Database Users

ICS benchmarks versus GB

Previously with GB:
Browsermark - 99,857
Sunspider - 1826ms
ICS after this mornings update:
Browsermark - 124,672
Sunspider - 1488ms
Wow, roughly 25% improvement in both

Could you please try a full benchmark with Quadrant?

Quadrant standard full benchmark - 3748 (3871 on second run)

straxusii said:
Quadrant standard full benchmark - 3748
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
So a little bit higher than the score with ICS Stunner. Hope NeoBuddy updates it soon.

No real difference with quadrant, I think that was roughly the same as my GB score

oh ........great benchmarks .....why are people obsessed with synethetic benchmarks?

CF Bench 1.2 - Overall score 7601

Richy99 said:
oh ........great benchmarks .....why are people obsessed with synethetic benchmarks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its a geek thing methinks. Tried Quadrant on my Note running stock UK GB just now it got a score of 3977 & 3668 & 3732 which is faster than anything I ever owned...but it still lags like ****.

Quadrant Full Benchmark Results -
Stock GB 2.3.6 - 2684
Current Stock ICS 4.0.3 (German release) - 3445

Antutu?

Castellano2 said:
Antutu?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bungaga
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium

I am getting around 3800 in Quadrant on ICS LiquidSmooth and I was getting about 3200 on official GB.

zen123 said:
Its a geek thing methinks. Tried Quadrant on my Note running stock UK GB just now it got a score of 3977 & 3668 & 3732 which is faster than anything I ever owned...but it still lags like ****.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep my turbo ricer pimped Honda makes 430hp on the dyno but still sucks in the 1/4 mile.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk

Can someone please post a Nenamark 2 and GLBenchmark Egypt or Pro offscreen?
Thank you!

Castellano2 said:
Antutu?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AnTuTu 2.7.3 - 6769

MindBlank said:
Can someone please post a Nenamark 2 and GLBenchmark Egypt or Pro offscreen?
Thank you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GLBenchmark 2.1.4, Egypt 2.1 standard - 46fps (was vsync limited at times)

Can you please try the offscreen bench for Egypt?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA

MindBlank said:
Can you please try the offscreen bench for Egypt?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
60 fps

48 fps on stock GB. Very nice increase of 12 fps. I'm running an OC'ed GPU on GB (400Mhz) and it gives 68 fps. So the increase in case of ICS + 400Mhz GPU would be 85 fps. Can't wait to flash it.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA

straxusii said:
Previously with GB:
Browsermark - 99,857
Sunspider - 1826ms
ICS after this mornings update:
Browsermark - 124,672
Sunspider - 1488ms
Wow, roughly 25% improvement in both
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very, very good scores. These best everything AnandTech has ever benchmarked, with the exception of the Lava XOLO and SGS 3. Absolutely dusts the iPhone 4S, wow.

Overview of Jelly Bean (CM10) on the Galaxy S2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVML6Q1Qid4&feature=plcp

theandroidrooter88 said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVML6Q1Qid4&feature=plcp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Must be in General Section Dont worry MODs ll move it

Prashanthme said:
Must be in General Section Dont worry MODs ll move it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, thanks for fixing it.

Might want to move this to the T-Mobile GS2 forum.

Quadrant scores are too less. That stops me from using any Cyanogen Mod ROMS.
So far only F1 Galaxy Nexus ROM remains unbeatable in Quadrant scores (without overclocking or any other kernel) Scored around 3800 :good:
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD

DD-Ripper said:
Quadrant scores are too less. That stops me from using any Cyanogen Mod ROMS.
So far only F1 Galaxy Nexus ROM remains unbeatable in Quadrant scores (without overclocking or any other kernel) Scored around 3800 :good:
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
High Quadrant scores aren't exactly a reliable standard for a ROM being 'good/bad' or 'slow/fast'. I've used CM10 for a few weeks and over 5 runs in a row Quadrant tested 2754, 2330, 2600, 3100 and 2982...
It's nothing more then a short and fast measurement, and the results aren't consistent at all.
I find daily usage of my phone with a smooth, responsive and reliable ROM far more important then the outcome of a few tests that took 1-2 min....
Sent from my GT-9100

