I want to preface this with the fact that I have run several roms over the course of my time spent in rooting and flashing. Out of all of the roms, CM12.1 is the most stable and currently runs the fastest. I'm wondering if the Note 7 or S7/S7E ports will be able to handle overclocking because every time I have tried, the device will reboot. If I can't get these types of roms to be stable and fast, I won't be able to test them with Antutu benchmark. That said, I'm wondering if there is anyone who has a higher score than this. If so, what rom did you use and how stable is it?
I should note that I am currently using these specs:
-ROM: CM12.1
-Kernel: IdleKernel
-Screen Size: 2560 X 1440 (My phone seems to handle this incredibly well, though I can't quite get it up to 4K without having problems.)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The Killing Joke said:
If I can't get these types of roms to be stable and fast, I won't be able to test them with Antutu benchmark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, this joke is really killing me...
Dejan Sathanas said:
Yeah, this joke is really killing me...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The questions were posed because I want to know if anyone has had better luck than I did. I'm merely curious as to what the limits are of this type of phone.
The Killing Joke said:
The questions were posed because I want to know if anyone has had better luck than I did. I'm merely curious as to what the limits are of this type of phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This score means nothing if you do not specify used cpu governor, hotplug driver, i/o scheduler and o.c value.
With an S7E port (default settings, no optimizations and no OC), i can get +62K and a 3D score higher than yours.
zlazaar said:
This score means nothing if you do not specify used cpu governor, hotplug driver, i/o scheduler and o.c value.
With an S7E port (default settings, no optimizations and no OC), i can get +62K and a 3D score higher than yours.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As expected, most N7/S7E ports will have a higher 3D value than CM. The govenor I used was interactive. Overclocked to 2.76 ghz, gpu was also overclocked to 450 mhz. I chose not to mess with the i/o scheduler. Hotplugging was turned off.
The Killing Joke said:
As expected, most N7/S7E ports will have a higher 3D value than CM. The govenor I used was interactive. Overclocked to 2.76 ghz, gpu was also overclocked to 450 mhz. I chose not to mess with the i/o scheduler. Hotplugging was turned off.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, if you are satisfied with your rom so keep it.
Anyway, in raw speed Touchwiz can't compete with CM/AOSP.
A little tip for higher score : use Fiops schedular with read ahead buffer = 256kb
Related
Hi, today i've installed quadrant benchmark app, my nexus one score is very low, only 770, it's behind n1 with 2.2, droid x and galaxy s...i'm wondering why! My flashed rom is this one:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=714184
1351 for Me. Do you have a lot of windows open on your browser?
maybe is time for a different room
1520 on CM V6.0.0-RC2
1495 for CM 6.0.0 RC2
mrbkkt1 said:
1351 for Me. Do you have a lot of windows open on your browser?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tried after a reboot and nothing changes...
that rom is a stock with few mods, it's very strange!
Did you do the Pandora/streaming music audio quality fix? If so that causes your phone to score a lot lower in quadrant. In the benchmark it checks ACC encoding and decoding, and the fix for the audio quality causes those two tests to run significantly slower. Even so, the general speed of the phone is unaffected.
1748 on rod's rom with wildmonks kernel
+1 to the "get CM6 RC2" recommendations. I am on it, and I scored 1542 on my 1.113 GHz N1 running CM6RC2, with SetCPU on "interactive."
1657 on Kang-O-Rama 1.0b1 SP1
Flashed to Wildmonk's latest 800mV BFS kernel, and I got 1805. This is a very nice kernel!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
ManticoreX said:
Did you do the Pandora/streaming music audio quality fix? If so that causes your phone to score a lot lower in quadrant. In the benchmark it checks ACC encoding and decoding, and the fix for the audio quality causes those two tests to run significantly slower. Even so, the general speed of the phone is unaffected.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude you found the point
Now i must found out how to remove that fix, that i don't even need
well if that affect just the score of the benchmark i don't mind keeping it as it is obviously!
Vanilla Nexus One, except iR Kernel, latest .34, 900-something mV.
1577 on Quadrant. SetCPU on userspace, 998 Mhz min and max.
Glad that solved it. I'm not sure why this thread became a pissing contest for people's benchmark scores. Anyways the fix shouldn't provide any real world slowdown as far as I know of, and it makes Pandora sound a heck of a lot better.
