Related
Hey guys,
I finally built omni 4.4 for Gtab2 10.1
My wifi is turned On, but can't find any network.
I used latest blobs from samsung stock rom 4.2.2 to be sure.
logcat:
http://pastebin.com/xm6un9Tg
During the build process i faced an error :
Code:
out/target/common/obj/APPS/framework-res_intermediates/src/com/android/internal/R.java
out/target/common/obj/APPS/framework-res_intermediates/src/android/R.java
expected "}"
public static final class string-array{ }
^
this is not the exact error code but it was almost this.
To bypass this error i just comented both class, i wonder if this can be related?
thanks
I'd suggest looking at other device bringup commits first.
4.4 requires wifi configuration changes and storage configuration changes.
Entropy512 said:
I'd suggest looking at other device bringup commits first.
4.4 requires wifi configuration changes and storage configuration changes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mmhh still no luck.
I don't have any error message in logcat now but still scanning for network and can't find any.
I based my change on aries bring up commit.
Now my ext sdcard work if i'm root, i may need to change some permission in fstab,
and i add edit this line in init.espresso10.rc
Code:
service wpa_supplicant /system/bin/wpa_supplicant \
-Dnl80211 -iwlan0 -e/data/misc/wifi/entropy.bin [email protected]:wpa_wlan0 \
-c/data/misc/wifi/wpa_supplicant.conf -O/data/misc/wifi/sockets
and if I try to add an ssid by hand i got this error in logcat:
Code:
E/WifiConfigStore( 441): failed to set SSID: "mywifi"
E/WifiConfigStore( 441): Failed to set a network variable, removed network: 0
E/WifiStateMachine( 441): Failed to save network
thanks.
Did you add it, or change the one that was already there?
Entropy512 said:
Did you add it, or change the one that was already there?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I add it to try, there is no wifi network, it loop on "searching network"
I wonder if my error can be related to what i said earlier
sevenup30 said:
During the build process i faced an error :
Code:
out/target/common/obj/APPS/framework-res_intermediates/src/com/android/internal/R.java
out/target/common/obj/APPS/framework-res_intermediates/src/android/R.java
expected "{"
public static final class string-array{ }
^
this is not the exact error code but it was almost this.
To bypass this error i just comented both class, i wonder if this can be related?
thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you face this error while building omni? can it be because of my java version? i'm on java 6
finally got it working, it was related in init conf file like you said.
Does someone just know how can I disable hardwar keyboard at first boot?
Because of that keyboard never show up so i have to skip the first settings and disable it in language & input.
sevenup30 said:
finally got it working, it was related in init conf file like you said.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you precise which mod you did in init conf file ?
Because I've the same problem with a build for Acer A200 : loop on AP scan, no results, no possibilities to configure an AP manually....
Thanks
sevenup30 said:
finally got it working, it was related in init conf file like you said.
Does someone just know how can I disable hardwar keyboard at first boot?
Because of that keyboard never show up so i have to skip the first settings and disable it in language & input.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fix or remove the broken kernel driver that's reporting a keyboard as being present when it's not.
Another possibility is you're missing KL/IDC files for some input device that is being treated as a hardware keyboard when it's not. (See the galaxys2-common family - the sii9234 or whatever it is IDC file was needed to keep that input device from being detected as a HW keyboard)
Hi,
In the past I've built CM for various devices/versions. Moving to omni, I'd like to build for my jfltexx, but it fails during some of the static library builds:
I thought it might be jfltexx specific, but mako dies in a similar way:
Code:
host C: libcorkscrew <= system/core/libcorkscrew/arch-x86/ptrace-x86.c
host SharedLib: libgccdemangle (/home/darrens/android/omni/out/host/linux-x86/obj/lib/libgccdemangle.so)
/home/darrens/android/omni/out/host/linux-x86/obj/SHARED_LIBRARIES/libgccdemangle_intermediates/cp-demangle.o: file not recognized: File truncated
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [/home/darrens/android/omni/out/host/linux-x86/obj/lib/libgccdemangle.so] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
I have a clean tree for CM11 - it is looking like mako will succeed (the .o files that are empty above are present in the CM build) CM11 jfltexx fails, but in a different way to omni.
EDIT: Just produced cm-11-20131212-UNOFFICIAL-mako.zip, but still no luck.
BTW - love the approach omni is taking. As a long time user of Fedora, I can see parallels in the engagement model. The community will be able to engage in a more stuctured way (discussing bugs randomly on XDA is a poor way to manage issues in unreleased software), and I suspect it will be easier for people to stand up and submit fixes, or even report bugs. Good job.
Ah - might be my bad. Had my machine freeze at some stage after/during repo sync - might have corrupted something that wasn't detected by re-sync. removed the source for this lib, and re synced - it's built the object files now, but failed on a few others. Might blow away the whole lot and start clean (is there a way to check integrity of files in the repo?)
dazbys said:
Ah - might be my bad. Had my machine freeze at some stage after/during repo sync - might have corrupted something that wasn't detected by re-sync. removed the source for this lib, and re synced - it's built the object files now, but failed on a few others. Might blow away the whole lot and start clean (is there a way to check integrity of files in the repo?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nuke your working folder and do a sync from scratch using this method: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=47625075&postcount=666
It'll sync in no time at all because you already have CM11.0 sauce™ code.
Success
chasmodo said:
Nuke your working folder and do a sync from scratch using this method: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=47625075&postcount=666
It'll sync in no time at all because you already have CM11.0 sauce™ code.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep - some corrupted stuff in my repo - all synced and build OK.
Do you know if I need to extract the proprietary files for the final product to run properly? I ran extract-files.sh, and it failed to find some (using my existing omni 4.4.2 device as the source).
dazbys said:
Yep - some corrupted stuff in my repo - all synced and build OK.
Do you know if I need to extract the proprietary files for the final product to run properly? I ran extract-files.sh, and it failed to find some (using my existing omni 4.4.2 device as the source).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know for sure for your device, but I compile builds for n7000 and n7100 using DonCoyote/Samsung blobs, not extracted stuff.
chasmodo said:
I don't know for sure for your device, but I compile builds for n7000 and n7100 using DonCoyote/Samsung blobs, not extracted stuff.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK. I've seen a ref to that, and theMuppets. I guess without the blobs, big chunks of the device won't work. I'll just have to try it out I guess (then perhaps I can assist with the build_jfltexx page on the wiki). I'll add that to my config, as per the i9300 instructions .
dazbys said:
OK. I've seen a ref to that, and theMuppets. I guess without the blobs, big chunks of the device won't work. I'll just have to try it out I guess (then perhaps I can assist with the build_jfltexx page on the wiki). I'll add that to my config, as per the i9300 instructions .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm trying to build for a jfltexx, but I'm stuck here:
Code:
make: *** Nessuna regola per generare l'obiettivo "/home/francesco/android/omni/out/target/product/jfltexx/obj/lib/libtime_genoff.so", necessario per "/home/francesco/android/omni/out/target/product/jfltexx/obj/SHARED_LIBRARIES/libandroid_runtime_intermediates/LINKED/libandroid_runtime.so". Arresto.
make: *** Attesa per i processi non terminati....
external/sqlite/dist/sqlite3.c: In function 'pcache1Fetch':
external/sqlite/dist/sqlite3.c:37669:25: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Wempty-body]
external/sqlite/dist/sqlite3.c:37671:25: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Wempty-body]
external/sqlite/dist/sqlite3.c: In function 'fts3SnippetFunc':
external/sqlite/dist/sqlite3.c:129896:11: warning: 'iS' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
external/sqlite/dist/sqlite3.c:129888:13: note: 'iS' was declared here
Can you please tell me what steps are after Setting Up A Compile Environment?
Thanks
TheMorpheus said:
I'm trying to build for a jfltexx, but I'm stuck here:
Code:
make: *** Nessuna regola per generare l'obiettivo "/home/francesco/android/omni/out/target/product/jfltexx/obj/lib/libtime_genoff.so", necessario per "/home/francesco/android/omni/out/target/product/jfltexx/obj/SHARED_LIBRARIES/libandroid_runtime_intermediates/LINKED/libandroid_runtime.so". Arresto.
make: *** Attesa per i processi non terminati....
external/sqlite/dist/sqlite3.c: In function 'pcache1Fetch':
external/sqlite/dist/sqlite3.c:37669:25: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Wempty-body]
external/sqlite/dist/sqlite3.c:37671:25: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Wempty-body]
external/sqlite/dist/sqlite3.c: In function 'fts3SnippetFunc':
external/sqlite/dist/sqlite3.c:129896:11: warning: 'iS' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
external/sqlite/dist/sqlite3.c:129888:13: note: 'iS' was declared here
Can you please tell me what steps are after Setting Up A Compile Environment?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flash latest nightly and do ./device/samsung/jfltexx/extract-files.sh
Hello I am trying to port the beloved OmniRom to my device which is a KLTE (Samsung Galaxy S5) I have successfully built the ROM from source using kernel and device configs from CM and of course some fixes and cherry picking. The issue I have now is that the ROM will not boot.
