Asus 3.1 Kernal release - when? - Eee Pad Transformer General

Asus was very quick about releasing their 3.0 kernal source. Anyone have any idea what the holdup is for the official 3.1 kernal? Are there any rumors as to when we will see it made available?

DOH! Read, then type.
No idea when they will release the source to the kernel.

They're probably trying to clean-up the hack job mess that resulted from them rushing to push 3.1 out, when it comes out, it'll probably be followed with another update.

frosty5689 said:
They're probably trying to clean-up the hack job mess that resulted from them rushing to push 3.1 out, when it comes out, it'll probably be followed with another update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, thats my thinking too, but it's just a guess on my part.

i rather not rush them with it, im sure there a reason behind the hold up, they have been doing alot of rushing for the consumer and if there working on a better kernel i say take there time, we have rooted 3.1 and also an over clock kernel for 3.1 already

cowballz69 said:
they have been doing alot of rushing for the consumer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They don't rush and consumers are outraged at the lack of support and slowness to push out a release that was announced a few weeks earlier.
They rush and consumers cry foul at the bugs of the rushed update.
:X

Itaintrite said:
They don't rush and consumers are outraged at the lack of support and slowness to push out a release that was announced a few weeks earlier.
They rush and consumers cry foul at the bugs of the rushed update.
:X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Welcome to the world of software development Everyone wants instant, bug free software that anticipates every possible need they could ever have and adjusts itself to what each user's expectation is. Until we developers can produce such a software package there will always be unhappy people

how much time do they have before they have to legally to post it?

finalhit said:
how much time do they have before they have to legally to post it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd say you can ask samsung that question.

finalhit said:
how much time do they have before they have to legally to post it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Legally they probably have no time.

I heard legally releasing open source is 30 days. When that clock started ticking I do not know.

3DSammy said:
I heard legally releasing open source is 30 days. When that clock started ticking I do not know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as i understand, the clock starts ticking as soon as someone asks for it. people are elligible to ask for it as soon as the binary is released.
so i guess it begs the quesion, did anyonee ask asus?
I don't need a signature.

finalhit said:
as i understand, the clock starts ticking as soon as someone asks for it. people are elligible to ask for it as soon as the binary is released.
so i guess it begs the quesion, did anyonee ask asus?
I don't need a signature.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would be surprised if a 30 day wait or needing to request something to start a clock was anything other than companies trying to weasel out of their obligations.

