http://www.gsmarena.com/dualcore_snapdragon_s4_confirmed_for_verizon_galaxy_s_iii-news-4244.php
SlimJ87D said:
http://www.gsmarena.com/dualcore_snapdragon_s4_confirmed_for_verizon_galaxy_s_iii-news-4244.php
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Att is getting the exynos quad-core version like Rogers.
Sent from my HTC One X on Leedroid's ROM v5.1.0.
This isn't a bad thing, but it is also underwhelming. Every high end phone released in the US markets has the same SoC. Software battles are not very interesting, at least to me. On ATT both of the high end Android phones are very similar in terms of hardware with the HTC One X arguably being better since it is already out and has a better screen. Not sure what samsung was thinking with putting out a phone with the same internals as a rival a couple months later.
ceo.mtcl said:
Att is getting the exynos quad-core version like Rogers.
Sent from my HTC One X on Leedroid's ROM v5.1.0.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And who said that Rogers is getting an Exynoes version... the only evidence was a ad generated by google... unless you have another source.
SlimJ87D said:
And who said that Rogers is getting an Exynoes version... the only evidence was a ad generated by google... unless you have another source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This ad banner...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Until something more concrete appears, I'm going with this from the article...
"Of course an ad banner is hardly conclusive"
http://www.androidcentral.com/ad-ba...y-s-iii-could-feature-new-exynos-chip-and-lte
From the New Orleans event. Note the use of the word "optimized."
“Samsung Mobile is planning a U.S. version of Galaxy S III, optimized for the fastest LTE and HSPA+ networks in the U.S., which will be available in the summer of 2012. Exact timing and retail channel availability is not being announced at this time. We believe the Galaxy S III is the most anticipated product in the 20-year history of Samsung Mobile; therefore, we will continue to share information as it becomes available.” – Samsung
This could play out two ways...
1) Samsung's developed a GSM LTE-capable version of the Exynos chip and it will be used everywhere it can be. In North America that would mean Rogers, AT&T, and Sprint. Since CDMA's so limited, the VZW SGS3 would likely use the S4 chip. T-Mobile would likely get S4 also because S4 supports AWS and when faced with the same choice in the SGS2 they went Qualcomm vs. developing their own AWS radio. If Samsung was going this route, there's no reason they wouldn't have said so at the UnBoxed event.
2) LTE and AWS SGS3's will all be S4. Either because Samsung didn't have time to integrate LTE, couldn't match the S4's fantastic battery life, or that it might actually be cheaper. Samsung builds great SoC's but they have no track record (yet) in radios. There were no repercussions (other than some customer disappointment) when Samsung went this route last time. Also, when they did, they waited until right up to launch to disclose that the U.S. market wasn't getting Exynos (except the non-LTE AT&T version).
I have no idea which way it'll go (and neither do any of you). I wouldn't bet odds in Vegas based on a misplaced banner ad.
If you think AT&T is going to fragment the sales/updates as far as one that is quad-core/hspa/3G and one that is Dual-Core/HSPA/LTE, you are mistaken. Ain't. Gonna. Happen.
There will be one model, one that is usable on the LTE network.
bbeelzebub said:
If you think AT&T is going to fragment the sales/updates as far as one that is quad-core/hspa/3G and one that is Dual-Core/HSPA/LTE, you are mistaken. Ain't. Gonna. Happen.
There will be one model, one that is usable on the LTE network.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah sure. Too bad that's not true with the SGS2 and the SGS2 Skyrocket....
SlimJ87D said:
Yeah sure. Too bad that's not true with the SGS2 and the SGS2 Skyrocket....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was last year. We're into the LTE (True 4G) era.
Regardless. I'll have fun watching some of you waiting on that Quad Core.
bbeelzebub said:
That was last year. We're into the LTE (True 4G) era.
Regardless. I'll have fun watching some of you waiting on that Quad Core.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, no evidence whatsoever that you will be getting a Exynos + 4G LTE radio with Verizon.
SlimJ87D said:
Yeah sure. Too bad that's not true with the SGS2 and the SGS2 Skyrocket....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That U.S. introduction of the SGS2 was one of the strangest launches ever. First, it took Samsung and the U.S. carriers six months after the UK launch to bring it to the U.S. Then all but the AT&T version were totally different phones based on the Asian Celox and SGS2's in name only. If you remember the launch event, the T-Mobile version was locked in a Plexiglas box and not allowed to be touched. VZW skipped the SGS2 entirely. On top of that, two weeks after it launched, AT&T announced the SkyRocket which was a Celox variant and closer to the other U.S. carrier versions. Samsung’s in a much more powerful position than they were last go round so hopefully the phones will be less molested and the introduction better synchronized.
