Ownice Android 6.0 Cortex-A53 MT3562 8Core - Android Head-Units

I have seen new Android 6.0 units with 4G built in. Both from Ownice. But none with Intel SoC. One witch MT3562 Octa Core, ARM Cortex-A53, 1.5-1.8GHz (which Brand? Mediatek, Autochips or other ? ) http://www.ownice.com/Pro_Auto DVD GPS Navigation for 2din Universal_405.html
And on AliExpress the Android 6.0 only have a Quadcore Cortex-A53, 1.3-1.6GHz.
https://de.aliexpress.com/item/Owni..._1&btsid=a03fbe69-3548-4524-a414-3181e4069883
Have a Octacore A53 more Performance like the Intel ???
Knows anyone anything about the Processor manufactor ???
best regards
Stephan

MT = MediaTek
A53 is a pretty weak core. Better than those crappy rockchip, but won't be anything close to the intel.

Yes i think A53 is a good choice. Its a 64 bit CPU.
But MediaTek has no MT3562 CPU !!!

anyone order this? i have not seen anyone with a 6.0 device yet

I will wait for the Octa core from Ownice. Andi1203 http://forum.xda-developers.com/member.php?u=601422 has the new Pumpkin with 6.0 and is happy with this.

Is there any benchmarks on the A53 vs Intel vs the T3 Quad core? I'm so lost at all these HU's is there a WIKI readers digest of all the **** going on with these HU's

I think the new 2GB intel joying with 5.1.1 makes 21000 points at antutu. In the Joying Thread has anywhere make this.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=69640816&postcount=48
But another one had 24000 with Joying RK3188 1GB
I Think that the intel Atom wasent a good idea. i have it in my dual OS tablet and it is slow at 3GB RAM.

Stephan_R said:
I have seen new Android 6.0 units with 4G built in. Both from Ownice. But none with Intel SoC. One witch MT3562 Octa Core, ARM Cortex-A53, 1.5-1.8GHz (which Brand? Mediatek, Autochips or other ? ) http://www.ownice.com/Pro_Auto DVD GPS Navigation for 2din Universal_405.html
And on AliExpress the Android 6.0 only have a Quadcore Cortex-A53, 1.3-1.6GHz.
https://de.aliexpress.com/item/Owni..._1&btsid=a03fbe69-3548-4524-a414-3181e4069883
Have a Octacore A53 more Performance like the Intel ???
Knows anyone anything about the Processor manufactor ???
best regards
Stephan
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This forum is for MTCD units, so why are you posting in it when the post is about Ownice units ? !

typos1 said:
This forum is for MTCD units, so why are you posting in it when the post is about Ownice units ? !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ownice is manufactor. Is mtcd a manufactor?
Ok i have forget to ask in the first thred, is it a mtcd device ???
Anybody knows it ???
Do you know it ????
How can i get information if i doesent know where are the right place !!!

Stephan_R said:
Ownice is manufactor. Is mtcd a manufactor?
Ok i have forget to ask in the first thred, is it a mtcd device ???
Anybody knows it ???
Do you know it ????
How can i get information if i doesent know where are the right place !!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ownice threads are in the Android Auto General section.
MTC is the developer of all MTC units and Ownice is a manufacturer, no MTC devices have MTK processors, and if your unit is branded as "Ownice" its deffo not an MTC unit (MTCD is a type of MTC unit).

Stephan_R said:
Ownice is manufactor. Is mtcd a manufactor?
Ok i have forget to ask in the first thred, is it a mtcd device ???
Anybody knows it ???
Do you know it ????
How can i get information if i doesent know where are the right place !!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
System Settings --> About.
But more generally, ALL current MTC devices will either have a Rockchip RK3188 SoC, or an Intel SoFia x3-C3230RK.
No MediaTek. So this Ownice is definitely NOT an MTC.
MTC is the not so much the manufacturer (although I think that they do manufacture some), but mainly the designer of the MTC devices (i.e., schematics and firmware). About a dozen different manufacturers build their designs.

doitright said:
MTC is the not so much the manufacturer (although I think that they do manufacture some), but mainly the designer of the MTC devices (i.e., schematics and firmware). About a dozen different manufacturers build their designs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, youre right, as I said somewhere else today, MTC is the developer not the manufacturer - post edited.

But i dont have this system to look at system settings. Thats the reason for many of the questions !!!
Nobody has anywhere make specific information about all the new systems.
Ownice has no Mediatek !!!! This Number of CPU is unknown at Mediatek. Nobody know whats really inside !!!

