Give Credit, Where Credit's Due - LG G5 Guides, News, & Discussion

OK, so i found my tutorial here not ONLY was it written wrong, but is out of date and NO credits given to the person who took time out of their day to get the information out to others. I know this isn't the first time this has happened to others, or me, but it is still flipping irritating. i mean, i don't mind that someone used mine and other's info, but at least give them the credit where they deserve. is that too much to ask.
i know this sounds like a rant, but I kinda wanted to point it out.

Yes, you did lay it out for LS992 users first. But I don't think the site stole or did anything that wasn't an already known method. your method wasn't new.. you just confirmed that the H850 dll works for LS992 and that previously known manual registry edits work with the G5 too. We've been doing this since the G3 days... manually editing the registry to add unsupported models to LGUP.
The website in question is run by asialove (afaik) who maintains the G5 KDZ update thread and also built all the DLL msi installers for G5.. and all he's done is lay out the the standard LGUP flash instructions that are used on every other G5 model already... install dll msi.. install LGUP msi.. flash TOT/KDZ. But perhaps he should be using LGUP 1.11 not 1.14.. but I don't have an LS992 to confirm if his LS992 DLL msi allows it to work on 1.14.. maybe 1.14 works with it now which would then be much different than your original thread.. can anyone confirm?
And giving credit alone doesn't mean it's a-ok to use others files/work either. For example.. I could make it an issue that you took the LGUP 1.11 that Codefire shared and added it into your own LGUP zips.. taking away from our download stats and ad revenue... but.. I'm not (and I'm not asking you to change it.. it's really fine by me). I only mention it so you can perhaps now relate... wear the other persons shoes.. see the other side of the story.. whatever you wanna call it.
At the end of day.. everything gets taken without credit in some shape or form once it goes public... and you have to decide if you want the info out there or keep to yourself. I have to battle with this decision on a regular basis... do I help the community, enable people to make money off my free work and allow LG to see what were doing... or just sit on it and say nothing.
This was not meant as any sort of attack against you or discrediting your contributions.. just trying to put things in perspective.
Yes, getting credit is nice. And yes, people should try to credit when sharing others work whenever possible. Be proud when you get the credit you deserve.. but don't let the non-credit get to you or it may eventually cause you to never wanna share again.

Related

Donate to Haykuro!!!

