Related
Hi all,
I can't find any benchmark about Nexus 10 on GeekBench. I need to compare it with Apple Ipad 4 CPU (already listed on geekbench website).
Someone could help me?
Where can I find a benchmark?
crashlab said:
Hi all,
I can't find any benchmark about Nexus 10 on GeekBench. I need to compare it with Apple Ipad 4 CPU (already listed on geekbench website).
Someone could help me?
Where can I find a benchmark?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will smash the iPad 4. But no-one has had a chance to bench it yet.
Dual Exynos 5250 ARM-Cortex A15 CPU vs @1.7GHz
Dual Apple A6 ARM-Cortex A9 (with some architectural enhancements from A15) @ 1.3GHz
Mali-604 GPU which is 4-5x faster than previous generations Mali-400 GPU
PowerVR SGX543MP4 GPU which is great compared to Tegra and OMAP, but not compared to Mali-604
RAM is double on Nexus 10.
Geekbench on N10 is 2315 as per ZDNET. On N4, it's 1961.
I think they should improve further as Google clearly haven't optimized the drivers properly. A lot of work needs to be done from google to to optimize the devices. Expect to improve further in future.
Just got 2657 on geek bench on my nexus 10. It's rooted with a custom rom but not overclocked
I got only 1590 with geekbench on my CM11+KTmanta Nexus 10..
so how can you get 2700..?
rhyxos said:
I got only 1590 with geekbench on my CM11+KTmanta Nexus 10..
so how can you get 2700..?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi
Geekbench 3 scores shouldn't be compared with Geekbench 2 scores. AFAIK your score is related to GB3 while theirs (that are older) are related to GB2 .
~Lord
XxLordxX said:
Hi
Geekbench 3 scores shouldn't be compared with Geekbench 2 scores. AFAIK your score is related to GB3 while theirs (that are older) are related to GB2 .
~Lord
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought my device had some power issues with that score (1500)
8 cortex a7 are the same power comsuption than 4 cortex a8, the same or less that 4 a9, and less that 4 a15, and have more ghz in total, so it would be a good idea to make this, mtk make cortex a 7 processors and the 4 cores device with it are the same speed as google nexus 4, so i think that it will be a good idea
persano said:
8 cortex a7 are the same power comsuption than 4 cortex a8, the same or less that 4 a9, and less that 4 a15, and have more ghz in total, so it would be a good idea to make this, mtk make cortex a 7 processors and the 4 cores device with it are the same speed as google nexus 4, so i think that it will be a good idea
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just think of AMD vs INTEL
More cores vs. higher performance per core
Don't get fooled by the market gimmick and I prefer the A9/Intel way any day.
arda99 said:
Just think of AMD vs INTEL
More cores vs. higher performance per core
Don't get fooled by the market gimmick and I prefer the A9/Intel way any day.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry, but mediatek stoled my idea, they are doing an exellent job with not more cores, it is same performance with more cores with more battery saving and making a good architecture no like amd, amd isnt bad, they chipsets are wrong built, bulldozer stink
Here are the various benchmark results from the OnePlus X device.
AnTuTu Benchmark score:38132
AnTuTu HTML5 test: 18219
Geekbench 3 score: Single-Core: 918
Multi-core: 2433
3DMark Score: SlingShot using ES 3.0 : 701
I've attached the screenshots of all the test result for reference.
38132 Antutu makes no sense. My OnePlus One with the same CPU/GPU gets almost 50K
XblackdemonX said:
38132 Antutu makes no sense. My OnePlus One with the same CPU/GPU gets almost 50K
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reaches upto 40K+ for mine in an tu tu.
And OPO has 2.5Ghz CPU but OP X has 2.3Ghz that differs the score.
I had 50k with my oneplus one and 39k with my oneplus x.
But, the htc one m8 had 2.3ghz s801 with 2gb of ram and had 45k antutu...
PoloB49 said:
I had 50k with my oneplus one and 39k with my oneplus x.
