Hi
I just want to give you a forum user HTCMania, friend of XDA, has in his hand and owned the Galaxy Note 2, in this thread can follow the news and the questions that most people on the forum do.
You can see photos and videos, is 100% real, this person who had owned the Galaxy S3. He was the first to have it, two weeks before the official sale.
http://www.htcmania.com/showthread.php?t=451668
PD: If a moderator closes my post, which enter the reason and not close without saying anything. Is it for an alleged competition between forums? Censorship? I see a lot of news linking to other websites and blogs and it's okay to put source. I thought this encourages collaboration and information, if so, write the reason.
How does he get to own one? Where did he get it from?
DMax99 said:
How does he get to own one? Where did he get it from?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He says that a friend gets it for him, he can not tell anymore..
More videos..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paLgOxaT3UI&feature=plcp
http://youtu.be/Ht_TKj0nb1A
http://youtu.be/gNxCDos6RBE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=adiCch_sWKg
So wait, the GNoteII can record in slow motion like the Galaxy Camera? Hello golf swing analyzer!
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using xda app-developers app
Jcossack88 said:
So wait, the GNoteII can record in slow motion like the Galaxy Camera? Hello golf swing analyzer!
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OMG!!! Slow motion! I hope it is true. I want this phone so bad!!!
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Check out my huge collection of 64GB Samsung Galaxy Note 2 Videos (Demos, Accessory Reviews)
Jcossack88 said:
So wait, the GNoteII can record in slow motion like the Galaxy Camera? Hello golf swing analyzer!
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe he also has a galaxy camera?!
If he owns note 2 it's not that hard.
GT-I9000 cihazımdan Tapatalk 2 ile gönderildi
All of these companies have outside product testers. Back in 2006-2008 I used to product test Sony Ericsson dumbphones.
osazone said:
Maybe he also has a galaxy camera?!
If he owns note 2 it's not that hard.
GT-I9000 cihazımdan Tapatalk 2 ile gönderildi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I had originally thought....but he has videos showing the Gnote2 and the SIII. He would have showed the camera as well....but that's just my thought process
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app
First quadrant on note 2... :what:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ht_TKj0nb1A&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Shame to HOX lol
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2
msedek said:
First quadrant on note 2... :what:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ht_TKj0nb1A&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Shame to HOX lol
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really all that impressive. My GS3 gets 6200 at 1.6Ghz on Stock ICS ROM.
The Quad Core Krait is supposed to run about 7500.
Baldilocks said:
Not really all that impressive. My GS3 gets 6200 at 1.6Ghz on Stock ICS ROM.
The Quad Core Krait is supposed to run about 7500.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not fair... Make it stock on your sgs3 or oc the note2 to 2ghz (Wich sgs3 can not reach) then try again
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2
msedek said:
That's not fair... Make it stock on your sgs3 or oc the note2 to 2ghz (Wich sgs3 can not reach) then try again
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not fair? Think about it.
The Galaxy Note 2 has a 1.6Ghz Exynos 4, it should run just as fast as my 1.6Ghz Exynos 4 GS3. Not that hard to understand.
If you overclock the Note, what is that going to prove?? Nothing.
Baldilocks said:
Not fair? Think about it.
The Galaxy Note 2 has a 1.6Ghz Exynos 4, it should run just as fast as my 1.6Ghz Exynos 4 GS3. Not that hard to understand.
If you overclock the Note, what is that going to prove?? Nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can not compare an optimized custom kernel with stock kernel
Ocing note will prove the exact same thing you are proving Ocing s3
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2
msedek said:
You can not compare an optimized custom kernel with stock kernel
Ocing note will prove the exact same thing you are proving Ocing s3
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't HAVE a custom kernel. I am running a stock ROM/Kernel. I am using an app called Tegrak overclock. That's all it does.
So YES, you can compare them.
Baldilocks said:
I don't HAVE a custom kernel. I am running a stock ROM/Kernel. I am using an app called Tegrak overclock. That's all it does.
So YES, you can compare them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still you don't know under Wich conditions he performed the test... Anyways 6200/6000 same thing... Once again use tegrak on note 2 to get 2ghz and re run the test... Can you oc s3 to 2ghz? S3 its a good device I owned it..... But this its the best samsung phone to date
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2
msedek said:
Still you don't know under Wich conditions he performed the test... Anyways 6200/6000 same thing... Once again use tegrak on note 2 to get 2ghz and re run the test... Can you oc s3 to 2ghz? S3 its a good device I owned it..... But this its the best samsung phone to date
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you really not able to understand what I am trying to say?