Hey, it just occurred to me that if everyone who CAN donates $20.00 to Haykuro, he will have himself a nice little fund starting up. If you can donate more, do so. This kid deserves our REAL thanks for all of this work. Lets pony up guys.
17 years old and kicking open source ass... he deserves to be rewarded.
EDIT: Find the link to donate on his iphoneproject.com page.
I'll surely give some $$$ if he can quickly fix market issue
by the way, your URL is invalid for paypal.
I donated a while back!
I donated a while back as well. What bugs me is that we have so many other people working on this like Daproy and Korndub and they get no $$$ or recognition for the most part. I say that Haykuro needs to set up a fund and split moneys received between people who contributed to this. None less, he is a genious.
I've had the same concerns as you.
I think Darkrift worked on this as well. Probably when the builds are pretty much complete, someone should put a list of everyone who contributed so we can send them all something as well.
I had some ppl offer donations but I have not worked on this nearly as much as you guys think. What I have done was my way of donating to him since I am poor and cannot do so with paypal. I tried to beta test when I could, write up tuts, answer questions and much the same as everyone else in the thread did. I do not know the extent of the others who are helping so I cannot say the same for them, but I personally have not been working hard enough on this to deserve donations (unless you wanna send me a free G1, I will take that )
If you feel the need to donate to me, send it here https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=4290101
Everyone has been very generous and caring, and I thank you all for that.
This post will give credit where it's due, and let everyone know what's up (clear some confusion).
History of the builds:
1. xmoo and his anonymous source post up a leak of the system folder from a developer magic (or something similar).
2. Everyone on XDA was going crazy, of course, and I tried to explain how to get it to boot properly, and no one listened, so I took it into my own hands to release a functional version.
3. After some talking with barakinflorida, he gave me the idea of implementing aHome into the build that way we had a home screen (at the time, no home screen was available as aCore crashed when you tried opening it).
4. After a week of running it, i noticed a OTA update being pushed (noticed it in logcat) i pulled it and released build 4.
5. I noticed the SPL and posted that, with the proper changes in update-script for the dream. Same thing with the radio.
6. korndub noted that my update-script for the radio was messed up and simply stripped down the update-script (not sure if you guys remember the recovery errors on my radio update, as opposed to korndubs stripped radio update).
5. A week later I got some info from darkrift which led to build 4.5.
6. After some personal tinkering i got google apps from 4.5 ported to build 4, and called it 4.9.
7. 5.0 was then released after daproy noted the camera and audio fix in the master branches of the kernel. he also kindly donated a pre-compiled kernel, saving everyone time from waiting for me to find a linux comp i could compile on.
8. Since then me and daproy have worked together to bring you the next builds. daproy provides me with the kernels, and i do everything else.
I think in the end, the people who would deserve donations would be up to you.
But this is the history of how it all came to be
I would prefer it were told like this (much more heroic):
5.5 Darkrift daringly put the life of his precious G1 on the line to test out various beta builds that haykuro made in a half asleep state. Fending away fire and deadly battery pulls, he made sure everyone who flashes one of those roms would still have a working G1.
Darkrift said:
I would prefer it were told like this (much more heroic):
5.5 Darkrift daringly put the life of his precious G1 on the line to test out various beta builds that haykuro made in a half asleep state. Fending away fire and deadly battery pulls, he made sure everyone who flashes one of those roms would still have a working G1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol oh yea, that too.. well, as you said. i was half asleep through most of that
Excuse me for being a NoOb, but here goes....
.... Is it possible to send my girlfriend through paypal? If so where can I find a "how-to"? It is very well deserved.
If she is hot, just send pics :S
Just donated $20 to the man ............. hope others follow and donate.
Keep up the good work man!
I donated a decent amount to hay and never even got a thank you. I will not donate again to him. The least he could have done was sent a thank you...
I'm gonna go ahead and give a big thanks to Haykuro/Darkrift since trying to install a2sd for the first time by following Darkrift's instructions led me to write my original tutorial(how passe that tutorial of mine seems now..), and subsequently my appstosd app, which led to the unionfs method and appstosd2. Of course other people helped along the way(TheDudeofLife, MartinFick, JF) but it was really Haykuro and Darkrift that got me going.
In short: you can partially thank both of them for having unionfs(somewhat ironic considering it was Haykuro's ROMs that never implemented it (j/k man, I think I had enough trouble trying to debug my script with TheDude's ROM))
EDIT: Upon rereading I realized that this could be taken as somewhat backhanded. I didn't mean that Darkrifts instructions were so bad I had to write my own. He intentionally(I now fully understand why) left out some parts of the process and I thought I'd take up the torch and try to have the whole thing in a way I saw as a little bit safer(or at least less scary).
[email protected] said:
I'm gonna go ahead and give a big thanks to Haykuro/Darkrift since trying to install a2sd for the first time by following Darkrift's instructions led me to write my original tutorial(how passe that tutorial of mine seems now..), and subsequently my appstosd app, which led to the unionfs method and appstosd2. Of course other people helped along the way(TheDudeofLife, MartinFick, JF) but it was really Haykuro and Darkrift that got me going.
In short: you can partially thank both of them for having unionfs(somewhat ironic considering it was Haykuro's ROMs that never implemented it (j/k man, I think I had enough trouble trying to debug my script with TheDude's ROM))
EDIT: Upon rereading I realized that this could be taken as somewhat backhanded. I didn't mean that Darkrifts instructions were so bad I had to write my own. He intentionally(I now fully understand why) left out some parts of the process and I thought I'd take up the torch and try to have the whole thing in a way I saw as a little bit safer(or at least less scary).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I only started this thread because I know that this kid is 17 and still working on getting his HS diploma, also holding down a job AND working on these roms. Even after he was burned by someone on the forums, he came back when it was ready and gave us Hero (with a NEW Rosie smell)... He continues to put out roms for us and now the canucks with the Rogers rom. I also just saw that there's a Hero rom he just put out for those running Magic/Sapphire devices. The kid continues to work hard on this stuff and I think he deserves to be rewarded. No matter who was helping him get stuff to make the builds lets remember WHO brought the first cupcake to the masses... Now he's brought us a GOOD (not great yet, but it'll get there) version of a rom that we aren't even supposed to have ACCESS to!!! I, for one, think that this guy should get together with JF and Dude and whoever else and start a consortium and start getting paid to develop for Android. This is the OS of the future (for now) and there is some serious need for dedicated programmers who can make it all work... I think he is more on top of it than anyone out there...
That's what made me post this... I have donated a couple of times to the kid, and I'm not done. It's not to pay him for his product, but to thank him for working his butt off on something that he doesn't have to and then giving it away to the masses (again, he doesn't have to)....
So again, Thanks Haykuro and I hope your situation changes soon... Keep up the coding man....
ChicoJD
chicojd said:
I only started this thread because I know that this kid is 17 and still working on getting his HS diploma, also holding down a job AND working on these roms. Even after he was burned by someone on the forums, he came back when it was ready and gave us Hero (with a NEW Rosie smell)... He continues to put out roms for us and now the canucks with the Rogers rom. I also just saw that there's a Hero rom he just put out for those running Magic/Sapphire devices. The kid continues to work hard on this stuff and I think he deserves to be rewarded. No matter who was helping him get stuff to make the builds lets remember WHO brought the first cupcake to the masses... Now he's brought us a GOOD (not great yet, but it'll get there) version of a rom that we aren't even supposed to have ACCESS to!!! I, for one, think that this guy should get together with JF and Dude and whoever else and start a consortium and start getting paid to develop for Android. This is the OS of the future (for now) and there is some serious need for dedicated programmers who can make it all work... I think he is more on top of it than anyone out there...
That's what made me post this... I have donated a couple of times to the kid, and I'm not done. It's not to pay him for his product, but to thank him for working his butt off on something that he doesn't have to and then giving it away to the masses (again, he doesn't have to)....
So again, Thanks Haykuro and I hope your situation changes soon... Keep up the coding man....
ChicoJD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
? Was this responding to mine? I was honestly thanking Haykuro as well... (maybe I'm misunderstanding something?)
[email protected] said:
? Was this responding to mine? I was honestly thanking Haykuro as well... (maybe I'm misunderstanding something?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No necessarily... I was actually just trying to explain why I singled him out for donations. I don't know him personally, have never seen the kids face... All I know is that he's been dedicated to making the device better, and sharing it with all of us, all the while going to school and work, dealing with everything that comes with being 17! I noticed some posts that mentioned all who helped him, and that's fine. This is about helping a kid who really needs the help. Who knows, Steve may be the next Gates or Jobs!!!
lock close delete, this is going to end up being one of those fanboy threads that get ugly.
koxx said:
I'll surely give some $$$ if he can quickly fix market issue
by the way, your URL is invalid for paypal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's a permission issue most likely, run the "auto lucid" .bat program on these forums and it can restore the permision to apps2sd folders
dbhatesyou said:
lock close delete, this is going to end up being one of those fanboy threads that get ugly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only if someone tries to make it ugly! And for the record, I'm no-one's fanboy. Let's look at it this way... In a community, those who have the means help those who need and deserve the help. Haykuro is in the latter group and a lot of us are in the former group. Would you have a thread closed based on the fact that you don't agree with the material? Does that sound like the way things are done on this board? If it is, I'm out!
EDIT: Mods, if you feel there's a better category than Dev for this thread, please feel free to move it...