I stays at my carrier logo (Samsung) so it does not even let me cat-log. I tried to install the ROM and then restored a backup of Cyanogenmods system directory. It boots to android but all apps forceclose. I did this to see if it was an issue with the boot image and since it can boot to a different system partition I don't believe its a boot.img issue or kernel issue for that matter. Or is it?
Any help getting this to boot would be appreciated. I can provide build logs and my device repo if needed.
gigoo25 said:
Hello I am trying to port the beloved OmniRom to my device which is a KLTE (Samsung Galaxy S5) I have successfully built the ROM from source using kernel and device configs from CM and of course some fixes and cherry picking. The issue I have now is that the ROM will not boot.
I stays at my carrier logo (Samsung) so it does not even let me cat-log. I tried to install the ROM and then restored a backup of Cyanogenmods system directory. It boots to android but all apps forceclose. I did this to see if it was an issue with the boot image and since it can boot to a different system partition I don't believe its a boot.img issue or kernel issue for that matter. Or is it?
Any help getting this to boot would be appreciated. I can provide build logs and my device repo if needed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MSM8974 is our first CAF chipset we're working on supporting.
I'd suggest looking at the Oppo find7/msm8974-common repos as nearly all initial CAF 8974 work is being done on the Find7.
you need android-5.1-caf branches for frameworks/av and frameworks/native for a CAF device until I finish the merge effort
Entropy512 said:
MSM8974 is our first CAF chipset we're working on supporting.
I'd suggest looking at the Oppo find7/msm8974-common repos as nearly all initial CAF 8974 work is being done on the Find7.
you need android-5.1-caf branches for frameworks/av and frameworks/native for a CAF device until I finish the merge effort
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you! That explains a lot. Maybe you can help me again? I keep coming across building with legacy opposed to CAF and to change it in the configs... What configs are they talking about?
Sent from my SM-G900T using XDA Free mobile app
gigoo25 said:
Thank you! That explains a lot. Maybe you can help me again? I keep coming across building with legacy opposed to CAF and to change it in the configs... What configs are they talking about?
Sent from my SM-G900T using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean AOSP HALs? It's pretty rare for a CAF device to work with vanilla AOSP HALs.
It's the various QCOM_blah_VARIANT flags - 8974s are caf-bfam
Entropy512 said:
You mean AOSP HALs? It's pretty rare for a CAF device to work with vanilla AOSP HALs.
It's the various QCOM_blah_VARIANT flags - 8974s are caf-bfam
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Updated my repo to 5.1 source but still getting errors. Here is the device configs that I am using. I am getting the same errors throughout.
First error was
Code:
frameworks/base/core/jni/android_view_Surface.cpp:206:14: error: 'class android::Surface' has no member named 'setDirtyRect'
surface->setDirtyRect(&rect);
Which I solved by cherry-picking THIS
Next I get an error that msmcal-hwdep.h is not found not sure how to fix this yet...
I recreated my devices config from scratch and uploaded it to git... Maybe you can take a look when you have some free time? It would mean alot! https://github.com/Gigoo25/android_device_samsung_klte
gigoo25 said:
Updated my repo to 5.1 source but still getting errors. Here is the device configs that I am using. I am getting the same errors throughout.
First error was
Code:
frameworks/base/core/jni/android_view_Surface.cpp:206:14: error: 'class android::Surface' has no member named 'setDirtyRect'
surface->setDirtyRect(&rect);
Which I solved by cherry-picking THIS
Next I get an error that msmcal-hwdep.h is not found not sure how to fix this yet...
I recreated my devices config from scratch and uploaded it to git... Maybe you can take a look when you have some free time? It would mean alot! https://github.com/Gigoo25/android_device_samsung_klte
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
msmcal_hwdep - look at the stiff in your kernel source under include/ - all of that header-y stuff in some of the Kconfigs
You shouldn't be cherrypicking that, I'm not sure why Max even put that up. Until I finish the CAF av/native merge, anyone declaring QCOM_HARDWARE should be using the android-5.1-caf branches of av and native
Entropy512 said:
msmcal_hwdep - look at the stiff in your kernel source under include/ - all of that header-y stuff in some of the Kconfigs
You shouldn't be cherrypicking that, I'm not sure why Max even put that up. Until I finish the CAF av/native merge, anyone declaring QCOM_HARDWARE should be using the android-5.1-caf branches of av and native
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome! alright will look into that
Sent from my SM-G900T using XDA Free mobile app
Entropy512 said:
msmcal_hwdep - look at the stiff in your kernel source under include/ - all of that header-y stuff in some of the Kconfigs
You shouldn't be cherrypicking that, I'm not sure why Max even put that up. Until I finish the CAF av/native merge, anyone declaring QCOM_HARDWARE should be using the android-5.1-caf branches of av and native
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Having issues compiling the camera I get the error
Code:
device/samsung/klte/camera/CameraWrapper.cpp: In function 'char* camera_fixup_setparams(int, const char*)':
device/samsung/klte/camera/CameraWrapper.cpp:161:20: error: 'KEY_DIS' is not a member of 'android::CameraParameters'
params.set(android::CameraParameters::KEY_DIS, android::CameraParameters::DIS_DISABLE);
^
device/samsung/klte/camera/CameraWrapper.cpp:161:56: error: 'DIS_DISABLE' is not a member of 'android::CameraParameters'
params.set(android::CameraParameters::KEY_DIS, android::CameraParameters::DIS_DISABLE);
^
device/samsung/klte/camera/CameraWrapper.cpp:162:20: error: 'KEY_ZSL' is not a member of 'android::CameraParameters'
params.set(android::CameraParameters::KEY_ZSL, android::CameraParameters::ZSL_OFF);
^
device/samsung/klte/camera/CameraWrapper.cpp:162:56: error: 'ZSL_OFF' is not a member of 'android::CameraParameters'
params.set(android::CameraParameters::KEY_ZSL, android::CameraParameters::ZSL_OFF);
^
device/samsung/klte/camera/CameraWrapper.cpp:164:20: error: 'KEY_ZSL' is not a member of 'android::CameraParameters'
params.set(android::CameraParameters::KEY_ZSL, android::CameraParameters::ZSL_ON);
^
device/samsung/klte/camera/CameraWrapper.cpp:164:56: error: 'ZSL_ON' is not a member of 'android::CameraParameters'
params.set(android::CameraParameters::KEY_ZSL, android::CameraParameters::ZSL_ON);
^
make: *** [/home/rob/android/omni51/out/target/product/klte/obj/SHARED_LIBRARIES/camera.msm8974_intermediates/CameraWrapper.o] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs...
Is this a framework issue?
gigoo25 said:
Having issues compiling the camera I get the error
Code:
device/samsung/klte/camera/CameraWrapper.cpp: In function 'char* camera_fixup_setparams(int, const char*)':
device/samsung/klte/camera/CameraWrapper.cpp:161:20: error: 'KEY_DIS' is not a member of 'android::CameraParameters'
params.set(android::CameraParameters::KEY_DIS, android::CameraParameters::DIS_DISABLE);
^
device/samsung/klte/camera/CameraWrapper.cpp:161:56: error: 'DIS_DISABLE' is not a member of 'android::CameraParameters'
params.set(android::CameraParameters::KEY_DIS, android::CameraParameters::DIS_DISABLE);
^
device/samsung/klte/camera/CameraWrapper.cpp:162:20: error: 'KEY_ZSL' is not a member of 'android::CameraParameters'
params.set(android::CameraParameters::KEY_ZSL, android::CameraParameters::ZSL_OFF);
^
device/samsung/klte/camera/CameraWrapper.cpp:162:56: error: 'ZSL_OFF' is not a member of 'android::CameraParameters'
params.set(android::CameraParameters::KEY_ZSL, android::CameraParameters::ZSL_OFF);
^
device/samsung/klte/camera/CameraWrapper.cpp:164:20: error: 'KEY_ZSL' is not a member of 'android::CameraParameters'
params.set(android::CameraParameters::KEY_ZSL, android::CameraParameters::ZSL_ON);
^
device/samsung/klte/camera/CameraWrapper.cpp:164:56: error: 'ZSL_ON' is not a member of 'android::CameraParameters'
params.set(android::CameraParameters::KEY_ZSL, android::CameraParameters::ZSL_ON);
^
make: *** [/home/rob/android/omni51/out/target/product/klte/obj/SHARED_LIBRARIES/camera.msm8974_intermediates/CameraWrapper.o] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs...