The only difference is I have a ICS ROM and the Note is running a JB ROM. Given the fact that both are running the IDENTICAL processor at the same speed (in my case), they should score pretty much the same.
AnTuTu would be a better matchup.
Who cares about overclocking the Note 2, that has NOTHING to do with the point that's going over your head.
Baldilocks said:
Are you really not able to understand what I am trying to say?
The only difference is I have a ICS ROM and the Note is running a JB ROM. Given the fact that both are running the IDENTICAL processor at the same speed (in my case), they should score pretty much the same.
AnTuTu would be a better matchup.
Who cares about overclocking the Note 2, that has NOTHING to do with the point that's going over your head.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only thing you can do its do stock s3 to stock note 2 anything else does not counts.... This tegrak its third party stuff Wich adds extra stuff to the kernel so it's not equal conditions.... And you still have to post your 6200 quadrant picture proving it was on a GS3 stock + tegrak
Devices I own/ owned
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2
I was right, you don't understand.
Stock for stock is NOT what I am talking about. I am talking about both processors running at the SAME speed. How is that so hard to understand?
My point is, is that the benchmark the Note 2 is getting at 1.6Ghz, is lower than what my GS3 is getting at the SAME speed with the SAME processor WITHOUT any fancy kernel or ROM.
My head hurts now.
I know these benchmark tests are 'subjective' -- especially because of the difference between JB and ICS, but still. With each new generation of phones these scores have kept rising. With the new Krait S4 going into the 7500 range, these numbers aren't as impressive as they seem.
Baldilocks said:
I was right, you don't understand.
Stock for stock is NOT what I am talking about. I am talking about both processors running at the SAME speed. How is that so hard to understand?
My point is, is that the benchmark the Note 2 is getting at 1.6Ghz, is lower than what my GS3 is getting at the SAME speed with the SAME processor WITHOUT any fancy kernel or ROM.
My head hurts now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get your point bro.
this note maybe per release and final retail version may or may not score better.
PS.is OC possible without any additional modules?
Sent from my GT-I9100G using xda premium
Baldilocks said:
I was right, you don't understand.
Stock for stock is NOT what I am talking about. I am talking about both processors running at the SAME speed. How is that so hard to understand?
My point is, is that the benchmark the Note 2 is getting at 1.6Ghz, is lower than what my GS3 is getting at the SAME speed with the SAME processor WITHOUT any fancy kernel or ROM.
My head hurts now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So what's your point? That the S3 processor its better or something? Do you have the force GPU on developer section? That give you extra 200 points on quadrant... As I said we don't know under what conditions he performed the test... Take it as it is... Note 2 its twice better than s3 in everything
Rgb screen/faster processor/way bigger battery/spen/5.55" screen/2gb ram/slow motion cam/etc
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2
Related
It has been said on many sites that the I9100G has poorer performance, has only 1008 MHz max, etc.
While messing with the SetCPU setting, I found out that just keeping it enabled without overclocking at all (default settings) would make my I9100G get a very good score (6036) in AnTuTu, and it correctly shows 1200 MHz now, where it used to shows 800 MHz (it shows 1008 for some people).
The problem is that the I9100G seems to have a "bad" value sets by default to the scaling_max_freq, no matter what the governor is set to (even if I had the performance governor that should forces it to run at 1.2 GHz, it'd still run at a lower value than that).
For me it's being reset to 800000 every time for some reason, so the CPU rarely gets over 800 MHz value even if it needs to. I'm not sure if it's intentional or some sort of bug.
The value is in the following file:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
It looks like SetCPU fixes the problem because it automatically writes the max value the CPU supports in the file (1200000).
Whatever u do,u have a weaker CPU and much weaker GPU
Sent from my GT-I9100 on CM9 using Tapatalk
sahibunlimited said:
Whatever u do,u have a weaker CPU and much weaker GPU
Sent from my GT-I9100 on CM9 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I'm getting a higher score than some people do with an I9100 now.
_AnAkIn_ said:
Well, I'm getting a higher score than some people do with an I9100 now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think so
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
With cm7 I scored 6300+ both results without Overclock.
Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk
I dont think i9100G... my frined got an i9100 faced hang with with her photo album when the pic is more than 1000pics... but i cant saw mine G hang when in the same case... all got it own advantages.
---------- Post added at 12:58 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:54 AM ----------
iNeri said:
I don't think so
With cm7 I scored 6300+ both results without Overclock.
Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You try post in stock ROM and Stock kernel... and score again... i can sure G version can beat the i9100 in stock if in 1200mhz... u try notice the 2D and 3D score... i9100G always better than nonG version... this is just for ref.
serge327 said:
I dont think i9100G... my frined got an i9100 faced hang with with her photo album when the pic is more than 1000pics... but i cant saw mine G hang when in the same case... all got it own advantages.
---------- Post added at 12:58 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:54 AM ----------
You try post in stock ROM and Stock kernel... and score again... i can sure G version can beat the i9100 in stock if in 1200mhz... u try notice the 2D and 3D score... i9100G always better than nonG version... this is just for ref.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure mate. Now I'm on stock lph beta ICS rom, there's no custom kernel for ICS yet
New quadrant:
Count that our gpu is capped to 267 mhz for battery savings and to avoid overheating but we can easily clock it to 400mhz maxstock frequency of mali gpu with tegrak Overclock.
Obviously in older roms Antutu scores about 5800 points
Can somebody post the score of g version? For compare the 3D & 2D that you talking about
Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk
iNeri said:
Sure mate. Now I'm on stock lph beta ICS rom, there's no custom kernel for ICS yet
New quadrant:
Count that our gpu is capped to 267 mhz for battery savings and to avoid overheating but we can easily clock it to 400mhz maxstock frequency of mali gpu with tegrak Overclock.
Obviously in older roms Antutu scores about 5800 points
Can somebody post the score of g version? For compare the 3D & 2D that you talking about
Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is the i9100G in latest 2.3.6 KL3 with setcpu to 1200Mhz Quadrant 3D score 2607 (red circle) and antutu score... you try looking at the part 3D score in Quarant and Antutu 2D graphic score: 304 and 3D graphic score:1277(red circle).. always better than i9100...
Sent from my GT-I9100G using Tapatalk
iNeri said:
Sure mate. Now I'm on stock lph beta ICS rom, there's no custom kernel for ICS yet
New quadrant:
Count that our gpu is capped to 267 mhz for battery savings and to avoid overheating but we can easily clock it to 400mhz maxstock frequency of mali gpu with tegrak Overclock.
Obviously in older roms Antutu scores about 5800 points
Can somebody post the score of g version? For compare the 3D & 2D that you talking about
Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That not fair.. Using a Unfinished ICS rom to test XD
okie, its already discussed and concluded so many times I9100 > I9100G, end of discusssion. Do concentrate on Op question.
Here 6389 points stock rom with neak kernel.
Enviado do meu Galaxy S2 usando o Tapatalk
Benchmarks doesn't really mean anything. It's up to the real life performance and personal preference.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
bala_gamer said:
okie, its already discussed and concluded so many times I9100 > I9100G, end of discusssion. Do concentrate on Op question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont care so... up to you say i9100 > nvidia Tegra 3 also can... the words come from you, no one can stop your word...
Sent from my GT-I9100G using Tapatalk
Mmm weird. It seem this test are not accurate.
In quadrant g version show lower result meanwhile in Antutu g version scores a little bit more in 2D test.
3D test in Antutu its almost the same with 30 point in favor of the g version. Quadrant results shows a lower score for the no g version.
In processor test the g version wins in Antutu but lose in quadrant vs the no g version.
Another bench more accurate to test?
I think cf bench test how much java code can the phone execute.
Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk
serge327 said:
Dont care so... up to you say i9100 > nvidia Tegra 3 also can... the words come from you, no one can stop your word...
Sent from my GT-I9100G using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better develop your reading practice ....
bala_gamer said:
Better develop your reading practice ....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for my bad english...
Sent from my GT-I9100G using Tapatalk
bala_gamer said:
okie, its already discussed and concluded so many times I9100 > I9100G, end of discusssion. Do concentrate on Op question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems that serge already know how to fix it. See how much Antutu bench scores him in processor tests.
Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk
iNeri said:
Mmm weird. It seem this test are not accurate.
