Database Users

2.2 ROM Comparison

So,
Just compared most of the versions found here, before I start on my own work, I thought stuff it, do it. Here is the outcome:
XXJPM - Stock
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 994
OCLF - 1845
RAM - 114/304
XXJPK - Stock
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 1025
OCLF - 1917
RAM - N/A
Tayutama Edition v1.0.0 [I9000XXJPM] 14/10/2010
Lite
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 748
OCLF - Does not work
RAM - 139/304
Full
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 951
OCLF - 1830
RAM - 132/304
Doc's RomMod Froyo V1 (JP6-base / JPM-kernel) 13/10/10
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 875
OCLF - N/A
RAM - 113/304

Thanks for your work!

Doc's RomMod Froyo V1 (JP6-base / JPM-kernel) 13/10/10
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 875
A little lame, my voodoo'ed stock Eclair got sth. around 2000, gonna OCLF 2.2 now.

nitr8 said:
So,
Just compared most of the versions found here, before I start on my own work, I thought stuff it, do it. Here is the outcome:
XXJPM - Stock
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 994
OCLF - 1845
RAM - 114/304
XXJPK - Stock
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 1025
OCLF - 1917
RAM - N/A
Tayutama Edition v1.0.0 [I9000XXJPM] 14/10/2010
Lite
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 748
OCLF - Does not work
RAM - 139/304
Full
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 951
OCLF - 1830
RAM - 132/304
Doc's RomMod Froyo V1 (JP6-base / JPM-kernel) 13/10/10
Quadrant Score:
Clean - N/A
OCLF - N/A
RAM - 113/304
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Put in Sztupy's experimental ROM too the one that says NO RFS, its pretty good. I got a linpack 20+ & Quadrant 2000+ pre-rooted, NO LAGFIX.

ragin said:
Put in Sztupy's experimental ROM too the one that says NO RFS, its pretty good. I got a linpack 20+ & Quadrant 2000+ pre-rooted, NO LAGFIX.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sztupy's has an experimental lagfix included. (The lagfix is the whole point of the rom)

Vanilla JPA - Quadrant - 999
RAM - 113MB

RyanZA said:
Sztupy's has an experimental lagfix included. (The lagfix is the whole point of the rom)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's strange that we call the replacement of a filesystem "lagfix"

This obsession with Quadrant scores is stupid and very misleading. We already know that loop filesystems artificially inflate Quadrant scores even though the device isn't much faster (i.e. OCLF on top of Voodoo gives you 2500 Quadrant but performance isn't truly improved).
It can be useful for doing base comparisons, but it just ends up confusing everybody and perceverating about a number instead of actual performance in the real world and smoothness.
Personally I'm waiting for Voodoo b5.
I'm currently using Doc's Mod for JPM/JP6 and I got 1030 Quadrant with no lagfix. Not sure why the OP said it wouldn't run.

with the same rom, if you run the quadrant test several times, the score varies...
all froyos are scoring about 900 - 1050 without LagFix and 1800 - 2000 with lagfix

chambo622 said:
this obsession with quadrant scores is stupid and very misleading. We already know that loop filesystems artificially inflate quadrant scores even though the device isn't much faster (i.e. Oclf on top of voodoo gives you 2500 quadrant but performance isn't truly improved).
It can be useful for doing base comparisons, but it just ends up confusing everybody and perceverating about a number instead of actual performance in the real world and smoothness.
Personally i'm waiting for voodoo b5.
I'm currently using doc's mod for jpm/jp6 and i got 1030 quadrant with no lagfix. Not sure why the op said it wouldn't run.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+10000000 :d

Imo none of these benchmarks are able to really rate the overall perfomance of the different firmwares...
Reminds me a bit of DirectX-Benchmarks, same show but different artists

chambo622 said:
This obsession with Quadrant scores is stupid and very misleading. We already know that loop filesystems artificially inflate Quadrant scores even though the device isn't much faster (i.e. OCLF on top of Voodoo gives you 2500 Quadrant but performance isn't truly improved).
It can be useful for doing base comparisons, but it just ends up confusing everybody and perceverating about a number instead of actual performance in the real world and smoothness.
Personally I'm waiting for Voodoo b5.
I'm currently using Doc's Mod for JPM/JP6 and I got 1030 Quadrant with no lagfix. Not sure why the OP said it wouldn't run.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well it actually does give what it says and it's no quadrant error. It's just that probably no app other than a badly coded touch wiz launcher will ever need a faster memory.
Try noticing differences on your system with a 5600RPM HDD and a 7200HDD.
You won't feel any difference and only benchmarking software will be able to tell.
However if it's possible (because rfs is a crappy file system) why not replace it?
It's like going from FAT32 to NTFS, it's there, it's better so why not use it?

