windows 8 unable to boot in my additional path assisgned - Windows 8 General

hi
today i downloaded windows 8 x 32 and created a bootable dvd , but the problem i face is that in order to dual boot i create another partition of 20 gb in order to install windows 8.
but when i boot to install windows 8 everything goes fine but it does not allow me to select the partition i created instead it only allows me to install in c drive where my windows 7 is installed.
while my other drive d/e/g- the one i created shrinking my hard disk drive shows that the partition contain one or more dynamic volume that are not supported for install so i can select any of those partition except c.
any assistance appreciated

Why not use some common sense and title your topics correctly?
Titles are suppose to be descriptive not just to say "help", You do that via your topic not make it the title.
Sorry but I personally just find it really annoying when people do this on forums.

I'd agree with you but personally I despise atheists so eh.
Use EasyBCD to create an entry in bootmgr to load Windows 8.

GazaIan said:
I'd agree with you but personally I despise atheists so eh.
Use EasyBCD to create an entry in bootmgr to load Windows 8.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why, because they don't share in your delusion? Or they are not prepared to have a closed mind for the sake of fear of reality?
You are welcome to your weak brains comfort blanket if it makes you feel better, Just don't burn people at the stake because they don't share the same childish belief system as yours.

it seems u guys have all to talk about but dont care to solve issue . rather than pointing out the title i was in hurry so wrote it in short

shhbz said:
hi
today i downloaded windows 8 x 32 and created a bootable dvd , but the problem i face is that in order to dual boot i create another partition of 20 gb in order to install windows 8.
but when i boot to install windows 8 everything goes fine but it does not allow me to select the partition i created instead it only allows me to install in c drive where my windows 7 is installed.
while my other drive d/e/g- the one i created shrinking my hard disk drive shows that the partition contain one or more dynamic volume that are not supported for install so i can select any of those partition except c.
any assistance appreciated
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I faced the same problem when I tried to install. It is because when you created the partition, you converted it from basic to dynamic, and Windows OS cannot be installed on a dynamic volume.
I assume that both the drives are on the same hard disk and hence you might not be able to able to convert one volume into basic using Partition Wizard Home edition that is preinstalled on Windows 7. What you need is either Partition Wizard Professional Edition(which is not free), or the older version of Partition Wizard Free Edition(version 4.2), as the older free version has option to convert volume from dynamic to basic. I would really recommend you to backup your files before doing it. Also remember that you might not be able to reinstall your Windows 7 from recovery drive, if it is a dynamic drive. So better convert it to basic now.
Hope this information helps you.

TheATHEiST said:
Why, because they don't share in your delusion? Or they are not prepared to have a closed mind for the sake of fear of reality?
You are welcome to your weak brains comfort blanket if it makes you feel better, Just don't burn people at the stake because they don't share the same childish belief system as yours.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Funny you don't beleve in relegion but you are under the impression someone made you thread title god..........
Sent from my R800i using Tapatalk

AndroHero said:
Funny you don't beleve in relegion but you are under the impression someone made you thread title god..........
Sent from my R800i using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, believe in religion? Dude I have no problem believing in religion as it exists, Its god I don't believe in.
I in no way inferred that I'm a "title god", Its in the rules to use proper descriptive titles, Plus its just supposed to be common sense. For example, if you was advertising the sale of your car in the paper, You wouldn't put "selling my car" or "car" would you?
Anyway I dont want to get into silly arguments about mythology, Its like arguing about Santa with a child. Move along.

TheATHEiST said:
lol, believe in religion? Dude I have no problem believing in religion as it exists, Its god I don't believe in.
I in no way inferred that I'm a "title god", Its in the rules to use proper descriptive titles, Plus its just supposed to be common sense. For example, if you was advertising the sale of your car in the paper, You wouldn't put "selling my car" or "car" would you?
Anyway I dont want to get into silly arguments about mythology, Its like arguing about Santa with a child. Move along.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow. You really do think your something special. If you bothered to read the rules you would also know that "flaming" people is also contradictory to them. So in future if you have nothing productive to add to the discussion please refrain from running your mouth. Your adolescent attitude is not an asset to the community.

chaitanya91845 said:
I faced the same problem when I tried to install. It is because when you created the partition, you converted it from basic to dynamic, and Windows OS cannot be installed on a dynamic volume.
I assume that both the drives are on the same hard disk and hence you might not be able to able to convert one volume into basic using Partition Wizard Home edition that is preinstalled on Windows 7. What you need is either Partition Wizard Professional Edition(which is not free), or the older version of Partition Wizard Free Edition(version 4.2), as the older free version has option to convert volume from dynamic to basic. I would really recommend you to backup your files before doing it. Also remember that you might not be able to reinstall your Windows 7 from recovery drive, if it is a dynamic drive. So better convert it to basic now.
Hope this information helps you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can really recommend the partitioning software by Easeus.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

MaBlo said:
I can really recommend the partitioning software by Easeus.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, EaseUS is another free popular alternative.

AndroHero said:
Wow. You really do think your something special. If you bothered to read the rules you would also know that "flaming" people is also contradictory to them. So in future if you have nothing productive to add to the discussion please refrain from running your mouth. Your adolescent attitude is not an asset to the community.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, so when did I "flame" somebody?
My post WAS productive. I pointed out to the user how to make topics correctly, ie to title them correctly instead of just putting "Hellllppp" as a title.
My other posts was in reply to somebody else brining up religion into the topic. Also how can you call my replies "adolescent", I was defending myself.
Its you who needs to go away and grow up, accusing people of "flaming" and "adolescent attitude" just because they was defending them selves and talking sense rather then arse vomit like you are.
I'm done!

