Related
Anybody knows if LEO's hardware is capable of capturing HD video ?
The hardware (read speed) of LEO should be more than enough for HD I belive
Is WM 6.5 the limit or is it other things ?
That is an interesting question.
It should be capable. As HTC Bravo which will be released next year, also uses Snapdragon 1GHz, supports 720p video recording.
Given that the Leo isn't even capable of playing 720p video, I find it very hard to believe that it is capable of encoding 720p video in real time - encoding video is far more computationally intensive than decoding it.
WideVGA / WideNTSC
Well, 720p is maybe too much, but it definitely should record wide 800x480 videos (as Samsung Omnia) !
Shasarak said:
Given that the Leo isn't even capable of playing 720p video, I find it very hard to believe that it is capable of encoding 720p video in real time - encoding video is far more computationally intensive than decoding it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A bit inaccurate.
It is not capable of playing 720p video without hardware acceleration.
Actually, the hardware is capable of playing AND recording 720p video. We just can't use it because we don't have the software.
maati said:
A bit inaccurate.
It is not capable of playing 720p video without hardware acceleration.
Actually, the hardware is capable of playing AND recording 720p video. We just can't use it because we don't have the software.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
o really? How do we know that the Bravo perhaps doesn't have a specific hardware chip for 720p videos? Does the HD2 have such a chip or is snapdragon just capable?
Seeing the crap quality that we have in 640x480 with 20fps, I dout it that we will get 720 or 480P ever.
tsttse said:
o really? How do we know that the Bravo perhaps doesn't have a specific hardware chip for 720p videos? Does the HD2 have such a chip or is snapdragon just capable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's Snapdragon, which is not only the 1Ghz processor, but a platform that is capable of playing/recording 720p video.
If you convert a video to the right format, so that it uses the hardware acceleration, you can already play 720p right now.
This is the same with any phone and the reason why lots of phones only allow a specific file format (e.g. you have to convert anything you put on an iPhone with iTunes first).
maati said:
A bit inaccurate.
It is not capable of playing 720p video without hardware acceleration.
Actually, the hardware is capable of playing AND recording 720p video. We just can't use it because we don't have the software.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you cite any examples of an HD2 playing back 720p video at an acceptable frame-rate even with hardware acceleration?
What's with the Helicopter demo from the Omnia? Should work, afas I read.
EDIT: OK, I searched for it again, seems like it's not 720p but 480p. Seems like nobody has yet tried 720p with hardware acceleration?
maati said:
What's with the Helicopter demo from the Omnia? Should work, afas I read.
EDIT: OK, I searched for it again, seems like it's not 720p but 480p. Seems like nobody has yet tried 720p with hardware acceleration?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would you want to play a 720p video on a device that only has 480 resoltion?
johncmolyneux said:
Why would you want to play a 720p video on a device that only has 480 resoltion?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It means you don't have to faff about with video conversion - you can download just one version of the file for use either on a desktop PC or a phone.
However, the importance in the context of this thread (as you would know if you'd actually read it before posting in it ) is that if the HD2 cannot even decode 720p at a satisfactory rate, how could it possibly encode 720p video in real time, given that encoding is far more computationally intensive?
Shasarak said:
However, the importance in the context of this thread (as you would know if you'd actually read it before posting in it )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did read the thread. I was actually asking that poster a particular question that had nothing to do with the capabilities of the phone. Simple matter - an 800x480 screen will only play a video (in landscape) at a 480p maximum. Running 720p video will not look any better.
It was just a question. No need to ave a go.
Incidentally, I've got 720p videos converted from MKV to MPEG using the wonderful mkv2vob, and they play a treat.
this maybe possible I've came across ways to increase the bitrate at which the camera records at and also fps.
in a few days I may have another camera tweak but for video quality I'm just lookin for a exported red file viewer for ppc
johncmolyneux said:
I did read the thread. I was actually asking that poster a particular question that had nothing to do with the capabilities of the phone. Simple matter - an 800x480 screen will only play a video (in landscape) at a 480p maximum. Running 720p video will not look any better.
It was just a question. No need to ave a go.
Incidentally, I've got 720p videos converted from MKV to MPEG using the wonderful mkv2vob, and they play a treat.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are you saying ?? That you actually converted a 720p video (which is basically around 1280x720) to an Mpeg using MKV2VOB (which doesnt change the resolution, so its still around 1280x720) and you have manage to play it on HD2 ???
