New android-x86 4.2 test build (based on android 4.2.2) available for download - RAZR i General

So Today this came out. Its very general for all Intel based devices.
http://www.webupd8.org/2013/02/new-android-x86-42-test-build-based-on.html
for the people who know more about programming than I do. How hard would it be for the ARM translator to be introduced here?

Do we need use virtual box
To run this build?
Sent from my XT890 using xda app-developers app

this isn't for razr I, is for a PC

We will get Android 4.2 in time... but it will take a while...
http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/android-4-2-jelly-bean-x86-emulator-system-image

ARM LIBs
Charlie.igg said:
So Today this came out. Its very general for all Intel based devices.
http://www.webupd8.org/2013/02/new-android-x86-42-test-build-based-on.html
for the people who know more about programming than I do. How hard would it be for the ARM translator to be introduced here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For ICS, you just need to look around for a copy of the "houdini" ARM libs, to add to your Android x86 build. Or you can download an image, with the ARM libs already added.
As the article says, however, that was ICS.
---------- Post added at 02:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:54 PM ----------
Marcb said:
We will get Android 4.2 in time... but it will take a while...
http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/android-4-2-jelly-bean-x86-emulator-system-image
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not from there (Intel), you won't. Check the EULA that comes up, when you click the link to download the source code. (Which reminds me... since when did Android, and it's modified Linux kernel, stop being Open Source?)
You have to agree with their EULA to download the source code.
Intel Corporation Internal Evaluation License Agreement for x86 Android* System Images for Android Software Development Kit (SDK)
...
THE EVALUATION MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED FOR EVALUATION PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY NOT BE DISTRIBUTED BY RECIPIENT OR INCORPORATED INTO RECIPIENT’S PRODUCTS OR SOFTWARE. PLEASE CONTACT AN INTEL SALES REPRESENTATIVE TO LEARN ABOUT THE AVAILABILITY AND COST OF A COMMERICAL VERSION OF THE EVALUATION SOFTWARE.
(Which reminds me... since when did Android, and it's modified Linux kernel, stop being Open Source?)

tekowalsky said:
(Which reminds me... since when did Android, and it's modified Linux kernel, stop being Open Source?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since the beginning as Android is under Apache Licence, not GPL.
This is why eveything in Android is not Open Source.

That's bull****.
The Linux kernel and it's associated android kernel is covered by the GPL. Intel know this.
The android userspace is licensed under the Apache licence.
That EULA isn't legally binding.
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

As you say: Only the Linux Kernel is under GPL
Kernel is a very small parts of a system image, with just the Kernel you can't do anything.
The Intel EULA is about a whole system image, not about the Linux Kernel.

Le_Poilu said:
As you say: Only the Linux Kernel is under GPL
Kernel is a very small parts of a system image, with just the Kernel you can't do anything.
The Intel EULA is about a whole system image, not about the Linux Kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe so, but even though I believe that a program that uses GPL code, even on a small part has to remain open!
Sent from my XT890 using xda app-developers app

pacobahyba said:
Maybe so, but even though I believe that a program that uses GPL code, even on a small part has to remain open!
Sent from my XT890 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think this is right. it has to be open if i remember right.

Good points. Does anyone know if Firefox OS has all of the Google apps? Until now, apparently Google stipulates that hardware manufacturers in the Android space must keep all Google apps in the final software presented to consumers. I remember Sony talking about this in their developer blogs. Now how is that open source either? That 'alliance' sounds like Google saying 'we're all equal partners, (except we're in control)'.

pangyaaaaaa said:
i think this is right. it has to be open if i remember right.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Simple aggregation doesn't cause the entire thing to fall under GPL. Whatever they run on top of the kernel can be under any license they want.

trwrt said:
Simple aggregation doesn't cause the entire thing to fall under GPL. Whatever they run on top of the kernel can be under any license they want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
then they should leave the kernel open source.
read teh newest GPL

So we are halted by legal problems?