^^ welcome after, there's like three mods trying to accomplish right now..
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

Post Your Quadrant Benchmark Scores! (HD2)

Hey everyone. Please Benchmark using Quadrant and Post your Score along with a screen shot or picture of your score.
Also please state if you tested your phone under default stock conditions, or if you rooted and tweaked the heck out of it to get the high score you got.
You can download Quadrant. Go To Android Market and search Quadrant.
MY Score : 2799
i can't upload the pic now
1.To prevent spam to the forums, ALL new users are not permitted to post outside links in their messages. After approximately eight posts, you will be able to post outside links. Thanks for understanding!

I am running CM 6.1 Stable and getting about 2300-2350 quadrant score (setCPU scaling between 245 and 1200). What are you running to get 2800?
Edit: Had weather bug running in the BG, now getting around 2500.

That's the highest quadrant score I've EVER seen from any first gen. Snapdragon device. What do you have it overclocked to? On my mt4g (second gen snapdragon with dedicated gpu) overclocked to 1600mhz on a deodexed, zip aligned rom, I just barely go above 2800 on quadrant.
I had an HD2 and a Nexus and never came remotely close to those numbers on any rom/kernel/clock speed combination. I've messed with and flashed many Evos, overclocked within reason, that also average literally half of that.
Since your post count is 2 and youve already opened a 'bragging rights' type thread, I'm going to have to call BS on this. Sorry, I just call it how I see it. Or hey, maybe you're just the chosen one and have a magic phone.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App

I am absolutely thrilled with a score of 2500. I have been using a G1 for the past year and a half and I decided it was finally time to upgrade. My G1 was only getting about 580 with CM 6.1 (and that was an amazing score). I was debating whether to get a MyTouch 4G, G2 or an HD2 with the Android off the SD card. I was able to pick up an HD2 for $200 off craigslist and boy I do not regret it. I don't know how this phone can run Android off the SD card faster than off the nand, but I am thrilled. By the way I am using a Class 10 4 GB SD Card, if that makes much of a difference.
Only this I wish it could do is play my 720p videos without the codec getting all blocky/laggy. But that is probably asking way too much.

Is 2500 on stock clock speed? There must be some serious speed enhancements here recently, last I used a dual booted HD2 it was only in the 1300 range, same with my nexus, and two Evos. My nexus will max around 1800 with the miui rom overclocked to 1100mhz or so..Is there something special with the HD2's hardware that I'm missing or is this the norm now?
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App

I am using HD2ONE 0.3.4b based on CM 6.1 Stable (CM is awesome BTW). I am using setCPU to run the phone at 1190mhz clock, but it still gets great Benchmarks without. I have been using CM for about a year now on my G1. It is built for speed and memory improvements as these were necessities to keep my G1 alive and kicking up until now. I would assume anyone who can't break the 2000 point quadrant score might want to take a look at HD2ONE and CM.
PS.
Also, this is the T-Mobile HTC HD2, so perhaps the 1gb ram helps as well.

I still don't see the point in benchmarks. I used to have a build (it shall remain nameless) that got over 2400 in quadrant but the UI itself was slow as all hell. My current build (in sig) get's 1700 ish but is smooth as melted butter. I'd rather have a smooth OS than a cooked phone as well.