But, the htc one m8 had 2.3ghz s801 with 2gb of ram and had 45k antutu...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I know op x uses the least powerful 801 and m8 used the more powerful sd801 2.3ghz cpu.
Legolas.X said:
As far as I know op x uses the least powerful 801 and m8 used the more powerful sd801 2.3ghz cpu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, the X has the AA variant which has a lower clocked CPU and GPU hence the differences between other SD801 chips.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7846/...-snapdragon-800-and-801-clearing-up-confusion
kinghu said:
Yup, the X has the AA variant which has a lower clocked CPU and GPU hence the differences between other SD801 chips.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7846/...-snapdragon-800-and-801-clearing-up-confusion
View attachment 3538054
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, enough for UI animations and Fruit Ninja. I think that's a reasonable expectation for a $250 device with an awesome build.
CafeKampuchia said:
So, enough for UI animations and Fruit Ninja. I think that's a reasonable expectation for a $250 device with an awesome build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U could say that. Putting sd801 doesn't mean that u can always expect the top notch performance. Not everyone does hardcore gaming on mobile leave that to pc. Looking at price point it's kinda perfect.
I knw some ppl would tell sd615 performs better but that's a newer chip.
Those scores really don´t do the OnePlus X justice. The device runs so smooth and fast it´s an incredible device for 250$! I had no lags at all since using it.
The oneplus x uses sd 8974AA
but the gpu is clocked at 578mhz just like AB and AC version
^ Interesting.
Specs and benchmarks aside, it's a really smooth and fluid experience. I can't tell the difference between the OPX and OPO regardless of the extra 5k or so in Antutu. They did a really good job with the hardware and software for a nice user experience.
Agreed with everyone!
I dont know why antutu benchmark is low on this device, it runs smooth and neverlags till now, even tough i have filled my device with all the daily apps i need ,
If u ask me, i guess oxygen os is again to be blamed here,
I m not sure about this, but on my previous device some custom rom offers a difference of almost 5-6 k. So i believe an update or custom rom might enhance the score,
But still antutu benchmark dosent matter to me if my device is running smoothly??
Yup ur right Oxygen OS is the enemy here... Can't wait for custom ROMs
do the benchmarks change after flashing the custom kernel? If so, can someone upload a pic of the new benchmarks and see how it compares?
NekoXiu said:
do the benchmarks change after flashing the custom kernel? If so, can someone upload a pic of the new benchmarks and see how it compares?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here you go on default settings of blu_spark v25 kernel
loveboy_lion said:
Here you go on default settings of blu_spark v25 kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, seems like benchmark didn't go up by much but the performance definitely is better !
41k
My antutu benchmark was 40801 with the stock kernel and stock cpu&gpu governor.
Changing both the CPU and GPU governors (on stock kernel) let me reach 43375.
I think there's room for further optimization.
By the way, the SOC version is nether AA or AB, since the complete code is
MSM8974PRO-AA,
just as this is a sort of "pro" version. In the table, the AA GPU frequency is 400 MHz, whereas in the OPX it is 578 MHz. I looks like qualcomm produced a newer version of the SOC, unsurprisingly the cited article, more than 1.5 years old, may didn't notice this.
Wow, my LG G2 is slightly faster? Disappointing because I got an invite and was going to buy one. Hmmmmm.
len_smith said:
Wow, my LG G2 is slightly faster? Disappointing because I got an invite and was going to buy one. Hmmmmm.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't hold to much stock in what the benchmarks have to say. On my one plus one some of the laggiest kernel's gave the best scores.
Though having said that has anyone looked in to the voltage tables and CPU binning? I suspect there is more useful information there than a whole bunch of benchmark scores.
I have always regarded CPU benchmarks to be more about management of heat and thermal throttling than user performance.
For example my old lg g2 would let the CPU bake at about 72° where as on my one plus one the CPU is pretty much brick walled at about 60°, thanks to my kernels very conservative thermal profile.
