Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Samsung Galaxy M31 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Photo quality is decent here. Not bad not good.
Colour depth is not there. Err I am not allowed to post pics here. Wonder why.
Sent from my SM-M315F using Tapatalk
Worst. It adds too much color also not clear.
Related
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the LG V30 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Performs poorly when using the camera for barcode scanning and online banking deposit check scanning. Also pics are somewhat grainy and less vivid in comparison to Samsung.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Honor V10 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
The photo quality from this phone can be a little fuzzy when you zoom in. There are definitely better cameras out there.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Nokia 3.1 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Nokia 3.1 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This isn't a great camera, there are much better ones in the market in the same price range..
1. Oversaturation: This seems fine..
2. Sharp detail: Even with a dual camera set up at the highest resolution.. the image isn't sharp enough.. but the live Bokeh mode does an okayish job though..
3. Appropriate exposure: Sometimes, images aren't bright enough.. you have to go to manual mode to fix it.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Picture quality is worst compare to their other budget phones
cheese, the photos are of awful quality. pretty much the worst camera i've ever used apart from a 2000's nokia
7a
I quite like my 6a, my only problems are with write to SD card permissions!, but I would like a better camera. do you think the 7a would be much of an improvement?
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Honor 10 Lite come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
The back facing camera is really crisp and clear. The front facing camera doesn't have a lot of detail, and especially shows when using snapchat.