Jaqb said:
What are you saying ?? That you actually converted a 720p video (which is basically around 1280x720) to an Mpeg using MKV2VOB (which doesnt change the resolution, so its still around 1280x720) and you have manage to play it on HD2 ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, that's right. It played fine.
What player did you use ?
Jaqb said:
What player did you use ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CorePlayer (v1.3.6)
Coreplayer cannot play video greater than 1008x1008... So either you're lying or you're confused. But either way you're not playing 720p with Coreplayer.
the Iconia tablet (stock rom 3.2) has a most troubling issue: no (or no smooth) video playback of HD video files, mostly H.264 encoded mkv and mp4 files. Acer and Nvidia claim the device can run 720p and even 1080p in h264 base profile but the bitter reality is that even 90% of 720p video files don't play smoothy due to lack of proper hardware acceleration. this is really a huge disappointment as even most of today's discount phones can play 720p video and i got me a dual core device with a HD screen and a GPU from a dedicated graphics expert company but have to stick to SD video.
i found a statement in the Nvidia developer forum saying that Nvidia is working on this problem with some software partners which indicates that there might be a software solution to this sometime soon:
http://forums.developer.nvidia.com/...6/is-tegra-2-support-neon-intsruction-set-/p1
my question: is a software solution realistic or maybe just a waste of time? personally i doubt it, especially since the successor, Tegra 3, again includes NEON.
but maybe a custom rom like Thor could add enough horsepower to the device to enable at least smooth software decoding? anyone using this rom already noticed a performance gain?
i am looking forward to your comments.
Just install MX Video Player. Plays everything, perfectly smoothly.
FloatingFatMan said:
Just install MX Video Player. Plays everything, perfectly smoothly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you think i would investigate in hardware related stuff and post here if there was a player that could handle all HD video? MX player clearly does not, nor does any other player (dice, mobo, rock, just to name a few of the better ones) handle high profile H.264 video on Tegra 2 devices. so 90% of the stuff available online is not working, means they wont play at all or have massive framerate and sound issues. go and check out the latest movie trailers available in 1080p mp4 or download an x.264 encoded mkv file of your favourite tv show and you can see for yourself.
if you insist on your statement, then please put up a video source so i can verify. i would really love to learn that you are right and i have just a broken device ;-)
uli68 said:
you think i would investigate in hardware related stuff and post here if there was a player that could handle all HD video? MX player clearly does not, nor does any other player (dice, mobo, rock, just to name a few of the better ones) handle high profile H.264 video on Tegra 2 devices. so 90% of the stuff available online is not working, means they wont play at all or have massive framerate and sound issues. go and check out the latest movie trailers available in 1080p mp4 or download an x.264 encoded mkv file of your favourite tv show and you can see for yourself.
if you insist on your statement, then please put up a video source so i can verify. i would really love to learn that you are right and i have just a broken device ;-)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well if you're trying to play 1080p video on a device that only has a native resolution of 1280 x 800 as this statement indicates, then the joke is on you sir.
guys, please read my post carefully or even better inform yourself and stop posting such unhelpful comments.
kjy2010 said:
Well if you're trying to play 1080p video on a device that only has a native resolution of 1280 x 800 as this statement indicates, then the joke is on you sir.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's Acer and Nvidea who claim that Tegra 2 can play and output 1080p video (base profile h264) through HDMI, not me. i've just fallen for their marketing, trying to play some of my favourite 720p tv shows on my so called "HD device"...
also, i don't get your point about the resolution. are you trying to say that a full HD display is mandatory in order to enjoy a 1080p video? or that its content will look better if video resolution would match the Iconia display resolution? sorry sir, i really think you are the funny guy here.
uli68 said:
guys, please read my post carefully or even better inform yourself and stop posting such unhelpful comments.
it's Acer and Nvidea who claim that Tegra 2 can play and output 1080p video (base profile h264) through HDMI, not me. i've just fallen for their marketing, trying to play some of my favourite 720p tv shows on my so called "HD device"...
also, i don't get your point about the resolution. are you trying to say that you need full HD display in order to enjoy a 1080p video? or that its content will look better if video resolution would match the display resolution? sorry sir, i really think you are the funny guy here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK I guess I'll just have to write you off as a n00btard if you think that playing a 1080p video on a 1280 x 800 screen will benefit you in any way, shape, or form roflol
kjy2010 said:
OK I guess I'll just have to write you off as a n00btard if you think that playing a 1080p video on a 1280 x 800 screen will benefit you in any way, shape, or form roflol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i did not say i wanted to play 1080p on my device - you are clearly not able to read and most probably just a fanboy.