[UPDATE:16.10.12]ATRI Atrix ThatRom Installer v2

hello, i've made an Automated Atrix ThatRom Installer.
This script will help noobs to do everything without any troubles.
The file is a rar archive with all firmware files + installer.
here is a link http://www.mobile-inform.com/content/view/1148/1/
this is early alpha. you take all responsibility on yourself. I do not recommend you to use this rom, but if you still want to use it - here it is
UPD Updated To ThatRom v2 (AtrICS)
all thanks to the author of ThatRomv2 (AtrICS), i made only the Installer!
With best regards
the_fly
I don't think that it's a good idea to make an automatic installer of something that it's no stable for someone who doesn't even know how to use fastboot nor flash a zip. Maybe when this finally reaches the stable "level", then you should do the Installer.
BravoMotorola said:
Maybe, until you're not annoying, you should stfu. Seriously stop trying to tell people what to do.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow dude, that was really uncalled for. He is actually right because now the op has put himself in a position to be harassed by anyone who tries this and messes up their phone even though they should and do know the risks. He was just trying to be helpful, he wasn't attacking the op for making it.
I agree making an unstable, untested, developer test build easily available to newbies is a very bad idea. If they can't at the VERY least learn how to use fastboot and adb, they should come nowhere near this ROM. Unless of course you really want to be held responsible for dozens of bricked and/or unusable phones, and be expected to provide extensive support at all times.
if they are noobs - it is their problem. Everything is written befoure me.
Everyone takes responsibility for their actions.
There were several noobs who were crying about ICS even if they do not know what to do. and they are happy now, despite the bugs.
I am not, but i made for those who are. I am not going to tell anyone to install it, i did only help, but i suggest nobody to install it.
It doesn't work and you know it. It's as if there was some paid software that people want, and you made a crack/patch for it, and then you say you don't advise using it. Do you really think people will stay away just because you advised so? No, they won't. In fact in that case your disclaimers make no difference whatsoever, you are equally at fault for making it available as they are for using it. Why do you think all anti-piracy companies always go after crack makers and distributors and not so much after users? I mean many crack makers also advise against using their cracks. But people are stupid and never listen, and in in the eyes of many crack makers are the original offenders.
Or if you want a different analogy - go find a mentally unstable person who can't really think straight (may seem offensive but noobs who want test builds on their phones clearly do not know what they're doing), then place a bottle of some drugs and a fresh needle within easy reach, and then tell them you advise not using it. Observe what happens.
IMO this kind of things are best dealt with preemptively, by not even making the potentially controversial stuff easily available.
you see, i've made first script of unlocking the boot a year ago. a lot of peole thanked me. they were happy - they unlocked once and than used other ways to change the firmware. They were noobs, but happy noobs. 18 000 downloads (i think some of them were same persons, for example me - while i was testing, or when i was unlocking for my friends), but only 4!!! broken phones. 2 of them caused by bad motherboard and 2 of them by ignoring the manual and all the warnings.
This one is more easy one. less questins. less work. just use it.
and if person already have unlocked boot there will be no problem with this FW
and i want to mention it again some users are happy enought with this fw. Some do not have reboots, some have but for them it is ok.
You should tell everyone that this is a very alpha rom. It does run without multiple reboots for most people per the forums. I personally have tried all methods and cannot get it to run.
I appreciate your efforts but this is not something that noobs will get any value from. You should be very clear upfront.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
agurzhiy said:
hello, i've made an Automated Atrix ThatRom Installer.
This script will help noobs to do everything without any troubles.
The file is a rar archive with all firmware files + installer.
With best regards
the_fly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks agurzhiy!
I am a proud noob who used your unlock script and will use this one.
For all the pros which have a problem with this- you have the same approach as Motorola - "It's complicated you can't understand this". It's my choice what to do with my phone and agurzhiy providing us noobs with a possibility to participate in the effort to make it better.
The bottom line is instead of criticize why don't you spend this time and energy on creating and helping the community. Remember you were ones noobs too.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
e07015 said:
You should tell everyone that this is a very alpha rom. It does run without multiple reboots for most people per the forums. I personally have tried all methods and cannot get it to run.
I appreciate your efforts but this is not something that noobs will get any value from. You should be very clear upfront.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think everyone knows that it is alpha rom. nobody is going to install a script if if nobody knows what's inside. But i will add that it is alpha
ComX said:
For all the pros which have a problem with this- you have the same approach as Motorola - "It's complicated you can't understand this".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're missing my point entirely here. But that's okay. I don't want to argue anymore.
Is this just a fastboot script or an bootloader unlocker and ram fix etc etc
ravilov said:
You're missing my point entirely here. But that's okay. I don't want to argue anymore.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not think that this is an argument. It is more like sharing different views on a subject.
I know what you mean, you want to prevent (or at least warn) noobs from taking the risk of bricking their phone and you are right 100%. But let me ask you how many of XDA readers are dumb enough to download some thing like this without reading at least a bit about it(*). Give ppl a little credit, most of us will stop on red light although it is possible to continue. Take me for example: I wanted to use nebtop but had a difficulty to understand how to root. Than mramirezusa came out with Automatic bootloader for noobs like me and boom - now I'm using the atrix as a streamer and without this tool I couldn't do this on my own. My point is that having a possibility to do stuff is highly appreciated.
* Ryan Dunn: If You Gonna be Dumb - You Gotta Be Tough.
this is a fastboot script to make it faster and easyer for a noob
UPDATE:
added the 32 bit version for x86 Windows
agurzhiy said:
UPDATE:
added the 32 bit version for x86 Windows
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude, you've only been thanked here 7 times... Stop thinking so highly of yourself.
Unless you are going to stick around the forums helping these guys out when they have issues with your release, because they won't have anywhere else to go, and because other devs are busy with their own stuff, than you should probably refrain from posting anything that makes it easier to flash dangerous software.
Unless you're willing to help "guy xyz" (since quotes seem to be in) on "page 74" when he asks again, "why am i having video issues after flash", because your main post lacks important details and explanation and your web link is not multi-lingual, please refrain from posting content which could be perceived as harmful to use.
Any good software community recommends first releasing to a smaller test group in order to work out major bugs and minimize any potential impact the software may have on the device... And, any good service community would recommend first releasing to a smaller test group in order to create a base to compare full deployment scenarios against... In no cases would they make it easy to install buggy software on devices of users who can not adequately report issues during alpha stages of software.
Why is it so hard to understand how that applies here?
Zeljko1234 said:
IMO, you should stop spending so much time here on the forum arguing with people. Don't get me wrong but your posts are usually quite offensive (example what I saw today). You post almost in every thread, smartassing noobs, playing to be moderator... If you know something, share it, if post or thread is against the rules, report it.
Now you're arguing with guy who made first script of unlocking the bootloader and in the same time insinuate that many of xda members are just dump.
Forum, especially xda, is about sharing knowledge not giving useless advise/comment or to google it.
P.S.
Sorry everyone for off topic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We try not to feed him, Zeljko1234... Just let him be.
Your point is well deserved; but don't feed the trolls.
knigitz said:
Dude, you've only been thanked here 7 times... Stop thinking so highly of yourself.
Unless you are going to stick around the forums helping these guys out when they have issues with your release, because they won't have anywhere else to go, and because other devs are busy with their own stuff, than you should probably refrain from posting anything that makes it easier to flash dangerous software.
Unless you're willing to help "guy xyz" (since quotes seem to be in) on "page 74" when he asks again, "why am i having video issues after flash", because your main post lacks important details and explanation and your web link is not multi-lingual, please refrain from posting content which could be perceived as harmful to use.
Any good software community recommends first releasing to a smaller test group in order to work out major bugs and minimize any potential impact the software may have on the device... And, any good service community would recommend first releasing to a smaller test group in order to create a base to compare full deployment scenarios against... In no cases would they make it easy to install buggy software on devices of users who can not adequately report issues during alpha stages of software.
Why is it so hard to understand how that applies here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why don't you argue with epinter or any other person who put ThatRom?
Why are you arguing with me?
i made the thing easier, but i am not responsible for the uncomplete software. some people are lazy to use fastboot, but they know how to use it (i have flashed my phone 3 times while testing some of options to find out how it works)
other do not have enough knowledge to flash, but it's thair dream to have it, they are ready for the bugs and they alwas can ask me to help them to flash any other FW. And if they have unlocked boot - they can use CWM.
And the last group - the people who are just afraid to install after a lot of information about locking bootloaders. In russian community forums i've read 10 such questions from people who i know, from people who know how to use fastboot.
And if person do not want to install it - he may not install it!
I'm thankful to everyone who share knowledge. Even if I don't use everything, I usually download or read just to learn how. Without such guys, Internet itself will be mostly useless.
Do not blame anyone (especially epinter) for your mistake. He and many others guys spend a lot of their private time to figure how to do something, developing, supporting... and then sahre for free! As I can see, very rare they get donation. Almost never for the most loudest complainers which just wait that someone else will do something for them.
As I explained, as long as you are willing to stick around and help people with issues they encounter after flashing this, and provide more detailed instructions that people can read in your first post, it's not an issue.
Low thank count makes the more seasoned members cringe, as people release stuff that brick phones then disappear (it happens), leaving the community in a state of unrest trying to figure out the full impact of an unmaintained release, how many users were affected by the release, and a common way to fix the issues, and it leaves it up to other developers to explain to every xyz person to read this thread, read that thread, or flash this to fix.
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk 2