Stephan_R said:
But i dont have this system to look at system settings. Thats the reason for many of the questions !!!
Nobody has anywhere make specific information about all the new systems.
Ownice has no Mediatek !!!! This Number of CPU is unknown at Mediatek. Nobody know whats really inside !!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Theyre deffo NOT MTC, so no MTC ROMs will work on it as Ownice is in the title they are Ownice units.
Ask the seller for a pic of the settings/about device screen, or Ownice if they make any MTK devices.
Both links you gave say the devices are MT processors, one would assume they mean "MTK" ie Mediatek.

Stephan_R said:
But i dont have this system to look at system settings. Thats the reason for many of the questions !!!
Nobody has anywhere make specific information about all the new systems.
Ownice has no Mediatek !!!! This Number of CPU is unknown at Mediatek. Nobody know whats really inside !!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It'll probably be an MT6753 with a little bit of dyslexia and too much drugs built in.
---------- Post added at 06:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:55 PM ----------
typos1 said:
Sorry, youre right, as I said somewhere else today, MTC is the developer not the manufacturer - post edited.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think your reply was actually in there yet when I hit the submit button.

doitright said:
It'll probably be an MT6753 with a little bit of dyslexia and too much drugs built in.
I don't think your reply was actually in there yet when I hit the submit button.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair enough, I did put manufacturer though
AFAIK MediaTek is usually abbreviated to "MTK".

typos1 said:
Fair enough, I did put manufacturer though
AFAIK MediaTek is usually abbreviated to "MTK".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perhaps as a manufacturer, but their SoC's ***part numbers*** follow the MTxxxx pattern;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaTek#Hexa-core.2C_octa-core_and_deca-core

This is a bit of a necro post, but I'm researching this stuff right now. From what I read, the clock speeds listed on the Ownice site make it seem more like an MT6752. Either way, the benchmarks seem to be a lot faster than the Sofia.

Stephan_R said:
But i dont have this system to look at system settings. Thats the reason for many of the questions !!!
Nobody has anywhere make specific information about all the new systems.
Ownice has no Mediatek !!!! This Number of CPU is unknown at Mediatek. Nobody know whats really inside !!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ownice (Ow!Nice!) is a manufacturer's (WinLink Technology Limited.) brand. Ownice c200 has Rockchip SoC. C300 has AC 83xx (MediaTek - AutoChips) SoC. etc.
Ownice c300 and Maisun MT 9932 has same SoC and firmware. The only big difference is MainUI. You can flash both firmware to each other.

mrtnb said:
Ownice (Ow!Nice!) is a manufacturer's (WinLink Technology Limited.) brand. Ownice c200 has Rockchip SoC. C300 has AC 83xx (MediaTek - AutoChips) SoC. etc.
Ownice c300 and Maisun MT 9932 has same SoC and firmware. The only big difference is MainUI. You can flash both firmware to each other.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's in the C500?