besides, i still don't get your point. i would chose 1080p over 720p if i had the choice. and you would stick to 720p or SD because you think there is no "benefit" in playing higher resolution content on smaller display? well, quantified the benefit would be at least 80 lines more content, don't you think?
there might be cases where a hard- or software scaler messes up while downscaling a video and picture quality degrades, but generally the higher the resolution the better the picture quality, regardless of display resolution.
now, back to topic please!
uli68 said:
i did not say i wanted to play 1080p on my device - you are clearly not able to read and most probably just a fanboy.
now, back to topic please!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1.........................
uli68 said:
it's Acer and Nvidea who claim that Tegra 2 can play and output 1080p video (base profile h264) through HDMI, not me. i've just fallen for their marketing, trying to play some of my favourite 720p tv shows on my so called "HD device"...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Atleast I can play baseline and normal profile H.264 content at 1080p just fine. It's only high-profile that reverts to software and doesn't play well.
are you trying to say that a full HD display is mandatory in order to enjoy a 1080p video?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The display itself is 720p, so trying to play 1080p content on a 720p display is kind of pointless. You won't see the extra resolution anyways. Though if you're playing through HDMI to a 1080p display then it makes sense.
---------- Post added at 01:58 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:53 AM ----------
uli68 said:
but generally the higher the resolution the better the picture quality, regardless of display resolution.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not entirely correct. Higher resolution doesn't equal better compression quality, so you can easily have 1080p video that looks like ass crap, and you can have SD video that looks better.
That said there are lots of reasons to choose 720p over 1080p on A500: 720p high-profile video generally looks much better than 1080p baseline-profile, high-profile fares a lot better in high-motion scenes, and high-profile takes less storage space than baseline-profile. And well, since you can't see the extra resolution anyways you're just wasting extra storage space on stuff you can't even see.
http://www.arm.com/community/partners/display_product/rw/ProductId/5770/
clearly states 1080p support via HDMI output.... is this what your after???
uli68 said:
my question: is a software solution realistic or maybe just a waste of time? personally i doubt it, especially since the successor, Tegra 3, again includes NEON.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A software solution will only boost applications that are specifically designed to utilize it, and the hardware simply isn't fast enough to decode 1080p high-profile in software at full speed, so no, no matter what NVIDIA is claiming they cannot do magic tricks here.
but maybe a custom rom like Thor could add enough horsepower to the device to enable at least smooth software decoding? anyone using this rom already noticed a performance gain?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thor or some other custom ROM can only increase clock speed, there is nothing else to be done about it. And you can increase clock speed even on the stock ROM anyways.
But as I mentioned I have absolutely no problem running 1080p baseline- or normal-profile content, or 720p content, because I am not using the stock player. Use one of the players from Android Market, they're a lot faster and smarter than the stock player.
Also an important note to you: the stock player reverts to SOFTWARE if audio is AC3 encoded. That is probably the issue you're seeing. The players from Android Market do AC3 in software, but send the video to the hardware, so that's why they don't lag with AC3 audio.
uli68 said:
i did not say i wanted to play 1080p on my device - you are clearly not able to read and most probably just a fanboy.
besides, i still don't get your point. i would chose 1080p over 720p if i had the choice. and you would stick to 720p or SD because you think there is no "benefit" in playing higher resolution content on smaller display? well, quantified the benefit would be at least 80 lines more content, don't you think?
there might be cases where a hard- or software scaler messes up while downscaling a video and picture quality degrades, but generally the higher the resolution the better the picture quality, regardless of display resolution.
now, back to topic please!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was on topic, if you can't understand that attempting to play 1080p Res videos on a 1280x800 display has no benefits whatsoever, then maybe you need one of These.
I honestly don't understand what is so friggin' tough about understanding the concept, and you clearly stated 1080p in your first post.
He's trying to playback through the HDMI port, muppet.
Here ya go, educate yourself.
