Related
I see many say they are installing the lag fix on the Tab but is it really needed? Can't say I have noticed much lag on my Tab so just wondering what I would gain if I install the lag fix?
Regards,
BTJ
i dont see the need.
It depends on whether you want to show off your Quadrant score or not, really. In all the tests I've done the only measurable impact of installing the lag fix is on the Quadrant IO score (which it increases by about x10).
If you're not interested in the benchmark, I don't think you'll notice any difference at all.
ok, that's what I thought.. Thx..
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA App
No lag here. Quadrant gives a score of about 900-1000.
I don't get it still.
From what I've seen so far, is that the Tab is one of the fastest Android device I've seen, but for some odd reason Quadrant is reporting a very low score. And what's funny is that it's much faster and snappier then my Nexus One (blows it off the water to be exact).
If a lag fix can fix this then it only shows how unreliable Quadrant benchmark is.
Maybe someone can shed some light here.
I installed the fix and I'm getting a 2100+ score in quadrant.
Sent from my SGH-T849 using XDA App
xoltrix2000 said:
only shows how unreliable Quadrant benchmark is.
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant is the worst benchmarking tool ever.
So which is the best benchmarking tool?
2544
2744
2733
2528
2719
are these good scores
Those are ridiculous. The highest I've ever gotten on my rooted dinc is in the 1600s, and that's running at 1.22 ghz
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
Pretty good.
Though, my dell streak overclocked to 1.22ghz would do 2100 quadrant scores
Lol
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
I keep gettin around 2500 and up.. Im lovin this..
Thats funny cause my friend is right here with his quadtant 4 runs 1768 was its best stock my nexus s stock was 1678 and at 1. 4 ghz I'm at 2368
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
nucentury08 said:
Thats funny cause my friend is right here with his quadtant 4 runs 1768 was its best stock my nexus s stock was 1678 and at 1. 4 ghz I'm at 2368
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just got 2813 so... -Fly like a G6-.
Hmm you guys nose must be out the door #Smh
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
I just ran it and got 2481. Only thing I've done is root the phone.
Why am i not surprised that nucentury, who seems to have NO interest in getting the Atrix since it doesn't have a Gyroscope which will apparently be such an improvement for gaming that Crysis might actually run on a phone if it had one, is bragging about random crap again. Or maybe he's not bragging, seeing as my Archos 70 Internet Tablet with a 250GB hard drive running Froyo already got a score of 1,778 in Quadrant running at 1Ghz. Or maybe it's the idea that benchmarks are completely meaningless for the most part.
And if you have to overclock your device and still can't reach the scores of the Atrix.... which as far as i'm aware i don't believe Quadrant has support for multi-core chips yet.... then i don't see what you're bragging about, really.
nucentury08 said:
Thats funny cause my friend is right here with his quadtant 4 runs 1768 was its best stock my nexus s stock was 1678 and at 1. 4 ghz I'm at 2368
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why are you here again? go back to the galaxy S forum so you can all stroke each other's clearly better egos.
oh, and 2544, nothing done but root.
nucentury08 said:
Thats funny cause my friend is right here with his quadtant 4 runs 1768 was its best stock my nexus s stock was 1678 and at 1. 4 ghz I'm at 2368
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro you have been trolling legit every Atrix topic. Stop.
Quadrant Speeds
I have a Samsung Captivate. Just went through warranty exchange as I got one right after release and had been battling shutdown issues. After rooting and applying lag fix I now get between 2000 - 2200. I just ran it and got 2248, which is on the high end of what i usually get.
I wish I would have waited on the Atrix. Have fun with your new hardware dudes.
completely stock lowest was 2487 highest 2691
I personally think the more important question is......does the phone run smoothly?
sturgeon123456 said:
I personally think the more important question is......does the phone run smoothly?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine surely does so far. I've run Quadrant a few times and got just under 2800. Hell, I got 2300 while playing music in the background.
sturgeon123456 said:
I personally think the more important question is......does the phone run smoothly?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it does. With my old Captivate, when I went to add a shortcut to my homescreen, when I hit the applications button it would take like 10 seconds to load up the next screen with my apps list. And I had mine overclocked to 1.28ghz and all that jazz. This one opens it straight away. No waiting for anything to load.
