Yup, looks like a new variant is coming. With a 64-bit Snapdragon 410 CPU. Kernel sources are already available on OSRC.
http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=specs&id=7666&view=1&c=samsung_gt-i9195i_galaxy_s4_mini_plus_4g_lte
It will be supported big guy?? If yes, maybe i could buy it
Probably not by me. The SoC is different, so I would have to own the device myself in order to do a CM bringup.
That chip maybe 64-bit capable but i feel dual krait 300 cpu is miles ahead of quad cortex a53. still s4 mini og is a great midranger.
Hi !
What is the model number please ?
Thanks in advance !
Envoyé de mon iPod touch en utilisant Tapatalk
GT-I9195I
why would they make this? s5 mini is out and s6 mini is likely in the works.
GT-i9195I Galaxy S4 Mini Plus 4G LTE
arco68 said:
Yup, looks like a new variant is coming. With a 64-bit Snapdragon 410 CPU. Kernel sources are already available on OSRC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GT-i9195I Galaxy S4 Mini Plus 4G LTE
Using
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, 1200MHz CPU
4x ARM Cortex-A53 MPcore
Qualcomm Adreno 306
instead of
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8930AB, 1728MHz CPU
2x Qualcomm Krait 300
Qualcomm Adreno 305
Is it possible to install CyanogenMod I9195 on this device?
Or does it need a different kernel?
Are there benchmarks around for Snapdragon-410?
Are there any differences in performance to be expected?
Thank you.
EDV-Oellinger said:
GT-i9195I Galaxy S4 Mini Plus 4G LTE
Is it possible to install CyanogenMod I9195 on this device?
Or does it need a different kernel?
Are there benchmarks around for Snapdragon-410?
Are there any differences in performance to be expected?
Thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NO. You cannot install I9195 cyanogenmod onto that.
It uses different chipset and needs its own sources for a ROM/ Kernel.
Benchmark results are pretty much similar. There are many android phones with snap 410 chip.
They get around 20000 to 22000. My S4 mini running lollipop gets 24K to 25K.
And overall similar in performance. Not sure if the 64-bit sd 410 is better than sd 400 when running lollipop.
civicsr2cool said:
why would they make this? s5 mini is out and s6 mini is likely in the works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because those other Mini's are all more massive. The specs for this new S4mini Plus indicate it is only 1 gram over the 107 gm of original S4mini models. My 9190 is about 7 gm below original, thanks to having downsized her battery. Most people probably would not appreciate the lighter weight as much as I do.
new Mod i9195i
Recently I bought this new S4 mini (gt-I9195I). I'm very satisfied with it...
Does anyone build a new/rooted mod for this device? Or where can I buy/request such mod? I also posted an question in the Q/A topic of the S4 mini.
Thanks for your effort.
EDV-Oellinger said:
GT-i9195I Galaxy S4 Mini Plus 4G LTE
Using
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, 1200MHz CPU
4x ARM Cortex-A53 MPcore
Qualcomm Adreno 306
instead of
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8930AB, 1728MHz CPU
2x Qualcomm Krait 300
Qualcomm Adreno 305
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, i just found this thread and it appears that my recently purchased S4 mini is i9195i. The phone was advertised as the 2nd spec. (1,7GHz dual core). Is this an ok deal performance wise? Thanks.
Recently my friend and I both bought a S4 mini at the same provider. I got an I9195, he got an I9195i. Performance wise both are very satisfactory. It only seems that the battery of the I9195i lasts (a lot) longer. Don't know if that can be explained by the different processor.
---------- Post added at 10:14 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:10 AM ----------
And another difference: I9195i comes with Android 4.4.4!
Do you have any benchmark scores (Antutu) for the Snapdragon 410 version?
What do you mean by a lot longer? Cand you give some numbers?
nick_white said:
Do you have any benchmark scores (Antutu) for the Snapdragon 410 version?
What do you mean by a lot longer? Cand you give some numbers?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is battery drain of my i9195i while barely using the phone. Stock rom, nothing changed, only disabled syncing and 4g.