When the OG SGS2 launched on AT&T they hadn't even lit up their first LTE city. It would be strange for them to launch another high-end HSPA+ phone with as fast as they are growing (and pushing) their LTE network. But, based on the SGS2 launch, anything's possible.
BarryH_GEG said:
That U.S. introduction of the SGS2 was one of the strangest launches ever. First, it took Samsung and the U.S. carriers six months after the UK launch to bring it to the U.S. Then all but the AT&T version were totally different phones based on the Asian Celox and SGS2's in name only. If you remember the launch event, the T-Mobile version was locked in a Plexiglas box and not allowed to be touched. VZW skipped the SGS2 entirely. On top of that, two weeks after it launched, AT&T announced the SkyRocket which was a Celox variant and closer to the other U.S. carrier versions. Samsung’s in a much more powerful position than they were last go round so hopefully the phones will be less molested and the introduction better synchronized.
When the OG SGS2 launched on AT&T they hadn't even lit up their first LTE city. It would be strange for them to launch another high-end HSPA+ phone with as fast as they are growing (and pushing) their LTE network. But, based on the SGS2 launch, anything's possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the transition to LTE was difficult for Samsung and satisfying their customers. Then having to design multiple variants on top of that some with the S3 and LTE radio and some without it.
It takes hours and hours of meetings, designing, quality control, etc. I could already predict all the trouble that all parties had to go through, Samsung, Sprint, T-Mobile etc. If it wasn't for our wide population, I wouldn't be surprised if Samsung said "the hell with the US" and just stuck with releasing one type, the international version for everyone else.
SlimJ87D said:
Again, no evidence whatsoever that you will be getting a Exynos + 4G LTE radio with Verizon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never claimed otherwise.
I think there is sufficient proof out that Verizon will be getting a Qualcomm S4, just like Sprint... just like AT&T..... just like T-Mobile.
bbeelzebub said:
I think there is sufficient proof out that Verizon will be getting a Qualcomm S4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Almost certain.
just like Sprint...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Likely as their CDMA/LTE like VZW.
just like AT&T.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Competely unknown.
just like T-Mobile.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Completely unknown but AWS is easier on S4.
Related
http://www.motoringcrunch.com/news/mobile-tech/10536-samsung-galaxy-s3-htc-one-x-quad-core
Rogers google ad states Quad-core Exynos + LTE, and since Rogers and AT&T use the same baseband for HSPA+ and LTE it would work for AT&T customers.
HaruSoul said:
http://www.motoringcrunch.com/news/mobile-tech/10536-samsung-galaxy-s3-htc-one-x-quad-core
Rogers google ad states Quad-core Exynos + LTE, and since Rogers and AT&T use the same baseband for HSPA+ and LTE it would work for AT&T customers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here's the sign-up page for updates:
https://www.rogers.com/web/content/samsung-galaxy-iii
I hope they don't mean "4G (version) & LTE (version)", rather both in the same phone. Very interesting though.
It's easy to find the Rogers ad on Google, just search for "Rogers" and "Samsung Galaxy S iii" etc. keywords in Google and it'll pop up.
The ad might have changed, though, because it's now saying "Samsung Galaxy S III | Rogers.com" not the previous "Samsung Galaxy SIII - 4G LTE & New Exynos Processor".
I'd be okay with two versions..I'm not super partial towards LTE but largely just because it isn't prominent in my area of Canada. I signed up for Bell updates. I wonder though, do these advertisements mean we could see this early June? Or even the end of May?
Most people don't seem to know that Samsung announced both versions would be in Canada.
http://mobilesyrup.com/2012/05/03/s...s-iii-launch-is-scheduled-for-summer-of-2012/
I would love to see this but someone in the Ad department probably just screwed up the ad...
I came across the below 'system diagram' of the Exynos 4 Quad processor on Samsung's website.
Does the block 'C2C LTE modem' (where C2C, I reckon, stands for chip-to-chip) indicate that Exynos 4 Quad is in fact LTE capable? Wish someone could shed some light on the matter.
Could this, in fact, be what the ad suggests (Quad core CPU + LTE)?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Source:
www.samsung.com/global/business/semiconductor/minisite/Exynos/data/Exynos4%20QUAD.pdf
Cheers!
@Zedd
The Exynos 4 Quad was always LTE-capable. The problem that people are speculating was getting it to work in North America.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
A reliable source of mine from Bell just yesterday told me that the SGSIII would launch around July 1st.
stere0xide said:
A reliable source of mine from Bell just yesterday told me that the SGSIII would launch around July 1st.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I suppose that falls in line with the "summer" release date Samsung quoted, but I was seriously hoping for an early to mid-June release.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
tietherope said:
Most people don't seem to know that Samsung announced both versions would be in Canada.
http://mobilesyrup.com/2012/05/03/s...s-iii-launch-is-scheduled-for-summer-of-2012/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not entirely accurate. You have to read between the lines:
We are also planning a Canada LTE version of Galaxy S III, along with the newly announced global variation, both of which are optimized for the fastest LTE and HSPA+ networks in Canada.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The realist in me interprets that as another Canadian LTE version using a non-Exynos processer, (as Samsung did with the Skyrocket/GS2 LTE), but that the global variation we all know now as the GSIII Quad Exynos will still work on our Canadian networks (HSPA+).