Related

Microsoft is obviously paying for this forum. This is not an XDA OS

Ok, really, did Microsoft pay to have this forum created?
This is a desktop oriented OS... Sure, it WORKS on some Tablet PCs.. Not many and really, who has them?
This is a hacking/developing/home-brew community. Microsoft runs services for consumers, not developers. Android is the most used OS on the forums and I consider it crap that XDA has placed Windows in the position of honor.
XDA (Cross-Digital Assistant) is for Cellular Digital Assistants and and Personal Digital Assistants. Windows 8 is neither. It supports concepts from Windows Phone 7, but we would not have a iOS forum and we would not have a Kubuntu forum.
I vote the forum be removed. I also vote that XDA stop selling out.
Reserved so the first post won't be a microsoft consumer representative posing as a user.
AdamOutler said:
Android is the most used OS on the forums and I consider it crap that XDA has placed Windows in the position of honor
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting idea. Let me inform you sir, that this forum has always been Windows Mobile centric since and/or from it's foundation (Hopefully I'm not mistaken). Then along came Android and things got.. Well let's say complicated.
The "free" approach that Google has installed in all of you, has created a whole bunch whiners and trolls who feel entitled that everything should be given to them without any sacrifice from the user. Not like this was any different when it was Windows Mobile only, but we had our secluded spot.
I do not care for Android but everyone should have their own space, understood?
OR
Technology changes faster than the blink of an eye, and if you are reluctant to change, you are in the wrong forum.
Believe me, XDA for me used to be one of those "secret-spots" I'd come to have a nice read and communicate with new and old members alike.
Ever since Android has been introduced to XDA, things have gotten more intense, like debates among who's OS is better or not (Even in Non-Android forums)... something that I may not care but YET I respect others wishes.
Needless to say, I hope you revise your post and be MINDFUL OF OTHERS who will have a need for this forum.
If you do not wish to remain here for a meaningful discussion "On-Topic" mind you, then go back to your Android thread where you belong then.
Thank you and have a nice day. Sometimes it's nice to see things from another perspective, try it once in a while.
I don't get how it can annoy you in any way possible? Just ignore it and you'll be fine. And who knows we could use this to find stuff about which tablets it ports to etc. So IMO it's kinda needed.
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA App
Do you see a Donut, Froyo, Gingerbread or IceCream Sandwich forums here?
Windows has been fundamentally the same since NT. They've partially implemented security permissions and have yet to keep up with the level of Linux in that department. Because of additional convolution, they could have a Windows7/8 forum in addition to the Windows CE forum (which mobile fits into).
There's no call to have a windows 7 and 8 forum at all. Having a new forum for that is like having a new forum for each manufacturer's UI implementation. There's nothing revolutionary about the 8 interface. It's simply hiding the default Windows interface and it's a merge of the Windows7 phone interface into the desktop.
Windows needs to do a total revamp, starting with NTFS. The Filesystem is garbage. It hinders use and development. I know because I have developed Windows applications. Modularisation is the key to a good operating system. Never in my life have I considered a partial implementation of permissions (Windows 7 and vista), nor a Skinned UI(Windows 8), nor merging of a mobile and a desktop platform into a single interface (Windows 8), worthy of an entire forum.
Windows CE variants, and Windows Vista variants... Sure. Windows 8 is not XDA material. It's not a digital assitant like WP7, and it's not a phone. Howabout a Windows forum with Arm and x86 categories?
AdamOutler said:
"Do you see a Donut, Froyo, Gingerbread or IceCream Sandwich forums here?"
"Windows has been fundamentally the same since NT. They've partially implemented security permissions and have yet to keep up with the level of Linux in that department"
"Windows needs to do a total revamp, starting with NTFS. The Filesystem is garbage. It hinders use and development. I know because I have developed Windows applications"
"Modularisation is the key to a good operating system. Never in my life have I considered a partial implementation of permissions (Windows 7 and vista), nor a Skinned UI(Windows 8), nor merging of a mobile and a desktop platform into a single interface (Windows 8), worthy of an entire forum"
"Windows CE variants, and Windows Vista variants... Sure. Windows 8 is not XDA material. It's not a digital assitant like WP7, and it's not a phone"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude, leave the fanboyism aside. All the above are not facts, but YOUR opinion and YOUR opinion ALONE.
This is exactly the same thing I was talking about. You obviously have no interest on a Windows forum.
YET you are here trolling because YOU do not agree with it, so therefore NO ONE ELSE can have it??
Should I complain to XDA (i.e) Because Google has privacy issues AND violates them on a constant basis, so therefore we shouldn't have Android? NO, simply NO.
These are opinions and not facts.
XDA is set up in this place to CONTRIBUTE and DISCUSS material ON TOPIC of the above mentioned forum, not to spew hatred because you simply do not agree with.
NFRCER said:
Dude, leave the fanboyism aside. All the above are not facts, but YOUR opinion and YOUR opinion ALONE.
This is exactly the same thing I was talking about. You obviously have no interest on a Windows forum.
YET you are here trolling because YOU do not agree with it, so therefore NO ONE ELSE can have it??
Should I complain to XDA (i.e) Because Google has privacy issues AND violates them on a constant basis, so therefore we shouldn't have Android? NO, simply NO.
These are opinions and not facts.
XDA is set up in this place to CONTRIBUTE and DISCUSS material ON TOPIC of the above mentioned forum, not to spew hatred because you simply do not agree with.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No sir, you are exhibiting fanboyism. If you've ever tried to program cross-platform then you will realize how convoluted and screwed up Windows methods are.
Hardware abstractions requiring proprietary drivers hinder development
Interfacing devices requires implementations of $10,000 signatures from Microsoft
Utilizing user granted elevated permissions requires 30 additional steps to a program
Tools which assist with elevation of permissions are considered "Malware"
Installation of applications requires access to a unorganized "database" called the registry
Utilizing pieces of equipment which you have purchased in a different way is entirely too convoluted to even consider for any sort of software distribution.
Microsoft's provided generic drivers are buggy, so you can test and pay to sign if you're serious.
If you'd like links to any of the above, I'll show you in code, or examples I've dealt with in the last few months. Why do you deal with them? Because you're told by the mass market that it's what you want. It came on your computer. You learned it.
These are normal every-day life for you when you run Windows. Learn Linux and you will not have these problems. You will soon learn that they are *IN FACT* problems. They require several work-arounds and cash in order to utilize your creative freedoms as a developer.
You say opinion, I throw the gauntlet sir.
Well, I'm not bigger Linux fan than Windows, I use Windows for everyday. But really, Windows 8 is not available for ARM, and we don't know for sure if it will ever be, and when. So I see no point on making 2 boards for Beta release of some system.
I don't see boards for Fedora, Ubuntu, RedHat, Knoppix. Most of them are more available for XDA devices than Win8 (more is not appropriate word here, as its like dividing 1 by 0 for now)
I see no place for Win8 boards on XDA Developers for now, while it has got nothing to do with portable devices but some press notes.
AdamOutler said:
No sir, you are exhibiting fanboyism. If you've ever tried to program cross-platform then you will realize how convoluted and screwed up Windows methods are.
Hardware abstractions requiring proprietary drivers hinder development
Interfacing devices requires implementations of $10,000 signatures from Microsoft
Utilizing user granted elevated permissions requires 30 additional steps to a program
Tools which assist with elevation of permissions are considered "Malware"
Installation of applications requires access to a unorganized "database" called the registry
Utilizing pieces of equipment which you have purchased in a different way is entirely too convoluted to even consider for any sort of software distribution.
Microsoft's provided generic drivers are buggy, so you can test and pay to sign if you're serious.
If you'd like links to any of the above, I'll show you in code, or examples I've dealt with in the last few months. Why do you deal with them? Because you're told by the mass market that it's what you want. It came on your computer. You learned it.
These are normal every-day life for you when you run Windows. Learn Linux and you will not have these problems. You will soon learn that they are *IN FACT* problems. They require several work-arounds and cash in order to utilize your creative freedoms as a developer.
