The app looks better.
Anyone?
I believe it's pretty much the same except for that wide angle option.
I don't think we can use it on our N9's. I'd love to use it for that color pop selfie focus thing
someone needs to port it
bober10113 said:
someone needs to port it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Speaking of ports I always found it funny that folks would go through hell to Port another phone's camera like gcam but won't try to poet and upgraded version of their own such as this
Seriously thats true... it's much easy too. Should we start a request to dev thread or something.
the Instagram mode would be the main reason to port for me. would the port be possible?
Do we know any dev to whom we could ask for
I mean the mods skim and monitor these threads supposedly but they probably won't tag the people they know probably know how to Port stuff
Still wondering about this one.... Like... Gcams cool but can we get a port of our own updated software? Please?
I couldn't agree with you more.. Please any mod reply to our concern here.
here it is:
https://1drv.ms/u/s!AhXVLDDj8g3AgfFsz0U2Z6mJaCyA-Q
now just need someone to port it...lol
bober10113 said:
here it is:
https://1drv.ms/u/s!AhXVLDDj8g3AgfFsz0U2Z6mJaCyA-Q
now just need someone to port it...lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not gonna lie I would try to learn how to Port an app my dang self because most devs and porters only ever want other phones software never to simply make an update for our owns available
Way to go bro!!!
Kotin89 said:
Way to go bro!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm gonna look into it to see what I can do if anything ?
KingVekxin said:
I'm gonna look into it to see what I can do if anything ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's the spirit!
I have not done a port in years. Always use to port things for my own amusement and development but after playing with the S10 camera I actually wouldn't mind it on our device. I will give it a try but I can't guarantee anything.
thank you soo much for the reply. hope you do it.. and thanks again for your help.
K-alz said:
I believe it's pretty much the same except for that wide angle option.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Galaxy 10's camera allows you to make videos in HDR10+.
So I'd like them to port to Note 9.
First of all the S10 camera has hardware specific features. Secondly, the Samsung camera app is a system app that integrates throughout Samsung's OneUI allowing it to be used from within several Samsung applications seamlessly. Without root or the ability to first remove the stock Samsung camera, you can't install another Samsung camera whether it's ported or not, it won't be allowed to install and be given the system-wide permissions that are required for the camera to function the way the stock N9 camera does. Porting isn't the issue. It's getting around root, kernel DM-verity which will automatically prevent the phone from booting once a system app is modified and it's signature no longer matches. From my experience with this, it's simply not worth the time or effort since we have locked bootloaders and no reliable root method or ability to flash a kernel with DM-Verity disabled which would allow sytstem apps to be modified and/or replaced such as the Samsung Camera.
Related
Hello,
I don't really like TouchWiz and its many useless apps that slow down the system.
I prefer the Vanilla Andoid feeling, so I would like to use CyanogenMod.
But I have one big problem; there are some features that are using the Samsung Framework which I would like to keep on using. The most important app is the Samsung Camera, because it includes a slow motion video function. It would be wasteful to own a Galaxy S5 and not use that function. Same for the finger print scanner. I don't really use it, but when I want to use it, I want to be able to do so, since I have a Samsung Galaxy S5.
Has anyone got an idea for a solution for this problem? Thank you!
- Samuel K.
It's not possible. Or should I say its too difficult to port the camera. One of the things you sadly need to give up going to CM.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=51797486
ad0dh67 said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=51797486
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you, I didn't know that. Would someone please move the thread? Thanks. (Or, can I do that? If so, how?)
EDIT: Ok, it has been moved. Thanks for not deleting the post
I already see hibryd rom, sammy + aokp in s2, but for s5 didnt
Has anyone installed his on a Note 3 with Lollipop? Has to be sideloaded. Haven't yet tried. I could test if no one has. Looks great!
https://github.com/PkmX/lcamera
Carlito17_2000 said:
Has anyone installed his on a Note 3 with Lollipop? Has to be sideloaded. Haven't yet tried. I could test if no one has. Looks great!
https://github.com/PkmX/lcamera
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately Samsung and/or AT&T either did not enable or outright removed the Camera 2 api
which is supposed to allow for RAW capture. That was the one thing I truly looked forward to. Imagine my
disappointment when I later found out that the camera 2 api was not available. If it is simply disabled it
may be possible to fix it. Perhaps one of the more knowledgeable members could answer that question.
evlguin said:
Unfortunately Samsung and/or AT&T either did not enable or outright removed the Camera 2 api
which is supposed to allow for RAW capture. That was the one thing I truly looked forward to. Imagine my
disappointment when I later found out that the camera 2 api was not available. If it is simply disabled it
may be possible to fix it. Perhaps one of the more knowledgeable members could answer that question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Camera would need new drivers. But they are not open sourced...only Samsung has access to it. Unfortunately, I dont see them releasing them because it might hurt S6 sales.