I would hope that the lack of contradiction on Samsung's part so far means that the new Exynos will work on our LTE networks, but I'm a bit anxious that the news won't be good when we find out in June.
Samsung did not specify that the Canadian LTE version would use the Exynos Quad, and if anything suggests that we are getting something without Exynos by specifying ours would be available "along with the newly announced global variation", which is the Exynos.
Also, since the first day that Google ad appeared, I have been unable to trigger it again. The only ads that I see now omit any reference to LTE or Exynos/Quad. Because it ceased almost immediately, I suspect someone was in a rush to prevent the misinformation from continuing.
This is not a good sign for those of us hoping for an Exynos version. I'd prefer a non-LTE Exynos instead of a non-Exynos LTE, because I'll be doing far be doing most of my data access via WiFi.
.Arkham said:
That's not entirely accurate. You have to read between the lines:
The realist in me interprets that as another Canadian LTE version using a non-Exynos processer, (as Samsung did with the Skyrocket/GS2 LTE), but that the global variation we all know now as the GSIII Quad Exynos will still work on our Canadian networks (HSPA+).
I would hope that the lack of contradiction on Samsung's part so far means that the new Exynos will work on our LTE networks, but I'm a bit anxious that the news won't be good when we find out in June.
Samsung did not specify that the Canadian LTE version would use the Exynos Quad, and if anything suggests that we are getting something without Exynos by specifying ours would be available "along with the newly announced global variation", which is the Exynos.
Also, since the first day that Google ad appeared, I have been unable to trigger it again. The only ads that I see now omit any reference to LTE or Exynos/Quad. Because it ceased almost immediately, I suspect someone was in a rush to prevent the misinformation from continuing.
This is not a good sign for those of us hoping for an Exynos version. I'd prefer a non-LTE Exynos instead of a non-Exynos LTE, because I'll be doing far be doing most of my data access via WiFi.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not following what you are saying. I said that both the S4 LTE version and non LTE Exynos version will be in Canada. I don't really see anything you said proving that wrong.
tietherope said:
I'm not following what you are saying. I said that both the S4 LTE version and non LTE Exynos version will be in Canada. I don't really see anything you said proving that wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me put it this way: The global (Exynos LTE) version will most likely not be "available here", e.g. available from Rogers or similar LTE carriers. The press release said the global version would work on HSPA+ in Canada, so you could buy it outright somewhere else and use it here. E.g. Overseas. If Exynos LTE doesn't work on our carriers' LTE networks, we won't get that version. If a carrier wants to bring the global version here for non-LTE use, that would be fantastic, but nothing in the quote confirms that.
As I said, that's reading between the lines, because Samsung did not specify that the Exynos/"global version" would be "available here" (ie. from carriers like Rogers.)
Hell, I can pick up any phone from an importer, but that's not the same as Samsung making it available to consumers through official channels.
I'd be ecstatic if this phone came to ATT packing a quad-core. Not getting my hopes up though and I'm expecting the Snapdragon, wonder why they dont put the Exynos Dual-Core processor in it.
Indulge me.
The Korean SGS3 comes with 2GB RAM and the quadcore Exynos 4412 chip:
http://phandroid.com/2012/06/08/sk-telecoms-galaxy-s-iii-merges-quad-core-cpu-and-2gb-ram/
South Korea uses 2100Mhz HSPA band - as does the UK where I live.
http://www.worldtimezone.com/gsm.html
What's stopping me from (somehow) buying a Korean one and importing it for use here in the UK?
Also, any ideas how I would even go about buying something from Korea??
setspeed said:
Indulge me.
The Korean SGS3 comes with 2GB RAM and the quadcore Exynos 4412 chip:
http://phandroid.com/2012/06/08/sk-telecoms-galaxy-s-iii-merges-quad-core-cpu-and-2gb-ram/
South Korea uses 2100Mhz HSPA band - as does the UK where I live.
http://www.worldtimezone.com/gsm.html
What's stopping me from (somehow) buying a Korean one and importing it for use here in the UK?
Also, any ideas how I would even go about buying something from Korea??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Willing to bet, the Korean version won't use a Micro-Sim that GSM carriers use, as they're network SK Telecom if i recall does not require the use of sim cards. Also chances are the Korean version will be locked to region specific carriers there.