You say opinion, I throw the gauntlet sir.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Adam, I have read your post in it's entirety and I have to say that even if these issues are preventing development, you came into this forum and I quote: ("Android is the most used OS on the forums and I consider it crap that XDA has placed Windows in the position of honor" "Ok, really, did Microsoft pay to have this forum created?").
Do you really think that this is are reasons enough to have it your way? Would you be happy if I went and trashed the Android forums just for the fun of it? If you would have posted this in the Android forums, you would have not heard from me at all. The issue at hand, that I see.. Os that you come into this forum insulting XDA and the future users of this forum and then say, this shouldn't be here at all.
Your complaints cannot be fixed in this forum at all, because XDA was designed to find tweaks and even hacks etc to make our OS better and responsive. Are you so mad that you are willing to deny the chance to other users because of your own jealousy and hatred for such a corporation?
Learn to share and let others live as they see fit. If Windows works for them, then it does, period. Or would you rather have them all move to chromium and/or Google products? That's very kind of you but users do not need to be berated for choosing as such. This is more on the lines of fanboyism. I said it before.
Would you be okay if I do the same on the Android forums?
NFRCER said:
Adam, I have read your post in it's entirety and I have to say that even if these issues are preventing development, you came into this forum and I quote: ("Android is the most used OS on the forums and I consider it crap that XDA has placed Windows in the position of honor" "Ok, really, did Microsoft pay to have this forum created?").
Do you really think that this is are reasons enough to have it your way? Would you be happy if I went and trashed the Android forums just for the fun of it? If you would have posted this in the Android forums, you would have not heard from me at all. The issue at hand, that I see.. Os that you come into this forum insulting XDA and the future users of this forum and then say, this shouldn't be here at all.
Your complaints cannot be fixed in this forum at all, because XDA was designed to find tweaks and even hacks etc to make our OS better and responsive. Are you so mad that you are willing to deny the chance to other users because of your own jealousy and hatred for such a corporation?
Learn to share and let others live as they see fit. If Windows works for them, then it does, period. Or would you rather have them all move to chromium and/or Google products? That's very kind of you but users do not need to be berated for choosing as such. This is more on the lines of fanboyism. I said it before.
Would you be okay if I do the same on the Android forums?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
XDA was designed for PDA and CDA devices.. Not desktop operating systems. Anything designed in Windows 8 will have to be redesigned for any sort of XDA device. It's a desktop operating system, not a XDA operating system. This was stated upon release of Windows 8 developer preview.
http://i55.tinypic.com/ngulw1.png
AdamOutler said:
XDA was designed for PDA and CDA devices.. Not desktop operating systems. Anything designed in Windows 8 will have to be redesigned for any sort of XDA device. It's a desktop operating system, not a XDA operating system. This was stated upon release of Windows 8 developer preview.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This should have been your first post instead. I do not disagree whether the forum should exist here or not, but rather the manner you come in busting doors left and right only to proclaim Android as king of these forums and who knows what.
I understand your motives and why you feel as you do. I do not take that away from you, neither it's my intention. Its just that everyone has the right to have something, and if Linux was to be added tomorrow, I'd be happier for those who will make the most of it. Even if unrelated as it may be.
I only want to convey the message that one-sided approaches will get alot of people offended. That is all I want you to see.
I respect your opinion, and I feel you bring up a good point. I wish I could help to make that situation better but unfortunately I do not have such knowledge.
But this forum is my home now, as new as it may be it will be of the utmost help to me and perhaps other users.
And I had felt insulted that you accused XDA of selling out (Your home) and that you are trying to take my home away.
I only hope you can be comprehensive of my side as well and that we can both stand in the common ground.
I understand. We don't need a new forum for every version of Windows.. We don't have a forum for every version of Chrome. We don't have a forum for every version of Android. We don't have a forum for every version of OS-X. This is not a XDA OS. It's a Desktop OS. You will not be developing for this platform as an XDA. Obviously paid advertisement
If they have a Windows 8 forum, they need a Ubuntu forum and a OS-X forum. It makes no damn sense except that Microsoft has paid off XDA to promote their operating system. I read a statistic last month that the vast majority of people on this forum were on Android. Yet, somehow Microsoft's OSs are all listed at the top. It's not even alphabetical or in any order. Obviously paid advertisement.
Then stack the fact that the Windows 8 is not even a mobile OS. Microsoft has officially released that mobile and desktop apps will be mutually exclusive because of architecture and battery life. This is not a mobile development platform. Obviously paid advertisement
Microsoft is ****ting on my home. Might as well call it Computer-Developers.com
I mean seriously Microsoft.... How the **** can you make a developer release when the developer tools dont work?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
And somehow get sponsored on a mobile device forum with a Desktop OS..
This is absolute bull****.
Well that's Microsoft. For ya.
Please pardon me as I have been drinking and tend to say thing from the heart.
AdamOutler said:
I mean seriously Microsoft.... How the **** can you make a developer release when the developer tools dont work?
And somehow get sponsored on a mobile device forum with a Desktop OS..
This is absolute bull****.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my unbrickable cappy *bam*
Hey Adam you might wanna calm down. Your childish side is showing
If you can't make a coherent discussion then you do not deserve to even be here at all. I tried to do it differently and you can't even properly answer back.
This discussion is over and I hope that if a mod sees this, just close it or lock it. Anyways, thanks for trying at least, it was entertaining and I hope we meet again.
Take care and have a nice day.
Just the name of the thread had my trollsenses tingling. Great stuff Adam.
FlawlesStyle said:
Just the name of the thread had my trollsenses tingling. Great stuff Adam.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is not a troll thread. Its blatently obvious why a desktop OS has no place on XDA developers. They have no plan for a mobile version yet.
Dude. Get over it. If you don't like it then don't read the forum. Pretty damn simple.
Really, I'm not joking here.. I've seen this before. Lockergnome used to be reserved for the technically savy until they started the forums and everyone signed up to ask questions. It used to be a series of blogs and a newsletter with quality control. That control is now gone and the articles are just about "cool stuff" that people think is smart. At one point it was technical, now it's artsy.
The thing that keeps this forum prestigious is that it is limited to a certain kind of device. This will open the flood gates for noobs to ask questions about EVERYTHING computer related. Once that starts, we will be tailoring to the masses. The noobs will take over and basically turn the place into another garbage forum like http://www.lockergnome.com/ . It will take 2 years. Mark.
Please, XDA, I urge you.. Contact User Experience Admin Svetius Windows 8 is a desktop OS, not a mobile OS. It is not designed for any mobile device. If you care about the forums, lets try to keep the desktop and laptop stuff out.
AdamOutler said:
Really, I'm not joking here.. I've seen this before. Lockergnome used to be reserved for the technically savy until they started the forums and everyone signed up to ask questions. It used to be a series of blogs and a newsletter with quality control. That control is now gone and the articles are just about "cool stuff" that people think is smart. At one point it was technical, now it's artsy.
The thing that keeps this forum prestigious is that it is limited to a certain kind of device. This will open the flood gates for noobs to ask questions about EVERYTHING computer related. Once that starts, we will be tailoring to the masses. The noobs will take over and basically turn the place into another garbage forum like http://www.lockergnome.com/ . It will take 2 years. Mark.
Please, XDA, I urge you.. Contact User Experience Admin Svetius Windows 8 is a desktop OS, not a mobile OS. It is not designed for any mobile device. If you care about the forums, lets try to keep the desktop and laptop stuff out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll kill this argument
Windows 8 is a desktop OS, yep surely is. But it also has ARM support and has ARM support for a pretty long time (since about 7850, which was the January build).
Now what do the majority of phones run? ARM. Windows 8 is on a forum where phones run ARM processors...It's pretty simple the reason
Same reason why the htc tablet (running vista and windows mobile) had its own forum. It's not as if this hasn't occurred before...
Just let it go