DD-Ripper said:
Quadrant scores are too less. That stops me from using any Cyanogen Mod ROMS.
So far only F1 Galaxy Nexus ROM remains unbeatable in Quadrant scores (without overclocking or any other kernel) Scored around 3800 :good:
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actualled loled at your post. Why do mods let noobs make such lame posts? :S

DD-Ripper said:
Quadrant scores are too less. That stops me from using any Cyanogen Mod ROMS.
So far only F1 Galaxy Nexus ROM remains unbeatable in Quadrant scores (without overclocking or any other kernel) Scored around 3800 :good:
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As the firm says many recognized developers:
However, if you put any trust in Quadrant scores you could use them to prove that dancing naked for 5 minutes in your garden affects device performance. By Chainfire
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good:

DD-Ripper said:
Quadrant scores are too less. That stops me from using any Cyanogen Mod ROMS.
So far only F1 Galaxy Nexus ROM remains unbeatable in Quadrant scores (without overclocking or any other kernel) Scored around 3800 :good:
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think Quadrant scores don't mean much. It doesn't really mirror the user experience fluency. It's pretty much just a number.
Just for the record, I've got the score of 4K on CM9.
Sent from my premium potato

ArmorD said:
I think Quadrant scores don't mean much. It doesn't really mirror the user experience fluency. It's pretty much just a number.
Just for the record, I've got the score of 4K on CM9.
Sent from my premium potato
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it affects gaming performance. I only bought Samsung Galaxy S2 for Gaming purposes not for development n other stuff....
Btw how did u got 4K on CM9..?? You probably must have Siyah or any other kernel and Overclocked ..I scored around 2800 on CM9 on all default settings..Just after I flashed that Rom
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD

DD-Ripper said:
But it affects gaming performance. I only bought Samsung Galaxy S2 for Gaming purposes not for development n other stuff....
Btw how did u got 4K on CM9..?? You probably must have Siyah or any other kernel and Overclocked ..I scored around 2800 on CM9 on all default settings..Just after I flashed that Rom
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A high score during a short test doesn't have anything to do with gaming-performance.
Again: quadrant scores are useless when you're talking about overall performance
Sent from my GT-9100

siedus said:
A high score during a short test doesn't have anything to do with gaming-performance.
Again: quadrant scores are useless when you're talking about overall performance
Sent from my GT-9100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is. If you score less than 3000, heavy games like NOVA 3 gets too much laggy and unplayable (In Multiplayer) unless you over clock.
So I'm not saying that CM10/CM9 is useless, I'm only saying that those ROMS are not good for gaming purposes. You guys are taking my words wrongly.
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD

thats what i found

DD-Ripper said:
It is. If you score less than 3000, heavy games like NOVA 3 gets too much laggy and unplayable (In Multiplayer) unless you over clock.
So I'm not saying that CM10/CM9 is useless, I'm only saying that those ROMS are not good for gaming purposes. You guys are taking my words wrongly.
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not taking your words wrongly, i think you don't understand what i'm trying to explain.
But i think this 'discussion' about quadrant scores is a bit off-topic, so maybe it's wise to end it
Sent from my GT-I9100

Aside from quadrant scores meaning absolutely nothing, it should probably be noted that this video is done on the T-Mobile USA model, the SGH-T989. Which has an inferior chipset/CPU. So of course the scores are low.

S3/S3 LTE benchmark results thread

Allright i didn't find any kind of benchmark threads for S3(/LTE) se here it is. Got this score on my S3 LTE with amcha-rom with cpu oced to 1,6ghz. Going to post AnTuTu score later if this thread gets any posts or so.

Such Name said:
Allright i didn't find any kind of benchmark threads for S3(/LTE) se here it is. Got this score on my S3 LTE with amcha-rom with cpu oced to 1,6ghz. Going to post AnTuTu score later if this thread gets any posts or so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Upgrade your phone to KitKat to get better results..

