Database Users

ParanoidAndroid for the TF101

Any thoughts on if you guys would want it? I know I do!!
I have been trying the past few days to make a port from source but I don't know how to code and the code wont fully download.
If anybody else wants to try, please do cause I really want it ParanoidAndroid on my device here.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using XDA Premium HD app

My limited knowledge of Paranoid Android leads me to ask - why do you want it on the Tf?
Isn't it designed to give a tablet like experience on phones?
As well made as it is, I wasn't overly keen on the whole tiny u.i on my sgs2.
Otherwise I'm not sure what we would be missing out on.

Application-specific DPI settings would make me one happy panda.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk 2

scottyf79 said:
My limited knowledge of Paranoid Android leads me to ask - why do you want it on the Tf?
Isn't it designed to give a tablet like experience on phones?
As well made as it is, I wasn't overly keen on the whole tiny u.i on my sgs2.
Otherwise I'm not sure what we would be missing out on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I want it because I like the Nexus 7 UI better and also some companies make better phone apps then they do Tablet versions.

dotmaniac said:
I want it because I like the Nexus 7 UI better and also some companies make better phone apps then they do Tablet versions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I have actually compiled ParanoidAndroid 2.12 jellybean rom for the tf101... is a big buggy, but you're welcome to try it...
Just need to try a couple more things to sort out a couple of bugs...
btw, I'm not a developer, and just started compiling, so it will not be perfect at any stage...

mattmanwrx said:
Hi, I have actually compiled ParanoidAndroid 2.12 jellybean rom for the tf101... is a big buggy, but you're welcome to try it...
Just need to try a couple more things to sort out a couple of bugs...
btw, I'm not a developer, and just started compiling, so it will not be perfect at any stage...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow nice, do you have a download link? id like to give it a try

JoinTheRealms said:
Wow nice, do you have a download link? id like to give it a try
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm just compiling another build now... will test that and then give out a download link tomorrow...
If there is enough interest, I may create a thread in the development section...
As I said though, it is quite buggy...
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium

mattmanwrx said:
I'm just compiling another build now... will test that and then give out a download link tomorrow...
If there is enough interest, I may create a thread in the development section...
As I said though, it is quite buggy...
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is too late for me though!
My TF101 got run over by a School Bus! But I hope everybody else enjoys it then!

I would love to see this rom on the tf101

dotmaniac said:
It is too late for me though!
My TF101 got run over by a School Bus! But I hope everybody else enjoys it then!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, that's a shame... hopefully the school helped towards a new one? Could have got away with homework being on it though and getting an extension...
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
---------- Post added at 02:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:28 PM ----------
i9apps said:
I would love to see this rom on the tf101
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will post it later... my build last night didn't do what I wanted it to, as soon as I get home from work I will sync and build again... should be done around half 8 GMT (is half 2 GMT now)...
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium

could be interesting. woud be nice to see if any of our other devs would be interested in helping you to iron out the imperfections and take it forward.
Always nice to have an extra rom to mess with
Quick yes or no ? for you......dock supported?

scottyf79 said:
could be interesting. woud be nice to see if any of our other devs would be interested in helping you to iron out the imperfections and take it forward.
Always nice to have an extra rom to mess with
Quick yes or no ? for you......dock supported?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes - dock is supported... Well, at least it was working for me last night... Don't have a large SD card to test on it, but it should work (as i'm using the same device tree as others)...
As stated earlier, this is my first proper build (running a CM10 build on my phone, not released though). It would be nice to get others to help, at the moment, ADB doesn't work, everything I have tested is working, including Paranoid Settings... None of my builds seems to have ADB, so i do need to look into that!
As there seems to be enough interest, I think I will open a thread later - will link to it here though so you can all see it!

nice - look forward to it.:good:

Please make this happen

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=31770791#post31770791 - thread as promised...