Related

Android 2.1 for the Eris

I heard some rumors flying around of a 22nd release date. Maybe this thread can organize all of that.
?
Yeah...we have all heard rumors and what not.....
Not sure there is anything we can organize or do...
Just wait until the 22nd and hope
My source at Verizon told me that via an internal email 2.0 is coming to the Eris at the end of January. They have not set a date for the release yet, but when they do, I will post an update for everyone.
acidbath5546 said:
Yeah...we have all heard rumors and what not.....
Not sure there is anything we can organize or do...
Just wait until the 22nd and hope
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I guess we just keep the thread open and see what happens.
I was given the Jan. 22nd date also from a Verizon Tech when I was having trouble authenticating my back in the beginning of December. She didn't say what the update would be though.
JTF2007 said:
I was given the Jan. 22nd date also from a Verizon Tech when I was having trouble authenticating my back in the beginning of December. She didn't say what the update would be though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The bugfix one. There is one scheduled for the 22nd, and it won't be 2.0/2.1.
ataranine said:
The bugfix one. There is one scheduled for the 22nd, and it won't be 2.0/2.1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Didn't they just do a bugfix a few days ago?
CPCookieMan said:
Didn't they just do a bugfix a few days ago?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was issued to fix one bug. The one where your phone locks up on you at the lockscreen and you have to pull the battery.
There's still one coming on the 22nd that fixes a lot of other bugs. It won't be 2.1.
ataranine said:
That was issued to fix one bug. The one where your phone locks up on you at the lockscreen and you have to pull the battery.
There's still one coming on the 22nd that fixes a lot of other bugs. It won't be 2.1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*sigh* I reject your reality and substitute my own.
CPCookieMan said:
*sigh* I reject your reality and substitute my own.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whatever you say.
ataranine said:
Whatever you say.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was a joke. You don't watch Mythbusters, obviously.
CPCookieMan said:
It was a joke. You don't watch Mythbusters, obviously.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't seen that show in a while. I love it though.
rooting 2.1 with sense on eris?
i hope i'm not the only one to think of this but:
if firmware 2.1 does come out on the 22nd of january, what does this mean to all the work done rooting firmware 1.5? because i'm pretty sure the problems with rooting the eris is not necessarily with fw1.5 but the sense UI thats layered on top of 1.5
even if 2.1 does come to the eris, it'll probably be a watered down version of fw2.1 because the hardware on the eris is not really optimized for 2.1 and it'll probably have a newer tweaked sense UI built upon the code from 1.5
i hope this is not a draw back but it's something to think about
It depends on the kind of attack we end up using. If we end up attacking the linux kernel directly, I doubt there will be time to plug the holes at this point. The bootloader / updater stuff, though, might be more risky, and I've been wondering about this for a while now. Guess we just have to wait and see which attacks come to fruition.
no kernel source code
i see what you're saying but htc hasn't released the source code for the kernel. i think thats what the senior members of this forum (acidbath5546, ataranine, rigmrt, etc.) are trying to get from htc through those emails. so the method of "attack" must be something else. unless of course those Mod edit: Employees at htc decide to allow us to use our devices the way we want
i'd love to contribute but i'm soo dame busy watching hulu, they've got some great stuff over there
Really, guy?
Either way, the way we're currently attacking it is like this: we know that a vulnerability was discovered on a certain date, and patched on a date after that. Fortunately, both of these dates are well after the date that the current version shipped, meaning that the target kernel must be vulnerable. Obviously this security flaw has been patched, and will do us no good in the future, but at least it's a start in our workflow.
yep
moqadasi said:
i see what you're saying but htc hasn't released the source code for the kernel. i think thats what the senior members of this forum (acidbath5546, ataranine, rigmrt, etc.) are trying to get from htc through those emails. so the method of "attack" must be something else. unless of course those Mod edit: Employees at htc decide to allow us to use our devices the way we want
i'd love to contribute but i'm soo dame busy watching hulu, they've got some great stuff over there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We have been trying...and Htc is sorta hearing us...
I just got word from someone at Engadget Mobile that Htc has heard us and seen the threads and emails..
And like they did on the Hero, they will release kernel code...its just a big machine over there...so we do owe them a bit of patience..
But it is good to know they heard..
Amazing what we can do as a community!
I will update as I hear more
moqadasi said:
i see what you're saying but htc hasn't released the source code for the kernel. i think thats what the senior members of this forum (acidbath5546, ataranine, rigmrt, etc.) are trying to get from htc through those emails. so the method of "attack" must be something else. unless of course those Mod edit: Employees at htc decide to allow us to use our devices the way we want
i'd love to contribute but i'm soo dame busy watching hulu, they've got some great stuff over there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Watch the choice of words you use towards other people of any race/color/creed/nationality
If that is impossible for you, we can help you
Mikey1022 said:
Watch the choice of words you use towards other people of any race/color/creed/nationality
If that is impossible for you, we can help you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow.. epic.
New HTC email...
"bigdroid" over at http://androidforums.com/members/bigdroid.html
just got this email from htc.
The update is scheduled for the first quarter of this year. Now while I can not definitively say any dates, I would expect it sometime end of January to mid February. Hopefully, this helps you.
Regards,
HTC Support

Sprint 2.1 Eclair Release (HTC Hero & Samsung Moment)