Need of an Antivirus in ANDROID

So, guys..
I was going through some blogs, which stated that there are so many malicious apps in android market. Recently, Avast, which has launched an app in market, reported to google about some malicious apps.
Here is the article:-
https://blog.avast.com/2011/12/13/android-malware-in-the-open-marketplace/
So, what i was thinking is that do we really need an Antivirus app, to protect our android phone??
Using an antivirus app will mean that, it will consume RAM continuously, and so will consume battery too.
I am starting this thread, so that we can discuss, here ,if we really need it.
So, share your views, experiences with any malicious app in the market place, and also suggestions about which antivirus app should we use, if this kind of thing exists in android.
Of course you do, i use Lookout Mobile Security and it has caught a few trojans which were potenially harmful to my phone, not too many but it did quarantine a few since ive had it.
Basically anyone who doesn't have any type of protection on their dog and bone is taking a big chance.
The answer is NO.
I've posted an article from tech2.com in Indian thread where someone from Google said it while talking about Trozan AV apps.
ithehappy said:
The answer is NO.
I've posted an article from tech2.com in Indian thread where someone from Google said it while talking about Trozan AV apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did u read the link i posted?
It really shows the possibility of some malicious apps, co-existing in Android Market. Don't we need to be protected?
ithehappy said:
The answer is NO.
I've posted an article from tech2.com in Indian thread where someone from Google said it while talking about Trozan AV apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well if you ever get a trojan on your SGSII don't come crying on here, ever heard of better be safe than sorry!!
jonny68 said:
Well if you ever get a trojan on your SGSII don't come crying on here, ever heard of better be safe than sorry!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats what i am trying here "Better be safe than sorry"
Well you should've created this thread without the 'Do' and '?'. Everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion. You didn't like my post IGNORE it, don't quote me and advice me what I need to do. A '?' thread should only be created where everyone can share his/her opinion and then it's up to the Thread starter what he/she will take from all the answers.
Anyway, keep using what you are using.
@jonny68- Have you seen such a thread like that in this 8 + months?
This is what Chris Dibona, Google's Open Source Program Manager said,
Chris DiBona, Google's open-source programs manager stated in a blog post, “No major cell phone has a 'virus' problem in the traditional sense that Windows and some Mac machines have seen. Virus companies are playing on your fears to try to sell you bulls***protection software for Android.”
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source:
http://tech2.in.com/news/android/go...-antivirus-apps-in-android-marketplace/260952
Sorry I had to BOLD the line for you guys, it's a shame to modify some other comments.
Another thing, if someone even said that Antiviruses are needed for Android I would never use it.
The story is exactly the opposite when I use my Desktop PC fyi.
Regards.
ithehappy said:
Well you should've created this thread without the 'Do' and '?'. Everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion. You didn't like my post IGNORE it, don't quote me and advice me what I need to do. A '?' thread should only be created where everyone can share his/her opinion and then it's up to the Thread starter what he/she will take from all the answers.
Anyway, keep using what you are using.
@jonny68- Have you seen such a thread like that in this 8 + months?
This is what Chris Dibona, Google's Open Source Program Manager said,
Source:
http://tech2.in.com/news/android/go...-antivirus-apps-in-android-marketplace/260952
Sorry I had to BOLD the line for you guys, it's a shame to modify some other comments.
Another thing, if someone even said that Antiviruses are needed for Android I would never use it.
The story is exactly the opposite when I use my Desktop PC fyi.
Regards.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You forgot the rest of this story:
"Honestly, anti-virus software are not needed on mobiles, just as long as you don’t download random apps you should be just fine" ...
Most people in here download and install tons of apps, modifications and tweeaks on rooted phones ... LOL
Why not just instal a free one?
Better safe than sorry...
Send from my GT-I(OVER-9000) using XDA App.
ithehappy said:
Well you should've created this thread without the 'Do' and '?'. Everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion. You didn't like my post IGNORE it, don't quote me and advice me what I need to do. A '?' thread should only be created where everyone can share his/her opinion and then it's up to the Thread starter what he/she will take from all the answers.
Anyway, keep using what you are using.
@jonny68- Have you seen such a thread like that in this 8 + months?
This is what Chris Dibona, Google's Open Source Program Manager said,
Source:
http://tech2.in.com/news/android/go...-antivirus-apps-in-android-marketplace/260952
Sorry I had to BOLD the line for you guys, it's a shame to modify some other comments.
Another thing, if someone even said that Antiviruses are needed for Android I would never use it.
The story is exactly the opposite when I use my Desktop PC fyi.
Regards.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
M sorry, if it hurted u.
Everyone has absolute right to express their views.Be it wrong or right.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Well Google are hardly gonna freely admit the fact that there are some rogue apps in the Android Market which contain trojans as this will put off many people (not just talking anti-virus here), the simple facts are despite the nonsense by Chris DeBona or whoever is the fact that you are taking a calculated rick by not having some type of protection on your phone, this is even more so if you do happen to download apps from other sources but even in the Android Market you can never be totally sure, Lookout Mobile Security is totally and utterly 100% legit and used by many thousands of people and business' alike,clearly there are some rogue apps masquerading as anti-virus apps but also others too.
Smartphones are like pc's now. What you can do with your computer your smartphone does it for you on the go. You have so many apps you browse over the net even if you are using the wireless one from home say for example anything can come through..Say if you are downloading a rom or a leak you never know what might be in them...As the OP and Jonny said above.."always be safe than sorry" that is how i see things
http://androidship.com/2011/05/29/the-android-anti-virus-epidemic/
Read that.
If you plan on downloading apps without looking at who makes them or looking at any reviews, then yes, there's a chance you can get an app that causes issues.
