First look at the Droid Turbo - Verizon Motorola Droid Turbo General

http://www.androidpolice.com/2014/0...to-show-the-upcoming-droid-turbo-for-verizon/

BladeRunner said:
http://www.androidpolice.com/2014/0...to-show-the-upcoming-droid-turbo-for-verizon/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This years Droid is a beast, love the new curves!

I love the fact it has capacitive buttons, more useful screen size

I'm still curious about the Moto S. Code name shamu

I would love a Droid MINI Turbo

Sam_11 said:
I would love a Droid MINI Turbo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's called the Moto X

So, the Droid Turbo is like a rebadged Moto X (2014), i'm concerned about the Monster S, i mean, Moto S, that thing is a leviathan...

Does anyone else think that thing is butt-ugly?

joel_sinbad said:
So, the Droid Turbo is like a rebadged Moto X (2014), i'm concerned about the Monster S, i mean, Moto S, that thing is a leviathan...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not at all, it should be above the x2 as the Maxx was above the x. I hope in screen brightness still, as the x2 is no better than the x

aviwdoowks said:
Not at all, it should be above the x2 as the Maxx was above the x. I hope in screen brightness still, as the x2 is no better than the x
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Above in the sense of a bigger screen and battery

redddog said:
Does anyone else think that thing is butt-ugly?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You want Pretty get the x². Our beloved Maxx is sturdy. The new adds sleekness

redddog said:
Does anyone else think that thing is butt-ugly?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I think that Kevlar styling is looking really dated now. It's past time for Verizon to retire that, as well as the dumb Droid sounds and boot animation. None of these things will happen, probably.
The thing looks pretty thick, and I'm fine with that if it means that it's an even bigger battery than the Maxx.

I actually like the Kevlar look. Being ex-military and now in law enforcement, it has a special place in my heart. It also sets the phone apart from all the others out there.
If it's not a lot bigger than my G2, it's my next phone for sure.

I have been waiting for a phone to replace my DNA for a while. I hope it's 599.99 off contract to keep my unlimited intact. Looks like it'll blow the z3v out of the water.

doogald said:
Yes, I think that Kevlar styling is looking really dated now. It's past time for Verizon to retire that, as well as the dumb Droid sounds and boot animation. None of these things will happen, probably..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Appreciate what you have....I'm pretty sure this is going to be the new, long(er), more head scratching boot animation and "Droid" growl.
Seriously though you do have to appear like some sort of retard announcing yourself by name when no one asks....smh "Droooooid"

Doing a quick mock-up of the phone's dimensions using the provided pictures and assuming the screen size is 5.2", I came up with some pretty rough estimates for overall device size.
Droid Turbo dimensions
(inches) (mm)
5.59 | 142.1 -- Height
2.91 | 73.9 -- Width
For comparison:
Xperia Z3 Compact Dimensions
(inches) (mm)
5.01 | 127.3 -- Height
2.56 | 64.9 -- Width
Xperia Z3 Dimensions
5.75 | 146 -- Height
2.83 | 72 -- Width
Also... the resolution and dpi on this thing are just outright overkill! Yeesh. I'd be absolutely in heaven with this hardware cranking out a very respectable 1080p.

Topsnake said:
Above in the sense of a bigger screen and battery
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
uhh...
resolution?
CPU?
GPU?
Clock speed?
RAM?
Wireless charging?
Camera?
the Turbo is a hell of a lot more than a "bigger screen (thats actually the same size) and battery"

Metfanant said:
uhh...
resolution?
CPU?
GPU?
Clock speed?
RAM?
Wireless charging?
Camera?
the Turbo is a hell of a lot more than a "bigger screen (thats actually the same size) and battery"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That post was addressing the qouted post saying the original Droid maxx was above the Moto X #1. When read in context, you'll understand. The Maxx is indeed above the X #1 only in terms of battery and display size. Other than that, they are identical.

TheAugust said:
Doing a quick mock-up of the phone's dimensions using the provided pictures and assuming the screen size is 5.2", I came up with some pretty rough estimates for overall device size.
Droid Turbo dimensions
(inches) (mm)
5.59 | 142.1 -- Height
2.91 | 73.9 -- Width
For comparison:
Xperia Z3 Compact Dimensions
(inches) (mm)
5.01 | 127.3 -- Height
2.56 | 64.9 -- Width
Xperia Z3 Dimensions
5.75 | 146 -- Height
2.83 | 72 -- Width
Also... the resolution and dpi on this thing are just outright overkill! Yeesh. I'd be absolutely in heaven with this hardware cranking out a very respectable 1080p.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which is a few mm bigger (height and width) than the 2014 Moto X and a few mm smaller (height and width) than the LG G3.