Here's some info that i got earlier today, thought I would share with everyone:
the 2.1 update will be OTW Only, and available from Sprint.com/Download once released.
File size for the HTC Hero will be ~117mb, and Samsung Moment ~80mb
Post 2.1 MRs will be OTA as long as sizes are within sprint's technical capabilities (9mb limit on OTA), Otherwise they will be OTA from Google or OEM sources.
Release dates:
Moment - April 30
Hero - Week of May 1
So keep your eyes peeled, and before anyone asks, the reason that the Hero update is being released after the Moment, is due to Sense implementation.
Enjoy!
added source in post 126: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=6351589&postcount=126
added source in post 385: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=6442453&postcount=385
wow. good new thanx!!
ThatGuyFromSprint said:
Here's some info that i got earlier today, thought I would share with everyone:
the 2.1 update will be OTW Only, and available from Sprint.com/Download once released.
File size for the HTC Hero will be ~117mb, and Samsung Moment ~80mb
Post 2.1 MRs will be OTA as long as sizes are within sprint's technical capabilities (9mb limit on OTA), Otherwise they will be OTA from Google or OEM sources.
Release dates:
Moment - April 30
Hero - Week of May 1
So keep your eyes peeled, and before anyone asks, the reason that the Hero update is being released after the Moment, is due to Sense implementation.
Enjoy!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not this again xD
Yadda yadda yadda....I'll beleive it when I see it.........
this info is actually explained. better chance of it actually being true XD
MyDroidHax said:
Not this again xD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
chfields said:
Yadda yadda yadda....I'll beleive it when I see it.........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Say what you will, and be as negative as you want, it's information for your benefit.
HeroMeng said:
this info is actually explained. better chance of it actually being true XD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. Thx for the info(if its true), ThatGuyFromSprint.
It does not benefit us though. Don't gain anything from knowing how long we have to wait.
OtisFeelgood said:
I agree. Thx for the info(if its true), ThatGuyFromSprint.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's as true as it comes, i can't divulge my direct source without risking losing my job, and it's not worth it.
But, i'll say this, the info is a synopsis of information that TSS and ATS groups got as of yesterday concerning the update, and it comes from the development group. It's information we can give over the phone, but all we can say is that it's information from the development group working on the update.
abcdfv said:
It does not benefit us though. Don't gain anything from knowing how long we have to wait.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so if i was to say, that i knew the actual release date of the EVO, you wouldn't want that because it's of no benefit to you in the sense of preparation?
Once more...
ThatGuyFromSprint said:
Say what you will, and be as negative as you want, it's information for your benefit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's of no benefit as we've had 14,000,000,000 2.1 will be out threads....Just being realistic.....agian, I'll beleive it when I see it
Take the information as you will, i'll let the negativity mongers tear it apart as much as they want...
Those who appreciate the information, your welcome, and thanks for your support.
the rest of you, well, you know how that works.
As for this thread, my work is done here.
I wouldnt believe it if Dan Hesse himself came here to officially announce it. It will come, when it comes and not a second earlier. Hearsay wont make it happen any quicker.
ThatGuyFromSprint said:
...so if i was to say, that i knew the actual release date of the EVO...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, I'll bite:
when is the release date of the evo?
tstack77 said:
ok, I'll bite:
when is the release date of the evo?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This question is more important to me than the official release of the Hero's 2.1.
danknee said:
This question is more important to me than the official release of the Hero's 2.1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha I agree. I plan on switching to Evo as soon as it's released. ;o
danknee said:
This question is more important to me than the official release of the Hero's 2.1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i need your gif as a boot up.......
Of all people that post information or say anything about 2.1 release. This OP seems to actually know alot more then most. Read anything he has posted in the past, he has never once said some dumb rumor and all of his post are very intelligent.
I would say if anyone were to post information, i would take if from this guy above all others.
dondadah88 said:
i need your gif as a boot up.......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.mediafire.com/file/hijkzdottgh/dancing-boot-fresh.zip
dondadah88 said:
i need your gif as a boot up.......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just posted a flashable zip up here >> http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=6308567&postcount=110