What are the neocore benchmarks at? That's a pretty cool program to test the phones gaming ability. I'm not getting an atrix because I like my iPhone but I used to use android phones. Just curious about the phones performance.
ApplCobbler said:
Yes, it does. With my old Captivate, when I went to add a shortcut to my homescreen, when I hit the applications button it would take like 10 seconds to load up the next screen with my apps list. And I had mine overclocked to 1.28ghz and all that jazz. This one opens it straight away. No waiting for anything to load.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I am using a galaxy s captivate and I like it, I cant wait till I can get my paws on the atrix!
leadguy68 said:
Pretty good.
Though, my dell streak overclocked to 1.22ghz would do 2100 quadrant scores
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apples and oranges...
The Streak is 800x480, as are most high-end large sceen Android phones, and the Atrix is pushing 35% more pixels @ 960x540, and STILL getting higher scores...
Plus, add in what others have mentioned that Quadrant is not multi-core capable, and you start to realize how much power is under the hood of this thing!
AnTuTu Benchmark from cm-10.1-20130908-NIGHTLY
Antutu score on stock.
Ye I also don't understand how I got that.
My scores usually hover between 19500 and 20500 though.
I added stock scores so people could have a reference atleast.
Sent from my GT-I9190 using xda app-developers app
My benchmarks: CM10.1-20130915-Nightly
Antutu: 20492
Quadrant: 5948
-----------------
Antutu
Quadrant
Sent from my GT-I9195 using xda premium
Thats odd. Mine turned out much lower than usual:
I read the other day that Samsung use higher clock speeds with benchmark apps, higher than the phone runs normally, which in my eyes means benchmarks on these phones means jack squat! I was going to buy the S4 Mini but because of this I have lost faith in Samsung and have just ordered the HTC Mini. Will post the link when I get back home with what I read.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
rofl. If you would read more about this topic, you would find out, that samsung isn't the only one doing this. But I don't see the problem, because first of all I don't really care about benchmarks and secondly I think the purpose of a benchmark is to test the phone on the highest settings.
BamRom 4.3.1
Sent from my GT-I9195 using xda app-developers app
junkyde said:
rofl. If you would read more about this topic, you would find out, that samsung isn't the only one doing this. But I don't see the problem, because first of all I don't really care about benchmarks and secondly I think the purpose of a benchmark is to test the phone on the highest settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe others do, but its not right. I use benchmarks when purchasing a phone, so do some others and companies know this, why else would they ramp up scores? And fine if they want to show off their highest settings, but not if these high settings dont actually run for more than 10 minutes before frying your phone. These aren't real world stats which is what they should be showing. I mean who are these high settings benchmarks ment to be for if not everyday users? Personally I think its a scam and ANY company that goes by these rules is shameful...
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
RuffBuster said:
Maybe others do, but its not right. I use benchmarks when purchasing a phone, so do some others and companies know this, why else would they ramp up scores? And fine if they want to show off their highest settings, but not if these high settings dont actually run for more than 10 minutes before frying your phone. These aren't real world stats which is what they should be showing. I mean who are these high settings benchmarks ment to be for if not everyday users? Personally I think its a scam and ANY company that goes by these rules is shameful...
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't really understand this whine about specific settings on benchmarks?! People who want the highest score disable everything, use the highest settings, overclock, use fresh install, delete all useless apps etc. Clearly these newbie phone benchmarkers have never done pc benchmarks. And if someone buys a phone because of it's benchmark score then clearly those don't have any idea about real life usage vs benchmarking.
leripe said:
I can't really understand this whine about specific settings on benchmarks?! People who want the highest score disable everything, use the highest settings, overclock, use fresh install, delete all useless apps etc. Clearly these newbie phone benchmarkers have never done pc benchmarks. And if someone buys a phone because of it's benchmark score then clearly those don't have any idea about real life usage vs benchmarking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I myself have done many benchmarks both on PC and mobile phones and I myself use the scores I get and compare it against it's physical aspects. Everyone has their own way of buying a phone and you can't judge people for the way they do stuff.
