Microsoft buys Nokia's smartphone handset business - Windows Phone 8 General

Microsoft late Monday announced it is buying Nokia's smartphone and cellular handset business in a deal worth $7.2 billion.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/09/03/microsoft-buys-nokia-handset/2756653/

Yeah this was coming after elop was put in.
Sent from my RM-878_nam_usa_100 using XDA Windows Phone 7 App

Nice. We're gonna have microsoft phones now.

I'm not sure I'm going to like this.... the OS is halfbaked and we have no official ETA for 8.1 nor GDR3, GDR2 adds FM except its not on all devices, and the Lumia hardware line sure better stay the way it is (build quality wise and not dumping features to just ship the devices/updates), or I'm going Android.....
Unless MS attempting to directly compete with Android with the Microsoft editions - direct updates and no shovelware.
Why can't I just find a WP7 device with LTE?
Also, I'm feeling good about Elop being a potential CEO. It would be good for almost all the divisions.

thals1992 said:
I'm not sure I'm going to like this.... the OS is halfbaked and we have no official ETA for 8.1 nor GDR3, GDR2 adds FM except its not on all devices, and the Lumia hardware line sure better stay the way it is (build quality wise and not dumping features to just ship the devices/updates), or I'm going Android.....
Unless MS attempting to directly compete with Android with the Microsoft editions - direct updates and no shovelware.
Why can't I just find a WP7 device with LTE?
Also, I'm feeling good about Elop being a potential CEO. It would be good for almost all the divisions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think microsoft will have any direct say into how the lumia handsets will be, build-quality wise. Their awesome build is what keeps lumia at an advantage against others and i doubt they will dump that.

mcosmin222 said:
I don't think microsoft will have any direct say into how the lumia handsets will be, build-quality wise. Their awesome build is what keeps lumia at an advantage against others and i doubt they will dump that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Microsoft actually stated pretty much what they intend to change in the near future and what they intend to keep the same. Especially the developer evangelism groups, overall marketing, etc. are going to be centralized. The sales team, the design teams, product teams, etc. are all staying the same and also mostly are staying in finland.

thals1992 said:
I'm not sure I'm going to like this.... the OS is halfbaked and we have no official ETA for 8.1 nor GDR3, GDR2 adds FM except its not on all devices, and the Lumia hardware line sure better stay the way it is (build quality wise and not dumping features to just ship the devices/updates), or I'm going Android.....
Unless MS attempting to directly compete with Android with the Microsoft editions - direct updates and no shovelware.
Why can't I just find a WP7 device with LTE?
Also, I'm feeling good about Elop being a potential CEO. It would be good for almost all the divisions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Lumia 900 had LTE. I believe the Focus 2 also had it.

