Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Motorola Edge + come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Motorola Edge + come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excellent hardware, especially the main camera. But the software is weak. But use a gcam mod and it improves a lot.
benjamminh said:
Excellent hardware, especially the main camera. But the software is weak. But use a gcam mod and it improves a lot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which gcam is compatible with all 3 camera of edge plus ?
Use at your own risk. I bricked a Z Force using a gcam mod. I haven't tried beta 7 yet. Turn off white balance and use next to last option for main camera in the menus. https://www.celsoazevedo.com/files/android/google-camera/dev-burial/
Sent from my motorola edge plus using Tapatalk
Related
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Nokia 3.1 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Nokia 3.1 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This isn't a great camera, there are much better ones in the market in the same price range..
1. Oversaturation: This seems fine..
2. Sharp detail: Even with a dual camera set up at the highest resolution.. the image isn't sharp enough.. but the live Bokeh mode does an okayish job though..
3. Appropriate exposure: Sometimes, images aren't bright enough.. you have to go to manual mode to fix it.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Picture quality is worst compare to their other budget phones
cheese, the photos are of awful quality. pretty much the worst camera i've ever used apart from a 2000's nokia
7a
I quite like my 6a, my only problems are with write to SD card permissions!, but I would like a better camera. do you think the 7a would be much of an improvement?
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Honor 10 Lite come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
The back facing camera is really crisp and clear. The front facing camera doesn't have a lot of detail, and especially shows when using snapchat.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Samsung Galaxy M31 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Photo quality is decent here. Not bad not good.
Colour depth is not there. Err I am not allowed to post pics here. Wonder why.
Sent from my SM-M315F using Tapatalk
Worst. It adds too much color also not clear.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Huawei Mate 40 Pro come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Huawei Mate 40 Pro come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I too tried the image quality of the pics taken in my new Huawei Mate 40 Pro which I bought a month ago from Xcite. To be frank, I was really surprised with the photos. Didn't really expect these kind of image quality.
Why photos are not will stabilized?
The phone quality is truly astounding!
maybe some pictures are nice, but they never solved the portrait mode, only the first update was good, and never again, the portrait mode in super mode was like a dslr at the beginning, with each update it got worse, you often miss parts of your hair, so and more, neither the front selfie nor the back still work well, and I've never seen in updates that they edited the camera's allication, disgusting.