Porting roms to AT&T Note - Galaxy Note GT-N7000 General

Is it feasible that international note roms could be ported to the AT&T notes by reorienting the kernel and modifying the ROM like with the original galaxy s?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium

I would think so...maybe some kind of hellraise action....i was actually thinking about that the other day...my buddy has the AT&T Note

I don't think so, the internals are quite different.

Spartoi said:
I don't think so, the internals quite different.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. Porting stuff from N7000 to ATT would require the same amount of effort as building Roms from scratch.

Related

S3 in canada and ROMs

So I'm trying to consider whether I will purchase the International version or the LTE Canadian version...
I know that in terms of the processor's, quite frankly, they are identical for performance, with the LTE having better cores but the International having 4, so this isn't exactly a problem of "which is better"..
What I'm curious about, is how easy/likely are ports of ROMs and Mods going to be from the international version to the LTE version? Because quite frankly even if the Canadian version is outright better I want some dev support.. :/
What do you guys think? Same dilemma as with the HOX intn'l vs LTE ><
I will take LTE speeds and the 2 GB memory...
Sent from my htc_evita using xda premium
rafsi said:
I will take LTE speeds and the 2 GB memory...
Sent from my htc_evita using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No yeah they seem awesome and the CPU will perform pretty much identically, but I really like the dev community the HTC Desire Z had and I want something similar :/
There probably wont be many ports of international roms if any at all. Though, if the Canadian and US versions are the same that will certainly bring more to the lte version in the way of development.
I'm getting the international version version for several reasons.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using XDA Premium HD app
Look at the one x american dev and you'll get your answer D: no love from devs for S4 based phones....
duykhang524 said:
Look at the one x american dev and you'll get your answer D: no love from devs for S4 based phones....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
look at the intl note and the american note dev, you will get your answer
Totòòò said:
look at the intl note and the american note dev, you will get your answer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure i found the answer lol
Sent from my MB860 using XDA
Lol the amswer is that if the device is astonishing both versions will have great devs
Sent from my HTC One S using xda premium
duykhang524 said:
Look at the one x american dev and you'll get your answer D: no love from devs for S4 based phones....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well i mean it does have over 60 thread on it ! That's not too shabby.. I want a way to get the phone cheap but there's no way bell will carry the international version i may just have to wait for the next nexus.. *sigh* this coulda been cool haha, expecting as much development as the s2

How I bricked my phone is a few days

Rooting the phone was pretty strait forward.
Until I tried to flash an omega rom for i9300.
I thought since the recovery and boot partition are separate hard bricking the phone is near impossible.
it is very possible.
sent it to mobile tech videos for a JTAG repair.
It just arrived today ill keep you guys posted.
lakser said:
Until I tried to flash an omega rom for i9300.
It just arrived today ill keep you guys posted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's for i9300 for a reason the phones are completely different they really just look the same.
Waiting for results from Mobile Tech Video JTAG repair...
You flashed a rom from another phone to this one? Same name, different insides.
The Kurgan said:
Waiting for results from Mobile Tech Video JTAG repair...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will let you guys know the results.
lakser said:
I will let you guys know the results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
jtag repair was sucessful but lte coverage was not working after.
may have to get att to replace.
good luck all
Wow...why would you do that?
Sent from my SGH-I747M using xda premium
It's only a smart phone if the user is sma...eh...nevermind.
Duffman14 said:
Wow...why would you do that?
Sent from my SGH-I747M using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd guess he failed to pay attention to his phone model and the intended phone model for the ROM.
Damn that sucks dude, idk why people with the US version always try to flash our ROM's, just doesn't make sense!
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Nickel Dime Bay said:
Damn that sucks dude, idk why people with the US version always try to flash our ROM's, just doesn't make sense!
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be fair, it doesn't help that they're all called "Galaxy S III" while having very different internals. It does make accessories and stuff a lot better though.
ponyboy82 said:
To be fair, it doesn't help that they're all called "Galaxy S III" while having very different internals. It does make accessories and stuff a lot better though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The title of the forum is Galaxy S III I9300, and the US forums has ATT and all the other carriers in the title. I think they should just rename it to International Galaxy S III I9300
Nickel Dime Bay said:
The title of the forum is Galaxy S III I9300, and the US forums has ATT and all the other carriers in the title. I think they should just rename it to International Galaxy S III I9300
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think if you are rooting and flashing ROMs to your phone, you should at least know the model number like how the Sprint GSIII is SPH-L710.
|Trolling with a smile|
Nickel Dime Bay said:
The title of the forum is Galaxy S III I9300, and the US forums has ATT and all the other carriers in the title. I think they should just rename it to International Galaxy S III I9300
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I still don't get the "international" label we put on phones. The US version is the only one that's different. If anything, there should be a "standard" version and a "US" version.
And Korean and Japanese and Canadian and.... G and... P...
Sent from my GT-I9300
ponyboy82 said:
To be fair, it doesn't help that they're all called "Galaxy S III" while having very different internals. It does make accessories and stuff a lot better though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This ^^^^
2 completely different phones from the inside. WTG Samsung !
Don_Perrignon said:
I still don't get the "international" label we put on phones. The US version is the only one that's different. If anything, there should be a "standard" version and a "US" version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's called "American exceptionalism." Meh.

