Database Users

Antutu Benchmark?

Anyone else? I got 67,240 in 64bit mode on first and over 68k in 2nd. Finally figured out the screen shot.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

aaronc_98 said:
Anyone else? I got 62,740 in 64bit mode.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW....Screenshot?

Hrm... that's actually a little on the low side compared to some of the numbers it was putting up on review units. Most of those I saw were hovering around 70,000.
Definitely curious to see what other folks pull.

aaronc_98 said:
Anyone else? I got 62,740 in 64bit mode.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not brave enough to install that unsigned apk. I did score almost 58k in the standard antututu. Too be honest both these numbers are a lot lower then what I was thinking. Most of the results were on par with the exynos 5420 other then the mali gpu which scored nearly 20k (double the 5420 mali). Even the storage io numbers weren't radically different Despite their claims of high performance internal storage.
Anyways benchmarks usually only tell a small part of the story and there could be other things at play here that I have yet to discover. I'm hoping we see kernel source for this device soon.

I think this kind of benchmark is more useful and interesting as it correlates with something in real-life, like actual use of the device:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHb6IlmmV2o

Here's mine for those that care.

Do you have any battery temperature readings when running the Antutu?

Hehe, I see there was a typo in your original measurement
Good stuff. Looks like the retail units are definitely up to snuff. Keep em coming guys.

Poetique said:
Hehe, I see there was a typo in your original measurement
Good stuff. Looks like the retail units are definitely up to snuff. Keep em coming guys.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I went back and edited it cuz I saw I'm a bit dyslexic apparently...

this was the very first run in 64 bit mode, non 64 bit was 64508,

67282 with 64bit, sorry that is such a large screenshot

Here is my score, with all my apps installed 37+!

iGordy101 said:
Here is my score, with all my apps installed 37+!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It really is a beast! My friend has this phone, but I have the HTC M9 and it only gets 60927 on AnTuTu. In fairness though, the CPU only goes up to 1.5 GHz on little core + 2.0 GHz on the big core while Exynos has it 1.6+2.2 and 20 nm process

theveterans said:
It really is a beast! My friend has this phone, but I have the HTC M9 and it only gets 60927 on AnTuTu. In fairness though, the CPU only goes up to 1.5 GHz on little core + 2.0 GHz on the big core while Exynos has it 1.6+2.2 and 20 nm process
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah man, this is really a beast and so beautiful!

theveterans said:
It really is a beast! My friend has this phone, but I have the HTC M9 and it only gets 60927 on AnTuTu. In fairness though, the CPU only goes up to 1.5 GHz on little core + 2.0 GHz on the big core while Exynos has it 1.6+2.2 and 20 nm process
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the qualcomm 810 is 20nm process, exynos is 14nm

Everything stock, out of the box

lowest i scored is 67.5k, highest is around 69.5

---------- Post added at 10:45 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:43 AM ----------
And on a better day

Andi1000 said:
Everthing stock, out of the box
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I think I got the highest score than any phone I ever owned on stock out of the box near 80000 hahah I was so scared lol

Out of box, playstore app full update, latest ITV (Vodafone) update

Redmi Note 2 benchmarks, and general performance thread

Hi, can anyone do few benchmarks and also point out MIUI version?
1. Please install Geekbench + Androbench, reboot the phone, turn off everything from background (apps and such) and do Androbench first, then Geekbench.
2. Please install PC Mark for Android, turn off everything from behind and post the results.
3. Feel free to add any benchmarks you like, thanks!
Also report about performance in app, smoothness, load times on big apps, and general performance.

dazed1 said:
Hi, can anyone do few benchmarks and also point out MIUI version?
1. Please install Geekbench + Androbench, reboot the phone, turn off everything from background (apps and such) and do Androbench first, then Geekbench.
2. Please install PC Mark for Android, turn off everything from behind and post the results.
3. Feel free to add any benchmarks you like, thanks!
Also report about performance in app, smoothness, load times on big apps, and general performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi!I did it.
RedMi Note2 (16GB)
MIUI Ver.:6.7.2.0 Stable CN Rom
Androbench
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
GeekBench3
PC Mark
3D Mark Icestorm Unlimited
3D Mark Slingshot happened unknown error...