Related

HU with 2gb w/o Intel Sofia

Hi everyone,
I'm looking to buy my first HU and after reading the forums for a while I'm undecided what to pick.
It looks like the Intel Sofia platform is the current recommendation - it comes with 2gb, the CPU is powerful enough and it has some support for fastboot. However from what I can tell there's no custom ROM for it (Malaysk is only for RK3x88 series) which is kinda of a big minus for me (since one is at the mercy of the seller).
Am I missing something? From what I can tell the RK3188 and Sofia CPUs are more or less identical in terms of performance, the RAM being the big difference.
I'm looking for stability (not going to play games or videos on the HU - I just want waze and probably the radio) first so a slower, older CPU with a solid community and ROM behind it fits my list.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
selbyog said:
Hi everyone,
I'm looking to buy my first HU and after reading the forums for a while I'm undecided what to pick.
It looks like the Intel Sofia platform is the current recommendation - it comes with 2gb, the CPU is powerful enough and it has some support for fastboot. However from what I can tell there's no custom ROM for it (Malaysk is only for RK3x88 series) which is kinda of a big minus for me (since one is at the mercy of the seller).
Am I missing something? From what I can tell the RK3188 and Sofia CPUs are more or less identical in terms of performance, the RAM being the big difference.
I'm looking for stability (not going to play games or videos on the HU - I just want waze and probably the radio) first so a slower, older CPU with a solid community and ROM behind it fits my list.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Theres no "current recommendation", its all down to personal opinion. The Sofia units are ok (both MTCD and "009" versions), so are the Rockchip RK3188 MTCB/C/D ones which bring the benefit of custom ROMs. The Rockchip ones dont come with 2GB as standard and (in Lollipop guise at least) they need it, but that can be added relatively easily. However, the latest MTCD versions and Klyde's versions (probably MTCC but no ones sure at the mo) use the octacore Rockchip PX5 (RK3368) so should offer better performance than the Sofia or RK3188 units.
Your only option for custom ROMs at least at the moment are the RK3188 units. Another benefit of the MTCB/C type is that theres a particularly good audio mod that gives control of the audio chip to Android, although youd have to be able to solder to do it.
typos1 said:
Theres no "current recommendation", its all down to personal opinion. The Sofia units are ok (both MTCD and "009" versions), so are the Rockchip RK3188 MTCB/C/D ones which bring the benefit of custom ROMs. The Rockchip ones dont come with 2GB as standard and (in Lollipop guise at least) they need it, but that can be added relatively easily. However, the latest MTCD versions and Klyde's versions (probably MTCC but no ones sure at the mo) use the octacore Rockchip PX5 (RK3368) so should offer better performance than the Sofia or RK3188 units.
Your only option for custom ROMs at least at the moment are the RK3188 units. Another benefit of the MTCB/C type is that theres a particularly good audio mod that gives control of the audio chip to Android, although youd have to be able to solder to do it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the reply. Soldering extra RAM is not something I can do easy - I lack expertise and getting hardware in EU tends to be expensive and slow; I'd much rather pay extra (and wait) to have it built in the factory.
I'll keep an eye on the RK3368 boards.
Any idea whether these would be ROM friendly ?
selbyog said:
Thanks for the reply. Soldering extra RAM is not something I can do easy - I lack expertise and getting hardware in EU tends to be expensive and slow; I'd much rather pay extra (and wait) to have it built in the factory.
I'll keep an eye on the RK3368 boards.
Any idea whether these would be ROM friendly ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I m in the EU and I got my RAM for about $30 in the group buy, theres a thread open at the mo, they took 3 days to arrive. It would just be a case of finding somewhere to do the soldering for you, thats what most people have done.
If the Klyde PX5 units are MTCC it should mean that anyone with an MTCB or MTCC unit currently could simply change their SoM for a PX5 one, we just dont know yet (the original MTCB units were dual core RK3066 and a lot of people just upgraded their SoMs to the quadcore RK3188). Well, we dont know until someone buys one - theyve been on sale since November, but if they are MTCC an upgrade to a PX5 would be possible if you bought an MTCB or C RK3188 and upgraded the RAM, then youd be able to sell your RK3188 SoM with 2GB RAM as it would be quite sort after due to the extra RAM . . IF theyre MTCC that is.
All that may be a bit long winded for you but at least youd have access to a custom ROM as you wanted with the possibility of upgrading in the future to a version that is more likely to have support from current MTCB custom ROM makers (I m assuming theyd eventually upgrade to PX5 units themselves and start making ROMs for them).
Or you could just buy a Klyde PX5 unit now and have the most up to date unit, but with no custom ROMs support yet :
http://www.szklyde.com/bmw-android-car-dvd-player/38112008.html
If I sound MTCB/C biased, well I have 2 so I am. But from what I ve read the Sofia MTCD and 009 units are good too and at least theoretically easier to make a custom ROM for because Intel release their source code, unlike Rockchip. But no custom ROMs exist as yet.
Thanks again!
typos1 said:
I m in the EU
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool - where did you buy your units? Any with warehouses in EU?
typos1 said:
If I sound MTCB/C biased, well I have 2 so I am. But from what I ve read the Sofia MTCD and 009 units are good too and at least theoretically easier to make a custom ROM for because Intel release their source code, unlike Rockchip. But no custom ROMs exist as yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Klyde's unit indicates support for Android 6.0.1 while Intel's on 5.x and most MTCB on 4.x. Reading the forums I thought a MTCD board is required for android 5.x but it looks like that might not be the case - I guess in the end it depends on the manufacturer.
Btw, I read that one nice thing about Sofia is the fastboot feature which is not present on RK31xx/30xx units - not sure whether this is SoM or MCU specific. Do you have this feature on your units?
I like your idea about using an existing, tried-out platform (RK3188) with upgraded ram and custom ROM - it was my initial plan but the whole prospect was off putting.
I'll ask around to see how complicated/expensive would be to do the soldering.
Cheers,
selbyog said:
Thanks again!
Cool - where did you buy your units? Any with warehouses in EU?
Klyde's unit indicates support for Android 6.0.1 while Intel's on 5.x and most MTCB on 4.x. Reading the forums I thought a MTCD board is required for android 5.x but it looks like that might not be the case - I guess in the end it depends on the manufacturer.
Btw, I read that one nice thing about Sofia is the fastboot feature which is not present on RK31xx/30xx units - not sure whether this is SoM or MCU specific. Do you have this feature on your units?
I like your idea about using an existing, tried-out platform (RK3188) with upgraded ram and custom ROM - it was my initial plan but the whole prospect was off putting.
I'll ask around to see how complicated/expensive would be to do the soldering.
Cheers,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lollipop has been out for MTCB/C for about a year, this applies to ALL manufacturers and all RK3188 units, Klyde are the only ones who do Lollipop ROMs but the ROM can be used on ANY MTCB/C RK3188 device because they all use the same SoM. Some people find it laggy (I dont) but the 2GB RAM sorts that. Boot time is 20 - 30 seconds depending on what ROM you use, but there is no specific fast boot feature.
I did a group buy as ordering just 2 modules is expensive, but read the second RAM group buy thread in the MTCB hardware mod section and pm the guy who did it I think there may be some left.