Related

Droid 1 VS Droid X : First Impressions

I recently got a Droid X as an upgrade from the original Droid, and decided to compare the two:
Droid 1 Vs. Droid X
Hope this helps someone!
I personally think the Droid X is more solid than the Droid 1. In your review you said the Droid X is plastic!?!? It is metal buddy.
chris2k5 said:
I personally think the Droid X is more solid than the Droid 1. In your review you said the Droid X is plastic!?!? It is metal buddy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I said the Droid X feels more plastic when holding both phones.
I know both phones are solid and durable.
mcclanahoochie said:
I said the Droid X feels more plastic when holding both phones.
I know both phones are solid and durable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's probably because the Droid X is so much lighter.
Yes, handling solely the Droid X for a few days, it doesn't really feel plastic, but quite strong. I guess I was in the mindset that heavier is stronger, which [gladly] isn't always the case.
Also, Nixing MotoBlur for Launcher Pro Beta has drastically improved my experience with the Droid X - I do recommend!
Thanks for all the feedback.

Why I Love My Moto X

Why I love my Moto X even though I'm a spec lover.
1. Active Notifications - by far the best feature
2. Touchless Control - I'm using this more and more everyday.
3. Battery life
4. Small, compact and easy to hold.
5. X8 computing system. No lag whatsoever. Yes, smoother than my two other Snapdragon 600 phones.
6. Assembled in the US.
The phone is not perfect (camera, warm screen, 720 screen).
My other phones include S4 and LG Optimus Pro.
Sent from my XT1058 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I just bought the Moto Droid Maxx on Verizon. I've been using a GS4 and before that a Nexus 4.
I have to say, this phone is awesome. I'm loving active notifications, assist, and touchless control. They're changing the way that I use my phone.
martinezma99 said:
Why I love my Moto X even though I'm a spec lover.
1. Active Notifications - by far the best feature
2. Touchless Control - I'm using this more and more everyday.
3. Battery life
4. Small, compact and easy to hold.
5. X8 system. No lag whatsoever. Yes, smoother than my two other Snapdragon 600 phones.
6. Assembled in the US.
The phone is not perfect (camera, warm screen, 720 screen).
My other phones include S4 and LG Optimus Pro.
Sent from my XT1058 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a 4.7inch screen with an RGB matrix display with ppi above 300.. there is no way you would notice a difference compared to 1080p unless the screen technology itself is different. the resolution makes no difference and it just seems like such a petty thing to complain about. youre saving battery life. its the same way people who dont understand android think this phone sucks because its not quad core. lol.. you save battery and gain speed with the dualcore. its a lot more efficient. things like this will make it a hard phone to sell to the folks who like to brag about useless specs (aka the s3/s4 groupies)
warm screen can be adjusted with color multipliers and gamma settings
camera i really hope it sucks because of software like the first few batches of the htc one and not hardware related
The only time you can see a difference on the screen is when comparing Moto X to a 1080 screen side by side. The 720 screen is very good but not the best. I understand the decision behind the 720. As for it being warm, yes it can be changed but not out of the box like other phones (Samsung). For now, I'm stock with default settings.
I love the Moto X and highly recommend it.
Sent from my XT1058 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
DonDizzurp said:
a 4.7inch screen with an RGB matrix display with ppi above 300.. there is no way you would notice a difference compared to 1080p unless the screen technology itself is different. the resolution makes no difference and it just seems like such a petty thing to complain about. youre saving battery life. its the same way people who dont understand android think this phone sucks because its not quad core. lol.. you save battery and gain speed with the dualcore. its a lot more efficient. things like this will make it a hard phone to sell to the folks who like to brag about useless specs (aka the s3/s4 groupies)
warm screen can be adjusted with color multipliers and gamma settings
camera i really hope it sucks because of software like the first few batches of the htc one and not hardware related
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know people say that it's not noticeable. But it is. I have a Droid DNA 1080p. After using that, i can easily tell the difference. I even compared the same news article side by side. It's clearly more pleasurable to read on a 1080p screen than a 720p screen. That said, it could potentially be fixed with a font update as some of the font on the htc was thinner compared to the font on the moto x.
DonDizzurp said:
a 4.7inch screen with an RGB matrix display with ppi above 300.. there is no way you would notice a difference compared to 1080p unless the screen technology itself is different. the resolution makes no difference and it just seems like such a petty thing to complain about. youre saving battery life. its the same way people who dont understand android think this phone sucks because its not quad core. lol.. you save battery and gain speed with the dualcore. its a lot more efficient. things like this will make it a hard phone to sell to the folks who like to brag about useless specs (aka the s3/s4 groupies)
warm screen can be adjusted with color multipliers and gamma settings
camera i really hope it sucks because of software like the first few batches of the htc one and not hardware related
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need to use a 1080p screen cause the difference is definitely noticeable. Put the HTC one next to the moto x and get ready to be blown away.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
I used the Moto X in an AT&T store next to my One and honestly I did not have any complaints.
Too many people way overreact to things especially to screen resolution, 720p is still overkill in my opinion.
I Am Marino said:
I used the Moto X in an AT&T store next to my One and honestly I did not have any complaints.
Too many people way overreact to things especially to screen resolution, 720p is still overkill in my opinion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nobody is saying that the moto X has a bad screen or that 720p isn't good, it is. But a 1080p is better, plain and simple.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
barondebxl said:
Nobody is saying that the moto X has a bad screen or that 720p isn't good, it is. But a 1080p is better, plain and simple.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better technically, sure.
