Hi
Some time ago, I purchased this smartphone - I think I picked the quadcore variant and was sure of that until now.
The model I have is SM-N910C, so this should be the exynos version, right?
Now that I want to install the TWRP recovery, I saw many different versions for each different model.
Just to be sure, I checked again, if I really have the proper version and it now seems that my Note 4 actually has the octacore.
So, in short, here's my question: How do I make 100% certain, which model I have and which chipset it uses without looking at the processor itself?
Apparently, the model displayed in download mode is accurate.....
According to some members, the info in download mode is 'hardcoded' into the device, and nothing can change it..... apparently.
http://i.imgur.com/rVnFwJM.jpg
ok, I finally could clarify which cpu is actually in my note 4: it's the exynos octacore.
Since it's a 64bit cpu, I consider this to be a happy accident
Utsuho Reiuji said:
ok, I finally could clarify which cpu is actually in my note 4: it's the exynos octacore.
Since it's a 64bit cpu, I consider this to be a happy accident
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry to burst your bubble but eventhough exynos 5433 chipset with 4xARM cortex A53 and 4xARM cortex A57 supports 64 bit, neither the rom nor the kernel is 64 bit enabled.
neondragon1909 said:
Sorry to burst your bubble but eventhough exynos 5433 chipset with 4xARM cortex A53 and 4xARM cortex A57 supports 64 bit, neither the rom nor the kernel is 64 bit enabled.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, I'm aware of that, but still, having the 64 bit core is already fine even though I cannot really use its advantages.
Utsuho Reiuji said:
Oh, I'm aware of that, but still, having the 64 bit core is already fine even though I cannot really use its advantages.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
true
Related
B) another question: the octa core version supports 4G LTE doesnt it? or snapdragon has better 4G support?
Snapdragon 600 (1.9ghz speed, 4 cores) or Exynos 5 Octa(4 cores A15, clocked at 1.6ghz+ 4 cores 1.2GHZ A7)
1) what is faster? exynos or snapdragon?
2) which one is more effectively? (battery friendly)? (***in both high-huge use and low-idle use.. in which one battery life are better)
3) there are any benchmarks test for both of them.?
i just dont know which one is better..
Adreno 320 GPU vs PowerVR SGX 544MP3
4) which one is stronger?
5) i really dont know which version should i get.. US version(with 1.9ghz) or international(1.6ghz) their performance are really similar?
6) there is any stronger smartphone out now?
6) will the galaxy s4 have wireless charging?
MUSIC:
7) what about music? is there any quality speakers?
8) headphone will be HD/ very good quality.. ? (like in iPhone 5)?
8)
1) the snapdragon is over clocked so is supposed to be faster in cpu but the exynos won't lack behind.
2) for battery of course the exynos since only 4 cores will be running so if ur doing a low use the A7 will be running which are great for battery life and when you kick it to high use that's when the bug guns A15 come in play.
3)for the exynos no because it is not available yet but for the snapdragon it got the twice score of an iphone 5 so that gives a clear answer.
4)i think that would go to the powerVr since the exynos version is expected to be better in Gpu.
5)that depends on you.
6)of course it will but will be optional.
7) the speakers are supposed to be good than the previous models.
8) i am not sure about that but even if they aren't there are always beats.
hope i gave you a clear answer and if there is anything else you would like to know let me know.
Blackwolf10 said:
1) the snapdragon is over clocked so is supposed to be faster in cpu but the exynos won't lack behind.
2) for battery of course the exynos since only 4 cores will be running so if ur doing a low use the A7 will be running which are great for battery life and when you kick it to high use that's when the bug guns A15 come in play.
3)for the exynos no because it is not available yet but for the snapdragon it got the twice score of an iphone 5 so that gives a clear answer.
4)i think that would go to the powerVr since the exynos version is expected to be better in Gpu.
5)that depends on you.
6)of course it will but will be optional.
7) the speakers are supposed to be good than the previous models.
