Hey there Moto 2 gen users good news ,I was searching on Github and found this https://github.com/MotorolaMobilityLLC/kernel-msm/issues/4
and when i searched it in the Moto kernel source I found the source https://github.com/MotorolaMobilityLLC/kernel-msm/tree/kitkat-4.4.4-release-titan
I hope this is fresh news, sorry if this has been told and now we need devs to get started on this...
Sorry if i made a mistake
We already knew about it. Yes it's old news.
and it's already here (It's in same section and on same page as of your thread)
also there is one custom kernel released for g 2nd gen after sources released (28/10)
http://cleanimport.xda/index.php?threads/2921396/
bhavin192 said:
We already knew about it. Yes it's old news.
and it's already here (It's in same section and on same page as of your thread)
also there is one custom kernel released for g 2nd gen after sources released (28/10)
http://cleanimport.xda/index.php?threads/2921396/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With helpful quote I will close this thread
Related
So does this mean we can expect Android 2.3 on Samsung Galaxy S now...
supercurio said:
Hello it's my first post in the Nexus S forums, probably not the latest
History for the Nexus S sources begins now.
Original source is here :
http://twitter.com/#!/dnaltews/status/14849739858116608
By Brian Swetland, Android kernel developer
Thank you Brian !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's probably a whole lot of other things to do other than getting the kernel to work on the Galaxy S, I have no idea the amount of work which as to be done to get gingerbread booting on the Galaxy.
You could have posted this on one of the other threads already about the kernel sources being released instead of opening up a new thread...
ya i could...how can delete this thread or only a mod can do this
htc have released source code at htcdev.com, including i have noted, a gingerbread update for desire. would these releases make it easier for hd2 android development?
it will be an interesting next few weeks
1. Wrong forum
2. Already posted on the main news page
3. Gingerbread for desire is released last week already but not the kernel source
4. Source codes were always there on the htcdev site, nothing new
Dont post things too fast m8, i know everyone is excited about the desire gingerbread rom and how it potentially can fix the graphic glitches on the sense roms (is'nt even sure it will be fixed).
Please correct me if i'm wrong i dont think there is much to develop anymore for our HD2's as there are android builds that run as fast as stable as any generic android device.
The only big thing i can imagine that still can be developed is true 720p recording and i dont know if the source code will help getting this to work. i'm not a dev
a dead man said:
would these releases make it easier for hd2 android development?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it's not a source code of Desire kernel but "only" upgrade Desire to Ginger.
a dead man said:
htc have released source code at htcdev.com, including i have noted, a gingerbread update for desire. would these releases make it easier for hd2 android development?
it will be an interesting next few weeks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thisa was posted yesterday and was in the wrong forum and you have done it again today, there is already 2 other threads about this going in Q&A
needs KERNEL source not the release of GB
I know this is a dead thread, but one question that has been on my mind. If a kernel can be compiled can't the kernel be decompiled to study the source code? Just a thought.
[email protected] said:
I know this is a dead thread, but one question that has been on my mind. If a kernel can be compiled can't the kernel be decompiled to study the source code? Just a thought.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Decompiled software is very hard to read, follow and understand. The "decompilation" process does not result in the original source code but in assembler code, which is big, ugly and meant for machines not people.
deviant007 said:
Decompiled software is very hard to read, follow and understand. The "decompilation" process does not result in the original source code but in assembler code, which is big, ugly and meant for machines not people.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay. Thank you for the answer.
One question guys, may be in the wrong thread but excuse me. I just wondering...HTC realesed upgrade for Desire some time ago, Is it that they are not yet published the source code does not break the rules of the General Public License (GPL)?
Hi guys ! I've just discovered such a sourceforge page http://sourceforge.net/motorola/wiki/Projects/
There's a Bravo tree and a package available to download. It looks like Motorola opened Bravo sources.
I'm not sure so I need as many help as possible.
PsyClip-R said:
Hi guys ! I've just discovered such a sourceforge page http://sourceforge.net/motorola/wiki/Projects/
There's a Bravo tree and a package available to download. It looks like Motorola opened Bravo sources.
