I have been searching the forums trying to understand why every oreo ROM has the same unfixable(yet) bug . Can someone explain what the issue really is? Maybe. This could turn into a thread for brainstorming to solve it!.
Dhaval Raichura said:
I have been searching the forums trying to understand why every oreo ROM has the same unfixable(yet) bug . Can someone explain what the issue really is? Maybe. This could turn into a thread for brainstorming to solve it!.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
our device hasn't had any official updates since MM so some of the components are makeshift or take from other phones. this is why things like this can occur
Dhaval Raichura said:
I have been searching the forums trying to understand why every oreo ROM has the same unfixable(yet) bug . Can someone explain what the issue really is? Maybe. This could turn into a thread for brainstorming to solve it!.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
netmgrd keeps crashing on Oreo
There is a fix but it's so ugly that as devs we debate everyday whether we should apply the fix or not
If you're curious the fix is to declare oneplus 2 as a low memory device with poor CPU capabilities and disable a lot of features. While this does fix the data bug it causes way more issues than it fixes. Also it's not disabling the features that fixes the issue, netmgrd just wants to run in that state
---------- Post added at 03:25 ---------- Previous post was at 03:23 ----------
SimplyJeevS said:
our device hasn't had any official updates since MM so some of the components are makeshift or take from other phones. this is why things like this can occur
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And he is also correct just so you know
---------- Post added at 03:37 ---------- Previous post was at 03:25 ----------
Also @Dhaval Raichura there's no brainstorming you can do here or "discussion" on how to resolve the issue. If that would have worked we would have had treble and Android P booting on our device. I don't see discussion nor brainstorming being able to achieve that
Tell you what, start learning programming, lock yourself up in a basement for 5 years writing and reviewing code 24/7 and then get some experience at reverse engineering. Can't do it? Neither can us devs. If you pull it off proceed to reverse engineer netmgrd and rebuild it with the fix in. By the time you'll be done everyone would have already sold their phones. Discussion gets us nowhere really
anupritaisno1 said:
netmgrd keeps crashing on Oreo
There is a fix but it's so ugly that as devs we debate everyday whether we should apply the fix or not
If you're curious the fix is to declare oneplus 2 as a low memory device with poor CPU capabilities and disable a lot of features. While this does fix the data bug it causes way more issues than it fixes. Also it's not disabling the features that fixes the issue, netmgrd just wants to run in that state
---------- Post added at 03:25 ---------- Previous post was at 03:23 ----------
And he is also correct just so you know
---------- Post added at 03:37 ---------- Previous post was at 03:25 ----------
Also @Dhaval Raichura there's no brainstorming you can do here or "discussion" on how to resolve the issue. If that would have worked we would have had treble and Android P booting on our device. I don't see discussion nor brainstorming being able to achieve that
Tell you what, start learning programming, lock yourself up in a basement for 5 years writing and reviewing code 24/7 and then get some experience at reverse engineering. Can't do it? Neither can us devs. If you pull it off proceed to reverse engineer netmgrd and rebuild it with the fix in. By the time you'll be done everyone would have already sold their phones. Discussion gets us nowhere really
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im not a dev :lul:
Related
So, now that Web OS Is gonna get in our hands as open source, is there any interest in developing it for our beloved hd2?
Really?
I am going to have to look into that (I am not a DEV just a curious) I had no Idea that they went open source!
Nice had a look into it, unfortunatly it may be a little while before they get it out. I bet with the brainpower here this could be on our phones in no time after it is released!
http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/73937.html
You seem to be in the wrong thread. Htc Hd2 is originally a windows mobile 6.5 device to which other OSes, particularly android, are being ported to.
This is the general thread for the hd2 android users. You question is equivalent to spam, has no relevance here and reduces the efficiency of others coming here to get solutions to their problems or proffer solutions to other people's problems.
---------- Post added at 10:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:52 PM ----------
Sorry. On a re-read I come across as being harsh. Did not mean to sound as such.
Chris Kerry said:
You seem to be in the wrong thread. Htc Hd2 is originally a windows mobile 6.5 device to which other OSes, particularly android, are being ported to.
This is the general thread for the hd2 android users. You question is equivalent to spam, has no relevance here and reduces the efficiency of others coming here to get solutions to their problems or proffer solutions to other people's problems.
---------- Post added at 10:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:52 PM ----------
Sorry. On a re-read I come across as being harsh. Did not mean to sound as such.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Out of curiosity what makes his comment inappropriate or considered spam? He is asking a valid question about whether WebOS will be ported to the HD2 just as Android and WP7 have......
+1
and web os technically runs on a branch of linux if im correct
android=linux
lol.
@chrisrj28: I admit it, I wanted to post in hd2 general, but being given that booting linux is the first step that brought us ubuntu, android, wp7, etc on hd2, yes it could be considered that it may be placed here as well.