8) i am not sure about that but even if they aren't there are always beats.
hope i gave you a clear answer and if there is anything else you would like to know let me know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for taking your time for answering me
do you think exyons 5 will be overclock-able? i hope we will be able to get 1.8ghz or something without losing battery life or something..
yes i think after rooting and few kernel releases you will be able to overclock the Cpu and maybe also the Gpu but why would you need that the exynos on the galaxy s4 is already going to be a beast and it's expected to be in par with the snapdragon and also your welcome
Actually the Exynos is better in every aspect (battery speed and gpu) clock speeds don't mean anything a15s are faster than krait fullstop
S4 INFO
re
4 core?, I guess its Octo-core Exynos
Well unless you don't use both of them, you can't figure out which one is better.
May be someone may use and let us know.
well even if the exynos is better in every aspect the biggest advantage would still be low task using so its battery saving so everything else is probably the same or little difference and what do you mean clock speeds don't mean anything ?? have you seen the benchmark difference between the galaxy s4 and the htc one ?? and i know the A155 are better than krait that's why the snapdragon is overclocked
@samsingh02 it is octa core but like 4+4 so the 8 cores will never function together it would be like A7 for the low tasks and the A15 when you are on a heavy task like gaming
anyway the thing is the snapdragon is for 4G network and the exynos for the 3G network end of story.
Blackwolf10 said:
well even if the exynos is better in every aspect the biggest advantage would still be low task using so its battery saving so everything else is probably the same or little difference
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't bother to explain it has been done to much and speed is actually a big factor to make a long story short read this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2191850
and i know the A155 are better than krait that's why the snapdragon is overclocked
@samsingh02 it is octa core but like 4+4 so the 8 cores will never function together it would be like A7 for the low tasks and the A15 when you are on a heavy task like gaming
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the while point
anyway the thing is the snapdragon is for 4G network and the exynos for the 3G network end of story.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some benchmarks show Exynos having 4g compatibility
S4 INFO
but that would be the galaxy note 2 exynos 4 because the exynos 5 on the galaxy s4 is not out yet the only exynos 5 is on the nexus 10
Blackwolf10 said:
but that would be the galaxy note 2 exynos 4 because the exynos 5 on the galaxy s4 is not out yet the only exynos 5 is on the nexus 10
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exynos 5 in the nexus 10 is dual core
But the second part
Where did Exynos 4 come from what are u talking about
S4 INFO
i know it's clocked at 1.7 and i was talking about the note 2 i read in the Xda here that it was available on a carrier in the U.S. with the exynos
You can see here which countries will get the octa core version and which countries will get the Snapdragon version
http://goo.gl/EePDg
B) another question: the octa core version supports 4G LTE doesnt it? or snapdragon has better 4G support?
darixtorento said:
B) another question: the octa core version upports 4G LTE doesnt it? or snapdragon has better 4G support?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just to butt in, doesn't Exynos octa also have LTE support? I want to know what bands it supports.
Sent from my Xperia Arc S using xda premium
I am planning to buy S4
But I'm not sure which is better
Snapdragon 600
1.9 Ghz
Quad Core Krait 300.
or
Exynos5
1.6 Ghz Octal Core
Quad Core Cortex A15 / Quad Core A7
4g and installing roms is not important to me
Which is better in terms of performance? less lag ?
Which is better for gaming?
Yet another thread
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo7nJQzfWsE&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Look at that review and make your mind up
~ Taylor_Swift
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note II GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD
................
an9093 said:
I am planning to buy S4
But I'm not sure which is better
Snapdragon 600
1.9 Ghz
Quad Core Krait 300.
or
Exynos5
1.6 Ghz Octal Core
Quad Core Cortex A15 / Quad Core A7
4g and installing roms is not important to me
Which is better in terms of performance? less lag ?
Which is better for gaming?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
Look HERE
That's a no brainer....the Exy. But does anyone really have a choice? Especially in America.
i have a choice they both are available the same price with local warrenty
The exynos here is cheaper online but for me, no 4G = no go. Since buying an S3 4G last year there is no way I can go back to 3G again.
