Database Users

disco custom kernel [v.b01]

After some days of testing the new kernel I decided to share it with everyone,
Now just to make things clear, the disclaimer:
Use it at your own risk, If you are unsure of what you are doing please do not flash this kernel.
As a rule of thumb ALWAYS do a nandroid backup first. I will not be responsible for any damage you may get and
I'm almost sure that flashing this boot image will void your warranty, but if you are reading this forum certainly you already did it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ATTENTION:
If you flash 1GHz and have issues please use 768MHz instead.. It seems that not all liquids are stable at 1Ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's available in two versions for the ROM 2.000.16, 1GHz and 765Mhz.
Search the files in here.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Features:
Code:
1Ghz
Multitouch (many thanks to Luke Hutchison for all his work and help) [for now, only with Dolphin Browser]
Works very well with clean ROM 2.000.16, installed with acer tool.
Bootloader info is:
Code:
USB FastBoot: V1.00.03
HW version: v0.4
AMSS version: A1-02.01.03
Build Date: Jan 26 2010, 14:29:43
Instructions:
1. Read the disclaimer.
2. Do a nandroid backup.
3. Download and unpack the zip file.
4. Enter bootloader.
5. Do in console/cmd:
Code:
fastboot -i 0x0502 flash boot <boot image name>
fastboot -i 0x0502 reboot
6. Have fun
I didn't posted the unrooted version because when you flash this kernel you will be voiding your warranty (if you already didn't), so doesn't make sense to keep your phone unrooted, unless you really want it.. If thats the case, contact me..
As you may know, this was build from a kernel source that has some bugs on it, so, you may experience some erros.. Didn't found any, but if you find please report..
Dmesg will output some errors, but for now they are armless..

GREAT WORK!
Havn't tested it out yet, gonna do it after tomorrow since I need my phone at work tomorrow.
Is there a noticeable speed-difference when using the 1ghz-version?

Nice work mate!
I'm using the 765Mhz version without any problem. Can anyone tell if the 1GHz causes the phone to overheat?

brumbrum said:
GREAT WORK!
Havn't tested it out yet, gonna do it after tomorrow since I need my phone at work tomorrow.
Is there a noticeable speed-difference when using the 1ghz-version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nferro said:
Nice work mate!
I'm using the 765Mhz version without any problem. Can anyone tell if the 1GHz causes the phone to overheat?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no overheat on the phone but didn't gave it intensive use yet..
On benchmarks it has significant improvement, but the phone normally has no lag, so, there is almost nothing to be noted ..

finally... in front of a computer... gonna try now!!! u da man disc0!
EDIT: everything working great so far loving the multitouch in dolphin!
testing 1ghz settings

It would be really great if we could have SetCPU working with 1ghz enabled to preserve battery life.
EDIT : I've emailed SETCPU's developer to ask him to set something like he did for the Droid (some kind of autodetection).

ahsid said:
It would be really great if we could have SetCPU working with 1ghz enabled to preserve battery life.
EDIT : I've emailed SETCPU's developer to ask him to set something like he did for the Droid (some kind of autodetection).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can add the information to setcpu.txt with the cpu speeds in the sdcard , but would be great to have support directly from the menu ..

@disco hit me u on gtalk "[email protected]"

What about the battery ?
Does this hack drains it more or not ?

nferro said:
Nice work mate!
I'm using the 765Mhz version without any problem. Can anyone tell if the 1GHz causes the phone to overheat?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It wont overheat the qsd8X50 was meant to run at 1ghz.

i'm running it at 1ghz no overheating problems at all for now neighter does the battery run out of juice faster, incredibly the opposite is the case it seems to last a bit longer, maybe cause of the optimized kernel

disc0 said:
You can add the information to setcpu.txt with the cpu speeds in the sdcard , but would be great to have support directly from the menu ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would you please tell me the numbers of the setcpu.txt?

I had no luck, after flashing 1Ghz no boot avbl, just blank screen. flashed back 765Mhz didn't help. Had to commence back from scratch with A1tools and a .bin

boglll said:
I had no luck, after flashing 1Ghz no boot avbl, just blank screen. flashed back 765Mhz didn't help. Had to commence back from scratch with A1tools and a .bin
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if u're using eclair it wont work.. this kernel is for donut only

well, now I know...