Idea for 3.x Kernel

hello,
i posted it in the ICS update thread:
Hey, silly question, i know, think it would be asked many times.
i wanne opend a new thread at dev, but i cant't to less comments --_--
now, we know, we never get a 3.X kernel from moto, so, we must help us at our own, i asked me, how?
my idea was, what abei the LG P990, i heard, there are 3.x kernel, no officiel, i know.
What are the hardware differences at the LG and the atrix? fingerprint and camera, i know, but what about the rest?
it it identicly? is it possible, that we can work with it? at beginning, without camera and fingerprint?
perhaps we found an other device with an identicly camera and 3.x kernel, perhaps we can look in a direction like that? only moto bashing wont help anyway
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i hope any dev get give informations to me?

the developers already know that moto left us behind..
they're talking about it and what they are going to do??..just the time will tell us...we have to wait hehe
I'm not a developer but sometimes i asked then about start the work from some other similar device's kernel (same that you're suggesting here)..they told that it's an idea but should be necessary a massive rewriting...so it's not easy and they will need time even if the device is similar..

thats the point, i think we don't have any other chance, similar devices kernel, or from scratch, the second is the option which needs more time, i think
i wanne call me a developer, nothing in comparsion with our big ones but i would like to help your devs and i think, i'm not the only one, but i don't know how - i know that is many work and needs massive rewriting, but it's our only option.
i only hope some devs would found together and can say, how we, the, i wanne call it "non-kernel-hackers" , can help.

sw0pt5 said:
Why Defy can use Froyo kernel for CM9?
Why Defy can use GB kernel for CM10?
Why Defy bootloader is locked but still have a better development?
Defy also only have GB, no ICS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure if you noticed but the defy and the atrix are two very different phones.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app

sw0pt5 said:
And two group of devs
but using same kind of OS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not as simple as that. Each device is different regardless of the OS. If you think our devs aren't good enough or they aren't trying hard enough then I'm sure you know exactly how to do it so just try yourself .
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app

I just ask quarx for help...
Quarx said:
Cocolopes said:
Hi quarx!
I want to ask you something...how you do to make hwa work on jb for defy?...I ask this because in atrix forum we are mad cos motorola **** us not releasen ICS...
So I think...in first time the problem on defy was the locked bootloader...but you get it work. Atrix has an unlocked bootloader..and we have Nvidia drivers...and I think there is a phone using the same tegra chip on a 2.x kernel...soooo its possible to make something?
If the answer is YES...and you know how to do it...maybe the atrix comunity can donate to you to buy an atrix...
Sorry for the bad english...and I wait for your answer..thank in advance!
from the (m)ATRIX...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need update EGL libs and kernel drvier for this libs.
Hwa should work automatically.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We have great devs working on atrix...the best ones....but we have no choice...we need help...so...
from the (m)ATRIX... no more moto!

I think atrix slowly died

sw0pt5 said:
Exactly!
Just hope someone can make a smooth CM7 with all the best tweats.
Actually, the stock ROM is quite reliable as daily driver.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
base gb on cm7 or miui

Thread moved to general and cleaned.
There will be no more flaming here.....

I know of a dev that might be able to help us, as he has made CM10 stable Kernels for many devices and might be able to help us. He goes by the name of Hashcode, I'd link to a profile but I'm on mobile at the moment x.x
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium

MewRai95 said:
I know of a dev that might be able to help us, as he has made CM10 stable Kernels for many devices and might be able to help us. He goes by the name of Hashcode, I'd link to a profile but I'm on mobile at the moment x.x
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please. Any help would be appreciated.

MewRai95 said:
I know of a dev that might be able to help us, as he has made CM10 stable Kernels for many devices and might be able to help us. He goes by the name of Hashcode, I'd link to a profile but I'm on mobile at the moment x.x
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/member.php?u=4243514

i worte a message to him, i hope he can help us
i'm glad, that this thread went to the direction i thought about at starting it

Anyway, i think that our best chances is to raise a found, by donating, and offer it as a bounty for the first dev to create a 3.x kernel for our device. We might find someone that way. Create that kernel takes lots of time and skills. Very very few people are willing to invest all the time required for free.

djluis48 said:
Anyway, i think that our best chances is to raise a found, by donating, and offer it as a bounty for the first dev to create a 3.x kernel for our device. We might find someone that way. Create that kernel takes lots of time and skills. Very very few people are willing to invest all the time required for free.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agree

Cocolopes said:
I just ask quarx for help...
We have great devs working on atrix...the best ones....but we have no choice...we need help...so...
from the (m)ATRIX... no more moto!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got a response?