New android radio octa core roll up

10.1 inch universal headunit v2 (not from carjoying)
Without the promised DSP unit
Android 6.0.1 marshmallow
Core 8x A53 @1.5 GHz MTCD
32 storage space
2 Gb Ram
Releasing march 2017 (Bestätigt)
https://youtu.be/FdsoOd0VpLI
Reserved for sidekicks infos
From surfer63
Intel stopped the Sofia line of development in April 2016. Intel stopped the collaboration with Rockchip completely.
I guess that's the reason why a new model contains no longer an intel chip.
Edit: The quad-core A53 is the same processor as the Raspberry Pi3 contains b.t.w. (if you want to compare)
Joying..with kld mcu???
And what is that windows buttom on home screen?
if I did help you, please hit "thanks" button
Make this in an 8 inch and consider it sold.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
ikerg said:
Joying..with kld mcu???
And what is that windows buttom on home screen?
if I did help you, please hit "thanks" button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The windows symbol is just another luncher.
Not sure how I feel about that screen mount. Looks like an afterthought...
Edited
I dont think its Joying though but it is nice.
Mammûûth said:
I dont think its Joying though but it is nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's got the iconic Joying display
bogdi1988 said:
It's got the iconic Joying display
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Joying from.intel units changed to other mcu rather than mtcd.
But, in case of going back to mtcd ... they always have their own customization of mcu, so it is expected a MTCD_JY_xxxxx
if I did help you, please hit "thanks" button
ikerg said:
if I did help you, please hit "thanks" button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol!
Intel stopped the Sofia line of development in April 2016. Intel stopped the collaboration with Rockchip completely.
I guess that's the reason why a new model contains no longer an intel chip.
Edit: The quad-core A53 is the same processor as the Raspberry Pi3 contains b.t.w. (if you want to compare)
The one About screen he showed in the video said it was an A-Media Auto unit. I have a different 7" unit with hardware buttons for my Prius that I am still trying to discover how to get into recovery.
Joying are pretty active on YouTube with new products on their own BoyKa channel, if this is a joying unit I'm surprised it didnt debut on that channel.
I asked Joying via facebook and they told me they dont know yet when they will release octa core version of their hu.
Peter Chan, i think, is with Pumpkin. If you look at his Videos page you see lots of Pumpkin postings
Mammûûth said:
I asked Joying via facebook and they told me they dont know yet when they will release octa core version of their hu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The new headunits March's with octa core and the DSP module will release march from joing. I asked them too personally and they told it.
CadillacMike said:
Peter Chan, i think, is with Pumpkin. If you look at his Videos page you see lots of Pumpkin postings
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it's joyings developers private channel. It's joying.
WILD9 said:
Joying are pretty active on YouTube with new products on their own BoyKa channel, if this is a joying unit I'm surprised it didnt debut on that channel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because it's the developers channel not official just private
loomism2 said:
The one About screen he showed in the video said it was an A-Media Auto unit. I have a different 7" unit with hardware buttons for my Prius that I am still trying to discover how to get into recovery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wrong thread pls edit your posting. Nobody cares your problem in this topic.

