Database Users

Show your Antutu Score!

Hey there,
i just used Antutu to benchmark my wildfire and was shocked that there were wildfires in the list that scored higher than 1200 points, how is that possible? i want that too
Anyway!
My current score:
907 Points
System:
- CM7 (JIT on, compcache off)
- max. 768Mhz (smartassV2)
- all data on internal space
- supercharged

gozzaa said:
Hey there,
i just used Antutu to benchmark my wildfire and was shocked that there were wildfires in the list that scored higher than 1200 points, how is that possible? i want that too
Anyway!
My current score:
907 Points
System:
- CM7 (JIT on, compcache off)
- max. 768Mhz (smartassV2)
- all data on internal space
- supercharged
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I run this test just because I was bored. But our phone is ''NOT'' in the list. Its a different phone called wildfire ''S''
But there are many ways that can improve your score on the app (Don't see the point tho as phone is so old and without gpu) try different gov's eg. Performance and you can get a faster sd card eg class 10 (as it collects points for sd reads and writes)

My Antutu score is 932
CM7 build 14 (I find it the most stable one out there)
CPU MAX 768
CPU MIN 748
PERFORMANCE Governor
Compcache 18%
JIT enabled
Surface dithering enabled
Purging of assists enabled
VM HEAP SIZE 32m
Sent from my CM7 powered HTC Wildfire.

Some Info
you can compare wildfires once you have benchmarked your own, under the ranking category, top at the mo seems to have a score of 6126 but that also has a CPU speed of 1200 MHz otherwise there are more realistic ones further down, but i mannaged 1087 score with my wildfire which is still on a stock ROM lol, but as stated SD card makes a difference, i have installed an 8Gb class 10 samsung and modified the cache. But none the less, i have a lot of apps and not much RAM free so i found my score supprising compared with other wildfires. And remember, benchmarks dont represent ability in day to day use or even heavy use, they just give a theoretical overview.
But if you do want to improve your wildfire with visible results and not just numbers, i would recommend some of the below
A Class 10 Memory Card
Increase the cashe size of the memory card (improves Read/Write) but not too far i have found problems at higher values apps like SD speed boost are nice
Task Killer, automatic ones are good and save you effort :L
Overclock and undervolt with a governor appropriate for your use, this gives massively improved performance on demand and save battery when that performance is not required
New ROM, athough i have not done this personaly there are many a report of speed improvements due to less bloatware on ROM's like cyanogenmod
Move apps to SD not so much a speed thing but if you have a fast card then it saves internal space with no loss in performance
Apps like Optimize toolbox, Set CPU and memory booster helped with these.
so i am sure if i flashed a new ROM i could get my score up to 1100 at least if not further and there are things i have not tried yet so i would not say a score of 1200 is out of reach and you could probably go further, but not 6126 as antutu seems to think :L
if there is anything i have missed please tell me and i will add to the list, hope this helps

Mine tested for fun as I don't give a monkeys about it.
HTC wildfire: LeWaOs

Too lazy to screenshot
Score: 856
ROM: KoolSense
CPU:352-710MHz interactive governor

Rempuzzle, 748-768 performance, however I normally use 176-768 conservative.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium

My total score was 958 using cm7 rc3
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium

Using Rempuzzle 2.71
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium

One S with Krait S4:
Was a little disappointed since my brother with a Sensation running Sense 4.0 got in the 7000's!
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2

usaff22 said:
One S with Krait S4:
Was a little disappointed since my brother with a Sensation running Sense 4.0 got in the 7000's!
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Holy **** at that resolution O. O
Barely fits on my tablets screen in portrait mode.
Sent from my Ainol Novo7 Elf using xda premium

usaff22 said:
One S with Krait S4:
Was a little disappointed since my brother with a Sensation running Sense 4.0 got in the 7000's!
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice..........
Here's my s2 atm, I got 6200 ish before rooting and installing paranoid android rom so I've lost a bit on this benchmark.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