MewRai95 said:
I know of a dev that might be able to help us, as he has made CM10 stable Kernels for many devices and might be able to help us. He goes by the name of Hashcode, I'd link to a profile but I'm on mobile at the moment x.x
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes hashcode is awesome developer and he has got kexec working one the droid razr/razr maxxx, bionoic and droid 3 I think..

djluis48 said:
Got a response?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes...but I think he didnt have time to help us...
quarxs said:
You need update EGL libs and kernel drvier for this libs.
Hwa should work automatically.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
from the (m)ATRIX...

I too have sent Hashcode a message asking for possible assistance. I told him we would be willing to donate to the cause.

If you can organise a decent fund/development device, I'd recommend contacting TripNRaVeR. He has experience porting the vanilla 3.1.10 Tegra kernel code to a new device (the One X, which shipped with 2.6.39) hence he's probably already halfway there with knowing where to go next. It looks like LG and Sammy have ditched DVFS in their 3.1.10 releases on the Galaxy R and O2X, which would be nice (using standard governors )

[Q] Which phones?

What phones currently being planned for OmniRom builds?

okcnyyfan said:
What phones currently being planned for OmniRom builds?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At the moment the nexus 4, 7, and 10 are officially supported. The oppo find 5, and Sony blue / mint are in the works. More will eventually be added
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk now Free

okcnyyfan said:
What phones currently being planned for OmniRom builds?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im also very interested as to which phones will be supported...but not only that but how easy will it be to get your device supported...im over in Asia and there aren't variants that aren't well supported by the major custom rom developers like AOKP, CM, Panandroid....which makes it really hard and sucks to get in on the "open source" goodness...i hope Omni is easy to bring to a large selection of phones...
EDIT: ok, well that makes sense the vanilla versions...just hope its easier to get more on board...

cezeff said:
im also very interested as to which phones will be supported...but not only that but how easy will it be to get your device supported...im over in Asia and there aren't variants that aren't well supported by the major custom rom developers like AOKP, CM, Panandroid....which makes it really hard and sucks to get in on the "open source" goodness...i hope Omni is easy to bring to a large selection of phones...
EDIT: ok, well that makes sense the vanilla versions...just hope its easier to get more on board...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Asian phones implying mediatek based? There are a few commits in Gerrit to add support for them, but I think it's still not usable. They'll do their best
As for not being supported. Unfortunately it's down to getting a device maintainer. There will be guides posted no doubt, and this is xda. Basically a massive manual on hacking android
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk now Free

cybojenix said:
Asian phones implying mediatek based? There are a few commits in Gerrit to add support for them, but I think it's still not usable. They'll do their best
As for not being supported. Unfortunately it's down to getting a device maintainer. There will be guides posted no doubt, and this is xda. Basically a massive manual on hacking android
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk now Free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any Sources ? and will it be Open source ?

percy_g2 said:
Any Sources ? and will it be Open source ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sources are being uploaded, and yes it will be open sourcd
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk now Free

cybojenix said:
Sources are being uploaded, and yes it will be open sourcd
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk now Free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool, hope the maintenance will nice and good luck

Was pretty stoked to see this announced at the BBQ; looking forward to builds, source, etc...

cybojenix said:
At the moment the nexus 4, 7, and 10 are officially supported. The oppo find 5, and Sony blue / mint are in the works. More will eventually be added
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk now Free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does the first batch include Nexus 7 2013?

ktkr said:
Does the first batch include Nexus 7 2013?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk now Free

Galaxy Nexus?

cybojenix said:
At the moment the nexus 4, 7, and 10 are officially supported. The oppo find 5, and Sony blue / mint are in the works. More will eventually be added
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk now Free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about the Xperia Z? I do love my Yuga. Hopefully it comes soon !