The result is disappointing benchmark scores of around 32-38 antutu's. But in day to day use the one plus one is much smoother than my old g2.
I could install the original cm12s and start scoring about 51 antutu's, but in day to day use that ROM is a lag monster in comparison to what I have now. Also I prefer not to thermally stress my phone to much with hot CPU's. That's what killed my g2.
A thread where all benchmarks are posted. Especially when comparing exynos vs SD 820
http://m.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s7_and_s7_edge_benchmarked_the_exynos_flavor-news-16794.php
Sent from my SM-G925F
Seems way of if you ask me.. should kill the z5... There is deff something wrong here!
johanbiff said:
Seems way of if you ask me.. should kill the z5... There is deff something wrong here!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Z5 is rendering in 1080p so there's no surprise it comes ahead in onscreen benchmarks. The mali-gpu is also not the strongest. Pretty sure the 820 will perform better.
---------- Post added at 12:55 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:14 AM ----------
http://www.phonearena.com/news/LG-G5-shakes-hands-with-Snapdragon-820-to-shatter-AnTuTu-records-benchmark-test-scores_id78636
LG G5 seems to be scoring almost 20k higher than the exynos 8890-equipped S7. S820 looks to be the better SoC by far at this point.
https://youtu.be/qMJ2x6POZak
128k there.i guess its the exynos
Anyway not enough to surpass the iphone
http://www.antutu.com/en/view.shtml?id=8184
s3ns3lol said:
https://youtu.be/qMJ2x6POZak
128k there.i guess its the exynos
Anyway not enough to surpass the iphone
http://www.antutu.com/en/view.shtml?id=8184
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously ? Do you even know how ios and android operate ?
Sent from my SM-G925F
To sum things up: the Snapdragon 820 sports a better GPU, the Exynos 8890 sports a better CPU and a better DAC (Qualcomm DACs just haven't got the best of reputations, while the Exynos usually sport a decent Wolfson DAC), Qualcomm SOCs however usually sport a better baseband/radio than the competition.
I would say, in daily usages, the performances should be negligible, the real impact between both should be battery life related, an early preview done on the Exynos 8890 version claims a 12hrs battery life at maximum brightness on the S7 (not the S7 Edge), I guess we will see how it goes when more reviews come in.
mathieulh said:
To sum things up: the Snapdragon 820 sports a better GPU, the Exynos 8890 sports a better CPU and a better DAC (Qualcomm DACs just haven't got the best of reputations, while the Exynos usually sport a decent Wolfson DAC), Qualcomm SOCs however usually sport a better baseband/radio than the competition.
I would say, in daily usages, the performances should be negligible, the real impact between both should be battery life related, an early preview done on the Exynos 8890 version claims a 12hrs battery life at maximum brightness on the S7 (not the S7 Edge), I guess we will see how it goes when more reviews come in.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No Wolfson this time. It seems Samsung is using an in-house DAC.
http://www.sammobile.com/2016/02/22...ony-imx260-camera-sensor-in-house-audio-chip/
Sent from my MI 3W using Tapatalk
skivnit said:
Seriously ? Do you even know how ios and android operate ?
Sent from my SM-G925F
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.And its irrelevant.that test is cross platform
s3ns3lol said:
Yes.And its irrelevant.that test is cross platform
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No you dont get it. Android uses multi cores to the fullest thats why multi core performance is the thing to look at, i suggest u read a piece on the subject on Anandtech
Sent from my SM-G925F
another benchmark between sd 820 and 8890:
www.anandtech.com/show/10075/early-exynos-8890-impressions
i hope the 4 core difference between the two doesn't mean worse performance on the sd 820 variant. Also if you in the EU you will -apparently- be getting the exynos variant :crying:
i also read somewhere that said that the sd 820 had 2x custom (kyro) a-72 cores and 2x custom (kyro) a-53 cores and not 4x cutom (kyro) a-72 cores, hope its not true.
