I'm running Cyanogen Mod 7 v 2.5 Gingerbread on my HD2 which is clocked at 1.536Ghz.
Best quadrant score I could pull was 1418, with results being inconsistent every time I run the test.
Best score in linpack was 41 MFLOPS.
Best CPU bench score was 672ms.
Now, don't get me wrong. I know these scores are a def improvement over stock and nothing to sneer at, but I've seen HD2's that only run at 1.1 - 1.2Ghz with Froyo in the 1600+ Quadrant/60 MFLOPS+ CPU bench range.
I'm kinda stumped here. What's up?
Most people on this forum have tinkerer with their xoom, and at some point ran quadrant and linpack. I'm curious as to who has the fastest benchmark xoom.
We all know benchmarks don't mean squat in the real world but its still cool to OC it and see what it will do.
So post up your quadrant and linpack scores and at what speed
Mine @ 1.6
Quadrant 4513, it ran 4517 however was unable to get a screen shot.
68.772 linpack. Ranks 124 of all devices
I got 4157 as my highest on quad (1.6 ghz) but I got a 69.4 on linpack (screenshot lost when I had to flash stock images to recover, also at 1.6 ghz) ( its a GIF, so the app doesn't like it)
http://db.tt/GQ8XznI
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App
This is kinda weird for a brag I guess, but I get 3758 on quadrant and 60 on linpack with the 1.4ghz 1.4.2 kernel.
Hi,
as i'm using my iconia a500 i noticed some heavy Performance issues. i rooted and installed several Roms but my Quadrant score keeps being low. right now i am on lightspeed 1.0.1 with Richard's Kernel and my Quadrant score is only 656!!!
i'm really curious about this any suggestions?
thanks in advance
kiark
Just a guess, but the cpu probably is not running full during the test. Might have to use a app to force to 1000 during the test.
Running 2.4 kernel? If so, the default intersctive scaling governor is borked so either use setcpu to change to on demand or flash back to 2.3. Im personally running 1.6ghz as max speed with on demand.
thank u very much, setting the cpu up with setcpu worked!
CPU really does not have much effect on quadrant score. It is the combination of the Rom and the kernel it self.
Sent from my SGS-t959 using XDA Premium App
IM using the xoom 3.2 rom
My acer is over clocked to 1.5 and here are my benchmark scores.
Useing Quadrant I got 3421 (best of three runs) and frame rates around 45
Useing Linpack I got 45.438 mflpos on single thread in 1.85 seconds and
71.53 mflops on multi-thread in 2.36 seconds again best of three runs
Useing AnTuTu Benchmark I got a score of 6159 and frame rates right at around 60 fps
Useing Vellamo (its new and a benchmark tool for a tablets browser to see how ell the browser performs does things like java and flash stress tests and load speeds of web pages) I got a score of 1072
naturallight said:
CPU really does not have much effect on quadrant score. It is the combination of the Rom and the kernel it self.
Sent from my SGS-t959 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not sure on this. if it doesnt have much effect why do you see such a huge difference between 216 Mhz and 1.5 Ghz clock speeds in quadrant?
My tf had been sitting in my drawer for a long period due to lag and choppy performance. However, recently i decided to browse the forum and found RaymanFX JB AOSP rom with Linaro enhancement and gave it a try. After trying his rom, i was shocked by the benchmark result because at some test it exceeds the speed on my GSIII (Browsermark result is around 180k and my GSIII scored around 150k). Here i attached my benchmark result.
You can see that in quadrant the cpu score is more than double than devices with same tegra 2 chipset. i am wondering is anybody get the same result with their tf?
Heres mine
on 1500mhz RaymanFX's Cynogenmod
These are the result of the benchmarks done to the kernels that are being developed (4 Apr 2013) for the Samsung Galaxy Note 2 .
The settings used are the default that come with N7100XXDMB6 on a GN2 baseband N7100XXDLK7. The changes from the stock areas follows , rooted, TWrecovery 2.3.3.2 , 240 dpi. Brightness used during test 100 %, WiFi on, Nova Launcher Pro, Force GPU rendering (enabled) under Developer options, Power saving option OFF, GPS off , Screen rotation on, sound on 100%, multiwindow active.
Kernels used Stock mb6, Perseus 34.2, Adam 2.2.1 , Neak 1.7
Applications used 3dMark 1.0.0-875 , RL Benchmark:SQLite 1.3 , Vellamo 2.0.2 , CF-Bench 1.2 , AnTuTu Benchmark 3.2.2 , PowerTutor 1.4
Addition applications Linpack for Android 1.2.8, Pi Benchmark 1.0, Quadrant Standart 2.1.1, Geekbench2 2.4.2, SD Tools 3.0.
Methodology used : The benchmarks were run in sequence 1 minutes after a clean reboot was done (cleaning cache and dalvik-cache).
Explanation about the results,
3dMark has 2 scores the first is the normal and the second the extreme suite (Higher is better).
