My HD2 will run stable clocked at 1.536Ghz; The maximum frequency allowable by SetCPU.
I don't remember HD2's normally running this fast. Not saying it hasn't been done just saying I remember people having problems past about 1.2Ghz. My last HD2 could barely break 1.1Ghz.
You have read on here about someone else who overclocked about that speed and their phone is now a nice paper-weight?
fred_up said:
You have read on here about someone else who overclocked about that speed and their phone is now a nice paper-weight?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I sure didn't @[email protected]! Do you have a link?
FireDemonSiC said:
My HD2 will run stable clocked at 1.536Ghz; The maximum frequency allowable by SetCPU.
I don't remember HD2's normally running this fast. Not saying it hasn't been done just saying I remember people having problems past about 1.2Ghz. My last HD2 could barely break 1.1Ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you will have a freaky-smelling-of-fried-mobo, very soon after running it at that speed.
matt
OCing 1st gen of snapdragon which use higher wattage and scaling to 1.5mhz is bad bad idea. Make stable profile for your mCPU with SetCPU with max: 1.2mhz/avg: 768mhz/idle: 640mhz you wont have any problems. Had no issue with HD2 OCed 24/7 for months with LeoCpuSpeed back when it was out. Just use common sense and don't OC if you don't need it.
Wow/ Thanks for all the words of warning guys.
Is this an issue with increased heat due to the higher wattage draw? Because one thing I have noticed strange about this HD2 is it seems to run alot cooler than my last one. My last one would get as hot as 104F. This one I can barely get to top 90F and a cool to the touch back of the phone confirms that.
Well more current = more heat, as its basically supplying more to scale the frequency. But my question is what is it that you do on your end that needs 1.5ghz OC? Top of that on HD2 thats insane, don't say you are gaming.
LOL not at all.
When you've been dabbling in overclocking since you were 14 and have gone as far as phase change cooling, you have an appetite to push things to their extreme limits.
I use to be like that lol held records in extreme overclocking forum but for my usage I hit my limit with quad core and stopped as any upgrade from then on for me is overkill as thats another matter not subjected to this forum.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Code:
O/S: openSUSE 11.2 (Linux 2.6.31.12-x86_64)
Case: APEVIA X-Plorer Metal Case (w/Side Window-Black LCD Temperature Display)
PSU: A-POWER AK 750 WATT ATX (20+4-pin w/SATA & PCIe)
Mobo: Asus M4A78 Pro (AMD AM2/AM2+ 780G/SB700)
CPU: AMD Phenom II X4 940 Black Edition (Deneb 3.0GHZ 45NM 125W)
MEM: 4x2GB OCZ Gold DDR2 SDRAM 800 (PC2 6400 1.8V 5-5-5-18CL)
GPU: GIGABYTE Radeon HD4350 512MB 64bit GDDR2/800MHZ (650MHZ 80SPU)
HDD: Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 250GB PATA133/UDMA6 (8MB 7200RPM 9.4MS)
DMR0: 2x Western Digital Caviar SE16 250GB SATA2/3.0Gbps (16MB 7200RPM 8.9MS)
DMR1: 2x Western Digital Caviar Blue 500GB SATA2/3.0Gbps (16MB 7200RPM 8.9MS)
NSS: 2x Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB SATA2/3.0Gbps (32MB 7200RPM 8.9MS)
ETH: Intel PILA8460C3 PRO/100 S Desktop (PCI-RJ45 10/100Mbps)
As you can see this server has been completely dismantled maybe when I have sometime ill bring this FServ online as I usually use to host 50k users. I was one of the 5 "HyperNode". Use to pull 3.5-4TB bandwidth my ISP was pissed as I had to build custom router/RAN server which ran on special ITX system p4 3ghz, 2gb ddr2 pc2700, 120mb pata just to cope with the high level traffic. Was around 3.2-3.3K tcp callback per sec and 3.5-4k udp callback per sec. So you could see how my ISP felt lol been offline ATM for close to year now.
Related
Sorry if there's a thread for it, but I haven't seen it. Let's see some benchmark's!
Nexus One:CM5.0.6, Pershoot 042310 OC/UV 1113.6 Kernel
BenchmarkPI - Best of 5
2519
Neocore - Best of 5
27.2
Benchmark - Average of three runs
Graphics:31.89
CPU: 781.35
Memory: 354.58
File System:84.1
Linpak : Search for "lostlocalhost.com" on this page for any of my runs
7.778
I had JIT running long enough and got an 18.992 (was #233 for all devices). Looking forward to when a stable JIT comes out.
Neocore - 1 Run
25.9
Benchmark - 1 Run
Graphics:28.53
CPU: 685
Memory: 341.24
File System:111.47
N1 w/ CyanMod 5.0.5.3.
GNja said:
Sorry if there's a thread for it, but I haven't seen it. Let's see some benchmark's!
