I just read in geek.com there are only 8.82Gb of internal user available space in the siny S4.
I would like to find out if this true for all versions and countries or if this is some carrier's wrongdoing.
I have not received my own S4, so I cannot speak for myself yet, but if you guys can confirm this, I am going to reconsider upgrading to the i9505 16gb.
I know we can use microSD cards, but it is not the same for many apps that need lots of space (GPS navigation, some fat games....)
runaway64 said:
I just read in geek.com there are only 8.82Gb of internal user available space in the siny S4.
I would like to find out if this true for all versions and countries or if this is some carrier's wrongdoing.
I have not received my own S4, so I cannot speak for myself yet, but if you guys can confirm this, I am going to reconsider upgrading to the i9505 16gb.
I know we can use microSD cards, but it is not the same for many apps that need lots of space (GPS navigation, some fat games....)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was in an AT&T store yesterday and looked at available storage. It was about 9.3 or so. I was pretty shocked as well.
Android is becoming a teenager lol hes growing like a weed. Get the 32gb version if it isnt enough for you.
fade2green514 said:
Android is becoming a teenager lol hes growing like a weed. Get the 32gb version if it isnt enough for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because the android rom are almost 2-3gb and pre apps...
dong2007 said:
Because the android rom are almost 2-3gb and pre apps...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, my 16GB S3 (i9300) came with 11,25 user partition, but in the S4 it is 78% of that. It is a big reduction;
I would be a little less concerned if I could buy the 32 or 64gb versions today, but, at least for now, I have not seen them available anywhere.
Since they are charging even more for the S4 than they did for the S3 on launch day (699€ vs. 659€) and now storage is even cheaper, reducing the user available storage to nearly half of the advertised capacity (16gb) is outrageous.
I even could get the i9300 with a direct 10% discount (which brings it to 593€) and a 50€ gift card on launch day; This time, the best offer I could find was 70€ worth of accesories. So, less storage one year later for more money, that is what upsets me, such a great device with a cheap mistake. It is simply silly!
I would like to hear from others who already have their carrier-free S4 to enlighten us.
runaway64 said:
Well, my 16GB S3 (i9300) came with 11,25 user partition, but in the S4 it is 78% of that. It is a big reduction;
I would be a little less concerned if I could buy the 32 or 64gb versions today, but, at least for now, I have not seen them available anywhere.
Since they are charging even more for the S4 than they did for the S3 on launch day (699€ vs. 659€) and now storage is even cheaper, reducing the user available storage to nearly half of the advertised capacity (16gb) is outrageous.
I even could get the i9300 with a direct 10% discount (which brings it to 593€) and a 50€ gift card on launch day; This time, the best offer I could find was 70€ worth of accesories. So, less storage one year later for more money, that is what upsets me, such a great device with a cheap mistake. It is simply silly!
I would like to hear from others who already have their carrier-free S4 to enlighten us.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why are you so nervous about the 8-9gb? the are more than enough. U can always buy a 32 or 64Gb Sd Card.
dong2007 said:
Why are you so nervous about the 8-9gb? the are more than enough. U can always buy a 32 or 64Gb Sd Card.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am not nervous:
copilot live (europe maps): 2.2GB
Sonic4 episode 2: 386MB
nfs: most wanted, 1.89GB
google translator: 0.98GB
Real Racing 3: 1,17Gb
Dropbox: 155Mb
Google Currents: 145Mb
Asphalt7 1,61Gb
These are apps which decide is wiser to use internal storage despite having a 64Gb card installed. Since no sd card can solve this, this is the Samsung flagship and the rivals are learning, it is absurd to have 8.8gb whith the phone brand new if they say 16GB.
Maybe Apple can get away with those kind of things, but look at what happened to HTC with their Desire (and other models) when they made the same mistake!
They can make the best device in the world, but if this is true for carrier-free phones, I believe it is a huge mistake in 700€. Not because it means is the end of the world, but because it can be a real burden, because they chose to save 20$ in the BIM in a device they are selling for 700€.
I understand the want bigger margins but they should know better.
runaway64 said:
I am not nervous:
copilot live (europe maps): 2.2GB
Sonic4 episode 2: 386MB
nfs: most wanted, 1.89GB
google translator: 0.98GB
Real Racing 3: 1,17Gb
Dropbox: 155Mb
Google Currents: 145Mb
Asphalt7 1,61Gb
These are apps which decide is wiser to use internal storage despite having a 64Gb card installed. Since no sd card can solve this, this is the Samsung flagship and the rivals are learning.
Maybe Apple can get away with those kind of things, but look at what happened to HTC with their Desire (and other models) when they made the same mistake!
They can make the best device in the world, but if this is true for carrier-free phones, I believe it is a huge mistake in 700€. Not because it means is the end of the world, but because it can be a real burden, because they chose to save 20$ in the BIM in a device they are selling for 700€.
I understand the want bigger margins but they should know better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can move most of your apps/games to your Sdcard.
runaway64 said:
it is absurd to have 8.8gb whith the phone brand new if they say 16GB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I´m agree with you, but this is are classic trick. Try to check Usb sticks and SSD/HDD
dong2007 said:
You can move most of your apps/games to your Sdcard.
I´m agree with you, but this is are classic trick. Try to check Usb sticks and SSD/HDD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to root now to move to sd
yeap same issue here. I even went to Samsung store and asked to guys like, it is supposed to be 16 gb not 8 gb, they said like: you know it's the OS and other stuff, even iPhone 5 have same kind of thing, so it's not really an issue.
I was quite shocked also
MopHeadGeek said:
You have to root now to move to sd
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not with JB?
dong2007 said:
Not with JB?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry not with jelly bean not sure want you meant I'm rather tired so might not be reading it right
you have to root anything over android 4.1 to get it to work
bonjurkes said:
yeap same issue here. I even went to Samsung store and asked to guys like, it is supposed to be 16 gb not 8 gb, they said like: you know it's the OS and other stuff, even iPhone 5 have same kind of thing, so it's not really an issue.
I was quite shocked also
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sure but i phone os is only 1.5gb ...
bonjurkes said:
they said like: you know it's the OS and other stuff, even iPhone 5 have same kind of thing, so it's not really an issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
iPhone5 and storage: Exactly, they charge 100€/100$ more for each capacity doubling they offer and they get away... (but WE do not want an iPhone for things like that.
We like Samsung Galaxy among other things because they have expandable storage and removable battery.
But we shall not depend on rooting and tricks to get the capacity they were advertising.