The 765 MHz version works great with my liquid - but i got bootloops with 1 GHz version, what could i do?

eX1337 said:
The 765 MHz version works great with my liquid - but i got bootloops with 1 GHz version, what could i do?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there's a 920 Mhz variant somewhere in modaco, 1ghz works on some (random) liquids only, mine works

[[ Cold ]] said:
there's a 920 Mhz variant somewhere in modaco, 1ghz works on some (random) liquids only, mine works
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With 920 MHz it boots into Android - but it reboots directly.
Am i so unlocky?
- need some 850 MHz Kernel to try

eX1337 said:
With 920 MHz it boots into Android - but it reboots directly.
Am i so unlocky?
- need some 850 MHz Kernel to try
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't worry! You are not alone

[UPDATE][BUILD][11.4.2010][Erick's Evo build for hd2 v0.2][Kernel: 2.6.32.15 #5]

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Ok so my hd2 got stolen and i need to buy a new one to make more builds.....so i im going to start updating this build once i get my new hd2(this might take along time becouse i need to earn the money)sorry ...... SO FAR ITS REALLY STABLE AND FAST!!! SO PLEASE DOWNLOAD AND TRY IT THANKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Installation Instructions:
1. Unzip the contents to your SD card. All of the files should extract into a folder named "Android".
2. Browse to the Android folder on your SD card and run CLRCAD.exe, then Haret.exe.
3. Let Android boot. The first boot will take longer.
4. YOUR READY!!!!!!!!! ENJOY HTC EVO ;D
Known issues:
Some apps dont work most of them do
There are menu items for 4G. The hardware doesn't support 4G!!!!!!
Battery tips
Use SetCPU for better battery life.
Turn off live wallpaper for better performance and battery life.
(This build does not drain your battery life)
ChangeLog:
v0.2
3g works now!!! REALLY FAST
changed the starting image
Wifi thetering works
Freezing problems fixed
Got faster!!!
v0.1.5
No more premature camera
Better screen quality!!!!
v0.1
first build
Tested on HTC HD2
The latest kernels and modules can always be found here: http://oe.netripper.com/files/htcleo...uild_evo_tree/
Also check out my blog (its about the hd2) http://leo-htc.blogspot.com/
Oh and check out my facebook page "LIKE" it please!!!!http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/pages/Ericks-HTC-HD2/155309767838377
Download here:
If you like my work and want to buy me a coke click on the can

To improve your thread, look at some of the other builds and see what they have. There is also a sticky that tells you what you should have in your post.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=734563
------------------------------------------
If you are making a Rom with Android built in or an Android Build that is run from haret then please INCLUDE with your file a readme.txt file in the ROOT of your release archive with the following information:
*What BUILD version?
An internal version # that can be used to identify the authors exact release (e.g. my-rom-v0.5.zip) for easier reference for the users and fellow developers benefiting from the release.
*Which kernel image and kernel modules are used?
Where are zImage and modules.ko originally downloaded (in case the chef didn't compile on their own) and where is the kernel source code for the kernel and modules.
In case the chef did not compile on his own, he should still be able find out where the source code is.
(The license under which the Linux kernel is released requires the distribution of the source code that was used when distributing builds.)
*What rootfilesystems are used?
Where was it taken from, what does it include (android version it's based on etc) and in case of self compilation, where is the source code.
(In case of most windows mobile shipped devices that's often some rootfs file e.g. named android.ext2 and an initial ram filesystem often named initrd.cpio.gz).
*ChangeLog*
A ChangeLog is really an essential addition in every build as it informs the end user what modifications have been made from the last build. This will save you ALOT of questions as to what has been added, deleted or modified and therefore is a requirement for everyones benefit.
*WindowsMobile version your Android Build was tested on*
Please include your WinMo Build version, HTC OemDrivers (if known), XIP (if known) and Radio version so that users know what the Android Build was tested on and can replicate if neccessary for fault finding purposes.
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
If you are unable to obtain any of this information and thus can't make it available through an included readme.txt you should not distribute your rom and keep it for personal use only.
If you are using an exact copy of a present release (e.g. in case of a WinCE rom that has an android 'dual boot' option) you must include the readme.txt from the original rom chef.
If you release a Rom and do not have the required information then you will be asked to either create and include a readme.txt file with your Rom or ask for the thread to be deleted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

i want try this, but you should be share some informations, some screenshots this build. And you must say what is this? Froyo, nexus or others?