Related

Windows Mobile 7 for HD2, it will happen

Hi,
I have recently received an enquiry about a post I made saying that I contacted HTC about a month ago asking if WinMo 7 will be made available for the HD2, and if it will be a free download. I have found their response so have decided to post it on here:-
"Dear Toby
Thank you for your enquiry about HD2
What we do it ROM Upgrades from our website, however 6.5 windows mobile has only been out 2 months and windows mobile 7 hasn't even been developed. This wont be out until next november at the earliest. But when it is available it will be a free download.
If these steps have not helped, please let me know by responding using the link provided and I will be happy to check again for you.
Best regards,
Terry Snelling
HTC customer support team
HTC Corp. Global Service Division
http://www.htc.com/europe/CA_Hotline.aspx"
When asked to comment on the sayings of a HTC developer who said that WM7 will be available for the HD2 on Twitter, HTC responded "No, disregard that". Should have said "when and if" instead of "when".
So yeah. We're not exactly too sure about what the branches are up to.
It's not like this matters anyway, you'll probably have your share of WM7 roms here in xda.
Yunabeco said:
It's not like this matters anyway, you'll probably have your share of WM7 roms here in xda.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't bet on that. Developing a ROM based on an entirely new CE kernel is a totally different proposition to going to a different version of WM6.x - where are the hardware drivers going to come from?
I doubt it will be a new rom for us. First, its seems its being pushed to q1 2011, second, new phones with dual core processors will come out and it will hurt sales if they offer an upgrade to 7. They need to sell the new phones.
Its just business guys, its not like HTC cares so much about the current hd2 owners. They are in the money making business.
To be fair, lorin.bute is on the money here - I'll probably only have this phone a year at most and there'll be bigger & better around by the time WM7 is out.
That said, if they do release wm7 for hd2, it will a nice thing for them to do
I have doubt there will be any official WM7 release for HD2, just as there is no official WM6.5 for HD.
Shasarak said:
I wouldn't bet on that. Developing a ROM based on an entirely new CE kernel is a totally different proposition to going to a different version of WM6.x - where are the hardware drivers going to come from?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many devices originally running WM5 have 'unofficial' WM6(.5.x) Roms available.
Drivers can be created or taken from devices using the same hardware.
Also, I wouldn't be surprised if WM7 turns out to be able to use 6.x hardware drivers.
If the HD2 continues to be a well sold device, and -not unimportant- the first device that meets the WM7 HW Specs, it could be a logical choice for HTC to come up with an upgrade.
And offcourse it also depends on when WM7 will be available. If it comes out in April, the HD2 may still be HTC's 'flagship'. If it comes out in november, chances are the HD2 is not that fast, big and high tech anymore..
@tomasz
Going from WM6 to WM7 is something completely different than going from WM5 to WM6. WM5 and WM6 share the same kernel (kinda), so it's easy to update, as all the drivers still work. Drivers made for WM6 will not work on WM7.
But HD2 is testing WM7 on the HD2 and it only takes someone to leak a ROM and we'll have all the necessary software to port WM7 to the HD2. So even if HTC doesn't release an official update, I'm pretty sure that we'll get it.
But we definitely can't develop the necessary software ourselves and it's not like the updates from WM5 to WM6, that's where Shasarak is right. All we can do now is wait and see what happens.
tomasz said:
Many devices originally running WM5 have 'unofficial' WM6(.5.x) Roms available.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but Windows Mobile 5.0, 6.0, 6.1 and 6.5 are all based on Windows CE version 5-point-something. (You forget how little development has been going on with Windows Mobile for the past several years - very little has actually changed between 5.0 and 6.5). Going to WM7 we go to a Windows CE version 6 kernel, which is completely different.
tomasz said:
Drivers can be created or taken from devices using the same hardware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What devices are there which have identical hardware to the HD2 and are running WM7? I take the point that there probably will be devices out there with similar hardware running WM7 at some point; but look at the issues people are currently having porting graphics drivers from the Toshiba TG01 to the HD2 (and they really do have virtually identical hardware) - it mostly works, but it's not perfect. And every device onboard needs a driver - not just the main chipset, but things like the camera too. What are the chances a WM7 phone will have an identical camera to the HD2? And where are we going to get a WM7-compatible radio ROM from?
tomasz said:
Also, I wouldn't be surprised if WM7 turns out to be able to use 6.x hardware drivers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's already been announced that it won't.
tomasz said:
If the HD2 continues to be a well sold device, and -not unimportant- the first device that meets the WM7 HW Specs, it could be a logical choice for HTC to come up with an upgrade.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would be a totally illogical choice for an upgrade, because WM7 isn't due out until Q4 this year - likely late Q4 according to some rumours. That means the HD2's successor will probably launch as HTC's first (flagship) WM7 phone. At that point, if HTC issues a WM7 upgrade for the HD2 they will be seriously cannibalising HD3 sales; from HTC's perspective, they want anyone who wishes to upgrade to WM7 to buy a new phone to do it. There was no official WM6.5 upgrade for the Touch HD for the same reason.
freyberry said:
But HD2 is testing WM7 on the HD2 and it only takes someone to leak a ROM and we'll have all the necessary software to port WM7 to the HD2. So even if HTC doesn't release an official update, I'm pretty sure that we'll get it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If HTC are testing WM7 on actual HD2 hardware, then there may indeed be a helpful leak at some point. Do you have a source for that claim, or are you just being optimistic?
by 2011, i think i can upgrade my phone again since it reaching the end of my contract....
Shasarak said:
It would be a totally illogical choice for an upgrade, because WM7 isn't due out until Q4 this year - likely late Q4 according to some rumours. That means the HD2's successor will probably launch as HTC's first (flagship) WM7 phone. At that point, if HTC issues a WM7 upgrade for the HD2 they will be seriously cannibalising HD3 sales; from HTC's perspective, they want anyone who wishes to upgrade to WM7 to buy a new phone to do it. There was no official WM6.5 upgrade for the Touch HD for the same reason.
If HTC are testing WM7 on actual HD2 hardware, then there may indeed be a helpful leak at some point. Do you have a source for that claim, or are you just being optimistic?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, some additions to your points.