Thanks so much!

So how do these numbers compare to other phones?

Actually regarding price, they are very good!

I assume you have the 16gb model? How much usable storage space is left?

FloatingFatMan said:
I assume you have the 16gb model? How much usable storage space is left?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't tell you exactly because I have installed a few apps and I do not feel like resetting it atm! But I would guess just over 10gb free space.

what I am wondering is if there is any actual difference in performance between this and the prime version and also if this one can be overclocked to match the primes performance if there is any difference.. I would be interested in seeing youtube videos on this phone .. but there is nothing out there yet..

b3ava said:
what I am wondering is if there is any actual difference in performance between this and the prime version and also if this one can be overclocked to match the primes performance if there is any difference.. I would be interested in seeing youtube videos on this phone .. but there is nothing out there yet..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like 5-10% MAX difference, do not bother about it if you don't need the storage.

FloatingFatMan said:
I assume you have the 16gb model? How much usable storage space is left?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes,16GB ver. I reset my device and checked storage. After resetting, available storage is 10.72GB. After uninstalling Chinese apps, available storage is 11.4GB.

Could you unintelligible the Chinese apps as any other app or do you need root or any uninstaller app?

the benchmark of XIAOMI REDMI NOTE 2

Please avoid antutu, Geekbench is much better, and PC Mark Android....

What mainstream phones is the Redmi Note 2 Prime comparable to?
I'd like to upgrade from my dead Galaxy Note 2 and am looking for something inexpensive but that's still an upgrade in specs.

I found a nice long review here with more benchmarks and info on the device: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uR_la5ngaco
I didn't know about dragon glass, so apparently it is comparable to the old Gorilla Glass 2, which is what I had on my G2, and which is the reason I have the RN2 now so I will make sure I don't drop it again: http://agcem.com/index.php/dragontrail/15-cover-glass
There are also two reviews on Youtube with people doing scratch tests.

Can anyone do javascript benchmarks for me with the latest google chrome browser version?
-sunspider http://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider/sunspider.html
-google octane http://chromium.github.io/octane/

Helen423 said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That are some nice numbers.
But is that the 2.0ghz version or the prime 2.2ghz?

16 GO version

xiaomi redmi note 2 benchmark
magin1 said:
That are some nice numbers.
But is that the 2.0ghz version or the prime 2.2ghz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi, the score in benchmark is the same in the 2.0ghz version and the prime 2.2ghz. i hope it helps!

Hi,
Somebody to post a screen of Basemark OS II ? Thank you.

In what Countries did fire(s) occur?

It seems to me that if all of the defective batteries were in Asia (as it appears from News), then we are dealing with both a different processor than the one employed in North America. Believe US has Snapdragon and rest of World Exynos. There is a difference, I have read, between the ability of the two processors to "regulate" voltage and prevent battery from overheating.
Secondly, we have A/C 120 current in the States - believe that Europe and Asia have D/C 220.
So, unless the defective batteries were found both in States and Euro/Asia, then perhaps it is the processor and/or the type of current that is exacerbating the problem(s).

prubin said:
It seems to me that if all of the defective batteries were in Asia (as it appears from News), then we are dealing with both a different processor than the one employed in North America. Believe US has Snapdragon and rest of World Exynos. There is a difference, I have read, between the ability of the two processors to "regulate" voltage and prevent battery from overheating.
Secondly, we have A/C 120 current in the States - believe that Europe and Asia have D/C 220.
So, unless the defective batteries were found both in States and Euro/Asia, then perhaps it is the processor and/or the type of current that is exacerbating the problem(s).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have yet to read of any snapdragon ones bursting. So this is possible.

prubin said:
It seems to me that if all of the defective batteries were in Asia (as it appears from News), then we are dealing with both a different processor than the one employed in North America. Believe US has Snapdragon and rest of World Exynos. There is a difference, I have read, between the ability of the two processors to "regulate" voltage and prevent battery from overheating.
Secondly, we have A/C 120 current in the States - believe that Europe and Asia have D/C 220.
So, unless the defective batteries were found both in States and Euro/Asia, then perhaps it is the processor and/or the type of current that is exacerbating the problem(s).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not related to CPU.
Related to battery manufacturing.