So.. android x86_64 isnt going to be open source ? Just because of intel libs ?
Sent from my XT890 using xda app-developers app

zephyrdroid said:
So.. android x86_64 isnt going to be open source ? Just because of intel libs ?
Sent from my XT890 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What the? The source is there out in the wild... I don't understand where this thread is going
https://01.org/android-ia/documentation/get-code
Code:
repo init -u https://android-review.01.org/platform/manifest
repo sync -j8
Branches that can be used on repo:
Code:
android-4.2.2_r1-ia3
Released: 11 Jul 2013
Version: android-4.2.2_r1-ia3
android-4.2.2_r1-ia2
Released: 14 Jun 2013
Version: android-4.2.2_r1-ia2
android-4.2.2_r1-ia1
Released: 8 Apr 2013
Version: android-4.2.2_r1-ia1
android-4.2.2_r1-ia0
Released: 11 Mar 2013
Version: android-4.2.2_r1-ia0
android-4.2.1_r1-ia1
Released: 6 Feb 2013
Version: android-4.2.1_r1-ia1
android-4.2.1_r1-ia0
Released: 27 Dec 2012
Version: android-4.2.1_r1-ia0
android-4.1.2_r1-ia0
Released: 1 Nov 2012
Version: android-4.1.2_r1-ia0
android-4.1.1_r1-ia1
Released: 4 Oct 2012
Version: android-4.1.1_r1-ia1
android-4.1.1_r1-ia0
Released: 29 Aug 2012
Version: android-4.1.1_r1-ia0
That is code that can be built on x86 for different variants, libhoudini is a different topic -- but we shouldn't be needing binary translation to boot, problems I have encountered personally have been from trying to use Motorola's "sources" too and binary/libs crashing while booting as it is. Houdini is not a requirement to run Android, just provides compatibility at the apps who run on the DalvikVM level.
Running proprietary stuff on top of Android does not make Android stop being open source -- that to clarify what you wrote on the previous post.

Omar-Avelar said:
What the? The source is there out in the wild... I don't understand where this thread is going
https://01.org/android-ia/documentation/get-code
Code:
repo init -u https://android-review.01.org/platform/manifest
repo sync -j8
Branches that can be used on repo:
Code:
android-4.2.2_r1-ia3
Released: 11 Jul 2013
Version: android-4.2.2_r1-ia3
android-4.2.2_r1-ia2
Released: 14 Jun 2013
Version: android-4.2.2_r1-ia2
android-4.2.2_r1-ia1
Released: 8 Apr 2013
Version: android-4.2.2_r1-ia1
android-4.2.2_r1-ia0
Released: 11 Mar 2013
Version: android-4.2.2_r1-ia0
android-4.2.1_r1-ia1
Released: 6 Feb 2013
Version: android-4.2.1_r1-ia1
android-4.2.1_r1-ia0
Released: 27 Dec 2012
Version: android-4.2.1_r1-ia0
android-4.1.2_r1-ia0
Released: 1 Nov 2012
Version: android-4.1.2_r1-ia0
android-4.1.1_r1-ia1
Released: 4 Oct 2012
Version: android-4.1.1_r1-ia1
android-4.1.1_r1-ia0
Released: 29 Aug 2012
Version: android-4.1.1_r1-ia0
That is code that can be built on x86 for different variants, libhoudini is a different topic -- but we shouldn't be needing binary translation to boot, problems I have encountered personally have been from trying to use Motorola's "sources" too and binary/libs crashing while booting as it is. Houdini is not a requirement to run Android, just provides compatibility at the apps who run on the DalvikVM level.
Running proprietary stuff on top of Android does not make Android stop being open source -- that to clarify what you wrote on the previous post.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there any chance to build a usable ROM for Razr I from this source?
Using Git?! May the fork be with you

free2live said:
Is there any chance to build a usable ROM for Razr I from this source?
Using Git?! May the fork be with you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is what I have been trying lately, but haven't succeeded.