I really don't think that a WM7 upgrade would hurt HD3 sales. Would Apple still sell the iPhone 3G if it did hurt 3GS sales? Probably not. If someone wants an HD3, he'll buy an HD3. If someone doesn't want to spend that much, he'll buy a cheaper device, which could then be the HD2 (because it saves HTC some costs of developing new mid-range phones if they continue to sell the last gen devices, just like Apple does). The reason for not providing a WM6.5 upgrade to the Touch HD is that they have to draw a line somewhere. Testing and adjusting new WM versions causes additional costs and they have to decide if it pays (because they give out the upgrade for free, so the "only" thing they get in return is satisfaction of their customers). Yes, I do think that they should have provided WM6.5 for the Touch HD, but apparently they decided that it would not pay. Apple only has to support two last-gen devices, it would be much too expensive for HTC to develop upgrades for all their devices, so they have to choose which ones to support.
About HTC testing WM7 on the HD2: I know that the necessary software exists, but I can't tell you any more than that (and I don't know more than that). Of course I can not guarantee that there will be a leak, I'm just being optimistic about this. Only time will tell if there will be an official upgrade or a leak that we can use, but yes, I am optimistic
snerkler said:
HTC customer support team
HTC Corp. Global Service Division
http://www.htc.com/europe/CA_Hotline.aspx"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't bet a penny on that statement.
All I've read so far about HTC customer support responses (HD2: ROM upgrades, warranty, release datesm..) were vague. One not knowing what the other one said, contradictious statements, etc.
Unless that "confirmation" is not from a "higher positioned" employee, it's not more promising than the russian tweet about the Upgrade.
Maybe I'm a skeptic, but the only thing I believe from that statement is that WM7 is scheduled for release in November. I wouldn't be surpsied if like most CS reps he was a bit confused and didn't realize that MS/HTC is probably going to push out 6.5.3 to the HD.
More than likely 6.5.3 will be released as a free download
WM7 will start appearing in Nov (on new devices though)
And since I've never seen HTC develop 2 OS updates for a device, I don't see it happening now, unless times are changing and that WM7 license is free or something.
Personally I do believe we will get an update from HTC for the HD2 but I dont think it will be when WM7 launches or anytime soon after that. I hope I am wrong but if WM7 is as good as we hope and erases the ghosts of previous WinMo iterations then we will see an influx of new Handsets from most of the manufacturers. Leaving little time for the HD2...until the dust settles that it is...
Just my opinion mind you, I am thoroughly expecting to be wrong on this...
I'd say Windows 7 is being tested on the HD2 right now.
http://pocketnow.com/tech-news/microsoft-implies-windows-mobile-7-headed-to-htc-hd2
freyberry said:
OK, some additions to your points.
I really don't think that a WM7 upgrade would hurt HD3 sales. Would Apple still sell the iPhone 3G if it did hurt 3GS sales? Probably not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The critical difference there is that the iPhone 3G is still an active product: Apple is still making and selling them. (Though you'll note that they discontinued the 16GB version of the 3G as soon as the 3GS launched for precisely that reason - so as to avoid hurting 3GS sales by competing with it).
HTC doesn't operate like that. They have well-defined market sectors, and when a new device comes out in any one sector, the old one is retired and production ceases. Consider, for example, the Touch Diamond, Touch Pro and Touch HD - once the TD2, TP2 and HD2 came out, each of those replaced the earlier model, and the earlier version immediately ceased production. They didn't keep the old Touch HD going as a cheap version of the HD2; that role is fulfilled by the TD2.
Very few manufacturers offer any sort of ongoing development for phone models which aren't being made any more, and HTC is no exception: once the HD2 is no longer being made and sold, we won't see any more major updates for it. For so long as it remains in production, we may.
So the question is simply whether WM7 will become available before or after the HD2 ceases production. If it comes out several months before, there's a good chance of a port (because not offering it would hurt HD2 sales in the mean time). If it comes out after the HD2 isn't being sold any more, there is no chance. And all the precedents suggest that they will stop making HD2's as soon as a replacement model comes out, and that the replacement will likely appear about a year after the model it replaces - which is round about the time WM7 is expected to launch.
Even if you ignore HTC's history of model replacement, it's still very unlikely that the HD2 will remain in production after a new flagship model is released. The iPhone 3G and 3GS can coexist because there's such a large gap between the two in hardware terms (in the same way as there is between the HD2 and the TD2). But it's doubtful that the HD3 hardware will actually be that far ahead of the HD2. (Look how long HTC stuck with MSM72XX chipsets before moving to Snapdragon; it'll likely be a while before they move on from Snapdragon to anything faster). The fact that the HD3 has WM7 will quite likely be the primary thing that differentiates it from the HD2; giving existing HD2 owners access to WM7 would eliminate all motivation for upgrading. There's no way HTC will do that.
I paste also here my comment:
Well, HTC can motivate consumers to buy new devices end of 2010 in 2 ways - by not upgrading existing to WM7 and offering it only with the new devices, or by offering new devices with much faster hardware, which will be an incentive on its own. I am not sure which option HTC will choose though ... having in mind how the competition will upgrade the hardware soon (Apple, Motorola) I think HTC will be forced to do the same as well (and for good)
What I am sure about is that currently MS is testing WM7 on HD2. I hope that at least this version leaks out inofficially
Windows 7 mobile is already in leak..
http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/17/early-windows-mobile-7-build-given-some-hands-on-time-incompati/
mickfarr said:
I'd say Windows 7 is being tested on the HD2 right now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, WM6.5 has been tested also on Xperia X1 and finally there didn't come any update. I think that it is normal that the developers test it on phones that are able to work with the new OS, but it doesn't mean that HD2 will definetly get an official update - though I pray for it...
imperiallight said:
Windows 7 mobile is already in leak..
http://www.engadget.com/2010/01/17/early-windows-mobile-7-build-given-some-hands-on-time-incompati/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.mobiletechworld.com/2010/01/17/windows-mobile-7-rumors-getting-out-of-hand/
Certainly not the most reputable source... I would say... also doesn't seem to be a very educated one either.