kimboinatl said:
Galaxy Nexus?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While it doesn't look like there is "official support" for it per se, I doubt it would be hard to get it building for it. Somebody will figure it out for sure.

cybojenix said:
Asian phones implying mediatek based? There are a few commits in Gerrit to add support for them, but I think it's still not usable. They'll do their best
As for not being supported. Unfortunately it's down to getting a device maintainer. There will be guides posted no doubt, and this is xda. Basically a massive manual on hacking android
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk now Free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm speaking of variants like the Japanese SGS4, Note 3 and so forth...
Sent from my SC-04E using Tapatalk

I'm hoping for jftlevzw supoort (vzw sgs4) but seeing these locked bootloaders and coming from a sprint evo 3d the vzw S4 dev looks pretty dead.

wil it be based on 4.3 or pervious versions?

Is galaxy nexus (maguro)not supported ?

cezeff said:
im also very interested as to which phones will be supported...but not only that but how easy will it be to get your device supported...im over in Asia and there aren't variants that aren't well supported by the major custom rom developers like AOKP, CM, Panandroid....which makes it really hard and sucks to get in on the "open source" goodness...i hope Omni is easy to bring to a large selection of phones...
EDIT: ok, well that makes sense the vanilla versions...just hope its easier to get more on board...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you can get AOSP to run on your device, you should be able to get Omni to run. Currently, a device tree needs nothing significant beyond an AOSP tree (I think about 3 lines of changes to make an AOSP tree work in Omni). This means work on porting Omni is helpful to those wanting AOSP as well.
cybojenix said:
Asian phones implying mediatek based? There are a few commits in Gerrit to add support for them, but I think it's still not usable. They'll do their best
As for not being supported. Unfortunately it's down to getting a device maintainer. There will be guides posted no doubt, and this is xda. Basically a massive manual on hacking android
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk now Free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mediatek chips will most likely end up supported. I understand that most projects eschew them through a lack of sources etc, but we intend to do what we can with them, as they offer interesting opportunities including multi-SIM support to say the least.
percy_g2 said:
Any Sources ? and will it be Open source ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I am just starting the source push right now.
kimboinatl said:
Galaxy Nexus?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it will be supported, we just didn't list it due to nobody having one to hand to test.
shaanyt said:
What about the Xperia Z? I do love my Yuga. Hopefully it comes soon !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, I understand it's been running on the Z
AngSanley said:
screenshots ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=46423859&postcount=2 for a couple right now
MWisBest said:
While it doesn't look like there is "official support" for it per se, I doubt it would be hard to get it building for it. Somebody will figure it out for sure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, it will be supported.
cezeff said:
I'm speaking of variants like the Japanese SGS4, Note 3 and so forth...
Sent from my SC-04E using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah OK. As I said, if you can get AOSP to run properly, then yes it will work.
Drake9897 said:
I'm hoping for jftlevzw supoort (vzw sgs4) but seeing these locked bootloaders and coming from a sprint evo 3d the vzw S4 dev looks pretty dead.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately the amount of carrier interference on many US phones makes them less fun for anyone wanting custom ROMs If you can get the SIM-free international model, that often helps, but that's obviously not possible with Verizon...
vinayakagarwal1996 said:
wil it be based on 4.3 or pervious versions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4.3.1
Ashutos1997 said:
Is galaxy nexus (maguro)not supported ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will be supported. Just not listed yet

Hats off to you guys, this is kind of a great progress you've done here. I was like wtf when I saw the project in the news in the morning. Already registered at your Gerrit and started syncing sources. I'm really excited to see this running on my P880. Hope you don't mind that I'm cheating. Will help you with this project as much as I can.
(@cybojenix: Probably this will be TNBT. )

Adam77Root said:
Hats off to you guys, this is kind of a great progress you've done here. I was like wtf when I saw the project in the news in the morning. Already registered at your Gerrit and started syncing sources. I'm really excited to see this running on my P880. Hope you don't mind that I'm cheating. Will help you with this project as much as I can.
(@cybojenix: Probably this will be TNBT. )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't mind at all. I am pushing it to Github to make it easier for you guys. I'll also need to fix the repo remotes (unless someone else gets there first) so it pulls from Github.