As for heavy usage it lasts about 2-3 days.
What android is that? Can you provide more pictures? Thanks
berins said:
This is battery drain of my i9195i while barely using the phone. Stock rom, nothing changed, only disabled syncing and 4g.
As for heavy usage it lasts about 2-3 days.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that the stock UI of the I9195i?
ironbg said:
What android is that? Can you provide more pictures? Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
jnvdh06 said:
Is that the stock UI of the I9195i?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, its stock UI running android 4.4.4 which came with the phone.
Here are some more pics:
berins said:
Yes, its stock UI running android 4.4.4 which came with the phone.
Here are some more pics:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wont devs be able to port this to other s4 mini variants?
berins said:
This is battery drain of my i9195i while barely using the phone. Stock rom, nothing changed, only disabled syncing and 4g.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So 12 days?? That's a lot... The best I could get was something like 7-8 days on a Trend Plus practically without using the phone; everything off, 2G mode, rooted and debloated.
Did you notice any performance related hiccups (maybe when compared to the "old" Krait 300 version)?
I feel kind of bad now that I recently bought a non-i version (the i is still not available locally) and the battery looks so much better...
Related
B) another question: the octa core version supports 4G LTE doesnt it? or snapdragon has better 4G support?
Snapdragon 600 (1.9ghz speed, 4 cores) or Exynos 5 Octa(4 cores A15, clocked at 1.6ghz+ 4 cores 1.2GHZ A7)
1) what is faster? exynos or snapdragon?
2) which one is more effectively? (battery friendly)? (***in both high-huge use and low-idle use.. in which one battery life are better)
3) there are any benchmarks test for both of them.?
i just dont know which one is better..
Adreno 320 GPU vs PowerVR SGX 544MP3
4) which one is stronger?
5) i really dont know which version should i get.. US version(with 1.9ghz) or international(1.6ghz) their performance are really similar?
6) there is any stronger smartphone out now?
6) will the galaxy s4 have wireless charging?
MUSIC:
7) what about music? is there any quality speakers?
8) headphone will be HD/ very good quality.. ? (like in iPhone 5)?
8)
1) the snapdragon is over clocked so is supposed to be faster in cpu but the exynos won't lack behind.
2) for battery of course the exynos since only 4 cores will be running so if ur doing a low use the A7 will be running which are great for battery life and when you kick it to high use that's when the bug guns A15 come in play.
3)for the exynos no because it is not available yet but for the snapdragon it got the twice score of an iphone 5 so that gives a clear answer.
4)i think that would go to the powerVr since the exynos version is expected to be better in Gpu.
5)that depends on you.
6)of course it will but will be optional.
7) the speakers are supposed to be good than the previous models.
8) i am not sure about that but even if they aren't there are always beats.
hope i gave you a clear answer and if there is anything else you would like to know let me know.
Blackwolf10 said:
1) the snapdragon is over clocked so is supposed to be faster in cpu but the exynos won't lack behind.
2) for battery of course the exynos since only 4 cores will be running so if ur doing a low use the A7 will be running which are great for battery life and when you kick it to high use that's when the bug guns A15 come in play.
3)for the exynos no because it is not available yet but for the snapdragon it got the twice score of an iphone 5 so that gives a clear answer.
4)i think that would go to the powerVr since the exynos version is expected to be better in Gpu.
5)that depends on you.
6)of course it will but will be optional.
7) the speakers are supposed to be good than the previous models.
8) i am not sure about that but even if they aren't there are always beats.
hope i gave you a clear answer and if there is anything else you would like to know let me know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for taking your time for answering me
do you think exyons 5 will be overclock-able? i hope we will be able to get 1.8ghz or something without losing battery life or something..
yes i think after rooting and few kernel releases you will be able to overclock the Cpu and maybe also the Gpu but why would you need that the exynos on the galaxy s4 is already going to be a beast and it's expected to be in par with the snapdragon and also your welcome
Actually the Exynos is better in every aspect (battery speed and gpu) clock speeds don't mean anything a15s are faster than krait fullstop
S4 INFO
re
4 core?, I guess its Octo-core Exynos
Well unless you don't use both of them, you can't figure out which one is better.