|ONLY 2.2 THREAD ALLOWED!| Froyo Rumor Thread

Ok, based on a few suggestions, I am starting this thread as an Android 2.2 rumor thread for the Epic 4G. This is to be the ONLY thread complaining, whining, commenting, or asking about 2.2 on the Epic! Report all other threads about 2.2 rumors on the Epic and I'll merge them into this one. Also, repeat offenders who make more then one new thread about 2.2 outside this one will be infracted/and or banned for trolling. Thank you for your cooperation, and happy posting
Important info:
noobnl said:
my leaker said: sprint software group can't give him the tar because they are afraid to death about losing their job
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
noobnl said:
Code:
<Tortel> http://device.sprintpcs.com/Samsung/SPH-D700/DK28.rdf
<@Shabbypenguin> i was talking about the chipset, not the phones
<Tortel> ^^ it says we have 2.2
<Tortel> ( thats some file downloaded when you get a MMS)
<nonoo2> http://device.sprintpcs.com/Samsung/SPH-D700/EA17.rdf
<@Shabbypenguin> if dk28 was supposed to be final then why are people still using the nexus 1 keys in their roms?
* nonoo2 is now known as nonoo
<tanimn> validation failed.
<Tortel> ah damn, i didnt notice it was build based
<nonoo> http://device.sprintpcs.com/Samsung/SPH-D700/EA18.rdf
<@Shabbypenguin> yea just saw that nonoo
<@Shabbypenguin> 19 and higher fail
<nonoo> http://device.sprintpcs.com/Samsung/SPH-D700/EB07.rdf
<!noobnl> yay!
<nonoo> http://device.sprintpcs.com/Samsung/SPH-D700/EB09.rdf
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
noobnl said:
You will not get data back if you flash EB01 modem from Fascinate!
There a workaround posted below
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
New rumor from android central
Froyo Feb 21 here
Another rumor for you
http://theurbandaily.com/Rumors/shamika-sanders/the-funniest-celeb-rumors/
Apparently singer "ciara" is a man
We'll wait and be disappointed again
Sent from my Epic P.O.S.
I just want to get everyone's hopes up again to watch us all get crushed. Its my new favorite thing. That, and bashing Sprint on twitter.
Gersonian said:
I just want to get everyone's hopes up again to watch us all get crushed. Its my new favorite thing. That, and bashing Sprint on twitter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sweet dude you bash them on twitter n i bash them on fb! theyre gonna take it from both ends...i mean from both social networking ends haha
We should all start calling Sprint and asking about this lol
Sent from my Epic P.O.S.
Woo! More unsubstantiated rumors.
With each failed attempt at guessing a release date, our chances of being correct on the next guess improve, right guys? Guys?
So EA17 means that it was completed on the 17th of January. So either they are clueless how to release this OTA without bricking devices or they are really testing the **** out of this one then. I hope its the latter case.
I feel like Charlie Brown going to kick the football. Surely Lucy won't pull it away again this time...
I think this one will actually be the one, theres already proof with that picture. Now Now, I know that it can be edited, but still, it seems like this date will be the one we were actually waiting for.
I just don't get it.
EA17... so it's already done.
It's not out because it's being tested.
So why is there a release date?
- If they know it's fine, it should be out already.
- If they expect it to fail, then how do they know it will be ready by a certain date?