I'm not sure so I need as many help as possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, its the sources Motorola used before they applied their patches...the kernel provided is the same one thats in the Defy, MS2, and some of the Droid phone sources. Sadly, they're not as helpful as you'd think they'd be, seeing as its the source code for the Droid\Sholes platform -- all device references in the code are for OG Droid and OG Milestone.
//That said, I've been interested in downloading all of it and compiling a rom from the Moto Sources. I haven't because I'm not that interested in doing it.
skeevy420 said:
Yep, its the sources Motorola used before they applied their patches...the kernel provided is the same one thats in the Defy, MS2, and some of the Droid phone sources. Sadly, they're not as helpful as you'd think they'd be, seeing as its the source code for the Droid\Sholes platform -- all device references in the code are for OG Droid and OG Milestone.
//That said, I've been interested in downloading all of it and compiling a rom from the Moto Sources. I haven't because I'm not that interested in doing it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well yes, maybe Quarx used these sources to compile a new build. I'm not shure..
Also i think motorola did that because of google bought it.
PsyClip-R said:
Well yes, maybe Quarx used these sources to compile a new build. I'm not shure..
Also i think motorola did that because of google bought it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty sure they're the ones he used.
Ya know, I've always wondered if something in there could help with the camera on MS2Ginger or if it would be possible to compile a Moto GB rom while adding in some of the kobe sources. I've also been wondering if it would be possible to port over some Moto ICS or JB roms if *insert Defy Dev here* manages to get a working 3.x kernel running. I really do like MS2...sucks I can't get 4.0 to boot on the Defy .
I really hope my hand starts feeling better soon. I gotta take a 30 second break from typing every 6-9 words.
PROTIP -- Don't let boiling water pour on your hand.
as soon as L comes to us, development on moto g2 roms will boom ! its a waiting game and i can understand not wanting to put your time into kk because it will be gone real soon
Or maybe MAYBE it's because we don't have the kernel sources
-------------------------
Dude they are waiting for kernel source and I hope they will release if after android L release
Ohh moto please be open source, Don't be Samsung, I buyed this because I thought moto was open but 2 months and no kernel source, does not sound good
Mohdsultan said:
Dude they are waiting for kernel source and I hope they will release if after android L release
Ohh moto please be open source, Don't be Samsung, I buyed this because I thought moto was open but 2 months and no kernel source, does not sound good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same happened with Moto G 1st gen, just wait
jrny99 said:
as soon as L comes to us, development on moto g2 roms will boom ! its a waiting game and i can understand not wanting to put your time into kk because it will be gone real soon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its partially true as if sources were out,we would have some nice kk roms(customs)
and who knows what 5.0 will carry behind its name
Gabboplano said:
Or maybe MAYBE it's because we don't have the kernel sources
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good man you got me laughing i know the main reason is lack of those sources thats keeping custom roms:good:
---------- Post added at 04:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:34 PM ----------
Mohdsultan said:
Dude they are waiting for kernel source and I hope they will release if after android L release
Ohh moto please be open source, Don't be Samsung, I buyed this because I thought moto was open but 2 months and no kernel source, does not sound good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good:yes man they are gonna release sources ,they are Moto not Samsung, and its better late than not coming,
and u know what my reason was jst the same as yours ,i always prefer something other than samsung(thats my views based on my views)
Motorola has taken some heat for not pushing Lollipop kernel source as required, even though it started updated its devices to Android 5.0 way back in late 2014. Well, it's doing so now. Developers, head to Moto's GitHub to download.
Here is the link
https://github.com/MotorolaMobilityLLC/kernel-msm/tags
Old news..
Most of DEvs are notified now
sanchit0403 said:
Motorola has taken some heat for not pushing Lollipop kernel source as required, even though it started updated its devices to Android 5.0 way back in late 2014. Well, it's doing so now. Developers, head to Moto's GitHub to download.
Here is the link
https://github.com/MotorolaMobilityLLC/kernel-msm/tags
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well now you ask the moderator to lock this thread. Most of the devs are notified regarding this.