Database Users

iPhone 5 catches up to flagship droids in first Geekbench scores

Look like my S3 is going to be down..someone explain and what you think about this ?
It has its crown
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
There was plenty of speculation what kind of CPU powered the new iPhone 5 and in the end it turned out to be a custom Apple design. So, how well did the Cupertino-based company did? According to an unverified Geekbench results, A6more than meets the 2x performance increase Apple promised.
The results are nothing short of amazing - the Apple A6 chipset has two custom cores rated at 1GHz with 1GB of RAM and it easily stands up to quad-core Cortex-A9 and dual-core Krait designs running at 1.5GHz.
The iPhone 5 has more than double the CPU performance of the 4S, beating it in every category that Geekbench tests. The RAM has gotten faster too. Even the A5X in the new iPad can't compete (understandable as A5X only improves GPU performance over the A5).
As for high-end Androids, Exynos 4 Quad and Tegra 3 based phones like the Samsung Galaxy S III and the HTC One X manage to outperform the iPhone 5 if they are running Android Jelly Bean. Under Ice Cream Sandwich, the performance of the One X drops down to the levels of the iPhone.
The HTC One S and its two Krait cores manage to match the iPhone 5 under Ice Cream Sandwich, so it should come out slightly ahead.
Just for fun, here's a dual-core Pentium 4 541 (Prescott architecture) downclocked to 2.4GHz matching the performance of the iPhone 5. This CPU came out in Q3 of 2004.
If these benchmark results do turn out to be from the iPhone 5 (results can be faked, so take it with a grain of salt) then Apple must have worked some serious magic. The Apple A6 chipset makes even Krait cores look slow (again, it's 1GHz vs. 1.5GHz).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1030202

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/search?q=samsung+galaxy+s+III
See... How many S III scored lower than 1601...
All with JB leaks beats iPhone 5 score...
i think the benchmarking tool is a bit of weird. The One S also scored 1.5k... Not X but S.... S4 processor. Maybe it does not really use all the 4 cores?

the benchmark tool is useless... its more OS based then anything... change your launcher that u use and u'll get a different score every time...

I think you need to learn how to read geek bench the majority of iPhone 5 score is in fast memory the processor is still pretty slow by itself. Also mod please close this thread all iPhone threads crash and burn.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app

why people open everyday same **** again again(@OP : Is apple marketing team has ordered open new thread everyday?). the iphone 5 have nothing new. just to say thinnest and tallest (but these kind of models already available years ago. ). If you want compare iphone 5 to galaxy line you have to compare it with galaxy s, sII or galaxy sIII mini. It's not worth it to compare to with sIII.
(By the way iphone5 cpu and memory provided by Samsung.)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1891076

©®™

I got a 1741 on mine with stock 1.4ghz and jellybean. No sweat!!
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium

I think they used the US S3 which is dual cored, instead of the international S3. That's why the scores are lower.

1.Why post this on here?
2.A newer phone that is somehow faster....really? is that how technology works, well if it is then I guess the SGS4 to be even faster, and the SGS5, and I will go as far to say that the SGS24 will be greater still.

i think a lot of you who post Samsung s3 vs. whatever is insecure and are those who always want to have the best or be the best. People are competitive by nature but being obsessive, wasting your time and energy on products that serve the same purpose is a bit overkill. My advise is to find a cure for the disease you have. Just enjoy your phone.

swift2fly said:
i think a lot of you who post Samsung s3 vs. whatever is insecure and are those who always want to have the best or be the best. People are competitive by nature but being obsessive, wasting your time and energy on products that serve the same purpose is a bit overkill. My advise is to find a cure for the disease you have. Just enjoy your phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very well said! the other word " BIASED"

hero000 said:
Very well said! the other word " BIASED"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get over 2000 with the jelly bean and the processor overclocked to 1.6

thread closed

Antutu Benchmark?

Anyone else? I got 67,240 in 64bit mode on first and over 68k in 2nd. Finally figured out the screen shot.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

aaronc_98 said:
Anyone else? I got 62,740 in 64bit mode.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WOW....Screenshot?