May be someone may use and let us know.
well even if the exynos is better in every aspect the biggest advantage would still be low task using so its battery saving so everything else is probably the same or little difference and what do you mean clock speeds don't mean anything ?? have you seen the benchmark difference between the galaxy s4 and the htc one ?? and i know the A155 are better than krait that's why the snapdragon is overclocked
@samsingh02 it is octa core but like 4+4 so the 8 cores will never function together it would be like A7 for the low tasks and the A15 when you are on a heavy task like gaming
anyway the thing is the snapdragon is for 4G network and the exynos for the 3G network end of story.
Blackwolf10 said:
well even if the exynos is better in every aspect the biggest advantage would still be low task using so its battery saving so everything else is probably the same or little difference
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't bother to explain it has been done to much and speed is actually a big factor to make a long story short read this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2191850
and i know the A155 are better than krait that's why the snapdragon is overclocked
@samsingh02 it is octa core but like 4+4 so the 8 cores will never function together it would be like A7 for the low tasks and the A15 when you are on a heavy task like gaming
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the while point
anyway the thing is the snapdragon is for 4G network and the exynos for the 3G network end of story.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some benchmarks show Exynos having 4g compatibility
S4 INFO
but that would be the galaxy note 2 exynos 4 because the exynos 5 on the galaxy s4 is not out yet the only exynos 5 is on the nexus 10
Blackwolf10 said:
but that would be the galaxy note 2 exynos 4 because the exynos 5 on the galaxy s4 is not out yet the only exynos 5 is on the nexus 10
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exynos 5 in the nexus 10 is dual core
But the second part
Where did Exynos 4 come from what are u talking about
S4 INFO
i know it's clocked at 1.7 and i was talking about the note 2 i read in the Xda here that it was available on a carrier in the U.S. with the exynos
You can see here which countries will get the octa core version and which countries will get the Snapdragon version
http://goo.gl/EePDg
B) another question: the octa core version supports 4G LTE doesnt it? or snapdragon has better 4G support?
darixtorento said:
B) another question: the octa core version upports 4G LTE doesnt it? or snapdragon has better 4G support?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just to butt in, doesn't Exynos octa also have LTE support? I want to know what bands it supports.
Sent from my Xperia Arc S using xda premium
I am planning to buy S4
But I'm not sure which is better
Snapdragon 600
1.9 Ghz
Quad Core Krait 300.
or
Exynos5
1.6 Ghz Octal Core
Quad Core Cortex A15 / Quad Core A7
4g and installing roms is not important to me
Which is better in terms of performance? less lag ?
Which is better for gaming?
Yet another thread
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo7nJQzfWsE&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Look at that review and make your mind up
~ Taylor_Swift
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note II GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD
................
an9093 said:
I am planning to buy S4
But I'm not sure which is better
Snapdragon 600
1.9 Ghz
Quad Core Krait 300.
or
Exynos5
1.6 Ghz Octal Core
Quad Core Cortex A15 / Quad Core A7
4g and installing roms is not important to me
Which is better in terms of performance? less lag ?
Which is better for gaming?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
Look HERE
That's a no brainer....the Exy. But does anyone really have a choice? Especially in America.
i have a choice they both are available the same price with local warrenty
The exynos here is cheaper online but for me, no 4G = no go. Since buying an S3 4G last year there is no way I can go back to 3G again.
The speed difference is enormous and 4G here costs no more than 3G. And on the Telstra network it's even better. Have hit over 50mbps on speed tests.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda premium
dman777 said:
That's a no brainer....the Exy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Except it really isn't.
Sent from my Qualcomm Galaxy S4
Over simplifying it the Octacore version is slightly faster but has a poorer battery (4G not withstanding). Snapdragon touch slower (but faster than most phones todsy) but it'll last longer. There are lots of debates on whether the Octacore version ca be improved but this is how it stands right now as the biggest differences.
Other option is Stock version......