And that applies for ALL os's. How many apple laptop/desktop users run an antivirus? Android is built on the same type of platform, unix.
That doesn't mean an 'antivirus' app will do anything special. It uninstalls apps the same way you do under manage applications.
Sent from my páhhōniē
I all true sense you need to have read the permission that the applications needs when you install a app. If your are lazy enough to not do that have application like LBE security installed to monitor what each applications is up to ... i believe rather then a antivirus a good app fire wall is needed.
You probably don't need one, just as any power Windows user doesn't. That said you'd be crazy to not have one in Windows. Difference being a desktop has a tremendous amount of resources and allocating some to an antivirus program is no big deal. Not so on a phone. Plus there's the consideration of battery impact.
In a nutshell I'd say you'd be just fine without one.
I feel much the same way about antiviruses on Android as I do about hand-holding paid antivirus programs on Windows. If you know what you're doing, you don't need them at all. On the other hand, if you're going to download hundreds of dodgy applications at random and pay no attention to reviews/permissions/odd behaviour, then more fool you, get an antivirus app.
LBE privacy guard is a different story, since it performs a rather different function, and allows you to enjoy apps like Facebook without giving them access to the likes of text messages and phone ID.
You guys know Samsung have their own lightweight security suite in Samsung apps, yeah?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
ithehappy said:
Well you should've created this thread without the 'Do' and '?'. Everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion. You didn't like my post IGNORE it, don't quote me and advice me what I need to do. A '?' thread should only be created where everyone can share his/her opinion and then it's up to the Thread starter what he/she will take from all the answers.
Anyway, keep using what you are using.
@jonny68- Have you seen such a thread like that in this 8 + months?
This is what Chris Dibona, Google's Open Source Program Manager said,
Source:
http://tech2.in.com/news/android/go...-antivirus-apps-in-android-marketplace/260952
Sorry I had to BOLD the line for you guys, it's a shame to modify some other comments.
Another thing, if someone even said that Antiviruses are needed for Android I would never use it.
The story is exactly the opposite when I use my Desktop PC fyi.
Regards.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I totally agree, like task killers and power managers, useless...
I hate the kind of pseudo-logic that is thrown around in these discussions, which paraphrase to look something like this...
LogicLord221 said:
<insert random bull**** about why their point is valid> there's a million million trojans out there and platform x is so insecure, I read this and this which says we're all in danger!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Basically, the point people are trying to make is that danger lurks everywhere, and you need to protect yourself, or you'll be sorry later. Scare tactics at best.
While I am an advocate for protection by prevention, that doesn't automatically lead to the conclusion that you need antivirus software for your device! It's that kind of bull**** logic that annoys the **** out of me. To quote the Oxford English Dictionary:
"Prevention"
Pronunciation: /prɪˈvɛnʃn/
noun
[mass noun]
The action of stopping something from happening or arising.
Phrases:
Prevention is better than cure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you see the problem here? It doesn't say "The action of installing an antivirus", it says to stop something from happening. There are many ways to go about preventing infection of your device:
1) Check what you're downloading comes from either a) a reputable source, b) is backed by a reputable source, or c) is backed by numerous (>50-100) positive comments, reviews, etc. This means, don't download that app that has a bunch of one-star reviews, and has people screaming "TROJAN!" in the comments field.
2) Stick to the Market. While it's true that a lot of the infected content will indeed come from the Market itself, Google do a good job of removing offending apps, so compared to other sources of content (e.g. just downloading the APK from a server), it's a lot safer.
3) Don't pirate ****. This is probably the number-one source of malware on Android. Don't be a cheap dumbass.
4) Stay away from 'questionable' material. This includes, but isn't limited to:
- porn
- pirated content
- file sharing sites
5) Have some common sense! I can't stress this one enough, you can have the most advanced piece of software in the world, but if you're acting like a reckless child, you don't deserve to use the device, and you're bound to find yourself neck-deep in malware. Apart from the above, take some active steps to secure yourself. Change your browser settings to run Flash content on-demand instead of automatically, (if possible) set it to have you manually accept cookies, etc. Perhaps the best use of common sense would be in checking the permissions you allow an app access to when it's installed. Look, if an app that is designed to parse a line of text is requesting full internet access, access to SMS capabilities, etc., it'd be best to leave it alone, don't you think? Moreover, if something's requesting superuser permissions, it'd better have a damn good reason why. Read the permissions, and understand what you're allowing.
...because in the end, that's the hard truth -you're the one allowing access.
If you follow these simple steps, you'll protect yourself from 99% of malware. If you're worried about that 1%, don't be. Android malware hasn't progressed to the point where it's a major threat yet, so even if something does get through, it'll more than likely be nothing too major, and you'll figure out something's up pretty quick anyway. This may not be the case in say 12 months, but for now, it's fine.
If you're really paranoid, keep an app on standby, and run a scan every week or two, but disable any background process it has, it's more of a waste of time anyway. On a final note, keep in mind that it's been shown multiple times that Android antivirus software is, to be blunt, rubbish at detecting even the most common pieces of malware.
Remember, prevention is better than a cure
Im using kasperky mobile security cause i got a 1 year licence from a magazine.. But i never got an alarm until now (1,5 months), so i think atm its not necessary to use it .. Perhaps in some months when there are more viruses out in the web^^
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
screamworks said:
3) Don't pirate ****. This is probably the number-one source of malware on Android. Don't be a cheap dumbass.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most Android apps are of such low quality they don't deserve to be purchased.
Sent from my SGH-I897