AOKP - 6.0 for Moto G3!!

This rom is now available. I found it during a system-wide search on android file host. Its a new release. I have not tested it, but after testing the Xperia Z5 rom in an earlier post, I'd like to see someone else give this one a shot.
There's rom's out there guys, that we haven't seen on the boards. Lets find them, test them, and get them posted!! The moto community will be grateful! I'm assuming this xperia z5 rom is going to be a huge hit on here.
Once again, I'm new here, thus I can't post links yet. But go to android file host, search osprey and you'll find both the Xperia Z5 and the AOKP.
Those familiar with AOKP/AOSP will probably love this new rom!
Dude.. we're not going to flash a zip without any information.
I could just upload a zip with a script to hard brick your phone and name it Osprey Rom, Would you flash it?
HelpMeruth said:
Dude.. we're not going to flash a zip without any information.
I could just upload a zip with a script to hard brick your phone and name it Osprey Rom, Would you flash it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. I did.
Yes it works.
No, its not for me. Its too vanilla. Basically an AOSP with a few tricks. Its about a 315mb rom when packed. This is a good rom for someone looking to make a "custom" rom themselves using xposed, gravitybox, etc. Nothing more, nothing less.
So I answered your question, and honestly. Your turn:
If I made a nice thread, with a visually pleasing post, some github links, thanked squid for his kernel that I used, gave a few step by step instructions on how to install it, and a fancy little change log......... maybe a gif of a dancing baby. Would that'd be enough for you to click on it? Keep in mind, its the same file I just posted above.... but you're going to download it now that its 'described' and has 'screenshots'. LOL You're about a rom away from a total brick dude. I guess what I'm saying is, what do you look for when you install a new rom? If you're not testing it before you install it, reviewing its code, etc... then you're just going on the words of someone else. BE smart. Try before you buy.
Thank god that Alberto, vastal, boswejla, and flasssssshhhh are good guys and gals. You'd obviously click on anything that had a trusted OP backing it. Be smarter than that. And don't come in here speaking for other people. Its disrespectful to insert your opinion into the minds of others, representing yourself as a spokesman for a "Brick Union"......
If you don't want to try out the rom found, don't. I didn't build it. I'm not getting paid for it. I don't even know who designed it or who ported it.
I just know, that I tested it on my linux VM..... then my Moto G3..... it boots, it works, and I haven't found any security issues with it.
Stick to your 'safe' custom rom. I'll stick to mine. Just trying to expose people to more roms. Nothing more, nothing less.
Thank you for your time and thoughts. Every response keeps this thread visible, and allows more people to experience the things I have.
bubbyj said:
Yes. I did.
Yes it works.
No, its not for me. Its too vanilla. Basically an AOSP with a few tricks. Its about a 315mb rom when packed. This is a good rom for someone looking to make a "custom" rom themselves using xposed, gravitybox, etc. Nothing more, nothing less.
So I answered your question, and honestly. Your turn:
If I made a nice thread, with a visually pleasing post, some github links, thanked squid for his kernel that I used, gave a few step by step instructions on how to install it, and a fancy little change log......... maybe a gif of a dancing baby. Would that'd be enough for you to click on it? Keep in mind, its the same file I just posted above.... but you're going to download it now that its 'described' and has 'screenshots'. LOL You're about a rom away from a total brick dude. I guess what I'm saying is, what do you look for when you install a new rom? If you're not testing it before you install it, reviewing its code, etc... then you're just going on the words of someone else. BE smart. Try before you buy.
Thank god that Alberto, vastal, boswejla, and flasssssshhhh are good guys and gals. You'd obviously click on anything that had a trusted OP backing it. Be smarter than that. And don't come in here speaking for other people. Its disrespectful to insert your opinion into the minds of others, representing yourself as a spokesman for a "Brick Union"......
If you don't want to try out the rom found, don't. I didn't build it. I'm not getting paid for it. I don't even know who designed it or who ported it.
I just know, that I tested it on my linux VM..... then my Moto G3..... it boots, it works, and I haven't found any security issues with it.
Stick to your 'safe' custom rom. I'll stick to mine. Just trying to expose people to more roms. Nothing more, nothing less.
Thank you for your time and thoughts. Every response keeps this thread visible, and allows more people to experience the things I have.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow dude you got me there, i'm sorry man
bubbyj said:
Yes. I did.
Yes it works.
No, its not for me. Its too vanilla. Basically an AOSP with a few tricks. Its about a 315mb rom when packed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You stated in your first post that you found it but had not tested it, so no, no one would want to test it from that. As for this post, I'm not sure what to make of that rambling, partly incoherent post.
Tel864,
At the moment I found it, I was testing the Xperia z5-g3 rom that I had found. A little later, I tested the AOKP that this thread is based upon. I apologize that I wrote my last post in a way that is difficult to understand for some people (you). But I'll try typing a little slower, for those who read a little slower.
So a brief recap for the reading impaired:
-Yes, I downloaded it.
-Yes, I tested it.
-No, I didn't really like it. Its a vanilla based rom, meant for customization by the end user using xposed and gravity box.
-It is a rather small build, about 315mb downloaded and about 900mb installed.
-I haven't found any rom breaking bugs, but again, I only tested it for about an hour before deciding it wasn't for me. But in all honesty, I knew it wasn't, as I had used AOKP and AOSP rom's in the past. I was merely testing it, so that those who are scared to do so -- would feel better about it.