In quadrant g version show lower result meanwhile in Antutu g version scores a little bit more in 2D test.
3D test in Antutu its almost the same with 30 point in favor of the g version. Quadrant results shows a lower score for the no g version.
In processor test the g version wins in Antutu but lose in quadrant vs the no g version.
Another bench more accurate to test?
I think cf bench test how much java code can the phone execute.
Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here you go cf bench
Sent from my GT-I9100G using Tapatalk
Seriously you guys are comparing with benchmarks score? No need. 9100G only needs a diff subforum in XDA to help ppl from getting confused.
Its very subjective saying which one is better as there r loads of reason why scores r high and low and ppl usually shows their best luck score and not the super average benchmark result. If ur lucky that ur CPU could focus totally on the benchmark it should score very well when no mediascans or syncs, pushing/pulling and services.
And right on topic again, op discovered that its solved with SetCpu, so talk about it rather than arguing n stuffs. We all want to see SGS2 being good and superior. Hopefully this multi SOC issue wont happen again in SGS3 but prolly it will due to supply and strategy
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
I agree that there should be a separate forum for the 9100G. I got confused at first, too and flashed the wrong kernel
cycore said:
I agree that there should be a separate forum for the 9100G. I got confused at first, too and flashed the wrong kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree
Sent from my GT-I9100G using Tapatalk
Hey there,
i just used Antutu to benchmark my wildfire and was shocked that there were wildfires in the list that scored higher than 1200 points, how is that possible? i want that too
Anyway!
My current score:
907 Points
System:
- CM7 (JIT on, compcache off)
- max. 768Mhz (smartassV2)
- all data on internal space
- supercharged
gozzaa said:
Hey there,
i just used Antutu to benchmark my wildfire and was shocked that there were wildfires in the list that scored higher than 1200 points, how is that possible? i want that too
Anyway!
My current score:
907 Points
System:
- CM7 (JIT on, compcache off)
- max. 768Mhz (smartassV2)
- all data on internal space
- supercharged
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I run this test just because I was bored. But our phone is ''NOT'' in the list. Its a different phone called wildfire ''S''
But there are many ways that can improve your score on the app (Don't see the point tho as phone is so old and without gpu) try different gov's eg. Performance and you can get a faster sd card eg class 10 (as it collects points for sd reads and writes)
My Antutu score is 932
CM7 build 14 (I find it the most stable one out there)
CPU MAX 768
CPU MIN 748
PERFORMANCE Governor
Compcache 18%
JIT enabled
Surface dithering enabled
Purging of assists enabled
VM HEAP SIZE 32m
Sent from my CM7 powered HTC Wildfire.
Some Info
you can compare wildfires once you have benchmarked your own, under the ranking category, top at the mo seems to have a score of 6126 but that also has a CPU speed of 1200 MHz otherwise there are more realistic ones further down, but i mannaged 1087 score with my wildfire which is still on a stock ROM lol, but as stated SD card makes a difference, i have installed an 8Gb class 10 samsung and modified the cache. But none the less, i have a lot of apps and not much RAM free so i found my score supprising compared with other wildfires. And remember, benchmarks dont represent ability in day to day use or even heavy use, they just give a theoretical overview.
But if you do want to improve your wildfire with visible results and not just numbers, i would recommend some of the below
A Class 10 Memory Card
Increase the cashe size of the memory card (improves Read/Write) but not too far i have found problems at higher values apps like SD speed boost are nice
Task Killer, automatic ones are good and save you effort :L
Overclock and undervolt with a governor appropriate for your use, this gives massively improved performance on demand and save battery when that performance is not required
New ROM, athough i have not done this personaly there are many a report of speed improvements due to less bloatware on ROM's like cyanogenmod
Move apps to SD not so much a speed thing but if you have a fast card then it saves internal space with no loss in performance
Apps like Optimize toolbox, Set CPU and memory booster helped with these.
so i am sure if i flashed a new ROM i could get my score up to 1100 at least if not further and there are things i have not tried yet so i would not say a score of 1200 is out of reach and you could probably go further, but not 6126 as antutu seems to think :L
if there is anything i have missed please tell me and i will add to the list, hope this helps
Mine tested for fun as I don't give a monkeys about it.