Make Windows 8 x64 RTM Enterprise N Edition Bootable ISO at DVD or USB

It's a Windows 8 Enterprise RTM x64 N English Version.
N Version is with out Media Player.
I attach the torrent of Win8 at the end of this post
Here you have a tutorial to make ISO bootable:
If you can´t to see here you have youtube link
WBI Creator Download
Bootable USB utillity Download
To make bootable USB only you have after download it, make bootble ISO like you see at video and then select a bootable ISO and push "Start ISO" be careful the USB it will format. Or you can toast in a DVD with your favourite burner...
Source: ClubSO.com.ar
Reported
Isn't this the leaked versions?....
Donny1987 said:
Reported
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why did you report me?
PoisonWolf said:
Isn't this the leaked versions?....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I supose, It can be...
Pnx said:
Why did you report me?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because posting links to an official unreleased OS like this is akin to piracy perhaps, you can debate the ethics side of this all you like and the fact that without CD keys and working cracks its not technically illegal but I think the spirit of the forums suggests that it should not be on here.
RTM released is interesting news, we don't need dodgy links to it however and it just opens the doors for other material that may be considered even less ethical but along similar lines.
dazza9075 said:
Because posting links to an official unreleased OS like this is akin to piracy perhaps, you can debate the ethics side of this all you like and the fact that without CD keys and working cracks its not technically illegal but I think the spirit of the forums suggests that it should not be on here.
RTM released is interesting news, we don't need dodgy links to it however and it just opens the doors for other material that may be considered even less ethical but along similar lines.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, then I will take off all the win8 links. But I think technically it isn't a finally product... But I don't want any problem... I will leave only a video and Apps to make bootable the ISO and to make bootable USB with an ISO.
Pnx said:
Ok, then I will take off all the win8 links. But I think technically it isn't a finally product... But I don't want any problem... I will leave only a video and Apps to make bootable the ISO and to make bootable USB with an ISO.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
RTM is about as final as it gets given that this is what OEMs receive to start pumping out computers left right and centre
Unless MS make this publically available then it is there property to do as they will, which means its not ours an we cant go posting it around
but hey, strike one Win for self moderation on a forum without starting a flame fest!
We all should pat ourselves on the back
First, this is a very gray area. The leaked version of win8 could be viewed as no different to a phone os such as win phone 7. Its the life blood of xda.
On the flip side, as a licenced product its warez, and is against xda rules..
I'll allow this thread to continue subject to certain rules as discussion only.
1/ no links to the leaked version.
2/ discussion is fine but no links to any cracks or cracked versions of the os.
I'll keep an eye on this and will close this if any breaches occur
Regards
Chris
chrisd1a1 said:
First, this is a very gray area. The leaked version of win8 could be viewed as no different to a phone os such as win phone 7. Its the life blood of xda.
On the flip side, as a licenced product its warez, and is against xda rules..
I'll allow this thread to continue subject to certain rules as discussion only.
1/ no links to the leaked version.
2/ discussion is fine but no links to any cracks or cracked versions of the os.
I'll keep an eye on this and will close this if any breaches occur
Regards
Chris
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, thanks
windows 7 usb tool is good enough to create a bootable usb
dazza9075 said:
Because posting links to an official unreleased OS like this is akin to piracy perhaps, you can debate the ethics side of this all you like and the fact that without CD keys and working cracks its not technically illegal but I think the spirit of the forums suggests that it should not be on here.
RTM released is interesting news, we don't need dodgy links to it however and it just opens the doors for other material that may be considered even less ethical but along similar lines.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even though Microsoft probably isn't happy that these leaked before their official release... They're not illegal. Hacking the activation or using a key that's been obtained through illicit means however would make it illegal. Otherwise it's pretty much a 30 day trial OS.
don't be so sure, the content of the ISOs is their IP, unless its officially distributed its not technically legal as it wasn't given permission to be distributed oh and its completely un trustworthy from MS point of view too. That's why I said grey, because you are right as well, nothing has been stolen unless you crack it... But is that really stealing... Software laws don't easily fit in to todays world
Sent from my HD2 using XDA Windows Phone 7 App
Donny1987 said:
Reported
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, what a douche bag. Hey ranger rick, thanks for looking out... /s
dpdoughty said:
Wow, what a douche bag. Hey ranger rick, thanks for looking out... /s
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Troll
Sent from my HTC Sensation XL with Beats Audio X315e using Tapatalk 2
Suuuuure. Go read the definition.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
dpdoughty said:
Suuuuure. Go read the definition.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
go read the forum rules
Its not pirated warez. Actually that OS is readily available to download on Microsoft's internal servers. Anyone can download it if they work there.
What's next, links to office 2013 preview are gonna be pulled because its not official and you have to have an account with ms to download it.
Next time don't be such a ****
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
dpdoughty said:
Its not pirated warez. Actually that OS is readily available to download on Microsoft's internal servers. Anyone can download it if they work there.
What's next, links to office 2013 preview are gonna be pulled because its not official and you have to have an account with ms to download it.
Next time don't be such a ****
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Software piracy is the mislicensing, unauthorized reproduction and illegal distribution of software,
That paragraph was taken from microsofts own site. Clearly the OP does not have microsoft permission to distribute there software. Thus that makes it piracy and against forum rules.
Sent from my HTC Sensation XL with Beats Audio X315e using Tapatalk 2
dpdoughty said:
Wow, what a douche bag. Hey ranger rick, thanks for looking out... /s
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Zeh rulez are zeh rulez!!!
Sent from my HTC Sensation using xda premium
AndroHero said:
Software piracy is the mislicensing, unauthorized reproduction and illegal distribution of software,
That paragraph was taken from microsofts own site. Clearly the OP does not have microsoft permission to distribute there software. Thus that makes it piracy and against forum rules.
Sent from my HTC Sensation XL with Beats Audio X315e using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not seeing where it says distribution of RTM software sans crack or key is considered piracy. RTM doesnt even allow you to boot without a valid key at this point. No trial periods here. Perhaps you should see if the RIAA or the MPAA are hiring, you might find yourself more at home.