But a deal breaker, it shouldn't be, for the spec whores, this isn't your phone anyway.,
I Am Marino said:
Better technically, sure.
But a deal breaker, it shouldn't be, for the spec whores, this isn't your phone anyway.,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not a deal breaker at all. Some folks claim that you can't tell the difference between a 1080p vs 720p which is completely false.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
I Am Marino said:
Better technically, sure.
But a deal breaker, it shouldn't be, for the spec whores, this isn't your phone anyway.,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It has nothing do with spec whores. It has everything to do with please your eye sight. If I personally can see a difference between 720p and 1080p then yes, its going to bother me. If its correctable thought some font/sorcery then we got something.
And why wouldn't you want the most important item (the screen) to be satisfying. But to each to their own.
DammitCubs said:
And why wouldn't you want the most important item (the screen) to be satisfying. But to each to their own.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because at the end of the day, it's still a HD screen with a PPI over 300 which is the supposed maximum amount a normal eye can notice.
I don't buy most people who say "Well I can see the difference" Not to discredit those of you who really might be able to but most are dead lying and I'm sure of it.
But as you said, to each their own.
anaphora68 said:
I just bought the Moto Droid Maxx on Verizon. I've been using a GS4 and before that a Nexus 4.
I have to say, this phone is awesome. I'm loving active notifications, assist, and touchless control. They're changing the way that I use my phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd be really interested in hearing your thoughts on the Moto X vs the Moto Droid Maxx. From what I can gather, the Moto X has only three main benefits over the Maxx:
Moto maker customisation
Much better looking
A little bit cheaper
I'm not fussed about the customisation. It looking better and being a bit cheaper are nice but no way a deal breaker.
On the flip side, the Maxx as the following benefits:
Much bigger battery
Wireless charging
Larger screen (not that important for me)
In short, the benefits of the Moto X aren't that great for me. However, most of the benefits of the Maxx are massive bonuses for me.
With the main benefit of the Moto X being the customisation, I really don't know why people are choosing the Moto X over the Maxx especially with the following downsides to the customisation:
Not yet available
Will be carrier exclusive when it does start
Not all options will be available to start with (e.g. wood)
Some options will cost a premium (e.g. wood).
Moto Maxx just seems like the obvious choice.
Any thoughts or opinions?
Techno79 said:
Moto Maxx just seems like the obvious choice.
Any thoughts or opinions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think your points are valid. To me the design is the deciding factor. The Droid phones look ugly to me and will be greasy finger print magnets (case free living for me). As long as I get a full day of battery from the X then that is all I need.
bp_ said:
I think your points are valid. To me the design is the deciding factor. The Droid phones look ugly to me and will be greasy finger print magnets (case free living for me). As long as I get a full day of battery from the X then that is all I need.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. I'll grant the Maxx is not as big a fingerprint magnet as the Ultra, but I still find the Droid line to be boxy and butt ugly. Not something I'm interested in at all.
DammitCubs said:
I know people say that it's not noticeable. But it is. I have a Droid DNA 1080p. After using that, i can easily tell the difference. I even compared the same news article side by side. It's clearly more pleasurable to read on a 1080p screen than a 720p screen. That said, it could potentially be fixed with a font update as some of the font on the htc was thinner compared to the font on the moto x.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
barondebxl said:
You need to use a 1080p screen cause the difference is definitely noticeable. Put the HTC one next to the moto x and get ready to be blown away.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The HTC One uses an LCD screen. Like I mentioned in my post, 720 vs 1080 on such a small screen makes absolutely no difference if the technology is the same. If Motorola used the exact same screen technology but used a 1080 resolution instead, it would hardly be noticeable and by hardly I mean BARELY unless you're staring at the screen close up in a completely dark room.
DonDizzurp said:
The HTC One uses an LCD screen. Like I mentioned in my post, 720 vs 1080 on such a small screen makes absolutely no difference if the technology is the same. If Motorola used the exact same screen technology but used a 1080 resolution instead, it would hardly be noticeable and by hardly I mean BARELY unless you're staring at the screen close up in a completely dark room.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just compared it to a GS4. So that's Amoled vs Amoled.......yeah I can still tell. It's noticeable. I must have amazing eyes.
Pixel density is pixel density. And the magic number isn't 316 ppi, it's higher. Resolution is the same as a dead pixel, once you notice it's flaw. it's over.
I am looking right now at a Galaxy S3 306 PPI, and an HTC one .. ( Over 400 ), and whoever says the human eye can't distinguish the difference is downright blind, an idiot or has an agenda of some sort ..
Fatelord said:
I am looking right now at a Galaxy S3 306 PPI, and an HTC one .. ( Over 400 ), and whoever says the human eye can't distinguish the difference is downright blind, an idiot or has an agenda of some sort ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Two completely different screen technologies. You are always going to notice the difference between an Amoled and an LCD, regardless of PPI count. Funny, most people mention PPI as if they've been counting it all their lives. Screens are personal preferences, and people have different eyesights and color sensitivities, so there's no right answer. Just accept that and move on.
Fatelord said:
I am looking right now at a Galaxy S3 306 PPI, and an HTC one .. ( Over 400 ), and whoever says the human eye can't distinguish the difference is downright blind, an idiot or has an agenda of some sort ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They're just justifying things after the fact.
There is absolutely a difference. Granted, the X is better due to the lack of pentile, but I can still quite easily tell. It's not horrible in terms of pixel density, but the display isn't great by any other metric.