The speed difference is enormous and 4G here costs no more than 3G. And on the Telstra network it's even better. Have hit over 50mbps on speed tests.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda premium
dman777 said:
That's a no brainer....the Exy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Except it really isn't.
Sent from my Qualcomm Galaxy S4
Over simplifying it the Octacore version is slightly faster but has a poorer battery (4G not withstanding). Snapdragon touch slower (but faster than most phones todsy) but it'll last longer. There are lots of debates on whether the Octacore version ca be improved but this is how it stands right now as the biggest differences.
Other option is Stock version......
-Airax
Pagnell said:
Except it really isn't.
Sent from my Qualcomm Galaxy S4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, in this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeRcKHF4bDc&feature=youtu.be&a the girl states that she can not tell a difference between the two....except in GPU power. So, if you like to have less GPU power...then yes, the Qualcomm would be what you want.
dman777 said:
Well, in this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeRcKHF4bDc&feature=youtu.be&a the girl states that she can not tell a difference between the two....except in GPU power. So, if you like to have less GPU power...then yes, the Qualcomm would be what you want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have that a little backwards: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=40554113
Also, go and ask any cedarview Atom owners what they think of the PowerVR SGX54x and the driver 'support' it gets. After that fiasco I would never buy another product that has a GPU from Imagination Technologies.
XTCrefugee said:
You have that a little backwards: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=40554113
Also, go and ask any cedarview Atom owners what they think of the PowerVR SGX54x and the driver 'support' it gets. After that fiasco I would never buy another product that has a GPU from Imagination Technologies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is interesting. But seeing for myself in that video, it is hard not to believe that the Exy GPU is better.
dman777 said:
Well, in this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeRcKHF4bDc&feature=youtu.be&a the girl states that she can not tell a difference between the two....except in GPU power. So, if you like to have less GPU power...then yes, the Qualcomm would be what you want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm still waiting to see what makes the Exynos version a 'no brainer'. Was that it?
Sent from my Qualcomm Galaxy S4
Pagnell said:
I'm still waiting to see what makes the Exynos version a 'no brainer'. Was that it?
Sent from my Qualcomm Galaxy S4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, no problem....It was "Exynos takes the edge, ie camera and GPU". You can also watch the video and see...physical proof is nice.
I see. So for someone who needs 4G and has a preference for CM or AOKP the Exynos is still a 'no brainer' simply because it's performance is slightly better on certain benchmarks?
Sent from my Qualcomm Galaxy S4
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
????????????
Why are you saying Exynos GPU is better than S600? I saw benchmarks where the Adreno 320 beat the powerVR SGX544 (though benchmarks are sometimes useless ^^)
Exynooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooos
ive seen many vids on youtube about the two devices and i gotta say there not a big diffrenet in perfrmance
just get the one that available in your country
Hi,
I just download CPU-Z from Google Play here:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.cpuid.cpu_z
But I'm amazed because it identifies Nexus10 CPU manufacturer as ARM instead of Samsung. In fact CPU manufacturer detected is 0x41, that is ARM not Samsung...
Please, can any owner of another Nexus10 run CPU-Z in order to know if there is the same issue or is just related to my processor.
Thanks and best regards.
Well it is an ARM core design, and the GPU is a straight ARM design as well.
EniGmA1987 said:
Well it is an ARM core design, and the GPU is a straight ARM design as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, but I have a serious overheating problem with my nexus 10. Maybe it can be avoided if there are different processors used in nexus 10 build. That's why I ask if someone can check it in his/her machine, to know if it's possible.
Thanks and best regards.
No one has a different processor, and the overheating affects everyone. Pretty much anything you do will always hit thermal throttling which is why everyone should run a custom kernel since that tweaks the way throttling works.
EniGmA1987 said:
No one has a different processor
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's exactly what I want to confirm. Sometimes internal parts were changed/replaced due to lack of stock (and it was a common situation for the nexus 10).
Did you run CPU-Z to check the processor?