In a side note, this not the same as a reported capacity in a USB drive or HDD: That is the loss inherent to file systems, spare area -where aplied- and 1000->1024 naming conventions. We suffer that in smartphones, tablets and iphones, that is NOT what I want to draw attention to.
I would like to find out which is the capacity in the unbranded carrier-free Galaxy S4, since I am waiting for my unit to come.
It seems to me it can be a deal breaker.
Spending about $20 on a 32gig MicroSD card isn't that big of a deal, i'd just keep that 8gigs for apps.
JUST ROOT
and use
FOLDERMOUNT to save to sd
Rooting to move apps to SD card is not the solution as many apps wont work if they detect device rooted. And why should we mess with a £500-600 phone like this. We didnt create the issue, Samsung and Google did.
rooting doesn't take care of app caches like Google Play etc..
The only proper solution is the 32gb or 64gb but these are not being sold readily. BTW the 32gb has about 23gb free. The UK S4 has 9.6gb free.
runaway64 said:
iPhone5 and storage: Exactly, they charge 100€/100$ more for each capacity doubling they offer and they get away... (but WE do not want an iPhone for things like that.
We like Samsung Galaxy among other things because they have expandable storage and removable battery.
But we shall not depend on rooting and tricks to get the capacity they were advertising.
In a side note, this not the same as a reported capacity in a USB drive or HDD: That is the loss inherent to file systems, spare area -where aplied- and 1000->1024 naming conventions. We suffer that in smartphones, tablets and iphones, that is NOT what I want to draw attention to.
I would like to find out which is the capacity in the unbranded carrier-free Galaxy S4, since I am waiting for my unit to come.
It seems to me it can be a deal breaker.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
8.3 gb for unbranded carrier-free S4. Built in Samsung and other apps (Flipboard, Chrome et etc) takes 600 mb. So it's like 8.3 GB - 600 mb free to use
Related
If you do not know Samsung Poland confirmed on their wall - no Exynos and no MicroSD slot for GT 10.1
Looks like Samsung went really all the way to make itself look like Apple - I don't think it is a smart move.
First of all, thera are not many differences between 10.1v and 10.1. If you find the old one cheaper take it! You will not loose much. One thing I am not certain is screen type in 10.1v - if you know what it is, for certain please let us know.
So... new GT is thinner, has a bit better screen and worse camera - that is it!
It is also more expensive that all of its Android competition that is offering better functionality (Acer and Asus).
Yes, they are thicker and heavier but the difference is not that big like 50%.
What is more they offer a lot more I/O ports for better connectivity and PRICE.
As it seems none of the tablets of the current generation is THERE yet, to fulfil most of our expectations this means we have to settle for something to get by, something cheap... a lesser evil. Is GT 10.1 it? I do not think so.
It will loose in volume against the iPad 2. This is certain (apple has better marketing and is already on the market). What is more bigger sales means for many people that it "=" it is better.
It will (probably) loose against Asus - price and features says so. GT is only better design wise. Do you really want to pay extra for few grams less and few mm less?
It might even loose against upcoming Amazon tablets.
Now... if we are really to see quad core tablets this year or q1 next and also tablets with Windows 8 on board this means now you want tablet that is THE CHEAPEST and will loose as little as possible.
In my opinion it will be (today) Acer/Asus basic model or iPad2 (as this will always find its buyer).
Samsung shame on you! (at least in theory) You had winning cards on your hands and all you did was - nothing :-(
In my case it is decision time - get something (16GB) cheap or just f..k it and wait.
galtom said:
If you do not know Samsung Poland confirmed on their wall - no Exynos and no MicroSD slot for GT 10.1
Looks like Samsung went really all the way to make itself look like Apple - I don't think it is a smart move.
First of all, thera are not many differences between 10.1v and 10.1. If you find the old one cheaper take it! You will not loose much. One thing I am not certain is screen type in 10.1v - if you know what it is, for certain please let us know.
So... new GT is thinner, has a bit better screen and worse camera - that is it!
It is also more expensive that all of its Android competition that is offering better functionality (Acer and Asus).
Yes, they are thicker and heavier but the difference is not that big like 50%.
What is more they offer a lot more I/O ports for better connectivity and PRICE.
As it seems none of the tablets of the current generation is THERE yet, to fulfil most of our expectations this means we have to settle for something to get by, something cheap... a lesser evil. Is GT 10.1 it? I do not think so.
It will loose in volume against the iPad 2. This is certain (apple has better marketing and is already on the market). What is more bigger sales means for many people that it "=" it is better.
It will (probably) loose against Asus - price and features says so. GT is only better design wise. Do you really want to pay extra for few grams less and few mm less?
It might even loose against upcoming Amazon tablets.
Now... if we are really to see quad core tablets this year or q1 next and also tablets with Windows 8 on board this means now you want tablet that is THE CHEAPEST and will loose as little as possible.
In my opinion it will be (today) Acer/Asus basic model or iPad2 (as this will always find its buyer).
Samsung shame on you! (at least in theory) You had winning cards on your hands and all you did was - nothing :-(
In my case it is decision time - get something (16GB) cheap or just f..k it and wait.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You really don't make valid points. SD card slot is useless to the average consumer in HC as you have to Root to even use it ! You complaining 'get something cheap' sorry buddy 499.99$ and 599.99$ is cheap iPhone 4s sell for 400 even.
To answer your question YES people will pay for something as thin and light as the iPad but running Android. Common sense
I suspect the Tegra 2 must be a Honeycomb thing. Seems on the Galaxy S 2 get the Exynos, but the tablet doesn't. Maybe Google had to make some shortcuts getting Honeycomb out quickly and only optimized it for Tegra 2? *shrug*
The Galaxy Tab 10.1 gives up a lot of features. I had a Transformer and it was really hard making the decision between features and low cost versus basically comfort.
I broke it down this way to myself. The Transformer is a hybrid device. It can be a okay-ish tablet or and okay-ish Android netbook. I don't think it really excels at either, as comprimises do seem to have been made so it can do both.
The Galaxy Tab 10.1 however is no hybrid. It's a pure tablet. It's design to be comfortable and to consume data.
End the end I decided I don't need a hybrid. I got a laptop, so I want my tablet to give me the best tablet experience possible and try not to be more than it can be. So no HDMI out to TVs, no fancy netbook style keyboard dock, sadly even no micro SD.