nejc121 said:
Holy **** at that resolution O. O
Barely fits on my tablets screen in portrait mode.
Sent from my Ainol Novo7 Elf using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What resolution is your tablet? This One S is 960*540 but the One X and Galaxy Nexus screenshots don't even fit on my laptop screen!
Scratch0805 said:
Nice..........
Here's my s2 atm, I got 6200 ish before rooting and installing paranoid android rom so I've lost a bit on this benchmark.
I think mine dropped after I installed many apps, during my "app rush" stage. That was when I was so crazy about apps since I had to limit myself on the Wildfire or I'd have to sacrifice one app to get another lol!
Maybe when I root this phone, after it gets Revolutionary S-OFF (Only option is HTCDev now which I don't trust) I can get TrickDroid or the unofficial CM9 Alpha10!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2

My score: 1067
Oxygen 2.3.2 with Juwe Ram script
768-176 performance
normal i use 729-518 SmartassV2
score: 1062

usaff22 said:
What resolution is your tablet? This One S is 960*540 but the One X and Galaxy Nexus screenshots don't even fit on my laptop screen!
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's 1024x600
Here's it's benchmark.
And HTCDev ain't that bad.
Unlocked my dad's Evo3D and his coworker's Evo3D using that. :silly:

nejc121 said:
It's 1024x600
Here's it's benchmark.
And HTCDev ain't that bad.
Unlocked my dad's Evo3D and his coworker's Evo3D using that. :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The elf has cm9? Awesome. I might get one to replace my bricked T01.
Sent from my wildfire using xda premium

Justice™ said:
The elf has cm9? Awesome. I might get one to replace my bricked T01.
Sent from my wildfire using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's actually for the Novo7 Aurora, but the tablets are practically the same, save for the IPS display on the Aurora.
There's also a Ubuntu and ICS dualboot ROM, but that one does need a hardware keyboard atleast once (Just for the first login, you can get an onscreen one later)
Otherwise, the Elf II did come out recently, but that one doesn't have any ROMs yet :silly:

Seems my problem was the gpu was set to 276mhz Max, changed that to 400mhz and it jumps up a 1000+ points.

Scratch0805 said:
Seems my problem was the gpu was set to 276mhz Max, changed that to 400mhz and it jumps up a 1000+ points.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So was it underclocked at first or was it the stock clockspeed and you wanted to OC it?

It has a Mali 400 if I'm not mistaken, just downloaded ex tweaks to setup something else and noticed the Max gpu speed was 276 so it must have got underclocked somewhere along the way.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

First user with Note II

Hi
I just want to give you a forum user HTCMania, friend of XDA, has in his hand and owned the Galaxy Note 2, in this thread can follow the news and the questions that most people on the forum do.
You can see photos and videos, is 100% real, this person who had owned the Galaxy S3. He was the first to have it, two weeks before the official sale.
http://www.htcmania.com/showthread.php?t=451668
PD: If a moderator closes my post, which enter the reason and not close without saying anything. Is it for an alleged competition between forums? Censorship? I see a lot of news linking to other websites and blogs and it's okay to put source. I thought this encourages collaboration and information, if so, write the reason.

How does he get to own one? Where did he get it from?

DMax99 said:
How does he get to own one? Where did he get it from?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He says that a friend gets it for him, he can not tell anymore..
More videos..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paLgOxaT3UI&feature=plcp
http://youtu.be/Ht_TKj0nb1A
http://youtu.be/gNxCDos6RBE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=adiCch_sWKg

So wait, the GNoteII can record in slow motion like the Galaxy Camera? Hello golf swing analyzer!
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using xda app-developers app

Jcossack88 said:
So wait, the GNoteII can record in slow motion like the Galaxy Camera? Hello golf swing analyzer!
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OMG!!! Slow motion! I hope it is true. I want this phone so bad!!!
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Check out my huge collection of 64GB Samsung Galaxy Note 2 Videos (Demos, Accessory Reviews)

Jcossack88 said:
So wait, the GNoteII can record in slow motion like the Galaxy Camera? Hello golf swing analyzer!
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe he also has a galaxy camera?!
If he owns note 2 it's not that hard.
GT-I9000 cihazımdan Tapatalk 2 ile gönderildi