@the rest: Thanks for backing me up
Is this the open source repository? http://opensource.palm.com/packages.html
press release: http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press/2011/111209xa.html
Hi I was thinking about encrypting the phone myself, but I've read so much about the storage's performance being impacted negatibely that I wanted to know your take on this, any hands on experience?
guillaumedsde said:
Hi I was thinking about encrypting the phone myself, but I've read so much about the storage's performance being impacted negatibely that I wanted to know your take on this, any hands on experience?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do you want to encrypt?
---------- Post added at 04:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:32 PM ----------
You could always encrypt and then un encrypt later if it affects performance, as long as you don't lose the encryption key.
Encryption provides with peace of mind if the phone is stolen, now I just wanted to hear people's take on encryption
You could always google like I did.
See this site (and many others):-
http://www.greenbot.com/article/285...evastates-storage-performance-tests-show.html
I've been searching for a while on how to root the Samsung Galaxy J3 V from Verizon. It's not the prepaid version. It's on a contract, but purchased outright. I've tried several methods to rooting this phone, but all have been unsuccessful. The phone is on Android version 6.0.1. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Don't know if you're still looking but I remember seeing some links on google today after doing a few minutes of research for my mother. She's getting one for free with a contract and I always looks and review the phones a bit before she gets one. I always try to find her one that I can at least root and install a recovery like CWM or TWRP. I remember several links when searching for verizon samsung j3v root and found a few. Below is an example I hope it helps. If it does please give me a thanks or whatever they're called I forget sometimes.
https://www.kingoapp.com/root-samsung.htm
---------- Post added at 08:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:05 PM ----------
One other thing I forgot to add is that I almost always add xda to my google searches because more often than not, someone has already figured out what you need to know. Or do a search here..
---------- Post added at 08:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:06 PM ----------
Last thing I promise. I didn't mean search in a bad way, some people know to search some don't that's just the way it is so please don't take it the wrong way. I have been on forums before where people get very angry and rude if you don't search first. That doesn't happen so much here but most prefer you to at least be able to show that you've attempted a search. This also helps prevent multiple threads with the same issue. Also add some tags or add solved to the title too if you the above works, or if you post how to do it on you own and post how and or where. Looks like you're new to XDA so let me welcome you to the one of, if not the absolute best community I've found so far concerning android. I came over from Rootzwiki after following the developers for my devices here, as did many others, but I still refer back there occasionally for older stuff. Good luck and again Welcome to XDA!
Friend, does the method really work?
Good luck to you all. I've decided I'm done with Jide and will move to a company that provides support. Looking at the new JIde IO and IO+ elicits a comparison to Roku. I have 2 Roku devices, including a Roku HD that is 5+ years old. Got its last update in December of 2016, last time I checked. Compare that to the Ultra Tablet which is not currently being supported.
Mine is on ebay if anyone wants to take a look.
Good luck, but I doubt Jide will give a hoot about you as they have shown thus far,
Agree. Not even replies to the forums anymore either!
I completely agree. When I got my hands on the ultratablet I was really happy, the hardware is great and the software was promising. The lack of updates and support have really dissapointed me, nowadays I use my ultratablet maybe one or twice per month! Rather dissapointing for a company that we fully supported through Kickstarter.
I've heard there's a custom OS for the ultratablet in the works. I can't remember the name of it.
---------- Post added at 08:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:21 AM ----------
I'll post the link to its thread when I can find it again
JSMastah said:
I've heard there's a custom OS for the ultratablet in the works. I can't remember the name of it.
---------- Post added at 08:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:21 AM ----------
I'll post the link to its thread when I can find it again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
VERY curious as to what the hell you are talking about, hahaha. Any info would be great.
Any luck finding that link?
They don't want to open source their OS, they must be hiding something because when I asked if they had plans to open source it AND WHY they only answered that they don't have any plans to open source the OS but didn't say why.
They've released source code for what they are obligated to under applicable licences.
https://www.xda-developers.com/jide-remix-is-now-gpl-and-apache-compliant/
Edit: although rereading the XDA article, it can be misconstrued either way.
lusephur said:
They've released source code for what they are obligated to under applicable licences.
https://www.xda-developers.com/jide-remix-is-now-gpl-and-apache-compliant/
Edit: although rereading the XDA article, it can be misconstrued either way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So disappointed this thing never got CM/Lineage or any other custom ROM.
I have finally built it after trying different things, I fixed the problem myself. After receiving a whole lot of flak on my thread (that I intended to have this build already uploaded to) I have decided to ask if anyone wants me to create a thread for my sub-weekly builds. I will be building them as quickly as I feel they should be made (if errors happen) or weekly. Hope you guys are a little kinder this time to me. Or I might just stop replying to those comments. Anyways, let me know soon. Otherwise I'll take it as a no and just build it for myself.:good:
I am looking forward to it
Pls Share the Build.