Is this a framework issue?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks like maybe some missing Samsung patches
Entropy512 said:
Looks like maybe some missing Samsung patches
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I appreciate all the help you have been giving me in trying to port Omni to the KLTE! I could not have done it without you!
I ended up having a booting and working build when I removed the camera and RIL
RIL gives me an error of
Code:
frameworks/opt/telephony/../../../device/samsung/klte/ril/telephony/java/com/android/internal/telephony/KlteRIL.java:282: error: no suitable constructor found for SignalStrength(int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,boolean)
return new SignalStrength(gsmSignalStrength, gsmBitErrorRate, cdmaDbm, cdmaEcio, evdoDbm,
^
constructor SignalStrength.SignalStrength(Parcel) is not applicable
(actual and formal argument lists differ in length)
constructor SignalStrength.SignalStrength(SignalStrength) is not applicable
(actual and formal argument lists differ in length)
constructor SignalStrength.SignalStrength(int,int,int,int,int,int,int,boolean) is not applicable
(actual and formal argument lists differ in length)
constructor SignalStrength.SignalStrength(int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,boolean) is not applicable
(actual and formal argument lists differ in length)
constructor SignalStrength.SignalStrength(boolean) is not applicable
(actual and formal argument lists differ in length)
constructor SignalStrength.SignalStrength() is not applicable
(actual and formal argument lists differ in length)
Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API.
Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.
Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations.
Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
1 error
It should be a frameworks/opt/telephony issue correct? Except it doesn't display the full file path?
gigoo25 said:
I appreciate all the help you have been giving me in trying to port Omni to the KLTE! I could not have done it without you!
I ended up having a booting and working build when I removed the camera and RIL
RIL gives me an error of
Code:
frameworks/opt/telephony/../../../device/samsung/klte/ril/telephony/java/com/android/internal/telephony/KlteRIL.java:282: error: no suitable constructor found for SignalStrength(int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,boolean)
return new SignalStrength(gsmSignalStrength, gsmBitErrorRate, cdmaDbm, cdmaEcio, evdoDbm,
^
constructor SignalStrength.SignalStrength(Parcel) is not applicable
(actual and formal argument lists differ in length)
constructor SignalStrength.SignalStrength(SignalStrength) is not applicable
(actual and formal argument lists differ in length)
constructor SignalStrength.SignalStrength(int,int,int,int,int,int,int,boolean) is not applicable
(actual and formal argument lists differ in length)
constructor SignalStrength.SignalStrength(int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,int,boolean) is not applicable
(actual and formal argument lists differ in length)
constructor SignalStrength.SignalStrength(boolean) is not applicable
(actual and formal argument lists differ in length)
constructor SignalStrength.SignalStrength() is not applicable
(actual and formal argument lists differ in length)
Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API.
Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.
Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations.
Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
1 error
It should be a frameworks/opt/telephony issue correct? Except it doesn't display the full file path?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It looks like the KLTE actually specifies its own RIL subclass (interesting trick, I've never seen that before) and that subclass is depending on something in frameworks/opt/tel that Omni doesn't have.
Either find the missing patch in f/opt/tel or figure out how to adapt KlteRIL.java
Entropy512 said:
It looks like the KLTE actually specifies its own RIL subclass (interesting trick, I've never seen that before) and that subclass is depending on something in frameworks/opt/tel that Omni doesn't have.
Either find the missing patch in f/opt/tel or figure out how to adapt KlteRIL.java
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I seem to have gotten everything working fine besides the camera. The app and libraries compile fine but when the rom boots I cannot see it in the app drawer. When I try to launch it through the lockscreen it just force closes. Not sure what could be causing the problem? All the permissions seem to be checking out, and messing with the BoardConfiv and Device make files has not seemed to help. Any suggestions on how to fix this? Could it be a framework issue?
gigoo25 said:
I seem to have gotten everything working fine besides the camera. The app and libraries compile fine but when the rom boots I cannot see it in the app drawer. When I try to launch it through the lockscreen it just force closes. Not sure what could be causing the problem? All the permissions seem to be checking out, and messing with the BoardConfiv and Device make files has not seemed to help. Any suggestions on how to fix this? Could it be a framework issue?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look through the logcat for camera errors, especially any errors about missing libraries.
Not appearing in app drawer indicates that Android doesn't think there is a camera present. There are 2349734297320 different things that could cause this - missing camera HAL dependency, kernel/HAL mismatch, many other things.
Entropy512 said:
Look through the logcat for camera errors, especially any errors about missing libraries.
Not appearing in app drawer indicates that Android doesn't think there is a camera present. There are 2349734297320 different things that could cause this - missing camera HAL dependency, kernel/HAL mismatch, many other things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is what I found in the logcat
Code:
--------- beginning of crash
[ 06-01 20:08:07.366 3437: 3437 E/AndroidRuntime ]
FATAL EXCEPTION: main
Process: com.android.camera2, PID: 3437
java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to start activity ComponentInfo{com.android.camera2/com.android.camera.CameraActivity}: java.lang.NullPointerException: Attempt to invoke virtual method 'void com.android.camera.util.PhotoSphereHelper$PanoramaViewHelper.onStart()' on a null object reference
at android.app.ActivityThread.performLaunchActivity(ActivityThread.java:2325)
at android.app.ActivityThread.handleLaunchActivity(ActivityThread.java:2387)
at android.app.ActivityThread.access$800(ActivityThread.java:151)
at android.app.ActivityThread$H.handleMessage(ActivityThread.java:1303)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:102)
at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:135)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:5254)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:372)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(ZygoteInit.java:903)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:698)
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException: Attempt to invoke virtual method 'void com.android.camera.util.PhotoSphereHelper$PanoramaViewHelper.onStart()' on a null object reference
at com.android.camera.CameraActivity.onStartTasks(CameraActivity.java:1885)
at com.android.camera.util.QuickActivity.onStart(QuickActivity.java:111)
at android.app.Instrumentation.callActivityOnStart(Instrumentation.java:1236)
at android.app.Activity.performStart(Activity.java:6006)
at android.app.ActivityThread.performLaunchActivity(ActivityThread.java:2288)
... 10 more
gigoo25 said:
Here is what I found in the logcat
Code:
--------- beginning of crash
[ 06-01 20:08:07.366 3437: 3437 E/AndroidRuntime ]
FATAL EXCEPTION: main
Process: com.android.camera2, PID: 3437
java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to start activity ComponentInfo{com.android.camera2/com.android.camera.CameraActivity}: java.lang.NullPointerException: Attempt to invoke virtual method 'void com.android.camera.util.PhotoSphereHelper$PanoramaViewHelper.onStart()' on a null object reference
at android.app.ActivityThread.performLaunchActivity(ActivityThread.java:2325)
at android.app.ActivityThread.handleLaunchActivity(ActivityThread.java:2387)
at android.app.ActivityThread.access$800(ActivityThread.java:151)
at android.app.ActivityThread$H.handleMessage(ActivityThread.java:1303)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:102)
at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:135)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:5254)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:372)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(ZygoteInit.java:903)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:698)
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException: Attempt to invoke virtual method 'void com.android.camera.util.PhotoSphereHelper$PanoramaViewHelper.onStart()' on a null object reference
at com.android.camera.CameraActivity.onStartTasks(CameraActivity.java:1885)
at com.android.camera.util.QuickActivity.onStart(QuickActivity.java:111)
at android.app.Instrumentation.callActivityOnStart(Instrumentation.java:1236)
at android.app.Activity.performStart(Activity.java:6006)
at android.app.ActivityThread.performLaunchActivity(ActivityThread.java:2288)
... 10 more
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty much - if you can't figure out what is wrong from reading a logcat, most likely, you can't figure out what parts of the logcat are relevant and which are not.
That excerpt basically tells me nothing.
I assume that was from trying to forcefully start the camera with no camera actually present as far as Android was concerned. That's a symptom, not the root cause of the problem. Based on what you've described, the root cause of the problem will likely be visible even if no attempt is made to use the camera.
Entropy512 said:
Pretty much - if you can't figure out what is wrong from reading a logcat, most likely, you can't figure out what parts of the logcat are relevant and which are not.
That excerpt basically tells me nothing.