It just Woo, nothing to say, cooool

In your testing, what works and what doesn't?

Well so far everything works fine exept wifi thetering and some apps from the market dont work either but im working on that

alright i'll give it a try! just make sure you update info about the build!

Make sure you update your post with the information mentioned in my post above, otherwise a moderator will delete this thread.

What about the battery life?

What kernel is it built with?

ok thanks!!! I WILL!!

If u use harstin 7.5 kernel the premature flash will go away
Sent from my hd2 aka tmobile evo eatin on some froyo

jriv said:
If u use harstin 7.5 kernel the premature flash will go away
Sent from my hd2 aka tmobile evo eatin on some froyo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not just that, it will fix laggy screen responsiveness and the light sensor is far better.

jriv said:
If u use harstin 7.5 kernel the premature flash will go away
Sent from my hd2 aka tmobile evo eatin on some froyo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Were can i find the harstin 7.5 kernel!!!!

erick1026 said:
Were can i find the harstin 7.5 kernel!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dude, i will assume you have been too busy building roms vs reading about them. here is a link, but it is in the same thread your build is in. good luck and try and avoid the noob questions if you are looking to make a name. hope all works out for ya.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=787588

erick,
Can you point me to any information that would help me start to make my own rom? I can't seem to find the info anywhere!

RobertsDF said:
erick,
Can you point me to any information that would help me start to make my own rom? I can't seem to find the info anywhere!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All you need is a kitchen to get started.

mattfmartin said:
All you need is a kitchen to get started.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know which kitchen I should use?

RobertsDF said:
Do you know which kitchen I should use?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only one that I know of is Coffee shop. I don't know if those things get outdated or not. Its been around for a while.

mattfmartin said:
The only one that I know of is Coffee shop. I don't know if those things get outdated or not. Its been around for a while.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cmyeah, coffee shop is the only one that I have found. Seems outdated but ill give it a try.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using Tapatalk

[Updated 19-3-12][ROM] Ace-Of-Spades V3 [Guaranteed Performance+Battery]

MODERATOR EDIT: This thread is closed, the downloads have been removed, and the author is banned.
------------------
Ace Of Spades
by Trent Turvey​
The speed of the rom is NOT due to overclocking or modifying the kernel
It's due to the optimization of the management, all that makes it faster is the fact that it can chew through applications better and faster
from the tweak of the management. Overclocking physically changes the speed of the processor.
Thankyou for my donations!!!!!!!!!!!
Note: I do special, private releases for donators.
Donation list:
Aldebaran de Touro
Aledro Sanchez
pradeepadiga
Thomas Kert
Description
Ace Of Spades is one of the highly preferred android systems.
Read the how-to or else you'll think the rom is playing up on first boot!
This System is designed for
1. Speed
2. Super Stability
3. Customization
4. General Use
5. Battery Performance
I've spent weeks, months purely modifying the system for performance whilst having the best battery life. I can guarantee the speed and the battery at the same time will impress.
This release has a blue over glow effect, Ice Cream Sandwich icons/animations and the Ice Cream Sandwich Status Bar. The backgrounds when in apps (Like gallery, contacts, settings etc.) are transparent.
I've added A2SD and I've included the A2SDGUI App in the ROM.
This rom is so highly customizable and stable, I've never used anyone else's rom for general use, I started developing roms so i could have a stable rom whilst being fast and efficient for social networking, gaming etc.
The System has an ultimate edit of the blackhawk kernel implemented into the rom. I have my own edits of the libs and files which all work together to make one stable, high quality system. I've based the System on 2.3.7, I've compiled the system directly from cyanogenmod github (It's pure cyanogenmod, No edit of anyone else's rom)
This is how I'll be doing it, I'll have three versions of each release
Yes, This version DOES have the CyanogenMod libaudio file ported by me, try the sound.. you'll notice it.
Overall, this rom is the best AOS release ever (well, from my experience)
ANY requests/issues regarding the rom, post below and I'll help you out, keep in mind that I'm only 16 years old and i have other commitments too! I'm customizing roms for YOU. So no hard criticism
How-to
You need ClockWorkMod installed (see here)
Reboot into ClockWorkMod Recovery, wipe data, wipe cache
Flash the .zip from the Downloads section (below) from clockwork recovery.
Reboot your phone (first boot will take some time, reboot twice for optimal performance)
Listen carefully! LET the rom do its thing when you install it, it'll reboot a couple of times (This is my script finalizing) It'll work like normal after the first boot.
Downloads
MODERATOR EDIT: Downloads have been removed
Screenshots
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