First report I've seen in the US. https://www.google.com/amp/boston.c...ll-phone-explodes-winthrop/amp/?client=safari
Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk

TriumphGuy said:
First report I've seen in the US. https://www.google.com/amp/boston.c...ll-phone-explodes-winthrop/amp/?client=safari
Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not even a Note 7 and an aftermarket charge cable was being used.

You should call the fireman and let him know he's wrong.
Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk

TriumphGuy said:
You should call the fireman and let him know he's wrong.
Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would be more beneficial than that "news" source broadcasting incorrect information.
It's an S6 Active. Those are Active model buttons and camo back.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

TriumphGuy said:
You should call the fireman and let him know he's wrong.
Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, that is not a Note 7

I actually tried to call them about that. Why would a s6 active catch on fire though?
TriumphGuy said:
First report I've seen in the US. https://www.google.com/amp/boston.c...ll-phone-explodes-winthrop/amp/?client=safari
Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
holywhitebread said:
It's not even a Note 7 and an aftermarket charge cable was being used.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
TriumphGuy said:
You should call the fireman and let him know he's wrong.
Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
holywhitebread said:
It would be more beneficial than that "news" source broadcasting incorrect information.
It's an S6 Active. Those are Active model buttons and camo back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N930A using Tapatalk

Not all htc u11 phones have ufs 2.1 !

Update : i managed to go above 700mb/s after restarting the phone! Htc is right sorry guys my bad
My htc u11 has ufs 2.0 and htc claims that all htc u11 models have ufs 2.1 !! Beware guys. To know which type you have you should download androbench and see if your sequential read is below or above 700mb/s

adi.97 said:
My htc u11 has ufs 2.0 and htc claims that all htc u11 models have ufs 2.1 !! Beware guys. To know which type you have you should download androbench and see if your sequential read is below or above 700mb/s
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine is 703.3 what does it mean?
Tried again 720mb/s

Thanks for the warning. Luckily I have a 2.1 version 710 read speed.

Or you can do this
https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s8/how-to/ufs-2-0-2-1-identify-flash-chip-s8-t3601656
Sent from my HTC U11 using XDA-Developers Legacy app

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC U11 using XDA-Developers Legacy app

my is 2.1

fake news

711, 698, 701....so what does this mean?

jhill110 said:
711, 698, 701....so what does this mean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing. Op is wrong.
Sent from my HTC U11 using XDA-Developers Legacy app

I'll bite. Here's the terminal output of my U11.
Hynix H2U88301AMR UFS2.1
Sent from my HTC U11 using Tapatalk

doyou37 said:
fake news
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely.
Seems someone can't live up to the fakt that other OEMs are mucking around their customers with respect to storage specifications, while HTC doesn't.
Sent from my htc_pmeuhl using XDA Labs

HTC never lie.
The lier is sumsung. Because they send cheap quality exynus with ufs 2 in Middle East.
I have dual SIM HTC U11 phone and as you see there is no difference with European modul.
Sent from my HTC U11 using Tapatalk

There is an app in playstore ufs check for samsung, but it works for htc also

It's not healthy to compare with measuring with sequential read. Our HTC U11 phones have UFS 2.1, because the producer company of 3D NAND based on UFS 2.1 is SKhynix and Model: H28U88301AMR, you can check it below that:

For me is sumsung hfs 2.1
What's difference?
Sumsung send Galaxy phone with ufs 2 in middle East.
Sent from my HTC U11 using Tapatalk

Ufs 2.1
Is there a problem with me? Although I have repeatedly tested it, I have never seen 700 MB / s! ?

gokhanknc1 said:
Is there a problem with me? Although I have repeatedly tested it, I have never seen 700 MB / s! ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No
Sent from my HTC U11 using XDA-Developers Legacy app

riggsandroid said:
No
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why are my scores low; compared to others?

gokhanknc1 said:
Why are my scores low; compared to others?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The chip in your phone is UFS 2.1.
This thread is fud. Should be deleted.