I assume that was from trying to forcefully start the camera with no camera actually present as far as Android was concerned. That's a symptom, not the root cause of the problem. Based on what you've described, the root cause of the problem will likely be visible even if no attempt is made to use the camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been messing around with the device configurations and logcats. I I think I have found the culprit for my camera not working. It shows that it loads the module but then fails to open it? Is this a CameraWrapper issue? Still trying to fix the camera so I can use this as a daily build but I have limited experience as a developer.
EDIT: Also the camera shows up on first boot but then disappears and says that the application is not installed. I'm trying to logcat it but not sure how to do that on the first boot without allowing my PC
EDIT2: From the looks of it searching the web it seems to be an issue with frameworks/av/camera/CameraParameters.cpp & frameworks/av/camera/include/CameraParameters.h
Code:
I/CameraService( 381): CameraService started (pid=381)
I/CameraService( 381): Loaded "MSM8974 Camera Wrapper" camera module
I/CameraWrapper( 381): camera_get_number_of_cameras
I/CameraWrapper( 381): check_vendor_module
I/PackageManager( 741): /system/priv-app/MmsService changed; collecting certs
I/PackageManager( 741): /system/priv-app/OmniSwitch changed; collecting certs
E/HAL ( 381): load: module=/system/lib/hw/camera.vendor.msm8974.so
E/HAL ( 381): dlopen failed: cannot locate symbol "_ZN7android16CameraParameters25KEY_DYNAMIC_RANGE_CONTROLE" referenced by "camera.vendor.msm8974.so"...
E/CameraWrapper( 381): failed to open vendor camera module
gigoo25 said:
I've been messing around with the device configurations and logcats. I I think I have found the culprit for my camera not working. It shows that it loads the module but then fails to open it? Is this a CameraWrapper issue? Still trying to fix the camera so I can use this as a daily build but I have limited experience as a developer.
EDIT: Also the camera shows up on first boot but then disappears and says that the application is not installed. I'm trying to logcat it but not sure how to do that on the first boot without allowing my PC
EDIT2: From the looks of it searching the web it seems to be an issue with frameworks/av/camera/CameraParameters.cpp & frameworks/av/camera/include/CameraParameters.h
Code:
I/CameraService( 381): CameraService started (pid=381)
I/CameraService( 381): Loaded "MSM8974 Camera Wrapper" camera module
I/CameraWrapper( 381): camera_get_number_of_cameras
I/CameraWrapper( 381): check_vendor_module
I/PackageManager( 741): /system/priv-app/MmsService changed; collecting certs
I/PackageManager( 741): /system/priv-app/OmniSwitch changed; collecting certs
E/HAL ( 381): load: module=/system/lib/hw/camera.vendor.msm8974.so
E/HAL ( 381): dlopen failed: cannot locate symbol "_ZN7android16CameraParameters25KEY_DYNAMIC_RANGE_CONTROLE" referenced by "camera.vendor.msm8974.so"...
E/CameraWrapper( 381): failed to open vendor camera module
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks like a patch for CameraParameters needed by your device is missing since no one has tried to bring that device up before, or hasn't tried bringing it up with 5.x
Since it's a Qualcomm-based device and likely using CAF repos, you'll probably have to patch frameworks/av-caf and not frameworks/av - see https://lists.omnirom.org/pipermail/maintainers/2015-June/000101.html for details (we need to add this info to the wiki...)
Entropy512 said:
Looks like a patch for CameraParameters needed by your device is missing since no one has tried to bring that device up before, or hasn't tried bringing it up with 5.x
Since it's a Qualcomm-based device and likely using CAF repos, you'll probably have to patch frameworks/av-caf and not frameworks/av - see https://lists.omnirom.org/pipermail/maintainers/2015-June/000101.html for details (we need to add this info to the wiki...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I would have to split av into two folders then applying I believe THIS patch to av-caf in order to compile it properly?
Also does native-caf branch still have to be merged before compiling?
gigoo25 said:
So I would have to split av into two folders then applying I believe THIS patch to av-caf in order to compile it properly?
Also does native-caf branch still have to be merged before compiling?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, the splitting of av is already done. Native is already merged with ifdefs (it didn't require nearly as much ifdefing as av, so we have a "unified" CAF+AOSP native). The only thing that is needed for device maintainers is adding av-caf to omni.dependencies - see the maintainers list post I linked to, or look at the Oppo find7 history.
So once you're pulling in av-caf via omni.dependencies, you should be able to apply that patch to av-caf and then submit it to Gerrit for review.
You might want to start idling in IRC, #omni is where most device maintainers are (in fact, all maintainers for supported devices idle their routinely, it's now a requirement for maintainers to routinely idle in IRC so they can see what's going on/people can ping them with questions.)
Entropy512 said:
Well, the splitting of av is already done. Native is already merged with ifdefs (it didn't require nearly as much ifdefing as av, so we have a "unified" CAF+AOSP native). The only thing that is needed for device maintainers is adding av-caf to omni.dependencies - see the maintainers list post I linked to, or look at the Oppo find7 history.
So once you're pulling in av-caf via omni.dependencies, you should be able to apply that patch to av-caf and then submit it to Gerrit for review.
You might want to start idling in IRC, #omni is where most device maintainers are (in fact, all maintainers for supported devices idle their routinely, it's now a requirement for maintainers to routinely idle in IRC so they can see what's going on/people can ping them with questions.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Turns out I might of fixed the problem. Instead of messing with frameworks/av I can just override it with a file inside include/camera? Looking back at the Cyanogenmod repo for my device THIS is present while in my source it is not.
Compiling now. Will post results after.
Hello,
I am interested in trying to port sumire to Lineage 16.0, the problem is I couldn't find any guide that seemed to help me get started.
In IRC someone told me I had to:
1. Fork the cm-14.1 branch to lineage-16.0, change the required config files, and build in a 16.0 build env.
2. Wait for it to error out, fix error, repeat. Eventually once it builds, attempt booting, check logs to see why it isn't booting, fix error, repeat.
But as you can see, its not much.
I have been taking a look into the first commits for sumire on cm-14.1, https://github.com/LineageOS/androi...mmit/7be9d2e5edf6f7ea1f399febbeee9d9fbdc122e1
But I do not know if its the best way to learn.
Where could I find some guides?
Best regards
algui91 said:
Hello,
I am interested in trying to port sumire to Lineage 16.0, the problem is I couldn't find any guide that seemed to help me get started.
In IRC someone told me I had to:
1. Fork the cm-14.1 branch to lineage-16.0, change the required config files, and build in a 16.0 build env.
2. Wait for it to error out, fix error, repeat. Eventually once it builds, attempt booting, check logs to see why it isn't booting, fix error, repeat.
But as you can see, its not much.
I have been taking a look into the first commits for sumire on cm-14.1, https://github.com/LineageOS/androi...mmit/7be9d2e5edf6f7ea1f399febbeee9d9fbdc122e1
But I do not know if its the best way to learn.
Where could I find some guides?
Best regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not really a guide, but the guy in this thread tried to port LOS 15 to the Z5, so it's probably the best place to start. He ran into issues with the camera so take a look at the last few pages too see what's going on. The people in that thread are willing to help.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/z5...erimental-lineageos-15-1-z5c-suzuran-t3894617
Devo7v said:
It's not really a guide, but the guy in this thread tried to port LOS 15 to the Z5, so it's probably the best place to start. He ran into issues with the camera so take a look at the last few pages too see what's going on. The people in that thread are willing to help.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/z5...erimental-lineageos-15-1-z5c-suzuran-t3894617
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, although its not for the same device (Mine is sumire) it may be helpful.
I have also found this guide, it seems interesting:
https://fat-tire.github.io/porting-intro.html
algui91 said:
Thanks, although its not for the same device (Mine is sumire) it may be helpful.
I have also found this guide, it seems interesting:
https://fat-tire.github.io/porting-intro.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there any progress at porting LOS 16?
BrazzerHead said:
Is there any progress at porting LOS 16?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm still on it. Advancing slowly as I am a newbie on this and only have a few hours/week to do it.
I will keep you updated
I have successfully come to execute brunch sumire, but I am having problems with open jdk-9:
Code:
/run/media/hkr/BackUp/out/soong/make_vars-lineage_sumire.mk:644: warning: JAVAC does not match between Make and Soong:
/run/media/hkr/BackUp/out/soong/make_vars-lineage_sumire.mk:644: warning: Make : /home/hkr/.gentoo/java-config-2/current-user-vm/bin/javac
/run/media/hkr/BackUp/out/soong/make_vars-lineage_sumire.mk:644: warning: Soong: prebuilts/jdk/jdk9/linux-x86/bin/javac
/run/media/hkr/BackUp/out/soong/make_vars-lineage_sumire.mk:1044: error: Soong variable check failed.