All of these companies have outside product testers. Back in 2006-2008 I used to product test Sony Ericsson dumbphones.

osazone said:
Maybe he also has a galaxy camera?!
If he owns note 2 it's not that hard.
GT-I9000 cihazımdan Tapatalk 2 ile gönderildi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I had originally thought....but he has videos showing the Gnote2 and the SIII. He would have showed the camera as well....but that's just my thought process
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app

First quadrant on note 2... :what:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ht_TKj0nb1A&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Shame to HOX lol
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2

msedek said:
First quadrant on note 2... :what:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ht_TKj0nb1A&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Shame to HOX lol
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really all that impressive. My GS3 gets 6200 at 1.6Ghz on Stock ICS ROM.
The Quad Core Krait is supposed to run about 7500.

Baldilocks said:
Not really all that impressive. My GS3 gets 6200 at 1.6Ghz on Stock ICS ROM.
The Quad Core Krait is supposed to run about 7500.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not fair... Make it stock on your sgs3 or oc the note2 to 2ghz (Wich sgs3 can not reach) then try again
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2

msedek said:
That's not fair... Make it stock on your sgs3 or oc the note2 to 2ghz (Wich sgs3 can not reach) then try again
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not fair? Think about it.
The Galaxy Note 2 has a 1.6Ghz Exynos 4, it should run just as fast as my 1.6Ghz Exynos 4 GS3. Not that hard to understand.
If you overclock the Note, what is that going to prove?? Nothing.

Baldilocks said:
Not fair? Think about it.
The Galaxy Note 2 has a 1.6Ghz Exynos 4, it should run just as fast as my 1.6Ghz Exynos 4 GS3. Not that hard to understand.
If you overclock the Note, what is that going to prove?? Nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can not compare an optimized custom kernel with stock kernel
Ocing note will prove the exact same thing you are proving Ocing s3
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2

msedek said:
You can not compare an optimized custom kernel with stock kernel
Ocing note will prove the exact same thing you are proving Ocing s3
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't HAVE a custom kernel. I am running a stock ROM/Kernel. I am using an app called Tegrak overclock. That's all it does.
So YES, you can compare them.

Baldilocks said:
I don't HAVE a custom kernel. I am running a stock ROM/Kernel. I am using an app called Tegrak overclock. That's all it does.
So YES, you can compare them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still you don't know under Wich conditions he performed the test... Anyways 6200/6000 same thing... Once again use tegrak on note 2 to get 2ghz and re run the test... Can you oc s3 to 2ghz? S3 its a good device I owned it..... But this its the best samsung phone to date
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2

msedek said:
Still you don't know under Wich conditions he performed the test... Anyways 6200/6000 same thing... Once again use tegrak on note 2 to get 2ghz and re run the test... Can you oc s3 to 2ghz? S3 its a good device I owned it..... But this its the best samsung phone to date
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you really not able to understand what I am trying to say?
The only difference is I have a ICS ROM and the Note is running a JB ROM. Given the fact that both are running the IDENTICAL processor at the same speed (in my case), they should score pretty much the same.
AnTuTu would be a better matchup.
Who cares about overclocking the Note 2, that has NOTHING to do with the point that's going over your head.

Baldilocks said:
Are you really not able to understand what I am trying to say?
The only difference is I have a ICS ROM and the Note is running a JB ROM. Given the fact that both are running the IDENTICAL processor at the same speed (in my case), they should score pretty much the same.
AnTuTu would be a better matchup.
Who cares about overclocking the Note 2, that has NOTHING to do with the point that's going over your head.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only thing you can do its do stock s3 to stock note 2 anything else does not counts.... This tegrak its third party stuff Wich adds extra stuff to the kernel so it's not equal conditions.... And you still have to post your 6200 quadrant picture proving it was on a GS3 stock + tegrak
Devices I own/ owned
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2

I was right, you don't understand.
Stock for stock is NOT what I am talking about. I am talking about both processors running at the SAME speed. How is that so hard to understand?
My point is, is that the benchmark the Note 2 is getting at 1.6Ghz, is lower than what my GS3 is getting at the SAME speed with the SAME processor WITHOUT any fancy kernel or ROM.
My head hurts now.
I know these benchmark tests are 'subjective' -- especially because of the difference between JB and ICS, but still. With each new generation of phones these scores have kept rising. With the new Krait S4 going into the 7500 range, these numbers aren't as impressive as they seem.