[Q] Rooting on Exynos Based Devices?

Hi Guys,
So I've just put a deposit down on the S4 with Carphone Warehouse, as I've waited so long for something worthy of replacing my S2 I had to have one, but I've missed the S3 generation entirely, so I'm not sure what the story is with the Exynos processors...
Basically, I don't care about flashing custom ROMs on my phone at all, I went through all that with my old HTC HD2 just in an effort to make it usable, but thats not really necessary anymore. I would, however, like to root my S4. Is this something thats likely to be possible in the not too distant future, or will Samsungs reluctance to help Devs put an end to this as well as custom ROMs?
shortie1987 said:
Hi Guys,
So I've just put a deposit down on the S4 with Carphone Warehouse, as I've waited so long for something worthy of replacing my S2 I had to have one, but I've missed the S3 generation entirely, so I'm not sure what the story is with the Exynos processors...
Basically, I don't care about flashing custom ROMs on my phone at all, I went through all that with my old HTC HD2 just in an effort to make it usable, but thats not really necessary anymore. I would, however, like to root my S4. Is this something thats likely to be possible in the not too distant future, or will Samsungs reluctance to help Devs put an end to this as well as custom ROMs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes possible and easily unlike other manufacturers.
Just don't expect CM.
That is good to hear I'm not really bothered about CM anyways to be honest, I ran it for a while on the S2 but preferred the working touchwiz experience to the stock, not working CM at the time...
Its easy to root but development wont be so good if you are going to get exynos model. Qualcomm is another story,opposite..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
I think in the UK on 3g networks I'll be on the Exynos model anyways... but that's the one I want so I'm happy with that!
uvaman said:
Its easy to root but development wont be so good if you are going to get exynos model. Qualcomm is another story,opposite..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOOOOOOOL
I believe chainfire said he already has rooted an s4, by virtual means (remotely)
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Thread moved to proper forum.
Wow, he might be using an emulator to simulate the s4 rom. Maybe just a guess
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app

[Q] Google's ROM? [UPDATE: June 30th]