I need a new idea?!

Hi to all, please i need an idea for an app to develop? i don't need a brilliant or complicated idea! just a simple one to be achieved by us (me and my friend), our goal is to bring a working android app to life.
I have an idea:
Make a app which has more demand but less competition in Google Play
Like Education base or Virtual Reality app
Devesh25 said:
I have an idea:
Make a app which has more demand but less competition in Google Play
Like Education base or Virtual Reality app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, but i really didn't understand what do you mean by Education base or Virtual Reality app? Please can you give me an explanation?
hypered said:
Thanks, but i really didn't understand what do you mean by Education base or Virtual Reality app? Please can you give me an explanation?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Examples of an Education base app:
app which has collection of maths & physics formula so that students:fingers-crossed: don't need textbook to Remind/view formlua....etc
Example of Virtual Reality app:
awesome 3D HD Role playing game where user can feel himself in game world like GTA, may payne game.
TIP: Game must be made for Tablets/Phablet with OpenGL3.0 to get most awesome graphics
Thanks for your help. I like the first idea, it's very interesting but the second is far beyond my capability (to buitd an entirely 3D engine!! it's scary.)
Like i said i'm a just helpless newbie. Any other ideas? i appreciate your help.
hypered said:
Thanks for your help. I like the first idea, it's very interesting but the second is far beyond my capability (to buitd an entirely 3D engine!! it's scary.)
Like i said i'm a just helpless newbie. Any other ideas? i appreciate your help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would recommend that you first start off with some really simple programs like a Calculator etc.
Once an app gets developed and works properly; your confidence is bound to increase; helping you make better programs!
You could create a vault for the android phone. The vault can then store all types of files like images,text documents,videos and its back end as the sd card. The data in the sd card should be encrypted.
To open the vault you could put up 3 levels of security, like first a 4 digit code,then a pattern,then a question. So that the vault remains safe
SufiyanSadiq said:
You could create a vault for the android phone. The vault can then store all types of files like images,text documents,videos and its back end as the sd card. The data in the sd card should be encrypted.
To open the vault you could put up 3 levels of security, like first a 4 digit code,then a pattern,then a question. So that the vault remains safe
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks you, but my english level is not that high! so please can you re explain what did you say please? especially: a vault for the android phone?
hypered said:
Thanks you, but my english level is not that high! so please can you re explain what did you say please? especially: a vault for the android phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A vault is like a safe, or a locker, where you store your things safely.
Create a safe, locker or a vault for your data. To keep your data safe in a lock
Devesh25 said:
Examples of an Education base app:
app which has collection of maths & physics formula so that students:fingers-crossed: don't need textbook to Remind/view formlua....etc
Example of Virtual Reality app:
awesome 3D HD Role playing game where user can feel himself in game world like GTA, may payne game.
TIP: Game must be made for Tablets/Phablet with OpenGL3.0 to get most awesome graphics
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think then you gotta check : http://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.droidacid.apticalc
Any suggestions or feedback would be appreciated.
coolbud012 said:
I think then you gotta check : http://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.droidacid.apticalc
Any suggestions or feedback would be appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good: you made this app
its cool :laugh: & i guess every college must ask student to take aptitude test to select perfect stream in future
Agree
Devesh25 said:
:good: you made this app
its cool :laugh: & i guess every college must ask student to take aptitude test to select perfect stream in future
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree with you as aptitude matter a lot at placement time.
Rest any suggestions on same would be appreciated. A lot of updates are pending on the same as I have having some signing key issues and I'm not sure if its still resolved.
Thanks
coolbud012 said:
Agree with you as aptitude matter a lot at placement time.
Rest any suggestions on same would be appreciated. A lot of updates are pending on the same as I have having some signing key issues and I'm not sure if its still resolved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A little suggestion:angel:
make this app compatible with budget Tablets
because in india, i dont think college/parents are so rich to give hi-end tablets to their kids:laugh:
& also create separate version for tablets/phablets as screen size is large so UI must be eye catchy
at the end of aptitude add "share" icon/button so that result can be shared on fb or something else(optional)
& try to Save result in PDF file or HTML file so that user can see result on any device any time
:good: Hit thanks if i help you:angel:
Devesh25 said:
A little suggestion:angel:
make this app compatible with budget Tablets
because in india, i dont think college/parents are so rich to give hi-end tablets to their kids:laugh:
& also create separate version for tablets/phablets as screen size is large so UI must be eye catchy
at the end of aptitude add "share" icon/button so that result can be shared on fb or something else(optional)
& try to Save result in PDF file or HTML file so that user can see result on any device any time
:good: Hit thanks if i help you:angel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice suggestions, I had made the layout catchy but sync with git ruined everything...Also I was not able to set it up for every device size...
Rest for tablets I have to use Fragments...Lets see whenever I would get time,
Sharing on fb seems to be good suggestion would try to include that in future updates.
Creating a pdf, html , dont think its a constructive one as no one would be interested to check his/her score out of the app.
New Idea
Build an app that can send text to pc over wifi or any wireless medium & also vice versa...

Move along, derailed thread.