Windows Mobile 6.6 to launch in Februari

Source: http://www.engadget.com/
Windows Mobile 6.6 (aka 'not Windows Mobile 7') set for February release?
The sometimes-believable, sometimes-not fellows over at DigiTimes are reporting today that Windows Mobile codename "Maldives" is going to break out as version 6.6 (a name we'd previously heard associated with version 7) with native support for capacitive touchscreens next month -- a launch window that would line up nicely with Mobile World Congress, where 6.5 was announced a year prior. HTC's HD2 has already proven that it's possible to cleanly support capacitive touch on a 6.x-based device, so it's reasonable to think that this is legit -- but what we don't yet know is how this dovetails with 6.5.3, whether they're the same thing, and if Microsoft is doing this simply to buy itself a few precious extra months to bake WinMo 7 to a crispy, golden brown perfection. We'd already heard before that 6.x and 7 will have an opportunity to coexist in the marketplace, so it's entirely possible that 6.6 is the version that'll carry that torch on the 6.x side of things -- but if this gets announced alone without a mention of Robbie's ground-up rewrite at MWC, we'd wager there'll be riots in Barcelona.
Tuurtje
It looks to me like an official name for builds 6.5.x. It may have something like OS 29000 with more bug fixes but it shouldn't be much different from what we have now. (in my opinion)
Tuurtje said:
Source: http://www.engadget.com/
Windows Mobile 6.6 (aka 'not Windows Mobile 7') set for February release?
The sometimes-believable, sometimes-not fellows over at DigiTimes are reporting today that Windows Mobile codename "Maldives" is going to break out as version 6.6 (a name we'd previously heard associated with version 7) with native support for capacitive touchscreens next month -- a launch window that would line up nicely with Mobile World Congress, where 6.5 was announced a year prior. HTC's HD2 has already proven that it's possible to cleanly support capacitive touch on a 6.x-based device, so it's reasonable to think that this is legit -- but what we don't yet know is how this dovetails with 6.5.3, whether they're the same thing, and if Microsoft is doing this simply to buy itself a few precious extra months to bake WinMo 7 to a crispy, golden brown perfection. We'd already heard before that 6.x and 7 will have an opportunity to coexist in the marketplace, so it's entirely possible that 6.6 is the version that'll carry that torch on the 6.x side of things -- but if this gets announced alone without a mention of Robbie's ground-up rewrite at MWC, we'd wager there'll be riots in Barcelona.
Tuurtje
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, saw that. I bit disappointed in also reading that WM7 will be delayed further into the next following year. You can tell Microsoft is fighting for their life to stay above water as this is there last life saver.
WM6.6 probably doesn't exist. Digitimes mentions 'Maldives', which is actually WM6.5.X.
if Windows Mobile 7 is going to come 2011, then Microsoft should just stop developing and concentrate on other stuff and not waste our time...
WTF
[email protected] said:
if Windows Mobile 7 is going to come 2011, then Microsoft should just stop developing and concentrate on other stuff and not waste our time...
WTF
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For someone who is a senior member thats such a childish and immature thing to say!
Windows Mobile Placeholder
This will be a great session about developing for Windows Mobile, but we can’t disclose any details until after MIX keynotes. Check this abstract after MIX keynote for additional details about this session.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:g2YKVUZs_MAJ:live.visitmix.com/Sessions/CL01
^is that? really?
winmo 7 was supposed to come LAST year and now its supposed to come NEXT year...2 years delay? are you serious?
Really, how are they going to catch up? Android and iPhone OS are going to run away with huge market share and if that happens, then nobody is going to support microsoft's platform which means those loyal winmo customers like me and you will have to jump off the band wagon.
It would be a huge bummer if thats really true.
Nah....WM7 will come this year. WM6.6 will coexist with WM7 for the "not-so-powerfull" devices.
I don't believe a thing until we're told it from the horses mouth..
Winmo7 is supposed to be launched at MWC
6.6 is more likely to be a rollout upgrade..
neither of which is confirmed till we hear it from MS.. there's so many rumours going around, and that's all they are. Rumours..
any news??
Has anyone heard anything about HTC releasing version 6.6 ROM any time soon?? Last month eta was February, hopefully that is still unchanged?
If anyone has any news, please post it!
Thanks!
[email protected] said:
^is that? really?
winmo 7 was supposed to come LAST year and now its supposed to come NEXT year...2 years delay? are you serious?
Really, how are they going to catch up? Android and iPhone OS are going to run away with huge market share and if that happens, then nobody is going to support microsoft's platform which means those loyal winmo customers like me and you will have to jump off the band wagon.
It would be a huge bummer if thats really true.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cause maybe they afraid too suck's one time again !!
But this thread isn't in right place !!!
As much as I hate to admit it, I have to agree. By the time WP7 is here, Android and iPhone OS will have seen major advances, which will put MS in the position of playing "catch up" again in the mobile market.
I am amazed that a company with such a vast market share in other arenas, and huge amount of resources cannot actually deliver a product on time, or anywhere even close to the time schedule they set for themselves.
Of course, it could happen, and WP7 could actually be released, but then... I'd rather that they waited to release a functional product and not release it just to say they did, as has been there response to such situations in the past.
The overall strategy puzzles me, really.
I'd like to see 6.6, but I hate the new bottom button focus that it 6.5.x has developed with a passion, so I can only imagine it will be more of the same. The bottom buttons, and double home screen clocks destroy the esthetic of HTC Sense, IMO.