The lack of micro SD hurts the most. I don't think it's a sacrifice Samsung needed to make. It feels like a business move to help boost sales of the more expensive models. It's a business and I think it's a decision they are able to get away with at this time because the competition isn't strong enough on the Android side. I would have thought including micro SD could have been smart to maybe sway some people thinking about an iPad 2, and this feature could be an extra differentiating feature.
Oh well, we've beaten the micro SD dead horse quite a bit though. But at least with Android it'll be easier to drag and drop files between the internal storage and a computer if I need to shuffle things around for more space.
There is always the option of just waiting. But I really don't see any manufactures coming out with a very light tablet like Samsung. So it could be quite a wait.
jamaicansolja said:
You really don't make valid points. SD card slot is useless to the average consumer in HC as you have to Root to even use it ! You complaining 'get something cheap' sorry buddy 499.99$ and 599.99$ is cheap iPhone 4s sell for 400 even.
To answer your question YES people will pay for something as thin and light as the iPad but running Android. Common sense
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I am assuming that since it is there and more tablets are actually getting to the shops worldwide - it will work.
I never said no one will buy it . One would say that a MAN has to be mad to get an ipad or iPhone when there is so many better things out there... and than you look at cash Apple makes and amount of stuff it sells.
If you think Samsung product will win just because it is (bit) thinner and (bit) lighter- I say you are wrong.
But as I do not love Apple I really wish the best to Sammy - it is just that thinner and lighter is not enough for me to spend my money.
jamaicansolja said:
You really don't make valid points. SD card slot is useless to the average consumer in HC as you have to Root to even use it ! You complaining 'get something cheap' sorry buddy 499.99$ and 599.99$ is cheap iPhone 4s sell for 400 even.
To answer your question YES people will pay for something as thin and light as the iPad but running Android. Common sense
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It sounds like he's comparing the Transformer with the Galaxy Tab 10.1. With the Transformer, you don't have to root to use the micro SD, it's working right out of the box.
So you can buy a $400 16GB Transformer, insert a $20 16GB micro SD card and have a 32GB tablet for $420. To get 32GB of storage with the Galaxy Tab 10.1, that costs $600. So the $180 premium for the GT 10.1 is kinda difficult to embrace.
And this is kinda my complaint with many of the tablets. Why are they charging +$100 to go from 16GB to 32GB. 16GB is not worth $100 and I think this is what makes the lack of micro SD particularly troubling. I would have less of a problem having no external storage if I didn't feel like I was being robbed. Haha.
And kudos to Acer for being a little more civil. 16GB A500 costs $450 and the 32GB is $500. So at least they only charge $50 more for 16GB of additional storage.
galtom said:
If you do not know Samsung Poland confirmed on their wall - no Exynos and no MicroSD slot for GT 10.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you already knew the answer after so many posts, do you?
galtom said:
Looks like Samsung went really all the way to make itself look like Apple - I don't think it is a smart move.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably, but probably not. At least Samsung is right on the phone side, the Samsung Galaxy S is one of the best selling Android phones, if not simply the best.
galtom said:
First of all, thera are not many differences between 10.1v and 10.1. If you find the old one cheaper take it! You will not loose much. One thing I am not certain is screen type in 10.1v - if you know what it is, for certain please let us know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You right, but for some of users, the look and form factor are quite important.
If you think 10.1v is OK, then go for it.
At least, the 10.1v has been REPLACED by the 10.1, by Samsung.
Meaning, it will be (or already) discontinued.
Will you buy that 10.1v? If you do, then good luck!
galtom said:
So... new GT is thinner, has a bit better screen and worse camera - that is it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it is thinner and some people like that and prefer that. And there is nothing wrong with it.
If you like the chubby and fat one, that's also OK. Some people like fat girl/dude
All in all, why arguing about 10.1v?
Samsung made it obsolete, even Vodafone UK has replaced it with the new 10.1.
There is no point arguing 10.1v, it is history now.
And the camera, yeah, some of use don't really care with camera on a tablet!
It is no use and you look like an idiot for holding it to make a photo.
Also, all of us has our cool 5 or 8 MP Android smartphone with decent camera.
That camera on the front of tablet is for VIDEO CHAT, and you don't need high res for that. Why? To reduce the network bandwidth requirement of course!
galtom said:
It is also more expensive that all of its Android competition that is offering better functionality (Acer and Asus).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, ASUS is cheaper. But it is different form factor. Some people might not like it, like me And if you really follow the news or ASUS TF forum you might see the built quality is not that good.
It is your choice, and that's good on Android.
YOU HAVE CHOICES.
Do you want GT 10.1 to not be released just because of there is a cheaper ASUS?
Or do you think GT 10.1 should be priced at the ASUS price level?
Oh yeah, we will LOVE cheaper product.
But, alas, that does not ... Too bad ... too bad.
However, some people will still buy more expensive one. Why? It's a choice!
They might like the thinner form factor ... They might like the PLS display ... They might like the TouchWiz!!!
Are those people stupid? NO!!! It's their choice with their money.
Are those people who choose ASUS TF stupid? NO!!! NO!!! They have their needs.
People have different needs.
And we should be thankful to Android world ... THERE ARE CHOICES.
galtom said:
Yes, they are thicker and heavier but the difference is not that big like 50%.
What is more they offer a lot more I/O ports for better connectivity and PRICE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yupe, that's true.
Unfortunately, this is NOT DELL, where you can choose what do you want, build on order type of thing.
That does not exist till now on Android world.
I hope someday that will be, where we can choose which processor, how much internal memory, amount of RAM, software, UI, slots, whatnot.
Till then, choose whatever available
galtom said:
As it seems none of the tablets of the current generation is THERE yet, to fulfil most of our expectations this means we have to settle for something to get by, something cheap... a lesser evil. Is GT 10.1 it? I do not think so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According who? You?
Yes, you
And you are right ... but, right according you.
There is nothing wrong with your opinion.
So others! The people who choose GT 10.1
galtom said:
It will loose in volume against the iPad 2. This is certain (apple has better marketing and is already on the market). What is more bigger sales means for many people that it "=" it is better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For sure it will. Note, the Android tablet world is still new
galtom said:
It will (probably) loose against Asus - price and features says so. GT is only better design wise. Do you really want to pay extra for few grams less and few mm less?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ASUS? I don't care ... and some users don't care either! See in some forum threads, some people returned their ASUS TF to get this GT 10.1.
They are exists! People who choose GT 10.1 instead of ASUS.
Including me.
