprint version so it's snapdragon for me
Sent from my SPH-L900 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
nabilsweet007 said:
How many type of note 3 cpu and gpu
Which one is gud for performance and battery
Quad core 2.3 or 1.9 or 1.3 as I saw on gsmarena
What about gpu as well
What to choose
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As the person stated above N3 will come in two processors:
1. Slapdragon 800 @ 2.3 GHz (4 Krait cores- QUAD CORE) with Adreno 330 which can shoot 4k Videos @ 30 FPS.
2. Exynos 5420 with 8 cores- 4 A15 @ 1.9 GHz and 4 A7 @ 1.3 GHz. It will have Mali T628 MP6 GPU. However it wont shoot videos at 4k resolution.
Both of the GPUs will have OpenGL ES 3.0.
These stuffs can, you know, be obtained from top notch tech sites like gsmarena etc and with a quite bit of research hypothetically be answered.
But to answer your last question- it is too early to tell.
1. Lets see how the real world users say about daily usage in terms of Slapdragon 800 and Exynos.
2. Lets see how GSMArena turns out regarding battery endurance.
awesome smartphone
it will be interesting what the snapdragon will do. However its the highest end 800 not the regular 800 so optimalizing will be limited unless that one becomes mainstream. Tricky.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
Hi,
I noticed that there were 3 models of Galaxy Note 3.
The N9000 looks to not have the Qualcom 2.3 GHz. According to gsmarena it has this : Quad-core 1.9 GHz Cortex-A15 & quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 (N9000)
1. Does it have both CPU at sametime in the same cell phone or it could be wheter one of them?
2. Are performance lower than the Quad-core 2.3 GHz Krait 400 (N9005, N9002)
3. How can I make sure I buy the good one?
4. Why selling same cell phone but with different cpu?
Thanks
jamesst20 said:
Hi,
I noticed that there were 3 models of Galaxy Note 3.
The N9000 looks to not have the Qualcom 2.3 GHz. According to gsmarena it has this : Quad-core 1.9 GHz Cortex-A15 & quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 (N9000)
1. Does it have both CPU at sametime in the same cell phone or it could be wheter one of them?
2. Are performance lower than the Quad-core 2.3 GHz Krait 400 (N9005, N9002)
3. How can I make sure I buy the good one?
4. Why selling same cell phone but with different cpu?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Watch "Samsung Galaxy NOTE 3 N9000 vs N9005 / Exynos octa vs Snapdragon 800" on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fdnj-kdAYnE&feature=youtube_gdata_player
jaythenut said:
Hi Watch "Samsung Galaxy NOTE 3 N9000 vs N9005 / Exynos octa vs Snapdragon 800" on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fdnj-kdAYnE&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
If I am from Canada, which device is available to me?
jamesst20 said:
Thanks!
If I am from Canada, which device is available to me?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://m.androidauthority.com/galaxy-note-3-release-date-260880/
hello, I am ready to buy a android tv but now I don't know which to buy, there are 2 versions of mk808b, one is dualcore with a rockchip rk3066 cortex a9 1.6 ghz and the other is amlogic s805 cortex a5 quadcore 1.5 ghz, I know that more cores is not always better performance, please can you say me which is better and why? thanks in advance
Hi,
I decide between two HU:
One with CPU: Rockchip Cortex A9 Quad Core, 1.6GHZ
And other with Allwiner R16 A7 Quad Core CPU 1.6GHz
It's worth paying extra 50 US for different CPU (Rockchip )?
Thanks for your help
Hello want to change my aunt and I am in big trouble
My choices are an Android device based on MTK 8127A from ATOTO but that come with 2 GB of RAM or a regular one based on PX 5 which come with 4 GB of RAM.
I understand that the MTK car goes devices are a little bit rare
So what to choose:
ATOTO with a MTK PROCESSOR and 2 GB of RAM, pretty good support and rom updates or a PX 5 ?
Which is faster and more stable?
Thank you
sandibad said:
Hello want to change my aunt and I am in big trouble
My choices are an Android device based on MTK 8127A from ATOTO but that come with 2 GB of RAM or a regular one based on PX 5 which come with 4 GB of RAM.
I understand that the MTK car goes devices are a little bit rare
So what to choose:
ATOTO with a MTK PROCESSOR and 2 GB of RAM, pretty good support and rom updates or a PX 5 ?
Which is faster and more stable?
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what i have heard, MediaTek has better reputation than Rockchip. Which one is more stable / faster depends on how the SoC is integrated into the platform, how the Software Governers control the clock rate of the SoC. So this is difficult to answer strictly based on the SoC chip itself.
SoC Chip: MTK 8127A
Soc-based Quad-core 1.5Ghz Cortex A7 CPU
GPU ARM Mali-450 MP4 .
System Version: ATOTO AICE OS 9.4, which is developed & customized based on Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS;
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PX5
8 core ARM Cortex-A53 (ARMv8) 1,5 GHz
GPU owerVR SGX6110 jusqu'à 600 Mhz (OpenGL 3.2, OpenGL ES 1.1/2.0/3.1, OpenCL, DirectX9.3)
Android 8.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but there are also :
PX6 ! devices (but it's news no more info a this moment) :
Android 8,1
CPUX6 RK3399
2 Core cortex A72 2ghz
4 Core Cortex A53 1.5ghz
RAM: SAMSUNG DDR3 4 GB
https://forum.xda-developers.com/an...-android-unit-cortex-a72-four-cortex-t3847427
And A72 Core is a lot better than A53, and A53 is a little bit better than the very old Cortex A7
I agree with @mum1989 that A72 and A53 CPU cores have much better specifications than the A7. If the applications you run on the head unit can take advantage of the ARMv8 instruction set or if the workload can be distributed across the cores, then PX6/PX6 SoC may well perform better than MTK8127A. On the other hand, in my day-to-day use of ATOTO A6 Pro which uses MTK8127A, I have never observed it to be slow or stutter or otherwise show signs that older A72 Core was limiting the end-user experience.