Nexus One:CM5.0.6, Pershoot 042310 OC/UV 1113.6 Kernel
BenchmarkPI - Best of 5
2519
Neocore - Best of 5
27.2
Benchmark - Average of three runs
Graphics:31.89
CPU: 781.35
Memory: 354.58
File System:84.1
Linpak : Search for "lostlocalhost.com" on this page for any of my runs
7.778
I had JIT running long enough and got an 18.992 (was #233 for all devices). Looking forward to when a stable JIT comes out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn 2.2 is a hell of an improvement...
Tweaked a bunch of stuff and redid my benchmarks... I could probably squeeze a few more points out of these, but they;re still pretty damn high.
Quadrant:1636
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
BenchmarkPI:818
Linpack:42.963
NeoCore:29.3
Benchmark:
Graphics - 32.233852
CPU - 2743.6726
Memory - 336.75415
File Sys - 117.124115
Curious, when I run that quadrant benchmark test, on the video tests it shows my frames per second as so low, like 12 fps for a lot of the tests except for the last one with the rotating planet? Is the nexus that poor with video graphics? I'm running froyo and the final results show very high, like 1300. But why such low frame per second?
RogerPodacter said:
Curious, when I run that quadrant benchmark test, on the video tests it shows my frames per second as so low, like 12 fps for a lot of the tests except for the last one with the rotating planet? Is the nexus that poor with video graphics? I'm running froyo and the final results show very high, like 1300. But why such low frame per second?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nexus doesn't have the best graphic card, i think this will go to the droid.
Curious, when I run that quadrant benchmark test, on the video tests it shows my frames per second as so low, like 12 fps for a lot of the tests except for the last one with the rotating planet? Is the nexus that poor with video graphics? I'm running froyo and the final results show very high, like 1300. But why such low frame per second?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a stress rendering test. On some pc benchmark tests even the best pc.s produce 1-10 FPS
Linpack: 40.398 (0.13 seconds)
Benchmark Pi : 954 milliseconds
Neocore : 29.0
Quadrant : 1630
Build: FRF50 stock
Kernel : Linux msm 2.6.32.2 android.git source; UV, +21MB RAM
Speed : Stock, 998.4 MHz
Hint: To get better result.
Using SetCPU, set min cpu speed to maximum, and set cpufreq governor to performance.
NOTE: No process or task being killed or harmed during the benchmarking
TQ
my neocore benchmark was 29.3 and the second test was 29.1
my buddies mt Slide had 29.7 and 29.3..yikes lol.
I have herd that the Slide had the best GPU of any android phone in the US as of now. Its so weird.
I have a problem,my nexus 7 (as the title suggests) will not pass 59 fps. I've tried various roms,kernels and tweaks.
I'm not New to android and my sensation gets 70+ fps benchmarking, anyone know of any reason for my woes?
Getting really annoying to be honest. My sensation is ranked #1 in its device section of antutu and I want to push the nexus just as far
bonesy said:
I have a problem,my nexus 7 (as the title suggests) will not pass 59 fps. I've tried various roms,kernels and tweaks.
I'm not New to android and my sensation gets 70+ fps benchmarking, anyone know of any reason for my woes?
Getting really annoying to be honest. My sensation is ranked #1 in its device section of antutu and I want to push the nexus just as far
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats how it is, 59fps is the limit. kernel developers can raise the panel frequency, which can raise the fps to 109. but its not real, so they stopped doing that. what was your highest antutu, i bet i beat it with my n7. anyways, your 59fps on your n7 is is better than what you get on your sensation, you failed to take in account screen size, more pixels to push.
Thanks for the reply, i get 8229 with my sensation clocked at 1836mhz and with my N7 clocked at 1800mhz i get 9815 on antutu. Seems a bit naff to be quite frank, my dual core phone can nearly bench the same as the Tegra quad. I found some kernels with the fps limit disabled and i still only get 59 fps
bonesy said:
Thanks for the reply, i get 8229 with my sensation clocked at 1836mhz and with my N7 clocked at 1800mhz i get 9815 on antutu. Seems a bit naff to be quite frank, my dual core phone can nearly bench the same as the Tegra quad. I found some kernels with the fps limit disabled and i still only get 59 fps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i get 12000-16000 on antutu depending which kernel im using(and cpu speed), at 59fps. but its the screen size really that is the difference. and antutu isnt a good benchmark for graphic performance. its outdated and the test itself limits the scores.
here, nearly twice your sensation.. id say youre using the wrong rom/kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Thats more like what i expect the score to be like! Just to check without starting a thread.... Is the latest bootloader 3.34?
To be fair i am severely disappointed with this device, never had any problems with any if the HTC devices and within 3 days of owning this the micro usb cable has fallen apart, the screen has lifted in one corner and is displaying stress marks on the LCD trying to contact google or asus is becoming a stressful task.