Don't go for it. Their will be a lot of issues with it. Also very bad developer support, worse than American version.
There may be other hardware compatibility issues with your network.
Sent from Rooted debloated stock Galaxy S3 OG I9300
Can't you just buy off-contract sim-free handsets, like you could here in the UK? Not attached/locked to a network?
setspeed said:
Can't you just buy off-contract sim-free handsets, like you could here in the UK? Not attached/locked to a network?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
His point is quad core and two gb ram. I understand his itch. Only that phone can scratch it.
Sent from Rooted debloated stock Galaxy S3 OG I9300
ceo.mtcl said:
His point is quad core and two gb ram. I understand his itch. Only that phone can scratch it.
Sent from Rooted debloated stock Galaxy S3 OG I9300
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For now lol
doeboy711 said:
For now lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The next Nexus better have a quad with 2gb of ram!!!
djkinetic said:
Willing to bet, the Korean version won't use a Micro-Sim that GSM carriers use, as they're network SK Telecom if i recall does not require the use of sim cards. Also chances are the Korean version will be locked to region specific carriers there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quite a lot of the new smartphones in Korea come with usim cards..
Don't ask me the finer details.
There are 3 major carriers in SK, two of them operate WCDMA networks.
I would not go for this phone. Like somebody else said, bad developer support.
ceo.mtcl said:
Don't go for it. Their will be a lot of issues with it. Also very bad developer support, worse than American version.
There may be other hardware compatibility issues with your network.
Sent from Rooted debloated stock Galaxy S3 OG I9300
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are saying that American version is going to have bad development support, when it's most likely going to be better.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk 2
I got an international one today and it's on at&t in the states. It's not running at hspa+ speeds though
Sent from my GT-I9300 using XDA
zion4887 said:
I got an international one today and it's on at&t in the states. It's not running at hspa+ speeds though
Sent from my GT-I9300 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
check to make sure your APN is set to phone
zion4887 said:
I got an international one today and it's on at&t in the states. It's not running at hspa+ speeds though
Sent from my GT-I9300 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You must not be having god connection then.
Here are my hspa speeds
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from Rooted debloated stock Galaxy S3 OG I9300
ceo.mtcl said:
You must not be having god connection then.
Here are my hspa speeds
Sent from Rooted debloated stock Galaxy S3 OG I9300
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why are you using an app to display battery life. You know the S3 has that built into stock now right?
If I have assisted you, please press Thanks button.
ok so i want the international version, my carrier (h2o wireless) runs on att but they dont have 4g only 3g... my question is , would it work on my carrier?
Haha!
ronj1986 said:
Why are you using an app to display battery life. You know the S3 has that built into stock now right?
If I have assisted you, please press Thanks button.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean that ugly stock battery percentage that appears next to the battery icon and takes up additional space? If you have noticed, I do not have any app but actually a circles mod that can display battery percentage within the battery icon.
For the dev support I disagree, it seems they will get the same hardware as the int version only more ram and LTE support so int roms shouln'd be hard to port, am I wrong?
djkinetic said:
Willing to bet, the Korean version won't use a Micro-Sim that GSM carriers use, as they're network SK Telecom if i recall does not require the use of sim cards. Also chances are the Korean version will be locked to region specific carriers there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Speaking form experience the SIM card issue is no longer a problem, Korean phones now use SIM cards, all carriers here ( SK, KT, LG all use SIM cards)
All Android phones here as of today (SGS3 is still unknown) are sold carrier unlocked, I've used my Korean issue GalaxyS (m110s) in various countries with no issue (India/China/UK)
Problem with the Korean version is that' you'll lose FM functionality and gain a useless DMB (TV) chip instead, also it's dimensions are ever slightly larger, so getting nice cases might be slightly harder, or you'll have to order from Korea, not impossible though.
Phones can be bought off the shelf here, they're just more expensive than in Europe/US
I'm pretty sure the american version dev support will be just as good as the international.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
POST ALL NOTE 2 RELATED COMMENTS HERE ONLY
TO ALL IN THE FORUM POST YOUR NOTE-2 RELATED COMMENTS/ DISCOVERIES HERE ONLY ALL OTHER THREADS WILL BE CLOSED AND/OR DELETED...
..........THANK YOU ~~~ oka1...
Other closed threads
Here is the link to the closed thread by
xpprofessional1
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1843238
Any news on a official release date for tmobile?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Looks like Tmo News is reporting that the user agent for the Note 2, for T-Mobile, has leaked. They're reporting that the device will be keeping its Exynos processor and will be HSPA+ 42Mbps. I'm guessing this will launch near the end of the year. The model number is SGH-T889.