Something wrong with ASUS? Probably! Probably not, however you cannot simply say that ASUS is better than GT 10.1 just because it is cheaper Nah, that would be to simple ... for some, $100 different is nothing compare to the satisfaction of the device itself.
galtom said:
It might even loose against upcoming Amazon tablets.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So what??? I don't get it.
This is business 101. Something might be better compare to the other.
Do you think there is no user bought those tablet with Froyo?
You wrong! There are people bought that
galtom said:
Now... if we are really to see quad core tablets this year or q1 next and also tablets with Windows 8 on board this means now you want tablet that is THE CHEAPEST and will loose as little as possible.
In my opinion it will be (today) Acer/Asus basic model or iPad2 (as this will always find its buyer).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha Yeah right ... Wait for that Windows 8 or buy Acer/ASUS/iPad2
There is nothing wrong with that. It's your choice.
galtom said:
Samsung shame on you! (at least in theory) You had winning cards on your hands and all you did was - nothing :-(
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing? You kidding me? Did you read all those reviews? Did you?
Right, that's your opinion and there is nothing wrong with that.
Others (a lot of them) disagree, others who said GT 10.1 is the sleekest Android tablet to date
galtom said:
In my case it is decision time - get something (16GB) cheap or just f..k it and wait.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, please wait I think that's the best for you and I already said that many times hehehe ...
I know, you just disappointed that you don't get the "PERFECT" device as you wished or dreamed. And now you are just throwing all your disappointment like this. I know
You know (you knew), there is no perfect device, not yet. But some people are not that picky or have different usage pattern. Those people might choose something which is available right now. And enjoy the toy ... enjoy the life and play with it
So, be happy as you still have your passion for Android tablet.
Keep wishing and keep dreaming (as I do as well), that someday ... some manufacturer ... will make that magical device like in our dream.
*gosh ... I cannot believe that I typed this all *
Ravynmagi said:
It sounds like he's comparing the Transformer with the Galaxy Tab 10.1. With the Transformer, you don't have to root to use the micro SD, it's working right out of the box.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
R u sure of that? That at Asus microSD just simply works?!?
Now.... that just makes an ass out of Moto
galtom said:
R u sure of that? That at Asus microSD just simply works?!?
Now.... that just makes an ass out of Moto
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Positive. I've owned two Transformers already. They are nice tablets. It was very tough deciding between the Transformer and Galaxy Tab 10.1.
Besides what I already mentioned, I also don't like the Transformer speakers though. They are weak and off balance.
One another thing. Read the Galaxy Tab 10.1 review at anandtech.com. They tested the camera on the GT 10.1 and compared it with the Transformer.
We get reminded megapixel size isn't everything. Anandtech.com found the picture quality on the 3MP GT 10.1 camera better than the 5MP Transformer camera.
Ravynmagi said:
It sounds like he's comparing the Transformer with the Galaxy Tab 10.1. With the Transformer, you don't have to root to use the micro SD, it's working right out of the box.
So you can buy a $400 16GB Transformer, insert a $20 16GB micro SD card and have a 32GB tablet for $420. To get 32GB of storage with the Galaxy Tab 10.1, that costs $600. So the $180 premium for the GT 10.1 is kinda difficult to embrace.
And this is kinda my complaint with many of the tablets. Why are they charging +$100 to go from 16GB to 32GB. 16GB is not worth $100 and I think this is what makes the lack of micro SD particularly troubling. I would have less of a problem having no external storage if I didn't feel like I was being robbed. Haha.
And kudos to Acer for being a little more civil. 16GB A500 costs $450 and the 32GB is $500. So at least they only charge $50 more for 16GB of additional storage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
name brand high class 16gb cards are 40$+ not 20.
Well, I played with GT 10.1 for a bit on Samsung Mobile Live Stands. I do like its design a lot (but I am not sure it would be enough to spend a lot more than on Transformer).
So far in Poland it is impossible to even touch any other tablet beside iPad2 :-(
Transformer and Iconia are in pre-order status. And I do want to touch before I buy - this stuff aint actually cheap so I want to make my choice right.
At the moment (as much as I love GT 10.1) Transformer looks smarter (FOR ME !) but once I will be able to actually use it for a bit than I will know.
Then it will all be in price difference as mentioned above. I would not be as worried if I could at least watch Netflix on HC . But with no Netflix, no 720p high profile there is not much to actually watch on tablet in Poland (not my fault)!
Yes it is all my opinions, I think I can have one?
gogol:
10.1v - would I buy old, discontinued product... if price would be good YES. In this case all internals are the same so it is not like support for 10.1v will end because of 10.1. It is the same device ;-)
Yay! I was just thinking to myself, "Two threads on SD cards aren't enough -- I wish someone would create a third thread."
Sorry, it is just that I have felt really disappointed about this. Happens :-(
jamaicansolja said:
name brand high class 16gb cards are 40$+ not 20.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
16GB Sandisk class 4 (which is a lot better than most of the so called more expensive class 10 cards) for $18.
http://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-SDSDQM-016G-B35-16GB-Microsd-Memory/dp/B001F7AJKI
You can find a lot of good Sandisk 16GB micro SD cards under $20, very easily. And because you aren't running an OS off these cards, but using it mostly for storage, it doesn't have to be lightning fast either, just good quality.
PS. Though, should you want to run an OS off of it, such as for a Nook Color, the San Disk cards are awesome at that too, because they have really great 4K read/write performance.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1005633
Berner said:
Yay! I was just thinking to myself, "Two threads on SD cards aren't enough -- I wish someone would create a third thread."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, there are a lot more than just 2 threads.
Ravynmagi said:
16GB Sandisk class 4 (which is a lot better than most of the so called more expensive class 10 cards) for $18.
http://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-SDSDQM-016G-B35-16GB-Microsd-Memory/dp/B001F7AJKI
You can find a lot of good Sandisk 16GB micro SD cards under $20, very easily. And because you aren't running an OS off these cards, but using it mostly for storage, it doesn't have to be lightning fast either, just good quality.
PS. Though, should you want to run an OS off of it, such as for a Nook Color, the San Disk cards are awesome at that too, because they have really great 4K read/write performance.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1005633
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so then why are you linking a class 2 card for 20$. Far different than class 10. You serious about why you would want a fast card ? Put a 1gb movie file on a class 2 the on class 10.
galtom said:
R u sure of that? That at Asus microSD just simply works?!?