I'm not sure about your unnamed os but cyanogenmod is running smooth as butter
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App

Ok and yet again here we go.
Your scores are so insane high because of what apears to be bug in the benchmarking of the SD card. Your device is NOT ultra wtf pownage fast. Its nothing to boast about. Its just a glitch. I had a build that did 3100 and still the build from darkstone is 100% faster and only pulling 1600 points.
Benchmarks are fun to measure on devices that run off NAND not SD so for the love of god STOP the benchmark topics.

shuntje said:
Ok and yet again here we go.
Your scores are so insane high because of what apears to be bug in the benchmarking of the SD card. Your device is NOT ultra wtf pownage fast. Its nothing to boast about. Its just a glitch. I had a build that did 3100 and still the build from darkstone is 100% faster and only pulling 1600 points.
Benchmarks are fun to measure on devices that run off NAND not SD so for the love of god STOP the benchmark topics.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I knew it had to be something to do with Android running off the SD card and not NAND, those numbers are just insane for the setups. Thank you for clearing that up sir.

shuntje said:
Ok and yet again here we go.
Your scores are so insane high because of what apears to be bug in the benchmarking of the SD card. Your device is NOT ultra wtf pownage fast. Its nothing to boast about. Its just a glitch. I had a build that did 3100 and still the build from darkstone is 100% faster and only pulling 1600 points.
Benchmarks are fun to measure on devices that run off NAND not SD so for the love of god STOP the benchmark topics.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well it's not just a glitch. cedesmith's asynchronous data method actually does improve i/o by a huge amount. There are a few spots where the SuperRam build feels faster than the desire_hd2 and hd2one 3.4 but it's really not that big a difference. Plus the battery drain is not as good on the SuperRam.
This is one of the builds shuntje is talking about. Cedesmith's desire_hd2, running slightly overclocked at 1.19. No other tweaks.

I do not think that this result came from a gap in the program
my phone is so fast
now in benchmark >>> my socre is 2963 !!!!
add me in facebook and see the pic
facebook.com/home.php?#!/profile.php?id=100000362542194

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

buzz killington said:
Well it's not just a glitch. cedesmith's asynchronous data method actually does improve i/o by a huge amount. There are a few spots where the SuperRam build feels faster than the desire_hd2 and hd2one 3.4 but it's really not that big a difference. Plus the battery drain is not as good on the SuperRam.
This is one of the builds shuntje is talking about. Cedesmith's desire_hd2, running slightly overclocked at 1.19. No other tweaks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how did u get that high io score ?
i can barley get 5k at 1.2ghz
ish i get higher score with lower oc just 1.07ghz
overall without 2d/3d 2560
cpu 5800
io 5900
1.11ghz
overall without 2d/3d 2600
cpu 6400 io 5700

civicvx94 said:
Is 2500 on stock clock speed? There must be some serious speed enhancements here recently, last I used a dual booted HD2 it was only in the 1300 range, same with my nexus, and two Evos. My nexus will max around 1800 with the miui rom overclocked to 1100mhz or so..Is there something special with the HD2's hardware that I'm missing or is this the norm now?
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know the details, but recently I've noticed a bunch of people here posting quadrant scores in the 2100-2400+ range.
I score about 2000 @1.19 Ghz, but my build is quite a bit older than the new ones.
There definitely seem to have been some optimizations done in the most recent builds, especially the one by darkstone which does something like load the entire android filesystem in memory or something.
I'll have to try a newer build.

poweroutlet said:
I don't know the details, but recently I've noticed a bunch of people here posting quadrant scores in the 2100-2400+ range.
I score about 2000 @1.19 Ghz, but my build is quite a bit older than the new ones.
There definitely seem to have been some optimizations done in the most recent builds, especially the one by darkstone which does something like load the entire android filesystem in memory or something.
I'll have to try a newer build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most all the big numbers come from the i/o improvements. You'll know if you see the build uses cedesmith's initrd. Using asynchronous read/write improves performance but also has a higher chance of corrupting the data file.
Just off the top of my head, these builds all are using it: cedesmith's desire_hd2, hd2one, jdms, darkstone's superram also uses it for his build.

i am using HD2ONE ROM , latest version.. my quadrant score is 2200+..
after flushing 10-15 ROMs its first time i got 2200+
i m running Radio 2.15.50.xx

yha, benchmarks are great braging rights.
ive run roms that bench silly high, but ive also run roms that bench " slow" but in real workd performance kick the crap out of the " fast" roms.
atleast some one did a benchmark from the payed version so it breaks it all down, and shows actual usefull info...