Thanks and best regards.
VivaErBetis said:
That's exactly what I want to confirm. Sometimes internal parts were changed/replaced due to lack of stock (and it was a common situation for the nexus 10).
Did you run CPU-Z to check the processor?
Thanks and best regards.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is ARM, mostly. Mali, the GPU portion of the chip, is from ARM.
BTW, there were too few Nexus 10 devices sold to have a part shortage. Even the Surface RT outsold the Nexus 10.
VivaErBetis said:
That's exactly what I want to confirm. Sometimes internal parts were changed/replaced due to lack of stock (and it was a common situation for the nexus 10).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do you think some Nexus 10's have a different processor? I highly doubt they put in anything other than an Exynos 5 Dual and yet only list that CPU on their official specs page. More likely is that CPU-Z simply doesn't have a complete database of all the ARM processors out there, particularly since the Nexus 10 is the first Android device with a Cortex A15 CPU and there still aren't that many A15 CPUs out there.
joakim_one said:
Why do you think some Nexus 10's have a different processor? I highly doubt they put in anything other than an Exynos 5 Dual and yet only list that CPU on their official specs page. More likely is that CPU-Z simply doesn't have a complete database of all the ARM processors out there, particularly since the Nexus 10 is the first Android device with a Cortex A15 CPU and there still aren't that many A15 CPUs out there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Note the "Field Name" is CPU Architecture, not CPU. This is an important distinction, because CPU-Z is identifying the CPU "type" not the exact make/model from that manufacturer.
Samsung's Exynos CPU used in the N10 was advertised as using the latest "licensed Cortex ARM" design of A15. For more detail see http://www.arm.com/products/processors/cortex-a/index.php for a list of the various ARM-A designs.
ARM doesn't necessarily produce the processors themselves, but develops and then licenses the IP to the various CPU manufacturers that want to create ARM "type" CPU's. Even though it's modified, Qualcomm still pays for the IP so that their instruction sets for Krait are compatible with the competition.
So with CPU-Z, you'll see "ARM Cortex-A15" for our N10's and "Krait" on my Samsung GS3.
SeaFractor said:
Note the "Field Name" is CPU Architecture, not CPU. This is an important distinction, because CPU-Z is identifying the CPU "type" not the exact make/model from that manufacturer.
Samsung's Exynos CPU used in the N10 was advertised as using the latest "licensed Cortex ARM" design of A15. For more detail see http://www.arm.com/products/processors/cortex-a/index.php for a list of the various ARM-A designs.
ARM doesn't necessarily produce the processors themselves, but develops and then licenses the IP to the various CPU manufacturers that want to create ARM "type" CPU's. Even though it's modified, Qualcomm still pays for the IP so that their instruction sets for Krait are compatible with the competition.
So with CPU-Z, you'll see "ARM Cortex-A15" for our N10's and "Krait" on my Samsung GS3.
View attachment 2071624
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm well aware of how ARM licensing works. If you look at his screenshot, it doesn't identify his processor as a Samsung Exynos 5, but your screenshot shows a Qualcomm Snapdragon S4. That is probably because they don't have the Exynos 5 in their database yet.
Thanks for all the answers. I contacted CPU-Z devs to ask about this issue and they change the soc recognition in the new version published today.
Which one do i get!?!?!?! I cant decide... help me!
I don't think i will get 4G anytime soon (too expensive on my network) so i really don't know which version to get? which on has better battery life etc..
pls help, detailed answers will be really helpful. I need to make a decision before Friday.
I suggest, go for S4 I9500 Octa-Core. Check my detailed previous reply to a similar question.
| Mobile Message
Octa= heads, quad=tails..good luck Mine was tails and I'm very happy with it. Did you do any research yet? Enough on the web about it.
Dr.Engineer said:
I suggest, go for S4 I9500 Octa-Core. Check my detailed previous reply to a similar question.
| Mobile Message
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When i click to see your previous posts i get this 'Search is temporarily unavailable. We apologize for the inconvenience.'