Third Strike said:
Looks like Tmo News is reporting that the user agent for the Note 2, for T-Mobile, has leaked. They're reporting that the device will be keeping its Exynos processor and will be HSPA+ 42Mbps. I'm guessing this will launch near the end of the year. The model number is SGH-T889.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im tempted to get the note 2 but i hate that physical button. ..plus i know all the mods from the note 2 will be ported over to the note 1. ..that extra ram and processor is great though
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Third Strike said:
Looks like Tmo News is reporting that the user agent for the Note 2, for T-Mobile, has leaked. They're reporting that the device will be keeping its Exynos processor and will be HSPA+ 42Mbps. I'm guessing this will launch near the end of the year. The model number is SGH-T889.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so, does this mean the note 2 will actually work with T-Mobile's 4G network?
I currently have the original note and it only works on 2G. If the Note 2 will work on Tmo's 4G it will be enough for me to upgrade.
For all those AT&T User's
AT&T Galaxy Note 2 Confirmed In Leaked Screenshots – Release Imminent
It looks like were in for a treat guys. Samsung has gotten their act together and patched up everything in their latest quad-core.
Meaning...
Were gettin Quad-Core (Exynos 4412) with LTE
We had little-to-no-doubt the device would eventually make its way to AT&T (international frequency bands mostly match AT&T’s) but what’s interesting is Samsung’s quad-core Exynos 4412 is seemingly intact. No dual-core Qualcomm to be found. Remember, the last Note (and even the Galaxy S3) had to switch to a Qualcomm chip for compatibility with AT&T’s 4G LTE. Looks like Samsung patched everything up in their latest quad-core.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
EDT; This also applies for T-Mobile, Sprint users
seeking said:
so, does this mean the note 2 will actually work with T-Mobile's 4G network?
I currently have the original note and it only works on 2G. If the Note 2 will work on Tmo's 4G it will be enough for me to upgrade.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I run t-mobile 4g on my i717
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Xparent SkyBlue Tapatalk 2
how funny that its being released on about the same time as my birthday
seeking said:
so, does this mean the note 2 will actually work with T-Mobile's 4G network?
I currently have the original note and it only works on 2G. If the Note 2 will work on Tmo's 4G it will be enough for me to upgrade.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It looks like Samsung got their act together to were we will see a quad-core phone play nicely along 4G LTE
This is whats is going to get me to wait until AT&T gets its.
seeking said:
so, does this mean the note 2 will actually work with T-Mobile's 4G network?
I currently have the original note and it only works on 2G. If the Note 2 will work on Tmo's 4G it will be enough for me to upgrade.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your current Note, and the international Note II, will eventually work on T-Mobile's 3G/HSPA+ network by the end of this year, or early next, in some of the major markets in the States. T-Mobile is reframing their 1900MHz band, to work on 3G/HSPA+. I don't think the international Note II has the AWS bands inside of it, but I'm sure the T-Mobile one will.
In other words, you'll get some coverage with the International Note II in some of the major markets in the US, but you'll get even better coverage with the T-Mobile version, since it'll support both AWS/1700MHz and PCS/1900MHz. The good thing now, unlike the Galaxy S III, is that you'll still have the Exynos quad-core processor, instead of the Qualcomm dual-core processor (based on the rumors). The one thing I'm still wondering is if they'll still keep the LTE antenna in for the T-Mobile version. Would be nice, since they should be launching their LTE network next Spring.
Canadian Version?
I know they announced the quadcore version, but when it comes to Canada, will it be dualcore again? Or is it staying?
[email protected] said:
I know they announced the quadcore version, but when it comes to Canada, will it be dualcore again? Or is it staying?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Based on the info that the AT&T and T-Mobile models will still have the quad-core processor, I will say yes that the Canadian models should have them as will. This was the case for the S III, so it should still apply here.
Third Strike said:
Based on the info that the AT&T and T-Mobile models will still have the quad-core processor, I will say yes that the Canadian models should have them as will. This was the case for the S III, so it should still apply here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The US Variants of the SIII are dual-cores (Snapdragons S4..... correct me if i am wrong). Anyways we should see the Quad-Core CPU bundled with LTE:good::laugh::victory:
I am waiting for the Verizon vatiant and kts specs...
slicingtaco said:
The US Variants of the SIII are dual-cores (Snapdragons S4..... correct me if i am wrong). Anyways we should see the Quad-Core CPU bundled with LTE:good::laugh::victory:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know. I was referring to the fact that the AT&T and T-Mobile models were used in Canada.
ronaldheld said:
I am waiting for the Verizon vatiant and kts specs...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope there will be a Verizon variant
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Glad to see Samsung got all their s--- together now. Here's to hoping that they being manufacturer of their own chips (lte), panels, memory will lead them to dominate apple. the near uniformity of gs3 paid off for them, now that this is no different than the international version this should be the trump that sammy needs!
juanzr1 said:
I hope there will be a Verizon variant
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Edit: nvm
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2
I guess the note 2 is coming end of September
http://blog.handtec.co.uk/2012/09/1...alaxy-note-2-expected-release-28th-sept-2012/
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
Hope this is true! :good:
Yeah, you read it right. “Gigantaphablet” is for the phablets that are – quite simply – gigantic. At least that’s what they should be called. Samsung’s Galaxy Tab PRO 8.4 is one such device. And if leaks are to be believed, it could be making its way to T-Mobile. Or at the very least, released in a T-Mo friendly LTE model.