I have copied the prebuild version of java that comes with android into my own local version in gentoo, but still getting the same error.
Any ideas?
I have set up android_device_sony_sumire from sony-msm8994 in the included .repo/local_manifest. Setting ROOMSERVICE_BRANCHES=cm-14 as it functions as a fallback branch was suggested in the console output while i was getting familiar and this is a helpful feature worth noting.
There is an incompatibility in https://github.com/sony-msm8994/android_device_sony_sumire and kitakami-common, the lineage.dependencies file needs to be moved or it will try and download dependencies for the sumire files from the LineageOS Github (http://github.com/LineageOS). Next there are two easy defines, SND_AUDIOCODEC_ALAC and SND_AUDIOCODEC_APE to deal with before an untimely error because of a typo present in the Xperia kernel, content_interprtation_type instead of content_interpretation_type.
Code:
hardware/qcom/media-caf/msm8994/mm-video-v4l2/vidc/vdec/src/omx_vdec_msm8974.cpp:9377:60: error: no member named 'content_interprtation_type' in 'msm_vidc_s3d_frame_packing_payload'; did you mean 'content_interpretation_type'?
if (s3d_frame_packing_payload->content_interprtation_type == 1)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
content_interpretation_type
out/target/product/sumire/obj/KERNEL_OBJ/usr/include/media/msm_vidc.h:109:15: note: 'content_interpretation_type' declared here
unsigned int content_interpretation_type;
^
hardware/qcom/media-caf/msm8994/mm-video-v4l2/vidc/vdec/src/omx_vdec_msm8974.cpp:9379:65: error: no member named 'content_interprtation_type' in 'msm_vidc_s3d_frame_packing_payload'; did you mean 'content_interpretation_type'?
else if (s3d_frame_packing_payload->content_interprtation_type == 2)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
content_interpretation_type
out/target/product/sumire/obj/KERNEL_OBJ/usr/include/media/msm_vidc.h:109:15: note: 'content_interpretation_type' declared here
unsigned int content_interpretation_type;
^
hardware/qcom/media-caf/msm8994/mm-video-v4l2/vidc/vdec/src/omx_vdec_msm8974.cpp:9394:89: error: no member named 'content_interprtation_type' in 'msm_vidc_s3d_frame_packing_payload'; did you mean 'content_interpretation_type'?
s3d_frame_packing_payload->fpa_type, s3d_frame_packing_payload->content_interprtation_type, stereo_output_mode);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
content_interpretation_type
It compiled, but gives a black boot screen both from early boot, a kernel issue, adb seems to be communicating, I'm meddling with the boot image atm so i will know more later (Later: The updated mdss code broke for our case somewhere. I will also need to work on the local_manifest) (Later: New Manifest attached) . Last I tested the kernel a few moons ago it worked on the Z1, so issue this was a surprise... I will also import the changes from the sony-msm8994 project, who is doing a great job, i see quite a lot of work to the sdcardfs code.
threader said:
It compiled, but gives a black boot screen both from early boot, a kernel issue, adb seems to be communicating, I'm meddling with the boot image atm so i will know more later (Later: The updated mdss code broke for our case somewhere. I will also need to work on the local_manifest) (Later: New Manifest attached) . Last I tested the kernel a few moons ago it worked on the Z1, so issue this was a surprise... I will also import the changes from the sony-msm8994 project, who is doing a great job, i see quite a lot of work to the sdcardfs code.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How did you managed to compile it? I am finding a lot of problems, for example, in system/core/init/util.h
Code:
#include <android-base/chrono_utils.h>
#include <selinux/label.h>
were not found, so I had to comment them out, but I do not know if this its going to be the best approach...
@algui91
Im about to test what built tonight. I suspect i need to port the binder from sony-msm8994 though, it lookst tasty anyway. But does your build by any chance warn against building with a pre compiled kernel? I guess or simply some headers might have new names maybe or some feature needs to be introduced into the kernel.
The .repo/local_manifest/oss.xml contains some qcom opensource projects, to compile for 16.1 change opensource-location from revision=o-mr to p-mr. Also add https://github.com/sonyxperiadev/transpower/commits/android-8.1.0_r35, for 15.1 or probably master for 16.1, i missed that yesterday.
threader said:
@algui91
Im about to test what built tonight. I suspect i need to port the binder from sony-msm8994 though, it lookst tasty anyway. But does your build by any chance warn against building with a pre compiled kernel? I guess or simply some headers might have new names maybe or some feature needs to be introduced into the kernel.
The .repo/local_manifest/oss.xml contains some qcom opensource projects, to compile for 16.1 change opensource-location from revision=o-mr to p-mr. Also add https://github.com/sonyxperiadev/transpower/commits/android-8.1.0_r35, for 15.1 or probably master for 16.1, i missed that yesterday.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello,
Thanks for your quick reply, How did your test went? this are the only warnings I get when running brunch sumire:
Code:
build/make/core/combo/TARGET_linux-arm.mk:43: warning: cortex-a53.a57 is armv8-a.
build/make/core/combo/TARGET_linux-arm.mk:45: warning: TARGET_2ND_ARCH_VARIANT, armv7-a-neon, ignored! Use armv8-a instead.
Trying dependencies-only mode on a non-existing device tree?
I applied the required binder changes from sony-msm8994 for AOSP 8.1 and it turns out it results in a locked kernel that fails to even boot, so i'm looking that problem now. So for instant results instead of my Z1 to Z5 kernel, use https://github.com/sony-msm8994/android_kernel_sony_msm8994 in , .repo/local_manifests/LA.BR.1.3.3_rb2.14.xml , you need to comment out common-headers common-kernel, also i see i commented out my kernel, a good place to add sony-msm8994, i realize my project to update the unified kernel is riddled with mines., and we really need 15.1 and 16.1 yesterday.
I've come around to testing the whole Sony-msm8994 project that's up on Z5c, Lineage 15.1 is up with wifi, location, nfc available at least, so is the usb otg switch, not working is fingerprint and gsm services, camera.
Spotted this in logcat.
Code:
Abort message: 'CANNOT LINK EXECUTABLE "/system/bin/netmgrd": cannot locate symbol "_ZN6google8protobuf2io16CodedInputStream20ReadVarint32FallbackEPj" referenced by "/system/vendor/lib64/libcneapiclient.so"...'
TARGET_CPU_VARIANT in device/sony/kitakami-common/BoardConfigCommon.mk is set to generic, it's supposed to be TARGET_CPU_VARIANT := cortex-a53
threader said:
I've come around to testing the whole Sony-msm8994 project that's up on Z5c, Lineage 15.1 is up with wifi, location, nfc available at least, so is the usb otg switch, not working is fingerprint and gsm services, camera.
Spotted this in logcat.
Code:
Abort message: 'CANNOT LINK EXECUTABLE "/system/bin/netmgrd": cannot locate symbol "_ZN6google8protobuf2io16CodedInputStream20ReadVarint32FallbackEPj" referenced by "/system/vendor/lib64/libcneapiclient.so"...'
TARGET_CPU_VARIANT in device/sony/kitakami-common/BoardConfigCommon.mk is set to generic, it's supposed to be TARGET_CPU_VARIANT := cortex-a53
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have the same problem, spotted the same Fatal message, Did the change in TARGET_CPU_VARIANT solved the problem?
Best
I've got a problem with librmnetctl, vendor/qcom/opensource/dataservices, not building, netmgrd is complaining about that missing now, I'm trying the version on Xperiadev, but now I've messed up the build i built earlier and need to rebuild all of it...
threader said:
I've got a problem with librmnetctl, vendor/qcom/opensource/dataservices, not building, netmgrd is complaining about that missing now, I'm trying the version on Xperiadev, but now I've messed up the build i built earlier and need to rebuild all of it...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am trying to detect where the error
Code:
Abort message: 'CANNOT LINK EXECUTABLE "/system/bin/netmgrd": cannot locate symbol "_ZN6google8protobuf2io16CodedInputStream20ReadVarint32FallbackEPj" referenced by "/system/vendor/lib64/libcneapiclient.so"...'
comes from.
I am guessing its some makefile which has a SHARED_LIBRARY link to _ZN6google8protobuf2io16CodedInputStream20ReadVarint32FallbackEPj missing, but do not know where to find it. I've searched on the LineageOS repos without luck.
algui91 said:
I am trying to detect where the error
Code:
Abort message: 'CANNOT LINK EXECUTABLE "/system/bin/netmgrd": cannot locate symbol "_ZN6google8protobuf2io16CodedInputStream20ReadVarint32FallbackEPj" referenced by "/system/vendor/lib64/libcneapiclient.so"...'
