Related
Samsung Galaxy S II Tegra (Galaxy Royal) i9103
Available in Europe from at least 104 Online shops:
http://skinflint.co.uk/eu/670691
Telecoms are selling the "i9103 Samsung Galaxy S II Tegra" for 300 US$ less then the i9100 Samsung Galaxy S II. So many customers buy the i9103.
Some of the custom telecom versions out there:
Hutchinson 3 Samsung Galaxy R i9103
O2 Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Vodafone Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Mobilcom Debitel Samsung Galaxy R i9103
T-Mobile/Telekom Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Telco Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Base Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Talkline Samsung Galaxy R i9103
E-Plus Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Hope we soon get our own forum or we will have to use the i9100 forum.
Click picture to enlarge:
tegra now?...why so late???omg...
Its already available in India since a month. Its more like a Dual Core version of Galaxy S rather than S2. It has almost same features of Galaxy S except for dual core. 5 MP cam, 512 Mb Ram, 4.1 inch SLCD screen etc.
http://www.flipkart.com/mobiles/sam...qw--&ref=16a7bad0-7777-4e16-b755-cc8f2840eccc
it has 1GB RAM 4.19" and SLCD and flash LED.
I don't think this counts as a Galaxy S II, or even a Galaxy S device...
The closer aproach would be like an S2 SCL. S is i9000 and S SCL I9003, this is I9103 and S2 is the original I9100, so more or less like S2 SCL.
But it's Galaxy R (with different hw)...not Galaxy S2...though the code is I9103...very strange...
I have a Galaxy R (i9103) and a Galaxy S (i9000).
Galaxy R is a nice phone. Very very fast and good looking. I think it is very similar to the S2 (i9100) because it looks like it has the same crap implementation of the Yahama DAC. Galaxy S sounds waaay better with Voodoo Sound and I am still using it as my personal phone.
If the only difference is the CPU+GPU part, S2 ROMs may be kind of "compatible". Changing the kernel and other details could be the only needed actions to get some proper ROMs for this phone.
Endoran said:
I don't think this counts as a Galaxy S II, or even a Galaxy S device...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
S II Tegra is one of its names. And it is faster then SII:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=19879762
legion1911 said:
S II Tegra is one of its names. And it is faster then SII:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=19879762
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol? Mali plus exynos is a way more faster than tegra crap.
Sent from HydrOG3N MOD S2.
Technology Evolves, Android Evolves.
HydrOG3N is THE Revolution.
Tegra 2 is Android reference design for Android tablets. So it is not crap.
The Galaxy Tab 10.1 is also Tegra 2.
The Galaxy R does everything a Galaxy Tab 10.1 does, but it fits into the pocket of your Jeans.
"The Samsung Galaxy R I9103 is an Android smartphone that was announced by Samsung on August 10, 2011 as a variant to the Samsung Galaxy S II."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_R
"The Samsung Galaxy R is one of the currently available variants of the Galaxy S II."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S_II
legion1911 said:
S II Tegra is one of its names. And it is faster then SII:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=19879762
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol its very well documented that Mali is (a lot) faster than tegra II...
please don't start this again and do your researches before posting random benchmarks trying to prove something that's not true...
If benchmark scores were to be taken seriously, I can have higher scores than yours without overclocking my phone as you did to get those scores...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
The back of the phone looks better than our Exynos models... we still blow every phone out of the water though in terms of performance .
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Teio said:
Lol its very well documented that Mali is (a lot) faster than tegra II...
please don't start this again and do your researches before posting random benchmarks trying to prove something that's not true...
If benchmark scores were to be taken seriously, I can have higher scores than yours without overclocking my phone as you did to get those scores...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
King Shady said:
The back of the phone looks better than our Exynos models... we still blow every phone out of the water though in terms of performance .
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a lot (by hair)
Blow (blow job)
truth to be told it's not worthy upgrade to original SGS wahahahahahaha
you'r just trying to justify great amount of cash spent
you too
thought i was the only one with an s2 and still using my galaxy s as my daily phone.. for same reason. crap sound chip, also slow gps lock times.
josjator said:
I have a Galaxy R (i9103) and a Galaxy S (i9000).
Galaxy R is a nice phone. Very very fast and good looking. I think it is very similar to the S2 (i9100) because it looks like it has the same crap implementation of the Yahama DAC. Galaxy S sounds waaay better with Voodoo Sound and I am still using it as my personal phone.