s3ns3lol said:
Yes.And its irrelevant.that test is cross platform
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quoted from the comments of the article at AnandTech linked above:
It seems perfectly competitive in the graphics benchmarks, and comparing JavaScript benchmarks across different hardware, OS, and browser configurations is useless. To say Apple's Safari team "aggressively optimizes" for Octane and Kraken would be an understatement. Plus we're talking about simple benchmarks that can barely make any use of a second processor core, so of course they make the A9's dual-core CPU design look good next to more parallel competitors. Run something like Geekbench MT or the 3DMark physics test and watch A9 lose out to even Exynos 7420 or SD 810.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
overlordofdoom1 said:
another benchmark between sd 820 and 8890:
www.anandtech.com/show/10075/early-exynos-8890-impressions
i hope the 4 core difference between the two doesn't mean worse performance on the sd 820 variant. Also if you in the EU you will -apparently- be getting the exynos variant :crying:
i also read somewhere that said that the sd 820 had 2x custom (kyro) a-72 cores and 2x custom (kyro) a-53 cores and not 4x cutom (kyro) a-72 cores, hope its not true.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The s820 has two custom cores and two lower-clocked A53s. It really won't matter that it has two fewer larger cores, as more cores leads to more heat, and more heat to more throttling. Only in benchmarks will it be noticeable.
Toss3 said:
The s820 has two custom cores and two lower-clocked A53s.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where did you find that the 2 lower clocked are indeed A53s? What I have read, SD820 has 2 high clocked 2.15GHz and 2 low clocked 1.59GHz "Kryo cores"? So those 2 downclocked Kryo cores should be A72 like power not A53?
SAVVAS. said:
Where did you find that the 2 lower clocked are indeed A53s? What I have read, SD820 has 2 high clocked 2.15GHz and 2 low clocked 1.59GHz "Kryo cores"? So those 2 downclocked Kryo cores should be A72 like power not A53?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm not sure, but pretty sure they aren't the same cores as the faster ones, as that way they could just have clocked them higher, and have them downclock instead of having them at 1.59Ghz all the time.
GFX Bench battery and throttling test of exynos variant. From 2800 frames to 1400 in 10 minutes of load. http://4pda.ru/forum/index.php?s=&showtopic=707315&view=findpost&p=47363269
If some1 find snapdragon s7 results, please post it here.
TANKRED_ENDURES said:
GFX Bench battery and throttling test of exynos variant. From 2800 frames to 1400 in 10 minutes of load. http://4pda.ru/forum/index.php?s=&showtopic=707315&view=findpost&p=47363269
If some1 find snapdragon s7 results, please post it here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ouch i think for sd820 we have to wait a bit since its us and China only
Sent from my SM-G925F
TANKRED_ENDURES said:
GFX Bench battery and throttling test of exynos variant. From 2800 frames to 1400 in 10 minutes of load. http://4pda.ru/forum/index.php?s=&showtopic=707315&view=findpost&p=47363269
If some1 find snapdragon s7 results, please post it here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Says the test ran for 220 minutes. EDIT: Okey that was the results of the battery-test. But still where did you get 10 minutes from? If you look at the graphs you can clearly see that it dips only once to 1400 and that was at about the 1200 second mark (20 minutes).
http://www.talkandroid.com/286767-vivo-xplay-5-gets-benchmarked-on-antutu/#more-286767
Vivo Xplay 5 scored around 160k on Antutu and that is with the Snapdragon 820. Think Samsung should have stuck with Qualcomm for all regions this time around. Wish we could get the sd-version here in Europe as well.
Toss3 said:
http://www.talkandroid.com/286767-vivo-xplay-5-gets-benchmarked-on-antutu/#more-286767
Vivo Xplay 5 scored around 160k on Antutu and that is with the Snapdragon 820. Think Samsung should have stuck with Qualcomm for all regions this time around. Wish we could get the sd-version here in Europe as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its probably fake as most of the score comes from GPU which is impossible and then theres 1080p vs qhd screen question
Sent from my SM-G925F
Throttling looks much better compared to 7420.