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems to be called from protobuf, maybe a missing link to it somewhere?
threader said:
It seems to be called from protobuf, maybe a missing link to it somewhere?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems so, the question is where that 'Somewhere' is. . Will keep searching.
algui91 said:
It seems so, the question is where that 'Somewhere' is. . Will keep searching.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see its in prebuilt compiler also.
But maybe?
Code:
external/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/io/coded_stream.cc :
Los 14.1
bool CodedInputStream::ReadVarint32Fallback(uint32* value) {
if (BufferSize() >= kMaxVarintBytes ||
// Optimization: We're also safe if the buffer is non-empty and it ends
// with a byte that would terminate a varint.
(buffer_end_ > buffer_ && !(buffer_end_[-1] & 0x80))) {
const uint8* end = ReadVarint32FromArray(buffer_, value);
if (end == NULL) return false;
buffer_ = end;
return true;
} else {
// Really slow case: we will incur the cost of an extra function call here,
// but moving this out of line reduces the size of this function, which
// improves the common case. In micro benchmarks, this is worth about 10-15%
return ReadVarint32Slow(value);
}
}
Los.15.1
int64 CodedInputStream::ReadVarint32Fallback(uint32 first_byte_or_zero) {
if (BufferSize() >= kMaxVarintBytes ||
// Optimization: We're also safe if the buffer is non-empty and it ends
// with a byte that would terminate a varint.
(buffer_end_ > buffer_ && !(buffer_end_[-1] & 0x80))) {
GOOGLE_DCHECK_NE(first_byte_or_zero, 0)
<< "Caller should provide us with *buffer_ when buffer is non-empty";
uint32 temp;
::std::pair<bool, const uint8*> p =
ReadVarint32FromArray(first_byte_or_zero, buffer_, &temp);
if (!p.first) return -1;
buffer_ = p.second;
return temp;
} else {
// Really slow case: we will incur the cost of an extra function call here,
// but moving this out of line reduces the size of this function, which
// improves the common case. In micro benchmarks, this is worth about 10-15%
uint32 temp;
return ReadVarint32Slow(&temp) ? static_cast<int64>(temp) : -1;
}
}
The function ReadVarint32Fallback is used in the following libraries :
vendor/sony/kitakami-common/proprietary/vendor/lib64/libsettings.so
vendor/sony/kitakami-common/proprietary/vendor/lib64/libcneapiclient.so
vendor/sony/kitakami-common/proprietary/vendor/lib/libsettings.so
vendor/sony/kitakami-common/proprietary/vendor/lib/libcneapiclient.so
vendor/sony/kitakami-common/proprietary/vendor/lib/mediadrm/libwvdrmengine.so
So i rolled back the functions required by the libraries in external/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/io/coded_stream.h, external/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/io/coded_stream.cc, attached a patch to get a bit farther .
I get the following error now.
Code:
520 F DEBUG : Abort message: 'CANNOT LINK EXECUTABLE "/system/bin/netmgrd": cannot locate symbol "_ZN6google8protobuf8internal14WireFormatLite10ReadStringEPNS0_2io16CodedInputStreamEPNSt3__112basic_stringIcNS6_11char_traitsIcEENS6_9allocatorIcEEEE" referenced by "/system/vendor/lib64/libcneapiclient.so"...'
I think the correct thing to do now is call ReadStringEPNS0_2io16CodedInputStreamEPNSt3__112basic_stringIcNS6_11char_traitsIcEENS6_9allocatorIcEEEE
Dear all,
I am trying to build a LineageOS 17.1 ROM for the Galaxy Tab A 9.7 (gt510lte) SM-T555.
Using the repos of @retiredtab and aala27's repos I managed to build a config that resulted in a buildable LineageOS that I could install and that shows the Lineage boot animation but crashes/reboots after a while.
Fyi, my forks for the GT510LTE (SM-T555) I currently maintain here: https://github.com/blizzard4591?tab=repositories
Questions to @retiredtab:
- What is your current local_manifest/roomservice? I could not locate this in your Github and used one posted by aala27 in a different thread, but it might be "off".
- Did you extract the required proprietary files by hand from stock ROMs or is there an automated way? I have "SM-T555_1_20190103084053_we4a668guy_fac" with T555XXU1CQHA/T555XXU1CRG1 that I know works on my T555.
- The repo "vendor-samsung-gt5note10wifi" in your Github only contains a branch for Lineage 18.1, is that intentional?
Sadly, I am a total noob in the area of building Lineage, so I might miss some obvious things!
I am willing to put in some time and effort to make this work, but I just do not know enough to do it efficiently.
If you can spare the time for a few hints, I believe I can make some progress!
Cheers
Update 1:
My image is working, i.e. it boots and gives a stable system.
Problem: Bluetooth does not work and crashes a lot, I have no clue what the problem is.
Problem: Audio is not working, I see a lot of "audio_route: unable to find path 'low-latency-playback speaker'
The system settings dialog is missing the "Android Patchlevel" information - is this expected? I am building using "repo sync, breakfast gt510lte, brunch gt510lte" - is this correct? I am just an idiot.
Update 2:
Bluetooth and Audio are working, SELinux is not, so permissive it is for now.
Builds available on request.
RandomAndroidTinkerer said:
- What is your current local_manifest/roomservice? I could not locate this in your Github and used one posted by aala27 in a different thread, but it might be "off".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was there before, but I think after the switch to Xenforo on Dec 1, 2020, it might have gotten lost. It's there now and what I use to generate 17.1 for T550.
RandomAndroidTinkerer said:
- Did you extract the required proprietary files by hand from stock ROMs or is there an automated way? I have "SM-T555_1_20190103084053_we4a668guy_fac" with T555XXU1CQHA/T555XXU1CRG1 that I know works on my T555.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, I just used what's in at https://github.com/Galaxy-MSM8916. Having said that, I found that for the SM-T350, it was missing some very important files so I grabbed those from stock.
RandomAndroidTinkerer said:
- The repo "vendor-samsung-gt5note10wifi" in your Github only contains a branch for Lineage 18.1, is that intentional?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
gt5note10wifi is for the P550, not T550. You shouldn't be using that as the *.mk files won't copy the correct blobs for your device.
RandomAndroidTinkerer said:
Update 1:
My image is working, i.e. it boots and gives a stable system.
Problem: Bluetooth does not work and crashes a lot, I have no clue what the problem is.
The system settings dialog is missing the "Android Patchlevel" information - is this expected? I am building using "repo sync, breakfast gt510lte, brunch gt510lte" - is this correct?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Congrats on getting a bootable stable system. For bluetooth, you are probably missing a bluetooth blob. Look in your adb logcat (see below) for red messages that are bluetooth related. It might say something like "missing libbt-nv.so".
Missing Android Patchlevel means you don't have a property declared in your *.mk file. Right now, I can' t remember what it is, but I will look for it.
Instead of brunch, I do
Code:
TARGET_BUILD_TYPE=debug TARGET_BUILD_VARIANT=eng make -j2 bacon
This makes an engineering build that starts adb logcat immediately. That way, you can see all the messages as soon as the device boots. It helps a lot in troubleshooting stuck at boot animation problems.
The -j2 indicates how many CPU cores I have. If you have more, say 4, then -j4.
Once you solved all your problems and if you want to share your ROM, then do a brunch which is userdebug by default (for me, I just do a make -j2 bacon).
For adb logcat, I find
Code:
adb logcat -C | nl
helpful. It color codes the log so anything in red (error) needs attention. Nl numbers the log so it's easier to remember where you error messages are vs a timestamp.
For the Android patch level, show me a screenshot so I exactly what you mean.
RandomAndroidTinkerer said:
Problem: Audio is not working, I see a lot of "audio_route: unable to find path 'low-latency-playback speaker'
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try not to edit your initial post because I didnt' see the audio problem. Just make a new one so that I see new responses.
The audio problem is likely you don't have the correct definition in mixer_paths.xml. aala27 had the exact same problem. It's likely this
[UNOFFICIAL][ROM] LineageOS 17.1 for Galaxy Tab A 9.7[SM-P550]
NOTE: There is no S-pen support. If you need S-pen, DO NOT USE THIS ROM. I am not responsible for lost data, identity theft, lost money, security vulnerabilities, bricked devices or any other hardware or software malfunctions that comes as a...
forum.xda-developers.com
For SM-T550, the line inside mixer_paths.xml looks like
Code:
<path name="low-latency-playback speaker">
<ctl name="QUAT_MI2S_RX Audio Mixer MultiMedia5" value="1" />
</path>
You can see above, I have a path name that matches 'low-latency-playback speaker' exactly. Your mixer_paths.xml probably doesn't have this defined so you get no audio.