Baldilocks said:
I was right, you don't understand.
Stock for stock is NOT what I am talking about. I am talking about both processors running at the SAME speed. How is that so hard to understand?
My point is, is that the benchmark the Note 2 is getting at 1.6Ghz, is lower than what my GS3 is getting at the SAME speed with the SAME processor WITHOUT any fancy kernel or ROM.
My head hurts now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get your point bro.
this note maybe per release and final retail version may or may not score better.
PS.is OC possible without any additional modules?
Sent from my GT-I9100G using xda premium

Baldilocks said:
I was right, you don't understand.
Stock for stock is NOT what I am talking about. I am talking about both processors running at the SAME speed. How is that so hard to understand?
My point is, is that the benchmark the Note 2 is getting at 1.6Ghz, is lower than what my GS3 is getting at the SAME speed with the SAME processor WITHOUT any fancy kernel or ROM.
My head hurts now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So what's your point? That the S3 processor its better or something? Do you have the force GPU on developer section? That give you extra 200 points on quadrant... As I said we don't know under what conditions he performed the test... Take it as it is... Note 2 its twice better than s3 in everything
Rgb screen/faster processor/way bigger battery/spen/5.55" screen/2gb ram/slow motion cam/etc
Enviado desde mi GT-P7500 usando Tapatalk 2

The best performance rom+kernel.

Hello guys.
I`m new to N7. I have installed Motley kernel and ParanoidAndroid. I`m wondering if i can get better performance on 1.6 Ghz. (14100 in Antutu-How much is your?)The kernel is perfect for me but i think ParanoidAndoid has not the best performance. Can someone suggest me a rom?

DeFcOn said:
Hello guys.
I`m new to N7. I have installed Motley kernel and ParanoidAndroid. I`m wondering if i can get better performance on 1.6 Ghz. (14100 in Antutu-How much is your?)The kernel is perfect for me but i think ParanoidAndoid has not the best performance. Can someone suggest me a rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
performance would depend on tbe kernel. trinity kernel is a performance kernel(since you brought up antutu, 16400 here). rom wise, rasbean jelly is a great rom to match up with a performance kernel.

simms22 said:
performance would depend on tbe kernel. trinity kernel is a performance kernel(since you brought up antutu, 16400 here). rom wise, rasbean jelly is a great rom to match up with a performance kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thx for your fast answer. I dont want to flash trinity kernel because i heard that it has worst battery life then motley(IDK if this true). Rasberry will be ok with motley?

DeFcOn said:
Thx for your fast answer. I dont want to flash trinity kernel because i heard that it has worst battery life then motley(IDK if this true). Rasberry will be ok with motley?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
rasbean jelly will be fine with motleys kernel. but id say that trinity is better on battery life

simms22 said:
rasbean jelly will be fine with motleys kernel. but id say that trinity is better on battery life
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I installed Trinity+Paranoid=3800 in quad.
On Motley+Paranoid=4700
Both on 1.6... Isn`t intresting?

DeFcOn said:
I installed Trinity+Paranoid=3800 in quad.
On Motley+Paranoid=4700
Both on 1.6... Isn`t intresting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you should figure out how to bench properly before comparing benchmarks. so no, not interesting. you get a wide variety of scores when you let the device scale. quadrant doesnt toll the cpu enough, and you might have only tested one or two cores at a lower cpu. rasbean jelly and trinity, isnt that intetesting :silly:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

simms22 said:
you should figure out how to bench properly before comparing benchmarks. so no, not interesting. you get a wide variety of scores when you let the device scale. quadrant doesnt toll the cpu enough, and you might have only tested one or two cores at a lower cpu. rasbean jelly and trinity, isnt that intetesting :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have 4 question : Does rasberry have tablet ui? How can i test the cpu at the max? Performance governor? (It does the same as intreractive) Why do you have such a high I/O score? I have about 1800. What vesion of N7 do you have? And you have 3 times better score at 2D.