Techie Android said:
I have finally built it after trying different things, I fixed the problem myself. After receiving a whole lot of flak on my thread (that I intended to have this build already uploaded to) I have decided to ask if anyone wants me to create a thread for my sub-weekly builds. I will be building them as quickly as I feel they should be made (if errors happen) or weekly. Hope you guys are a little kinder this time to me. Or I might just stop replying to those comments. Anyways, let me know soon. Otherwise I'll take it as a no and just build it for myself.:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This community is for sharing.You're more than welcome to share stuff that you feel worthy.
Though what you did the other day was incorrect,you'll get to know that yourself if you have a look at XDA rules.Just follow the rules and remember what is appropriate and what is not appropriate.
BTW,did you fixed the proximity sensor and random app crashes issue?
Please share. I've no idea what mistake you made and I really don't care too.
Mr.Ak said:
This community is for sharing.You're more than welcome to share stuff that you feel worthy.
Though what you did the other day was incorrect,you'll get to know that yourself if you have a look at XDA rules.Just follow the rules and remember what is appropriate and what is not appropriate.
BTW,did you fixed the proximity sensor and random app crashes issue?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand that about the rules and respect that and I admit I did not look at the rules regarding that, and I apologize for that. But it only took about a day to fixed the compiling problems, so all that whining to the mods to remove my thread was just plain unnecessary IMO. I will be more careful though now that I know that there are sensitive people here.
I'm not having any of that. Can you elaborate and maybe I can look into that more, what instance was it happening in? Remember I'm not associated with AOSPA on GitHub so I cannot make changes to the master. I'm still new to compiling ROMs and could probably use some insight on how and what is safe to modify on my local copy of the source. I was thinking about replacing jack compiler with the default toolchain now that jack has been depreciated.
Let me test this build out just to see what works/doesn't real quick and then I'll make another thread. I supposed it doesn't need to be flawless since I've seen worse ROMs pop up and they plain didn't half work. And sometimes they say to test it out yourself and report bugs... So I guess I'll upload it soon in a thread in the ROMs section.
Eagerly waiting for your build...
Techie Android said:
Let me test this build out just to see what works/doesn't real quick and then I'll make another thread. I supposed it doesn't need to be flawless since I've seen worse ROMs pop up and they plain didn't half work. And sometimes they say to test it out yourself and report bugs... So I guess I'll upload it soon in a thread in the ROMs section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes,but devs only do that when they do blind builds aka builds for devices they don't have,since they can't test it themselves they release it to people having that device to test it out.
---------- Post added at 04:38 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:31 PM ----------
Techie Android said:
I understand that about the rules and respect that and I admit I did not look at the rules regarding that, and I apologize for that. But it only took about a day to fixed the compiling problems, so all that whining to the mods to remove my thread was just plain unnecessary IMO. I will be more careful though now that I know that there are sensitive people here.
I'm not having any of that. Can you elaborate and maybe I can look into that more, what instance was it happening in? Remember I'm not associated with AOSPA on GitHub so I cannot make changes to the master. I'm still new to compiling ROMs and could probably use some insight on how and what is safe to modify on my local copy of the source. I was thinking about replacing jack compiler with the default toolchain now that jack has been depreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some apps and games which were supposed to work(since they work out fine on other ROMs) give force closes.
About proximity sensor, when you place your device during a call on your ear then the screen should turn off normally,but it doesn't(on official AOSPA) due to proximity sensor issues, although it can be fixed by using another firmware ,it should be fixed(ROM side changes) so that people can use other firmwares too if they want to.
It's up! https://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-one/development/rom-t3656901
Mr.Ak said:
Yes,but devs only do that when they do blind builds aka builds for devices they don't have,since they can't test it themselves they release it to people having that device to test it out.
---------- Post added at 04:38 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:31 PM ----------
Some apps and games which were supposed to work(since they work out fine on other ROMs) give force closes.
About proximity sensor, when you place your device during a call on your ear then the screen should turn off normally,but it doesn't(on official AOSPA) due to proximity sensor issues, although it can be fixed by using another firmware ,it should be fixed(ROM side changes) so that people can use other firmwares too if they want to.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I had the proximity problem but never had my apps crash. But the proximity problem is fixed now.
can you build paranoid android with OOS blobs V3?
It uses 2.x right now, right?
also more video codec support?
Thread closed. Anything after this point I will not monitor. Go to https://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-one/development/rom-t3656901 to post.
so far aospa(just test it) in my OnePlus One has the following issues (official AOSPA from their website)
- The hardware keys light is broken(lights up whenever and for unknown time - also cannot be controller),
- The battery circle icon(my favorite) ...if you use the percentage, you can't see the percentage ...circle is having a thick layer(for some reason)
Didn't test it further as I can't have these obvious bugs, so back to LA-OS until it's better