What ROM is eveyone using? I'm guessing cyanogenmod??
I just run stock. It doesn't matter what rom/kernel I wind up running, it never seems to be as stable in the long term as the stock setup. Since I have bought my N7 I have flashed a ton of roms to it, when heading back to stock for a while out of boredom I found that I have an up time of well over a month now. I never got that lucky with custom roms after a week or two I always had to reboot it because of random issues including lagging and slow performance, to apps misbehaving.
Anyone else? I got 67,240 in 64bit mode on first and over 68k in 2nd. Finally figured out the screen shot.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
aaronc_98 said:
Anyone else? I got 62,740 in 64bit mode.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW....Screenshot?
Hrm... that's actually a little on the low side compared to some of the numbers it was putting up on review units. Most of those I saw were hovering around 70,000.
Definitely curious to see what other folks pull.
aaronc_98 said:
Anyone else? I got 62,740 in 64bit mode.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not brave enough to install that unsigned apk. I did score almost 58k in the standard antututu. Too be honest both these numbers are a lot lower then what I was thinking. Most of the results were on par with the exynos 5420 other then the mali gpu which scored nearly 20k (double the 5420 mali). Even the storage io numbers weren't radically different Despite their claims of high performance internal storage.
Anyways benchmarks usually only tell a small part of the story and there could be other things at play here that I have yet to discover. I'm hoping we see kernel source for this device soon.
I think this kind of benchmark is more useful and interesting as it correlates with something in real-life, like actual use of the device:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHb6IlmmV2o
Here's mine for those that care.
Do you have any battery temperature readings when running the Antutu?
Hehe, I see there was a typo in your original measurement
Good stuff. Looks like the retail units are definitely up to snuff. Keep em coming guys.
Poetique said:
Hehe, I see there was a typo in your original measurement
Good stuff. Looks like the retail units are definitely up to snuff. Keep em coming guys.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I went back and edited it cuz I saw I'm a bit dyslexic apparently...
this was the very first run in 64 bit mode, non 64 bit was 64508,
67282 with 64bit, sorry that is such a large screenshot
Here is my score, with all my apps installed 37+!
iGordy101 said:
Here is my score, with all my apps installed 37+!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It really is a beast! My friend has this phone, but I have the HTC M9 and it only gets 60927 on AnTuTu. In fairness though, the CPU only goes up to 1.5 GHz on little core + 2.0 GHz on the big core while Exynos has it 1.6+2.2 and 20 nm process
theveterans said:
It really is a beast! My friend has this phone, but I have the HTC M9 and it only gets 60927 on AnTuTu. In fairness though, the CPU only goes up to 1.5 GHz on little core + 2.0 GHz on the big core while Exynos has it 1.6+2.2 and 20 nm process
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah man, this is really a beast and so beautiful!
theveterans said:
It really is a beast! My friend has this phone, but I have the HTC M9 and it only gets 60927 on AnTuTu. In fairness though, the CPU only goes up to 1.5 GHz on little core + 2.0 GHz on the big core while Exynos has it 1.6+2.2 and 20 nm process
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the qualcomm 810 is 20nm process, exynos is 14nm
Everything stock, out of the box
lowest i scored is 67.5k, highest is around 69.5
---------- Post added at 10:45 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:43 AM ----------
And on a better day
Andi1000 said:
Everthing stock, out of the box
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I think I got the highest score than any phone I ever owned on stock out of the box near 80000 hahah I was so scared lol
Out of box, playstore app full update, latest ITV (Vodafone) update
Hello thought I would share some pics and my build specs....
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Specs:
Keyboard: CORSAIR - K70 RGB MK.2
Mouse: CORSAIR - DARK CORE RGB PRO SE
Case: CORSAIR - iCUE 220T
Motherboard: MSI X570-A Pro
CPU: Ryzen 7 3700x (OC to 4.2ghz)
Memory: CORSAIR - Vengeance RGB PRO 4x8GB 3200 (OC 3400)
Video: Geforce GTX 1080 FE
Monitor 1: Samsung 43" 4K
Monitor 2: HP 32" 2K
SSD1: Samsung 980 Pro 1TB
SSD2: Samsung 970 Evo 250GB
CPU Cooler: CORSAIR - iCUE H100i ELITE CAPELLIX CPU
Additional Fan: 2x Corsair LL Series 120mm
Wifi Card: Asus AX3000
Passmark Benchmark: https://www.passmark.com/baselines/V10/display.php?id=141447946253
Let me know what you think
Jesus thats one big monitor.
Tv monitor xd.
That gaming setup. In my opinion, is a very very very very expensive, rgbed and overpowered setup.
All you have left is an RTX or smth.