" If the incoming source has more pixels than the display's native resolution, you will lose some visible detail and sharpness, though often what you're left with still looks great. If the incoming source has fewer pixels than the native resolution, you're not getting any extra sharpness from the television's pixels."
http://reviews.cnet.com/hdtv-resolution/
guys, and ladies, please, this thread is not about pro and contra of full hd content on smaller displays.
the question is:
is it likely that (at some point soon) there will be a workaround to overcome the issue of the missing NEON video instruction set on Tegra 2?
again, my goal is not to play 1080p content on my Iconia, just some 720p stuff, mostly TV shows encoded in H264 high profile mkv files. and no, they wont run using MX player or any other player currently available. and i guess that's also due to the missing NEON. please see the link provided in my first post.
uli68 said:
guys, and ladies, please, this thread is not about pro and contra of full hd content on smaller displays.
the question is:
is it likely that (at some point soon) there will be a workaround to overcome the issue of the missing NEON video instruction set on Tegra 2?
again, my goal is not to play 1080p content on my Iconia, just some 720p stuff, mostly TV shows encoded in H264 high profile mkv files. and no, they wont run using MX player or any other player currently available. and i guess that's also due to the missing NEON. please see the link provided in my first post.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already answered your questions.
WereCatf said:
A software solution will only boost applications that are specifically designed to utilize it, and the hardware simply isn't fast enough to decode 1080p high-profile in software at full speed, so no, no matter what NVIDIA is claiming they cannot do magic tricks here.
Thor or some other custom ROM can only increase clock speed, there is nothing else to be done about it. And you can increase clock speed even on the stock ROM anyways.
But as I mentioned I have absolutely no problem running 1080p baseline- or normal-profile content, or 720p content, because I am not using the stock player. Use one of the players from Android Market, they're a lot faster and smarter than the stock player.
Also an important note to you: the stock player reverts to SOFTWARE if audio is AC3 encoded. That is probably the issue you're seeing. The players from Android Market do AC3 in software, but send the video to the hardware, so that's why they don't lag with AC3 audio.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks. well, in respect to 1080p content i don't have much hope either. but, and again, 720p content encoded in h264 high profile does NOT work for me. i have massive framerate issues and sound also drops off completely after a few seconds. i tested with google, rockplayer and mx player (all of the latest builds).
here's another example file for you and everyone else to check and report back:
The.Walking.Dead.S02E06.PROPER.720p.HDTV.x264-ORENJI.mkv
Who's the ignoramus?
kjy2010 said:
Here ya go, educate yourself.
" If the incoming source has more pixels than the display's native resolution, you will lose some visible detail and sharpness, though often what you're left with still looks great. If the incoming source has fewer pixels than the native resolution, you're not getting any extra sharpness from the television's pixels."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You sir are an ignorant boor who is incapable of reading. You couldn't read the posts properly and you can't even read your quote properly.
A 1080p file has more visual information. For example, it's possible to see a small mole on somebodies face in 1080p that in 720p or lower has been smoothed out and is now invisible. Playing that 1080p file on a lower resolution device gives the possibility that the mole will be visible depending on how the hardware scaling is done and since most hardware scaling isn't going for compressed file size and won't be applying gaussian blurs etc... you WILL see that mole.
The new Nook Tablet and Kindle Fire have the same screen resolution, one streams videos at SD and the other at HD. Now even though the tablet isn't capable of HD the one that streams HD is noticably sharper and has more detail. Go look up the pictures if you want. Take your own advice and educate yourself before you berate people for their ignorance when it is you who are ignorant with poor reading comprehension.
jmc23 said:
A 1080p file has more visual information. For example, it's possible to see a small mole on somebodies face in 1080p that in 720p or lower has been smoothed out and is now invisible. Playing that 1080p file on a lower resolution device gives the possibility that the mole will be visible depending on how the hardware scaling is done and since most hardware scaling isn't going for compressed file size and won't be applying gaussian blurs etc... you WILL see that mole.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mate, it doesn't work like that. It doesn't matter if the picture is scaled down before compression or after decompression, it's still scaled down. And no sane compression technology uses gaussian blur.
The new Nook Tablet and Kindle Fire have the same screen resolution, one streams videos at SD and the other at HD. Now even though the tablet isn't capable of HD the one that streams HD is noticably sharper and has more detail. Go look up the pictures if you want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The difference is due to the fact that the HD video is compressed with better quality settings than the SD video. Besides, Kindle Fire IS 1024x600 pixels in size which means it is indeed almost 720p HD resolution meaning that HD content only needs to be scaled down by 120 lines whereas SD content has to be scaled UP instead: well, OF COURSE it will look like crap.
In other words you're comparing apples and oranges and you don't know what you're talking about either.
---------- Post added at 08:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:44 PM ----------
uli68 said:
here's another example file for you and everyone else to check and report back:
The.Walking.Dead.S02E06.PROPER.720p.HDTV.x264-ORENJI.mkv
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just tried that file with Dice Player. It stutters for about 5 seconds, then settles down and works like a dream. In other words, working just fine on my tablet.
