Pretty cool article:
http://labs.byhook.com/2011/01/13/digital-sheep-air-for-android-drawing-performance/
I got 40.8 fps with my private oc kernel in SGS Fascinate, compared to the stock CM10.1 at 27.1 fps, and stock i9100g at 35fps
SGX531 is a old gpu (create in Oct 2006) but recently a new version of SGX531 come : SGX531 Ultra. Same numbers of units but a big overclock. His frequency is estimated between 400 and 522 Mhz. Compared at the SGX540(Nexus S, Galaxy S base frequency, 200 mhz for memory) it's a huge difference. I know overclocked version of SGX 540 exist.(Galaxy Nexus, Optimus 3D, etc). But the architecture of SGX 531 is exactly the half of architecture of SGX 540. So in theory, if we set the frequency at the exact double of SGX 540, we should get the same results but... the reality is quite different. In fact after many tests, I've comparables results of SGX531 and SGX540. Unfortunately I do not know the exact frequency used by the SGX531. Many news phones(a lot of chineses phones apparently) use this "new" gpu on low cost smartphones. The tests were performed on models with similar configurations. (mono core processor 1 Ghz, 512 mb ram, same resolution 800*480)
Results :
GL Benchmark 2.7 : (Theorical Benchmark)
Triangle throughput Textured C24Z16 Offscreen : SGX531 Ultra 7,866,918 Triangles/sec | SGX540 4,490,935 Triangles/sec 17% Better
Triangle throughput Textured C24Z16 Onscreen : SGX531 Ultra 14,021,563 Triangles/sec | SGX540 11,053,386 Triangles/sec 27% Better
Fillrate C24Z16 Offscreen : SGX531 Ultra 267,150,928 Texels/sec | SGX540 219,676,416 Texels/sec 22% Better
Fillrate C24Z16 Onscreen : SGX531 Ultra 197,397,584 Texels/sec | SGX540 128,086,480 Texels/sec 54% Better
Taiji 3D Benchmark : (Geometry Benchmark)
SGX531 Ultra : 9,21 fps / SGX540 : 11,15 fps 21 % Lesser
Nenamark 2 :
SGX531 Ultra : 23,5 fps / SGX540 26,3 fps 12 % Lesser
We notice the overwhelming superiority of SGX531 Ultra on theoric tests but SGX540 is better in real conditions
With this results i can estimated the frequency of SGX531 Ultra, 522 Mhz is possible. (the fillrate is very dependent of processor, the processor used for the tests of SGX540 is slightly recessed relative to that of SGX531 but is not limited mostly)
Ran my own Note benchmark gamut.
3DMark Ice Storm Benchmark
Note 3 = 60.4FPS Test 1 ; 54.1 FPS Test 2; 30.8 FPS Physics; 57.2 FPS demo
Note 2 = 8.9FPS Test 1; 18.6 FPS Test 2; 32.5 FPS Physics; 19 FPS Demo
3DMark IceStorm Chip Benchmark
15911 vs 2771 score
Unreal Epic Citadel Benchmark
Note 3: 1920x1080 60FPS
Note 2: 1280x720 46.3 FPS
Quadrant
Note 3 = 20079
Note 2 = 6664
AnTuTu Benchmark
Note 3 = 28560
Note 2 = 19659
AnTuTu OpenGL ES 3.0
Note 3 = 3840
Note 2 = 1551
Speedtest.net (Connected to Campus 802.1x N wifi / Speedtest Clifton NJ server)
Note 3 = 8.57Mbps Down ; 4.68 Mbps Up
Note 2 = 8.13 Mbps Down; 1.57 Mbps Up
Also note that almost every benchmark opened and loaded significantly faster on the Note 3 thanks to the new throughput the device apparently has. Fantastic read/write speeds
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7376/samsung-galaxy-note-3-review
Gotcha beat
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Taa daa!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk 5
Please take it to the sticky thread for this stuff..http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2466099
I downloaded Geekbench 3 App to know my Tablet Z2 Benchmark Score and the results are :
Xperia Tablet Z2 Geekbench 3 Score :​Single Core 892
Multi Core 2532
I wanna know that weather Marshmallow scores are better than Kitkat and Lollipop's. You guyz also do the Benchmark and post your SCORES here.
the scores depend on the hardware not software