I'm almost getting 1800 quadrant..
are you sure you're running on Android 2.2? I think 2.1 got these low scores
ManticoreX said:
Glad that solved it. I'm not sure why this thread became a pissing contest for people's benchmark scores. Anyways the fix shouldn't provide any real world slowdown as far as I know of, and it makes Pandora sound a heck of a lot better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But i don't use pandora, so who cares?
I've posted this problem in the thread of the rom i use and the dev have already posted a new version that remove that fix (removing a fix for fixing a bug)
1477 was the highest score I got.
Stock Froyo.
Perhaps the Quadrant Utility tool for Benchmarking needs an upgrade - the screen size is too large yet the speed test (FPS) is hidden under the screen's bottom partly.
The note must be pretty quick!
Anyways - I scored a benchmark of 4013! This was achieved after ensuring that task manager had all apps exited and memory cleared.
Update: On my third benchmark in a row I got 4308. You may check my blogs later today as I upload all the performance images.
the note is pretty good. samsung did a good job of optimising the drivers, and the GPU is surprisingly more powerful than my atrix despite the higher resolution.
Quadrant doesn't need an upgrade - it needs throwing in the bin!
It's a deeply flawed benchmark that tells you pretty much nothing about the overall performance of your device.
Regards,
Dave
I got a score of 4600 using an Interactive governor on a kernel I rolled. This makes it awesomely faster than my paltry Nexus One . Shame Quadrant is pretty meaningless as a cross-device benchmark though....
foxmeister said:
Quadrant doesn't need an upgrade - it needs throwing in the bin!
It's a deeply flawed benchmark that tells you pretty much nothing about the overall performance of your device.
Regards,
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have a better app to suggest?
rdosti said:
Do you have a better app to suggest?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AnTuTu maybe?
Got an awesome 4395! I'm amazed by the phone's performance on Benchmarks, yet I find it just as fast as my HTC sensation on the usual day to day usage. hope updates will improve speed!
Vellamo by Qualcomm
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
kunalparwani said:
AnTuTu maybe?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which app do you use to overclock??
i dont remember exactly how much i got with quadrant, but with antutu i reached ~7050 score with criskelo ics rom v2, ondemand 500-1.4ghz ;D
Darky, franco kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
MfG a_halodri
RocketRom v23
Sent from my GT-N7000
How do you get such awesome numbers?
I got 2810 on my stock deodexed LA6 ,and 3691 on cm9 v3
I do nothing. Only flashed Darky Rom and Franco kernel v10.
MfG a_halodri
MR.change said:
How do you get such awesome numbers?
I got 2810 on my stock deodexed LA6 ,and 3691 on cm9 v3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing much really RocketRom with Franco #8 kernel. That's it
Sent from my GT-N7000
It is the kernel from Franco, he is great:thumbup:
MfG a_halodri
Given with the release of Dorimanx 3.4D just out giving some amazing results on various roms id thought I'd share my setup and let people share there's
So 1st off with the following setup I got this.
Scaling Max CPU =1500mhz
Cpu gov (awake) = smartass v2
Gpu steps = 200 267 400 mhz
Gpu voltages = 800mv 850mv 900mv
This was on Neatrom lite 1.0
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
And this on Rootbox 1.2
Sent from my awesome GT-I9100 Rom : Neat Lite - Kernal : Dorimanx
Which app do you use for benchmarking.
I constantly see the benchmark pics, like the ones of you, and I'm really interested in the performance of my GS2.
Cr3ck3r5 said:
Which app do you use for benchmarking.
I constantly see the benchmark pics, like the ones of you, and I'm really interested in the performance of my GS2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He uses Quadrant for benchmarking.
Here you go mate : https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.aurorasoftworks.quadrant.ui.standard&hl=fr
have fun
i/o scheduler
What I/O Scheduler are you using??
Sio
Sent from my Awesome GT-I9100 Rom: Rootbox Kernal: Dorimanx
You need to up you gpu voltage those values are way too low for stability
duykhang524 said:
You need to up you gpu voltage those values are way too low for stability
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me only stabilize gpu 400 at 1150mV
@ Dream.
Did you get any better bench scores since Dori keeps updating and we're at version 5.84 already??