There should be several types, and from what I saw:
SKhynix H28U88301 AMR 128G
Samsung KLUCG4J1ED-B0C1 64G
Samsung KLUDG8V1EE-B0C1 128G
All of them are UFS2.1.
Not sure if HTC also uses the 64G one from SKhynix.
There was a claim saying the SKhynix 128G is slower than the Samsung 64G. I checked post but they didn't mention how they tested it. Also the difference is not significant (less than 10%).
Also attach a screenshot from Samsung Product Selection Guide pg.14.
And some screenshots of my DTWL 128G.

Really low antutu score.

I Just got lg g6 that is brand new from a trusted shop (europe version H870) And im getting around 87000~ score in antutu.
3D score:38454
UX:26301
CPU: 16900
RAM: 5654
Any suggestions? I checked the IMEI number, and everything is alright.
I also cleaned most of the bloatware. But i don't know what else to do.

P760x said:
I Just got lg g6 that is brand new from a trusted shop (europe version H870) And im getting around 87000~ score in antutu.
3D score:38454
UX:26301
CPU: 16900
RAM: 5654
Any suggestions? I checked the IMEI number, and everything is alright.
I also cleaned most of the bloatware. But i don't know what else to do.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, I have no idea. My one month old LG G6 H870DS originally scored 105000, but with the latest firmware scores 150500.

Mine scores around 150K. Make sure your device isn't hot when you do the benchmark.

ppp10 said:
Sorry, I have no idea. My one month old LG G6 H870DS originally scored 105000, but with the latest firmware scores 150500.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Latest firmware? Did it got a new update?

EvilHowl said:
Mine scores around 150K. Make sure your device isn't hot when you do the benchmark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow. That actually worked lol. Thank you for the tip! Now im getting 142000 without any updates.

I did a test underwater and this is the result. Usually i get around 120k
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my LG-H870 using Tapatalk

simo14 said:
I did a test underwater and this is the result. Usually i get around 120k
Sent from my LG-H870 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's the room temperature where you test it? That's only just a bit better than "usual" results.

bv90andy said:
What's the room temperature where you test it? That's only just a bit better than "usual" results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
About 21°C
Sent from my LG-H870 using Tapatalk

I get 140k with EU version (H870) which is normal. Also most ppl don't realize the score is a lot lower if you're benching while charging. At least with H870.

simo14 said:
About 21°C
Sent from my LG-H870 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My room is at 18°C and my score was 141k. It probably also depends how much you were using it before the benchmark, how hot it was, whether it had just been charged which increases the phone's core temperature, etc.

LG - H870
Im not sure why, but i get 164k under normal conditions.

Just before started to charge the battery, normal test, without any clearing data or preparation of using cold water or whatever
This is the new Antutu benchmark? Half Year ago, it looked different, i remember.
145558
Sorry for your Problem, of course there is something wrong. How does it feel, using it daily, stuttering?
Maybe you have the Q6 instead of G6 ?

ric84 said:
Just before started to charge the battery, normal test, without any clearing data or preparation of using cold water or whatever
This is the new Antutu benchmark? Half Year ago, it looked different, i remember.
145558
Sorry for your Problem, of course there is something wrong. How does it feel, using it daily, stuttering?
Maybe you have the Q6 instead of G6 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LG Q6 wouldn't get anywhere near 160k. 160k is what I usually get on my G6. This phone runs hot though.