Maybe there should be a class action lawsuit

I read on Twitter about a report that some Samsung Behold II owners are thinking of suing the manufacturer for failure to upgrade their Android phones.
I think the issue is deeper. It has to do with ALL manufacturers and phone company providers. They ALL seem to have a different view as to when to upgrade the phones even after Google provided them for free. Can you imagine if your PC's Window updates are being delayed because HP, Dell, Sony etc have decided to further customize whatever Microsoft did?
If the manufacturers and telcos are unwilling to provide updates, maybe the distribution model should be changed. In the same way that Microsoft charges for a new upgrade (Windows XP - Windows ??? - Windows 7). How about if Google charges, lets say $5 and you can upgrade via the market (cupcake - donut - Eclair - Floyo).
See this article about Samsung owners: http://androidoperatingsystem.net/2010/05/27/samsung-behold-ii-owners-consider-legal-action-over-lack-of-android-2-x-upgrade/
I agree, 'open source' isn't so open. we are locked out of what we can do with the software when the software is suppose to be free and open. I had always thought it was still odd.
The X10 is doing exactly what was advertised by Sony Ericsson. We can be angry for inexistent software updates, but the X10 was advertised with 1.6. Open source does mean nothing. SE has released the full source for the kernel, so they have fully complied to the GPL license. Absolutely no room for lawsuits IMHO.
actually its true.
they are trying to prevent advancement of the Android OS.
with all the technology ..dont tell me they cant release a goddamn update for a mobile OS.
they dont want Android competing with their other products...coz android is so much powerful
Are you high? Drunk?
Since when was truthfully advertising a product's abilities something worthy of a lawsuit?
SE advertised the phone as coming with 1.6. They also promised an update to 2.1 in Q4 2010. What is it now? Q2 2010. How in the **** is someone going to get angry that they don't release something earlier than what they said? There's absolutely no laws being broken. SE doesn't even have to update the phone! There's no legally binding agreement that says they have to or will.
Y'all need a serious reality check.
And really, what does 2.1 do that you can't do in 1.6? Even 2.2 for that matter? Because that matters so much on a cell phone. The phone may become faster, it may not. The phone is exactly as advertised on every single video, picture, and text that SE has released, so I'm not disappointed.
MOD EDIT - Removed vulgarity
There are some nice app I can't use because of not being on 2.X : pdaNet tether via bluetooth for exemple.
iead1 said:
Are you high? Drunk?
Since when was truthfully advertising a product's abilities something worthy of a lawsuit? (MOD EDIT - Vulgarity removed)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do you need to come to insults. Did I write anything in my original post that I wasn't happy as it is now. My opinion has to do with the way manufacturers and telcos view the OS, which is a little bit different than what Google does. Otherwise, Google would not have done what it did for 2.2, make future OS updates independent of what the manufacturer does.
From my own experience with the Rogers Magic, it took almost a revolt from the subscribers before HTC and Rogers promised an update to 2.1.
Please read the link regarding the Samsung. Sometimes, manufacturers need to be pressed to keep their promises. I have been reading about SE. While I am currently happy with the X10a, I also read that SE has a history of not fulfilling their promises (aka X1 Windows mobile updates). But that was not the point of my original post. My point is that ALL manufacturers and telcos should be held accountable for future updates, not just out of their good will, but as a requirement.
I do expect an apology from you for the insulting way you wrote your response.
[PS to moderator: Please review and decide]
so you want to sue them because they don't hold the same attitude towards Open-source software, that Google does?
I agree with iead1. calm down, nobody is obligated to provide you with a new version of an Operating system. They arent even obligated to fix bugs, unless it interferes with a feature that they clearly advertised.
MOD EDIT - Abusive language removed
I agree with the above, the phone does much more than any other phone I've ever had, it does everything better and faster.
2.1/2 would be good and I am sure they will come eventually. But I seriously don't see enough benefits from what my phone does at the moment to justify all the anger seen on this forum in the past couple of weeks.
As said above, the phone does exactly what was advertised and more.
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
the new american dream - sue everything and everyone.
P
Are you high? Drunk?
Y'all need a serious reality check.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Comedy gold. I second that. Theres nothing illegal on se part. TheY ARE just behind becuse of the custom UI wich you payed for.
I just wanted root
-------------------------------------
Sent from my X10a
arcticreaver said:
the new american dream - sue everything and everyone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes we can ...
Oh well, in fact yes you can

[OFFTOPIC] nokia and microsoft get engaged....