Leaked by TK Tech News, the device is shown picking up T-Mobile’s signal, and has “Voicemail”. So, it’s a phone. Remarkable.
http://www.tmonews.com/2014/05/samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-8-4-gigantaphablet-shown-working-on-t-mobile/
kable said:
So, it’s a phone. Remarkable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really. Everywhere else in the world 3/4G Samsung tablets have always been voice enabled. The U.S. carriers have always stripped out the functionality on the tablets they sell. It's never really made a lot of sense actually because they'd make more money by a tablet being added to a plan as a "smartphone" to gain access to voice/MMS features. My SM-P601 on AT&T.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
That was a quote from the article and im pretty sure he was being sarcastic... :/
Sent from my C6806 using Tapatalk
These 7.0 and up are original Phablets.
I honestly dont understand why ppl started calling these Galaxy Note 1/2/ & 3 Phablets, cause technically the first Generation 7' Galaxy Tabs where the phablets, I have the Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4 T325/LTE and its an Unlocked phone, voice and all. Now thats a Phablet... The pic I Posted is MY PHABLET... And i LOVE IT..
kable said:
Hope this is true! :good:
Yeah, you read it right. “Gigantaphablet” is for the phablets that are – quite simply – gigantic. At least that’s what they should be called. Samsung’s Galaxy Tab PRO 8.4 is one such device. And if leaks are to be believed, it could be making its way to T-Mobile. Or at the very least, released in a T-Mo friendly LTE model.
Leaked by TK Tech News, the device is shown picking up T-Mobile’s signal, and has “Voicemail”. So, it’s a phone. Remarkable.
http://www.tmonews.com/2014/05/samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-8-4-gigantaphablet-shown-working-on-t-mobile/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have my t325 on t-mobile too. Unfortunately t-mobile here SUCKS but I need a connection to blue tooth my Verizon towered straight talk phones Internet over. So it's worth the $10 a month I pay.
Sent from my SM-T325 using XDA Free mobile app
kable said:
Hope this is true! :good:
Yeah, you read it right. “Gigantaphablet” is for the phablets that are – quite simply – gigantic. At least that’s what they should be called. Samsung’s Galaxy Tab PRO 8.4 is one such device. And if leaks are to be believed, it could be making its way to T-Mobile. Or at the very least, released in a T-Mo friendly LTE model.
Leaked by TK Tech News, the device is shown picking up T-Mobile’s signal, and has “Voicemail”. So, it’s a phone. Remarkable.
http://www.tmonews.com/2014/05/samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-8-4-gigantaphablet-shown-working-on-t-mobile/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The lte versions of the tab pro should all work on T-Mobile with the exception that they only support hspa. I'm using a sm-t525 on T-Mobile and have made calls on it.
Why not LTE?
Sent from my SM-T325 using XDA Free mobile app
efanatic said:
Why not LTE?
Sent from my SM-T325 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The lte devices don't have the bands used in the USA for lte.
Well that sucks
Sent from my SM-T325 using XDA Free mobile app
The 8.4 mentioned in the first post does have US LTE bands according to the guy that originally posted about it on his blog.
Sent from my C6833_GPe using Tapatalk
Tmobile LTE Support in US
crpalmer said:
The lte devices don't have the bands used in the USA for lte.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I called T-Mobile tech support and they claim that the frequencies listed in the specs for the "phone" would work on LTE here in the US. Sure hope they are right.
CaveCreeker said:
So I called T-Mobile tech support and they claim that the frequencies listed in the specs for the "phone" would work on LTE here in the US. Sure hope they are right.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what I can tell, the device does not support AWS band 4 (1700/2100) on LTE so I don't think it will work on their refarmed network.
I do see that it supports 1900 MHz PCS so you should be able to get H+ (non LTE "4G") in an area that's refarmed.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. This is the only thing holding me back from buying it right now...
Sent from my SGH-M919 using XDA Premium HD app
Yeah I went to Chesapeake VA. Which is mostly a 4G area. I only got H+ . So I take it you guys are right, this tablet doesn't work on t-mobile's 4G network
Sent from my SM-T325 using XDA Free mobile app
A voice version with US LTE bands has not been released yet.