-Airax
Pagnell said:
Except it really isn't.
Sent from my Qualcomm Galaxy S4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, in this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeRcKHF4bDc&feature=youtu.be&a the girl states that she can not tell a difference between the two....except in GPU power. So, if you like to have less GPU power...then yes, the Qualcomm would be what you want.
dman777 said:
Well, in this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeRcKHF4bDc&feature=youtu.be&a the girl states that she can not tell a difference between the two....except in GPU power. So, if you like to have less GPU power...then yes, the Qualcomm would be what you want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have that a little backwards: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=40554113
Also, go and ask any cedarview Atom owners what they think of the PowerVR SGX54x and the driver 'support' it gets. After that fiasco I would never buy another product that has a GPU from Imagination Technologies.
XTCrefugee said:
You have that a little backwards: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=40554113
Also, go and ask any cedarview Atom owners what they think of the PowerVR SGX54x and the driver 'support' it gets. After that fiasco I would never buy another product that has a GPU from Imagination Technologies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is interesting. But seeing for myself in that video, it is hard not to believe that the Exy GPU is better.
dman777 said:
Well, in this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeRcKHF4bDc&feature=youtu.be&a the girl states that she can not tell a difference between the two....except in GPU power. So, if you like to have less GPU power...then yes, the Qualcomm would be what you want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm still waiting to see what makes the Exynos version a 'no brainer'. Was that it?
Sent from my Qualcomm Galaxy S4
Pagnell said:
I'm still waiting to see what makes the Exynos version a 'no brainer'. Was that it?
Sent from my Qualcomm Galaxy S4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, no problem....It was "Exynos takes the edge, ie camera and GPU". You can also watch the video and see...physical proof is nice.
I see. So for someone who needs 4G and has a preference for CM or AOKP the Exynos is still a 'no brainer' simply because it's performance is slightly better on certain benchmarks?
Sent from my Qualcomm Galaxy S4
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
????????????
Why are you saying Exynos GPU is better than S600? I saw benchmarks where the Adreno 320 beat the powerVR SGX544 (though benchmarks are sometimes useless ^^)
Exynooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooos
ive seen many vids on youtube about the two devices and i gotta say there not a big diffrenet in perfrmance
just get the one that available in your country
Is there a performance difference between the Snapdragon 800 and Samsung Exynos 5 Octa (1.9 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A15 + 1.3 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A7) Core variants in terms of UI fluency thanks in advance.
I have had bad experience with Exynos as they become so slow after time. I will never buy one again.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using xda app-developers app
I think no difference, or it is very slight. I saw no lags during my daily usage.
Sent from my SM-N900 using xda app-developers app
ibrhmymn said:
Is there a performance difference between the Snapdragon 800 and Samsung Exynos 5 Octa (1.9 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A15 + 1.3 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A7) Core variants in terms of UI fluency thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many people here says that snapdragon is a much better option. I agree with them.
Sent from Note 3 SM-N9005
Snapdragon is LTE .. Exynos is not.. That's one difference.. The rest may be the same...
Sent from my SM-N9005 using xda app-developers app
LTE and 4K video on Snapdragon, not on Exynos. Snapdragon has little better GPU, Exynos could be tiny bit little faster on CPU side in some tests, but not others . If anybody has any issues with UI speed it is most likely not hardware issue, but software.
pete4k said:
LTE and 4K video on Snapdragon, not on Exynos. Snapdragon has little better GPU, Exynos could be tiny bit little faster on CPU side in some tests, but not others . If anybody has any issues with UI speed it is most likely not hardware issue, but software.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well - i think UI is more part of the gpu, so the gpu has to be potent.
If i ware you, ot, i would buy the SD Device. Reason? LTE and a higher cpu clock (I'm testing the wonderchild kernel - 3ghz, fast as hell
Also, there are more kernels for the SD device, as the exynos version is not so popular in many countries...
äon said:
well - i think UI is more part of the gpu, so the gpu has to be potent.