Such Name said:
Allright i didn't find any kind of benchmark threads for S3(/LTE) .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because benchmarks are a waste of time and don't reflect daily usage

Benchmark Thread

Here we can compare our score
Here is my score on antutu banchmark

MATRIKS said:
Here we can compare our score
Here is my score on antutu banchmark
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
People still do these?

Sent from my LG-H815 using Tapatalk

Dennisg34 said:
People still do these?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. Who gives a damn?

If we're all using the same phone, I'd expect everyone to get similar results unless you throw it in the fridge.

Quadrant standard

48729

50244

Something about 53k in AnTuTu. How did you do up to 65k+?

Hi !
For me as far as i'm concerned, i don't like benchmark,it's useless ...
I habe underclock my 2 big cores (to 960mhz for example) and i prefer to have a better battery life without lagg (for call,sms... facebook...browser...many games .. It's useless to have a performant phone)

kouzelnik3 said:
Something about 53k in AnTuTu. How did you do up to 65k+?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Close all apps, let it cool down, airplane mode it, perhaps changes the kernel governer while we're at it. I hit 69k before

This is my best score.

Antutu benchmark

What is the Best antutu score for note 5
Here is my test score

That's really good; I got 65469
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Don't you have anything installed? I got 45k, all apps closed and bootmanager in action to prevent unwanted apps to startup on boot!

I don't have root just used clean master and greenify app
First run I got 70430

i got 74000+, but you should use PCMARK, as it test the more in more scenarios and kinda replicates your daily usage.
I got enormus score.

how s this? running darthstalker 5 and skyhigh 2.1 undervolted by -100mv and overclocked to 2.4 a57 cores and 852mhz gpu.

That's good I mean very good

Hi,
arter97 lastest beta kernel with Interactive governor tweaked a bit for better performance (enforced_mode set to 1, min_sample_time, go_hispeed_load and hispeed_freq tweaked) and some VM tweaks (dirty_ratio, dirty_background_ratio, dirty_expire_centisecs, dirty_writeback_centisecs and swapiness), no undervolt.
CPU temp at 25 °C at the beginning...

SkyHigh 2.7 kernel, some tweaks like above without overclock / underclock:
I use the previous Antutu version to compare with my other scores when I test some tweaks (as a baseline), it would be time to update Antutu now

My antutu score with antutu 6.0 is about 82k.

m4gg0t said:
My antutu score with antutu 6.0 is about 82k.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i got this using darthstalker 5 and skyhigh 2.7

Not bad, im running all stock. Don't really want to root.

m4gg0t said:
Not bad, im running all stock. Don't really want to root.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as you can see..there are real benefits ) not to mention better battery life and all around usage speed, fluidity...but hey, everybody uses their phone as they want. i m a poweruser...

i have 84089
n920c

junior00027 said:
i have 84089
n920c
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the usual score @ stock rom, kernel is anything from 80.000 to 85.000 so you re perfectly stock with the score

Sent from my SM-N920C using Tapatalk

My first test on Venom Note.
Sent from my SM-N920G using Tapatalk

haree87 said:
Sent from my SM-N920C using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kickoff said:
View attachment 3582674
My first test on Venom Note.
Sent from my SM-N920G using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guys i m sorry to ruin your parade...but any score in red is not a valid one...sorry. When you will get a green score, post that. I could never get above 100.000 green score (max was around 97-98.000 with skyhigh kernel)..the only kernel that gets me over 110.000 is arter kernel and that is known already to have a bug in the UX Section that causes that big score...

score

Every time I'm getting around 80k on stock, which is slightly low i think.
When comparing the stats to the Note 5 at the ranking table its all the same with exception of the 3d score (garden) with my device always getting around 8.3k compared to 12.112 from Note 5 result from the ranking table.
Why do you think my 3d score is low?
Also I don't know if it's related but I have some sort of lag when scrolling through Facebook, YouTube etc...