HTC wildfire: LeWaOs
Too lazy to screenshot
Score: 856
ROM: KoolSense
CPU:352-710MHz interactive governor
Rempuzzle, 748-768 performance, however I normally use 176-768 conservative.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium
My total score was 958 using cm7 rc3
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium
Using Rempuzzle 2.71
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium
One S with Krait S4:
Was a little disappointed since my brother with a Sensation running Sense 4.0 got in the 7000's!
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
usaff22 said:
One S with Krait S4:
Was a little disappointed since my brother with a Sensation running Sense 4.0 got in the 7000's!
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Holy **** at that resolution O. O
Barely fits on my tablets screen in portrait mode.
Sent from my Ainol Novo7 Elf using xda premium
usaff22 said:
One S with Krait S4:
Was a little disappointed since my brother with a Sensation running Sense 4.0 got in the 7000's!
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice..........
Here's my s2 atm, I got 6200 ish before rooting and installing paranoid android rom so I've lost a bit on this benchmark.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
nejc121 said:
Holy **** at that resolution O. O
Barely fits on my tablets screen in portrait mode.
Sent from my Ainol Novo7 Elf using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What resolution is your tablet? This One S is 960*540 but the One X and Galaxy Nexus screenshots don't even fit on my laptop screen!
Scratch0805 said:
Nice..........
Here's my s2 atm, I got 6200 ish before rooting and installing paranoid android rom so I've lost a bit on this benchmark.
I think mine dropped after I installed many apps, during my "app rush" stage. That was when I was so crazy about apps since I had to limit myself on the Wildfire or I'd have to sacrifice one app to get another lol!
Maybe when I root this phone, after it gets Revolutionary S-OFF (Only option is HTCDev now which I don't trust) I can get TrickDroid or the unofficial CM9 Alpha10!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
My score: 1067
Oxygen 2.3.2 with Juwe Ram script
768-176 performance
normal i use 729-518 SmartassV2
score: 1062
usaff22 said:
What resolution is your tablet? This One S is 960*540 but the One X and Galaxy Nexus screenshots don't even fit on my laptop screen!
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's 1024x600
Here's it's benchmark.
And HTCDev ain't that bad.
Unlocked my dad's Evo3D and his coworker's Evo3D using that. :silly:
nejc121 said:
It's 1024x600
Here's it's benchmark.
And HTCDev ain't that bad.
Unlocked my dad's Evo3D and his coworker's Evo3D using that. :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The elf has cm9? Awesome. I might get one to replace my bricked T01.
Sent from my wildfire using xda premium
Justice™ said:
The elf has cm9? Awesome. I might get one to replace my bricked T01.
Sent from my wildfire using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's actually for the Novo7 Aurora, but the tablets are practically the same, save for the IPS display on the Aurora.
There's also a Ubuntu and ICS dualboot ROM, but that one does need a hardware keyboard atleast once (Just for the first login, you can get an onscreen one later)
Otherwise, the Elf II did come out recently, but that one doesn't have any ROMs yet :silly:
Seems my problem was the gpu was set to 276mhz Max, changed that to 400mhz and it jumps up a 1000+ points.
Scratch0805 said:
Seems my problem was the gpu was set to 276mhz Max, changed that to 400mhz and it jumps up a 1000+ points.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So was it underclocked at first or was it the stock clockspeed and you wanted to OC it?
It has a Mali 400 if I'm not mistaken, just downloaded ex tweaks to setup something else and noticed the Max gpu speed was 276 so it must have got underclocked somewhere along the way.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Hey guys
since i saw a lot of kernel for the beast N7100
and i think a lot of you may be asking which kernel to choose
i liked just to make a small comparison for those kernel via Antutu Benchmark
some of you care for the performance results, and some just want a balance Kernel
therefore i tested almost all kernel for the SAMMY based kernels and upload the pix for you
in this way you may get a better idea how might your phone look alike, But also you have to watch you Battery
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 1600 MHz
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 1800 MHz
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 2000 MHz
Correction for 2 kernel name, Perseus 1.36, and Redpill 1.47
It migt be not so important for you,
but if you think i helped you
please do not hesitate to click the Thanks button
alright but now do some tests for battery life, i think thats no1 reason what people want in custom kernel
use every kernel for few days with "normal" usage and do screenshots every day of battery and screen on time when batttery goes critical. i planned to do that but kinda lazy
also it would be good to do some recording of wakelocks on every kernel.
trpi said:
alright but now do some tests for battery life, i think thats no1 reason what people want in custom kernel
use every kernel for few days with "normal" usage and do screenshots every day of battery and screen on time when batttery goes critical. i planned to do that but kinda lazy
also it would be good to do some recording of wakelocks on every kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats indeed better, but me also cant make the test for battery...since i daily or every 2 days change a rom....my phone is not stable on any rom lol
Were these benchmark runs only once?