If I had my way a lot would be different... but I don't understand how/why the final release will not be a build dated maybe a week before the actual release date, a date we will not know until it happens.
AndrewZorn said:
I just don't get it.
EA17... so it's already done.
It's not out because it's being tested.
So why is there a release date?
- If they know it's fine, it should be out already.
- If they expect it to fail, then how do they know it will be ready by a certain date?
If I had my way a lot would be different... but I don't understand how/why the final release will not be a build dated maybe a week before the actual release date, a date we will not know until it happens.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It makes perfect sense. They are going to test whatever they release for a while to make sure its polished. The rumor that AC received was probably that IF they dont find any major bugs in this version, it will be released on the 21st.
If they are so sure it's fine, they should release it now...
And if they DO find an issue, they'll disappoint everyone AGAIN.
This is nothing more than predicting the future, and they've been doing it poorly for 6mos now, why does Sprint think they'll get it right this time?
Releasing it at such-and-such date assuming all's well is what they have been doing since August.
AndrewZorn said:
If they are so sure it's fine, they should release it now...
And if they DO find an issue, they'll disappoint everyone AGAIN.
This is nothing more than predicting the future, and they've been doing it poorly for 6mos now, why does Sprint think they'll get it right this time?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sprint isn't leaking the rumors. It's individuals that work for Sprint who want to give us an idea of when we might expect it (then they find some bugs)... or just douchebags that want to throw out rumors for laughs. Again, Sprint doesn't say when they are releasing updates because that makes them look worse if it's buggy or they don't follow through.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
I am running 2.2, it has some issues, but works remarkably well. No FC's, and only slight screen rotation lag. So I can wait for Froyo... I am willing to wait because I want them to fix any and all bugs... Whether that be GPS, keyboard misses, screen rotation, whatever..
I am not a Sprint Lacky, have no stock in the company, but how people can get so emotionally attached to a software upgrade is beyond me. I can only imagine what people will be saying if they released a rushed buggy version.
Those of us that flashed the FroYo DK28 will still get this OTA if/when it comes out, right?
Still getting used to this phone. The Nexus One I used to have was a lot different.
I'd be happy with a new leak that's better than DK28 instead of "release dates" for froyo.
Sent from my Epic P.O.S.
edonnelly said:
I feel like Charlie Brown going to kick the football. Surely Lucy won't pull it away again this time...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't well all
Ryjabo said:
Those of us that flashed the FroYo DK28 will still get this OTA if/when it comes out, right?
Still getting used to this phone. The Nexus One I used to have was a lot different.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not exactly. You will have to flash stock DI18 for the OTA to come through and install. But I recommend waiting for our dev teams to get hold of it first to tweak it.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