--
Not really, at least, not very practically. You *might* be able to set the flag that the RT jailbreak un-sets (assuming it isn't "protected" by PatchGuard the way it is in RT 8.1) but that could break a lot more things than you'd realize; desktop Windows isn't intended to be locked down that way. The best bet that I'm aware of is AppLocker (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd723678(v=WS.10).aspx). That link is for Win7 but I'm sure you can find resources for Win8 as well.
Practically speaking, the simple and obvious approach is to restrict those people to low-rights accounts. That won't stop them from running software that they download to their user profile, but it will prevent many installers and most malware from working, and it will make it easy to clean up any mess they happen to create.
http://google.com/search?q=windows+kiosk+mode
e.mote said:
http://google.com/search?q=windows+kiosk+mode
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When you're trying to be a smartass, at least make sure you are referring to the right thing.
Thanks for reminding me why I rarely bothered with helping online peeps. Some have enough manners to actually acknowledge the help. Most will just get what free help they can and never reply. A few special cases turn out to be a-holes who think they deserve the red carpet VIP treatment, and start lipping off if they don't get it. Guess which category you fall into?
If you had actually expend the two seconds to click on the provided link before flapping your lips, then the kiosk mode fits what you're describing, which is to lock down Windows to a few assigned functions. MS did put out a freeware called Steady State, but that's limited to Vista or older.
Then again, reading comprehension is getting to be a rarity in these parts. Damn twits...(get off my lawn...hahah)
Except, apparently, it's you who misread the request... or perhaps misread what Kiosk Mode in Win8.x does. It would be much *too* restrictive for the OP's needs, because it would prohibit using the desktop (or any of its software, such as Explorer or Word), or downloading Store apps (much less running them; it's limited to a preselected app). So, while perhaps the "smartass" reply was unwarranted (I remind you again that your avatar - showing a creature typically believed to be of sub-human intelligence rolling its eyes - will cause many people to automatically *assume* you're being a smartass even when you don't intend such) - you weren't actually being very helpful either.
With that said, OP, you really should search before posting; this exact question has been asked, discussed, and rejected as impractical before.
I read the request just fine. OP wants a way to restrict peeps from doing "bad stuff" on a Win8 box. Then, kiosk mode is a good key word to search on. There are others, of course, but noobs are only interested in being spoonfed, so I threw him a freebie to start out.
You should expand your knowledge. Kiosk mode (to lock down the PC) is a generic term that pertains to a variety of solutions, and not just the particular built-in Win8 solution you referred to. Locking down (public) PCs is a common need, and solutions abound. While Win8 has had very little new desktop software for it, Win7 does have a wide range of 3rd-party software, some of which undoubtedly have been upgraded to work with Win8. Shocker, there are actually more than one page of search hits.
BTW, I'm sick and tired of people (all two of them) casting aspersions on my avatar. It's a damn pic. I happen to like orangutans and think they're cool cats. Works for me, and if you don't like it, tough. So, do spare me the Dr Phil routine, before I start writing a dissertation on the irrelevant ramblings of someone who calls himself "GoodDaytoDie". When I want your 2 cents, I'll ask for it.
e.mote said:
Thanks for reminding me why I rarely bothered with helping online peeps. Some have enough manners to actually acknowledge the help. Most will just get what free help they can and never reply. A few special cases turn out to be a-holes who think they deserve the red carpet VIP treatment, and start lipping off if they don't get it. Guess which category you fall into?
If you had actually expend the two seconds to click on the provided link before flapping your lips, then the kiosk mode fits what you're describing, which is to lock down Windows to a few assigned functions. MS did put out a freeware called Steady State, but that's limited to Vista or older.
Then again, reading comprehension is getting to be a rarity in these parts. Damn twits...(get off my lawn...hahah)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh you are soooo helpful, providing me a link to a Google search that's not even the right thing. I think I said that I need them to use more than one app.
GoodDayToDie said:
Except, apparently, it's you who misread the request... or perhaps misread what Kiosk Mode in Win8.x does. It would be much *too* restrictive for the OP's needs, because it would prohibit using the desktop (or any of its software, such as Explorer or Word), or downloading Store apps (much less running them; it's limited to a preselected app). So, while perhaps the "smartass" reply was unwarranted (I remind you again that your avatar - showing a creature typically believed to be of sub-human intelligence rolling its eyes - will cause many people to automatically *assume* you're being a smartass even when you don't intend such) - you weren't actually being very helpful either.
With that said, OP, you really should search before posting; this exact question has been asked, discussed, and rejected as impractical before.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well then our resident Google expert should tell me the search string to Google, as whenever I search anything related to RT and exe, I just get RT jailbreak stuff.
e.mote said:
I read the request just fine. OP wants a way to restrict peeps from doing "bad stuff" on a Win8 box. Then, kiosk mode is a good key word to search on. There are others, of course, but noobs are only interested in being spoonfed, so I threw him a freebie to start out.
You should expand your knowledge. Kiosk mode (to lock down the PC) is a generic term that pertains to a variety of solutions, and not just the particular built-in Win8 solution you referred to. Locking down (public) PCs is a common need, and solutions abound. While Win8 has had very little new desktop software for it, Win7 does have a wide range of 3rd-party software, some of which undoubtedly have been upgraded to work with Win8. Shocker, there are actually more than one page of search hits.
BTW, I'm sick and tired of people (all two of them) casting aspersions on my avatar. It's a damn pic. I happen to like orangutans and think they're cool cats. Works for me, and if you don't like it, tough. So, do spare me the Dr Phil routine, before I start writing a dissertation on the irrelevant ramblings of someone who calls himself "GoodDaytoDie". When I want your 2 cents, I'll ask for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh yes, go ahead, call me a noob.
I know about various kiosk software, and I also know that there's always a way to get around it - some people literally turn off their antivirus software because the malware tells them to. Which is why I wondered about having an RT-style lock, without any visible toggles and switches to disable it.
And by the way I didn't look at your avatar at all, I just really don't think that pointing somebody to Google, or even worse, LMGTFY, is just rude.
Considering that this is a website where I got banned twice and flamed out of a thread because I mentioned ways to improve things in it, I expect other people to be nicer.
>Oh yes, go ahead, call me a noob.
OK, noob. Here's the thing. It's rude to expect people to be mindreaders, and start lipping off if they don't give you the exact answers you wanted. Did you say you already tried kiosk software? Hmm, no. Do you know that "kiosk mode" has a general meaning of locking down PCs, and kiosk software allows a variety of possible configurations? Hmm, not likely, considering your penchant of lip first and read later.
>I just really don't think that pointing somebody to Google, or even worse, LMGTFY, is just rude.
Wow, you DO expect manners, even though you have none to offer. Well, noob, reality check. Lots of questions are answered by simple search queries. If you think that's rude, then you should stop asking questions, because with your flipping people off when you don't like their answers, this thread will inevitably be the result.
>this is a website where I got banned twice and flamed out of a thread
Why am I not surprised. Going for a third?
>I expect other people to be nicer.
Right, it's always other people who need to be nicer, but you can be an a-hole because God has given you a lifetime license. Good luck with that.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=how+to+link+to+google+and+expect+to+be+called+a+saint
I think "RT-style" is specific enough to not require any mind reading. What YOU linked me to was not specific at all. But hey, it's the XDA tradition to call people noobs if they refuse to suck your ****, right?

Categories

Resources