Now.... that just makes an ass out of Moto
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I own a TF and I can confirm that too. SD card works out of the box, no issues, no rooting required
jamaicansolja said:
so then why are you linking a class 2 card for 20$. Far different than class 10. You serious about why you would want a fast card ? Put a 1gb movie file on a class 2 the on class 10.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a $35 Patriot Class 10, a $30 Wintech Class 10, and a $20 Sandisk Class 4 (packaging says Class 2, but Sandisk mostly ships just C4 these days).
The Patriot and Wintech give nice looking benchmarks with CDM. But in the real world, I can copy a 1GB file to the SanDisk Class 4 faster than to either Class 10 micro SD cards.
Sandisk makes really awesome micros SD cards. People don't need to spend an arm and leg on some mega fast 20MB/s write speed card just for a tablet. But if you wanted to, that is an option that would still be far cheaper than what Samsung is charging you for their internal storage, which according to the Antutu benchmark isn't even quite class 10 itself (though I haven't had the chance to do an actual file copy to it to see how fast it really is).
Got to say I agree with the OP - had high hopes for this tablet as it combined the style of the ipad2, android and I hoped micro SD, but the lack of the latter has really put me off. The still unknown UK release date doesn't help either - do samsung really have such a lack of respect for their prospective customers? It's a shame as they do a lot right - the galaxy S phones are superb.
My thoughts on the SD slot and the Tab in general
Have to say I don't agree with the OP.
A few thoughts:
-Samsung Poland doesn't mean that Samsung USA or other countries will not have an SD card slot.
-From internal sources I heard that the plan was to release the tab with the micro sd (that's why you see it in many pictures). Something went wrong with either software or hardware (most probably hardware) and since Samsung had the June 8th date already set up they released it without.
They probably thought is better to release a product than to postpone (don't forget they have deals with distributors, Amazon, Best Buy, etc.) and they probably thought that the problem is hardware related, otherwise they could fix it later on with a software release.
If you think about it, it doesn't make sense to show so many pictures with a micro sd slot and then scratch it out completely - if they could have included it they would have done it.
Having said that, the chances that Verizon's version will have an SD slot are small, since even Verizon's website doesn't mention it. But that was indeed the plan. We will know soon.
-Saying that because of the lack of an sd card slot the whole tablet is not competitive anymore doesn't make any sense.
The 10.1V is thicker and heavier. And for a product that is supposed to be used on the go all the time that makes a huge difference.
As a matter of fact, every single tablet on the marker is thicker and heavier. So Sd card or not Samsung put so much into the design that it will have a winner.
The better camera on the 10.1 is not a deciding factor for 99.9% of the people.
Proof is the Ipad's 2 cameras megapixels are very low. On top of that, people don't buy tablets to take photos.
(Check this out http://www.buzzfeed.com/burnred/spike-lee-uses-his-ipad-to-photograph-president-ba-281t ... people still make fun of him...)
-I am also pissed off about the sd card, but at the end of the day an Sd card slot saves $ 20 - 30 to the consumer.
It gets down to that. Most consumers will still buy an sd / usb adapter no matter what.
-All this talk about Exynos but really every single Android Table is running on Tegra 2 - so if you were expecting the 10.1 to run on Exynos without reading / hearing anything about before you should have known it's a long shot
-In a mobile world there are 2, 3 main operating systems, so the form factor IS everything.
Look at the ipad 2, they added a camera and slimmed down the tablet and people rushed to sell their ipad 1 to get the new one.
Look at the Xoom, the software works, the connections are there, but you put it in your bag and you might as well cancel your gym membership because you will be lifting weights.
I saw the Tab 10.1, it's super slim, it's super light, it has a nice screen and it runs Android 3.1.
The deciding factor is the form and nothing else.
I'm thinking about getting the 8gb model, but is the 16gb really worth $50 more? What do you guys think? I'm not sure if I will have enough space for custom roms and backups. As for music and other stuff I'm planning to store it on the cloud.
Thanks in advance
mbrinker96 said:
I'm thinking about getting the 8gb model, but is the 16gb really worth $50 more? What do you guys think? I'm not sure if I will have enough space for custom roms and backups. As for music and other stuff I'm planning to store it on the cloud.
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope you're "thankful" for this.
just kiddin.
Okay, so a ROM usually is 300mb-1gb. But I'm guessing because they're AOSP roms, we're looking @ 300mb-600mb. 600 being a really bloated rom. Secondly, games will take up a bunch of space, so beware of that (1-3 gb's). Apps will take ~1gb. The partition will be reduced cause of the Android ~2gb. And don't even think about adding music, you won't have room for that.
In other words, 8gb's means you're sacrificing something. Either apps, music, or roms.
Get the 16GB. Honestly.
qwahchees said:
I hope you're "thankful" for this.
just kiddin.
Okay, so a ROM usually is 300mb-1gb. But I'm guessing because they're AOSP roms, we're looking @ 300mb-600mb. 600 being a really bloated rom. Secondly, games will take up a bunch of space, so beware of that (1-3 gb's). Apps will take ~1gb. The partition will be reduced cause of the Android ~2gb. And don't even think about adding music, you won't have room for that.
In other words, 8gb's means you're sacrificing something. Either apps, music, or roms.
Get the 16GB. Honestly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I forgot about the reduced partition, well at least it's not too much more for the 16gb.
I will get 8GB. I just don't need much space. I use my phone mainly for browsing, forums and simple games. After 1 year, I still have 10GB left. So, it depends how you want to use your phone? Lots of music, HD games? Then take 16GB.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
16GB all the way for me! The more the merrier is what I say! Take all you can get!
Probably 16gb for my usage...
Don't know if this is important to you or not, but even if you were ok with 8gb, a year down the road, you will have a hard time selling it seeing as how 8gb sounds ridiculous even now. Games and apps are surely not going to decrease in size with time Its just 60 odd dollars more for double the storage, go for it!
Realistically speaking, 8 would work for me. I'm getting the 16 anyways.
A) Resale
B) Don't have to worry about how many pics I take (especially with Photosphere)
C) I like pie. :laugh:
If in doubt get the 8GB and a 32GB Wi-Drive like me.
donec said:
If in doubt get the 8GB and a 32GB Wi-Drive like me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wi-drive?
Sent from my A510 using Tapatalk 2
donec said:
If in doubt get the 8GB and a 32GB Wi-Drive like me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've got a 500gb GoFlex by Seagate.
The perks of working at Best Buy
I'm also getting the 8gb.
I'm gona get 8gb and let otg take the strain if 8 isn't enough, however the N4 only has to last me a year max then it becomes my spare having decided what hi end LTE phone I buy at some point in 2013, presuming the Mayan interpreters are wrong.