[Moderators]
If you find something you don't like or that violates XDA's terms of use, PM me and i'll change it straight away!
Thanks

First
Looks good dude
Looking forward to it
Reserved for my future Rom

evil_penguin said:
First
Looks good dude
Looking forward to it
Reserved for my future Rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cheers mate, Constructive Criticism is helpful too..

Pretty nice for a new dev. Welcome to the forums btw! I hope this rom becomes as good as the respected dev's roms

HAHA Good! Fresh dev!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium

trentlio said:
Cheers mate, Constructive Criticism is helpful too..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i never criticized
i told its my future rom because i have already flashed 5-6 roms from morning
so i will try this rom later....rom is very good
welcome to ace community
keep going

Whoever use it, screenahot please
regards,
•ƒγяύs ργяσ™• eBuddy XMS pin: A24D43B9
[menulis dari xda app yg cilabi pakop]

screenahots please !!!!

Nice rom, but I think I'll wait for your second release. Cheers!

is it based on some cm ( like FAT team's or vo-1's ) or this is entirely new ??

finally ...something different....NICE
will try the next version though...
coz your next version changes seems cool..

Its just another CM7 based rom. Fast and stable. No lags. All the best

Trent: what have you used as your base ROM, vo-1, FAT or something else?
If you do go about compiling CM yourself, a github fork with the code you use will be very welcome, currently both vo-1 and FAT do not do this (thus against the spirit of Cyanogen and Android itself)

Hey @trentlio...
Firstly, "Welcome to XDA "
I have just grabbed your rom for testing/use but what really interested me was your mention of a "Custom kernel" compiled by you...
I am not a dev but I do specialise in OC'ing both Pc/Android Cpu/Gpu... I have had some outstanding results so far using the various custom kernels/scripts available, @ketut, @FrozenAce Team, @TeamCooper, "Engengis_Delta" script engine etc...
I would be very interested in field testing your kernel once compiled & complete given that it also has OC capability...
If you would rather discuss this in private (not in public thread) then please PM me...
I think your kernel could have real potential especially if the frequencies are not limited (Blackhawk kernel etc.). We need the full range 1036mhz max... I believe that given the right kernel/rom/script combination, we can truly take the Ace to the 1ghz wall & possibly beyond. To date I have had OC @940mhz stable & I have exceeded 2500 points in Antutu bench @921mhz... The voltage limitation on ARMv6 is a real ***** but who knows what is around the corner eh...?
waiting to hear from you either way (yay or nay)...hehe...
Stay Breezy n Be Lucky...
Pe"ACE"...

I'll try it out after download. Going to give feedback after a few hours.
Feedback: Awesome boot-animation! Did you make it yourself? As for the rom. It's very fast and stable. It's like my Ace is already overclocked even without an OC kernel. Overall, it's a great rom. Keep it up.

preety nice bootanimation
fast stable and with antutu score 2079
nice!

Holly **** thats my rom name
i made it but didnt post cause of some bugs
i can give u link 2 see and screens of date uploaded
---------- Post added at 06:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:26 PM ----------
Also as i see in descreption this rom should be awesome
but im.not able to test it
and i dont know why it got so bad rating
but dont worry aboit that

Great Work dude, keep it up

humm it seems to be a nice rom How about batterydrain?
Good work !!

