Related
Hi i have found galaxy S3! here are the details:
CPU: Exynos 4212 1.4Ghz (my note has Exynos 4210)
Memory: 1GB RAM
Screen Size: 4.7inches
Resolution: 1280x720
Camera: front camera 2MP and Rear camera 12MP
System: Android OS 4.0
Name: (of course) Galaxy S III
here are the details of the mobile with the pics as i saw them on the antutu benchmark results while i was checking my Note's results.
how is it slower than the S2..
Lol you mean to say once we get official ICS on Note our phablet will be on top of the table with S3
DaRkMyk said:
how is it slower than the S2..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
man look at the last screen shot. it THE FASTEST!!! and F*** S2 my note beats that!
sangalaviral said:
Lol you mean to say once we get official ICS on Note our phablet will be on top of the table with S3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no i dont think thats gonna happen but yeah note will retain the third position (at least on antutu lol )
aami.aami said:
Hi i have found galaxy S3! here are the details:
CPU: Exynos 4212 1.4Ghz (my note has Exynos 4210)
Memory: 1GB RAM
Screen Size: 4.7inches
Resolution: 1280x720
Camera: front camera 2MP and Rear camera 12MP
System: Android OS 4.0
Name: (of course) Galaxy S III
here are the details of the mobile with the pics as i saw them on the antutu benchmark results while i was checking my Note's results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow - seems a lot of gullible fools actually fell for that one. What a load of BS.
aami.aami said:
Hi i have found galaxy S3! here are the details:
CPU: Exynos 4212 1.4Ghz (my note has Exynos 4210)
Memory: 1GB RAM
Screen Size: 4.7inches
Resolution: 1280x720
Camera: front camera 2MP and Rear camera 12MP
System: Android OS 4.0
Name: (of course) Galaxy S III
here are the details of the mobile with the pics as i saw them on the antutu benchmark results while i was checking my Note's results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
emmm exynos 4212 has 1.5ghz and it is fake for sure, how quad core cpu can be slower then galaxy s2 with dual core 1.2ghz? no logic
Lol.. I think u all looking at the wrong pic..
The first pic is for his device..
Last pic is the galaxy s3 that show score higher than asus prime...
nameejokerx said:
Lol.. I think u all looking at the wrong pic..
The first pic is for his device..
Last pic is the galaxy s3 that show score higher than asus prime...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So why the hell did he post the first pic if he doesn't have the s3? Just confuses everyone and noone gives a crap about his score.
Sent from my superior GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Zamboney said:
So why the hell did he post the first pic if he doesn't have the s3? Just confuses everyone and noone gives a crap about his score.
Sent from my superior GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe want to show how he get that score
But still no individual score on antutu for s3.
Hope the note2 will dominate and use new 5xxx exynos with new mali gpu..
Saw new game with tegra3 and totally a whole lot new improvement..
Something very wrong...It shows Exynos 4212 and not 4412. 4212 is a dual core SoC, not quad-core.
http://www.samsung.com/global/business/semiconductor/minisite/Exynos/news_10.html
Photoshop! What a loser
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
This is OFFICIAL "Exynos" web site !
So if you will go to the products you will see:
Exynos 3 single 1Gz (Galaxy S, Nexus S.)
Exynos 4 dual 45nm 1.2-1.4Ghz (Meizu MX, SGSII , G-Note)
Exynos 4 dual 32nm 1.5Ghz (???)
Exynos 5 dual 2Ghz (???)
So I will get mad if SGSIII will be dual-core A15
These are the "supposed" S3 photos leaked from Taiwan NCC (the FCC equivalent in the US).
http://imgur.com/3uYjk
http://imgur.com/5NRlH
http://imgur.com/G3g99
http://imgur.com/T0sCa
Samsung had already announced officially that the GSIII will have the Exynos 4 quad core 4412.
http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/...exynos-4-quad-as-basis-for-galaxy-s3/?m=false
Sent from my GT-N7000 Samsung Galaxy Note "Go big or go home" using XDA app
sutekidane said:
These are the "supposed" S3 photos leaked from Taiwan NCC (the FCC equivalent in the US).
http://imgur.com/3uYjk
http://imgur.com/5NRlH
http://imgur.com/G3g99
http://imgur.com/T0sCa
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats just Ugg lee !!!
Oha, bettEr stay with gnote
send with GT-N7000 n Tapatalk
DOGSofDOOM said:
Photoshop! What a loser
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its not photoshop.
run antutu, go into the bar charts. the galaxy s3 shows up there.
looks like samsung let the cat out of the bag.
edit: on mine it doesnt say 4212. it says 4x12, i'll upload the pics.