Extracted img from 'L' now what?

Hey all,
I extracted the img file from the dev preview of 'L' from the Hamerhead version.
I'm new at this and it's really cool to explore and see how these things are built. Can I just pull the framework from 4.4.4 and throw it into the img and flash that?
What would it take to be able to flash this? I'm sure I can't, but maybe someone could enlighten me on what goes into this as I'm really interested in learning.
Thanks in advance!

zbt1985 said:
Hey all,
I extracted the img file from the dev preview of 'L' from the Hamerhead version.
I'm new at this and it's really cool to explore and see how these things are built. Can I just pull the framework from 4.4.4 and throw it into the img and flash that?
What would it take to be able to flash this? I'm sure I can't, but maybe someone could enlighten me on what goes into this as I'm really interested in learning.
Thanks in advance!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, there are some guides for porting on XDA. However, since the Android L Source code isn't released yet, you cannot build it from source. So you would need to base it on a Kitkat rom. But since the radio, bootloader and apps from Android L require android L, you cannot just do that.
So a port would need to change drivers, frameworks and some other stuff I don't understand . However, some guys already started porting Android L to the Nexus 4, and , no offence, I think they are done much quicker as you (or me). So take a look: http://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-4/general/android-5-0-discussions-rumors-t2780976/post53701458

brick5492 said:
Well, there are some guides for porting on XDA. However, since the Android L Source code isn't released yet, you cannot build it from source. So you would need to base it on a Kitkat rom. But since the radio, bootloader and apps from Android L require android L, you cannot just do that.
So a port would need to change drivers, frameworks and some other stuff I don't understand . However, some guys already started porting Android L to the Nexus 4, and , no offence, I think they are done much quicker as you (or me). So take a look: http://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-4/general/android-5-0-discussions-rumors-t2780976/post53701458
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome! Thanks man I'll take a look!
I was just exploring, I know I probably couldn't do it, but it's fun to learn!
Thanks for not flaming!

zbt1985 said:
Awesome! Thanks man I'll take a look!
I was just exploring, I know I probably couldn't do it, but it's fun to learn!
Thanks for not flaming!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you thought you would get flamed huh? lol ?! Actually that speaks volumes.

Berrydroidcafe said:
So you thought you would get flamed huh? lol ?! Actually that speaks volumes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's a reason I don't really post/go on xda anymore. It's all a bunch of crying flamers who constantly ask for updates and complain when **** doesn't work.
That and the fact that I have a nexus so i'm not flashing roms every week lol

zbt1985 said:
There's a reason I don't really post/go on xda anymore. It's all a bunch of crying flamers who constantly ask for updates and complain when **** doesn't work.
That and the fact that I have a nexus so i'm not flashing roms every week lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm on here a lot more than usual. I'm between jobs now and at home. Will be changing next week though. One of my biggest pet peeves is those who won't take the time to research stuff before asking/demanding help. Answer is in the OP, but they don't bother to read it. Burns my hide as they say. ?

Berrydroidcafe said:
I'm on here a lot more than usual. I'm between jobs now and at home. Will be changing next week though. One of my biggest pet peeves is those who won't take the time to research stuff before asking/demanding help. Answer is in the OP, but they don't bother to read it. Burns my hide as they say. ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+100000000!!!!
Then you get called a douche for telling the person to read...
Sigh..
XDA isn't what it used to be. Just a bunch of spoiled kids.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

Android L preview for s/s plus

Would it be posible to port Android L preview to s/s plus? It's probably posible.
I wish someone tries to do that.

I vote for this, we need "Android L" on Galaxy i9000.

No its not possible i guess. We must wait for cm12
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Free mobile app

DJdarkster said:
No its not possible i guess. We must wait for cm12
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still not possible because of the space availiable in the device

chrisg4 said:
Still not possible because of the space availiable in the device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So the problem is only the available space ?