Hrm... that's actually a little on the low side compared to some of the numbers it was putting up on review units. Most of those I saw were hovering around 70,000.
Definitely curious to see what other folks pull.

aaronc_98 said:
Anyone else? I got 62,740 in 64bit mode.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not brave enough to install that unsigned apk. I did score almost 58k in the standard antututu. Too be honest both these numbers are a lot lower then what I was thinking. Most of the results were on par with the exynos 5420 other then the mali gpu which scored nearly 20k (double the 5420 mali). Even the storage io numbers weren't radically different Despite their claims of high performance internal storage.
Anyways benchmarks usually only tell a small part of the story and there could be other things at play here that I have yet to discover. I'm hoping we see kernel source for this device soon.

I think this kind of benchmark is more useful and interesting as it correlates with something in real-life, like actual use of the device:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHb6IlmmV2o

Here's mine for those that care.

Do you have any battery temperature readings when running the Antutu?

Hehe, I see there was a typo in your original measurement
Good stuff. Looks like the retail units are definitely up to snuff. Keep em coming guys.

Poetique said:
Hehe, I see there was a typo in your original measurement
Good stuff. Looks like the retail units are definitely up to snuff. Keep em coming guys.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I went back and edited it cuz I saw I'm a bit dyslexic apparently...

this was the very first run in 64 bit mode, non 64 bit was 64508,

67282 with 64bit, sorry that is such a large screenshot

Here is my score, with all my apps installed 37+!

iGordy101 said:
Here is my score, with all my apps installed 37+!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It really is a beast! My friend has this phone, but I have the HTC M9 and it only gets 60927 on AnTuTu. In fairness though, the CPU only goes up to 1.5 GHz on little core + 2.0 GHz on the big core while Exynos has it 1.6+2.2 and 20 nm process

theveterans said:
It really is a beast! My friend has this phone, but I have the HTC M9 and it only gets 60927 on AnTuTu. In fairness though, the CPU only goes up to 1.5 GHz on little core + 2.0 GHz on the big core while Exynos has it 1.6+2.2 and 20 nm process
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah man, this is really a beast and so beautiful!

theveterans said:
It really is a beast! My friend has this phone, but I have the HTC M9 and it only gets 60927 on AnTuTu. In fairness though, the CPU only goes up to 1.5 GHz on little core + 2.0 GHz on the big core while Exynos has it 1.6+2.2 and 20 nm process
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the qualcomm 810 is 20nm process, exynos is 14nm

Everything stock, out of the box

lowest i scored is 67.5k, highest is around 69.5

---------- Post added at 10:45 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:43 AM ----------
And on a better day

Andi1000 said:
Everthing stock, out of the box
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I think I got the highest score than any phone I ever owned on stock out of the box near 80000 hahah I was so scared lol

Out of box, playstore app full update, latest ITV (Vodafone) update

[Official]Z5 Compact Benchmark Thread

Post your benchmarks here, and no "benchmarks are meaningless", we know that already (though some more and some less).
As far as i can tell 3D performance is on point, absolutely zero lag in console-like games like "oddworld" with full graphics, which is great and promising.
Here are some Antutu samples:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

It should be great with the lower resolution, everything else would be crazy ?
Skickat från min LG-H815 via Tapatalk

Just did my Z5C
Not bad from a compact with only 2gb ram!

@gadjet can you tell me which firmware (region and customization) do you use)? This is maximum from me right now :crying: And can you place ss from cpuz please; I want to see how fast run s810 at youre device; 1,56 Ghz an mine, and gsmarena write 2ghz?!
edit: strange things happens; now I enter again in cpuz and see tottaly different picture...and shure the better score! (3rd and 4th picture uploaded now)! Any ideas?!

His Proday please find attached, got a 2nd Z5C due to camera blur issue and newv antutu score

Cutting down on processes and uninstalling stuff definitely helps the score.

Just got my Z5C (Central European distribution - namely Czech Republic). Messed around a bit but was not overwhelmed by extraordinary performance. Slight lags here and there, not very impressed.
Ran the Antutu, it gave me quite a poor 53500 score, so I have no idea how you guys squeeze such a high scores from it. Seem like heavily throttled. Do I have an early revision?
Device part number - 1299-1434 Rev1
Customization - 1298-7258
UPDATE: Strange thing, inserted sim card, rebooted, ran again and got 62400, another run 59700.