Same here,getting the 8 GB too. :fingers-crossed:
8GB would probably work for me if I don't use it for my mp3 player. But I'm pretty positive I'll be going with the 16GB anyway. Better safe than sorry.
I will get the 8gb as well. Considering I don't use my phone for more than a year, I wouldn't want to spend more than I have to.
In terms of resale value, the selling price is quite low so I would be happy if I can sell for 200s
Sent from my SGH-T679 using Tapatalk 2
c_86 said:
Wi-drive?
Sent from my A510 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00576APEI/ref=ox_sc_sfl_title_1?ie=UTF8&smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER
http://www.kingston.com/us/usb/wireless#wid
I'm going for the 8gb version. I have all 40-something gigs of my music on google music so basically the only thing on the phone will be apps and pictures which are going to take up nowhere near 5/6 gigs. Plus I have 5gb of google drive, 25gb of dropbox, and there are plenty of other free cloud sites out there.
I was considering the 16 gig but for what? I don't put vids on my phone, I do have pics but they don't take lots of space, I have plenty of apps that don't even use a gig of memory, the most that I use storage for is to back up roms. Everytime there's a new version of the rom, I back it up and delete the old back up. I think 8 gig is enough for me, 4gig was enough on my old sensation.......
Sent from my iPad mini using Tapatalk HD
Euthye said:
I'm gona get 8gb and let otg take the strain if 8 isn't enough, however the N4 only has to last me a year max then it becomes my spare having decided what hi end LTE phone I buy at some point in 2013, presuming the Mayan interpreters are wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In all the panic I ended up getting the 16gb, I'm very impressed with my phone, I'm coming from a Note but the Nexus 4 seems way smoother and faster, got a slim tpu case and a vertical flip cheapy off Amazon atm I'm waiting for a Nilkin Flip which will prob be the main case unless Poetic bring out an Atmosphere Flip for the Nexus 4.
8gb if you don't hear music and/or have a load of videos.
I don't, so I went for the 8gb, I have 3gb free and 50gb on my dropbox.
I want to get the 8gb N4 because that 299 price tag looks so good, but I am scared to because I feel like the resale value will be not so great. What do you guys think??
i think the re-sale value will maintain well. Especially if the next gen nexus is of a higher cost than this gen.
Robert_W said:
i think the re-sale value will maintain well. Especially if the next gen nexus is of a higher cost than this gen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I feel like there would be a lot more demand for the 16gb if I were to list it on craigslist or something similar. Maybe I'm just being too harsh on the lil 8 gigger haha
I think that for an extra $50, you get double the storage and, if you decide to sell, twice the appeal in the after market. If you can afford the extra $50, I'd suggest you dig deep and get the 16. You can always use < 16 GBs of space but you can't use > 8 if you need it.
there will always he a higher demand for higher capacity. But many look for the best price, and the 8gb will still be cheaper than the 16gb
The thing is I know I'm not going to fill up the 8gb (or closer to 5.5 to 6) because I use google music and dropbox/drive. The only things I would have on it would be apps and photos. I do have the $50 but I would rather put it towards either the wireless charger or a portable charger. I guess I am just not convinced to get the 16 yet. I sound like a woman haha
Robert_W said:
there will always he a higher demand for higher capacity. But many look for the best price, and the 8gb will still be cheaper than the 16gb
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is very true, you get a thanks for that!
ctowne said:
The thing is I know I'm not going to fill up the 8gb (or closer to 5.5 to 6) because I use google music and dropbox/drive. The only things I would have on it would be apps and photos. I do have the $50 but I would rather put it towards either the wireless charger or a portable charger. I guess I am just not convinced to get the 16 yet. I sound like a woman haha
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can understand but . . . . do you know how many times I've said "oh, I'll never use XXX much space". On computers, phones, iPod, etc. And the one time it happens that you need just a LITTLE more space, you will be be pissed at yourself. I think someone said that in the 8 GB model, only like 5.5 GBs are actually usable. Maybe you get bored of stock android and you want to start switching ROMs. Maybe you use Google Music but you'd like one of your favorite playlists to save to the phone so you don't have to stream it, who knows.
I really would use the extra $50 for the 16. I'd also wait a little for the charging orb thing. If it really catches on it is my experience that all sorts of smart people will start manufacturing cheaper clones that are just as good.
Sounds to me like someone has already made their decision long ago and only made this thread to burn time until launch.
Take a look at what the 8gb n7 is going for now that they restructured the pricing with release of the 32gb. Some people are pissed they are loosing their arses on it.
MN_Bug said:
I can understand but . . . . do you know how many times I've said "oh, I'll never use XXX much space". On computers, phones, iPod, etc. And the one time it happens that you need just a LITTLE more space, you will be be pissed at yourself. I think someone said that in the 8 GB model, only like 5.5 GBs are actually usable. Maybe you get bored of stock android and you want to start switching ROMs. Maybe you use Google Music but you'd like one of your favorite playlists to save to the phone so you don't have to stream it, who knows.
I really would use the extra $50 for the 16. I'd also wait a little for the charging orb thing. If it really catches on it is my experience that all sorts of smart people will start manufacturing cheaper clones that are just as good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are making very good points and making me even more torn between the two, if that was even possible..
giant22000 said:
Take a look at what the 8gb n7 is going for now that they restructured the pricing with release of the 32gb. Some people are pissed they are loosing their arses on it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also a valid point. We very well could see a 32gb version in a few months.
ctowne said:
Also a valid point. We very well could see a 32gb version in a few months.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If the 16GB becomes $300, I can wait
ctowne said:
Also a valid point. We very well could see a 32gb version in a few months.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe, the Galaxy Nexus never saw a 32 (the actual Google phone), but the N7 did. I wouldn't bet much that we'll see an N4 with 32 GBs.
I think I'll go for the 8 unless someone really convinces me otherwise. And hey if it's not enough i'll sell it and buy the 16 while its still fresh on the market. Also, if they do in fact come out with a white one I would be interested to see what it would look like.
ctowne said:
I think I'll go for the 8 unless someone really convinces me otherwise. And hey if it's not enough i'll sell it and buy the 16 while its still fresh on the market. Also, if they do in fact come out with a white one I would be interested to see what it would look like.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Darnit, I thought I was so close to convincing you! :angel:
MN_Bug said:
Darnit, I thought I was so close to convincing you! :angel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha you did a very good job! "A" for effort. I just feel like phone manufacturers charge ridiculous amounts for extra storage. The 16 probably costs LG/Google less than $15 extra from the 8. That's probably overshooting it too. You can get an 8 gig micro sd for practically nothing nowadays.