McLaren__F1 said:
Were these benchmark runs only once?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if u mean one test for kernel, then yes
good comparison.. which rom where u using while doing the testing??
also which baseband and build?
This is so completely irrelevant to anyone but you. A single run of benchmarks is in no way indicitave of a kernels performance.
Anyone making the decision to flash a kernel based solely on a screenshot of some benchmarks should just stick to stock and save themselves the hassle.
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium
fake_japanese_guy said:
good comparison.. which rom where u using while doing the testing??
also which baseband and build?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On alliance rom v3 dmc3 baseband xdkl7...when ur rom will be ready ?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
This is so completely irrelevant to anyone but you. A single run of benchmarks is in no way indicitave of a kernels performance.
Anyone making the decision to flash a kernel based solely on a screenshot of some benchmarks should just stick to stock and save themselves the hassle.
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So where is ur point?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
mrlove6 said:
So where is ur point?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My point is that the information you have provided is useful only to you and even then it isn't particularly useful.
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium
conantroutman said:
My point is that the information you have provided is useful only to you and even then it isn't particularly useful.
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe thats ur opinion..when benchmark and kernels are never important there was no need to invent the benchmark. ...anyway ill try to contact phonearena.com and gsmarena.com and tell them to stop testing phones on benchmark ( useless ) becuase u said so. Thanks for ur pass
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
it is interesting someone post a result with 3d score 863 for a note 2. do you know what that mean?
Means overclicking so much isnt good with this kernal...and as u see I think its the only one have low value
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
mrlove6 said:
Maybe thats ur opinion..when benchmark and kernels are never important there was no need to invent the benchmark. ...anyway ill try to contact phonearena.com and gsmarena.com and tell them to stop testing phones on benchmark ( useless ) becuase u said so. Thanks for ur pass
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They actually use repeatable tests. Or at least I hope they do. Not just you running the benchmark once...
If you want even a modicum of respect in the field of scientific testing, you'd have given the details of the ROM version in use, and also the process used to average the results over a number of executions.
Scientific tests are based across running one test multiple times without changing anything, as it increases the reliability of the results if they agree with each other.
Usually you can discount the lowest and highest result each time you repeat the same test, but then you need to average the remaining results. I'd expect that benchmarks should be normally distributed around the actual score.
mrlove6 said:
Hey guys
since i saw a lot of kernel for the beast N7100
and i think a lot of you may be asking which kernel to choose
i liked just to make a small comparison for those kernel via Antutu Benchmark
some of you care for the performance results, and some just want a balance Kernel
therefore i tested almost all kernel for the SAMMY based kernels and upload the pix for you
in this way you may get a better idea how might your phone look alike, But also you have to watch you Battery
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 1600 MHz
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 1800 MHz
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 2000 MHz
It migt be not so important for you,
but if you think i helped you
please do not hesitate to click the Thanks button
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got (1600Mhz) 1800+ score in AnTuTu ...without any junks i got 18500+
NEAK kernel...
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Which rom u r using ?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
Omega Rom v16+SaberKernel:good:
Wow your scores are pretty bad. I use to get 19,000+ with ARHD and Perseus kernel OC to 1.8Ghz and UV down to -50mv. However, I also realised that if you keep benchmarking repeatedly one after the other you will get lower scores due to built up of heat and other factors such as RAM usage. So the question is: How long did you wait between benchmarking a kernel and what were the precautions you took before initiating a benchmark run? And what was the average score of each kernel?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
bushako said:
Wow your scores are pretty bad. I use to get 19,000+ with ARHD and Perseus kernel OC to 1.8Ghz and UV down to -50mv. However, I also realised that if you keep benchmarking repeatedly one after the other you will get lower scores due to built up of heat and other factors such as RAM usage. So the question is: How long did you wait between benchmarking a kernel and what were the precautions you took before initiating a benchmark run? And what was the average score of each kernel?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if u take a look on the screenshots, u will see exactly the time and the average compared to the 3 oc 1600 1800 and 2000
Maybe re-run the test? Clear Memory, Kill apps before running each test?