@OtaruM i think that you have same problem as I. I have flashed firmware for central europe (with flashtool) on mu device and sometimes processor woark on 1.55ghz instead 1.96. Look at my photos higher, install cpu-z and check what happens.
@gadjet really impressive score. Which firmware region do you use?

It's a wolf in sheep's clothing.
Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk

Omg 66.5k!?...gr8 score man!

Hi,
Today it is the second day I am using my z5 Compact. I noticed some lags, so I ran some Benchmarks. Also I noticed, that my Device is running max 1.5Ghz like someone mentioned before.
Devcheck, CPU-z and CPU Times are reporting a 1.5 GHz CPU.
Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk

Antutu 5.7.1
z5 compact E5823
64bit mode benchmark: 65203 points
ROM version: 32.0.A.4.11
Devcheck also reporting max 1.55 Ghz, governor interactive, I/O cfq.
Not sure if devcheck might only show the frequency of the 4 A53 cores and not the 2ghz of the 4 A57 cores. Or Sony has done some underclocking to address the battery life and overheating issues of the 810. In any case, the benchmark result is pretty good and battery life as well as heat is satisfying (using it now for one week).

The A57 run at 2.0GHz. A53 run at 1.55GHz.
Source: http://www.anandtech.com/show/8933/snapdragon-810-performance-preview

Did anyone try the new v6 Antutu Benchmark?
In normal use and room temperature I only get around 65000 result, which according to the comparison table is far below the listed Z5. Only if I put the phone in my freezer and Bench it in there I can just match the 74k, that the normal Z5 is listed at.
Not too impressed to be honest.

I work in retail and a customer came into the store this morning with a Z3 on 5.1.1 Lollipop. It actually felt snappier than my Z5 Compact. Don't know how that's possible. Sony need to sort out the software optimisation because having an older phone that feels snappier than the new phone is illogical. I'm guessing Sony's software is not properly optimised for the big.LITTLE architecture of the Snapdragon 810. Marshmallow hopefully will fix this!
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

69795 on antutu V6

supercakefish said:
I work in retail and a customer came into the store this morning with a Z3 on 5.1.1 Lollipop. It actually felt snappier than my Z5 Compact. Don't know how that's possible. Sony need to sort out the software optimisation because having an older phone that feels snappier than the new phone is illogical. I'm guessing Sony's software is not properly optimised for the big.LITTLE architecture of the Snapdragon 810. Marshmallow hopefully will fix this!
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have both phones (Z5C and Z3C) and I see little difference in the overall feel regarding speed when using them. A little disappointing considering the money I spent but I'm not sure how much faster these devices can get.
Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk

Mine is 77430

80441

81476 heuhueheu

Share your antutu scores please.

Hello haven't got this phone yet but very interested to see your antutu scores please.

Getting approx 53000, encrypted as well as decrypted/rooted.
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Hayth said:
Getting approx 53000, encrypted as well as decrypted/rooted.
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cheers was hoping that we would have higher scores. I know that these don't mean much to some but am kinda fixated on them lol. Thanks for sharing.

[emoji14] When we get custom kernels/roms those figures will be higher I'm sure. The phone absolutely flies tbh, especially with animations set to .5
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I'm happy enough, that's about where I'd expect to be.
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Wow! I'm only at 42734!

Yet the phone still stutters and lags more than a nexus 5. Benchmarks are pointless.

Nothing special, but I'm happy with it.

Stock without mods. I get 45000+ on my Galaxy S5 running CyanogenMod 12.1 but side by side, the 5X works much smoother and quicker with less app refreshing.
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

hmm, thanks for sharing guys. My Wifes galaxy s6 clocks over 60K. These are pretty much same price if looking at the right places. Still very torn but I suspect the 2gb of ram is the main culprit.

My S6E clocked in at 67,000, but it still lagged and stuttered more than my 5X. Also the constant home screen redraws and aggressive RAM management... It all just means that benchmarks don't always show the actual day to day user experience.