RuffBuster said:
I read the other day that Samsung use higher clock speeds with benchmark apps, higher than the phone runs normally, which in my eyes means benchmarks on these phones means jack squat! I was going to buy the S4 Mini but because of this I have lost faith in Samsung and have just ordered the HTC Mini. Will post the link when I get back home with what I read.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A benchmark is not a good reason to buy a phone, I think you are a fanboy trolling
features man that's the real deal, battery life, network, camera, memory, screen, style construction, etc.
not only a benchmark if you want the best bench score buy the full one not the mini
Sent from my GT-I9192 using Tapatalk
Benchmarks mean something to me as well. They aren't guidelines to what phone I should choose, but the specifics can give me a good judgement for the aspect I'm intending to improve when upgrading my phone. I had an s3 mini before this and was disappointed by battery life versus performance. I could tell the difference by taking multiple benchmarks at different times during everyday use. I noticed when phones/ROMs have widely varying benchmarks then the battery life and performance would dwindle. The s3 mini on most ROMs would vary by approx 2000 points, and that's a lot.
It's worth noting that a custom ROM can affect the stability of a phones functioning a lot, but it is mostly due to the hardware used when a phone/computer has dwindling performance. The s4 mini for me, has had fairly stable performance and shows it with the battery life. My scores vary between approx 19800 and 20800 with moderate use.
Sent from the dark side of the moon.
Results with @proxuser's kernel:
Azariah Vidya said:
Results with @proxuser's kernel:
View attachment 2340182
View attachment 2340183
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i get 21620 with oc 2ghz
Good!
Using Antutu for benchmarks on Samsung devices
You should not use Antutu to benchmark Samsung devices because they are unreliable as the stock ROM will score higher no matter what so if you want real benchmark results then use another program.
Using
cm - 10 . 2 - 20131018 -NIGHTLY - serrano 3 gxx after 30 sec reboot and limiting background processes to
2.
Result: 21140
Sent from my GT-I9190 using xda app-developers app
Anyone yet tested OpenGL ES 3.0 on Antutu, what kind of scores are you getting
Mine: 3816
Sent from my GT-I9190 using xda app-developers app
View attachment 2348641
always aoperal
very good bencmarks, my mini duos is arriving, :laugh:
Here is screenshots of over clocked serrano-x kernel. It's still not stable but I can run 2ghz without reboots.
Sent from my GT-I9195 using xda premium
Hello all!
Strange "issue" - i don't know if this is an issue but yeah - i installed the KITKAT release that appeared about 20 hrs ago on the google website...
Now - Antutu score has dropped a lot!
Before 4.4, i hat stock 4.3 - 19000 score and last AOKP with franco kernel - 20600
NOW - with 4.4 it has dropped to 14639 !!!!!!!
kreindler said:
Hello all!
Strange "issue" - i don't know if this is an issue but yeah - i installed the KITKAT release that appeared about 20 hrs ago on the google website...
Now - Antutu score has dropped a lot!
Before 4.4, i hat stock 4.3 - 19000 score and last AOKP with franco kernel - 20600
NOW - with 4.4 it has dropped to 14639 !!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait antutu gets compatible with 4.4 kikat
Karo. said:
Wait antutu gets compatible with 4.4 kikat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
already is, while i was on n5 port i got 16k witch is standard for stock, that 14k just confirm what i said in other threads, 4.4 is more laggy than 4.3(not laggy like it lags a lot, but sometimes u see some little lags where u dont see on 4.3)
1. Antutu has changed a lot since even 4.3.. Separate dalvik tests etc.. Scores may have changed
2. Google phone software always comes unoptimised.. No krait/bionic optimisation and also with dog slow dalvik/Java libraries.
Kernel and rom devs should have normal performance resumed shortly.. Hopefully.
meangreenie said:
1. Antutu has changed a lot since even 4.3.. Separate dalvik tests etc.. Scores may have changed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not a valid argument - i've done all the tests today and yesterday- same antutu version
Furthermore- has anyone made similar before/after tests with other benchmark programs??
I dont know if it's placebo, but 4.4 seems at least that buttery as 4.3 to me....