Take the average of lets say 3 runs?
Hello guys a friend today bought a used nexus 4....I told him that this phone is really fast and nice.he has the galaxy note 2 and I told him that the s4 pro is as good as exynos and even better...so he did some benchmarks in quadrant it only scored 1400 and antutu 5.500.....so what's happening is there any change that he should make so it can run normally....is cpu underclocked?I don't Care about benchmarks but this was strange!
Sent from my HTC Droid DNA
Djmk4 said:
Hello guys a friend today bought a used nexus 4....I told him that this phone is really fast and nice.he has the galaxy note 2 and I told him that the s4 pro is as good as exynos and even better...so he did some benchmarks in quadrant it only scored 1400 and antutu 5.500.....so what's happening is there any change that he should make so it can run normally....is cpu underclocked?I don't Care about benchmarks but this was strange!
Sent from my HTC Droid DNA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it is warm performance go down. Try when it is "cold" and check if there is custom Rom/kernel.
Inviato dal mio Nexus 4 con Tapatalk 2
install 'system tuner' from the market and check cpu governor isn't set to 'power saviour' mode, if it is return it to on-demand
It was on demand I set it on performance in quadrant it did for a little good...but it never goes up from 20frames and it lags......I think its stock with stock kernel!
Sent from my HTC Droid DNA
Only 5.500 in antutu?
impossible. something is not right.
I got 21500 (PA rom with Semaphore kernel).
Ümit said:
Only 5.500 in antutu?
impossible. something is not right.
I got 21500 (PA rom with Semaphore kernel).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly!!!!its strange on performance it scores 7000...because he bought it for his girlfriend as a present he want it stock....but which Rom that is near to.stock and Kernel should I flash for maximum performance?
Sent from my HTC Droid DNA
CM9 Mods by MaceksMod (jacobmacek)
Nav Bar
Adds Navigation bar to bottom of screen
Download
Phablet UI
Enables Dual Pane, adds nav bar, allows lock screen rotation & allows all rotation (even 180).
Download
Allow Lock Screen rotation
Allows rotation of stock lock screen
Download
Allow all rotation
Allows all rotations, even 180 degrees (upside down)
Download
Pie Controls
Integrates LMT Launcher. Adds Button in settings named Pie Controls launching LMT. LMT icon is hidden from app drawer.
Flashable zip coming soon, if you would like to code the mod yourself, look here
Remap search button to bring up recent apps
Changes functionality of search button, launches recent apps rather than search.
Coming Soon...
Add recent apps button to status bar
A button to launch recent apps is added to to of status bar next to settings icon.
Coming Soon...
Settings in PhabletUI
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
reserved
You are a hero to the thunderbolt community sir! Thanks.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Does the nav bar mod allow for more than the home/recent/back options? Thanks for putting these together.
Sent from my skz_tenderloin using xda premium
Can't wait to use this mod... great work 2all....
Sent from my ThunderBump using xda premium
rrrrrrredbelly said:
Does the nav bar mod allow for more than the home/recent/back options? Thanks for putting these together.
Sent from my skz_tenderloin using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no, its just the stock navbar within the system ui, the search and menu soft buttons are inside of the system ui, just not linked to the navbar. so in theory, to add those 2 buttons, i would have to go to the xml files and copy the instance where the back button is but change all references to back/menu. I was going to focus most of my development time on these mods but the 3.0 kernel source was released yesterday so i am working on a custom kernel. This means fully working ics roms. I am adding overclocking to 1.9 ghz, and some governers, the usual stuff.
jacobmacek said:
no, its just the stock navbar within the system ui, the search and menu soft buttons are inside of the system ui, just not linked to the navbar. so in theory, to add those 2 buttons, i would have to go to the xml files and copy the instance where the back button is but change all references to back/menu. I was going to focus most of my development time on these mods but the 3.0 kernel source was released yesterday so i am working on a custom kernel. This means fully working ics roms. I am adding overclocking to 1.9 ghz, and some governers, the usual stuff.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most bolts can't handle over 1.5 GHz.
Sent from my Infected Rezound using Tapatalk 2
Dark Jedi said:
Most bolts can't handle over 1.5 GHz.