Originally Posted by free2live<br />
Is there any chance to build a usable ROM for Razr I from this source? <br />
<br />
Using Git?! May the fork be with you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
<br />
<br />
That is what I have been trying lately, but haven't succeeded.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean you can't get it to build successfully?!
Using Git?! May the fork be with you

free2live said:
You mean you can't get it to build successfully?!
Using Git?! May the fork be with you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can build fine, it just doesn't boot. Logcat does show weird errors.
Check at the bottom of this page >> here

Related

ics, linaro is a better choice

http://releases.linaro.org/11.11/android/images-ics-preview/mainline-panda/
http://www.linaro.org/downloads/
http://android.git.linaro.org/gitweb
panda is also omap4
riverzhou said:
http://releases.linaro.org/11.11/android/images-ics-preview/mainline-panda/
http://www.linaro.org/downloads/
http://android.git.linaro.org/gitweb
panda is also omap4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Slight bit of English might not hurt?
What is this?
What's there not to understand? Pandaboard is one of the most popular OMAP4 targets.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
pyrostic said:
Slight bit of English might not hurt?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b12/tehglow/manytank.jpg
that is many tank?
yes?
Linaro is an Alliance of ARM TI IBM Samsung Freescale ST-Ericsson . It's working for Open source Software for Linux on the ARM Cortex-A family of processors , Android on ARM, Unbuntu on ARM , linux/anrdoid toolchains and some libs .
They release their own source distribution Optimizated for Cortex-A8 and Cortex-A9 , and image distribution for PandaBoard(TI OMAP4430) , Origen(Samsung Exynos4210) , Snowball(ST-Ericsson's Nova A9500) , QuickStart(Freescale i.MX53) .
In one word , linaro android distribution will be better for A8 and A9 processors , much more Optimization .
This looks interesting, how do I test it out?
I just took a look at this and I don't get it sort off. It seems to be to be a version of android for like the PandaBoard.etc. However it doesn't come in the form of a zip but an img. I reckon with a bit of porting we could get it to work somehow but would it be worth it?
XperiaPlayer said:
I just took a look at this and I don't get it sort off. It seems to be to be a version of android for like the PandaBoard.etc. However it doesn't come in the form of a zip but an img. I reckon with a bit of porting we could get it to work somehow but would it be worth it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They have a git repo to pull the sources from, so devs could base roms off of this instead of AOSP. I don't see the advantage, but it's another option I guess~
XperiaPlayer said:
I just took a look at this and I don't get it sort off. It seems to be to be a version of android for like the PandaBoard.etc. However it doesn't come in the form of a zip but an img. I reckon with a bit of porting we could get it to work somehow but would it be worth it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can get source as same as CM or AOSP.
repo init -u git://android.git.linaro.org/platform/manifest.git -b linaro-android-11.12-release
repo sync
Linaro Android distribution will be better for A8 and A9 processors , much more Optimization .
And , you can use gcc4.5.4(linaro version) or gcc4.6.3(linaro version) to compile this Andoid distribution but CM or AOSP only for gcc4.4.3 from google.
shobon said:
They have a git repo to pull the sources from, so devs could base roms off of this instead of AOSP. I don't see the advantage, but it's another option I guess~
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a full optimization version for A8/A9 platform. It's all.
Anyway, linaro gcc is the best compiler for arm.
It can be use to compile android kernel , ever for CM or AOSP .

[INFO][KERNEL]Android 4.0.3, 3.0 Kernel Binaries Released for the Nexus S

straight from Jean-Baptiste Queru.. https://groups.google.com/group/android-building/msg/ff4e97808535b396?pli=1
this includes binaries for the Xoom tablet and the Galaxy Nexus
I've just pushed the kernel sources that match the crespo, stingray
and tuna kernel binaries for 4.0.3.
crespo: android-samsung-3.0-ics-mr1 in kernel/samsung
stingray: android-tegra-moto-2.6.39 in kernel/tegra
tuna: android-omap-tuna-3.0 in kernel/omap
As a note, for the curious, we've included the list of kernel
repositories at the bottom of
http://source.android.com/source/downloading.html so that it's easier
to get to them. They're also in the AOSP mirror manifest.
This completes the puzzle. Happy kerneling (?).
JBQ
--
Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru
Software Engineer, Android Open-Source Project, Google.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
*runs for cover before raining kernels start*
building from source now
Is it save to flash it, if I am on CM9 Kang? Will I loose root in this case?
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
He posted the code for the kernel you can't flash it but you can decompile it and tweak that ***** then package it for the masses to flash
I'm just messen with ya but if your looking for an aosp ICS then go to the general and there are a few post to get you going
BEST DAMN PHONE BECAUSE WE HAVE THE BEST DAMN DEVELOPERS!