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Don't go on what antutu says it's the worsts bench mark use geek bench for CPU and gfx bench for gpu
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
THEBANDIT420 said:
Don't go on what antutu says it's the worsts bench mark use geek bench for CPU and gfx bench for gpu
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
now why do you say that antutu is the worst? in reality, they are both just as bad. yes, geek bench is just as inaccurate.
So, do these results indicate any sort of actual real life increase or decrease in performance?
I apologise just would like for someone to clear this up for me.
No. It is well known that bench marks mean nothing. They are easily fooled into giving higher scores with laggier performance
Wayne Tech Nexus
yes and no.... benchmarks are irrelevant to a certain point. But overall - they offer a view on the performance - an s2 will get a lower score as an s3, or a nexus 4.. and that with cheating on benchmarks, i think the only one that was found was samsung... one more reason 4 me to hate them and their recycled plastic products
kreindler said:
yes and no.... benchmarks are irrelevant to a certain point. But overall - they offer a view on the performance - an s2 will get a lower score as an s3, or a nexus 4.. and that with cheating on benchmarks, i think the only one that was found was samsung... one more reason 4 me to hate them and their recycled plastic products
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should be aware that the phone underclocks when reaches a certain temperature. Keep that in mind and re-do your benchmark. Put your phone somewhere cold, like granite, wait some minutes and do your benchmark.
Me too its just 15k in antutu.. And im getting some lags in games like FIFA 14 and a good battery drain it drains 7-10% in one night without use.
opssemnik said:
already is, while i was on n5 port i got 16k witch is standard for stock, that 14k just confirm what i said in other threads, 4.4 is more laggy than 4.3(not laggy like it lags a lot, but sometimes u see some little lags where u dont see on 4.3)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed! Felt the same when i started using.
Any issues yet?
The only issue im having is that when i increase the volume while playing music and try to slide the volume bar on the screen, it doesnt work.
EDIT: Runnin butter smooth after 2 restarts since the rom installation.
Just got 17,915 Antutu on stock 4.4, tested in performance mode. Seems normal to me; bring on the bionic and dalvik enhancements.
kreindler said:
Hello all!
Strange "issue" - i don't know if this is an issue but yeah - i installed the KITKAT release that appeared about 20 hrs ago on the google website...
Now - Antutu score has dropped a lot!
Before 4.4, i hat stock 4.3 - 19000 score and last AOKP with franco kernel - 20600
NOW - with 4.4 it has dropped to 14639 !!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i tried antutu and got over 15k i will try again with ART
Flashed purity now... Will do antutu benchmark tomorrow! Fingers crossed)
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
kreindler said:
Hello all!
Strange "issue" - i don't know if this is an issue but yeah - i installed the KITKAT release that appeared about 20 hrs ago on the google website...
Now - Antutu score has dropped a lot!
Before 4.4, i hat stock 4.3 - 19000 score and last AOKP with franco kernel - 20600
NOW - with 4.4 it has dropped to 14639 !!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Although i am new to nexus 4, ye i upgraded from nexus one just 1 week ago (nexus one lasted almost 4 years, what a dog !) i do have to say the kitkat update has made a significant negative impact in 3d games/applications.
The performance drop is obvious on say, minion rush. As i am a gamer in PCs for many years, since 1986, and a tv control news expert , i can easily feel the frames being near 25 and i can even tell if frames are down to 20 10 or 5.
I am pretty certain the frames in Minion Rush for example (heavier game i have atm in n4) have dropped at least 30% and i am pretty sure they were not way above 25 before kitkat. I estimate 10-15 fps max
Hello everyone, I just recently updated my note 4 N910C to lollipop, and I Tested it to see its benchmark score on Antitumor, but I'm really disappointed to see that it scored a total of 38738. Its even low than galaxy s5. Whats wrong?
mujikhalid said:
Hello everyone, I just recently updated my note 4 N910C to lollipop, and I Tested it to see its benchmark score on Antitumor, but I'm really disappointed to see that it scored a total of 38738. Its even low than galaxy s5. Whats wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does your device perform slow?No?Why the **** do you care about useless benchmarks....your device got a lower score than the S5 so what?Numbers don't equal performance...try doing a ful wipe if you already didn't...