OK 2D score boosted by enabling Force GPU rendering. What about I/O?

DeFcOn said:
I have 4 question : Does rasberry have tablet ui? How can i test the cpu at the max? Performance governor? (It does the same as intreractive) Why do you have such a high I/O score? I have about 1800. What vesion of N7 do you have? And you have 3 times better score at 2D.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. rasbean jelly does not have tablet ui
2. set the cpu at top speed for the highest and top speed for the lowest.
3. i prefer ondemand/deadline. performance governor is terrible.
4. turn off fsync for higher i/o(in the filesystem or with a cpu control app. i use the trimity kernel toolbox. and run the ext4 mount script for extra i/o(the trinity kernel toolbox automatically runs the ext4 mount script when opened the first time, but you need to disable fsync manually).
5. go to the devices main settings, developer options, enable force gpu rendering for a higher 2D score.
6. i have a wifi only n7, 16gb.
7. youll need an app to disable tegra hotplug and enable all four cores if you want to go that route. the kernel would have to support it. trinity does, im not sure about motley(i think it does too). many benchmarks dont toll the quadcore enough to get accurate results. so you have to make sure that all 4 cores are used.
8. you can overclock or underclock the gpu with trinity kernel also.

What file in system i have to edit to run a command when its booting. I remember it was hw_config.sh in GingerBread ROMs... But i cant find it now...

DeFcOn said:
What file in system i have to edit to run a command when its booting. I remember it was hw_config.sh in GingerBread ROMs... But i cant find it now...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you need init.d files to run scripts upon bootup. not all roms support init.d scripts(rasbean doesnt), but there are flashable mods to give roms init.d support.

Thank you a lot for the help. Now i have 6500 in Quadrant. You are a great man :angel:

DeFcOn said:
Thank you a lot for the help. Now i have 6500 in Quadrant. You are a great man :angel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
much better! :victory:

simms22 said:
much better! :victory:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't want to piss you off but can you post here your antutu benchmark screenshot where i can see the detailed score? I want to know where my nexus defeats coz i have only 13500.

DeFcOn said:
I don't want to piss you off but can you post here your antutu benchmark screenshot where i can see the detailed score? I want to know where my nexus defeats coz i have only 13500.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol @ pissing me off.. :angel:
my guess is that youre getting thermal throttled. find a way, like a fan, to cool off your device while benchmarking(dont stick it in a fridge as condensation in the device can ruin it). heres my last antutu..

simms22 said:
lol @ pissing me off.. :angel:
my guess is that youre getting thermal throttled. find a way, like a fan, to cool off your device while benchmarking(dont stick it in a fridge as condensation in the device can ruin it). heres my last antutu..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
620Mhz? LOL :laugh:

I have pretty same score. Only the CPU integer, floating point, 3D is lower. Probably because you're runing at 1.7 Ghz. Right?:cyclops:

DeFcOn said:
620Mhz? LOL :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DeFcOn said:
I have pretty same score. Only the CPU integer, floating point, 3D is lower. Probably because you're runing at 1.7 Ghz. Right?:cyclops:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea, 1.7ghz. with tegra hotplug disabled, all 4 cores running.
btw, a while back there was a 2ghz kernel which almost no one could run at 2ghz. i hit 8998 in quadrant, almost 9000!
---------- Post added at 06:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:36 PM ----------
found it, its not a jelly bean kernel though, wouldnt be compatible with recent roms.
lol

simms22 said:
yea, 1.7ghz. with tegra hotplug disabled, all 4 cores running.
btw, a while back there was a 2ghz kernel which almost no one could run at 2ghz. i hit 8998 in quadrant, almost 9000!
---------- Post added at 06:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:36 PM ----------
found it, its not a jelly bean kernel though, wouldnt be compatible with recent roms.
lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
45° that's is how hot your nexus? Mine never go higher than 37°

DeFcOn said:
45° that's is how hot your nexus? Mine never go higher than 37°
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yours gos hotter. are you looking at cpu temp or your battery temp? 37C is body temperature, its not hot at all. your cpu will get hotter even, 45C is cool for the cpu, especially when pushing it. i can easily get it to the cpu shutdown temp if i want to, cpu shutdown is at 100C. cpu temp you need an app to see, battery temp is listed in settings.