So... you just sit in front of that massive screen? Can you even see the whole thing at once?
inpression said:
So... you just sit in front of that massive screen? Can you even see the whole thing at once?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, yes. Both monitors are on full articulation mounts (up/down, left/right, back and forward, tilt). They can stick out 2.5 feet or sit flush to the wall so I can move them around. I usually have the monitor further back than in the pic but I wanted to get as close a grouping as possible when I took the picture.
If the 43" is as close as it is in the picture then that is too big but when I put it back about 9 inches its perfect for me. My eyes are not that good so if I dont have my glasses with me I can still see
Kenora_I said:
Jesus thats one big monitor.
Tv monitor xd.
That gaming setup. In my opinion, is a very very very very expensive, rgbed and overpowered setup.
All you have left is an RTX or smth.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah, I dont really game. I play Forza from time to time. I just like the LED's and how they look. Lots of options with the Corsair lighting.
Hmm then it would be good for coding i guess.
Wow, love the screens and the overall theme of your setup. I've gradually warmed up to the use of so many LEDs in PC setups.
Looks neat, cable management is well done.
Now I do not like so much RGB, I would prefer to see what theme is your personal preference, but well that is a matter of personal taste.
The monitors are too big at for this sitting distance, I think you would have a nicer experience with 3 smaller monitors (not small just smaller), or doing a setup in which your monitor is set farther away, maybe with a couch in from of it, but still visible from your working desk, this would require a whole setup modification and changing the placement of your desk tho (I have seen this kind of setups).
All in all, neat as I said before, but think about the 3 monitor smaller monitors setup, I think that setup would make your work or gaming more pleasant.
Scott said:
Hello thought I would share some pics and my build specs....
View attachment 5366077
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow! This looks great.
love it, congratulations
how much do you spend on this PC?
- MSI B450M VDH-Pro Max
- Ryzen 5 3600
- GIGABYTE GeForce® RTX 2070 SUPER™ GAMING OC 8G
- Neo Forza Faye 16GB 3200mhz
- Crucial P5 NVMe M.2 SSD 500GB
- WD Blue 2TB
- Straight Power 11 750w
- Be Quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
- Be Quiet! Pure Wings 2
- Dell S2721DFG
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Nice touch with the cards and the dice. Didn't you have any poker chips?
Is that humongous monitor really mounted on a single point? I really like two points, I don't like booble-headed displays.
The PC is nice and clean, but I always go for the minimum of wasted space.
There really should be a better scheme (in general) for the retention of the back end of PCI cards. The flippy clips are not really secure and don't do anything for the top corner.
AusVGM said:
- MSI B450M VDH-Pro Max
- Ryzen 5 3600
- GIGABYTE GeForce® RTX 2070 SUPER™ GAMING OC 8G
- Neo Forza Faye 16GB 3200mhz
- Crucial P5 NVMe M.2 SSD 500GB
- WD Blue 2TB
- Straight Power 11 750w
- Be Quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
- Be Quiet! Pure Wings 2
- Dell S2721DFG
View attachment 5406819
View attachment 5406821
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i swear i saw this for sale on FB marketplace, same dice and cards as the gpu support
WillisD said:
i swear i saw this for sale on FB marketplace, same dice and cards as the gpu support
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn, that's spicy. Definitely a different build though, I don't have/use Facebook. Spooky for sure.
Renate said:
Nice touch with the cards and the dice. Didn't you have any poker chips?
Is that humongous monitor really mounted on a single point? I really like two points, I don't like booble-headed displays.
The PC is nice and clean, but I always go for the minimum of wasted space.
There really should be a better scheme (in general) for the retention of the back end of PCI cards. The flippy clips are not really secure and don't do anything for the top corner.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No poker chips but is a nice idea, might have to go out and get some.
I used to have a 24" 1080p display and since upgrading the monitor haven't gotten around to swapping out the arm from the little one I have there. It does support 27" but I want you get something beefier like you suggested.
Thanks for the feedback!
if you haven't already done so, can i recommend you try ctr 2.1rc5 to overclock your ryzen ?
my build has the same cpu, with 2x8gb b-die ram running at 1800 (3600)
the clocking software has 4 out of 6 cores managing to hit over 4.6ghz, with the weaker 2 hitting a mere 4.38 at peak, with maximal vcore never above 1.375v, and usually way less
runs ~ 10c cooler than the stock settings, and way faster
it's a beautiful thing...
AusVGM said:
Damn, that's spicy. Definitely a different build though, I don't have/use Facebook. Spooky for sure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or someone jacked that photo and trying to scam someone, see it all to much
Thsnks
Is it quiet?
svetius said:
Is it quiet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, it's pretty quiet. I need to replace the back fan to match the others in the front as it's the only one I can hear and gets loud at the same rpm. Once I put my closed backs on I can't hear a thing.