If i ware you, ot, i would buy the SD Device. Reason? LTE and a higher cpu clock (I'm testing the wonderchild kernel - 3ghz, fast as hell
Also, there are more kernels for the SD device, as the exynos version is not so popular in many countries...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thaks for your answer I ask the same question to the Samsung US Chat agent and he said Octacore variant is better in overall performance. What do you think I also closer to the Snapdragon version but I am not in US and due to that reason is there a region lock and it should be unlocked by the service provider. I could not decide.
The only reason I chose the Qcomm over the Exynos is because the former has LTE capability.
kenny1991 said:
I have had bad experience with Exynos as they become so slow after time. I will never buy one again.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you serious about that??
me too would personally prefer the snapdragon over the exynos, but your statement is crap!
if something gets slow over time it's the OS or the nand (4.3 supports the trim command, so this
should not be an issue anymore). like a pc with windows, after some time it gets full of garbage
and this has some impact on performance, not the used processor type!
ibrhmymn said:
thaks for your answer I ask the same question to the Samsung US Chat agent and he said Octacore variant is better in overall performance. What do you think I also closer to the Snapdragon version but I am not in US and due to that reason is there a region lock and it should be unlocked by the service provider. I could not decide.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it's simple.
Does you provider support LTE? ==> GET A QCOMM
It doesn't? ==> GET AN EXYNOS
I hope i could help you
Your post is crap.
How is it is when I factory reset or flash new room? Sånne sit happened to note 1 and 10.1. No more crapy exynos.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using xda app-developers app
SD800 = 4G LTE & 4k video rec.
Exynos 5 = no 4G LTE & 4k video rec.
kenny1991 said:
Your post is crap.
How is it is when I factory reset or flash new room? Sånne sit happened to note 1 and 10.1. No more crapy exynos.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, you have no idea what you are talking about, do you?
TML1504 said:
lol, you have no idea what you are talking about, do you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would like to ask about the region lock of Note 3, if for example I buy a Note 3 (n9005-snapdragon 800) from Bestbuy and I want to use it in different country which does not support lte can I use it or what should I do to use it thank you in advance
A thread where all benchmarks are posted. Especially when comparing exynos vs SD 820
http://m.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s7_and_s7_edge_benchmarked_the_exynos_flavor-news-16794.php
Sent from my SM-G925F
Seems way of if you ask me.. should kill the z5... There is deff something wrong here!
johanbiff said:
Seems way of if you ask me.. should kill the z5... There is deff something wrong here!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Z5 is rendering in 1080p so there's no surprise it comes ahead in onscreen benchmarks. The mali-gpu is also not the strongest. Pretty sure the 820 will perform better.
---------- Post added at 12:55 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:14 AM ----------
http://www.phonearena.com/news/LG-G5-shakes-hands-with-Snapdragon-820-to-shatter-AnTuTu-records-benchmark-test-scores_id78636
LG G5 seems to be scoring almost 20k higher than the exynos 8890-equipped S7. S820 looks to be the better SoC by far at this point.
https://youtu.be/qMJ2x6POZak
128k there.i guess its the exynos
Anyway not enough to surpass the iphone
http://www.antutu.com/en/view.shtml?id=8184
s3ns3lol said:
https://youtu.be/qMJ2x6POZak
128k there.i guess its the exynos
Anyway not enough to surpass the iphone
http://www.antutu.com/en/view.shtml?id=8184
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously ? Do you even know how ios and android operate ?
Sent from my SM-G925F
To sum things up: the Snapdragon 820 sports a better GPU, the Exynos 8890 sports a better CPU and a better DAC (Qualcomm DACs just haven't got the best of reputations, while the Exynos usually sport a decent Wolfson DAC), Qualcomm SOCs however usually sport a better baseband/radio than the competition.
I would say, in daily usages, the performances should be negligible, the real impact between both should be battery life related, an early preview done on the Exynos 8890 version claims a 12hrs battery life at maximum brightness on the S7 (not the S7 Edge), I guess we will see how it goes when more reviews come in.
mathieulh said:
To sum things up: the Snapdragon 820 sports a better GPU, the Exynos 8890 sports a better CPU and a better DAC (Qualcomm DACs just haven't got the best of reputations, while the Exynos usually sport a decent Wolfson DAC), Qualcomm SOCs however usually sport a better baseband/radio than the competition.