Ah bless. It should eventually produce some truly boring phones. Nokia should have gone android IMO? We will have to wait a long time for a Nokia Nexus N!
If that means they drop Meego, they can have a kick in the nuts from me!!!!
If not i forgive them
jamiemac1977 said:
If that means they drop Meego, they can have a kick in the nuts from me!!!!
If not i forgive them
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Symbian and meego are to be 'sidelined' according to BBC news so a swift kick to the nuts is in order. They putting all their chips on MS.....what an exciting partnership. I am sure apple are already living in fear
I don't get it.
I think Microsoft is a mistake, but if it works out it will benefit both sides.
It will be interesting to see what this will yield.
On another Note I see Meego can run Dalvik Turbo.
It seems to be something similar to Wine for linux, but for Android on Meego.
Basically you can run Android apps seamlessly on Meego.
I want to post link but I can't yet. So the Source is Linuxfordevices.com
Title is: "Dalvik ported to MeeGo, promising instant Android app compatibility"
With this development, I think they should have stuck to what they were doing, and made a deal with google to allow Android Market on their Meego Phones.
I understand there would be some sort of premium for them to do that, but damn that would be awesome, it might have killed android.
As much as I love Maemo for it's Multitasking capabilities, I don't like the provided Market on it. Not to mention Qt for Meego.
I hope they still release a Meego device.
Peace.
IronSingh
This is going to be interesting
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
This decision definitively benefits Microsoft more than Nokia. MSFT gets a great handset maker with international market. Nokia gets.... a new OS. I think Android would have definitively been a better choice.
I just think this partnership will produce some very dull devices that are locked down to the extreme. Now if they put some good Xbox functionality in a device.....that might be interesting.
willcpfc said:
Ah bless. It should eventually produce some truly boring phones. Nokia should have gone android IMO? We will have to wait a long time for a Nokia Nexus N!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah after i saw the news this morning i was like
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/11/us-nokia-elop-idUSTRE71A2T820110211
Nokia may you rest in peace
1979 - 2011
AllGamer said:
Yeah after i saw the news this morning i was like
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/11/us-nokia-elop-idUSTRE71A2T820110211
Nokia may you rest in peace
1979 - 2011
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL I cannot pretend I will miss them while they rest in peace...its been a long time since I thought "Damn I wish I had that Nokia"
I disagree entirely (having come from an n900 to a Nexus s just one week ago).
I hope for great things on the Nokia experimental side, and will be rooting for Meego in any form factor..
Win Mobile looks OK, but it's not my kinda thing, i would rather Android/Meego/Maemo anyday!
Symbian was good in it's day, it's just a bit "old hat" ...it for me is hard to fathom how they could make that maemo device and then stick with symbian as a main platform, lost respect from me for that alone!
I hope to see them thrive though, even if i will not buy the win7 devices, ALL mobile companies (inc. google) could do with the kick up the arse that comes from competition, any competition, is good for us all i say!
nyway .. ramble over ....out with the meego allready!!
the only thing i want to see RIP, is fanboi's ...they suck (from apple or android, or any other brand)
willcpfc said:
I just think this partnership will produce some very dull devices that are locked down to the extreme. Now if they put some good Xbox functionality in a device.....that might be interesting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I look at it this way:
When the iPhone was released it was absolutely, bar-none the best, easiest-to-use, most powerful smartphone on the market. It offered a device that anyone could jump into and use without much of a learning curve and as a result it gained a huge amount of market share. When the G1 launched it brought open-source and entirely different UI that allowed users to truly customize their phone experience. It took Google a bit longer but then started to take away from Apple's dominance. Now we have WP7 and I ask myself, what new or interesting features does it bring? You can't copy and paste, you can't customize it, you can't even add storage and the UI is basic and bland. I guess its sort of cool that it has the XBox live support, but that would only be a cool feature to XBox owners and I sold my XBox to get a PS3 because I was tired of paying Microsoft just to watch Netflix which I was already paying to watch. Besides, what is WP7 except Kin with a little more power? And I'm sure I don't need to explain how that worked out.
So to continue my line of thinking, Nokia made the wrong choice. I've seen no real sales figures on WP7 and I know one person who owns one and he happens to work for Microsoft. Actually, my sister's boyfriend who also works for Microsoft owns a Droid X so not even all their employees believe in the platform. Nokia is continuing its history of hitching itself to a wagon with a broken wheel. I was looking forward to Nokia Android devices but I won't lose any sleep over the loss and I won't lose any when they announce bankruptcy in a few months or years.
even the iPhones needs to accommodate the competition now
News: Apple Is Said to Work on Cheaper, Smaller IPhones
Nokia would have been way better off with Android
To us not in the Nokia boardroom it does seem a strange partnership. I mean we could all have told them that apple is king for most 'casual' phone users with android gaining general recognition and acceptance to. MS windows I really don't think will generate any excitement among the masses. Kev is right....what will they bring to the party? I guess accountants in crisp suits may be attracted to a windows device but would many under 25's be interested in MS office for mobile 2011?
willcpfc said:
To us not in the Nokia boardroom it does seem a strange partnership. I mean we could all have told them that apple is king for most 'casual' phone users with android gaining general recognition and acceptance to. MS windows I really don't think will generate any excitement among the masses. Kev is right....what will they bring to the party? I guess accountants in crisp suits may be attracted to a windows device but would many under 25's be interested in MS office for mobile 2011?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol agreed but my name is Ken not Kevin kenvan is my first and last name pushed together hehe
Sent from my SubCyan CM7 Google Nexus S!
Nokia's CEO(?) isn't going to eat his own words and use Android. That isn't the world we live in. Although I'm curious to see what they can bring to the table. I remember Nokia used to bring out some awesome phones, but now it's just either Android phones or Apple's iPhone that gets everyones attention.
DKYang said:
Nokia's CEO(?) isn't going to eat his own words and use Android. That isn't the world we live in. Although I'm curious to see what they can bring to the table. I remember Nokia used to bring out some awesome phones, but now it's just either Android phones or Apple's iPhone that gets everyones attention.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But they have a new CEO who isn't the one who made the Android is like pissing yourself to stay warm comment. And you can't just say its just Android phones, because as a result of Android, the playing field has been leveled. People get excited over Motorola phones the same as LG or HTC or Samsung or any other brand.
I am glad Nokia picked Microsoft.
Really, this is the best outcome for us, Android users.
Why?
Because this will trigger more competition, which will result more innovation from Google Android and Apple iOS (major players on smartphone. No RIM is not )
Believe me, you should be thankful to Nokia and Microsoft.
gogol said:
I am glad Nokia picked Microsoft.
Really, this is the best outcome for us, Android users.
Why?
Because this will trigger more competition, which will result more innovation from Google Android and Apple iOS (major players on smartphone. No RIM is not )
Believe me, you should be thankful to Nokia and Microsoft.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think Microsoft is much competition to either iOS or Android and I don't think either side sees them as such. Their market share, last I saw, was pathetic at best. I would prefer there was more hardware competition than software and another manufacturer pushing out high end hardware would have been just that.
kenvan19 said:
I don't think Microsoft is much competition to either iOS or Android and I don't think either side sees them as such. Their market share, last I saw, was pathetic at best. I would prefer there was more hardware competition than software and another manufacturer pushing out high end hardware would have been just that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly, i was really hoping to see some Nokia with Android love, but the moment they selected Microsoft... all hopes were gone.
I used to be a big Nokia fan, they always had the best hardware.
My apologies Ken I typed in haste. It certainly seems that poor Nokia has not inspired much enthusiasm. I am pleased not to own any Nokia shares...MS wont suffer half as much IF this strategy fails.