Walter.White said:
Camera would need new drivers. But they are not open sourced...only Samsung has access to it. Unfortunately, I dont see them releasing them because it might hurt S6 sales.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for your reply! It is most appreciated. That did not occur to me, however, it does make sense. Perhaps someday.
Thanks guys
We know there are work in progress to port CM 12 on T810 and T710 but none for T815 and T715
So those like me with T815 or T715 or ... that are looking for CM for their device can post their request in CyanogenMod Forum request page
http://forum.cyanogenmod.org/topic/116361-samsung-galaxy-tab-s2/
Yes; even without phone fuctions is ok for start. I see note 4 exynos got decent cm13 now; I hope no impossible to give it for tab s2 lte. Would be great
Hey, I'm new to this, but I want to give it a shot to try a port for the T715.
I think it should be no problem to make a build without modem support.
So my plan would be to use the source of the T710, if @CTXz allows me to use his sources.
Next I want to try to integrate the modem/ RIL sources, but don't expect too much! I'm completely new to android development and this will be my first project doing myself.
Just did some compilings and ports, but never to new unsupported devices. Maybe with some help it will be possible for me.
Greets, Phil!
Philippovitsch said:
Hey, I'm new to this, but I want to give it a shot to try a port for the T715.
I think it should be no problem to make a build without modem support.
So my plan would be to use the source of the T710, if @CTXz allows me to use his sources.
Next I want to try to integrate the modem/ RIL sources, but don't expect too much! I'm completely new to android development and this will be my first project doing myself.
Just did some compilings and ports, but never to new unsupported devices. Maybe with some help it will be possible for me.
Greets, Phil!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey, you really don't need to ask to use my sources A mention at the finished ROM would be all I need . However, if you plan to support it, I recommend joining my git group
CTXz said:
Hey, you really don't need to ask to use my sources A mention at the finished ROM would be all I need . However, if you plan to support it, I recommend joining my git group
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey, ok great, thank you!
So let's try it!
A question:
What does one gain and lose by going from stock Samsung to CM12/13?
Thanks!
optionalmgrr.la said:
A question:
What does one gain and lose by going from stock Samsung to CM12/13?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is a very tuff question to answer in just one post and depends on particular preferences. My advise is to Google: Cyanogenmod and TouchWiz.
Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk
danyvw said:
That is a very tuff question to answer in just one post and depends on particular preferences. My advise is to Google: Cyanogenmod and TouchWiz.
Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems the main issue is battery and camera (quality).
i think i messed my t817v. i rooted using odin, and cannot figure out what to do next. it tries to install but gives error message, also my tab wont charge, and when hooked into odin it keeps "adding then removed" over and over again... now i have a tablet that does not work.
any help on this would be awesome.
@CTXz
Philippovitsch said:
Hey, I'm new to this, but I want to give it a shot to try a port for the T715.
I think it should be no problem to make a build without modem support.
So my plan would be to use the source of the T710, if @CTXz allows me to use his sources.
Next I want to try to integrate the modem/ RIL sources, but don't expect too much! I'm completely new to android development and this will be my first project doing myself.
Just did some compilings and ports, but never to new unsupported devices. Maybe with some help it will be possible for me.
Greets, Phil!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would love that!
I also posted a device request at the CyanogenMod Forum.
What you always lose with CM is Bluetooth aptX support for higher quality Bluetooth audio, since they have no licence. And since now there is official MM for the S2 and it - with enough free storage and 3 GM of RAM and root available - really doesn't profit any more from a "slim" ROM than earlier devices did, can anybody point me to a real advantage of CM?
For me CM was never about storage, but about control. As far as possible (for I am no programmer) I want to decide about the rights apps have and don't. It starts with being able to delete them and goes on with being able to restrict their access rights. As far as I remember such privacy guard things are much more easier to accomplish with CM.