Android Head Unit Advice

Hi all,
I've been looking to upgrade the head unit in my car. I came across Android HUs on eBay.
This seems to be the best one on eBay to my (very limited) knowledge:
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Android-7...e=STRK:MEBIDX:IT&_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649
Are they any good? I have also seen them on Alibaba/Aliexpress. Are they all the same or are certain ones better? Prices can vary wildly.
If someone could point me in the right direction for the best quality HU I'd be very grateful!
That a px3 new modle with 2gig ram so yes it good but i would go for px5 chip if possible as it an 8 core both have great support on here malesky rom is excellent i personally wouldn't go for intel sofia as there slightly less support but that can change there some and root from what i read but no custom rom i could be wrong this is just my opinion
---------- Post added at 11:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:46 PM ----------
https://forum.xda-developers.com/an...rom-malaysk-roms-mtcd-device-t3598908/page211
---------- Post added 15th October 2017 at 12:00 AM ---------- Previous post was 14th October 2017 at 11:56 PM ----------
The download link is on first page of his page v5 is his latest https://yadi.sk/d/ouDv5oAo3Mh7M5 this his link to v5 it says download limit reached but all you do is just make an account then save to your yandisk acount then you can download
chris4507 said:
That a px3 new modle with 2gig ram so yes it good but i would go for px5 chip if possible as it an 8 core both have great support on here malesky rom is excellent i personally wouldn't go for intel sofia as there slightly less support but that can change there some and root from what i read but no custom rom i could be wrong this is just my opinion
---------- Post added at 11:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:46 PM ----------
https://forum.xda-developers.com/an...rom-malaysk-roms-mtcd-device-t3598908/page211
---------- Post added 15th October 2017 at 12:00 AM ---------- Previous post was 14th October 2017 at 11:56 PM ----------
The download link is on first page of his page v5 is his latest https://yadi.sk/d/ouDv5oAo3Mh7M5 this his link to v5 it says download limit reached but all you do is just make an account then save to your yandisk acount then you can download
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Less support? You should SEE what they're doing on the joying forum.... They've got the whole MCU protocol reverse engineered, and have the things running on the base AOSP (i.e., without all the chinese trash applications installed).
luciusfox said:
Less support? You should SEE what they're doing on the joying forum.... They've got the whole MCU protocol reverse engineered, and have the things running on the base AOSP (i.e., without all the chinese trash applications installed).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well that changes alot as i said i could be wrong lol you have to admit it is hard navigating throu these forums we could do with having them all cleaned up put into sections px5 px3 intel ..... Like the mobile section if you get me but anyway thanks for the info that may well be the next for me so do you think intel sofia ones better that px5 ?
So this is confusing me even more lol.
I've found the PX-5 unit which @chris4507 mentioned. Seems expensive but I'm willing to pay more for a piece of mind:
https://www.seicane.com/oem-2-din-2...nk-obd2-3g-wifi-backup-camera-canbus-s127000e
Can't find anything that mentions Joying? I'm not sure what that is...
mikem1989 said:
So this is confusing me even more lol.
I've found the PX-5 unit which @chris4507 mentioned. Seems expensive but I'm willing to pay more for a piece of mind:
https://www.seicane.com/oem-2-din-2...nk-obd2-3g-wifi-backup-camera-canbus-s127000e
Can't find anything that mentions Joying? I'm not sure what that is...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2GB RAM Octa Core Android 6.0 Car DVD GPS Navigation Multimedia Player Car Stereo for Fiat BRAVO 2007-2012 Radio Headunit
http://s.aliexpress.com/eiArENfu
(from AliExpress Android) theres this for fiat bravo anno there bit more expensive but px3 4 core px5 8 but up to you i dont know much about intel sofia and apparently there is support out there for them i.e custom roms so someone else who know will have to inform you which is better px5 or sofia but can garentee px5 better than px3
chris4507 said:
2GB RAM Octa Core Android 6.0 Car DVD GPS Navigation Multimedia Player Car Stereo for Fiat BRAVO 2007-2012 Radio Headunit
http://s.aliexpress.com/eiArENfu
(from AliExpress Android) theres this for fiat bravo anno there bit more expensive but px3 4 core px5 8 but up to you i dont know much about intel sofia and apparently there is support out there for them i.e custom roms so someone else who know will have to inform you which is better px5 or sofia but can garentee px5 better than px3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I may go for the PX5. It seems to be well supported. The Chinese Android head units do seem a bit of a gamble but have great potential.
I do agree with you that this forum should have more subsections, which would make it easier to navigate/ find the information I'm looking for.
mikem1989 said:
So this is confusing me even more lol.
I've found the PX-5 unit which @chris4507 mentioned. Seems expensive but I'm willing to pay more for a piece of mind:
https://www.seicane.com/oem-2-din-2...nk-obd2-3g-wifi-backup-camera-canbus-s127000e
Can't find anything that mentions Joying? I'm not sure what that is...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just to be a prick... http://bfy.tw/EU5z
luciusfox said:
Just to be a prick... http://bfy.tw/EU5z
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cheers mate...
I thought googling joying would yield similar pointless results as when I google PX5 (try it and see what comes up).