Google acquires Motorola Mobility

http://investor.google.com/releases/2011/0815.html
Game changer? Thoughts as to what it means for us xoomers?
I was coming to post this as well.. Friggin sweet... The true Google device..
dubsjw27 said:
http://investor.google.com/releases/2011/0815.html
Game changer? Thoughts as to what it means for us xoomers?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow. This one is being reported all across the interwebs at the moment.
First of all if I were HTC and Samsung I would be LIVID right now. Both companies have stacked a lot of chips on Android and may now be seeing that as not as sure a bet as they thought. It would make sense for Google to now keep its flagship devices "in house" and have them made by Moto Mobile. This is going to freeze both companies out of the plum position of producing the concept devices for each new version of Android.
What does this foretell for the future? First of all I would not be surprised to see both HTC and Samsung trying to repair connections with Microsoft, and looking again at making a larger commitment to Windows Phone 7.
For we Xoom users, it heavily improves the odds of us seeing an official ICS release by the end of the year. That was already likely since the Xoom was being used to demo the software, but now will be even more so.
Interesting days ahead.
It gives me a little more confidence that the xoom won't be left behind as quickly as we all thought it would be.
Great move for all Android partners
If anything, this protects HTC and Samsung's Android business from patents claims against them. Google will use it's new patent muscle as a deterrent. Google stated Motorola will be a licensee just like the others. I'm sure all new GED's will be Moto but I doubt the influence will extend much beyond that.
Well, I want this:
Motorola has a lot of patents on mobile / smartphone technology.
So, I want Google to use those patents to protect Android!
I don't know how ... but I dreamed this to shut up that Apple patent troll.
Probably, Google intention was mainly for Motorola patents.
linuxdood said:
If anything, this protects HTC and Samsung's Android business from patents claims against them. Google will use it's new patent muscle as a deterrent. Google stated Motorola will be a licensee just like the others. I'm sure all new GED's will be Moto but I doubt the influence will extend much beyond that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree that this is a good move in the long-term for Android as a platform...but I think you underestimate the influence that being the sole source of GEDs will give Moto. They will be the glass of fashion.
Google will continue to provide the software to all it's partners, sure...but I think we are coming up very swiftly on a new synthesis of hardware and software...basically the Apple model accepted as the norm. Apple vs Google/Moto vs Microsoft/Nokia.
My question now is...who buys RIM. My guess is Microsoft.
Well, my day just got better.
Google has been outspoken about unlockable bootloaders. Could this mean all upcoming Google/Motorola devices will be fully unlockable?
Moto blur is now officially killed
How sweet ...
UPDATE:
So, the purchase is to defend Android ...
Update: More quotes from Android partners after the break.
Peter Chou, CEO, HTC:
We welcome the news of today's acquisition, which demonstrates that Google is deeply committed to defending Android, its partners, and the entire ecosystem.
Bert Nordberg, President & CEO, Sony Ericsson:
I welcome Google's commitment to defending Android and its partners.
Jong-Seok Park, President & CEO, LG:
We welcome Google's commitment to defending Android and its partners.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe they will purchase htc, samsung, etc.....
I expect this kind of news in the future:
GOOGLE is suing Apple for some (Motorola) patents infringement.
Then in negotiation:
Apple: So, what's now? How do we settle?
Google: Easy, drop all your lousy law suits on Android manufacturers
That would be epic!
armychris28210 said:
Maybe they will purchase htc, samsung, etc.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes! And then they will concentrate on one phone, to make it perfect with all their new know how. To enhance the security they get rid of the open source ****, and make it perfectly usable and easy by integrating it to Google Music as the only way to put music on the device. It will be called the GPhone and it will...ohhh...wait...
gogol said:
UPDATE:
So, the purchase is to defend Android ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well it certainly is, at least partially. Patents are the big deal these days.
However, as for the parts of the deal that are about getting an in house hardware maker being downplayed...what else are the brass of HTC, Sony Ericsson and LG going to say?
It reminds me of the losers on The Bachelor "He totally like made the right choice...I really think this is for the best and hope they will be very happy...."