Can you give me the link?
Thanks
I would recommend the quad core. I have the octa cor myself but the quad core is said to have better battery life and it has LOTS of custom roms
Octa core is not octa at all. It's rather dual quad. Eight cores never work at once in this cpu. This is so called big little architecture designed to save battery while keeping high cpu power. Looks like this attempt failed for now. Take a look at gsm arena comparison.
IMHO 9505 is way better deal.
Snapdragon Galaxy S4
slig said:
Octa core is not octa at all. It's rather dual quad. Eight cores never work at once in this cpu. This is so called big little architecture designed to save battery while keeping high cpu power. Looks like this attempt failed for now. Take a look at gsm arena comparison.
IMHO 9505 is way better deal.
Snapdragon Galaxy S4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont think it failed entirely. If the exynos 1.6GHz quad can beat the 1.9GHz quad Krait in terms of performance than that's a feat in itself.
Get the one which is officially sold in your country.
Gogeta_138 said:
pls help, detailed answers will be really helpful. I need to make a decision before Friday.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well..it's Friday did you make a decision?
Boes40 said:
Well..it's Friday did you make a decision?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yepp getting the quad core one.. i9505
Thanks for all the help guys
You made the best decision enjoy!
I have the octa core and i love it! Although I would add that i do not have the quad core to compare with. Both are great.
In the end it all boils down to LTE or not to LTE. I chose not to. For me, anything above 3Mbps is quite handy. And i get 6Mbps+ approx on my AT&T prepaid HSPA+.
slig said:
Octa core is not octa at all. It's rather dual quad. Eight cores never work at once in this cpu. This is so called big little architecture designed to save battery while keeping high cpu power. Looks like this attempt failed for now. Take a look at gsm arena comparison.
IMHO 9505 is way better deal.
Snapdragon Galaxy S4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually all the 8cores could together but just not ATM , only after Hmp will be implemented.
Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk
octa 11 hours talk time, quad 18 hours talk time, according to a review.
John.
Tinderbox (UK) said:
octa 11 hours talk time, quad 18 hours talk time, according to a review.
John.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s4_i9500_vs_i9505-review-930p6.php
"Performance-wise, the octa-core Exynos has a slight advantage, but that's not because of the higher number of cores. You have got to remember that only a single set of four cores is active at a any single time - either the power-sipping Cortex A7's or the number-crunching Cortex A15's.
It is evident from our tests however, that the Exynos version of the Galaxy S4 is not much more powerful than the Snapdragon 600. Furthermore, the battery life performance of the Exynos-touting variant is consistently worse than the one by the Snapdragon 600 version."
Which is why i picked i9505. Almost no difference in speed but big difference in battery. My i9505 lasts almost 2 days sometimes.
I want a Exynos version of note 4, snapdragon 805 was kind of a disappointment.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Unlocked-NE...1446740372?pt=Cell_Phones&hash=item1c46ca3194
This is on eBay right now, should I get it?
Questions:
1, Will there be a English option?
2, Will the phone be any different from the USA version?
3, If Android L come out, can I update it directly from the phone, or I have to do it manually?
4, Would I get 4g on Simple Mobile?(Simple Mobile is basically like T-mobile, they use T-mobile tower)
5, Do you recommend buying a Korean version?
Why is snapdragon disappointing?
Stigga said:
Why is snapdragon disappointing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Was hoping for a 808 or 810.
Snapdragon 805 is disappointing? Really? Exynos is better?
Zhoene said:
Snapdragon 805 is disappointing? Really? Exynos is better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, is octa-core and 64 bit.
Saw a benchmark test between those two, exynos score a little higher.
If you were me, and price don't better.
Would you get snapdragon or exynos?
Kenny243 said:
Well, is octa-core and 64 bit.
Saw a benchmark test between those two, exynos score a little higher.
If you were me, and price don't better.