I had problems playing 720p mkv files as well, no matter which player I used. The stock 3.2 rom appears to be missing the framework for hardware decoding of these files. No such problems since installing various Thor roms though. They all play fine now. 1080p is probably too much though. I use mx player by the way.
4k recording is on lte not in 3g.is it true?
if 3g version dosnot have 4k recording then ..there will b patch to record 4k records?let me know
Snap Processor - LTE & 4K recording
Octa Processor - More Ram & 4 Cores but no LTE or 4k
It boils down to processors not 3g
Nope, there will never be any patch. Hardware limitation.
BTW, do you have a 4K TV or a monitor? If not, I find it hard to understand why would you need a 4K. If you have a 4K display, then it makes sense for you.
CLARiiON said:
BTW, do you have a 4K TV or a monitor? If not, I find it hard to understand why would you need a 4K. If you have a 4K display, then it makes sense for you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
May be he has. May be does not. Who cares? Let technology spread out. Otherwise we would have stuck with 3GP and low bitrate MP4s.
I totally agree 4k content atm really rare but so did 1080p. Did people sat idle and stuck with 3GP recording in the fear that OMG! 1080p is so huge!!!!!!! I would not buy a 64 GB card for that.
4k is a nice addition. And to your other point-before 1080p displays came out all the 720p display like S3 were able to shoot and playback 1080p. Did anyone question why 1080p on a 720p native display? No.
I have seen two 4k samples and yes I am excited. Specially from the phonearena sample the moving tree leaves looked outstandingly crisp. And if I am the one out of 10 million people who cares about 4k it wont stuck with me forever. With more devices gonna have 4k native [already started to] display and storage like 128 GB 4k will become regular thing. And to be regular stuff like 1080ps or 720ps initiatives like this will naturally occur.
People just cannot keep other people discouraged from a nice tech evolution. If they would succeed people would never move beyond 2 GB memory card and low bitrate 3GP or .rmv video contents and shoot straight out the people who consume ogg music files.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
4k video was just a gimmick I feel. If you dont have device to play 4k content like pc or Tv, there is no point of 4k. Its good that Asians won't get it
i have seen the video comparison b/w 4k n 1080p..too much difference..thats y i like 4k..too much detailed in 4k
have a look
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXiWGD18N3c
Costco had a 4k TV playing the same movie as a 1080p TV and I could genuinely tell the difference. But unfortunately my wallet is a bit too small to early adopt the 4k TV's right now
I'm as much for future-proofing as anyone else here. But where is 4K content coming from and how's it being delivered? Content upscaled to 4K (EG: HD TV/Movies originally captured in 720/1080P) aren't going to look any better than they would on a 720P/1080P TV or monitor. They’ll most likely look worse. 4K content is huge. All the ISPs are already *****ing about what video's doing to their networks. How long did it take for Blu-Ray to become a standard? And the only Blu-Ray that looked good was what was natively captured in HD not the upscaled crap like 50's I love Lucy episodes. So for 4K to become meaningful content producers need to start capturing in it. That 'aint gonna be happening fast as the only ones that benefit from 4K as it stands are the TV manufacturers and they aren't significant enough in the food chain to drive standards forward. So we'll probably all be on the Note 4 (and more likely the N5) when UHD (4K) gains any real traction. Because traction requires native content.
So would I want 4K in the N3? Sure, who wouldn't want extra "cool" stuff for the same price. Would I ever use it to record anything? No, the files are huge and would have to be downscaled to my 1080P TVs, monitors, and devices making natively captured 1080P look better anyway. Am I going to run out and buy 4K playback devices? Absolutely. As soon as at least 1/3 of the content I playback is available in UHD.
An interesting article...
http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-33199_7-57566079-221/why-ultra-hd-4k-tvs-are-still-stupid/
nabilsweet007 said:
i have seen the video comparison b/w 4k n 1080p..too much difference..thats y i like 4k..too much detailed in 4k
have a look
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow 4k looks really nice. Phonearena posted the sample 4k video but it was useless because youtube converts it to 1080p. The native 1080p video that they posted looked better than 4k on youtube. I can't wait to use 4k. It might not be every time I go to record something but if I love being able to have that option.
sohebq said:
4k video was just a gimmick I feel. If you dont have device to play 4k content like pc or Tv, there is no point of 4k. Its good that Asians won't get it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It amazes me how short-sighted some people are to say stuff like that. You and Clariion, 2 posts above you, as well as many other people in different threads...Videos, recorded with your phone's camcorder are memories for life. Do you record something only to watch it right away and be done with, never watch it again? 20 years ago, when there was only VHS available - if someone offered you a device, which can record video in DVD quality, would you say "no" to that, because your current TV can only play VHS resolution?...