[Q] Building AOSP (ROM + Kernel) for Nexus 10?

I'm pretty interesting in trying to build from AOSP, but just had some questions:
1. What branch would I choose? I seem to have a choice between android-4.1.2_r1 or master
2. What's the difference between those 2 branches? If I think I understand right, the 4.1.2_r1 branch is locked at what it is now, and won't receive regular updates (future updates coming from higher revisions, such as r2 or etc.), and master is updated with whatever patches are submitted?
3. Should building the ROM and Kernel be separate processes?
4. I was reading around here, and didn't really notice any entries for Nexus 10/manta. On the part about building for devices, should I just use "full_manta-userdebug" ?
5. Are the drivers listed for manta at https://developers.google.com/android/nexus/drivers#manta the only drivers I need? I don't need any special driver for DRM like the Nexus 7 seems to need?
6. Would trying to build with linaro be a good idea? More specifically, would it be compatible, and would it yield any performance benefits? I thought I read that some linaro patches were brought over to AOSP a while back, but I also noticed some people still building with linaro and reporting speed increases.

building a kernel with Linaro does not yield any tangible performance benefits, despite what some want to believe. I dont know about real benefits on the ROM side, I seem to remember seeing Linaro can help there but I dont have the benchmarks on hand to show proof or not.
Kernel proof:
non linaro:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
linaro:
Neocore:
Stock: 55.4 fps
Linaro: 55.6 fps (within margin of error, need at LEAST 1 full fps difference in many subsequent tests to prove one is faster than the other)
Quadrant:
Stock:
Score: 1368 (higher is better)
Linaro:
Score: 1320 (again within margin of error, and Quadrant is terrible in consistency anyway)
Linpack:
Stock:
MFLOPS: 15.671
Time: 10.76
Norm Res: 3.24
Linaro:
MFLOPS: 14.235
Time: 11.85 s
Norm Res: 3.24
and another thread by a good kernel dev:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1371044&highlight=kernel+with+linaro

Cool, thanks for the info
I'll probably try downloading the source tonight; should take a good while though since my internet is pretty slow. I setup Ubuntu 10.04.4 x64 in a virtual machine and have it updating currently
Edit: Doing repo sync now. How much should I expect to be downloaded exactly, just so I have an idea on about how long to wait?

espionage724 said:
Cool, thanks for the info
I'll probably try downloading the source tonight; should take a good while though since my internet is pretty slow. I setup Ubuntu 10.04.4 x64 in a virtual machine and have it updating currently
Edit: Doing repo sync now. How much should I expect to be downloaded exactly, just so I have an idea on about how long to wait?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's in the low to mid gigabyte range. Too took me about an hour and a half with 50mbs fiber
Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk 2

98ramair said:
It's in the low to mid gigabyte range. Too took me about an hour and a half with 50mbs fiber
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, if it's like 7GB, I should have it overnight (max DL speed is 360kb/s... lol).

It downloaded overnight
I'm building it currently, not entirely sure how long that'll take though (4GB RAM + 4GB Swap + 3.3GHz X4 CPU on VMWare + -j4). I have CCache enabled too with 50GB.
Ran into 1 issue earlier where the repo sync ended because of gc error (can't recall exact error). Re-ran the sync with -j1 and it worked though (found that solution from search). I guess if I update my repo command, that'll fix it though.

And the build is done, took around a hour:
Some additional questions now:
- Should the Kernel date be that old?
- Do I have the latest Kernel belonging to the branch I chose?
- If I chose to build from master, would the Kernel be more up-to-date?

Not sure on the answer to those questions, but my guess would be the November 6th date is when the kernel repository was last updated rather than the build date
I think its great that you are getting into kernel developing. This device has a pretty poor dev community right now and we really need some more people.