You should compare both Antutu results from the S6 and 5X. I'm sure it's probably everything in combination as the S6 has a better processor, RAM amount and type, and graphics processor.
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Does this help?
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

42745
Stock with encryption and without root
Envoyé de mon Nexus 5X en utilisant Tapatalk

They can't be compared, they are completely different devices from chips set to core / ram count. But maybe the biggest difference is that Samsung devices are "wired" to benchmark @ ridiculous levels. Its basically volkswagen emissions testing; hell I bet they share firmware engineers lol!
The 6p won't be able to push much further than a oneplus two or HTC m9. Next year will be more of an equalizer on chipsets if everyone goes with the snapdragon 820.
Nexus is an experience, IMO, and is all about device control and pushing android to its best levels possible.

Oddly enough, benchmarks vary a lot on my 5x, I suppose it has a lot to do with throttling and what not. I've ran Antutu 3 times and gotten scores of 37,000, 42,000, and 49,000.
Sent from my Nexus 5X using XDA Free mobile app

49092 for me....

How did you guys manage to get higher than 43k?
I tried several times in different occasion and all end up around 43k...
Is there a way to optimize it or you just live in a cooler place?

Cooler place. I'm in Canada. I did mine outdoors
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Antutu score

Hi guys, why my antutu score is so low compared to OP3 (especially on 3D) ? It's even lower than the old G5. I'm using v10t open stock rom
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my LG-H870 using Tapatalk

Strange, my G6 scored 144325 points with the same benchmarking app.
Your test seems to lack in 3D performances.
I did not stop any app before I run the bench.

1. don't give a **** about benchmarks
2. use the onboard Smart Doctor before Benchmark
3. Stop all your social waste apps like Facebook or better deinstall it, takes a lot of performance
4. LG G6 Display got a much higher resolution, this needs more performance
5. Oneplus is cheating on Benchmarks
So, don't give a f u c k about those things

Update : i did another test with "force gpu rendering" option on and with game battery saver off. My score increased but i saw on youtube that other variant of G6 can reach up to 160k
Sent from my LG-H870 using Tapatalk

ric84 said:
1. don't give a **** about benchmarks
2. use the onboard Smart Doctor before Benchmark
3. Stop all your social waste apps like Facebook or better deinstall it, takes a lot of performance
4. LG G6 Display got a much higher resolution, this needs more performance
5. Oneplus is cheating on Benchmarks
So, don't give a f u c k about those things
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Point 4 doesn't matter here because AnTuTu does the 3D benchmark at 1080p

simo14 said:
Update : i did another test with "force gpu rendering" option on and with game battery saver off. My score increased but i saw on youtube that other variant of G6 can reach up to 160k
Sent from my LG-H870 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Without modified system and few apps running in background.

MuttleyMB said:
Without modified system and few apps running in background.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My problem is 3D performance... Which firmware are you using ?
Sent from my LG-H870 using Tapatalk

simo14 said:
My problem is 3D performance... Which firmware are you using ?
Sent from my LG-H870 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just a stock v10t-EUR-XX Vodafone IT Branded firmware (no root) with many bloatware disabled.

ric84 said:
1. don't give a **** about benchmarks
2. use the onboard Smart Doctor before Benchmark
3. Stop all your social waste apps like Facebook or better deinstall it, takes a lot of performance
4. LG G6 Display got a much higher resolution, this needs more performance
5. Oneplus is cheating on Benchmarks
So, don't give a f u c k about those things
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excpecially the point 5 should avoid any benchmark comparison with OnePlus smartphones

also, changing to the latest available antutu (outside of google play store) changed my score too, 140k+ is on par with snapdragon 821 devices and you shouldn't fret about the small differences. Try Geekbench

EvilHowl said:
Point 4 doesn't matter here because AnTuTu does the 3D benchmark at 1080p
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, didnt know! I mean i didnt recognize it :laugh:

Software Version ...V10t
Gesendet von meinem LG-H870 mit Tapatalk

Close up whatsapp & have the battery above 90% when benchmarking and start with a room temperature phone.