Been new to this, I actually thought 'joying' was a CPU name like PX5 is. I was keeping an eye out for joying in the specs.
luciusfox said:
Just to be a prick... http://bfy.tw/EU5z
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How did you do that btw?
We all enjoy being a prick. I want to do one for when people ask stupid questions on FB, like "What time does the Asda down the road close?"
mikem1989 said:
How did you do that btw?
We all enjoy being a prick. I want to do one for when people ask stupid questions on FB, like "What time does the Asda down the road close?"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Literally search Google for let me Google that for you.
Or visit here.
Which is lmgtfy =
Let
Me
Google
That
For
You
luciusfox said:
Less support? You should SEE what they're doing on the joying forum.... They've got the whole MCU protocol reverse engineered, and have the things running on the base AOSP (i.e., without all the chinese trash applications installed).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...disabled on xda, he sure does claim alot. Context is the JY sofia unit, which may or may not use the same protocol as MTCx.
For OP, read before you buy and understand what you are buying; do you need to rush.
These px3/px5 and sofia (except sofia jy) are all common reference units with many resellers and only a few manufacturers. They call work from a common reference design (MTCD being the latest) with a few minor variations - such as amp IC.
Beat you to it @typos1
marchnz said:
...disabled on xda, he sure does claim alot. Context is the JY sofia unit, which may or may not use the same protocol as MTCx.
For OP, read before you buy and understand what you are buying; do you need to rush.
These px3/px5 and sofia (except sofia jy) are all common reference units with many resellers and only a few manufacturers. They call work from a common reference design (MTCD being the latest) with a few minor variations - such as amp IC.
Beat you to it @typos1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You say that as if you don't believe a word of it, which is a pretty curious position for anyone to take when there is actual SOURCE CODE being provided. So you don't believe it? Maybe you should actually try it out. Check out the source code, build it, install it.
There are actually two main competing "sources". One is, as you mention, MTC, the other is FYT. Joying was initially reselling MTC units being built by Joyous (confusing?), buy they switched to SYU, which was manufacturing units based on the FYT SoM (specifically, FYT5009, and later they switched to FYT6021 which is basically the same, but has a different physical interface). Shortly after, FYT acquired SYU.
One of the big advantages to the FYT/SYU design is that there is a whole lot LESS dependency on the MCU. For example, you can search through the MTC forums and will find reference to a hardware modification to disconnect the i2c lines controlling the BD37xxx sound processor from the MCU and attach it to the SoC. This modification is entirely redundant on the FYT/SYU units, because the BD37xxx is built into the SoM rather than being added on later to the mainboard through the MCU. So right off the bat, it is a heck of a lot easier to manage the FYT units than the MTC units.
The MCU on the FYT designs is responsible for these functions;
1) AMFM radio,
2) GPIO, which basically means the binary car i/o signals; ACC, headlights, reverse, e-brake, amp power (out), antenna power (out). And on top of that, it has two analog inputs for 2-channel steering wheel interfaces.
And guess what? Everything else is directly controllable.
So you're absolutely right that the work being done for the joying units (FYT) is not in any way applicable to the MTC units. You can take that to mean that nobody with an MTC will be able to benefit from it, which means that they remain restricted by the broken software being distributed by the chinese manufacturers, whereas somebody who buys a Joying unit will have the freedom to CHOOSE if they want to use the broken chinese firmware, or try out the much LESS broken open source firmware, and contribute to that firmware if they like.
There are also plans to bring Android 8 to the Joying units.
Now one other consideration for the joying/fyt units; since the job of the MCU is so radically simplified compared to the MTC units, there is also a reasonable prospect of somebody one day deciding to build an open source MCU firmware for them. Its not like these MCU's are super secret chips that nobody can program anything for. The biggest part of that job will just be in writing the driver for working the AMFM radio, and AMFM radios really aren't all that complex. In the past, there have been hacker modifications for the MTC MCU firmware, but very restricted in scope due to the heap of bad code. Basically, the reverse engineering effort was insurmountable. With the MCU for the FYT, the only reverse engineering that is actually needed is restricted to simply tracing the circuit, then it can simply be written from scratch. Remember, its just AMFM radio and GPIO's.
luciusfox said:
You say that as if you don't believe a word of it, which is a pretty curious position for anyone to take when there is actual SOURCE CODE being provided. So you don't believe it? Maybe you should actually try it out. Check out the source code, build it, install it.
There are actually two main competing "sources". One is, as you mention, MTC, the other is FYT. Joying was initially reselling MTC units being built by Joyous (confusing?), buy they switched to SYU, which was manufacturing units based on the FYT SoM (specifically, FYT5009, and later they switched to FYT6021 which is basically the same, but has a different physical interface). Shortly after, FYT acquired SYU.