Hey guys
So Google will be releasing their own version of the Galaxy S4 ("Clean" Version) pretty soon.
Will we be getting the chance to install this ROM over our current phones? (i9505 + i9500)
Or is it just for people who bought this specific phone?
Thank you,
Omga4000
UPDATE: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=43081117&postcount=321
Looks like we will be getting this clean ROM after all!! Yay!!
Most likely yes. Devs should be able to port it over. However it looks like many of the sensors won't work. Ie infrared
Sent from my SGH-I337M using xda app-developers app
I think the i9500 will be left out.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Theshawty said:
I think the i9500 will be left out.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes
Why will he be left out?
Is the Galaxy S4 Google Edition based on rhe snapdragon SoC?
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Omga4000 said:
Why will he be left out?
Is the Galaxy S4 Google Edition based on rhe snapdragon SoC?
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check this link -> Site
If somehow, CM10.1 arrived at i9500 variant then google AOSP may be come over 9500.
Psykologikal said:
Most likely yes. Devs should be able to port it over. However it looks like many of the sensors won't work. Ie infrared
Sent from my SGH-I337M using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why? Sensors like Infrared works because App for it already available on store because like WatchOn...
you can Download seperate
Omga4000 said:
Why will he be left out?
Is the Galaxy S4 Google Edition based on rhe snapdragon SoC?
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because the Google edition will be the I9505G, i.e. using the Qualcomm SoC.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Yes figured it's going to be snapdragon..
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Omga4000 said:
Yes figured it's going to be snapdragon..
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With regards to aosp roms, the i9500 is doomed, my friend. Doomed. Anyone compiling aosp for i9500 is wasting their time because exynos 5410 is even worse than 44xx.
So the joke's on you for not buying the qcomm version.
Theshawty said:
With regards to aosp roms, the i9500 is doomed, my friend. Doomed. Anyone compiling aosp for i9500 is wasting their time because exynos 5410 is even worse than 44xx.
So the joke's on you for not buying the qcomm version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see the joke here..
In what way is it my fault I live in Europe
and Samsung decided to market the OCTA version here?
Anyway - yesterday Samsung began releasing the open source code
for the i9500, so future may be brighter than you think
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Omga4000 said:
I don't see the joke here..
In what way is it my fault I live in Europe
and Samsung decided to market the OCTA version here?
Anyway - yesterday Samsung began releasing the open source code
for the i9500, so future may be brighter than you think
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I live in Europe as well but luckily they chose to market the LTE variant here. You could have imported an i9505, though.
Look, what they release on arndale has nothing to do with what they have in their phones. If I'm wrong on that, I'd request an insight from @Entropy512 because he knows a lot about this stuff.
I would like a better insight as well.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Omga4000 said:
Hey guys
So Google will be releasing their own version of the Galaxy S4 ("Clean" Version) pretty soon.
Will we be getting the chance to install this ROM over our current phones? (i9505 + i9500)
Or is it just for people who bought this specific phone?
Thank you,
Omga4000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Remember, this is a stock Android UI - so far, nothing more (such as AOSP support) has been announced, and I suspect it's unlikely. So it actually will be of zero benefit for AOSP bringups like CM.
As far as porting it just like porting a TW firmware between Qcom devices? Maybe, I don't know how successful people have been in doing such a thing. (e.g. if they've got it as automated as I did with Hellraiser on the I777).
Since I9500 is Exynos, the Google Edition is of zero use for that device.
As I said long ago when the Google Edition was first announced:
If it's not AOSP supported, it basically means nothing
If it's AOSP supported and qcom, it's nice but not a huge benefit since CAF is already quite good
If it's AOSP supported and Exynos, that's a game changer and would be what would cause me to consider Samsung again. But we know for certain it's not Exynos, and it's highly unlikely it'll be AOSP supported - Samsung's underlying base software is too Samsunged (hacked up) in the non-GE GS4s for them to have AOSP support any time soon. The Google Edition is just covering up their crappy underlying software with a less sucky UI as far as I can tell. We'll know for sure when the device is released.
95mediatech said:
Why? Sensors like Infrared works because App for it already available on store because like WatchOn...
you can Download seperate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They won't be able to include Samsung drivers into the device. If you use a non stock rom now watch on won't work because it doesn't know where to find the infrared.
I hope that Google does it right and gets the sensors to work but at this point it doesn't seem like they will. Maybe Samsung will release the drivers someday
Sent from my SGH-I337M using xda app-developers app
Psykologikal said:
Maybe Samsung will release the drivers someday
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously starting to doubt it.
I'm actually thinking of selling my device and getting the snapdragon variant.
I heard there's going to be a version with the snapdragon 800 + LTE
so I might wait for that and replace my phone.
So sad
UPDATE: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=43081117&postcount=321
Looks like we will be getting this clean ROM after all!! Yay!!
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

[POLL] SM-N900W8/Canadian Variant Note 3 users want our own forum!