They have made GPU wider and lower frequency, also better manufacturin process. Bound to get better compared to 7420.
---------- Post added at 12:02 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:01 AM ----------
skivnit said:
Its probably fake as most of the score comes from GPU which is impossible and then theres 1080p vs qhd screen question
Sent from my SM-G925F
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, in latest version of Antutu it gives more priority to onscreen numbers and single core performance. That's why iPhones are at top of chain in Antutu
Just noticed after doing benchmark tests that the results are showing all 8 cores clocking in at max of 1.8Ghz (which should be the co processors speed). The main should be 2.3Ghz according to Huawei's spec on the phone. Battery Management setting is set to Performance.
Just wondering if anyone else noticed this or has input?
yeah ive been seeing this on pretty much all apps thus far. my guess is that its an issue with reading the correct clocks on the A72 cores, only the weaker A53 cores seem to be registered and monitored. as long as your scores are fine i wouldnt worry too much about it cpu-wise, the kirin 950 is on par with SD820 and exynos 8890
Sent from my Huawei Mate 8 NXT-AL10 using Tapatalk
jbmc83 said:
yeah ive been seeing this on pretty much all apps thus far. my guess is that its an issue with reading the correct clocks on the A72 cores, only the weaker A53 cores seem to be registered and monitored. as long as your scores are fine i wouldnt worry too much about it cpu-wise, the kirin 950 is on par with SD820 and exynos 8890
Sent from my Huawei Mate 8 NXT-AL10 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just making sure we're not getting a device that's quite a step down in clock speed from what the manufacturer is telling us.
2.3 & 1.8 is quite a difference.
Sent from my HUAWEI NXT-L29 using XDA-Developers mobile app
mthorn79 said:
Just making sure we're not getting a device that's quite a step down in clock speed from what the manufacturer is telling us.
2.3 & 1.8 is quite a difference.
Sent from my HUAWEI NXT-L29 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2.3GHz is the max speed of big cores, and 1.8 is the max speed of the little cores. A lot of apps incorrectly report max speeds, core number...
ufoman said:
2.3GHz is the max speed of big cores, and 1.8 is the max speed of the little cores. A lot of apps incorrectly report max speeds, core number...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can understand that maybe some outdated apps could do this, like say Quadrant that hasn't been updated since 2012, but a top rated app like Antutu also reports 1.8...even CPUZ which has been the most accurate in desktop and mobile data even shows 1.8ghz. Should we just assume these apps can't read the A72 chip?
«Mate8»
So after using these tools:
Antutu
Geekbench 3
Quadrant
Vellamo
Cpuid
Vellamo was the only one to distinguish processors#1-#4 [email protected] and processors#5-#8 at 2.3ghz
«Mate8»
mthorn79 said:
So after using these tools:
Antutu
Geekbench 3
Quadrant
Vellamo
Cpuid
Vellamo was the only one to distinguish processors#1-#4 [email protected] and processors#5-#8 at 2.3ghz
«Mate8»
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Antutu 6 definitely shows 2,3GHz in info screens.
in Vellamo, if you look at benchmark details, you can see CPU going up to 2.,3GHz.
For most comprehensive information about the CPU, you might want to install AIDA64.
mthorn79 said:
So after using these tools:
Antutu
Geekbench 3
Quadrant
Vellamo
Cpuid
Vellamo was the only one to distinguish processors#1-#4 [email protected] and processors#5-#8 at 2.3ghz
«Mate8»
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This was taken using Chainfire's CPUMon while running Antutu :
if the A72 cores were really only ramping up to 1.8 ghz we wouldve noticed by now according to the geekbench scores, trust me
Sent from my Huawei Mate 8 NXT-AL10 using Tapatalk
Ok so ran Antutu again and now it's showing max freq @ 2.3...I swear last week it was showing 1.8 as max...oh well, all is good. False alarm.
«Mate8»
maybe theyve updated smth in the meantime
Sent from my Huawei Mate 8 NXT-AL10 using Tapatalk