That's a major disappointment if those pics are true. The supposed ones from the ad agency were beautiful but this feels cheap.
Sent from my superior GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
okie, i've attached the pics i see with my phone.
exynos 4x12 processor. screen res 1280x720. im assuming the camera thing is bugged, but it should be 2mp and 12mp.
edit: theres a pic of the s3 on there. dunno if its real or not, but its there. for some reason, it only shows the s3 in the list chart, and not in the bar chart. this means that we cant see whether or not the performance improvement over the asus transformer prime is because of the CPU optimisations or GPU.
edit 2: although this is not the exact way of determining the score, i've done a rough estimate of what the s3 scores based on the list view.
for my galaxy note, i score 6522 points in antutu, which roughly lines up with the galaxy note standard in the antutu bench. so if i count the amount of pixels in my bar using mspaint (line up the end of the bar with the edge of the work area and point my mouse at the end of the bar while zoomed in), i get 216 pixels.
so 6522 points / 216 pixels = 30.19444444 points per pixel.
now if you measure the length of the the galaxy s3 bar, its 402 pixels.
30.1944444 points per pixel = 12138.166666 points as the rough score for the galaxy s3 (give or take 30 points per pixel). thats pure awesome!
The Samsung Galaxy S4 LTE-A edition with the Snapdragon
800 chip inside is understandable getting the attention of
all benchmark-loving geeks. The smartphone was already
put through its paces in a couple of benchmarks last week,
but today, another batch of benchmarks has surfaced
showing what the Adreno 320 GPU is capable of.
The benchmarks that were used are GFX Bench 2.7, Epic
Citadel, AnTuTu 3D, and 3DMark benchmark, The Wi-Fi
adapter in the phone was put through some testing as well
to see if supports higher speeds than its Snapdragon 600
and Octa variations.
But now onto the benchmark scores, which were provided as
screenshots of chart tables. However, we’ve converted them
to our trusty benchmark graphs.
Starting off with the AnTuTu 3D Rating benchmark, the
Samsung Galaxy S4 LTE-A is the definite winner among
Android smartphones, but is far behind the iPhone 5, which
scores north of 13000 points. That’s unsurprising though, as
the first run is of the actual resolution of the respective
smartphone. Since the iPhone 5′s resolution is much lower
than the one of the Galaxy S4, it’s normal for Apple’s
smartphone to take that one.
Higher is better
Sort by Label Sort by Value
13671 Apple iPhone 5
9465 Samsung Galaxy S4 (LTE-A)
7587 Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
6984 Vega IRON
5929 Nexus 4
5632 LG Optimus G
1661 LG Optimus 4X HD
However, when it comes to offscreen benchmarking, the
Adreno 320 takes the lead of the iPhone 5, but still loses
to the Octa version of the Galaxy S4.
Higher is better
Sort by Label Sort by Value
2781 Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
2658 Samsung Galaxy S4 (LTE-A)
2564 Apple iPhone 5
2366 Samsung Galaxy Note II
6984 Vega IRON
2084 Vega N6
2062 Samsung Galaxy S3
2036 Vega R3
1974 HTC One X+
Moving onto the 3DMark benchmark test, the Galaxy S4 is
on top with 17075 points for the graphics score on the
“Icestorm Detail” level.
Higher is better
Sort by Label Sort by Value
17075 Samsung Galaxy S4 (LTE-A)
12628 Vega IRON
10647 Samsung Galaxy S4 (LTE-A)
11439 Google Nexus 4
9400 LG Optimus G PRO
Lastly, there’s Epic Citadel. There, the Galaxy S4 LTE-A falls
behind the Galaxy S4 Octa yet again, but it’s more to do
with the fact that the benchmark runs onscreen and the
devices hit the 60 fps limit of their displays.
High er is better
Sort by Label Sort by Value
59 . 8 Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
59 . 2 Samsung Galaxy S4 (LTE-A)
57 . 5 Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
57 . 1 Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
56 . 4 HTC One
55 . 6 Sony Xperia Z
54 . 2 LG Optimus G Pro
53 . 9 Nexus 4
53 . 4 Asus Padfone 2
52 . 6 LG Optimus G
41 . 3 Samsung Galaxy S III
38 . 6 Oppo Find 5
And finally, we get on to the Wi-Fi Bandwidth test. The
Galaxy S4 LTE-A sits on top scoring 80392 points on the
5GHz band and 46411 on the 2.4GHz band. The Octa core
variety gets 76739 points and 45492 points on the 5GHz
and 2.4GHz band, respectively.
http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-galaxy-s4-lte-a-with-snapdragon-800-gets-gpu-benchmark-action/
Hi you stated twice Galaxy S4 LTE A witch ones octa ? Thanks
Moving onto the 3DMark benchmark test, the Galaxy S4 is
on top with 17075 points for the graphics score on the
“Icestorm Detail” level.