If the only difference is the CPU+GPU part, S2 ROMs may be kind of "compatible". Changing the kernel and other details could be the only needed actions to get some proper ROMs for this phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whats faster S2 tegra or exynos? I haven could to test the tegra ...
-Nane- said:
whats faster S2 tegra or exynos? I haven could to test the tegra ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Search?
Sent from my GT-I9100
Can someone check the DAC on this phone? Also, does it support USB OTG and MHL?
samsung galxy r i9103 usb on the go!!!
can u tell me if this device supports usb on the go just lyk its big brother s2?????????
Teio said:
If benchmark scores were to be taken seriously, I can have higher scores than yours without overclocking my phone as you did to get those scores...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On custom roms for sure Come on, why should you overclock if you have originally faster cpu (1,2 vs 1,0) ?
I tested both handsets (stock roms) and results of quadrant, smartbench, cf... were almost the same, little higher in favor of sgs2 (1,2 ghz ex compared to tegra's 1 ghz). Clocked to 1.2 ghz tegra had slightly better scores in every test.
No need to argue about that, I know what experts say about exynos' and tegra's performance. The thing is that for average user is really hard to notice which of those two handsets is snappier.
which is better ((galaxy S)) OR ((S plus)) OR ((SL)) ??
fathyazhary said:
which is better ((galaxy S)) OR ((S plus)) OR ((SL)) ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want good community support and planty of xda activity Galaxy S is unbeatable.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
I9000 of course
I9001 > I9000 > I9003
Personally like I9000.....
If you are into Modding and flashing, then go for S. If you want performance go with S+. If you want the phone to cost less ,choose SL.
Sent from my Galaxy S running MIUI ICS!
The original Samsung Galaxy S i9000.
i9000 (PowerVR SGX540) > i9001 (Adreno 205) > i9003 (PowerVR SGX530).
Galaxy s. As said, better community, more stuff and custom roms
SGS i9001 (the quallcomm one) is supposed to be faster - i think i 've read somewhere that it's based on a single fast memory chip and don't have i9000's lag problem. i9003 is the worse than both.
Why don't u even consider the galaxy r in ur list ???
From the choices given, i9000 is still MUCH better than the Plus and SL version.
Just exclude the SL from that list because its ... frankly ... Teh ****zz from company. A lame attempt to sell the name "Galaxy" i.e. Their Flagship Device.
Galaxy S Plus has a faster CPU. It'll be a better performer in day to day tasks than i9000.
However, i9000 is still has a better hardware OVERALL. Becaues it also has a better GPU i.e. SGX540. While rest of the specs are same as Plus version.
Conclusion: From the above given choices, choose the i9000.
BUT ... If you can consider other options say Galaxy R, look into it as well. (If you can live without a SuperAMOLED display ... well, i cant )
i9001 is better, but no one making roms for it.
no
no..i9000 is way better than i9001
inozako said:
no..i9000 is way better than i9001
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you just compare hardware i9001 is of course better, but the Android community of i9000 is awesome, so it is just a matter of taste
yaya, this is what i meant, cause there are more custom roms out there..
Galaxy S in terms of support of course
specs-wise= sgs+
short on $$$= sgsl
dev support=sgs
you choose.
aakaashjois said:
If you are into Modding and flashing, then go for S. If you want performance go with S+. If you want the phone to cost less ,choose SL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly what I wanted to write I still prefer I9000 S cause it was my first phone but the S+ is a beast
I9003 is highest but I love my I9000!
S and S+ rocks
I personally have a Galaxy S , with its CPU at 1.3Ghz , more or less equalling CPU performance with the S Plus.
They would have done better if they had given the S+ with 1.4Ghz CPU + PowerVR SGX540 , that would really be killer. When I bought my S , it was priced at 22k INR and the SL was 18k . The SL was much laggier in general operation, but thats debatable cause the S was using 2.3.3 , whereas the SL was 2.2.1 . I saw the S+ too , 24k , was more or less same in performance with the S.
I went with the S due to much higher GPU performance, with value pack XXJW4 , Semaphore 2.7.4sc , 1.3GHz CPU i get 33.2fps in Nenamark2 , with 1Ghz , i get 32.8fps
I9000 as it has more support
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Which one is better? Does the Grand Duos have a Gpu? How does its dual core processor compare to quad core of Quattro?
Main requirement is dual SIM with good display and battery life and also able to play some games such as Subway Surfers. I am tilted towards Grand Duos because of better camera.