MOTO X +1?

http://9to5google.com/2014/04/06/moto-x-plus-one-coming-soon/
So color me intrigued! Anyone else wondering when and what the MOTO X +1 will entail?
AndreaCristiano said:
http://9to5google.com/2014/04/06/moto-x-plus-one-coming-soon/
So color me intrigued! Anyone else wondering when and what the MOTO X +1 will entail?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just hope they don't increase the screen size or dramatically alter the shape of it. If it has an identical body with nothing more than a spec bump I'll be THRILLED. 1080p amoled screen, faster processor, and 64gb storage but keep everything else the same and I will buy one the moment it drops. No need to mess with perfection.
_MetalHead_ said:
I just hope they don't increase the screen size or dramatically alter the shape of it. If it has an identical body with nothing more than a spec bump I'll be THRILLED. 1080p amoled screen, faster processor, and 64gb storage but keep everything else the same and I will buy one the moment it drops. No need to mess with perfection.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i agree with this exactly honestly i woulsdnt complain if there was a 5 inch screen but kept the same form factor... more stoked about the moto 360 then this though..
apparently it is going to come in a leather option. https://twitter.com/evleaks/status/452952150302527488
Im just waiting to hear if it's going to be the same size or not. If it's revealed that it will be a bigger phone than the X then I'll spend my money on the current X. I'd be happy if the next X kept the same size with just a camera upgrade. We'll see soon I hope.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using xda app-developers app
Holy leather macaroni! I need a black front white leather back with silver accents right now!:victory:
I swear I said it yesterday before it came out that it was gonna have a leather option! I also agree if the screen size grows i pray the form factor doesnt. I mean there is space now to remove that can increase the screen and minimilize bezels
If this new Moto X is enticing enough, I'm actually thinking about selling my Dev edition and upgrading. However, this new X will have to seriously wow me, in terms of looks, specs, and price. Has to be all 3 of those, not just 1 or 2.
alex94kumar said:
If this new Moto X is enticing enough, I'm actually thinking about selling my Dev edition and upgrading. However, this new X will have to seriously wow me, in terms of looks, specs, and price. Has to be all 3 of those, not just 1 or 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
one thing that the X "failed" at was competing in the "more is everything" spec war. which is entirely unfortunate given this is easily the best android device i've owned since the original DROID. with that said, i don't want Moto to give in to the spec war. previous articles have mentioned that whatever the X successor will be, it will be a "premium" model.
so far for the X+1, i've seen reports of a 6" screen, which is absolutely and completely a horrible idea. if they shrunk the bezel to "nothing" and kept the form factor, then fine, increase the screen. but the form factor is damn near perfect.
and honestly, i wouldn't care if they kept the most of the same internals, but more RAM, extra storage and wireless charging top my list as things that are a must with the new device. or if they're going to skip wireless charge, a bigger battery.
What to keep:
Active notifications
Touchless control
I don't mind the 720p resolution
Great better life (before 4.4.2)
What to add:
Wireless charging
4.8" to 5" screen but similar form factor.
Bigger battery
Better camera
Better picture/video gallery
Sent from my XT1058 using xda app-developers app
Jamolah said:
What to keep:
Active notifications
Touchless control
I don't mind the 720p resolution
Great better life (before 4.4.2)
What to add:
Wireless charging
4.8" to 5" screen but similar form factor.
Bigger battery
Better camera
Better picture/video gallery
Sent from my XT1058 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AKA Droid Maxx
Camera of course--13 mpix at least, but more importantly, some additional settings options, such as shutter speed. Better color balance too.
Go to 32 gB standard, with possible microSD support. Water/dust proofing also a plus; it's a functional feature that doesn't necessarily give in to the spec wars that the X eschewed in the first place.
Screen size increase? Meh. Right now I can work the phone with one hand/thumb. If it gets bigger, then not so much. If they can do something with bezel size and screen real estate with the current body size, then fine.
Screen resolution? If your eyes can't tell the difference, much greater resolution only draws more battery power. As does going quadcore--remember, Moto's own research supposedly showed that even their quadcore competitors' phones didn't use more than two cores at any time.
If they keep to close the current size, then battery capacity isn't likely to grow much, so retaining efficiency is paramount.
Nor do I care about front facing speakers, ala HTC. I don't listen to much music with phone speakers, and the quality is fine for interacting with the phone's TTV engine.
Finally, I am still a skeptic about wireless charging, if only because of the probability that it can heat the battery excessively, killing overall longevity.
Unlike wood, leather backs are not my thing--what's next, chinchilla?
I think the X+1 is not the 2014 X. Maybe it meants 4.7+1 = 5.7in phablet? maybe they have another name for the X?
If they don't change the name it may or may not just be 2014 moto x like the n7 but I doubt it.... Hopefully its not moto x+1 cause that's the stupidest name I've ever heard of
Sent from my Moto X using Tapatalk
cartmenicus said:
If they don't change the name it may or may not just be 2014 moto x like the n7 but I doubt it.... Hopefully its not moto x+1 cause that's the stupidest name I've ever heard of
Sent from my Moto X using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The leak picture actually sayS +X1. JPNo idea why everyone's stuck to +1
I would be persuaded to upgrade if they added:
Wireless charging
Bigger capacity battery
Better camera
Upgraded specs
Even more waterproofing
I'm hoping they don't change the size or form-factor as it's perfect for me. I don't really care about a leather back as I love the woven back.
Front facing speakers would be ideal; firing your audio away from you on the back of your phone is retarded for watching video.
tap'd on my Moto X
-iD said:
Front facing speakers would be ideal; firing your audio away from you on the back of your phone is retarded for watching video.
tap'd on my Moto X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
give me a SD card slot and I am golden.
x2h said:
give me a SD card slot and I am golden.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
honestly they are becoming extinct and the desire for them wont make that change manufactures want you to buy up for memory why would they want you to buy the cheapest model and allow you to upgrade the memory outside their pockets?
all i know is if they make the phone larger, i am going to have to look for a different phone or stay with this one till it dies. i have had the One, S4, Nexus 5 and pretty much any high end device in recent years and one of the main reason i love my X is due to its size.