Higher is better
Sort by Label Sort by Value
17075 Samsung Galaxy S4 (LTE-A)
12628 Vega IRON
10647 Samsung Galaxy S4 (LTE-A)
11439 Google Nexus 4
9400 LG Optimus G PRO
wheres the default normal I9505 (Snapdragon 600) scores?
Quoted from GSM arena
"As you can clearly see, the Snapdragon 800 wipes the floor with both the*Samsung Galaxy S4 Exynos 5 Octa*andGalaxy S4 Snapdragon 600. In AnTuTu the difference between the scores is 3701 points, or just over 14% while in Quadrant it's more substantial at nearly 50%. Owners of the Octa and Snapdragon 600 versions of the phone*might feel a bit off*at this point"
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda premium
plasmastate said:
Quoted from GSM arena
"As you can clearly see, the Snapdragon 800 wipes the floor with both the*Samsung Galaxy S4 Exynos 5 Octa*andGalaxy S4 Snapdragon 600. In AnTuTu the difference between the scores is 3701 points, or just over 14% while in Quadrant it's more substantial at nearly 50%. Owners of the Octa and Snapdragon 600 versions of the phone*might feel a bit off*at this point"
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why? Because an updated phone has a higher GPU score in a benchmark that won't be seen in everyday use throughout the entire lifetime of any of the three phones? Er....no. I'm happy with my GS4 and that isn't going to change because an updated model has been released two months after I purchased it.
Some people really need to get a grip and break this stupid obsession with benchmark scores. Once you get beyond a certain score they're nothing but numbers.
Who cares anyway about benchmarks, they dont mean anything. there is also no single game that demands such a gpu power. yeah cool within 2 years maybe but then ill have the S6
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app
plasmastate said:
Quoted from GSM arena
"As you can clearly see, the Snapdragon 800 wipes the floor with both the*Samsung Galaxy S4 Exynos 5 Octa*andGalaxy S4 Snapdragon 600. In AnTuTu the difference between the scores is 3701 points, or just over 14% while in Quadrant it's more substantial at nearly 50%. Owners of the Octa and Snapdragon 600 versions of the phone*might feel a bit off*at this point"
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't agree with that, i used a galaxy s3 and compared to the i9505 it is so much faster. Why should people feel a bit off just because a updated phone is out ? technique is changing everyday and not everyone cares about the newest stuff that got released. We already knew Samsung would release a updated version somewhere in the summer, people had a choice.
Hello do you know the price of the s4 LTE.A
Its about $900. For that our snap600 its better... :beer:
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app
We all can try our best to justify our purchase of i9500 and i9505 but nothing can change the fact that the lteA variant is faster, battery efficient, has quick charge like s600, has low power voice command for wakeup, has significantly better gpu, native 4k playback, 4k video recording etc.
But we have to keep in mind that all this won't make our s4 any worse or better, it is still running the way it was.
The only thing I am disappointed with is the octacores poor optimisation and a half baked silicon for big.little. I dont care if the snap 800 is faster or not but the octacore has alot of potential. Only if it was optimized better!
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda premium
plasmastate said:
We all can try our best to justify our purchase of i9500 and i9505 but nothing can change the fact that the lteA variant is faster, battery efficient, has quick charge like s600, has low power voice command for wakeup, has significantly better gpu, native 4k playback, 4k video recording etc.
But we have to keep in mind that all this won't make our s4 any worse or better, it is still running the way it was.
The only thing I am disappointed with is the octacores poor optimisation and a half baked silicon for big.little. I dont care if the snap 800 is faster or not but the octacore has alot of potential. Only if it was optimized better!
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't have any of the bolded parts. The only thing is better at is the GPU power and efficiency. That's all.
Don't forget that it costs about 100$ to 150$ more than the regular S4 so even if I have the option to peek the LTE-A variant 1.5 months ago I wouldn't cause it doesn't deserve the 100$ difference.