Dear Mods,
I know I'm not alone when I say this, but we would like our own forum for our Canadian variant of our device. As our device is significantly different from other variants, and nobody likes specific projects for N900W8 to be jumbled along with ROMs for N900 or N9005 (as they can't be installed on a W8 device without major issues), I would like to start a poll to gather people who would like a clean forum, not a forum with three different variant's ROMs jumbled up together that aren't cross flashable.
Also asking questions and finding solutions is easier when the entire forum uses the same device, so a solution for the specific device is much more convenient in the same forum!
Also go here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=46446026&postcount=11600 to like my post and also post a quick reply saying you want the N900W8 as well!
Thanks a lot!
Nicholas
Please!!
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
This sure would make things a lot easier that's for sure...especially once things really get going with development and once our phones have roms released
I agree with this idea!
Yes please !
Another yes. It's always been jumbled together with AT&T and then i have to manual filter to find items that are applicable.
+1 On this. Right now I'm reading on different sub forums to find out which model my phablet actually is compatible with.
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Agreed we need our own forum since the cross flashing as seen with s3 and s4 arent going to apply with N3 so it would seem.
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using xda premium
flashing Roms even from other versions of the same model don't work. We definitely need our own board.
Woolios said:
+1 On this. Right now I'm reading on different sub forums to find out which model my phablet actually is compatible with.
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just be aware that it looks to not be compatible with any if the ones with their own forum as of yet....maybe with custom roms or a custom installer but not now
Canadian Note 3 Forum for Prime Minister 2013!
Mr Speaker
Does this mean all Canadian note 3 are the same even wind mobile version?
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk 4
htc fan89 said:
Does this mean all Canadian note 3 are the same even wind mobile version?
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Short answer is no...
We just don't want to be lumped into the U.S.A providers.
AvatarReborn said:
Short answer is no...
We just don't want to be lumped into the U.S.A providers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's because the model from bell also has w8, so was thinking maybe all Canadian models are the same
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk 4
htc fan89 said:
It's because the model from bell also has w8, so was thinking maybe all Canadian models are the same
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bell/telus..rogers/fido probably.
Wind runs on diff frequencies. ..people on wind dont even get LTE. having this phone and no lte is like having a ferrrari but you cant take it out of first gear!
At the very least wind users will need to flash another baseband to run a rogers or bell ROM
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using xda premium
I'm just wondering, would it be possible to eventually kind of convert the Canadian Note 3 variant into an American variant? I don't think I've read about any hardware differences between the two variants. Also, I can't imagine there would be too much development for just the Canadian Note 3 alone (or has there been an active developer community for Canadian devices previously?).
jeeholim said:
I'm just wondering, would it be possible to eventually kind of convert the Canadian Note 3 variant into an American variant? I don't think I've read about any hardware differences between the two variants. Also, I can't imagine there would be too much development for just the Canadian Note 3 alone (or has there been an active developer community for Canadian devices previously?).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For your information, the Galaxy S4 have his own section in the forum :
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2257
As you can see, there is plenty of roms and folks exchanging informations, tips and bugs for the same device, which make sense for me
Just remind every one, not only Canadian is using N900W8, N900W8 is a very large group. Mexico, Many South America country is using N900W8 too.
Plz develop this model phone.
francislepine87 said:
For your information, the Galaxy S4 have his own section in the forum :
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2257
As you can see, there is plenty of roms and folks exchanging informations, tips and bugs for the same device, which make sense for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that is because at&t is SGH-i337 and rogers/bell is SGH-i337M; T-mobile is SGH-M919, Wind is SGH-M919V.
But now the model name is big difference, dont know if the hardware has different or is bootloader lock or not difference.
qingmui said:
Just remind every one, not only Canadian is using N900W8, N900W8 is a very large group. Mexico, Many South America country is using N900W8 too.
Plz develop this model phone.
I think that is because at&t is SGH-i337 and rogers/bell is SGH-i337M; T-mobile is SGH-M919, Wind is SGH-M919V.
But now the model name is big difference, dont know if the hardware has different or is bootloader lock or not difference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah that's why there's a / in the title too
That raises a question too. Is the Wind version of W8 actually the same as the Robellus W8? Even though numbers match up, we won't know till we can compare the stock ROMs with each other.
Sent from my fingers to your face using my Samsung Galaxy Note 3!

Categories

Resources