A few days ago I got out and about in town to test out the night shot capabilities of these cameras. Overall very impressed with the low noise, details, and the fact the black night sky actually looks deep black as it was. The Ultrawide has to be one of the best I've tested for low light, really something the details and lack of noise artifacts. My only minor criticism here is the shots could be a little brighter overall? And the front cameras can be a little overexposed or artificially bright at times. This even happens in daylight with the front selfie camera.
But impressive night photography.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Related
There's been a lot of debate about the pentile screen of the Note Pro, some people can see the blurry/jaggedy outline of text, while others can't... so I present to you a macro comparison of screens.
I've used the playstore as the source; tripod was stationary, I just moved the tablets and focused.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My opinion: The P900 is clearly missing parts of the text/image... it's like a strainer/sieve and can't even draw circles properly. It's considerably brighter though... both were on 100% brightness with Auto disabled... BTW: with Auto brightness on and in sunlight you can get the P900 even brighter.
The N10 has more natural colours, but they look a little flat; P900 was in dynamic mode.
Been trying out the camera on my new s7 and for all the hype of the low light quality im a little dissapointed at the photos i was trying to get of my kids on a night out bowling yesterday. Thought id upload a picture, which was about the best i could get, and get peoples thoughtson the quality.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Face detection working, in auto mode with auto flash (which was not going off)
Why does it appear so grainy and blurred should i be expecting better?
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
It would look better if you took the picture without the lights coming from the bowling pin area in the background. Similar to having the sun in back of your photo subject. Also, take some low light pictures with your old phone and compare the two. Should be a big difference.
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
Hello all,
I've been looking around to buy this phone and most reviewers say that the low light camera is bad. However, one review did say that with night mode, it gets much better. Is this true? If so, why don't the reviewers use that mode? Am I missing something?
Thanks
bump
These were shot with night mode in my dimly lit studio (only a 60 watt lamp in the opposite corner is on) on a Moto X Pure Edition.
I think the camera on this phone is great compared to my previous Moto phones. Especially with well-lit shots. You can decide for yourself by the photos.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my XT1575 using XDA-Developers mobile app
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/sets/72157681819029571/with/33937948243/
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Promising, indeed !
aknotts415 they look outstanding. I wonder if tripod was used because some images shutter is 30-40. In comparison to what has been posted already it looks so much better, steadier and practically free of motion blur.
nebulaoperator said:
aknotts415 they look outstanding. I wonder if tripod was used because some images shutter is 30-40. In comparison to what has been posted already it looks so much better, steadier and practically free of motion blur.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats not full seconds thats partial,
indeed. I could see less light bleeding in this series. I love that shot IMAG0061
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/34615441411/in/album-72157681819029571/
Thread closed, there is a camera thread here: camera thread
Look at this :/ I've noticed this a few days ago. Any idea why the photos are so bad? I have the phone or over a year now and camera glass is definetely not clean but i think it was like that definetely for few months now. Phone sometimes was in a case and sometimes was not. 1st photo is from couple days ago and 2nd from october 2017
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Looks like skin oil smeared on the lens. Even a small amount can make a hazy photo when the light shines on the lens.
Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk
Lens seem to be clear, no visible stuff under the glass. I must add that photos from regular camera and wide are both very bloomy
clean your lense with q-tips and try again it can be you touch your lenses or someone did