Mind me asking, did you just run the flash command from the build, or did you extract the file and zip it for CWM?
I can't find the out file to flash manually either though :/

@espionage724 to answer your questions....
- Should the Kernel date be that old?
Yes, if you are building from AOSP it uses a prebuilt kernel (device/samsung/manta/kernel). You need to download the exynos kernel source separately (or use my source which has some changes over AOSP)...
- Do I have the latest Kernel belonging to the branch I chose?
Yes, unless you decide to build your own...
- If I chose to build from master, would the Kernel be more up-to-date?
Not always... and most often no...
---------- Post added at 10:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:05 PM ----------
Evostance said:
Mind me asking, did you just run the flash command from the build, or did you extract the file and zip it for CWM?
I can't find the out file to flash manually either though :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Run "make -j16 otapackage" to create an update zip...

I've built and flashed a 4.2 aosp ROM (tried both master and r1), but noticed that I'm missing email.apk...anyone else seeing the same thing??

Turbo4V said:
I've built and flashed a 4.2 aosp ROM (tried both master and r1), but noticed that I'm missing email.apk...anyone else seeing the same thing??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apparently a typo is AOSP... go to build/target/product/generic_no_telephony.mk and change Email2 to Email... you could manually build Email as well... mmm packages/apps/Email

craigacgomez said:
Apparently a type is AOSP... go to build/target/product/generic_no_telephony.mk and change Email2 to Email... you could manually build Email as well... mmm packages/apps/Email
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks Craig, I'll go and try building email manually!

espionage724 said:
I'm pretty interesting in trying to build from AOSP, but just had some questions:
1. What branch would I choose? I seem to have a choice between android-4.1.2_r1 or master
2. What's the difference between those 2 branches? If I think I understand right, the 4.1.2_r1 branch is locked at what it is now, and won't receive regular updates (future updates coming from higher revisions, such as r2 or etc.), and master is updated with whatever patches are submitted?
3. Should building the ROM and Kernel be separate processes?
4. I was reading around here, and didn't really notice any entries for Nexus 10/manta. On the part about building for devices, should I just use "full_manta-userdebug" ?
5. Are the drivers listed for manta at https://developers.google.com/android/nexus/drivers#manta the only drivers I need? I don't need any special driver for DRM like the Nexus 7 seems to need?
6. Would trying to build with linaro be a good idea? More specifically, would it be compatible, and would it yield any performance benefits? I thought I read that some linaro patches were brought over to AOSP a while back, but I also noticed some people still building with linaro and reporting speed increases.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you document your build process, with a compile script?
I want to fix some HDMI issues on my Nexus 10 and read the docs, but found myself stuck with what to do for manta?

Hello,
I am trying tot build Aosp for N10 but I cant select Manta when i do the lunch command. It simply doesnt show up. I can see grouper etc.
I did repo sync masterbranch.

[KERNEL] Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1[SM-T520] Cybertronic v5

Cybertronic Kernel v5 - 4/23/2014
Sync-up Kernel to 3.4.82 (from 3.4.39)
Samsung clean-up and debug removal (They leave tons of factory-only, test-only debug code on)
Config optimization
Cache read-ahead optimized
More free RAM (1760MB Stock, now 1830MB)
Compiled with latest 4.8 Android toolchain (better ARM optimizations for Cortex-A15)
Caveats:
Secure storage is disabled
Only signed Samsung kernels can have this enabled. Keys/Wifi passwords, etc. Are still stored in the secure Android key-chain,
they are just not stored in TrustZone hardware. If this is critical for you, stick with the stock Samsung kernels.
In Progress...:
- ARM HMP (This will allow all 8 cores to be online at once) Porting it in will be a challenge, since it was introduced in the
3.11 kernel branch. I'm hoping the next release from Samsung bumps up the version, so it will be easier. I'll work on it in
in the meantime though.
- Merge-in ADF from Android mainline.
- Merge in anything neat from S5
Install TWRP Recovery first:
http://goo.im/devs/OpenRecovery/picassowifi
Download and install in TWRP Recovery, or use Flashify:
MOD EDIT: Link Removed as per no kernel source as per XDA Rules, and no reply from Author of said kernel.

[RESERVED]

Works well so far. Features list will be nice
Dont want to look at purely benchmarks but seems fluid.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SM-T520 using Tapatalk

Nice! Is there a chance to get a kernel for T320 too?