ICS Confirmed for 2012

It's from Samsung Italy but they wouldn't be able to make such an announcement if it wasn't confirmed by Samsung corporate. And I'm sure that Italy isn't going to be the first and only CSC to get ICS.
http://sammyhub.com/2011/10/28/sams...droid-4-0-update-for-galaxy-s-ii-galaxy-note/
Really cool !
Not going to call BS just yet (I'm sure there will be ICS for the GT10), but it's just one blog quoting another blog. No links to anything official or from Samsung, and I did a quick search and came up with nothing from Samsung (just a bunch of blogs parroting these two, they all go back to the italian blog, though)....
slack04 said:
Not going to call BS just yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here's the original link in Italian. Learning from Amanda Knox, I'd doubt it would be said so empatically with Italy's slander laws if it weren't true. The original story also says "Q2" which sucks - that's six months away.
http://android.hdblog.it/2011/10/28...android-4-0-su-galaxy-s2-note-e-tab-nel-2012/
Lol if they didn't release it in 2012 it would be a big story.. Heck, anyone could have predicted 2012
Just waiting for cm9 sure they will come first
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk
Lets wait and see..
We'll probably get some custom ICS ROMs (assuming Google will release code on time) much much sooner than that.
BarryH_GEG said:
Here's the original link in Italian. Learning from Amanda Knox, I'd doubt it would be said so empatically with Italy's slander laws if it weren't true. The original story also says "Q2" which sucks - that's six months away.
http://android.hdblog.it/2011/10/28...android-4-0-su-galaxy-s2-note-e-tab-nel-2012/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing from Samsung there, just a blog saying something is so without any source. Like pngface said, the real story would be if they didn't release in 2012, but I think this is just a blogger making something up, then it's parroted all over the internet without anyone asking for a source. Maybe I should start a blog... (Also, "slander" doesn't mean what I think you think it means...).
http://galaxytablife.com/2011/10/sa...d-4-0-ice-cream-sandwich-for-galaxy-tab-10-1/
pkoper said:
http://galaxytablife.com/2011/10/sa...d-4-0-ice-cream-sandwich-for-galaxy-tab-10-1/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Another blog without a link to a press release, huh? The internet is full of people saying things... Anyways, everyone knows the GT10 will get ICS. The only question is when, and none of these blog posts, real or not, give us much info on that. CM9 will probably happen sooner anyways... or Task and Phantom will do it first!
One thing is sure, its getting closer and closer to release of ICS. Hopefully it will follow the normal procedure for Samsung. With leaked firmware being available thru out the web. If theres any truth in beginning of 2012 then it shouldnt be long before we start seing the first leaked firmwares. I remember on SGS when, Froyo i think, was released we started seing firmware coming a couple of months earlier.
slack04 said:
CM9 will probably happen sooner anyways... or Task and Phantom will do it first!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The devs are dependent on the drivers released by the OEMs. Existing kernels won't work with ICS so there can't be a fully functional custom ROM until there's a production ROM (or leak) from Samsung first.
slack04 said:
Another blog without a link to a press release, huh?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You kind of have to press the source button yourself.... and then translate...
http://translate.google.com/transla...e=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=101&oid=003&aid=0004143643
slack04 said:
Anyways, everyone knows the GT10 will get ICS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source? Press release?
pkoper said:
You kind of have to press the source button yourself.... and then translate...
http://translate.google.com/transla...e=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=101&oid=003&aid=0004143643
Source? Press release?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The "source" is "naver.com" which as far as I can tell is a korean blog, not Samsung. Jesus, I feel like I'm arguing against fox news watchers. Does anyone here understand the concept of "factchecking"?
slack04 said:
The "source" is "naver.com" which as far as I can tell is a korean blog, not Samsung. Jesus, I feel like I'm arguing against fox news watchers. Does anyone here understand the concept of "factchecking"?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They said it so it must be true lol
BarryH_GEG said:
Here's the original link in Italian. Learning from Amanda Knox, I'd doubt it would be said so empatically with Italy's slander laws if it weren't true. The original story also says "Q2" which sucks - that's six months away
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Q2 sucks,if it is true
Everyone needs to calm down. We will be getting ICS, it just depends on when.
I think a lot of people, at least in the US, are worrying because of the lack of updates we've gotten for the US Galaxy S models (I am one of them). Those are because of the carriers, not the manufacturer. The original Galaxy S (i9000) model got Gingerbread many many months ago.
Since the Tab (the Wifi models anyway) has nothing to do with a carrier, Samsung will provide the update. Good luck with the Verizon and TMO versions, although I'm sure there will be ports and not to mention CM9 for all of us.
Bottom line, don't worry!
MMcCraryNJ said:
Everyone needs to calm down. We will be getting ICS, it just depends on when.
I think a lot of people, at least in the US, are worrying because of the lack of updates we've gotten for the US Galaxy S models (I am one of them). Those are because of the carriers, not the manufacturer. The original Galaxy S (i9000) model got Gingerbread many many months ago.
Since the Tab (the Wifi models anyway) has nothing to do with a carrier, Samsung will provide the update. Good luck with the Verizon and TMO versions, although I'm sure there will be ports and not to mention CM9 for all of us.
Bottom line, don't worry!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is there any words that cm9 will be released for galaxy tab
slack04 said:
The "source" is "naver.com" which as far as I can tell is a korean blog, not Samsung.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source is newsis

Stupid ass Sprint and their stupid ass playbook?