Guys I'm considering buying a s4-lte
But how's the ROM support
Are the ROMs for the snapdragon 600 comlaitable with it
Slm.Alsini said:
Guys I'm considering buying a s4-lte
But how's the ROM support
Are the ROMs for the snapdragon 600 comlaitable with it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe, not much I think. And NO, the Snapdragon 600 and 800 are totally different. It might brick if you flash a S600 ROM on the phone.
Sent from my Galaxy S4 i9500
noideaforusername said:
It doesn't have any of the bolded parts. The only thing is better at is the GPU power and efficiency. That's all.
Don't forget that it costs about 100$ to 150$ more than the regular S4 so even if I have the option to peek the LTE-A variant 1.5 months ago I wouldn't cause it doesn't deserve the 100$ difference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're incorrect. The chipset in the GS4 LTE-A does support 4k encode/decode. The MSM8974 is the first hardware from Qualcomm that supports that feature. Whether or not Samsung will enable it is another question but I am betting they will eventually through a software update.
racerex said:
You're incorrect. The chipset in the GS4 LTE-A does support 4k encode/decode. The MSM8974 is the first hardware from Qualcomm that supports that feature. Whether or not Samsung will enable it is another question but I am betting they will eventually through a software update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never said the chipset doesn't support it. Just the fact that it won't be used since the camera sensor doesn't support this.
noideaforusername said:
Never said the chipset doesn't support it. Just the fact that it won't be used since the camera sensor doesn't support this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
May be the camera sensor wont support it but how about outputting the 4k encoded video files through the video player mate?
thekoRngear said:
May be the camera sensor wont support it but how about outputting the 4k encoded video files through the video player mate?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From where did you get the 4k videos and why would you want to do so? The display is FHD so you could take the FHD version of the Video/Series you want to watch... Don't forget that 4k videos are 4 times the size of a FHD videos so you probably won't be even possibly place 4k video inside your device
If you meant through a 4k TV monitor, then yes it'll be an advantage which very few people will be able to use.
noideaforusername said:
From where did you get the 4k videos and why would you want to do so? The display is FHD so you could take the FHD version of the Video/Series you want to watch... Don't forget that 4k videos are 4 times the size of a FHD videos so you probably won't be even possibly place 4k video inside your device
If you meant through a 4k TV monitor, then yes it'll be an advantage which very few people will be able to use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm. I got Elysium trailer. A 2min video sized 416 or so MB. My S3 has 720p display. But did the technology stop there? The CPU/GPU is capable of rendering a 1080p video via video player. And since snapdragon 800 can decode/output 4k videos the first thing I will be curious (if I had the LTE A) whether or not the S4 LTE A could play that out. I can make it to smaller whatever size (1080p, 720p, 480p, 360p) I want but that isnt my point.
If there is certain restriction that all the current gen 1080p SAMOLED/SLCDs are unable to output UHD contents that I am unaware of, then pardon me for wanting it. 4k videos though really rare till now. People rather watch the 1080p videos Sourced straight from 4k original like Amazing Spider Man.
Also, the making sense of outputting such high resolution stuffs off a comparatively small screen like 5"+1080p could be another question. But since the GPU has it, why not try it?
racerex said:
Whether or not Samsung will enable it is another question but I am betting they will eventually through a software update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Amen to that.
Just tried a 4k video using mxplayer with all possible settings on my i9500 for the sake of fun. It struggles and plays at almost half the normal speed lol. I am curious to find out how the snap800s handle such video.
(Not that it is useful in real time, atleast not for me but yeah)
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda premium
plasmastate said:
Just tried a 4k video using mxplayer with all possible settings on my i9500 for the sake of fun. It struggles and plays at almost half the normal speed lol. I am curious to find out how the snap800s handle such video.
(Not that it is useful in real time, atleast not for me but yeah)
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MX Player uses sw decoder for 4k video playback and unfortunately it uses low power(little) CPUs. My i9500 can't even play 1080p videos correctly by sw decoder in MX player cause of wrong processing priority which is kernel related while nexus4 can handle that without problem
I think A15 CPUs can handle 4k playback with no problems
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk 2
Pagnell said:
Why? Because an updated phone has a higher GPU score in a benchmark that won't be seen in everyday use throughout the entire lifetime of any of the three phones? Er....no. I'm happy with my GS4 and that isn't going to change because an updated model has been released two months after I purchased it.