Sent from my Infected Rezound using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not without frying it lol.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
disconnecktie said:
Not without frying it lol.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the highest I have gotten it to go [while being ULV'ed] was 1.35Ghz
after being pushed any higher is would freeze and bootloop
really badly. This was when the Thunderbolt came
out and it still had Gingerbread with custom kernel.
I was able to get GB up to 1.6 by overvolting but like I said. You can fry it. Now if I go up that high it locks up instantly. Tbh oc up to 1.9 won't do you much good except drain the battery or screw the phone up permanently.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
disconnecktie said:
I was able to get GB up to 1.6 by overvolting but like I said. You can fry it. Now if I go up that high it locks up instantly. Tbh oc up to 1.9 won't do you much good except drain the battery or screw the phone up permanently.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree.
I think the only reason you should have it that high is the "wow factor"
Now having it Under-Volted just a smidge is what I have always used..
You can't actually screw up your phone from oc'ing it, only ov'ing. Worst case scenario, it gets hot, freezes, and reboots... And you're right where you were before. I'm running mine at 1766 right now, all of our processors handle over clocking differently
Edit: running steady at 1920
Edit: aaaand it froze haha. Test your CPU's limits, mines 1766, what's yours?
Dark Jedi said:
Most bolts can't handle over 1.5 GHz.
Sent from my Infected Rezound using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everyones processor has a different amount of wear and tear, the previous owner of my bolt never overclocked past 1.2 ghz so i can easilly run mine at 1.7 ghz stable, the option for 1.9 is there for those who can handle it
je2854 said:
the highest I have gotten it to go [while being ULV'ed] was 1.35Ghz
after being pushed any higher is would freeze and bootloop
really badly. This was when the Thunderbolt came
out and it still had Gingerbread with custom kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
must have been a cruddy kernel :/
jacobmacek said:
You can't actually screw up your phone from oc'ing it, only ov'ing. Worst case scenario, it gets hot, freezes, and reboots... And you're right where you were before. I'm running mine at 1766 right now, all of our processors handle over clocking differently
Edit: running steady at 1920
Edit: aaaand it froze haha. Test your CPU's limits, mines 1766, what's yours?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You indeed can ruin your processor running oc. It was intended to run at 1ghz and running oc at any level over what it was intended will shorten the life of if substantially. Lets not confuse people about that fact. It can be harmful for your processor.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
disconnecktie said:
You indeed can ruin your processor running oc. It was intended to run at 1ghz and running oc at any level over what it was intended will shorten the life of if substantially. Lets not confuse people about that fact. It can be harmful for your processor.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree that it can shorten the life of your processor and ware it but your statement made it sound like if you select anything over 1.5 will instantly kill your cpu. That can happen with computers but in android if its clocked too high for the cpu to handle, the kernel panic makes it reboot so your processor doesnt in fact "fry itself".
disconnecktie said:
You indeed can ruin your processor running oc. It was intended to run at 1ghz and running oc at any level over what it was intended will shorten the life of if substantially. Lets not confuse people about that fact. It can be harmful for your processor.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine runs at 1.2ghz stock, since the JB update. I believe that these cpus are actually meant to run at 1.2ghz, but were under-clocked when released. So running at 1.3 or 1.4 ghz is really not pushing it.
jacobmacek said:
must have been a cruddy kernel :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have always been an avid OC'er on any machine I have ever owned..
BUT just because -I- could not over-clock it higher didn't mean it was
a crappy kernel.. ALL phones are made differently no matter if it is the
same hardware profile or not...
kristoff123 said:
Mine runs at 1.2ghz stock, since the JB update. I believe that these cpus are actually meant to run at 1.2ghz, but were under-clocked when released. So running at 1.3 or 1.4 ghz is really not pushing it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
who's jb rom are you running?
htc set a performance lock for the ics kernel
kristoff123 said:
Mine runs at 1.2ghz stock, since the JB update. I believe that these cpus are actually meant to run at 1.2ghz, but were under-clocked when released. So running at 1.3 or 1.4 ghz is really not pushing it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had a Samsung Moment and found this information out
it was a stock stocked at 600Mhz SPRINT OC'ed it to 800Mhz and
it could be OC'ed to 1.12Ghz without it freezing or being unstable.
So I know exactly what you are talking about when you said this..