Here's what I don't understand. Every week someone posts a new project, whether it be a kernel or rom. And every week, it is usually untested until they ask for volunteers. Sometimes the post will even go as far as saying that the it was developed without access to a moto g3, hence the developer themselves hadn't even tested it. Yet, with each new and untested project, person after person says "I'll test it!", "Sign me up!", "Ready when you are!!"
If testing a unknown rom isn't for you, then do us a favor... move on. Just curious though, what rom/kernel do you use? If you're running anything other than stock, then you took a chance when you installed it. The difference however, is that the OP made a 'pretty' and 'informative' initial post that caught your eye like a shiny object. If the same file that I mentioned in the original post, had specs, some graphics, and a few visually pleasing edits..... it wouldn't change anything about the file. It'd just change YOU, and YOUR mind.
So again, why do you trust ANYONE on here? Now... move on.
Interesting... I thought AOKP kind of folded a year or two ago, there haven't been any "official" builds since 2014. The Moto G is not listed as a supported device on their site, any generation of it, must be someones private port.
bubbyj said:
Tel864,
At the moment I found it, I was testing the Xperia z5-g3 rom that I had found. A little later, I tested the AOKP that this thread is based upon. I apologize that I wrote my last post in a way that is difficult to understand for some people (you). But I'll try typing a little slower, for those who read a little slower.
So a brief recap for the reading impaired:
-Yes, I downloaded it.
-Yes, I tested it.
-No, I didn't really like it. Its a vanilla based rom, meant for customization by the end user using xposed and gravity box.
-It is a rather small build, about 315mb downloaded and about 900mb installed.
-I haven't found any rom breaking bugs, but again, I only tested it for about an hour before deciding it wasn't for me. But in all honesty, I knew it wasn't, as I had used AOKP and AOSP rom's in the past. I was merely testing it, so that those who are scared to do so -- would feel better about it.
Here's what I don't understand. Every week someone posts a new project, whether it be a kernel or rom. And every week, it is usually untested until they ask for volunteers. Sometimes the post will even go as far as saying that the it was developed without access to a moto g3, hence the developer themselves hadn't even tested it. Yet, with each new and untested project, person after person says "I'll test it!", "Sign me up!", "Ready when you are!!"
If testing a unknown rom isn't for you, then do us a favor... move on. Just curious though, what rom/kernel do you use? If you're running anything other than stock, then you took a chance when you installed it. The difference however, is that the OP made a 'pretty' and 'informative' initial post that caught your eye like a shiny object. If the same file that I mentioned in the original post, had specs, some graphics, and a few visually pleasing edits..... it wouldn't change anything about the file. It'd just change YOU, and YOUR mind.
So again, why do you trust ANYONE on here? Now... move on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I trust people with a high *thanks* rating, So if Squid or lost101 asks me to test something I don't expect that they want to brick my device. And please this is still Xda the place for the nice people .
I already said sorry for posting that hateful post, We can be friends.
I see you are really into testing new and exciting things, we need those people who will almost flash and test anything to make the experience for the end user as good as possible. Have a nice day and again sorry for the hate.
bubbyj said:
Yes. I did.
Yes it works.
No, its not for me. Its too vanilla. Basically an AOSP with a few tricks. Its about a 315mb rom when packed. This is a good rom for someone looking to make a "custom" rom themselves using xposed, gravitybox, etc. Nothing more, nothing less.
So I answered your question, and honestly. Your turn:
If I made a nice thread, with a visually pleasing post, some github links, thanked squid for his kernel that I used, gave a few step by step instructions on how to install it, and a fancy little change log......... maybe a gif of a dancing baby. Would that'd be enough for you to click on it? Keep in mind, its the same file I just posted above.... but you're going to download it now that its 'described' and has 'screenshots'. LOL You're about a rom away from a total brick dude. I guess what I'm saying is, what do you look for when you install a new rom? If you're not testing it before you install it, reviewing its code, etc... then you're just going on the words of someone else. BE smart. Try before you buy.
Thank god that Alberto, vastal, boswejla, and flasssssshhhh are good guys and gals. You'd obviously click on anything that had a trusted OP backing it. Be smarter than that. And don't come in here speaking for other people. Its disrespectful to insert your opinion into the minds of others, representing yourself as a spokesman for a "Brick Union"......
If you don't want to try out the rom found, don't. I didn't build it. I'm not getting paid for it. I don't even know who designed it or who ported it.
I just know, that I tested it on my linux VM..... then my Moto G3..... it boots, it works, and I haven't found any security issues with it.
Stick to your 'safe' custom rom. I'll stick to mine. Just trying to expose people to more roms. Nothing more, nothing less.
Thank you for your time and thoughts. Every response keeps this thread visible, and allows more people to experience the things I have.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the tip
However its not booting on my xt1550 stuck @Moto logo
I flashed @squid2's kernel and it booted but my setup wizard kept fcing
So unable to use the ROM..
androidbaba said:
Thanks for the tip
However its not booting on my xt1550 stuck @Moto logo
I flashed @squid2's kernel and it booted but my setup wizard kept fcing
So unable to use the ROM..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just delete setup wizard via twrp

Why did you buy this phone?