You're saying "I don't want to record much better quality video just because right now I don't have a TV, that can play it." . In a few years 4k TVs will be a standard in every house, and you'll be watching your wedding's video in sh*itty 1080p, because you chose not to get 4k camcorder just because you didnt have a playback device for it at the time...
I can't believe some of you don't see the benefits of 4k even if you plan on never getting a 4k TV. While recording in 4k, just your ability to digitally zoom while maintaining excellent quality should be worth the feature being present. It's basically lossless digital zoom (up to a point of course.) I can't imagine anyone not wanting that.
Hi,
Is the Nexus 6P supports HEVC encoding? When I record a UHD video, it appears to encode using H264 and I don't see the encoder in android.media.MediaCodecList.
Seems unexpected since the Snapdragon 810 offers HEVC capabilities.
cheers
bernick said:
Hi,
Is the Nexus 6P supports HEVC encoding? When I record a UHD video, it appears to encode using H264 and I don't see the encoder in android.media.MediaCodecList.
Seems unexpected since the Snapdragon 810 offers HEVC capabilities.
cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In addition, it seems like I cannot use the AVC high profile. When I request so, I always get: "Use baseline profile instead of 8 for AVC recording"
bernick said:
In addition, it seems like I cannot use the AVC high profile. When I request so, I always get: "Use baseline profile instead of 8 for AVC recording"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's a few things that really burns my butt about owning a Nexus 6P. One is no 1080p 60FPS and the second is it doesnt record in h.265. I feel your pain.
Gytole said:
There's a few things that really burns my butt about owning a Nexus 6P. One is no 1080p 60FPS and the second is it doesnt record in h.265. I feel your pain.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But do you think it is only a software constraint that could be worked around, since the snapdragon 810 has hevc encoding capabilities?
bernick said:
But do you think it is only a software constraint that could be worked around, since the snapdragon 810 has hevc encoding capabilities?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I feel as if it is. There's no reason why it doesnt use it. The phones fast enougj, the ram and internal storage are fast enough it just doesnt nake sense. Maybe it's the sensor? If the API doesnt have support for it through the driver then it won't happen anytime soon
Gytole said:
I feel as if it is. There's no reason why it doesnt use it. The phones fast enougj, the ram and internal storage are fast enough it just doesnt nake sense. Maybe it's the sensor? If the API doesnt have support for it through the driver then it won't happen anytime soon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well good news, I have installed Android N and the HEVC encoder is available (not sure about [email protected]).
Hi guys, G4 plus for is there any 1080p 60fps application and mod ?
I don't think there's hardware to encode 1080p at 60fps and the CPU is not strong enough for software encoding. I don't know if even 720p can be done.
Stock slowmotion is something like 540p so 1080p is so much larger than that even 60fps is not feasible
guessingagain said:
I don't think there's hardware to encode 1080p at 60fps and the CPU is not strong enough for software encoding. I don't know if even 720p can be done.
Stock slowmotion is something like 540p so 1080p is so much larger than that even 60fps is not feasible
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agree
guessingagain said:
I don't think there's hardware to encode 1080p at 60fps and the CPU is not strong enough for software encoding. I don't know if even 720p can be done.
Stock slowmotion is something like 540p so 1080p is so much larger than that even 60fps is not feasible
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Similar characteristics phones making 1080P 60fps, I think g4 plus is enough. for example; samsung galaxy s5 making record 1080p 60fps, even doing the 2160p 30fps
The processor we have does support video recording up to 1080p 60FPS. However, I do not know whether other hardware on the device inhibits that or not.
https://www.qualcomm.com/products/snapdragon/processors/617
zeomal said:
The processor we have does support video recording up to 1080p 60FPS. However, I do not know whether other hardware on the device inhibits that or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for information, I believe future 60 fps mod.
it“s doable hit me up on telegram if rooted @defcomk
defcomg said:
it“s doable hit me up on telegram if rooted @defcomk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would be nice to provide a solution for ALL here on xda instead of another platform. The purpose of XDA is to provide help for all from all xdaians. Keep in mind.
strongst said:
Would be nice to provide a solution for ALL here on xda instead of another platform. The purpose of XDA is to provide help for all from all xdaians. Keep in mind.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know i just prefer to debug via telegram and post working solution i feel feedback via posts is delayed if xda had live chat feature it would be great