Some people really need to get a grip and break this stupid obsession with benchmark scores. Once you get beyond a certain score they're nothing but numbers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree , every version of this phone launched have its pros and cons . even in the same hardware field , which is really not noticeable at all in real life use. every version is fast , snappy and can handle 1080p contents just well . just lets hope we get proper optimization for our devices that should be our main worry
im from Israel (Europe) and i need to ask some question ..
i want to buy the I9505 and i dont know if the I9500 is better?
in israel the I9505 is cheaper than I9500. so who is better ?
what i need on my phone is good camera and good battery. im not playing games,only whatsapp, instagram , facebook , listen music and take quality pictures..
in israel the i9505 worth 2370 shakel(NIS) and I9500 worth 2490 .. is it worth to add the 120 shakel to get the I9500 ?
i have now HTC ONE and i didnt like it beacuse of the battery and the camera ! so i want to change it !
I9500 :
- Apparently a Slightly better camera sensor, so better pictures
- GPU does not support OpenGL 3, no issue for any games so far though
I9505 :
- Snapdragon processor, so better dev support, more custom ROM's etc. if you plan to root
- Better GPU than I9500
Battery backup is almost the same on both versions.
Im not plan to change rom
i want the orignal rom
Noticeable difference between cameras? Or both high quality
Im not plan to change rom
i want the orignal rom
Noticeable difference between cameras? Or both high quality
Have a look at the below thread:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2283201
no camera differences....
Really no camera differences to be honest.Indeed the i9500 has a newer model of Camera Sensor but that doesnt mean anything.It's also the camera firmware for the process of the image and if i am right isnt so good on i9500.I vote for the i9505
LG G flex and galaxy s4 even both has 13 MP, 4160 x 3120 pixels, autofocus, LED flash,
As LG G Flex is going to get 4K video recording as part of its Android 4.4 KitKat update.
is it possible to get 4K VIDEO RECORDING ON SAMSUNG GALAXY S4 GT I9505?
i dont think so. not enough horsepower.. i would rather have 720p slow [email protected] or [email protected]
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app
xtrustkillx said:
i dont think so. not enough horsepower.. i would rather have 720p slow [email protected] or [email protected]
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
me too
[ℹ] Some Information about 4k-Recording on the S4
xtrustkillx said:
i dont think so. not enough Horsepower.. i would rather have 720p slow [email protected] or [email protected]
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What you Probably mean is the PROCESSING POWER.
Horsepower (HP)
Pferdestärke (PS) is for Cars, Machines etc.
The S4 and the NOte 3 have both the Same Sensor. (But the Note 3 has 8cm Macro, the S4 6cm, my own eyes 4,1 cm which are 1.6 inches.)
But the programmers of the S4 Camera Firmware (Same Design as Note 3, i
it! :laugh didn't add a 3840x2160-Option because the Processing Power of the S4 isn't enough. But the Sensor would be Fast enough. A bad and quite big disappointment for al S4-Users. But you can Overclock and etc... but that's anoher Story.
See this posts for more
nformation.
This Posi ts quoted somewhere else.
Hannah Stern said:
What you Probably mean is the PROCESSING POWER.
xtrustkillx said:
i dont think so. not enough horsepower..
i would rather have 720p slow [email protected] or [email protected]
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Horsepower (HP)
Pferdestärke (PS) is for Cars, Machines etc.
The S4 and the NOte 3 have both the Same Sensor. (But the Note 3 has 8cm Macro, the S4 6cm, my own eyes 4,1 cm which are 1.6 inches.)
But the programmers of the S4 Camera Firmware (Same Design as Note 3, i
it! :laugh didn't add a 3840x2160-Option because the Processing Power of the S4 isn't enough. But the Sensor would be Fast enough. A bad and quite big disappointment for al S4-Users. But you can Overclock and etc... but that's anoher Story.
See this posts for more
nformation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Note: I Quoted this Post Here.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=56958675#post56958675
Some Information...
Anson A said:
LG G flex and galaxy s4 even both has 13 MP, 4160 x 3120 pixels, autofocus, LED flash,
As LG G Flex is going to get 4K video recording as part of its Android 4.4 KitKat update.
is it possible to get 4K VIDEO RECORDING ON SAMSUNG GALAXY S4 GT I9505?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please see/read this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/search.php?searchid=335688280
xtrustkillx said:
i dont think so. not enough horsepower.. i would rather have 720p slow motion@30fps or [email protected]
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't really take good Slow Motion Videos at such a low Framerate ([email protected]FPS.)