Just curious
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Swachhand95 said:
What I/O Scheduler are you using??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Governor = Hyper
I/O = SIO
Max = 1.3 GHz
Min = 200 MHz
well i got my nexus 7 a few days ago and im enjoying it so far. my question is this: are the quadrant scores supposed to be low? im getting 3450, well below the asus transformer and htc one x. is this normal or is it just me?
edward650 said:
well i got my nexus 7 a few days ago and im enjoying it so far. my question is this: are the quadrant scores supposed to be low? im getting 3450, well below the asus transformer and htc one x. is this normal or is it just me?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
stock? testing at what speed? if your stock, that means you are benching at highest/lowest cpu, not highest/highest. which lets your device scale. quadrant doesnt tax your device enough for all four cores to kick in, i bet its even only benching with one core too. theres no way to know what cpu speed or how many cores are being used in the benchmark, so your scores will be random at best. root it, set your cpu speed to highest/highest, turn off tegra hotplug so that all four cores are used, then benchmark.
simms22 said:
stock? testing at what speed? if your stock, that means you are benching at highest/lowest cpu, not highest/highest. which lets your device scale. quadrant doesnt tax your device enough for all four cores to kick in, i bet its even only benching with one core too. theres no way to know what cpu speed or how many cores are being used in the benchmark, so your scores will be random at best. root it, set your cpu speed to highest/highest, turn off tegra hotplug so that all four cores are used, then benchmark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes stock and unrooted. well this answered my question! thank you very much
simms22 said:
stock? testing at what speed? if your stock, that means you are benching at highest/lowest cpu, not highest/highest. which lets your device scale. quadrant doesnt tax your device enough for all four cores to kick in, i bet its even only benching with one core too. theres no way to know what cpu speed or how many cores are being used in the benchmark, so your scores will be random at best. root it, set your cpu speed to highest/highest, turn off tegra hotplug so that all four cores are used, then benchmark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How do you turn off tegra hotplug?
sayeef said:
How do you turn off tegra hotplug?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the kernel you are using has to have the option to do so built into it(most custom kernels do). for example..
tegra hotplug on(default)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
all four cores are active
two cores active
also, turning of fsync will increase benchmark score(especially i/o)
Hey folks! Yeah, it's another Benchmark thread. Except I tend to really like Vellamo when compared to Basemark, Antutu, Geekbench, etc. It's developed by Qualcomm themselves. I usually don't care about benchmarks, but I'm curious to see how other configurations perform on this suite.
Vellamo measures shear CPU and Memory performance with a suite of different tools and algorithms. The benchmarks don't take forever, the UI is clean and well thought out, the results can be compared with other devices and there are even super in-depth performance results and charts to look at if you're into that sort of thing.
I figured I would start this thread to see who can get the highest score in the three different benchmarks this App has to offer. Especially now that Nougat is out, I'm curious to see which OS performs better, which ROMs, browsers, kernels, etc. Grab the app off the Play Store and post your scores below! Feel free to use my post as a template.
ROM: Stock Android Nougat
Kernel: Phasma R25
Browser: Chrome 52
CPU Governor Used: Performance (OnDemand for Multi-Core)
I/O Schedule: Zen (256kb Readahead)
Extreme v4 Thermal Throttling Tweak used
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
NOTE: You can't use the Performance Governor for the Multi-Core Benchmark. It'll throw an error during one of the tests because one of the tests is meant to see how a CPU governor reacts to different loads. The Performance governor doesn't do that that at all, it just sets the CPU to the highest frequency. I recommend OnDemand for this test. You WILL get a higher score as a result.
For comparison, I ran a second benchmark with a more practical setup. The results below are from the same exact config but using the HawkTail 1.2 Governor Profile (Interactive CPU governor).
First try...
Stock N, rootless, no animations, killed background apps
Joms_US said:
Stock N, rootless, no animations, killed background apps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting that our Single Core and Browser results can be so different. Mind telling me what CPU governor, I/O Scheduler, Readahead Value, etc. you used during the tests?
Alcolawl said:
Interesting that our Single Core and Browser results can be so different. Mind telling me what CPU governor, I/O Scheduler, Readahead Value, etc. you used during the tests?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whatever is the default for stock N, that is what was used I guess. I am not using any custom ROM, governor, kernel etc. for my phone.
ROM: Pure Nexus
Kernel: ElementalX
Browser: Chrome 52
CPU Governor Used: Interactive (HawkTail 1.2)
I/O Schedule: fiops (512kb Readahead)
Scores below
manpildo said:
ROM: Pure Nexus
Kernel: ElementalX
Browser: Chrome 52
CPU Governor Used: Interactive (HawkTail 1.2)
I/O Schedule: fiops (512kb Readahead)
Scores below
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I changed my phone to HawkTail 1.2 (which is what I usually use anyways) and got these results. The results in grey are the results I got running Performance / OnDemand.