Moto X 2015 Specs Leaked

http://www.redmondpie.com/motorola-moto-x-2015-specs-leaked-online/
Snapdragon 808
4GB RAM (bit OTT me thinks)
3280mah Battery (finally!!!)
5.2in QHD AMOLED Screen
16MP Rear Camera (with OIS I hope!)
5MP front camera
No micro SD slot (who cares in this day and age!)
32GB or 64GB storage options
I've got a feeling that huge battery isn't going to last much longer than the current gen Moto X due to that power hungry QHD screen
If that holds true, I'm on board. The only thing that would keep me from getting the Moto X 2015 is if Google decides to bring the next Nexus phone back down to a reasonable size. Even then, I may stick to the Moto X. My firm's AirWatch policy does not allow rooted phones or custom ROMs, so with that in mind, the Moto X pure edition comes out looking as good or better than a 5.2 inch screen Nexus.
Paddington said:
If that holds true, I'm on board. The only thing that would keep me from getting the Moto X 2015 is if Google decides to bring the next Nexus phone back down to a reasonable size.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here
Wutang200 said:
5.2in QHD AMOLED Screen
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
5.2 inch is the perfect size for me! I think QHD is a good choice but I can live w/o it.
Paddington said:
If that holds true, I'm on board. The only thing that would keep me from getting the Moto X 2015 is if Google decides to bring the next Nexus phone back down to a reasonable size. Even then, I may stick to the Moto X. My firm's AirWatch policy does not allow rooted phones or custom ROMs, so with that in mind, the Moto X pure edition comes out looking as good or better than a 5.2 inch screen Nexus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here, but for me QHD is unnecessary...
Enviado do meu XT1097
I have both the 2014 Moto X and the Moto Maxx. If they do go QHD in the Moto X hopefully they can source a better quality screen then the Maxx uses. It is QHD and offers nothing over the Moto X screen. Myself and friends have compared the screens side by side and the Moto X screen always wins.
The bigger the battery the better. I'd much prefer something closer to the Maxx battery which is 3900 mah. Would have liked wireless charging as well but this is unlikely if it has any kind of curved back.
leomagnani said:
Same here, but for me QHD is unnecessary...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. Frankly, my original Moto X screen has less banding and artifacts than my 2014. Sad to see manufacturers playing the pixel race.
Solutions Etcetera said:
Thanks. Frankly, my original Moto X screen has less banding and artifacts than my 2014. Sad to see manufacturers playing the pixel race.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought the original Moto X screen was terrible. I could not get rid of that phone fast enough. I could list about 5059383 complaints I had with that phone, but I'll stick to the screen. It looked like absolute crap compared to my Nexus 7 and my Nexus 5 (which I got the day it came out and immediately sold my Moto X). Going from my Nexus 7 screen to my Moto X screen was like going from an HD flat screen TV to a 1950s box-style TV. You can see the list of phones I've owned in my signature, plus I purchased a GS4 for my girlfriend and have some experience using it. I rank the Moto X 2013 at the very bottom of that list without question. On the flip side, I rank the Moto X 2014 #2 on the list, right behind the Nexus 5. That is adjusting for the time frame, of course--I would rather have a Moto X 2014 than a Nexus 5 today, but the Nexus 5 from Oct. 2013-2014 was better than the Moto X Sept. 2014-Sept. 2015.
I'd like to see 1.5 days of heavy use in terms of battery life or two days of moderate use. I'd also like the screen to stay at 5.2" The Nexus 6 is just too big for me.
Good - 5.2" screen size and larger battery. 808 instead of 810.