Pegaside said:
For me CM was never about storage, but about control. As far as possible (for I am no programmer) I want to decide about the rights apps have and don't. It starts with being able to delete them and goes on with being able to restrict their access rights. As far as I remember such privacy guard things are much more easier to accomplish with CM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But stock MM offers these permission settings now, so what else?
saintsimon said:
But stock MM offers these permission settings now, so what else?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My TAB s2 is my first Samsung device.... ( other android devices being nexus 7, xperia z2 / z3, moto g 4G ) ...... I love the tablet but I must say the draw of a supported CM ROM would be the look / feel of stock android and the way the system behaves. Whilst with a rooted device you can remove bloatware, the system itself does not change. All of my other devices have been stock or only lightly skinned....and basically stock once you swap out the launcher.... so I have come to like that. I do find touchwiz to be a little in my face and I do notice the system intrusions a little...... a personal thing of course and I am not complaining as I made the decision to buy it knowing full well what Touchwiz was... but the hardware in the tablet and the price was the draw-card (got the WiFi version here in Aus the first month on sale for $540 ... in comparison, the Nexus 9 was circa $700 and the Ipad Air 2 64gb was $730). My nexus 7 2013 runs MM with less and smoother than the TAB s2 runs LP. I could only imagine what it could do with an ASOP ROM once the bugs were fixed.
Could it be due to a defect usb-port?
optionalmgrr.la said:
A question:
What does one gain and lose by going from stock Samsung to CM12/13?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do u know the difference between WIndows Phone/iPhone and Android, that's the kind of comparison u can use between Stock and CM.
Stock is the cute "little" thing with mostly everything that u may need ready to go.
CM is the smaller in size, much faster and with options to do almost anything u could think in a device.
aaronadams74 said:
i think i messed my t817v. i rooted using odin, and cannot figure out what to do next. it tries to install but gives error message, also my tab wont charge, and when hooked into odin it keeps "adding then removed" over and over again... now i have a tablet that does not work.
any help on this would be awesome.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Was this ever fixed?
Why does the SM-T815 run in 32bit mode, even under CM13?
I looked through the forums to try and get an answer to this but most of the posts on it are a year old or older. I'm wondering if there is a way to get the Camera 2 API on a Note 4. Would upgrading from Lollipop to Marshmallo do it? Or perhaps another ROM? I'm just hoping that something has changed in the last 12 months.
Nothing changed, Developers are not interested (or) can't able to port the camera 2 API.
Thank you!
scorpienez said:
Nothing changed, Developers are not interested (or) can't able to port the camera 2 API.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, that's what I thought but I figured I'd check. It's the one thing that will probably get me to choose another brand when I replace the phone. It's too bad because I probably wouldn't get a replacement any time soon if I could get manual controls on the camera.
why only samsung could change this ?
Samsung
rationmyrum said:
why only samsung could change this ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That I don't know. If you have a way to get this done, I'd love to know.
Hi
As most of us all know that oreo roms are stable and giving good results.but all roms lack Ok Google feature when screen is off.and no one seems to fix it i wonder is it because its difficult or simply because people don't find it compelling enough.
What if i wanted to fix this issue? What would be a good start in the right direction?
Also if any one knows or has info that can help please share.
Thanks
Sanabil said:
Hi
As most of us all know that oreo roms are stable and giving good results.but all roms lack Ok Google feature when screen is off.and no one seems to fix it i wonder is it because its difficult or simply because people don't find it compelling enough.
What if i wanted to fix this issue? What would be a good start in the right direction?
Also if any one knows or has info that can help please share.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Moto Z Play on 7.1.1 does not have "OK Google" with screen off and it's completely stock. Is there an example of a phone with "OK Google" working with the screen off?
Guapo613 said:
My Moto Z Play on 7.1.1 does not have "OK Google" with screen off and it's completely stock. Is there an example of a phone with "OK Google" working with the screen off?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro almost all nexus phones have this functionality to activate Ok Google from screen off. I do not know about other manufacturers though but i think it can be turned on in most phones via voice or assistant settings.
Sanabil said:
Hi
As most of us all know that oreo roms are stable and giving good results.but all roms lack Ok Google feature when screen is off.and no one seems to fix it i wonder is it because its difficult or simply because people don't find it compelling enough.
What if i wanted to fix this issue? What would be a good start in the right direction?
Also if any one knows or has info that can help please share.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't fixed it for LineageOS, because I didn't know where to start.
Additionaly it's not very important for me.
Elektroschmock said:
I haven't fixed it for LineageOS, because I didn't know where to start.
Additionaly it's not very important for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh i see ? well in that case what do you suggest?
may be this feature is useful for some, like myself.
And it will be nice to see it in !
Sanabil said:
Oh i see well in that case what do you suggest?
may be this feature is useful for some, like myself.
And it will be nice to see it in !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My suggestion?
Fix it
I know this isn't very helpful, but I really don't know what changed with O and why it isn't working any more.
Perhaps you can start to find out why shamu's custom TriggerTraining.apk isn't launched anymore like it used to be on N.
Elektroschmock said:
My suggestion?
