So guys, do you think we will ever get the MIUI Rom for out lovely gt-i9500......or does it need an aosp like cm to be able to run because cm will eventually become stable which means we can get the Rom....no?
I saw a thread about this a few days ago, and the general opinion was that we need to have a stable aosp rom before we can think about getting miui.
I'll post the link to the thread when I find it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Found it! Check this thread
Ya, well thats what im saying, if we get stable cm10.2 will we be able to get it
cm10.2`
but now cm10.2 for i9500 is already out.
now what's the problem porting miui rom to i9500??
munmun said:
but now cm10.2 for i9500 is already out.
now what's the problem porting miui rom to i9500??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not stable yet....needs more tweaking
Related
Being a total Android n00b, I just finished converting my SE X10 mini pro from stock to MiniCM-2.1.9+ nAa-11 kernel, and now I want to go on taking care of my ZTE Blade, but as far as I have seen by now, development for the ZTE Blade is quite different.
The official stable CM7 seems to be stuck at 7.1.0 since autumn, somewhere it was mentioned that nightlies have been discontinued, I could not find any info on kernel development, and progress only goes on with builds called KANGs?
Has official CM7 development shifted to CM9 only?
Can someone explain please, what KANG means?
Which CM 7.2 KANG is the current recommendation (I read about targetBSP, BurgerZ, burstlam and sej7278) and what are the differences?
You can say these as unofficial nightlies built by other people with their own small modifications but with all the official CM updates.
The names you mentioned are the one who built them
The one that i found fastest was the burstlam build but they're all pretty similar....except..targetbsp's version is more like a vanilla version meaning using all official cm updates only no extra mods etc. s
CM7 is still being developed, the only thing that stopped were the nightly builds, think it was hd failure on the server or something. CyanogenMod recently took donations for new servers, so they should be back up & running soon.
KANGs are just versions built from CM7 source, but not by CyanogenMod. There isn't much real development going on with them. They're just more recent because the CM7 nightly builds stopped months ago.
wbaw said:
CM7 is still being developed, the only thing that stopped were the nightly builds, think it was hd failure on the server or something. CyanogenMod recently took donations for new servers, so they should be back up & running soon.
KANGs are just versions built from CM7 source, but not by CyanogenMod. There isn't much real development going on with them. They're just more recent because the CM7 nightly builds stopped months ago.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
great information included in this post had no idea that the cyanogen servers had some problems thanks for the information mate
Master One said:
Being a total Android n00b, I just finished converting my SE X10 mini pro from stock to MiniCM-2.1.9+ nAa-11 kernel, and now I want to go on taking care of my ZTE Blade, but as far as I have seen by now, development for the ZTE Blade is quite different.
The official stable CM7 seems to be stuck at 7.1.0 since autumn, somewhere it was mentioned that nightlies have been discontinued, I could not find any info on kernel development, and progress only goes on with builds called KANGs?
Has official CM7 development shifted to CM9 only?
Can someone explain please, what KANG means?
Which CM 7.2 KANG is the current recommendation (I read about targetBSP, BurgerZ, burstlam and sej7278) and what are the differences?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go for Burstlam's build. Has good options for UI customisation and also has lesser battery consumption.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2263727
Can you porting this Rom for U8800 (not pro)? I can't do this, my phone is bricking now, please
season 8 said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2263727
Can you porting this Rom for U8800 (not pro)? I can't do this, my phone is bricking now, please
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi!
I would love to port the rom for you, but I think you should wait until our CM10.1 matures a bit more. Because when you port the rom with our current CM10.1, then the ported rom will also have the same problems. If you want, I can port it for you right now, but you will have to fix the bugs yourself.
Please let me know what you want.
Thanks.
Thanks!
rqmok said:
Hi!
I would love to port the rom for you, but I think you should wait until our CM10.1 matures a bit more. Because when you port the rom with our current CM10.1, then the ported rom will also have the same problems. If you want, I can port it for you right now, but you will have to fix the bugs yourself.
Please let me know what you want.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
'Cause I love paranoid setings in this ROM, but I don't know how to add it to ilyaaa299's CM10.1 ROM.
It'll be great if someone adds it to ilyaaa299's rom, thanks all
If you want to port this ROM just say to some of my team member and we will port, that ROM is protected and is owned by Taurus Team.
Is possible to port PACman ROM for U8800(not pro) ?
Sorry for my bad English
Thanks.
Ax1qwer said:
Is possible to port PACman ROM for U8800(not pro) ?
Sorry for my bad English
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya. I think it has fixed wifi thanks to dzo. Port would be easy.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T769.
Hello friends.
As all of us see, LG released their KitKat sources long time ago. Our great developers like @dr87 @Savoca @houstonn and others made it with Their hard work to merge them so we have two stable / nearly stable roms: Mahdi and PA. But what with other roms? Most of the roms are based on CM, so they still have bugs.. During months, CM doesn't seem to have done ANYTHING.
So my question is, how about to send a message (or spam, in any way u name it) by all of us to CM, to the maintainer? We have official support, but in fact it's "support without support" in my opinion. Maybe after these messages they would finally start to do something, because it's like they forgot about G2...
Regards.
EDIT: so we have a way to contact => https://jira.cyanogenmod.org/secure/Dashboard.jspa
now we should make a well, polite message so everyone would copy it and drop there.
Another way it would be to ask the maintainer directly https://plus.google.com/+RicardoCerqueira
EDIT2: I gave a comment to Ricardo on Google+ here https://plus.google.com/+RicardoCerqueira/posts/4dc8kVBYuTq feel free to do it as well
The best bet would be to create an improvement note at their so called "Bug Tracker" considering that they are doing this for free, this would be the most polite form.