Bad - QHD screen, waste of battery and will increase cost. Will also cause lag as the 808 chipset tries to push that many pixels.
4GB RAM seems unlikely.
Just realized the SD808 comes with a slower adreno (418) than the SD805 (420). Crap.
I'm waiting on anandtech's review to see what the real difference is between the two GPUs. I'm hoping just a slightly lower clock speed.
Steve-x said:
Would have liked wireless charging as well but this is unlikely if it has any kind of curved back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Errrr, the secondary coil of the wireless charging system can be curved, no problem with that, the primary coil would still induces electricity on the secondary coil, curved or not.
QHD doesnt necessarily mean battery killer anymore.
With each successive generation Samsung has been systematically improving the power efficiency of their OLED displays. We measured a 20 percent improvement in display power efficiency between the Galaxy S5 and the Galaxy S6, which is especially impressive given that the Galaxy S6 has almost double the number of pixels and therefore much higher processing overhead
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.displaymate.com/Galaxy_S6_ShootOut_1.htm
They can be pretty efficient.
For you guys how much this phone will cost?
Sent from my Moto G 2014 using XDA Free mobile app
QHD is a technology that is being pushed to the consumers as just benefits. In the future, the cons will be minimized because we will have stringer SOC with minimal impact in this resolution, most energy efficient screens and better batteries. But it's feasible in the near future, not in this year...
I prefer a cheaper phone or a smoother and battery efficient phone now, not 600 ppi in my 5" display...
Enviado do meu XT1097
Between $674,98 and $687,25 off-contract.
Pyrazol said:
Between $674,98 and $687,25 off-contract.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those are some very specific price guesses!
Steve-x said:
Would have liked wireless charging as well but this is unlikely if it has any kind of curved back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But the N6 has wireless charging and a curved back?
---------- Post added at 08:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:52 PM ----------
Paddington said:
I thought the original Moto X screen was terrible. I could not get rid of that phone fast enough. I could list about 5059383 complaints I had with that phone,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I love my MX13 - great as a daily driver. Maybe you got a bad one?
---------- Post added at 08:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:14 PM ----------
eosman said:
I'd like to see 1.5 days of heavy use in terms of battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They would have to make the phone thick and heavy like the Droid Turbo/Maxx to get that kind of battery performance. I prefer the lighter, thinner Moto X to the Turbo/Maxx.
---------- Post added at 08:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:17 PM ----------
Potato. said:
For you guys how much this phone will cost?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No one knows yet, but if it is like the Moto X 2014, it will likely be $500 on launch for the base model and $50 more for the larger storage and $25 more for the premium backs. But now that Lenovo owns Motorola maybe not.
These so called leaks always make me laugh. I could have made up a spreadsheet of specs and it would look pretty similar to this. I think these sites makeup these leaks for clicks. My preference would be same screen size at 1080, 3000mAh battery and better camera processing sw.
Same screen better color calibration, same edge thinness but slightly thicker middle to fit a 2800-3000mah battery, camera obviously,
Sent from my SM-G920T using XDA Free mobile app