No and the hardware limitation because they cant handle the 3.10 kernel

chrisg4 said:
No and the hardware limitation because they cant handle the 3.10 kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess I need a new phone.

space?
space is not a problem, a slim cm12 rom like SlimCM could have enough free space, and moving all posible apps to SD would help to, and ART would be good for a second life to our phone.
But, about the hardware limitations, there is maybe some way to use the 3.4 drivers with 3.10 kernels? And, I ask, did the 3.4 kernel initially support our devices?

tonibm19 said:
space is not a problem, a slim cm12 rom like SlimCM could have enough free space, and moving all posible apps to SD would help to, and ART would be good for a second life to our phone.
But, about the hardware limitations, there is maybe some way to use the 3.4 drivers with 3.10 kernels? And, I ask, did the 3.4 kernel initially support our devices?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No this is not possible because 3.10 kernel has lot of changes...we can use only the android L if we are able to use 3.4 kernel but we will lose many features probably

chrisg4 said:
No this is not possible because 3.10 kernel has lot of changes...we can use only the android L if we are able to use 3.4 kernel but we will lose many features probably
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Android L beta uses 3.4 kernel and has almost all features of the final version. All apps of the final version will work in beta.

rdrai said:
Phone is flying like nitro after enabled ART
Thanks for making this possible
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's why android L makes sense, our phone could have a second life.
(Posting it here to not spam CM11 thread)

Don't worry, the CM12 is in production

scarmau said:
Don't worry, the CM12 is in production
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice
So no EOL in sight

scarmau said:
Don't worry, the CM12 is in production
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In production for the supported phones, not the S plus.
Or will you try to make it for S/S+?

lag
i thing android L i9000 will be lag

mdragon13 said:
i thing android L i9000 will be lag
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello, not me, not like KK android L is created for can to be use on low/old phones so we have a chance to use better L than K on our galaxy s
PS : sorry for my English I'm still learning.

mouchtik93 said:
Hello, not me, not like KK android L is created for can to be use on low/old phones so we have a chance to use better L than K on our galaxy s
PS : sorry for my English I'm still learning.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
KitKat was already developed for low end devices, as it only needs 512 MB RAM and has a low graphics mode. But Lollipop needs more process power for its animations and other new features. I know it's sad, but we all knew that this journey would come to an end one day.
But that's just my two cents, maybe someone will port L and it works good [emoji6]

käsebr0t said:
KitKat was already developed for low end devices, as it only needs 512 MB RAM and has a low graphics mode. But Lollipop needs more process power for its animations and other new features. I know it's sad, but we all knew that this journey would come to an end one day.
But that's just my two cents, maybe someone will port L and it works good [emoji6]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We've had a good run though. Our galaxy S has had some incredible support from A LOT of incredible devs. In fact were still getting new ROMs and updates now even after all the years our phones have been about. I don't think that L will run smoothly, but most likely we will see L hitting our phones, and maybe some dev will find a way of getting this to run well on our phones. Devs seem to love a challenge. It's thanks to such great devs that I'm still using my S1 as my daily driver after 4 years even after changing phones once, not liking the upgrade, and coming back.
A BIG THANK YOU TO ALL DEVS WHO HAVE GRACED OUR BELOVED S1.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2

RuffBuster said:
We've had a good run though. Our galaxy S has had some incredible support from A LOT of incredible devs. In fact were still getting new ROMs and updates now even after all the years our phones have been about. I don't think that L will run smoothly, but most likely we will see L hitting our phones, and maybe some dev will find a way of getting this to run well on our phones. Devs seem to love a challenge. It's thanks to such great devs that I'm still using my S1 as my daily driver after 4 years even after changing phones once, not liking the upgrade, and coming back.
A BIG THANK YOU TO ALL DEVS WHO HAVE GRACED OUR BELOVED S1.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can only say the same about the s+. If it hasn't been for our great developers, I would probably have selledy phone after less than a year. [emoji106]

Thanks
Thanks to all developers who have worked for our Galaxy S, and we hope to see even Android L .
There are news about it?