RL Benchmark:SQLite measures the time in seconds needed to dullfill the tests incuded ( smaller is better).
Vellamo has two scores first is HTML5 and second is the metal suite score ( Higher is better).
CF-Bench has three scores first is native score, second is java score and third is overall score ( Higher is better).
AnTuTu just the overall result ( Higher is better).
PowerTutor measures the power usage in milliWatt for the last 5 minutes ( smaller is better).
Linpcack for Android measures floating point performance of the system , has two numbers first is single thread second is multi threaded score in Mflops (higher is better).
Pi benchmark measures the time in seconds to calculate pi, I settled for 200 000 numbers ( smaller is better).
Quadrant Standart 2.1.1 ( higher better).
Geekbench2 2.4.2 cross platform bench ( higher better).
SD Tools measures the read and write speed in Mb/s from the sdcard, first number is writting speed second is read speed (higher better).
Results :
Stock MB6
3dMark 3339x2502
Sql 14.837
Vellamo 1763x610
CFbench 26604x7402x15082
Antutu 16979
Powertutor 803 mW
Perseus 34.2
3dMark 3034x2305
Sql 14.482
Vellamo 1743x612
CFbench 26027x7407x14855
Antutu 17140
Powertutor 816
Adam2.2.1
3dMark 3203x2421
Sql 20.406
Vellamo 1776x619
CFbench 26253x7423x14955
Antutu 17311
Powertutor 805
Neak 1.7
3dMark 3199x2432
Sql 15.855
Vellamo 1710x624
CFbench 26934x7558x15308
Antutu 15911
Powertutor 810
Stock MB5
3dMark 3312x2476
Sql 14.54
Vellamo 1753x610
CFbench 25915x7355x14779
Antutu 17268
PowerTutor 807 mW
Stock MC3
3dMark 3282x2474
Sql 15.181
Vellamo 1768x599
CFBench 26544x7652x15208
Antutu 17024
PowerTutor 502 mW
Linpack 64 x 211
Pi 200 000 53.67
QuadrantS 6991
Geekbench 2059
SD Tools 6.0x12.5
Abyss 2.3.1
3dMark 3200x2387
Sql 14.334
Vellamo 1740x619
CFBench 25870x7077x14595
Antutu 16780
PowerTutor 500 mW
Linpack 62 x 68
Pi benchmark 53.29
QuadrantS 7149
Geekbench 2105
SdTools 6.2x14.9
RedPill 1.42
3dMark 3145x2379
Sql 16.854
Vellamo 1502x618
CFBench 25297x7373x14542
Antutu 16927
PowerTutor 501 mw
Linpack 62x129
Pi benchmark 53.12 s
QuadrantS 6635
Geekbench 2005
SdTools 6.4x12.8 Mb/s
Devil 0.12
3dMark 3177x2315
Sql 14.668
Vellamo 1744x604
CFBench 24850x7335x14341
Antutu 17227
PowerTutor 508
Linpack 64x124
Pi benchmark 53.79
Quadrant S 6661
Geekbench 1696
SdTools 5.8x12.6
The intention of these test is to show the devs their strength/weakness regarding the benchmarks area. These benchmarks are purely synthetic which means they DO NOT represent real life scenario usage.
I am opened to every suggestion possible for further monthly or bimonthly benchs.
Edit: For accuracy have to clarify that about the difference in results with PowerTutor due to removing of an application that used exactly 300 mw the results of the recent test show 300 mw less than the previous ones.
Adam Kernel
Thanks, good job
Would you prefer the Adam Kernel ?
dianlb50 said:
Thanks, good job
Would you prefer the Adam Kernel ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock has given me no problems so far, it seems it gives a perfect middle point for my usage, as for the optimizations done to specific kernels, the efforts of the dev is not well represented in the results of such simple bench tests bcs the results are within margins of error of such test, but again have to stress out that these are purely synthetic benchs therefore DO NOT apply to real life scenarios.
Here you go fully stock non-rooted xxDMB5.
hagba said:
Here you go fully stock non-rooted xxDMB5.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Added results for the Stock MB5 on the OP.
Added results for Stock MC3 , RedPill and Abyss kernels. plus some additional benchmark tools.
Stock DMB5, Perseus Kernel
@ 1.8 ghz.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
The point of the tests is to compare the kernels performance side by side in the same environment/setup in MY device, using the DEFAULT settings (no tweaking or OC) with which they are delivered to end user, and if you are careful to notice, I have included MORE than just a simple Antutu result aiming to be as close as possible to real usage scenarios.
abauer said:
The point of the tests is to compare the kernels performance side by side in the same environment/setup in MY device, using the DEFAULT settings (no tweaking or OC) with which they are delivered to end user, and if you are careful to notice, I have included MORE than just a simple Antutu result aiming to be as close as possible to real usage scenarios.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My bad, but the OP is TL;DR.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
ThankS for posting
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Added Devil kernel results.
Perseus 35
Geekbench
Quadrant
Sql
Antutu
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2