BTW, all the info I'm giving wasn't available via search engine when I first started. It's extremely frustrating to troubleshoot when I first started. Even now, I have problems with audio over bluetooth and stuttering audio over bluetooth for two platforms that both worked perfectly on the previous last major revision on Android.
Thank you so much; I know how hard this kind of initial research is!
Regarding the audio issues:
I tried that already, as you can see in https://github.com/blizzard4591/android_device_samsung_gt510lte/tree/lineage-17.1/configs/audio I used the config files from my stock image (I had assumed they would work, but they do not - why?) and then added said speaker there, but no luck, it still has the same error message. What am I misunderstanding?
Regarding Bluetooth:
Thanks to you tip, I added the libbt-nv.so module, but this did not change the situation.
I am now building a debug/eng build, but in the log I still see no messages of missing drivers/firmware/SOs. You can find my Logcat attached - could you take a look and tell me whether I am missing something? Should there be messages?
How did you find out that you were missing BLOBs?
RandomAndroidTinkerer said:
I tried that already, as you can see in https://github.com/blizzard4591/android_device_samsung_gt510lte/tree/lineage-17.1/configs/audio I used the config files from my stock image (I had assumed they would work, but they do not - why?) and then added said speaker there, but no luck, it still has the same error message. What am I misunderstanding?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need to check the actual rom image to see if the mixer_paths.xml is correct. Do
Code:
adb pull /system/vendor/etc/mixer_paths.xml
and compare if the two are the same.
RandomAndroidTinkerer said:
Regarding Bluetooth:
Thanks to you tip, I added the libbt-nv.so module, but this did not change the situation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I only guessed at what might be missing. The logs will tell who what's missing.
RandomAndroidTinkerer said:
You can find my Logcat attached - could you take a look and tell me whether I am missing something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see no log attached. Zip the log and then attach it.
You need to check the actual rom image to see if the mixer_paths.xml is correct. Do
Code:
adb pull /system/vendor/etc/mixer_paths.xml
and compare if the two are the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, the file was incorrect, I guess the path
Code:
$(LOCAL_PATH)/configs/audio/mixer_paths.xml:$(TARGET_COPY_OUT_VENDOR)/etc/mixer_paths.xml
did not resolve to where it should, I changed that, once the build is done I will check.
I see no log attached. Zip the log and then attach it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting, I can see it, but I attached it as ZIP!
The log you attached is missing all the bootup sequence. You need to start adb logcat as soon as the device boots.
Audio
=====
Your mixer_paths.xml should be in /vendor/etc. /system/vendor is usually a link to /vendor. From my P550.
Code:
$ adb shell
gt5note10wifi:/ # ls -al vendor
lrw-r--r-- 1 root root 14 2008-12-31 17:00 vendor -> /system/vendor
If you are using the 17.1 msm8916-common repo, see lines 80 to 83
android_device_samsung_msm8916-common/msm8916.mk at lineage-17.1 · Galaxy-MSM8916/android_device_samsung_msm8916-common
Common MSM8916 tree for Samsung devices. Contribute to Galaxy-MSM8916/android_device_samsung_msm8916-common development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com
may be overwriting your stock mixer_paths. I would comment out lines 80 to 83 as a test.
Bluetooth
=========
You have tons of errors with your bluetooth. If you view your logcat in color, these are all in red.
Code:
04-01 13:19:22.910 1212 1212 F DEBUG : *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
04-01 13:19:22.911 1212 1212 F DEBUG : LineageOS Version: '17.1-20210401-UNOFFICIAL-gt510lte'
04-01 13:19:22.911 1212 1212 F DEBUG : Build fingerprint: 'samsung/gt510ltexx/gt510lte:7.1.1/NMF26X/T555XXU1CQI8:user/release-keys'
04-01 13:19:22.911 1212 1212 F DEBUG : Revision: '8'
04-01 13:19:22.911 1212 1212 F DEBUG : ABI: 'arm'
04-01 13:19:22.912 1212 1212 F DEBUG : Timestamp: 2021-04-01 13:19:22+0200
04-01 13:19:22.912 1212 1212 F DEBUG : pid: 866, tid: 1203, name: bt_hci_thread >>> com.android.bluetooth <<<
04-01 13:19:22.912 1212 1212 F DEBUG : uid: 1002
04-01 13:19:22.912 1212 1212 F DEBUG : signal 6 (SIGABRT), code -1 (SI_QUEUE), fault addr --------
04-01 13:19:22.912 1212 1212 F DEBUG : Abort message: '[0401/131922.772914:FATAL:hci_layer_android.cc(119)] Check failed: btHci != nullptr.
When it crashes hard like above, there's no way bluetooth will work.
Again, if you are using the 17.1 msm8916-common repo, it's missing the bluetooth entries for manifest.xml and msm8916.mk.
For the manifest.xml you need something like
Code:
<hal format="hidl">
<name>android.hardware.bluetooth</name>
<transport arch="32+64">passthrough</transport>
<version>1.0</version>
<interface>
<name>IBluetoothHci</name>
<instance>default</instance>
</interface>
</hal>
For msm8916.mk, you need
Code:
# Bluetooth
PRODUCT_PACKAGES += \
[email protected]
[Sorry for the delay]
Okay, I think I ironed out most of the issues.
What is confirmed working:
- WLAN
- Bluetooth
- Audio
- GPS (though the initial fix took 30min+...)
What does not work
- SELinux
WLAN:
I see a messages like
wificond: No Offload Service available
wificond: Offload HAL not supported
wificond: Failed to get NL80211_ATTR_EXT_FEATURES
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that an issue? I don't know...
I see a lot of messages from the PowerHAL:
QTI PowerHAL: Failed to acquire lock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already tried https://review.statixos.com/c/android_device_essential_mata/+/1626/1 but that apparently was not enough.
SELInux:
I added the policies by https://github.com/VirsysElectron/android_device_samsung_gt510wifi and made them work, but it seems they are not really working.
Example:
I/init ( 233): type=1400 audit(0.0:4): avc: denied { mounton } for path="/firmware-modem" dev="mmcblk0p25" ino=27 scontext=u:r:init:s0 tcontext=ubject_r:tmp_root_mount_file:s0 tclass=dir permissive=1
I/e2fsck ( 253): type=1400 audit(0.0:5): avc: denied { read } for name="mmcblk0p13" dev="tmpfs" ino=7580 scontext=u:r:fsck:s0 tcontext=ubject_r:efs_block_device:s0 tclass=blk_file permissive=1
I/e2fsck ( 253): type=1400 audit(0.0:6): avc: denied { open } for path="/dev/block/mmcblk0p13" dev="tmpfs" ino=7580 scontext=u:r:fsck:s0 tcontext=ubject_r:efs_block_device:s0 tclass=blk_file permissive=1
I/e2fsck ( 253): type=1400 audit(0.0:7): avc: denied { write } for name="mmcblk0p13" dev="tmpfs" ino=7580 scontext=u:r:fsck:s0 tcontext=ubject_r:efs_block_device:s0 tclass=blk_file permissive=1
I/e2fsck ( 253): type=1400 audit(0.0:8): avc: denied { ioctl } for path="/dev/block/mmcblk0p13" dev="tmpfs" ino=7580 ioctlcmd=127c scontext=u:r:fsck:s0 tcontext=ubject_r:efs_block_device:s0 tclass=blk_file permissive=1
I/init ( 1): type=1400 audit(0.0:9): avc: denied { relabelfrom } for name="rmt_storage" dev="debugfs" ino=6571 scontext=u:r:init:s0 tcontext=ubject_r:debugfs_rmt:s0 tclass=dir permissive=1
I/init ( 1): type=1400 audit(0.0:10): avc: denied { relabelfrom } for name="rmts" dev="debugfs" ino=6574 scontext=u:r:init:s0 tcontext=ubject_r:debugfs_rmt:s0 tclass=file permissive=1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I declare
/firmware-modem(/.*)? ubject_r:tmp_root_mount_file:s0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in device/samsung/gt510lte/sepolicy/file_contexts, but it is not applied:
dr-xr-x--- 3 system drmrpc ubject_r:vfat:s0 16384 1970-01-01 01:00 firmware-modem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And I really do not know enough about SELinux to effectively engage this.
@retiredtab: How did you solve SELinux in your builds for the T550?