Sent from Samsung Note 2 N7100 using Tapatalk 2
I have galaxy grand and my friend has the quattro
I never regretted buying the grand
when using the quattro I Don't feel the extra bump of the processor and the games lag because of the quattro's basic gpu adreno 203
on the contrary the same game with the same apk never lag in grand even in power saving mode because of the better gpu of grand videocore IV
plus the extra screen real estate and better camera an 1080 play and recording of grand are all plus points for me
quattro is a joke really compared to grand in real life performance don't be fooled by benchmarking
and quattro practically has no development going for it that means no mods no custom roms and be grateful if it even has a rooting method "really bad for me"
that's my opinion and the decision is for you
Go for Grand if possible. Trust me, Galaxy Grand smoke away Galaxy Win miles away. Although Grand are using 1.2GHz A9 core + Video Core IV, are way better than Win Quad-Core 1.2 A5 core + Adreno 203.
Subway Surfers problem can be solved (If you having it) by upgrading your firmware. OTA or ODIN.
Grand is better than quattaro in terms of specs, screen, camera:good::good::good:
Grand is better in every aspect
Camera
Display
Gpu
Cpu
Official 4.2.2 update by Samsung
Bigger battery
Etc etc
sent from Samsung Galaxy Grand
Galaxy win is a good idea if you have your budget limited.
Quattro has high benchmark still poor performance don't know why... my brother has that phone...
I have grand. He wants to exchange with me. Lol.. now you decide...
To err is human; to forgive is divine
I think that Galaxy GranD Is Better than Win Duos ... win duos have an older processor ...
Hi everyone
plz suggest me best value for money smartphone under Rs8000 and also good in android development
i really like sgy but because of broadcom we cant enjoy awesome roms and all
so plz suggest me some good smatphone
Siya.Mishra said:
Hi everyone
plz suggest me best value for money smartphone under Rs8000 and also good in android development
i really like sgy but because of broadcom we cant enjoy awesome roms and all
so plz suggest me some good smatphone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can buy Karbonn Titanium S1, Xolo q800, q700
Sent from my Micromax A117 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Tech Knowns said:
You can buy Karbonn Titanium S1, Xolo q800, q700
Sent from my Micromax A117 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are these mentioned brands sold in Malaysia?
Sent from my GT-S5300 using Tapatalk 2
What I would suggest is :-
Samsung Galaxy S Duos S7562
Pros:
The overall phone as a good finish.
Display is great
Camera is quite decent.
Cons:
No scope for future Android updates
Samsung Galaxy Young S6310
Pros:
Android 4.4 update will be available in future.
768MB Ram
Cons:
Poor Display
Camera not so good
Micromax Canvas 2
Pros:
Dual Core Processor
Colours are great
Overall Development for this phone is quite decent
Cons:
Low Ram i.e.. 512MB
No scope for future updates
If opting for Windows Phone
Nokia Lumia 520
Pros:
Display is better than the phones mentioned above
Dual Core Krait processor
Camera is really good
Amber update is available for this phone
Cons:
No development
Little flimsy
No scope for future updates
What I would suggest is you to save more money , enough for you to buy atleast Sony Xperia M or Micromax Canvas HD
I don"t like any suggestion if need pm me
Shadman0 If I help U Pls Give Thanks
My Work http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2521867
Gamer R said:
What I would suggest is :-
Samsung Galaxy S Duos S7562
Pros:
The overall phone as a good finish.
Display is great
Camera is quite decent.
Cons:
No scope for future Android updates
Samsung Galaxy Young S6310
Pros:
Android 4.4 update will be available in future.
768MB Ram
Cons:
Poor Display
Camera not so good
Micromax Canvas 2
Pros:
Dual Core Processor
Colours are great
Overall Development for this phone is quite decent
Cons:
Low Ram i.e.. 512MB
No scope for future updates
If opting for Windows Phone
Nokia Lumia 520
Pros:
Display is better than the phones mentioned above
Dual Core Krait processor
Camera is really good
Amber update is available for this phone
Cons:
No development
Little flimsy
No scope for future updates
What I would suggest is you to save more money , enough for you to buy atleast Sony Xperia M or Micromax Canvas HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my brother having galaxy s duos and it lag like hell
Siya.Mishra said:
my brother having galaxy s duos and it lag like hell
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well the budget that you have in your hand ain't good. As in, if you want a device that is future proof , then you've got to extend the budget. That is why I had suggested that you should start saving enough for atleast a Xperia M which is powered by Qualcomm Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus with Adreno 305 and has 1GB of Ram. Performance wise , it is quite good and it'll not burn a hole is your pocket. Alternatively you could buy one of the Micromax or Xolo phone , but the thing is that their after sales services are really bad. I'm sure that your Galaxy Y might be in good condition. Use it for while until you save enough.