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The reason its scoring so high is because of i/o. I believe that's the wrong metric to look at because i believe i/o is dependent on what memory card you have. If you pay attention to the other scores, all of these screenshots are right on par with the nexus one 2.2+. Still awesome, but don't brag that your benchmark is uber leet, as its probably the same or close to everyone else here regardless of build.
To test my theory, load the same build on another SD card, preferably one that has a lower class (lower read and write speeds) and then run the benchmark and post results.
I will also test a build with cedesmiths initrid explained earlier and post my results
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App

What's up with my bench scores?

I'm running Cyanogen Mod 7 v 2.5 Gingerbread on my HD2 which is clocked at 1.536Ghz.
Best quadrant score I could pull was 1418, with results being inconsistent every time I run the test.
Best score in linpack was 41 MFLOPS.
Best CPU bench score was 672ms.
Now, don't get me wrong. I know these scores are a def improvement over stock and nothing to sneer at, but I've seen HD2's that only run at 1.1 - 1.2Ghz with Froyo in the 1600+ Quadrant/60 MFLOPS+ CPU bench range.
I'm kinda stumped here. What's up?

Virtuous XooM v1.1.2 HC 3.2 Benchmarks very nice rom

I installed this rom the other day and so far everything works except the screen rotation lock button but no rom has that working.
Frst its HC 3.2 ported over from the xoom has the new feature of being able to upscall the smaller apps to the larger screen.
Over clocking is built in just get set cpu and off you go.
My acer is over clocked to 1.5 and here are my benchmark scores.
Useing Quadrant I got 3421 (best of three runs) and frame rates around 45
Useing Linpack I got 45.438 mflpos on single thread in 1.85 seconds and
71.53 mflops on multi-thread in 2.36 seconds again best of three runs
Useing AnTuTu Benchmark I got a score of 6159 and frame rates right at around 60 fps
Useing Vellamo (its new and a benchmark tool for a tablets browser to see how ell the browser performs does things like java and flash stress tests and load speeds of web pages) I got a score of 1072
These are the top 4 bench mark tools for android and these scores while may not look impressive are awsome. in comparisons on benchmark tools grafs these score are much higher them most tablets.
bottom line this tablet rocks.
If your into benchmarking and tweaking as I am please post your results here list benchmark toos used,scores and with rom your running and cpu speed. so we can get and over all view of this remarkable tablet.

I got 1291 from Vellamo using Stock 3.1 with custom Kernel Taboonay CPU 1408Mhz

same rom, same oc, similar scores XD this tablet does rock!!!!!!

bench score

Hello,
What is your bench score with QUADRANT BENCHMARK
the mine is 1550 with hc3.1 OTA, Villain_iconia_kernel_2.5 kernel

Quandrant Score : 3423
Acer Iconia A500
Villian_Iconia_Kernel 3.2
LightSpeed Rom
over clocked to 1.4ghz

MrTonyToca said:
Quandrant Score : 3423
Acer Iconia A500
Villian_Iconia_Kernel 3.2
LightSpeed Rom
over clocked to 1.4ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How does it get that high? Mine is oc. To 1.5 and my highest is 2100!
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA Premium App

monkey10120 said:
How does it get that high? Mine is oc. To 1.5 and my highest is 2100!
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know, It might be the Rom.....Its the newest version of the Light Speed Rom....OC'd to 1.4ghz using SetCPU Ondemand governer , with the Honey Villian_Iconia_Kernel 3.2, thats the highest I've gotten but since I've flashed both it has ranged from 2800-3300

[ROM][26/08]Lightspeed_1.0.2[HC3.2]
[KERNEL] Stock/HV/Taboonay V3.3 for HC 3.2 07-09 - 1.64Ghz/UV control

quadrant is very unreliable. to some searching on it, it is easy to manipulate I/O or other factors just get high scores. Doesn't really mean it is a great ROM/kernel combo. I've seen posts where people can get their quadrant score upwards of 20,000. All benchmarks apps have their pros and cons but from i've been told/seen in threads CF bench and vellamo seem to be the most reliable.

mburke178 said:
quadrant is very unreliable. to some searching on it, it is easy to manipulate I/O or other factors just get high scores. Doesn't really mean it is a great ROM/kernel combo. I've seen posts where people can get their quadrant score upwards of 20,000. All benchmarks apps have their pros and cons but from i've been told/seen in threads CF bench and vellamo seem to be the most reliable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've also tried Smartbench 2011, since it measures both cores instead of one and push around 4400 there.....Im loving the speed on this thing....