Sent from my C6833_GPe using Tapatalk
kable said:
A voice version with US LTE bands has not been released yet.
Sent from my C6833_GPe using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guess we will have to wait until if "officially" gets released by T-Mobile here in the states. I thought I read an article somewhere saying that when they did release it, it would be re-worked for 4G LTE. I just hope they truly include the voice capability or else I have no interest.
I was noticing 2100 MHz but not 1700/2100 is listed as supported. I'm probably going to wait for a Nexus 8 device at this point to get LTE (have a Nexus 7 and a Note 10.1(2014) in the household at the moment) but still holding onto this (or the Note S 8.4 that appears to have the same bands) as an option if we don't get a Nexus 8 LTE by the end of 2014.
Yes, what has been posted is CORRECT.
i am also running my T325 on T-Mobile, and I have a Unlimited LTE Plan with the carrier, However the Highest i have gotten on my PHABLET is H+, and on my Note 3 i get FULL LTE, so with that said these PHABLETS DO NOT have ACSESS to the LTE Band. Futher more, when i purchased the device in the US the Company that sold it to me was Honest enough to tell me that I WILL NOT be getting LTE in the US, that only over Seas receive LTE. I was upset but bought it anyway for the simple fact that I have the Note 3 and was Buying it to use it through Wifi cause i have my Note 3 set up with Unlimited Tethering without my carrier knowing a thing ( ), I also figured why Buy the Tab Wifi only when i have the option to get Voice + Wifi for a few more Bucks, Makes CENTS to me, just in case i loose or Brake my Note 3 I have a Backup with My Lovely Galaxy Tab Pro T325. Its a Win Win if you ask me, and when I do use it as a phone (With OUT a Bluetooth, or Headset) PPL be like WTF, is it really a Phone, and start asking mr 50,000 questions, so you will be surprised how many ppl would be willing to use this device as a phone, i know i can care less what ppl say, I CANTTT use them small A$$ Apple devices, just CANTTT do. Just had to throw my 2 Cents out there, Bless to Everyone, One Love..... :cyclops: :cyclops: :cyclops: P.S Theres a GREAT Custom Rom out for our T325, Ive been running it for Bout 5 days now and its 150% better than Stock, Big Up to the Developer ---> Genius319 "YOUR the MAN..!!! Here is the link:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...rom-pootis-rom-deodexed-zipalingined-t2853454
crpalmer said:
The lte devices don't have the bands used in the USA for lte.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for the late zombie reply but -
Even as far back as 2 years ago, one could port international devices' radios onto U.S. devices. With that in mind, I'm kind of surprised someone hasn't been able to d o that for the international (8") Tab S & Pro models ... especially this far out into these models life spans. We've had the SM-T325 on T-Mo for over a half year, & so we're no longer hopefull LTE radios will ever find their way onto the international versions. This far out into Tab S & Pro - ATT/T-Mo have STILL shown no interest to release a true phone enabled/LTE model. Samsung really seems to be stepping on their own crank. Between KNOX - no micro SD card slots ... non-removable batteries on their newest products ... who wants these new devices? It's really lame marketing . But I do like their teeny bezel ... so hspa+ Tab pro it is
.
hillg001 said:
Sorry for the late zombie reply but -
Even as far back as 2 years ago, one could port international devices' radios onto U.S. devices. With that in mind, I'm kind of surprised someone hasn't been able to d o that for the international (8") Tab S & Pro models ... especially this far out into these models life spans. We've had the SM-T325 on T-Mo for over a half year, & so we're no longer hopefull LTE radios will ever find their way onto the international versions. This far out into Tab S & Pro - ATT/T-Mo have STILL shown no interest to release a true phone enabled/LTE model. Samsung really seems to be stepping on their own crank. Between KNOX - no micro SD card slots ... non-removable batteries on their newest products ... who wants these new devices? It's really lame marketing . But I do like their teeny bezel ... so hspa+ Tab pro it is
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For my wife, it it Tab Pro on T-mobile wifi hotspot from her phone. But, only allowed 5 GB/month that way, which is enough for her.
I hope this sparks development and an unlocked bootloader.
http://www.androidpolice.com/2014/11/03/moto-maxx-possibly-a-droid-turbo-variant-for-non-us-markets-spotted-on-google/
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The form factor and all the internals look identical to our variant. This is good news.
its beautiful and in spanish! its coming to me.
man can't wait. I really hope this one will support Tmo band, love the specs and the battery life.