It was a random guy selling it by the train station where I lived. I was skeptical at first as it could've been stolen but at the end of the day I had my head am filming so I just took video of the transaction. Got it $15 cheaper than what the store was offering it for with a discount with a month of activation. Sounded fair to me.
The screen is what sold me. So much space to it. A Google search later and I was sold on it from the processor, screen size, and internal space. For $35 it wasn't bad.
Tinkering with it these few months has been nice. I've never owned an LG device before this one, can't say I will after though. I'm a Samsung/ZTE kind of guy. Those companies love the developers.
LG released source code like 4-5 months after the phones release, which really sucked development wise. We were pretty much screwed from the getgo.
A year later and there's not much development done for it but we do have the people making the effort still and that is what development is about. The ability to keep trying g no matter how long it takes. Who knows? Maybe we will find something new, or maybe LG will give us a new platform update (mm or n).
In the meantime, I still carry 2 phones as this one is just to tinker on.
Why did you get this phone?
RahulMantha said:
bro i know ,,one thing the thread i posted there,,is due to my intention,,i want to force the developer's so that ,the developer might come and involve in this ,,so that we can make our device,,work most out of it,,as u know that we both will think same,,as we want a custom rom ,,for this device,other wise there is no war between u and me ,,we both are friend's , as we developer should't fight for this type of thing's so ,,we are friend ,,we are in xda developing community ,,so what ever,,i commented u ,i am taking them back,,the k7 device, is great,,even pixel can't beat it ,,i know ,,but i hope any one compile rom,,and that's why i open many thread's daily and seeing if some one ,,can post any thread related to custom rom,,as i am i hope u understand ,,,becuase i am typing it ,fastly,,so kind to bare me ,,and read this ,,i hope ,,atleast,,i helped some one from my heart,,in some thread's ,,so thank you for ur comment's i'll take it postively,,and ,,it was my regret,,and i love lg k7 ,,i was my best phone never ,,thank you i hope ,,u like me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This thread is not designated for this discussion you're bringing. This is a discussion on why users have obtained this device, reason why exactly people got it. What they expected from it.
As for your comments, I did not take them personally, I took them personally on behalf of the developers and users of the forum. As a community we must work together, not tear down whatever foundation is existent.
As for your participation, from my knowledge you helped with the as330 model as best as anyone could, but the ms330 model - you copied a couple posts which did more harm than good. Multiple threads of the same information to newcomers confuses them.
NASSTYROME said:
This thread is not designated for this discussion you're bringing. This is a discussion on why users have obtained this device, reason why exactly people got it. What they expected from it.
As for your comments, I did not take them personally, I took them personally on behalf of the developers and users of the forum. As a community we must work together, not tear down whatever foundation is existent.
As for your participation, from my knowledge you helped with the as330 model as best as anyone could, but the ms330 model - you copied a couple posts which did more harm than good. Multiple threads of the same information to newcomers confuses them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you ,,for your information,,now i will expire all my thread's ,in xda,,,i think then you will be happy with ,,anyway thank you ,you changed my mind ,about k7 ,and yes now i will close my all thread,,i hope u be happy with me ,and my work
and sorry for as330,
and thank you,i hope we both are friend's now ,thank you ,and if there are any mistake's in my typing
I got this phone because I had upgraded from the LG L90 with T-Mobile JUMP. The lady told us it was a better phone in the store. It's really not that much different tho. I still like this phone though.