Kernels Performance

Hey guys
since i saw a lot of kernel for the beast N7100
and i think a lot of you may be asking which kernel to choose
i liked just to make a small comparison for those kernel via Antutu Benchmark
some of you care for the performance results, and some just want a balance Kernel
therefore i tested almost all kernel for the SAMMY based kernels and upload the pix for you
in this way you may get a better idea how might your phone look alike, But also you have to watch you Battery​
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 1600 MHz​
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 1800 MHz​
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 2000 MHz​
Correction for 2 kernel name, Perseus 1.36, and Redpill 1.47​
It migt be not so important for you,
but if you think i helped you
please do not hesitate to click the Thanks button ​

alright but now do some tests for battery life, i think thats no1 reason what people want in custom kernel
use every kernel for few days with "normal" usage and do screenshots every day of battery and screen on time when batttery goes critical. i planned to do that but kinda lazy
also it would be good to do some recording of wakelocks on every kernel.

trpi said:
alright but now do some tests for battery life, i think thats no1 reason what people want in custom kernel
use every kernel for few days with "normal" usage and do screenshots every day of battery and screen on time when batttery goes critical. i planned to do that but kinda lazy
also it would be good to do some recording of wakelocks on every kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats indeed better, but me also cant make the test for battery...since i daily or every 2 days change a rom....my phone is not stable on any rom lol

Were these benchmark runs only once?

McLaren__F1 said:
Were these benchmark runs only once?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if u mean one test for kernel, then yes

good comparison.. which rom where u using while doing the testing??
also which baseband and build?

This is so completely irrelevant to anyone but you. A single run of benchmarks is in no way indicitave of a kernels performance.
Anyone making the decision to flash a kernel based solely on a screenshot of some benchmarks should just stick to stock and save themselves the hassle.
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium

fake_japanese_guy said:
good comparison.. which rom where u using while doing the testing??
also which baseband and build?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On alliance rom v3 dmc3 baseband xdkl7...when ur rom will be ready ?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app

This is so completely irrelevant to anyone but you. A single run of benchmarks is in no way indicitave of a kernels performance.
Anyone making the decision to flash a kernel based solely on a screenshot of some benchmarks should just stick to stock and save themselves the hassle.
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So where is ur point?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app

mrlove6 said:
So where is ur point?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My point is that the information you have provided is useful only to you and even then it isn't particularly useful.
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium

conantroutman said:
My point is that the information you have provided is useful only to you and even then it isn't particularly useful.
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe thats ur opinion..when benchmark and kernels are never important there was no need to invent the benchmark. ...anyway ill try to contact phonearena.com and gsmarena.com and tell them to stop testing phones on benchmark ( useless ) becuase u said so. Thanks for ur pass
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app

it is interesting someone post a result with 3d score 863 for a note 2. do you know what that mean?

Means overclicking so much isnt good with this kernal...and as u see I think its the only one have low value
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app

mrlove6 said:
Maybe thats ur opinion..when benchmark and kernels are never important there was no need to invent the benchmark. ...anyway ill try to contact phonearena.com and gsmarena.com and tell them to stop testing phones on benchmark ( useless ) becuase u said so. Thanks for ur pass
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They actually use repeatable tests. Or at least I hope they do. Not just you running the benchmark once...
If you want even a modicum of respect in the field of scientific testing, you'd have given the details of the ROM version in use, and also the process used to average the results over a number of executions.
Scientific tests are based across running one test multiple times without changing anything, as it increases the reliability of the results if they agree with each other.
Usually you can discount the lowest and highest result each time you repeat the same test, but then you need to average the remaining results. I'd expect that benchmarks should be normally distributed around the actual score.