Would you get snapdragon or exynos?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's really never octal-core or 64bit. It mostly runs in quad core "mode" and is never in 64bit. Yes, it's capable of 64bit, but think of it like installing the 32bit version of windows on a 64bit machine. It's useless. Benchmarks don't matter. The exynos version is optimized for benchmarks, so it scores high in them, but is actually slower in real world use. Get the snapdragon.
From the benchmarks I saw, some of the exynos tests come up slower than Note3, some are faster than snapdragon note4, but IMO the biggest advantage could be 64 bit mode on Exynos. On the other hand who knows how is this 64bit Android going to work and when? Also make sure that radio is compatible with frequncies used in your area, what good is the phone if you get stuck on edge or have trouble making calls because half of the frequencies are missing? When I bought galaxy s3 couple years ago, it supposed to have LTE, but later it came out it didn't, there might be some similar surprises with Note 4 in the future as well.
Humm
Do you know the most reliable website to buy a unlocked Galaxy Note 4?
Kenny243 said:
Was hoping for a 808 or 810.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Such dumb replies. The S805 is great already.
Kitkat is not 64bit capable so its not using this feature now. Android L will be.
aooga said:
It's really never octal-core or 64bit. It mostly runs in quad core "mode" and is never in 64bit. Yes, it's capable of 64bit, but think of it like installing the 32bit version of windows on a 64bit machine. It's useless. Benchmarks don't matter. The exynos version is optimized for benchmarks, so it scores high in them, but is actually slower in real world use. Get the snapdragon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exynos version optimized for benchmarks ??? XDD
Lodix said:
Exynos version optimized for benchmarks ??? XDD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes..it is. Notice how the benchmarks are always insanely high but the performance is slightly slower?
aooga said:
Yes..it is. Notice how the benchmarks are always insanely high but the performance is slightly slower?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all, You shouldn't tell opinions as True Statements...
Have you ever had any phone to compare by yourself ???
Samsung sttoped "cheating" in benchmarks since the Note 3, and it was mostly done in the QUALCOMM VERSION.
Lodix said:
First of all, You shouldn't tell opinions as True Statements...
Have you ever had any phone to compare by yourself ???
Samsung sttoped "cheating" in benchmarks since the Note 3, and it was mostly done in the QUALCOMM VERSION.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never said they cheated anything. Its just optimized for benchmarks so people think its faster than it is (runs all 8 cores at one, but never does that in real use). I have used it BTW. I have a galaxy tab with an exynos processor that lags a lot pushing a 1440p display...same as the note 4. I tried a snapdragon one out in best buy and it didn't lag at all.
It is a true statement. That's like saying a Ferrari being faster than a civic is an opinion.
aooga said:
I never said they cheated anything. Its just optimized for benchmarks so people think its faster than it is (runs all 8 cores at one, but never does that in real use). I have used it BTW. I have a galaxy tab with an exynos processor that lags a lot pushing a 1440p display...same as the note 4. I tried a snapdragon one out in best buy and it didn't lag at all.
It is a true statement. That's like saying a Ferrari being faster than a civic is an opinion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is not, Samsung doesn't change at all their CPU from the "stock" ARM desings. So it is a pure Cortex AX. They don't this kind of things, Anandtech searched for that.
The Exynos 5420 has a weaker GPU compared to Snapdragon 800mso it normal. But don't say that the Note 4 lags as well becausw your tablet lags...
Lodix said:
It is not, Samsung doesn't change at all their CPU from the "stock" ARM desings. So it is a pure Cortex AX. They don't this kind of things, Anandtech searched for that.
The Exynos 5420 has a weaker GPU compared to Snapdragon 800mso it normal. But don't say that the Note 4 lags as well becausw your tablet lags...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I said it would be slower, not lag. This is based on 3 generations of Samsung processors before. If they finally changed it to actually be competitive, good for them.
All of my other points are fully valid though.
aooga said:
I said it would be slower, not lag. This is based on 3 generations of Samsung processors before. If they finally changed it to actually be competitive, good for them.
All of my other points are fully valid though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I had good speriences with Exynos SOCs.
And my Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 with a Snapdragon 800 lags either.