I would say, in daily usages, the performances should be negligible, the real impact between both should be battery life related, an early preview done on the Exynos 8890 version claims a 12hrs battery life at maximum brightness on the S7 (not the S7 Edge), I guess we will see how it goes when more reviews come in.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No Wolfson this time. It seems Samsung is using an in-house DAC.
http://www.sammobile.com/2016/02/22...ony-imx260-camera-sensor-in-house-audio-chip/
Sent from my MI 3W using Tapatalk
skivnit said:
Seriously ? Do you even know how ios and android operate ?
Sent from my SM-G925F
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.And its irrelevant.that test is cross platform
s3ns3lol said:
Yes.And its irrelevant.that test is cross platform
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No you dont get it. Android uses multi cores to the fullest thats why multi core performance is the thing to look at, i suggest u read a piece on the subject on Anandtech
Sent from my SM-G925F
another benchmark between sd 820 and 8890:
www.anandtech.com/show/10075/early-exynos-8890-impressions
i hope the 4 core difference between the two doesn't mean worse performance on the sd 820 variant. Also if you in the EU you will -apparently- be getting the exynos variant :crying:
i also read somewhere that said that the sd 820 had 2x custom (kyro) a-72 cores and 2x custom (kyro) a-53 cores and not 4x cutom (kyro) a-72 cores, hope its not true.
s3ns3lol said:
Yes.And its irrelevant.that test is cross platform
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quoted from the comments of the article at AnandTech linked above:
It seems perfectly competitive in the graphics benchmarks, and comparing JavaScript benchmarks across different hardware, OS, and browser configurations is useless. To say Apple's Safari team "aggressively optimizes" for Octane and Kraken would be an understatement. Plus we're talking about simple benchmarks that can barely make any use of a second processor core, so of course they make the A9's dual-core CPU design look good next to more parallel competitors. Run something like Geekbench MT or the 3DMark physics test and watch A9 lose out to even Exynos 7420 or SD 810.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
overlordofdoom1 said:
another benchmark between sd 820 and 8890:
www.anandtech.com/show/10075/early-exynos-8890-impressions
i hope the 4 core difference between the two doesn't mean worse performance on the sd 820 variant. Also if you in the EU you will -apparently- be getting the exynos variant :crying:
i also read somewhere that said that the sd 820 had 2x custom (kyro) a-72 cores and 2x custom (kyro) a-53 cores and not 4x cutom (kyro) a-72 cores, hope its not true.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The s820 has two custom cores and two lower-clocked A53s. It really won't matter that it has two fewer larger cores, as more cores leads to more heat, and more heat to more throttling. Only in benchmarks will it be noticeable.
Toss3 said:
The s820 has two custom cores and two lower-clocked A53s.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where did you find that the 2 lower clocked are indeed A53s? What I have read, SD820 has 2 high clocked 2.15GHz and 2 low clocked 1.59GHz "Kryo cores"? So those 2 downclocked Kryo cores should be A72 like power not A53?
SAVVAS. said:
Where did you find that the 2 lower clocked are indeed A53s? What I have read, SD820 has 2 high clocked 2.15GHz and 2 low clocked 1.59GHz "Kryo cores"? So those 2 downclocked Kryo cores should be A72 like power not A53?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm not sure, but pretty sure they aren't the same cores as the faster ones, as that way they could just have clocked them higher, and have them downclock instead of having them at 1.59Ghz all the time.
GFX Bench battery and throttling test of exynos variant. From 2800 frames to 1400 in 10 minutes of load. http://4pda.ru/forum/index.php?s=&showtopic=707315&view=findpost&p=47363269
If some1 find snapdragon s7 results, please post it here.