mrlove6 said:
Hey guys
since i saw a lot of kernel for the beast N7100
and i think a lot of you may be asking which kernel to choose
i liked just to make a small comparison for those kernel via Antutu Benchmark
some of you care for the performance results, and some just want a balance Kernel
therefore i tested almost all kernel for the SAMMY based kernels and upload the pix for you
in this way you may get a better idea how might your phone look alike, But also you have to watch you Battery​
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 1600 MHz​
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 1800 MHz​
All Kernels without modifications just flashed and tested with 2000 MHz​
It migt be not so important for you,
but if you think i helped you
please do not hesitate to click the Thanks button ​
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got (1600Mhz) 1800+ score in AnTuTu ...without any junks i got 18500+
NEAK kernel...
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium

Which rom u r using ?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using XDA Premium HD app

Omega Rom v16+SaberKernel:good:

Wow your scores are pretty bad. I use to get 19,000+ with ARHD and Perseus kernel OC to 1.8Ghz and UV down to -50mv. However, I also realised that if you keep benchmarking repeatedly one after the other you will get lower scores due to built up of heat and other factors such as RAM usage. So the question is: How long did you wait between benchmarking a kernel and what were the precautions you took before initiating a benchmark run? And what was the average score of each kernel?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app

bushako said:
Wow your scores are pretty bad. I use to get 19,000+ with ARHD and Perseus kernel OC to 1.8Ghz and UV down to -50mv. However, I also realised that if you keep benchmarking repeatedly one after the other you will get lower scores due to built up of heat and other factors such as RAM usage. So the question is: How long did you wait between benchmarking a kernel and what were the precautions you took before initiating a benchmark run? And what was the average score of each kernel?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if u take a look on the screenshots, u will see exactly the time and the average compared to the 3 oc 1600 1800 and 2000

Maybe re-run the test? Clear Memory, Kill apps before running each test?
Take the average of lets say 3 runs?

Possibility of GPU OC @ more than 487mhz?

Well, as we all know, the the Adreno 320 on the s4 pro is barely capable enough for our device's resolution.
A lot of new games like Dead trigger 2 and Dead effect are struggling to provide decent framerates. Over clocking the cpu does not improve
anything. (I disabled thermal throttling to ensure the processors are not being throttled down)
So, we do need more Graphics prowess.
If thermal problems will arise by doing so, why don't we just UC the cpu and OC the GPU? Then do a mild undervolt.
Well, do you guys think the same as I do?
Will you not find it awesome to see devs implementing GPU OC of more than
487mhz? Or is it just not possible hardware wise?
Let's all talk about it here.
EDIT:
It seems like Riptide GP 2 is struggling as well, and it's not even at max settings..

tiktakt0w said:
Well, as we all know, the the Adreno 320 on the s4 pro is barely capable enough for our device's resolution.
A lot of new games like Dead trigger 2 and Dead effect are struggling to provide decent framerates. Over clocking the cpu does not improve
anything. (I disabled thermal throttling to ensure the processors are not being throttled down)
So, we do need more Graphics prowess.
If thermal problems will arise by doing so, why don't we just UC the cpu and OC the GPU? Then do a mild undervolt.
Well, do you guys think the same as I do?
Will you not find it awesome to see devs implementing GPU OC of more than
487mhz? Or is it just not possible hardware wise?
Let's all talk about it here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How high fps do you get in dead trigger 2?
EDIT:
Just tried one level in that game, and the average FPS was 48.
Thats on stock cpu/gpu clock and no uv or ov, and with thermald enabled.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I also didnt see any sort of lags in it It didnt feal at all as the device was having problems having enough power in that game.