Ill be more than happy to do testing on my SM-T520,

Cybertronicz said:
I've got a kernel I've been working on for the SM-T520.
Just looking for testers at the moment before releasing here publicly.
If interested in testing, PM me for link.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And what kind of kernel?
I think many of us would like more info before we risk bricking our device...
Since you give us NO information at all, We have NO clue what we are installing here,
how do we know what to expect, what the chances are,... ?

.:GraveD:. said:
And what kind of kernel?
I think many of us would like more info before we risk bricking our device...
Since you give us NO information at all, We have NO clue what we are installing here,
how do we know what to expect, what the chances are,... ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'll never brick your device from a kernel. It doesn't overwrite the bootloader or recovery. So you can always go back to stock, even if the kernel doesn't boot.
Anyhow.... I'm only looking for testers, who have experience. This isn't a public kernel yet, which is why the limited info. So please, calm down.
People have had good results testing so far, so I'll be releasing full details and the public file soon.
Thanks

Cybertronicz said:
You'll never brick your device from a kernel. It doesn't overwrite the bootloader or recovery. So you can always go back to stock, even if the kernel doesn't boot.
Anyhow.... I'm only looking for testers, who have experience. This isn't a public kernel yet, which is why the limited info. So please, calm down.
People have had good results testing so far, so I'll be releasing full details and the public file soon.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worries I'm not building up a rage or something like that
It was meant as a figure of speech since we now nothing
I just think it might attract more testers if we know more about what we are testing.
Is it optimized in general or is it meant for speed(oc'ing) or adds it extra functionalities to the kernel? something like that.
Anyway, I'm looking forward to your official release, and thank you for your time and effort you put into it for us Tab PRO users :good:

Does it mean we can also expect some roms for t520

i must say i have had quite the share of flashing, reflashing, and modifyting my however limited selection of android devices. Never bricked and item yet. I would love to test your kernel and give it my honest opinion.
Since its a testing thing, feel free to PM me deetails

Would love to try this, but how to get TWRP on SM-T520?
Found these recovery images for (I guess) our device, how to install these? Odin? http://goo.im/devs/OpenRecovery/picassowifi
Edit: I can confirm that flashing TWRP from rooted SM-T520 works with Flashify. Flashify finds and downloads correct TWRP2.7.0.1.

TheEvilVirus said:
Would love to try this, but how to get TWRP on SM-T520?
Found these recovery images for (I guess) our device, how to install these? Odin? http://goo.im/devs/OpenRecovery/picassowifi
Edit: I can confirm that flashing TWRP from rooted SM-T520 works with Flashify. Flashify finds and downloads correct TWRP2.7.0.1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for that, I'll add a note in the OP about where to grab TWRP.

This should be moved to the development section. May get lost here.
Sent from my SM-T520 using Tapatalk

Annihlist said:
This should be moved to the development section. May get lost here.
Sent from my SM-T520 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had it there originally...but a mod moved it here *shrug*

Cybertronicz said:
I had it there originally...but a mod moved it here *shrug*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But now you have a link with a kernel. Before you didn't hehe [emoji6]
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Really considering flashing this, just a question though, where can I find the stock kernel to be able to go back if I wanted to?
Sent from my SM-T520 using Tapatalk

Cybertronicz said:
Thanks for that, I'll add a note in the OP about where to grab TWRP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better mention Flashify, just the img doesn't show how to flash.
salemsayed said:
Really considering flashing this, just a question though, where can I find the stock kernel to be able to go back if I wanted
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need TWRP first, with which you can make a backup of System to preserve the current kernel.
Running with the kernel now. Seems to be in order, but cannot tell of any advantages that are noticable.

Just flashed it, can't really notice much difference, but will give it some time and report back
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

Since I've flashed the kernel (and then flashed stock again) and no thumbnails or pics are loading in most apps (namely Twitter, RedditSync) anyone faced that befot
Sent from my SM-T520 using Tapatalk

I've flashed the kernel. Now getting crash on launch camera (T520XXUAND1).