moto g6 play xt1922-7(boost mobile) ota zip

i have pulled the ota zip for this model but im not sure what to do with it so here you go to whoever knows what to do.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YuH9d4RlgrmwhTnb1iIpd4ONrYdrgELV.
This is just a patch. Not the complete firmware. Typically only the full firmware is shared here not just a patch. Entire firmware will be much larger then 72MB. You were able to locate the questions and answers forum but the rom forum is where this belongs. There is a thread in there with complete stock firmware downloads.
Sent from my moto g(6) plus using Tapatalk
yea well im done caring. at least im trying my ass off to get the updated firmware for this specific model since no one else seems to give a damn about this device. this was my last ditch effort. i already switched to a z2 force so good luck to everyone on this. and ive already tried multiple times giving this device away to anyone thats a dev cause i intended on buying a new one but not one person wanted it so im just tossing it at this point. best of luck. if someone thinks they do something with this go for it.
Xplorer4x4 said:
This is just a patch. Not the complete firmware. Typically only the full firmware is shared here not just a patch. Entire firmware will be much larger then 72MB. You were able to locate the questions and answers forum but the rom forum is where this belongs. There is a thread in there with complete stock firmware downloads.
Sent from my moto g(6) plus using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am on a G6+ so throw a fit if you want. We have a dev who will be getting a device soon and I myself am attempting to build los 15.1 to solve the 1 remaining bug we have on Oreo-based roms/GSIs.
That said, I'm glad you're trying to help the community but there is a right way and a wrong way. Generic no detailed information posts like this can be dangerous. Is this OTA1 is it OTA2 is it OTA3? What firmware version is this to upgrade from and to? I see the version in the file name when clicking the link to your G Drive, but that doesn't help users searching through XDA who might find this patch useful. I don't think a google search result that showed this post would convert the URL to the file name. So even google search wouldn't know what to make of your post. Is it a flashable zip or is it flashed via the bootloader with fastboot? In either case how does a n00b know how to do that? I forget the Boost Mobile variant is a Jeter not Aljeter to which there is not even a firmware posted for(although I believe the Aljeter firmware can be used anyways and gives you a more stock google experience I guess). I did not say take down the patch, it's worthless, etc. I did say it is not typical to share them here. If you truly want to help members provide the proper/necessary information. If you want to cry and whine, don't expect sympathy. Pack your bags, and move on to your new device. You could probably sell it and recover some investment by keeping in mind there is a market segment who cares nothing about custom roms and such and may like to buy the device.
i would def like to know who this dev is then cause the only one that was doing anything has already messaged me saying they dont want the device lol. the boost mobile variant has only had one update so i didnt bother saying anything beside ota zip for boost mobile because its the only one we have recieved for our device model if people cant read thats there problem. its frustration as all hell to have someone saying what your saying right now when there is like me and one other guy it seems trying our hardest for this device and everyone else is like "hey lets watch the jeter guys fail". i had planned on cleaning up the post when im not as pissed about owning a phone with so little support. if you have any friends or dev friends that have this model and would be kind enough to pull a better ota file for us PLEASE be my guest.
Xplorer4x4 said:
I am on a G6+ so throw a fit if you want. We have a dev who will be getting a device soon and I myself am attempting to build los 15.1 to solve the 1 remaining bug we have on Oreo-based roms/GSIs.
That said, I'm glad you're trying to help the community but there is a right way and a wrong way. Generic no detailed information posts like this can be dangerous. Is this OTA1 is it OTA2 is it OTA3? What firmware version is this to upgrade from and to? I see the version in the file name when clicking the link to your G Drive, but that doesn't help users searching through XDA who might find this patch useful. I don't think a google search result that showed this post would convert the URL to the file name. So even google search wouldn't know what to make of your post. Is it a flashable zip or is it flashed via the bootloader with fastboot? In either case how does a n00b know how to do that? I forget the Boost Mobile variant is a Jeter not Aljeter to which there is not even a firmware posted for(although I believe the Aljeter firmware can be used anyways and gives you a more stock google experience I guess). I did not say take down the patch, it's worthless, etc. I did say it is not typical to share them here. If you truly want to help members provide the proper/necessary information. If you want to cry and whine, don't expect sympathy. Pack your bags, and move on to your new device. You could probably sell it and recover some investment by keeping in mind there is a market segment who cares nothing about custom roms and such and may like to buy the device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just got the notification for update from Oct to Nov security patch. I'll download tonight. Xt1922-7
Version info
Xplorer4x4 said:
I am on a G6+ so throw a fit if you want. We have a dev who will be getting a device soon and I myself am attempting to build los 15.1 to solve the 1 remaining bug we have on Oreo-based roms/GSIs.
That said, I'm glad you're trying to help the community but there is a right way and a wrong way. Generic no detailed information posts like this can be dangerous. Is this OTA1 is it OTA2 is it OTA3? What firmware version is this to upgrade from and to? I see the version in the file name when clicking the link to your G Drive, but that doesn't help users searching through XDA who might find this patch useful. I don't think a google search result that showed this post would convert the URL to the file name. So even google search wouldn't know what to make of your post. Is it a flashable zip or is it flashed via the bootloader with fastboot? In either case how does a n00b know how to do that? I forget the Boost Mobile variant is a Jeter not Aljeter to which there is not even a firmware posted for(although I believe the Aljeter firmware can be used anyways and gives you a more stock google experience I guess). I did not say take down the patch, it's worthless, etc. I did say it is not typical to share them here. If you truly want to help members provide the proper/necessary information. If you want to cry and whine, don't expect sympathy. Pack your bags, and move on to your new device. You could probably sell it and recover some investment by keeping in mind there is a market segment who cares nothing about custom roms and such and may like to buy the device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Contrary to what you said about no firmwares being around for the Boost Mobile variant of the G6 Play, but, there is firmware available for it, even though it uses the Sprint branded firmware the firmwares are still there for it, after use the phone will provision and activate itself for Boost Mobile per your account that's attached to it, here's a direct link to the firmwares for it: Sprint firmwares for JETER XT-1922-7, it even has the latest firmware for the last OTA patch we got for the November Security Patch Level
---------- Post added at 04:37 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:35 AM ----------
Xplorer4x4 said:
I am on a G6+ so throw a fit if you want. We have a dev who will be getting a device soon and I myself am attempting to build los 15.1 to solve the 1 remaining bug we have on Oreo-based roms/GSIs.
That said, I'm glad you're trying to help the community but there is a right way and a wrong way. Generic no detailed information posts like this can be dangerous. Is this OTA1 is it OTA2 is it OTA3? What firmware version is this to upgrade from and to? I see the version in the file name when clicking the link to your G Drive, but that doesn't help users searching through XDA who might find this patch useful. I don't think a google search result that showed this post would convert the URL to the file name. So even google search wouldn't know what to make of your post. Is it a flashable zip or is it flashed via the bootloader with fastboot? In either case how does a n00b know how to do that? I forget the Boost Mobile variant is a Jeter not Aljeter to which there is not even a firmware posted for(although I believe the Aljeter firmware can be used anyways and gives you a more stock google experience I guess). I did not say take down the patch, it's worthless, etc. I did say it is not typical to share them here. If you truly want to help members provide the proper/necessary information. If you want to cry and whine, don't expect sympathy. Pack your bags, and move on to your new device. You could probably sell it and recover some investment by keeping in mind there is a market segment who cares nothing about custom roms and such and may like to buy the device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ninjakira said:
i would def like to know who this dev is then cause the only one that was doing anything has already messaged me saying they dont want the device lol. the boost mobile variant has only had one update so i didnt bother saying anything beside ota zip for boost mobile because its the only one we have recieved for our device model if people cant read thats there problem. its frustration as all hell to have someone saying what your saying right now when there is like me and one other guy it seems trying our hardest for this device and everyone else is like "hey lets watch the jeter guys fail". i had planned on cleaning up the post when im not as pissed about owning a phone with so little support. if you have any friends or dev friends that have this model and would be kind enough to pull a better ota file for us PLEASE be my guest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Boost Mobile G6 Play has gotten 3 OTAs since I bought it last July
PimpMy5Ton said:
Contrary to what you said about no firmwares being around for the Boost Mobile variant of the G6 Play, but, there is firmware available for it, even though it uses the Sprint branded firmware the firmwares are still there for it, after use the phone will provision and activate itself for Boost Mobile per your account that's attached to it, here's a direct link to the firmwares for it: Sprint firmwares for JETER XT-1922-7, it even has the latest firmware for the last OTA patch we got for the November Security Patch Level
---------- Post added at 04:37 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:35 AM ----------
My Boost Mobile G6 Play has gotten 3 OTAs since I bought it last July
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
?? That was from a few months ago when there wasn't anything uploaded on lolinet and people were complaining about it hard. so calm down lol. We've all gotten 3 updates since then and uploaded on lolinet.
ninjakira said:
That was from a few months ago when there wasn't anything uploaded on lolinet and people were complaining about it hard. so calm down lol. We've all gotten 3 updates since then and uploaded on lolinet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm calm, just sayin' lol, I think it's funny how people don't wanna wait on development on new devices, in my opinion if you can't wait don't buy the new device, if you buy it knowing that there's not any development available for it then don't complain, it'll just be ignored.
PimpMy5Ton said:
I'm calm, just sayin' lol, I think it's funny how people don't wanna wait on development on new devices, in my opinion if you can't wait don't buy the new device, if you buy it knowing that there's not any development available for it then don't complain, it'll just be ignored.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol sorry. My customer service side took over for. Sec ? but yeah your right. Thats basically what's happened to is I've just started ignoring the people as ****ty as that does sound. Once it's out we will know lol.
I know this is an old post but...
ninjakira said:
i would def like to know who this dev is then cause the only one that was doing anything has already messaged me saying they dont want the device lol. the boost mobile variant has only had one update so i didnt bother saying anything beside ota zip for boost mobile because its the only one we have recieved for our device model if people cant read thats there problem. its frustration as all hell to have someone saying what your saying right now when there is like me and one other guy it seems trying our hardest for this device and everyone else is like "hey lets watch the jeter guys fail". i had planned on cleaning up the post when im not as pissed about owning a phone with so little support. if you have any friends or dev friends that have this model and would be kind enough to pull a better ota file for us PLEASE be my guest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In no way do I consider myself a developer, as I am certified n00b status.
But after reading this thread, I've decided to accomplish a goal I've had in mind for a while, for which I have found very little documentation. If I am successful, I'll post a guide. I'm glad the people who know what they're doing can login to sites like this and give the little guys a fighting chance. Thanks!
KnowNoNapsNever said:
In no way do I consider myself a developer, as I am certified n00b status.
But after reading this thread, I've decided to accomplish a goal I've had in mind for a while, for which I have found very little documentation. If I am successful, I'll post a guide. I'm glad the people who know what they're doing can login to sites like this and give the little guys a fighting chance. Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude this post is old. Like a year old now. I've made the guide for decrypting and rooting and even reflashing stock firmware that I also keep updated. I highly advise you to read everything within the Moto g6 play forum to make sure your not basically gonna be copying me and or just gonna create another guide that will have no point in it actually being here because my guide already covers it.
ninjakira said:
Dude this post is old. Like a year old now. I've made the guide for decrypting and rooting and even reflashing stock firmware that I also keep updated. I highly advise you to read everything within the Moto g6 play forum to make sure your not basically gonna be copying me and or just gonna create another guide that will have no point in it actually being here because my guide already covers it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're being a ****, ****. I was literally thanking you guys, I acknowledged it was an od thread in the title. I thanked you, and the other handful of devs for helping out guys like me, who don't have all of the knowledge to develop themselves, or the money to buy a nicer phone with more support. Anyway I don't hold grudges and I still appreciate your contributions. I'm trying to update mine to Pie but can't find any official files to do so. Anyways ill figure it out, it's just that my moms pixel 2 just broke and we don't have the money to fix it just yet to im really trying to get my jeter ready for her because she needs the phone in order to work. But before all of this i was going to try and compile a custom kernel from scratch for the jeter, for use with the news Andrax Pentesting Framework so that I could finally experience airodump/wifite without external adapter. looks like its gonna have to wait. mom comes first. have a good night bro see ya around.:good:
KnowNoNapsNever said:
You're being a ****, ****. I was literally thanking you guys, I acknowledged it was an od thread in the title. I thanked you, and the other handful of devs for helping out guys like me, who don't have all of the knowledge to develop themselves, or the money to buy a nicer phone with more support. Anyway I don't hold grudges and I still appreciate your contributions. I'm trying to update mine to Pie but can't find any official files to do so. Anyways ill figure it out, it's just that my moms pixel 2 just broke and we don't have the money to fix it just yet to im really trying to get my jeter ready for her because she needs the phone in order to work. But before all of this i was going to try and compile a custom kernel from scratch for the jeter, for use with the news Andrax Pentesting Framework so that I could finally experience airodump/wifite without external adapter. looks like its gonna have to wait. mom comes first. have a good night bro see ya around.:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you wanna think I'm a **** for being honest with you and forward instead of sugarcoating stuff then go ahead. You said your making a guide. I simply said make sure it's not a guide that already been made because so far we have 5 threads about gsi's and other useless threads that have kinda cluttered this forum and or stuff that my guide covers because once again. There is already enough clutter on the forum. https://forum.xda-developers.com/g6-play/development/ota-moto-g6-play-aljeter-t3921877. To answer your question after being a called a **** that's what your looking for. You have to be on the January security patch to even take/flash it. If you took an Oreo update after the January 1st security patch which I do believe is February 1st for oreo you are out of luck on getting pie until the stock firmware is uploaded on mirrors.
KnowNoNapsNever said:
You're being a ****, ****.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This unacceptable conduct for XDA. This community is very open to free speech, but personal attacks are not welcome, allowed, or tolerated. I'm not going to report it because the mods have enough work as it is. However, I am going to take the time to educate you on XDA's rules regarding language.
"2.1 Language: XDA is a worldwide community. As a result, what may be OK to say in your part of the world, may not be OK elsewhere. Please don't direct profanity, sexually explicit language or other offensive content toward Members or their work. Conversely, while reading posts from other members, remember that the word you find offensive may not be offensive to the writer. Tolerance is a two-way street." -- Emphasis, mine. Source: XDA Announcement.
Please be civil. That was uncalled for. The guy you were responding to was only trying to avoid more mass confusion, because we have too many guides already.

Categories

Resources