Funny thing is, 3 hour SOT in my nexus 5 considered good battery life, while in this beast 6 hours SOT is some kind of "weak"? Wth? This is QHD. I absolutely love this phone despite a lot of hater out there are screaming everyday
I don't see this released to a few countries alone, I'm thinking more likely it will international with broad release but excluding the US. In other words Clove and the rest are going to have it for sale and getting it will be strictly a matter of dropping the plastic. But then again maybe that's just wishful thinking.
The US Droid Turbo works on International networks via GSM, right? So if this one has identical hardware, less branding, it could potentially work on VZW, right?
fury683 said:
The US Droid Turbo works on International networks via GSM, right? So if this one has identical hardware, less branding, it could potentially work on VZW, right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not exactly. It would need a CDMA radio. Then it would need to support Verizon LTE bands. And then even if they pulled a Nexus 6, because of the CDMA radio, Verizon would have to allow it on the network, which is doubtful because they want to sell you a Droid Turbo.
Character Zero said:
Not exactly. It would need a CDMA radio. Then it would need to support Verizon LTE bands. And then even if they pulled a Nexus 6, because of the CDMA radio, Verizon would have to allow it on the network, which is doubtful because they want to sell you a Droid Turbo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was thinking of how the Nexus 6 worked out of the box, even though it didn't really come from Verizon. Not sure how relevant that is in this case, though. It makes sense, but I don't want it to :/
I think this is great news! Even better that it's still on 4.4.4. Hopefully it gets announced and released ASAP.
fury683 said:
I was thinking of how the Nexus 6 worked out of the box, even though it didn't really come from Verizon. Not sure how relevant that is in this case, though. It makes sense, but I don't want it to :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No one really knows how Verizon is handling the activation of the Nexus 6. Droid-Life was able to pop a Verizon sim in their review unit and it worked. Maybe Google is giving them all the Id numbers and they are just allowing any Nexus 6 to activate in their network? I guess we will see when someone buys one directly from T-Mobile and see if it makes calls.
Character Zero said:
No one really knows how Verizon is handling the activation of the Nexus 6. Droid-Life was able to pop a Verizon sim in their review unit and it worked. Maybe Google is giving them all the Id numbers and they are just allowing any Nexus 6 to activate in their network? I guess we will see when someone buys one directly from T-Mobile and see if it makes calls.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm guessing something similar happened with the Moto X 2013. I bought it from Moto, and it was branded as Verizon. I'd assume Moto told VZW here are all the serials for the VZW XT1060 models. With the Nexus, they may have just given them all of the numbers for all the devices, because I'm guessing you don't specify which carrier you have when you purchase, unless you're doing an upgrade.
Jaocagomez said:
its beautiful and in spanish! its coming to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is portuguese language
Moto Maxx is the global variant of Droid Turbo, if I'm right.
Is it under Lenovo?
Character Zero said:
Not exactly. It would need a CDMA radio. Then it would need to support Verizon LTE bands. And then even if they pulled a Nexus 6, because of the CDMA radio, Verizon would have to allow it on the network, which is doubtful because they want to sell you a Droid Turbo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My guess is they just have the full list of IMEIs.
Something tells me the United States is going to be excluded from this. Im sure it can be imported, but thats just going to jack the price up beyond being worth it.
Am hopeful that we get some positive news for us in the UK tomorrow. What time UK is it, about 2pm?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
qwerty12601 said:
Something tells me the United States is going to be excluded from this. Im sure it can be imported, but thats just going to jack the price up beyond being worth it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since the device HAS passed through FCC as IHDT56PK2 (the droid turbo is IHDT56PK1... the PK2 adds in UMTS/AWS = tmobile 3G), one can assume that they do intend to sell it within the US.
The FCC is a US regulatory body, and is only required for importing into the US.
doitright said:
Since the device HAS passed through FCC as IHDT56PK2 (the droid turbo is IHDT56PK1... the PK2 adds in UMTS/AWS = tmobile 3G), one can assume that they do intend to sell it within the US.
The FCC is a US regulatory body, and is only required for importing into the US.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many devices pass through the FCC and don't ever appear from US consumption. While somewhat promising, its not nearly a sure thing.
Verizon may have an exclusivity right on the model preventing it from being sold on other carriers. At least for the time being. But there's been no press about it being released in the united states, so one can on speculate at this point.
Keep in mind that only means it can be legally imported, it does not show intent to sell. Similar processes are followed throughout much of the world and two variants of a GSM phone can cover most of them. There is little reason not to get FCC certification since it is not an expensive or difficult process within the confines of the larger effort involved in global release and one of the handsets will be suitable for use in the states anyway. I'm not saying its not going to happen, I'm saying the filing does not make it a certainty and more than one phone has seen certification without being sold in the US.
Also to the thread in general the spread of possible IMEIs are public record, Verizon need only block out the range specified for a device in order to block it, they do not need specific numbers off individual devices which are not public record.