The 8GB N7 was $200, and many people would only offer $140-$160 for it as of recently. I think I'll be going 16GB this time around with the N4 though; hopefully it won't be discontinued too quickly
espionage724 said:
The 8GB N7 was $200, and many people would only offer $140-$160 for it as of recently. I think I'll be going 16GB this time around with the N4 though; hopefully it won't be discontinued too quickly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why would it be discontinued?
I think a lot of what you can get for a slightly used Nexus 4 be it 8GB or 16GB will depend on how soon you want to sell it. Also it will depend on if Google sells out at some point.
I was at best but checking out the note 5 and I saw this. I'm really not buying this **** now. They are pretty much forcing you to buy the 64gb version for $80 more dollars. 11gb free GTFO!
calm down, System Memory is 7.8GB on my AT&T version
flex3269 said:
I was at best but checking out the note 5 and I saw this. I'm really not buying this **** now. They are pretty much forcing you to buy the 64gb version for $80 more dollars. 11gb free GTFO!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SM-N920C cihazımdan Tapatalk kullanılarak gönderildi
that is screwed up!
That is horrendous.
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Premium HD app
flex3269 said:
I was at best but checking out the note 5 and I saw this. I'm really not buying this **** now. They are pretty much forcing you to buy the 64gb version for $80 more dollars. 11gb free GTFO!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read something on the Android Central forums that the display models have more space taken up. A few people who have the phone have said there is about 22gb free on the 32gb version.
Jeez people don't over react. Those demo phones have a ton of crap on them.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
Whether or not the demo versions have more space used or not really isn't the point.
The issue is that since there is no sd card the 32 GB of internal storage should be 32 GB accessible by the user.
What comes installed on the phone should be in a separate partition from the 32 GB of user storage.
pool_shark said:
Whether or not the demo versions have more space used or not really isn't the point.
The issue is that since there is no sd card the 32 GB of internal storage should be 32 GB accessible by the user.
What comes installed on the phone should be in a separate partition from the 32 GB of user storage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly! Thank you!
pool_shark said:
Whether or not the demo versions have more space used or not really isn't the point.
The issue is that since there is no sd card the 32 GB of internal storage should be 32 GB accessible by the user.
What comes installed on the phone should be in a separate partition from the 32 GB of user storage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Literally every company does this, I know of no phone manufacturer that wouldn't count the OS towards your internal storage even though it's not user accessible.
Samsung didn't start this trend, why should samsung be the ones to stop it? Its a common industry practice, and everyone knows it and has known it for years, anyone acting shocked or outraged over this hasn't bought a phone in the last decade.
****ing hell this is bad...
RandyBoyz92 said:
****ing hell this is bad...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its 22GB, demo models always have a ton of bloat on them.
Kaboose666 said:
Literally every company does this, I know of no phone manufacturer that wouldn't count the OS towards your internal storage even though it's not user accessible.
Samsung didn't start this trend, why should samsung be the ones to stop it? Its a common industry practice, and everyone knows it and has known it for years, anyone acting shocked or outraged over this hasn't bought a phone in the last decade.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So if one business does some shady ****, its ok for all businesses? Samsung isn't the only one at fault but they stripped us of 2 of the features that made a lot of people turn to them over other manufacturers. The SD card and removable battery. Yes the os being counted towards the user storage is common practice, but that doesn't make it right. Atm I'm using my galaxy note 4 and my galaxy s5 n I don't think I'll be buying from Sammy anymore.
NyceHS said:
So if one business does some shady ****, its ok for all businesses? Samsung isn't the only one at fault but they stripped us of 2 of the features that made a lot of people turn to them over other manufacturers. The SD card and removable battery. Yes the os being counted towards the user storage is common practice, but that doesn't make it right. Atm I'm using my galaxy note 4 and my galaxy s5 n I don't think I'll be buying from Sammy anymore.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well go ahead and move to another company, but you're getting lied to in exactly the same manner.
Also, it's not like samsung didn't want to add mSD support, they had it in the Note4 because it used eMMC memory still and the eMMC memory controller also has SD card support built in. So the same memory controller is used for both. The newer UFS 2.0 memory controller doesn't have SD card support so samsung physically can't add an mSD card slot, even if they wanted to the memory controller wouldn't read anything because it doesn't recognize the SD standard. Samsung either had to go with slower system memory (eMMC) or leave out the mSD card slot. Which is why every phone that has UFS 2.0 memory doesn't have mSD card slots. It's not because they don't want you to have it, it' because it is not compatible with the memory controller.
I personally would prefer faster system memory to make sure my OS isn't laggy. But hey, you go with whatever phone you want, enjoy your slow eMMC memory.
flex3269 said:
I was at best but checking out the note 5 and I saw this. I'm really not buying this **** now. They are pretty much forcing you to buy the 64gb version for $80 more dollars. 11gb free GTFO!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't buy it, problem solved. Relax.
Relax. Store models have the retail experience bloat on them.
Everything ever made with any kind of memory and an os counts it towards your memory. It's how it is, it isn't new. Keep your Note 4, the Note 5 isn't for you.
NyceHS said:
So if one business does some shady ****, its ok for all businesses? Samsung isn't the only one at fault but they stripped us of 2 of the features that made a lot of people turn to them over other manufacturers. The SD card and removable battery. Yes the os being counted towards the user storage is common practice, but that doesn't make it right. Atm I'm using my galaxy note 4 and my galaxy s5 n I don't think I'll be buying from Sammy anymore.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guess what....you didn't get to use all the memory you paid for on the phones you have right now either. You got the shaft when you bought those also. Why are you just now complaining about it?
You guys are acting like you're forced to buy and only use a Samsung phone... I also was disappointed in the no sd card, removeable battery, ir blaster, etc... But guess what I got over it and didn't buy a note 5. OS using some of the internal storage has existed for years. Don't be alarmed but you laptop os does the same thing.....
Sent from my SM-G925V using Xparent Green Tapatalk 2
Rippley05 said:
Relax. Store models have the retail experience bloat on them.
Everything ever made with any kind of memory and an os counts it towards your memory. It's how it is, it isn't new. Keep your Note 4, the Note 5 isn't for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
14Go used from the beginning is OK for a 64Go version but for a 32Go version, it's nearly half the space. Not so good IMO.