As you can see by the title I am getting more and more disgruntled by the day.
I assume the playbook made no mention of GB this f'ing week?
.....I'm not sure how I am supposed to respond to this. There is no question. Or any way to know whether or not Sprint will drop GB. Hmmm
darkierawr said:
.....I'm not sure how I am supposed to respond to this. There is no question. Or any way to know whether or not Sprint will drop GB. Hmmm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it is going to drop isn't it mentioned in the PB?
Therefore the question is - Was it in the PB tonight?
Milkman00 said:
If it is going to drop isn't it mentioned in the PB?
Therefore the question is - Was it in the PB tonight?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it was, your title is going to look more retarded than it does already, and its already full fledged.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
muyoso said:
If it was, your title is going to look more retarded than it does already, and its already full fledged.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Speaking of retarded, look who it is. Pot, Kettle, Black.
Anyway - I qualified my title in the first line of my post. I am disgruntled and I am tired of the same old **** from Sprint/Samsung. No communication, late patches... Tired and disgruntled beyond belief. Hence the title.
Milkman00 said:
As you can see by the title I am getting more and more disgruntled by the day.
I assume the playbook made no mention of GB this f'ing week?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The guy that looks at the playbook and shares with us looks at it on Wednesday and shares on Thursday. Calm your damn nerves til tomorrow when we're told what he found out.
Sent from my SPH-D700
The Great Lonny from Charlie Brown!!!!
Milkman00 said:
Speaking of retarded, look who it is. Pot, Kettle, Black.
Anyway - I qualified my title in the first line of my post. I am disgruntled and I am tired of the same old **** from Sprint/Samsung. No communication, late patches... Tired and disgruntled beyond belief. Hence the title.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for being real. I feel the same way bro. I feel your pain. But I am not surprised. Maybe some of the guys can ask Lonny Claus for his version of gingerbread. I am on the naughty list so I won't be getting gingerbread but others who are on the nice list can or maybe we can wait for the Lonny Bunny but our best chance is to ask the Great Lonny next Halloween for gingerbread by that time we will have an official gingerbread while everybody else will be on Jellybean.
steveo314 said:
The guy that looks at the playbook and shares with us looks at it on Wednesday and shares on Thursday. Calm your damn nerves til tomorrow when we're told what he found out.
Sent from my SPH-D700
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks Steve. I didn't know that was the case. I thought several users here had access to it.
I am so disgusted with SamSprint it is disgusting. The worst part yet is that I feel that I have no options. I like Samsung technology (specifically the large AMOLED screen in combination with the physical QWERTY), but with attitude that Samsung and Sprint have in releasing software updates (the attitude of I got your money already), it is REALLY discouraging. I wish we had other options because I would GTFO of this phone QUICK and never buy another Samsung phone again.
ALSO, all of this in combination with Samsung and Sprint's complete lack of communication on the matter. No status updates, confirmations, NOTHING. SOOOOOOOOOO tired of this business model, and nothing on the horizon that looks better.
The Galaxy S is an awesome phone no matter which variant you have. Yes we don't get the up dates as quick as we should, I put it on the carriers(refer to the I9000 section on samfirmware and you'll see what I mean). If they'd let some members of xda do their updates they'd be a lot stablier and out faster.
Sent from my SPH-D700
jamice4u said:
Maybe some of the guys can ask Lonny Claus for his version of gingerbread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is pretty clear from all of the posts that I have read, that getting GB from his phone is nothing short of a lost cause.
That said, we shouldn't need to do this kind of reverse engineering crap to get the software off his phone to get it to the people that want it.
Milkman00 said:
It is pretty clear from all of the posts that I have read, that getting GB from his phone is nothing short of a lost cause.
That said, we shouldn't need to do this kind of reverse engineering crap to get the software off his phone to get it to the people that want it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is not going to happen.
Sent from my SPH-D700
Care to take your childish, complaining somewhere else? Try any android blog, or the sprint forums. This thread, and all of these supportive attitudes are asinine.