If you find my advice helpful , press the THANKS button
luqman98 said:
Are these mentioned brands sold in Malaysia?
Sent from my GT-S5300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know about Xolo but Karbonn is sold in India. (Also Micromax)
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda-app
Using CWM........Busybox Commands........No I use my hands
Well if u want a phone for development u can go for 2nd hand nexus $210 which is already unlocked for tweaking.
Sent from A2 running
System 1 : Jb leak 4.1.2
System 2 : Useless (Almost)
System 3 : Slimbean
System 4 : Slimkat (latest)
If you can increase budget, I would suggest only Nexus. Better than OEM locked phones.
Flash thanks via CWM if helped.(Don't forget to mount system)
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda-app
Using CWM........Busybox Commands........No I use my hands
Xolo, karbonn, aqua, panasonic, micromax hav great phones at price range around 8000
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Samsung Galaxy Young S6310 is very best.
Xolo q800 fits perfectly for ur budget
Press the thanks button
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
hi every one just wanna know how run eal racing 3 on your galaxy tab 3 10.1?
I test this game on my tab but frame rate is low and laggy
First of all , this thread must be posted in the Tab 3 Q&Ans forum . And for the answer to your question - there should be no lag on tab 3 bcoz my tab can support as big games as gangstar vegas and modern combat 4 without no lag at all . Download greenify , and hibernate all the apps , and open build.prop and edit phone model to GT-I9505 . There will be.no lag at all . Trust me .
Don't forget to press thanks If I helped you in anyway .
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
thank you , right modern combat 4 or asphalt 8 run smoothly, only problem whit real racing 3
I dont knkw maybe this game not optimized for intel cpu
augure_king said:
thank you , right modern combat 4 or asphalt 8 run smoothly, only problem whit real racing 3
I dont knkw maybe this game not optimized for intel cpu
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah u r right . It is not customized for intel cpu . If tab 3 would have a cortex cpu or qualcomm cpu , everything would have been awesome . Development of roms and kernels would also have been very easy . Though now , I hope that kitkat will arrive soon for our tab and every issue will be resolved . And remember the rule of xda , instead of making a thanks post , we must press the thanks button .
Don't forget to press thanks If I helped you in anyway .
Sent from my GT-P5210 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Tab 3 10.1 has a low amount of RAM. Tab 3 8.0 performs much better because it has 0.5GB more RAM.
Riir said:
Tab 3 10.1 has a low amount of RAM. Tab 3 8.0 performs much better because it has 0.5GB more RAM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's not about ram because samsung use swap ram in tab 3 10.1 300swap+1000 =1300 so problem here just optimizing you can play modern combat 4 whit full graphic without any problem or n.o.v.a 3 or asphalt 8 because gameloft optimized thair's games for intel cpu
but even games that need low spec some time laggy on this device
Deleted
Invalid Argument !
Riir said:
Tab 3 10.1 has a low amount of RAM. Tab 3 8.0 performs much better because it has 0.5GB more RAM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your argument is INVALID, sir
Tab 3 8.0 have 1,5GB RAM = True
Tab 3 10.1 have 1GB RAM = True
Tab 3 8.0 perform better than Tab 3 10.1 = False (sorry)
A 32Bit CPU is faster even than Exynos 4412 aka Exynos Quad
The BIGGEST problem is the bad optimization of apps for the Intel Proccessor, that's why the Tab 3 10.1 lags in many games where Tab 3 8.0 don't lag at all because of its Quad Core GPU i.e Mali-400PM4
I have been a Tab 3 10.1 user, and honestly it's just a GREAT tab. Didn't regret anything about it.
Sent from my room mate's computer
Aeyan Ashraf said:
Yeah u r right . It is not customized for intel cpu . If tab 3 would have a cortex cpu or qualcomm cpu , everything would have been awesome . Development of roms and kernels would also have been very easy . Though now , I hope that kitkat will arrive soon for our tab and every issue will be resolved . And remember the rule of xda , instead of making a thanks post , we must press the thanks button .
Don't forget to press thanks If I helped you in anyway .
Sent from my GT-P5210 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if u dont have an x86 cpu.... u can have fake a cortex or qualcomm or tegra gpu
using gltools
i have posted tutorial for gltools in general section