TANKRED_ENDURES said:
GFX Bench battery and throttling test of exynos variant. From 2800 frames to 1400 in 10 minutes of load. http://4pda.ru/forum/index.php?s=&showtopic=707315&view=findpost&p=47363269
If some1 find snapdragon s7 results, please post it here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ouch i think for sd820 we have to wait a bit since its us and China only
Sent from my SM-G925F
TANKRED_ENDURES said:
GFX Bench battery and throttling test of exynos variant. From 2800 frames to 1400 in 10 minutes of load. http://4pda.ru/forum/index.php?s=&showtopic=707315&view=findpost&p=47363269
If some1 find snapdragon s7 results, please post it here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Says the test ran for 220 minutes. EDIT: Okey that was the results of the battery-test. But still where did you get 10 minutes from? If you look at the graphs you can clearly see that it dips only once to 1400 and that was at about the 1200 second mark (20 minutes).
http://www.talkandroid.com/286767-vivo-xplay-5-gets-benchmarked-on-antutu/#more-286767
Vivo Xplay 5 scored around 160k on Antutu and that is with the Snapdragon 820. Think Samsung should have stuck with Qualcomm for all regions this time around. Wish we could get the sd-version here in Europe as well.
Toss3 said:
http://www.talkandroid.com/286767-vivo-xplay-5-gets-benchmarked-on-antutu/#more-286767
Vivo Xplay 5 scored around 160k on Antutu and that is with the Snapdragon 820. Think Samsung should have stuck with Qualcomm for all regions this time around. Wish we could get the sd-version here in Europe as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its probably fake as most of the score comes from GPU which is impossible and then theres 1080p vs qhd screen question
Sent from my SM-G925F
Throttling looks much better compared to 7420.
They have made GPU wider and lower frequency, also better manufacturin process. Bound to get better compared to 7420.
---------- Post added at 12:02 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:01 AM ----------
skivnit said:
Its probably fake as most of the score comes from GPU which is impossible and then theres 1080p vs qhd screen question
Sent from my SM-G925F
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, in latest version of Antutu it gives more priority to onscreen numbers and single core performance. That's why iPhones are at top of chain in Antutu
Hi,
After the last update (android 6.0.1) has greatly increased performance GPU (mali t628 mp6) , Why? It is even better than Adreno 330.
Bro...what r u asking...i cant get u
G900h has exynos and is the better phone performance wise what are you asking though
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
[email protected] said:
G900h has exynos and is the better phone performance wise what are you asking though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It isn't. The GPU adreno 330 is 60% faster then the one in exynos version.
htb2050 said:
It isn't. The GPU adreno 330 is 60% faster then the one in exynos version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's not true. After the last update (android 6.0.1) increased performance GPU. Just look at the results GFXbench. Now are the same as adreno 330 or better.
kubussz said:
it's not true. After the last update (android 6.0.1) increased performance GPU. Just look at the results GFXbench. Now are the same as adreno 330 or better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No they aren't. Drivers don't increase hardware performance. You can't say that a chip from 2 years ago could be made to run as fast as one released today.
htb2050 said:
No they aren't. Drivers don't increase hardware performance. You can't say that a chip from 2 years ago could be made to run as fast as one released today.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not compare mali t628 to today chip, only for adreno 330. The fact is that the update (android 6.0.1) performance increased. On android(kitkat) were much lower scores in GFXbeanch. I have galaxy s5 900H and it is checked.
kubussz said:
I do not compare mali t628 to today chip, only for adreno 330. The fact is that the update (android 6.0.1) performance increased. On android(kitkat) were much lower scores in GFXbeanch. I have galaxy s5 900H and it is checked.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe you didn't understand. Adreno 330 is faster because of hardware, not because of software. Mali is lower because its hardware is inferior to 330. Those are physical facts that can't be changed by anyone.
htb2050 said:
Maybe you didn't understand. Adreno 330 is faster because of hardware, not because of software. Mali is lower because its hardware is inferior to 330. Those are physical facts that can't be changed by anyone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GFXbench results testify to something else. These are the facts, you can check!
I do not understand how to better hardware? if the results (GFXbench) tell a different story