Moto X Play & Moto X Style Announced - Extremely Disappointed!!

http://www.redmondpie.com/moto-x-style-moto-x-play-announced-specs-release-date-price/
I think it's officially time for me to move onto something else after my Moto X 2nd Gen!
Here's what completely puts me off upgrading to the Moto X Play (Style is completely out of the question!!!):
-SIZE!!!
-Heavier
-Thicker
-No 802.11ac WiFi
-Almost same type of processor!
-No 4k video recording
-Same single speaker design instead of dual speakers
-No OIS (this should be standard by now for a 2015 flagship!!!)
Are any of you guys enticed by this crap?? Seems like selling their soul to the devil (Lenovo) has made them completely lose it!
Apparently the Moto X Style has an LCD display?????? I take it no Moto Display on this version then??
Extremely disappointed in Motorola but those of you that used to whinge about having a micro SD slot will be over the moon lol.
This is what is called a flounce?
Wutang200 said:
http://www.redmondpie.com/moto-x-style-moto-x-play-announced-specs-release-date-price/
I think it's officially time for me to move onto something else after my Moto X 2nd Gen!
Here's what completely puts me off upgrading to the Moto X Play (Style is completely out of the question!!!):
-SIZE!!!
-Heavier
-Thicker
-No 802.11ac WiFi
-Almost same type of processor!
-No 4k video recording
-Same single speaker design instead of dual speakers
-No OIS (this should be standard by now for a 2015 flagship!!!)
Are any of you guys enticed by this crap?? Seems like selling their soul to the devil (Lenovo) has made them completely lose it!
Apparently the Moto X Style has an LCD display?????? I take it no Moto Display on this version then??
Extremely disappointed in Motorola but those of you that used to whinge about having a micro SD slot will be over the moon lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm assuming you aren't in the US, since that phone won't even be available to us. I'll see what the next nexus phones are like, but chances are it will come down to the camera for me this time around
Sent from my XT1095 using Tapatalk
I was surprised that they didn't talk about software improvements... I was hoping Motorola would add more assist/voice features
But price is a huge positive....
I think I'll keep hold of my X 2014 for another year and go for the iPhone 7 next year.
I'll really miss Tasker and Moto Voice though
Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk
Yeah, I am totaly disappointed too. I will keep my moto x too and will now try to root it.
Moto Display in a LCD is a big challange.
The moto x is always not the flagship model of the motorola.
The Droid Turbo did!
But the next version of Droid has not even announced yet
Sent from my Moto G using XDA Free mobile app
The X Play version isn't their flagship anymore, it's like a higher-mid tier option. And considering its battery size at a price point that starts at $300 dollars, I'd say you're getting a pretty good deal. The 2014 X retailed at $500 in case you don't remember.
zack1175 said:
The moto x is always not the flagship model of the motorola.
The Droid Turbo did!
But the next version of Droid has not even announced yet
Sent from my Moto G using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I would have called the nexus 6 their flagship of 2014 instead of the turbo since the droid line was Verizon exclusive.
erikiksaz said:
The X Play version isn't their flagship anymore, it's like a higher-mid tier option. And considering its battery size at a price point that starts at $300 dollars, I'd say you're getting a pretty good deal. The 2014 X retailed at $500 in case you don't remember.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The X play is more like the step between the MOTO G and the MOTO X. It doesn't look like the nexus is returning to Motorola this year so the new MOTO X probably will be their flagship device. I mean 6 core processor, 21 megapixel camera, 5 megapixel front facing camera.
What could come out topping that on Motorola's end? Oh ya and 5.7 inch full resolution screen. As well as a micro SD slot returning. Did you guys read the specs? What more do you want out of a phone
slogar25 said:
What more do you want out of a phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Something that's as sleek as the Moto X 2014??
Something that's as thin and compact in my hand?
Metal back?
These things are huge and I believe this is gonna be their downfall.
I've been a massive Moto X fan since they first released the very first Moto X but I really can't stand the new models and am sad that I'll be forced to move to another device (most likely an iPhone).
Wutang200 said:
Something that's as sleek as the Moto X 2014??
Something that's as thin and compact in my hand?
Metal back?
These things are huge and I believe this is gonna be their downfall.
I've been a massive Moto X fan since they first released the very first Moto X but I really can't stand the new models and am sad that I'll be forced to move to another device (most likely an iPhone).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty sure the majority of users here will happily trade an extra millimeter of thickness to accommodate a bigger battery.
You'll be saying the same thing when the Moto X 2016 is announced lol. It seems to be getting bigger each year. I'm certain next year's model will hit 6 inches in screen size like the Nexus 6.
Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk
Very disappointed in the new Moto X Style announcement. 5.7" is way too big. 5.2" is my limit. Also the snapdragon 800 series 808 or 810 are very disappointing to me along with losing the Amoled display. I will be holding onto my 2014 Moto X until next year.
Sent from my XT1095 using Tapatalk
abrcrmdl23 said:
Very disappointed in the new Moto X Style announcement. 5.7" is way too big. 5.2" is my limit. Also the snapdragon 800 series 808 or 810 are very disappointing to me along with losing the Amoled display. I will be holding onto my 2014 Moto X until next year.
Sent from my XT1095 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I bought the new Moto G, because hell, it's $220, why not? And then will wait to see what the next Nexus is like. I agree, 5.7 is just too damn big.
Sounds like I'm one of the few who likes the new size. It's physically about the same size as the iPhone 6+ which fits in my pocket fine and the larger size is great for movies and games when coupled with the stereo speakers.
I also prefer the LCD to AMOLED. MotoDisplay is still going to be doable and with LCDs becoming more and more efficient it shouldn't have a huge impact on battery life.
abrcrmdl23 said:
Very disappointed in the new Moto X Style announcement. 5.7" is way too big. 5.2" is my limit. Also the snapdragon 800 series 808 or 810 are very disappointing to me along with losing the Amoled display. I will be holding onto my 2014 Moto X until next year.
Sent from my XT1095 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly my thoughts on it!
Moto X Play seems a downgrade to me in all aspects other than the battery department. I'll reserve my judgement on the 21MP camera until it's been properly tested.
Another phone I'm now considering is the Z4 Compact if it loses some fat.
Wutang200 said:
Something that's as sleek as the Moto X 2014??
Something that's as thin and compact in my hand?
Metal back?
These things are huge and I believe this is gonna be their downfall.
I've been a massive Moto X fan since they first released the very first Moto X but I really can't stand the new models and am sad that I'll be forced to move to another device (most likely an iPhone).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. I am hoping for the new Nexus 5 will be good...if not I might try to get a OP2. iPhone would be my last resort, but still an option.
zack1175 said:
The moto x is always not the flagship model of the motorola.
The Droid Turbo did!
But the next version of Droid has not even announced yet
Sent from my Moto G using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How is a one carrier phone the flagship? The Moto X is, has been and will be the flagship.
I don't mind the new size. As I get older a bigger screen is good for my eyes, lol. I did say I'd pick my next phone on getting at least a half way decent camera so that will determine it for me. I was also thinking having expandable storage would be important for my purposes so it's nice that Motorola is kind of bucking that trend.
It'll be interesting to see what Google come up with.
Sent from my XT1095 using XDA Free mobile app
slogar25 said:
What more do you want out of a phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ikr. The Moto X Pure is going to be fantastic! I can't wait to get it and unlock its bootloader!!!!
I think I will go with a black front, white back and champagne accents. So pretty!
---------- Post added at 08:32 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:40 AM ----------
Chekp38 said:
As I get older a bigger screen is good for my eyes, lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So true! I use my phone as much as a mobile computing device as a phone so a big screen is good for me too. I can see how guys who want to carry the phone in their pocket don't like larger phones and if you can read those smaller screens great but I can't.

Categories

Resources