tiktakt0w said:
Well, as we all know, the the Adreno 320 on the s4 pro is barely capable enough for our device's resolution.
A lot of new games like Dead trigger 2 and Dead effect are struggling to provide decent framerates. Over clocking the cpu does not improve
anything. (I disabled thermal throttling to ensure the processors are not being throttled down)
So, we do need more Graphics prowess.
If thermal problems will arise by doing so, why don't we just UC the cpu and OC the GPU? Then do a mild undervolt.
Well, do you guys think the same as I do?
Will you not find it awesome to see devs implementing GPU OC of more than
487mhz? Or is it just not possible hardware wise?
Let's all talk about it here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wtf?!
the s4 pro is moar than capable.
yeah well on my Xperia Z (s4 pro too) there is a kernel with 627 mhz gpu oc, but for what?
This chipset only has a lot heating problems,no performance problems, nuff' more.
Gesendet von meinem c6606 mit Tapatalk

anders3408 said:
How high fps do you get in dead trigger 2?
EDIT:
Just tried one level in that game, and the average FPS was 48.
Thats on stock cpu/gpu clock and no uv or ov, and with thermald enabled.
View attachment 2351301
I also didnt see any sort of lags in it It didnt feal at all as the device was having problems having enough power in that game.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I forgot to mention that it is perfectly playable on default settings, try enabling the "Very high" settings from options and you'll understand why I made this thread in the first place. (on dead trigger 2 and dead effect)
Tommy-Geenexus said:
wtf?!
the s4 pro is moar than capable.
yeah well on my Xperia Z (s4 pro too) there is a kernel with 627 mhz gpu oc, but for what?
This chipset only has a lot heating problems,no performance problems, nuff' more.
Gesendet von meinem c6606 mit Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why don't you try download DT2 and repeat the steps above?
I assure you, the frame rates will be choppy enough for you to tone down the settings again.

Very high settings are clearly intended for a higher end phone then.

tiktakt0w said:
I forgot to mention that it is perfectly playable on default settings, try enabling the "Very high" settings from options and you'll understand why I made this thread in the first place. (on dead trigger 2 and dead effect)
Why don't you try download DT2 and repeat the steps above?
I assure you, the frame rates will be choppy enough for you to tone down the settings again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, everything smooth
But as i said i don't oen a find 5, only a z

Tommy-Geenexus said:
Nope, everything smooth
But as i said i don't oen a find 5, only a z
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That explains everything, go ahead and post at your respective device' forum.
batwingnz said:
Very high settings are clearly intended for a higher end phone then.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's why I've been telling that we need more gpu grunt. :silly:

Needs more grunt

batwingnz said:
Needs more grunt
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:silly:

tiktakt0w said:
That explains everything, go ahead and post at your respective device' forum.
That's why I've been telling that we need more gpu grunt. :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oc a mobile phone should never be done. There is a reason why Qualcomm limits the CPU and GPU to those MHz and since that is almost the only thing that will break the warranty on find 5 I really hope oc as high as that won't happens. I really think that the oc that's made for now is as high as it should be and future improvements needs to be found else where
Sent from my Find 5 using XDA Premium HD app

anders3408 said:
Oc a mobile phone should never be done. There is a reason why Qualcomm limits the CPU and GPU to those MHz and since that is almost the only thing that will break the warranty on find 5 I really hope oc as high as that won't happens. I really think that the oc that's made for now is as high as it should be and future improvements needs to be found else where
Sent from my Find 5 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the insight Anders!
I was just hoping to see a slight bump in mhz, 500-525mhz not 600+ or something.

tiktakt0w said:
Thanks for the insight Anders!
I was just hoping to see a slight bump in mhz, 500-525mhz not 600+ or something.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's way to much I think , stock GPU freq is 320 MHz iirc always remember its a phone , not a pc also the limitations will be the SoC at the end but it should be able to improve a bit without a higher freq, will test that game again later on to see what freq I can do at that settings
Sent from my Find 5 using XDA Premium HD app

anders3408 said:
That's way to much I think , stock GPU freq is 320 MHz iirc always remember its a phone , not a pc also the limitations will be the SoC at the end but it should be able to improve a bit without a higher freq, will test that game again later on to see what freq I can do at that settings
Sent from my Find 5 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! Please do.
Btw, isn't the stock clock @ 400Mhz???