There are already threads about this and you don''t care to search the forum before posting the same thread?
Woah dude, chill , dont be so pissed if you got to see a same thread on the forum lol
mujikhalid said:
Woah dude, chill , dont be so pissed if you got to see a same thread on the forum lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah..I'm not pissed lol...sorry if I sounded like that it's just that those benchmarks are useless.Judge the device by the way you see how it performs in everyday use not by a number you got from a benchmark app...and also as I mentioned there are already threads about this so use the search function
Your note 4 shipped with 4.4. Its built for 4.4. Use 4.4
The rampant lust for updates, and the subsequent disappointment that follows is draining
dannstarr said:
Your note 4 shipped with 4.4. Its built for 4.4. Use 4.4
The rampant lust for updates, and the subsequent disappointment that follows is draining
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have any problem with the 5.0.1 in Note 4. I'm coming from Galaxy S5 and there is no way the Note 4 is performing worse than the S5. Its way faster.
I agree that benchmark points is useless and says little about the performance of the device.
Man i have the same problem here it seems that the phone is always in power saving mode and the gpu is limited to 350 mhz instead of 700 mhz. Also the cpu runs at 1.3 ghz instead of 1.9 for the big cores thats why it has low score in antutu hope somebody figures out a solution and also this is a bug in this update
Sent from my SM-N910H using XDA Free mobile app
meh
You guys are just being paranoid, I even noticed that it got faster after the lollipop update, I would never care for benchmark numbers as long as I am satisfied with the performance in real world, benchmarks can be influenced by many factors and I barely trust them (and ofc I am talking about Android benchmarks)
Edit: I just tried running a benchmark in Antutu and got 37940, ran it again and guess what? I got 44304, how can I trust this? LOL (I knew it would be way different from a benchmark to another, as it used to happen with me on my old HTC One X, since then I never trust these benchmarks). Just enjoy your phone and stop looking for non-existent problems.
mujikhalid said:
Hello everyone, I just recently updated my note 4 N910C to lollipop, and I Tested it to see its benchmark score on Antitumor, but I'm really disappointed to see that it scored a total of 38738. Its even low than galaxy s5. Whats wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many places in xda I read about this antutu score, i want to know what will i get if my phone get 100000 score?we can win any price?
Thanks
its a bug
enable power saving mode and turn off cpu limit then turn off power saving mode back
go to developer option and reduce the animation to .5 sec
redo your test
Yathani said:
its a bug
enable power saving mode and turn off cpu limit then turn off power saving mode back
go to developer option and reduce the animation to .5 sec
redo your test
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried all above, but still get 37K score. most degradation is in 3D graphics. Also in UX and single thread CPU.
Still can not understand why it happens.
I did the same thing nothing changed
Sent from my SM-N910H using XDA Free mobile app
so what were you expecting? A 75k + score after you updated?
Sent from my VZW LG G2
mrao said:
so what were you expecting? A 75k + score after you updated?
Sent from my VZW LG G2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course not, we expected the score to be at least the same !
Except the score you can notice that fps has dropped in games.
It also has some problems definitely, I have hangouts crashing several times a day.
UX runtime is much lower in my case also.
Benchmark scores are 100% useless.
zerojay said:
Benchmark scores are 100% useless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no they are not useless and I can see that on practice, performance has slowed down just like benchmark scores got lower.
Benchmark can precisely tell and measure the performance, that's it's purpose. In my case I can feel the difference not only in benchmark scores bat in practice also.
Same for me. Tried fresh wipe, re-odin, etc
Benchmarks are 100% useful and in the fact the performance has gotten worse on the beastly note 4 it feels same as note 3 is that even called update anymore. The frames per second for big games is just arownd 20 fps its very disapointinf
Sent from my SM-N910H using XDA Free mobile app
sirwanesmail said:
Benchmarks are 100% useful and in the fact the performance has gotten worse on the beastly note 4 it feels same as note 3 is that even called update anymore. The frames per second for big games is just arownd 20 fps its very disapointinf
Sent from my SM-N910H using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly what I was talking about !
Is anyone concerned about it and planning something or has samsung officials made any comment about this issue ?
Try this method & let me know about gpu bug.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3075440