But I will assume that if you buy a 32Go phone with no SD-card slot, you don't need to much space for your file.
alex9898 said:
14Go used from the beginning is OK for a 64Go version but for a 32Go version, it's nearly half the space. Not so good IMO.
But I will assume that if you buy a 32Go phone with no SD-card slot, you don't need to much space for your file.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's only 10.25Gb, not 14gb. Only the retail demo unit has that much. The normal is still just ~10.25gb which should give you around 22GB.
Well, My last phone was the N5X 16 GB and I really dont know which variant of the OP5 I should be going for. OFC the higher end one has it's benefits but considering the price is it really worth it? I plan on using the phone for atleast 2 years and I've never used any device over 32 GB memory. Personally I think the higher end model is an overkill. If any of you have used phones with storages over 64GB what are the benefits (other than the obvious ones). I plan on flashing the phone every month or so. Mostly I'll be using it as my primary device for testing. Considering VR is in the scenes do you think 8 GB will be more than necessary?
I don't think 8GB of RAM is necessary at all, but $60 for a jump to 128GB was worth it IMO, and the extra RAM was just the icing on the cake. Most companies charge a $100 premium for a storage bump alone.
Better get 8/128 GB version to be future proof.
Th3_Dark_Knight said:
Better get 8/128 GB version to be future proof.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No need to worry about that. 1+ will ensure it's timely death in lacking updates forcing everyone to upgrade.
Goronok said:
No need to worry about that. 1+ will kill ensure it's timely death in lacking updates forcing everyone to upgrade.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For a sub $500 phone and an unlocked bootloader, I'm perfectly fine with them botching updates since I'm going to get the same from Samsung, Motorola, LG, etc. on their $600+ phones.
core2kid said:
For a sub $500 phone and an unlocked bootloader, I'm perfectly fine with them botching updates since I'm going to get the same from Samsung, Motorola, LG, etc. on their $600+ phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, no doubt. Was just saying a purchased based on the thought process of being "future proof" doesn't make much sense.
Goronok said:
Oh, no doubt. Was just saying a purchased based on the thought process of being "future proof" doesn't make much sense.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah but I don't think saying it's not worth future proofing your phone is a reasonable response. With Custom ROMs, apps requiring more memory, and as more of life just relies on smartphones, I think it's wise to get more RAM and double the storage.
Goronok said:
Oh, no doubt. Was just saying a purchased based on the thought process of being "future proof" doesn't make much sense.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We are discussing this on xda. OP has enjoyed very good support from dev community. So "future proof" does make sense in that respect.
Th3_Dark_Knight said:
We are discussing this on xda. OP has enjoyed very good support from dev community. So "future proof" does make sense in that respect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
considering rom backups, music and pictures i dont think i'll ever exceed 30 - 40 GB. What do I use the rest of the storage for lol. Most of my stuff is already on drive and pictures on google photos. I don't think 128 Gigs will future proof anything.
Goronok said:
No need to worry about that. 1+ will ensure it's timely death in lacking updates forcing everyone to upgrade.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hahah sure but there are custom roms.. and who uses their phone over 2 years these days.
These are my questions too. I had to wait til payday to buy the phone, which they didn't hold it for me like they said they would. So now I'm waiting for the 27th. I'm not sure if I want the 8gb/128gb or the 6gb/64gb. I'm currently using a nexus 6p, so the minimum alone is doubling my ram and my storage. So I know that's all I really NEED. They both feature the same everything else. But, it's available with 2gb more ram, and 2x the storage. Sigh... What to do... I'm pretty sure I want the 8/128
IMHO go for the 6 GB/64 Gb vers. If you have more space u will find more junk to keep. 6/64 is more than sufficient for your purpose. If you are using it mainly for testing what will you do with all the extra space ?
I went with the 64gb model. I was about to order the 128 but after thinking about it, I realized that it is a complete waste for me . Between the fact that 6gb of ram is way more than enough and the fact that with everything being cloud based and streaming , there is just no need for the higher end model. I am using a phone with 4gb ram and 32 gb storage right now and not even close to maxing either one..
amathur2k said:
IMHO go for the 6 GB/64 Gb vers. If you have more space u will find more junk to keep. 6/64 is more than sufficient for your purpose. If you are using it mainly for testing what will you do with all the extra space ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I guess I'll go with the 64 GB one.
Super ! When you do purchase can you perform the following test for me.
1) Overload the phone with 20-25 open apps
2) Further load Chrome with 30 open tabs, several with embedded vidos
3) Now Launch a browser from inside another app (A RSS reader like feedly or even facebook / twitter) navigate within this browser till u find a page with videos (E.g. on techcrunch.com), play the video.
Now try to scroll up and down real fast, and see how the touch response is.
Thanks a ton.
Truestark said:
Yeah I guess I'll go with the 64 GB one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
amathur2k said:
Super ! When you do purchase can you perform the following test for me.
1) Overload the phone with 20-25 open apps
2) Further load Chrome with 30 open tabs, several with embedded vidos
3) Now Launch a browser from inside another app (A RSS reader like feedly or even facebook / twitter) navigate within this browser till u find a page with videos (E.g. on techcrunch.com), play the video.
Now try to scroll up and down real fast, and see how the touch response is.
Thanks a ton.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess the decision to go with base model 6/64 or higher end 8/128 should entirely depend upon personal use.
If your usual use case is operating 20-25 apps and 30 chrome tabs + games and storing tonnes of photos + videos, sure, go with higher end. However, my usage will not be as demanding as stated so will go with the base model.
This might sound crazy but for me, I simply preferred the appearance of the black one.
I'll be glad to have the 128gb ram - a couple of years ago this would have been really important to me - although with unlimited 4g data and cloud storage / music streaming etc. its less of a factor nowadays.
The difference in price points between the two is reasonable but the biggest draw for me was I wanted the black one.
Truestark said:
hahah sure but there are custom roms.. and who uses their phone over 2 years these days.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do, not exactly rich enough to buy decent pricey phones every 2 years. still using a 920 that i hope to sell on
I don't think it's crazy at all, the black looks stunning and a lot of people buy a specific phone because of how it looks. If I didn't always use a case, I would have gone for the black one as well.
I opted for the 64GB - I've filled it with the apps I use, I use Google Pics to store my photos online .... I have like 40GB left ....Didnt feel the need to pay more for something that I wasnt going to use ( ram or extra memory ) - also i prefer my grey