One of the big advantages to the FYT/SYU design is that there is a whole lot LESS dependency on the MCU. For example, you can search through the MTC forums and will find reference to a hardware modification to disconnect the i2c lines controlling the BD37xxx sound processor from the MCU and attach it to the SoC. This modification is entirely redundant on the FYT/SYU units, because the BD37xxx is built into the SoM rather than being added on later to the mainboard through the MCU. So right off the bat, it is a heck of a lot easier to manage the FYT units than the MTC units.
The MCU on the FYT designs is responsible for these functions;
1) AMFM radio,
2) GPIO, which basically means the binary car i/o signals; ACC, headlights, reverse, e-brake, amp power (out), antenna power (out). And on top of that, it has two analog inputs for 2-channel steering wheel interfaces.
And guess what? Everything else is directly controllable.
So you're absolutely right that the work being done for the joying units (FYT) is not in any way applicable to the MTC units. You can take that to mean that nobody with an MTC will be able to benefit from it, which means that they remain restricted by the broken software being distributed by the chinese manufacturers, whereas somebody who buys a Joying unit will have the freedom to CHOOSE if they want to use the broken chinese firmware, or try out the much LESS broken open source firmware, and contribute to that firmware if they like.
There are also plans to bring Android 8 to the Joying units.
Now one other consideration for the joying/fyt units; since the job of the MCU is so radically simplified compared to the MTC units, there is also a reasonable prospect of somebody one day deciding to build an open source MCU firmware for them. Its not like these MCU's are super secret chips that nobody can program anything for. The biggest part of that job will just be in writing the driver for working the AMFM radio, and AMFM radios really aren't all that complex. In the past, there have been hacker modifications for the MTC MCU firmware, but very restricted in scope due to the heap of bad code. Basically, the reverse engineering effort was insurmountable. With the MCU for the FYT, the only reverse engineering that is actually needed is restricted to simply tracing the circuit, then it can simply be written from scratch. Remember, its just AMFM radio and GPIO's.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Makes sense, thanks for the thoughtful and detailed response.
Was sceptical that anything might come of it.
Basically, what I am getting from this is that I should buy a Joying unit?...
It's a shame, as I do not like the physical appearance of them. The PX5 unit visibly suits my car much better.
mikem1989 said:
Basically, what I am getting from this is that I should buy a Joying unit?...
It's a shame, as I do not like the physical appearance of them. The PX5 unit visibly suits my car much better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its certainly what I would do.
As far as appearance goes, they have an "all black glass rectangle". Pretty hard to beat that visually.
N
mikem1989 said:
Basically, what I am getting from this is that I should buy a Joying unit?...
It's a shame, as I do not like the physical appearance of them. The PX5 unit visibly suits my car much better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Feel free to correct me if Im wrong - the pros n cons of each platform:
JY (sofia FTY)
Pros:
- Android Bluetooth, better a2dp quality.
- 3G built in option
- True 3 band eq(?)
- Android control of audio (?)
- potentially AOSP on these units within an undefined timeline
Cons:
- same as MTCD in terms of software bugs/overall quality
- RDS AF issue/non-function
- small number of manufacturers
- suspect JY to drop sofia soon and move to PX5
SOM (this might be based on same reference as sofia w/built in BT?)
- Still uses MCU, albeit less functions are performed by MCU
-hardware QA
- rubbish warranty as all other chinese reseller
- rubbish reseller support as all other chinese reseller
MTCD
Pros:
- Wide support and spares.
- high update cycle, availability of mcu and android due to multiple resellers, greater probability of a vendor releasing updates based on the reference release (e.g.currently HA releasing both HA and HCT reference updates)
- Ability to upgrade SOM or replace on failure
- same boot time/sleep as JY sofia
- same features as JY sofia
- greater model/case variations
- ostensibly more devs writing custom apps/control mods
Cons:
-Awful BT implementation (i suspect a port from wince units )
- above results in terrible a2dp quality and until recently bad quality/echo phone handsfree
- same RDS AF issue
- Hardware QA
- rubbish warranty as all other chinese reseller
- rubbish reseller support as all other chinese reseller
Anything else or do I have anything wrong here?
I'm still not decided between PX3 or PX5.
Does anyone know when they are due an update? (better CPU/More RAM)
Is it a yearly thing?
If so, may just wait for the next iteration.
mikem1989 said:
I'm still not decided between PX3 or PX5.
Does anyone know when they are due an update? (better CPU/More RAM)
Is it a yearly thing?
If so, may just wait for the next iteration.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've read that to move GPS Navigation and music at the same time comfortably, you should have at least 2 GB and PX5, but the Intel Sofia seems to be the best one of all.
Sent from my LG-D955 using Tapatalk
ptolomeo said:
I've read that to move GPS Navigation and music at the same time comfortably, you should have at least 2 GB and PX5, but the Intel Sofia seems to be the best one of all.
Sent from my LG-D955 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Intel Sofia only seems to be available in the joying units from what I see. With the fascia I want for my car it looks like I can choose between PX3 or PX5 only.
Think I'll go PX5. Unless there are any updated models on the horizon.