But most smartphones (do) have a worser problem actually:
(The Solution: http://web.archive.org/save/http://...slow-motion-phones-device-how-to-imo-t2998500 )
i9506 4K
Because the GT-i9506 (not i9505) has the SAME PROCESSING POWER as the Note 3 has, you can theoretically actually record 4k Video on it.
i9506 and N9005 - QualCOmm Sanprdagon 800
i9505 Snapdragon S600 (QC 1.9GhZ)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2711239 - Makes 4 Times higher Res on 4k Possible.
But with many Restrictions with Google's BOGUS 4.4.2‼
Sorry because of that.
But however, try it on i9506, not i9505 because it won't work on 09505.
9505 has too low Processing Performance.
I wanted to purchase a new phone under 15000 inr .I have choice between Galaxy S3 neo , Galaxy E5. (S4 from amazon is not available for delivery at my place,so i can't purchase it). s3 neo is available for inr 10500 and e5 for inr 14000 as there is extra 10% off. Suggest which will be best. Please also tell me what are the differnce between between two phones.does e5 have remote control,knox and we can use only one sim at a time in e5 ??
Which one should i buy
Thank You in advance
Diff:
Galaxy E5 vs Galaxy S3 Neo
5.0 inches vs 4.8 inches
Quad core 1.2GHz vs. Quad core 1.4 GHz
No info about graphic vs. Adreno 305
Front camera : 5MP vs 1.9MP
No NFC vs NFC
Radio to be confirmed vs Stereo FM radio
No compass and gyro vs compass and gyro
2400Mah non removable vs 2100Mah removable battery
Rox said:
Diff:
Galaxy E5 vs Galaxy S3 Neo
5.0 inches vs 4.8 inches
Quad core 1.2GHz vs. Quad core 1.4 GHz
No info about graphic vs. Adreno 305
Front camera : 5MP vs 1.9MP
No NFC vs NFC
Radio to be confirmed vs Stereo FM radio
No compass and gyro vs compass and gyro
2400Mah non removable vs 2100Mah removable battery
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Should i go for s3 neo ?
If you want better battery, bigger screen and better front camera go for E5, if you want better cpu, gyro, compass, faster proccessor , NFC, radio go for S3 neo.
IMO Choose s3 neo
Rox said:
If you want better battery, bigger screen and better front camera go for E5, if you want better cpu, gyro, compass, faster proccessor , NFC, radio go for S3 neo.
IMO Choose s3 neo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I want one in which the development is good.
I have not seen any forum of galaxy e5 so far.
In which device there will be more and better roms.
Is there anyone who will port ressurection remix rom for s3neo .
I published sources and everybody is free to compile ROM using them. I dont have time to maintain multiple roms, i am maintaining CM 11,12 and soon 12.1
I dont know how development will be on e5 since that phone just came out, s3 neo is out for long time
Rox said:
If you want better battery, bigger screen and better front camera go for E5, if you want better cpu, gyro, compass, faster proccessor , NFC, radio go for S3 neo.
IMO Choose s3 neo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
S3 neo have better cpu and faster processor than e5 ?
I don't matter bigger screen and little difference in battery .
But i want rear camera to be good . and front to be average.
The only thing i like in e5 is its looks and body
Hey @Rox
I think E5 is better than S3 , U have made some mistakes in ur comparison I will post the exact as I had the S3 Neo and now I have E5 :
E5 : S3 Neo
Snapdragon 410 1.2 Ghz : Snap Dragon 400 1.4 Ghz ( 1.2 in some regions )
5.0 inches : 4.8 Inches
Adreno 306 : Adreno 305
Front Cam : 5.0 MP( Many Features ) : 1.9 MP
Rear : Same Both ( E5 more effects )
NFC : NFC
Stereo Radio : Stereo Radio
I don't know much about sensors but I know s3 neo has more sensors than E5 ( Light , gyro , compass ,etc ... )
Battery :2400 vs 2100
4.4.4 vs 4.4.2
Ultra power Saving : No UPS
WILL GET 5.0 : Not SURE !?!
E5 has MUCH BETTER METAL DESIGN THAN THE S3 NEO : Very thin : 7.3 m , Metal frame : JUST DAMN GOOD !! :victory::victory:
I just suggest E$ :good::good::fingers-crossed:
ofcoarse performance of e5 is better due to new hardware and new software
hey first of all software mobile samsung galaxy e5 is better because it has the latest touchwiz interface mobile s3 neo has old and if it has lots of other features which are very useful
camera of s5 is better
if you want to use dual sim and add a microsd card then you should go for a thing you s3 neo because in e5 1 slot is for sim card and in the other one you can either add a sim card or micro sd card
difference is that s3 neo has notification led while e5 does not have a notification led
click thanks if I helped you