azyouthinkeyeiz said:
Care to take your childish, complaining somewhere else? Try any android blog, or the sprint forums. This thread, and all of these supportive attitudes are asinine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am sorry that you think it is ok for companies (Sprint/Samsung) to treat THEIR CUSTOMERS this way. You know, the same customers who pay the salaries of the employees of their respective companies???
I am also sorry that you don't find this ridiculous delay, and this non-communication as acceptable, and as something that doesn't warrant complaining.
Instead, you chose to complain about my post. Good use of your time. It is YOUR passive attitude which is what allows these exact delays to occur. GOOD JOB!
BACK ON TOPIC:
I guess it wasn't in the playbook this week?
Dude, for real? Grow up. We've gone this long without official GB, it's not like the phone is unusable without it.
algorhythm said:
Dude, for real? Grow up. We've gone this long without official GB, it's not like the phone is unusable without it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And that makes it ok!!!!
I simply don't understand how so many people think it is OK for a consumer to be treated this way by the company they are supporting. This is NOT OK. Instead of being passive about the entire situation, why not be more vocal???
Funny thing is, if you pacifists would actually read what I post, you would see that I am not even necessarily asking for GB tomorrow. I would be thrilled just to get some communication from these companies. Stop keeping the PAYING CUSTOMERS in the dark. Let us know what is going on.
If more people spoke up, maybe these companies would change their tune a little, but nooooooooooo, people are ok with not getting updates in a timely fashion, with no communication from the companies that will ultimately provide said update.
Unless GB is gonna make my phone physically do my job for me I don't see it as that big of a deal. The devs have made this phone kick ass but in essence its just a phone that's fun to mod. I just don't get all the anger. Besides that I'm running eh17 with one of the new kernels from source and it is running great. (Although it still doesn't do my job for me)
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Your complaing in a development fourm isn't going to do anything for you if your upset that sprint/samsung does not give you timely updates to your phone. Try complaining in the sprint/samsung fourms, it might help your cause a litttle more.
GituSum Epic
GituSum said:
Your complaing in a development fourm isn't going to do anything for you if your upset that sprint/samsung does not give you timely updates to your phone. Try complaining in the sprint/samsung fourms, it might help your cause a litttle more.
GituSum Epic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have personally written to both companies (actual paper and stamp). I am just one person. If more and more people did it (even just demanded communication), things would change.
rgregg504 said:
Unless GB is gonna make my phone physically do my job for me I don't see it as that big of a deal. The devs have made this phone kick ass but in essence its just a phone that's fun to mod. I just don't get all the anger. Besides that I'm running eh17 with one of the new kernels from source and it is running great. (Although it still doesn't do my job for me)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had to lol at the job still not being done for you. Now there's a real challenge for the devs.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Milkman00 said:
And that makes it ok!!!!
I simply don't understand how so many people think it is OK for a consumer to be treated this way by the company they are supporting. This is NOT OK. Instead of being passive about the entire situation, why not be more vocal???
Funny thing is, if you pacifists would actually read what I post, you would see that I am not even necessarily asking for GB tomorrow. I would be thrilled just to get some communication from these companies. Stop keeping the PAYING CUSTOMERS in the dark. Let us know what is going on.
If more people spoke up, maybe these companies would change their tune a little, but nooooooooooo, people are ok with not getting updates in a timely fashion, with no communication from the companies that will ultimately provide said update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Spoke up to WHO? XDA Developers forum?
And no one is keeping anyone in the dark. We weren't guaranteed ANYTHING. We have been getting leaks (read: unofficial builds), and that's it. Nothing has been announced. We'll get it when we get it. Were we even TOLD we were getting Gingerbread by both Sprint and Samsung? I don't think so. We are all speculating release dates, 2.3.x builds, playbook leaks, etc.

Categories

Resources