Joying Universal Single DIN Unit FYT Based?

Hi,
Im looking at one of these units from Joying for my older Jeep. Curious if these are FYT based or not?
Joying 6.2 Inch Single Din Android Head Unit with Cheapest Price Mirror Function
SKU: EU-Y-UOS04N1-BShip From: EU Warehouse (Only can ship to EU countries, cannot ship to other countries)CPU: SC7731E 1.3G Quad CoreRam:LPDDR4 1GB Rom:EMMC 16GBSupport Bluetooth,WiFi,DVR,OBD2,Back Up Camera
www.joyingauto.com
Does anyone have one of these adjustable screen units? Im looking to buying, the only thing I'm going to use it for is carplay thru a zbox zlink adaptor to play music and take calls. Will the 1GB model work ok for this? I think the specs are quite low, but the zbox Zlink or Carlinkit apps dont require much resources.
I ask if they are FYT because I have a Px3 2gb coreboard lying around, and if this unit is FYT based and I can just plug it in, getting the cheaper 1gb version vs the 4gb 8 octo core at twice the price seems like it would make more sense.
Anyone know?
sev said:
Hi,
Im looking at one of these units from Joying for my older Jeep. Curious if these are FYT based or not?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All Joyings are FYT based.
I can't answer your other questions as I use the unit (4GB/64GB) as it is intended.
interesting. i emailed them to ask if the 1 gig+16gig one is fyt based and they said no.
sev said:
interesting. i emailed them to ask if the 1 gig+16gig one is fyt based and they said no.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I guess they know better than I do, but if you look at all the apps: Those are the FYT apps.
Microntec, Topways, Antoto and other manufacturer apps do look different.
I would ask them which firmare you need for this unit, and then I'm very curious which firmware they point you to.

Latest/best Chinese Android headunit

As per the title - what is the best Chinese Android headunit you can buy? I'm particularly interested in boot time & ease of using Carplay. Sound quality isn't much of a priority.
bungers said:
As per the title - what is the best Chinese Android headunit you can buy? I'm particularly interested in boot time & ease of using Carplay. Sound quality isn't much of a priority.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi you can buy units with DSP equalizer and qualcomm processor inside not mediatek Chinese ****. You won't regret it. For now best are expensive ones with octa core.
Just buy a genuine carplay unit. You're doing it backward looking for an android headunit but wanting carplay.
Anton TNT said:
Hi you can buy units with DSP equalizer and qualcomm processor inside not mediatek Chinese ****. You won't regret it. For now best are expensive ones with octa core.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you suggest a model?
marchnz said:
Just buy a genuine carplay unit. You're doing it backward looking for an android headunit but wanting carplay.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean a mainstream brand? There isn’t one that fits how I want, whereas things like these 10.1” ones
https://a.aliexpress.com/_mr8bBs6
are a perfect fit, I just want one which has a fast boot/ability to sleep, a decent screen and CarPlay. The ability to run other apps like torque is also a benefit of the Android units.
Search for 7862s units. That's the latest chipset for android head units. They all have very similar specs so no need to look for a special brand or device.
blue_one said:
Search for 7862s units. That's the latest chipset for android head units. They all have very similar specs so no need to look for a special brand or device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That’s great, thank you
Specifically FYT UIS7862 units. See FYT forums.
Always Require seller to send screen shots of Android system information. Avoid being scammed.
marchnz said:
Specifically FYT UIS7862 units. See FYT forums.
Always Require seller to send screen shots of Android system information. Avoid being scammed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks

Categories

Resources