We will see how they really feel if the announcements of additional WM7 phones start picking up speed.
>First of all if I were HTC and Samsung I would be LIVID right now.
Co-opetition is the nature of business (and a lot of other areas). Things are always more complicated than the black-or-white, friend-or-foe picture people try to paint. MS is in with Nokia, but other co's are still making WP7 phones. It all depends on what makes sense (read: profit).
That the deal happens is not because of Moto Mobo's hardware capability, but for its patent portfolio.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903392904576509953821437960.html
>It would make sense for Google to now keep its flagship devices "in house" and have them made by Moto Mobile.
No, it doesn't. That would go against everything that it has built Android to be, which is an "open", device- (and vendor-) agnostic OS. If it wants to destroy Android, that would be the surest way to go about it.
>For we Xoom users, it heavily improves the odds of us seeing an official ICS release by the end of the year.
I don't see it changes the picture any wrt the Xoom. As a GED device (for US model), the odds were always in favor of Xoom getting official ICS--and for most Teg2 tabs from major vendors, for that matter.
The acquisition will take place over some months, long after the Xoom has come and gone. I don't see Moto getting any "nicer" with supporting the Xoom just because it will be part of Goog. The Xoom is just one of many Moto products, and its replacements are already in the pipe.
e.mote said:
No, it doesn't. That would go against everything that it has built Android to be, which is an "open", device- (and vendor-) agnostic OS. If it wants to destroy Android, that would be the surest way to go about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is not completely accurate. Google has always selected one vendor for each version to develop the flagship GED device. The vendors have competed heavily to get those contracts since they involved a lot of interaction with the software design team and a leg up on smooth integration.
Now, it will make sense for Moto to have those prototype devices, as it means that Google will be able to control the process even further.
Android is vendor-agnostic, but each version has always had one vendor who was first amongst equals...and that will now be Moto.
RonnieFoxxx said:
Google has been outspoken about unlockable bootloaders. Could this mean all upcoming Google/Motorola devices will be fully unlockable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unlocked, not unlockable!
>Now, it will make sense for Moto to have those prototype devices, as it means that Google will be able to control the process even further.
I don't see this as a big deal. Having the Xoom released first didn't help Moto any wrt to sales, nor was having a GED a benefit to the user experience. Xoom users do get updates a bit faster, but other devices have value-added functionality (eg SD card, Splashtop, etc) that the Xoom lacks, OOB.
As far as "controlling the experience," that remains to be seen. It's hard to say with this 1st-gen as a gauge, as HC has been an ongoing beta for ICS. We'll have to see what Goog will do with its newly acquired hardware arm. I think it should be emphasized that the acquisition is more to shore up its patent stash than to "control the Android experience." Goog's failed 6.5B attempt to acquire Nortel's patents is indicative of its need in this area.
rschenck said:
Wow. This one is being reported all across the interwebs at the moment.
First of all if I were HTC and Samsung I would be LIVID right now. Both companies have stacked a lot of chips on Android and may now be seeing that as not as sure a bet as they thought. It would make sense for Google to now keep its flagship devices "in house" and have them made by Moto Mobile. This is going to freeze both companies out of the plum position of producing the concept devices for each new version of Android.
What does this foretell for the future? First of all I would not be surprised to see both HTC and Samsung trying to repair connections with Microsoft, and looking again at making a larger commitment to Windows Phone 7.
For we Xoom users, it heavily improves the odds of us seeing an official ICS release by the end of the year. That was already likely since the Xoom was being used to demo the software, but now will be even more so.
Interesting days ahead.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't be silly, android is an open source project device manufacturers will still be able to put their customizations out and will still be shipping phones with old versions of android. This deal will have no impact on android device manufacturers other then patent protection
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk

Categories

Resources