RandomAndroidTinkerer said:
- GPS (though the initial fix took 30min+...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That seems like a really long time. Did you go outside to do the GPS reading? Sometimes it makes a difference if you are in or outside. You should do an adb logcat while testing out GPS. It might show some clues as to why it takes so long.
With the P550 and using GPStest from
GPSTest | F-Droid - Free and Open Source Android App Repository
An app for testing GPS and GNSS capabilities of a device
f-droid.org
I get a lock in 48 seconds by the window.
RandomAndroidTinkerer said:
What does not work
- SELinux
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need to read posts 202 and beyond at
[ROM][SM-T350][UNOFFICIAL][crDroidAndroid-10.0][v6.17][ANDROID 10] Galaxy Tab A 8.0
Finally this thread is back :)
forum.xda-developers.com
I list the tools that you can use to help build selinux policies. As I wrote in the other thread, do you blindly trust the policies generated by the tools? I'm not an expert so I don't know and it's highly dependent on each hardware device.
I built an image with selinux enforcing as a test sometime in March and while it works, I'm not confident and ready to release that. In addition, each device will require it's own set of selinux policies. What might work for the P550 may not work on the T555 due to differences in hardware (LTE, S-pen).
Building the correct selinux policies is an iterative exercise. Wipe everything on your device, format data. Install the ROM only. You grant the initial batch of policies, reboot, look at logs, grant some more and repeat until they are gone. You should do this with the ROM only. Don't load gapps, games, apps, etc and then run selinux.
RandomAndroidTinkerer said:
Is that an issue? I don't know...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see them in my own builds and so far there's been no problem.
RandomAndroidTinkerer said:
I see a lot of messages from the PowerHAL:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same as above.
RandomAndroidTinkerer said:
I already tried https://review.statixos.com/c/android_device_essential_mata/+/1626/1 but that apparently was not enough.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You will find through experience and more building that what works for one platform may not work for another. It's highly dependent on the device and code specific to that device.
RandomAndroidTinkerer said:
SELInux:
I added the policies by https://github.com/VirsysElectron/android_device_samsung_gt510wifi and made them work, but it seems they are not really working.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In order to boot selinux enforcing, you need to remove line 140 from
android_device_samsung_msm8916-common/BoardConfigCommon.mk at lineage-17.1 · blizzard4591/android_device_samsung_msm8916-common
Common MSM8916 tree for Samsung devices. Contribute to blizzard4591/android_device_samsung_msm8916-common development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com
Also, I'm not an expert in selinux, but I don't know why you would permit untrusted_app.te, untrusted_app_25.te and untrusted_app_27.te?
retiredtab said:
That seems like a really long time. Did you go outside to do the GPS reading? Sometimes it makes a difference if you are in or outside. You should do an adb logcat while testing out GPS. It might show some clues as to why it takes so long.
With the P550 and using GPStest from
GPSTest | F-Droid - Free and Open Source Android App Repository
An app for testing GPS and GNSS capabilities of a device
f-droid.org
I get a lock in 48 seconds by the window.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it was just the initial, first fix, and yes, I was not in the best position. Now that it knows where and when it is, a new fix even inside takes a couple of seconds. I used the same tool, also from F-Droid
retiredtab said:
You need to read posts 202 and beyond at
[ROM][SM-T350][UNOFFICIAL][crDroidAndroid-10.0][v6.17][ANDROID 10] Galaxy Tab A 8.0
Finally this thread is back :)
forum.xda-developers.com
I list the tools that you can use to help build selinux policies. As I wrote in the other thread, do you blindly trust the policies generated by the tools? I'm not an expert so I don't know and it's highly dependent on each hardware device.
I built an image with selinux enforcing as a test sometime in March and while it works, I'm not confident and ready to release that. In addition, each device will require it's own set of selinux policies. What might work for the P550 may not work on the T555 due to differences in hardware (LTE, S-pen).
Building the correct selinux policies is an iterative exercise. Wipe everything on your device, format data. Install the ROM only. You grant the initial batch of policies, reboot, look at logs, grant some more and repeat until they are gone. You should do this with the ROM only. Don't load gapps, games, apps, etc and then run selinux.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had to load Magisk and LiveBoot to even get the early-boot log. Using ADB logcat I was unable to get a log from "system start" - the adb process would hang and wait for the device to be fully booted. Even afterwards, no messages from boot. I had USB debugging enabled, default USB conf "file transfer", etc.
Any ideas what I am doing wrong?
retiredtab said:
I see them in my own builds and so far there's been no problem.
Same as above.
You will find through experience and more building that what works for one platform may not work for another. It's highly dependent on the device and code specific to that device.
In order to boot selinux enforcing, you need to remove line 140 from
android_device_samsung_msm8916-common/BoardConfigCommon.mk at lineage-17.1 · blizzard4591/android_device_samsung_msm8916-common
Common MSM8916 tree for Samsung devices. Contribute to blizzard4591/android_device_samsung_msm8916-common development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com
Also, I'm not an expert in selinux, but I don't know why you would permit untrusted_app.te, untrusted_app_25.te and untrusted_app_27.te?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good catch - I simply copied the policies from VirsysElectron to start, but since they do not really work, I don't think I will continue much on this path. I share your opinion on old drivers and the greater picture. I had hoped the old policies would work for most of the basics, but they do not.
RandomAndroidTinkerer said:
I had to load Magisk and LiveBoot to even get the early-boot log.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For an eng build, there's no need for Magisk and LiveBoot to get an adb logcat. Part of the eng parameters is that it enables adb right away.
For developing selinux policies, you leave it in permissive first, develop the policies as I stated and then when you think you are done, then enable selinux enforcing. More at
Validating SELinux | Android Open Source Project
source.android.com
RandomAndroidTinkerer said:
Good catch - I simply copied the policies from VirsysElectron to start,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And that's the problem right there. It's so easy to kang or copy someone else's work today (legal or illegal) that some don't bother to check if it's right in the first place. I'm not saying VirsysElectron code is wrong, he may have a good reason why those files are generated.
I also fall into that boat. I use the public open source repos, but there's no way that I have the expertise or time to check everything in the repo for errors, security vulnerabilities, code correctness, etc.
retiredtab said:
For an eng build, there's no need for Magisk and LiveBoot to get an adb logcat. Part of the eng parameters is that it enables adb right away.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, that is the problem - it did not. I am using eng-builds and, as I described, adb did not work, and I have no clue why.
retiredtab said:
For developing selinux policies, you leave it in permissive first, develop the policies as I stated and then when you think you are done, then enable selinux enforcing. More at
Validating SELinux | Android Open Source Project
source.android.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read that and some other introductions to SELinux, I get the general idea and concept - but as shown in my example, the labeling rule
/firmware-modem(/.*)? u: object_r :tmp_root_mount_file:s0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is not applied, I did not find anything that would tell me why or how to debug such an issue.
retiredtab said:
And that's the problem right there. It's so easy to kang or copy someone else's work today (legal or illegal) that some don't bother to check if it's right in the first place. I'm not saying VirsysElectron code is wrong, he may have a good reason why those files are generated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I started writing my own policies from scratch (its somewhere in the repo history), but I first wanted to get my bearings, see how things work - ideally from a known, working starting point - which was a good idea, as otherwise the issue mentioned above regarding the labeling rule that does not get applied would have cost me much more sanity than just questioning someone else's code
Hello RandomAndroidTinkerer
I also own a T555, currently with TWRP 3.3.1 and LineageOS 16.0 from Virsys( 20191231). It's very stable, except the SIM didn't work.
Am of course interested in your image and would like to test it out. Which TWRP version do you use ?
Friendly greetings
Schaagi
Hallo RandomAndroidTinkerer,
thank you very much for your work and of course thanks for retiredtab and the others for their work This is my first post here and I you are the only one I found who builded an actual image. I'm very interested in testing your build. Could you send me an link, please? Thank you and bye bye.
Hi, I applied for an uploader account at AndroidFileHost, once this is granted I will upload a current build.
Current engineering build is up: https://www.androidfilehost.com/?w=files&flid=324776
I am using TWRP 3.1.0 from here.
Be kind on the feedback
RandomAndroidTinkerer said:
Current engineering build is up: https://www.androidfilehost.com/?w=files&flid=324776
I am using TWRP 3.1.0 from here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For fun, I tried it on the P550 and not surprisingly, it doesn't boot. It doesn't even out adb logcat.
LineageOS also builds it's own recovery.img as another recovery option to TWRP. It's not as user friendly and lacks some features, but it's functional.
Thank you so much for your image - I am very excited to test it. Feedback follows in the next days.