I support this initiative, but today be entirely honest M6 for me is almost bug free, fast and battery efficient.
Up to date sources is great, but if a rom is working well, I don't care if the sources are old!
Inviato dal mio LG-D802 utilizzando Tapatalk
Airidas said:
The best bet would be to create an improvement note at their so called "Bug Tracker" considering that they are doing this for free, this would be the most polite form.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
could u give a link please? so we could prepare a message and then everyone would leave it there
vittogn said:
I support this initiative, but today be entirely honest M6 for me is almost bug free, fast and battery efficient.
Up to date sources is great, but if a rom is working well, I don't care if the sources are old!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I personally had CM for some time, and it never was so stable as Mahdi R1 which i have now. Besides that, a lot of roms like Carbon or Slim can't be simply updated from CM sources, so they still have bugs.
reas0n said:
could u give a link please? so we could prepare a message and then everyone would leave it there
I personally had CM for some time, and it never was so stable as Mahdi R1 which i have now. Besides that, a lot of roms like Carbon or Slim can't be simply updated from CM sources, so they still have bugs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here: jira.cyanogenmod.org
Thanks, so anyone is, i would say, good in kind speaking to prepare a message?
Oh and we could also use Google+ and ask the maintainer directly https://plus.google.com/+RicardoCerqueira
Replyed 2 times to posts in his google + account with message " When LG G2 is going to have updated KK sources? A lot of people are waiting for bug-free CM and CM-based 4.4 ROMs ". I hope that all you guys do the same.Cheers
Sent from my LG-D802 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Just to clarify, roms that are based on CM do not need CM to upgrade to 4.4.2 sources. The upgrade is done in the device tree / vendor files and kernel. The rom source does not need any changes and each rom maintainer for the G2 has the power to upgrade their rom to 4.4.2 G2 sources without CM doing anything, they just need to figure out the specific device tree bugs for each rom and fix them.
I am under the impression you think CM needs to upgrade in order for CM based roms to upgrade, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong :good:
dr87 said:
Just to clarify, roms that are based on CM do not need CM to upgrade to 4.4.2 sources. The upgrade is done in the device tree / vendor files and kernel. The rom source does not need any changes and each rom maintainer for the G2 has the power to upgrade their rom to 4.4.2 G2 sources without CM doing anything, they just need to figure out the specific device tree bugs for each rom and fix them.
I am under the impression you think CM needs to upgrade in order for CM based roms to upgrade, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
apparently theres a bit of confusion, there was some one nightly where the rotation wasnt working with the jb baseband, (im gussing on that nightly he used the kk source ) because flashing the kk baseband on that build fixed the rotation issue, but im not quiet aware of what the situation is ince im back on stock. anyways ill be swinging it on the latest nightly just to clarify my doubts. and im pretty sure they just want the maintainer to switch to kk source , btw nice to see you here hope your cooking something great for us
dr87 said:
Just to clarify, roms that are based on CM do not need CM to upgrade to 4.4.2 sources. The upgrade is done in the device tree / vendor files and kernel. The rom source does not need any changes and each rom maintainer for the G2 has the power to upgrade their rom to 4.4.2 G2 sources without CM doing anything, they just need to figure out the specific device tree bugs for each rom and fix them.
I am under the impression you think CM needs to upgrade in order for CM based roms to upgrade, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, in the past I had some Android phones, and CyanogenMod was always first with upgrading everything, and then other developers were basing their ROMs on these updates. I mean, they updated everything, end other ROMs were updated fast. They're not giving support which they were giving in the past, that's all.
reas0n said:
Well, in the past I had some Android phones, and CyanogenMod was always first with upgrading everything, and then other developers were basing their ROMs on these updates. I mean, they updated everything, end other ROMs were updated fast. They're not giving support which they were giving in the past, that's all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you get a response from Ricardo?
LenAsh said:
Did you get a response from Ricardo?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, i saw i got some 1+ on my comment, i shared second comment today. nothing..
reas0n said:
Nope, i saw i got some 1+ on my comment, i shared second comment today. nothing..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh
Bored of use TW roms, I want to change another based rom, which rom do you suggest as AOSP, AOKP based? With little bugs?
MaxiDeal said:
Bored of use TW roms, I want to change another based rom, which rom do you suggest as AOSP, AOKP based? With little bugs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM11 Snapshot M9
Tkkg1994 said:
CM11 Snapshot M9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Little bugs?
What about Slimrom? They don't appear to have any stable builds for your phone, but there's a weekly build on Kitkat 4.4.4 at the moment.
Slim-i9500-4.4.4.build.7.6-WEEKLY-6233
Might be worth checking out.
Other than that. I recommend checking out the I9500 section, and search for AOSP / Stable.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s4/i9500-develop
MaxiDeal said:
Little bugs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, no bugs at all.
Testing PACman. Smoothier than CM11 nightlies !
Back to stock. All AOSP,AOKP based roms are bull**** [emoji19]
Mod Edit
"Best" or "Recommend" ROM/kernel threads are not allowed on XDA.
Please test these things for yourself.
This is the only way you will get an unbiased opinion,and then, you can decide for yourself if it meets YOUR needs.
Don't forget to make a nandroid before you start.
Thread Closed
malybru
Forum Moderator
which miui rom is the newest and most stable for our phone?
pipyakas said:
which miui rom is the newest and most stable for our phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why don't you search for miui threads then look at the date in which the op was posted/modified
That will give you the answer plus read the threads for bugs/user experience