Fix it
I know this isn't very helpful, but I really don't know what changed with O and why it isn't working any more.
Perhaps you can start to find out why shamu's custom TriggerTraining.apk isn't launched anymore like it used to be on N.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:laugh: ok let's see.
Elektroschmock said:
My suggestion?
Fix it
I know this isn't very helpful, but I really don't know what changed with O and why it isn't working any more.
Perhaps you can start to find out why shamu's custom TriggerTraining.apk isn't launched anymore like it used to be on N.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You see i am no developer, but i see your statement gives hints and certain clues to what to look for. ?
I searched and found a thread on xda from 2016 , Op was suggesting to modify build.prop via text editor , so changed device name to pixel xl , finally rebooted
AAAaanddddd
It didn't worked ?
Back to more searching,
Sanabil said:
I searched and found a thread on xda from 2016 , Op was suggesting to modify build.prop via text editor , so changed device name to pixel xl , finally rebooted
AAAaanddddd
It didn't worked
Back to more searching,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it was that easy it would have been fixed already.
Elektroschmock said:
If it was that easy it would have been fixed already.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can i ask you something?
All the devs who put out such ROMs can't they just debug or know where code requires modification.??
Also do you know a coder or dev that you think has a chance of doing it.
Thanks
Sanabil said:
Can i ask you something?
All the devs who put out such ROMs can't they just debug or know where code requires modification.??
Also do you know a coder or dev that you think has a chance of doing it.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know what you think who those devs are. I did the oreo bringup for shamu, but I am a hardware developer and my software skills are very limited.
Additionally all devs do it in their free time and for fun. If a feature is not implemented or not fixed then there is a high chance that nobody is interested or able to fix it.
If you want it working then you should learn to debug and to code.
Elektroschmock said:
I don't know what you think who those devs are. I did the oreo bringup for shamu, but I am a hardware developer and my software skills are very limited.
Additionally all devs do it in their free time and for fun. If a feature is not implemented or not fixed then there is a high chance that nobody is interested or able to fix it.
If you want it working then you should learn to debug and to code.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro i meant no disrespect to any dev who do such work, i appreciate their hard work . I also realize that they take special time to do such work.I didn't knew much about how its all done. But since you explained, i thank you.
And i think as you mentioned i will look into it myself. :good:
Today i used nokia 6.1 with Android Oreo 8.1 , i checked its assistant and to my surprise it too did not supported ok Google function with screen off.
So my guess is that its more of an Android 8.1 change , they have limited this functionality to certain phones.
This means it is not a bug, and needs some custom coding or programming/modification to make it work again .
Well i think i am isolated but i shall continue to find what ever i can and post .
I read on Reddit post of this problem and a user posted build prop trick where one tricks the Nexus 6 into thinking its a pixel device.
I tried but it didn't worked and also camera app crashed too. Voice match remains greyd out , it did how ever at first showed sign that its working but nope upon real testing it failed.
I then tried switching name to nexus 6p and it enabled one option which was previously greyd out, it allowed me to record and voice and asked for pin to use voice match but then disabled 'use ok google from any screen' option. .... and camera was not working too..
Is it the right direction? perhaps..perhaps not.
Update:
This issue is definitely from Google's server side, the voice match issue is not present on nexus 5 and nexus 7 tablet. here is a thread of ongoing discussion.
https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/nexus/0GmbO8FgvQg;context-place=forum/nexus
I think Google decided to ditch ok Google screen off functionality altogether from Nexus 6. There tech team never responded to the complaints mad by users. So it's kinda dead now.
Sanabil said:
I think Google decided to ditch ok Google screen off functionality altogether from Nexus 6. There tech team never responded to the complaints mad by users. So it's kinda dead now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been looking for a solution to this. I spent a weekend last month flashing various 8.1 and 7.1.X roms and trying to renable it. Same story every time. Apparently Google's just decided we don't get to use this feature anymore. I'm gonna start playing with other assistants (Cortana, Alexa, Hound, Autovoice) and see if any work like we want Assistant to.
lpjunior999 said:
I've been looking for a solution to this. I spent a weekend last month flashing various 8.1 and 7.1.X roms and trying to renable it. Same story every time. Apparently Google's just decided we don't get to use this feature anymore. I'm gonna start playing with other assistants (Cortana, Alexa, Hound, Autovoice) and see if any work like we want Assistant to.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wish you best of luck bro . ?
Has anyone tried this on a 100% stock, unrooted device? I got Google One for being a good Local Guide, and Google Customer Support says root may cause this. I'm going to try Magisk Hide and report back.