4.1.2 and custom roms/kernels

I have had a quick look around and haven't seen a thread about this, but if I am wrong someone please direct me.
With 4.1.2 being out for people running stock, what does this leave custom roms with? I'm running paranoid android atm, so am I likely to see the improvements soon? Also I read that the binaries from 4.1.2 can be flashed on their own, will this give any benefit or am I better just leaving it?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Afaik the 4.1.2 kernel source isn't out yet, so kernel devs can't support it.
omnikai said:
Afaik the 4.1.2 kernel source isn't out yet, so kernel devs can't support it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kernel source for 4.1.2 has been out for a bit, and there are already many custom kernels. where have you been?
From: "Jean-Baptiste Queru" <[email protected]>
Date: Oct 10, 2012 5:34 PM
Subject: [android-building] 4.1.2 kernels
To: <[email protected]>
The kernel team tells me that all the 4.1.2 kernel sources have been
pushed to their respective projects.
JBQ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://android.googlesource.com/ker...per-3.1-jb-mr0 New Grouper branch.(nexus 7)
*

Ubuntu Phone installation is out + Source Code

Hey fellas,
Finally Ubuntu Phone is available for Nexus 4, GNexus...
Along with the source code.
Can't wait, Info: http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2013/02/ubuntu-phone-downloads-to-be-released-next-week
Preview (snapshots) on 21st FEB: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TouchInstallProcess ( thats for the nexus 4/ GNexus only, wide range of compatibilities according to hardware specifications and kernels afterwards)
New U.P. developer section on ubuntu.com: http://developer.ubuntu.com/get-started/gomobile/
Porting info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Porting
Our device is WIP (Work in Progress): https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Devices
Atrix 4G can still rock up to 2014...
tpr0 said:
Hey fellas,
Finally Ubuntu Phone is available for Nexus 4, GNexus...
Along with the source code.
Can't wait, Info: http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2013/02/ubuntu-phone-downloads-to-be-released-next-week
Preview (snapshots) on 21st FEB: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TouchInstallProcess ( thats for the nexus 4/ GNexus only, wide range of compatibilities according to hardware specifications and kernels afterwards)
New U.P. developer section on ubuntu.com: http://developer.ubuntu.com/get-started/gomobile/
Once the source code is release, porting will be rolling here
Atrix 4G can still rock up to 2014...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lets hope its compatible with tegra2. I have a windows 8 tablet with real windows, but ubuntu on my atrix i dont say no i hope the experience is good like on the desktop ubuntu.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzc0uMXGFBY
it will be on tegra for sure
harszeee said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzc0uMXGFBY
it will be on tegra for sure
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the Atrix 2 (OMAP), and that's Ubuntu for Android rather than Ubuntu Phone OS.
Ubuntu for Android, as I understand it, is basically the Webtop that we've already had for some time now and uses the kernel already on the device, whereas Ubuntu Phone OS is a complete replacement for Android, but the details themselves are a bit sketchy, like what display server they're using, what kernel is supported. Wouldn't it be both ironic and disappointing if it required an ICS/JB kernel, especially since we still have a Froyo/GB kernel.
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
lehjr said:
That's the Atrix 2 (OMAP), and that's Ubuntu for Android rather than Ubuntu Phone OS.
Ubuntu for Android, as I understand it, is basically the Webtop that we've already had for some time now and uses the kernel already on the device, whereas Ubuntu Phone OS is a complete replacement for Android, but the details themselves are a bit sketchy, like what display server they're using, what kernel is supported. Wouldn't it be both ironic and disappointing if it required an ICS/JB kernel, especially since we still have a Froyo/GB kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea because it's not really a proof that it is working for our tegra phone. it's a lot different so u have to find a phone that has the same specs this but there is no one.
let's see if it will work for us that would be awesome
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
lehjr said:
That's the Atrix 2 (OMAP), and that's Ubuntu for Android rather than Ubuntu Phone OS.
Ubuntu for Android, as I understand it, is basically the Webtop that we've already had for some time now and uses the kernel already on the device, whereas Ubuntu Phone OS is a complete replacement for Android, but the details themselves are a bit sketchy, like what display server they're using, what kernel is supported. Wouldn't it be both ironic and disappointing if it required an ICS/JB kernel, especially since we still have a Froyo/GB kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh sry my mistake thought that was an electrify
harszeee said:
oh sry my mistake thought that was an electrify
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, he identifies the device about 10 seconds or so in, but admittedly if he didn't the only other way to identify it would be process of elimination, looking at the logo's and figuring it out that way.
Guys, there's a post of saiftheboss7 that he mention that he made a request to Mark Shuttleworth, Ubuntu's Guru. You can upvote that request so that the Ubuntu Kahuna sees that us Atrix users want the Ubuntu OS for our beloved A4G. I can't post links right now, too noob for the forum, but you can check it out in this section.
Upvote my friends, upvote and we can have a better functional phone!!!!!:good:
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
DowJonesARG said:
Guys, there's a post of saiftheboss7 that he mention that he made a request to Mark Shuttleworth, Ubuntu's Guru. You can upvote that request so that the Ubuntu Kahuna sees that us Atrix users want the Ubuntu OS for our beloved A4G. I can't post links right now, too noob for the forum, but you can check it out in this section.
Upvote my friends, upvote and we can have a better functional phone!!!!!:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
please don't force the devs to support our phone. just let the image release si the devs can see the source code and the system. After that we can ask to import the os to the atrix if it's possible.
Just be patience.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
Sorry is just my nerves speaking. Hope to see it in action soon.
Enviado desde mi Atrix4G
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
Ubuntu was just released and tomorrow they will show how to port to other devices.Hope we can get it to work on our atrix.
Sent from my MB886 using xda app-developers app
wildchild048 said:
Ubuntu was just released and tomorrow they will show how to port to other devices.Hope we can get it to work on our atrix.
Sent from my MB886 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah tomorrow is porting lesson can the thread maker update and copy this https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Porting in? so the people who are intersted can hangout too so we get more people
Do you have, or may be adapted upload released today? ubuntu can only hope that this is no longer
It's released and port lessons are there xD Let's hope it works on atrix
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
Let's hope epinter can work his magic and port this for us.
Sent from my MB886 using xda app-developers app
So no devs are interested?
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
I think at this moment...devs are more interested in a working kernel for ICS
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
please install atrix 4g
rjayflo said:
I think at this moment...devs are more interested in a working kernel for ICS
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think this will be fully working without an ICS Kernel.
I think an effort like this worths a try, since we can aways update the userspace ubuntu packages, keeping the old kernel. I don't see why the old gingerbread kernel wouldn't work.

[REQUEST] N8000 Kernel Source

I am about to build a kernel for N8000. But my problem is I can not download from samsung open source site (Very Slow Connection).
Can someone please mirror the update7(MD1) for me on a fast server like dev-host, android file host, mediafire or etc...?
Here's the Samsung open source site:
http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=search&searchValue=GT-N8000
Thanks in advance.
You may use my GitHub repository, which has a branch "merge-to-ss-jb" that is just the vanilla Samsung kernel, backed by the complete Linux tree.
Also, if you're interested in a complete, up-to-date tree (and what I'm running on my own GNote) you may browse my "kernel-forward" branch.
kcrudup said:
You may use my GitHub repository, which has a branch "merge-to-ss-jb" that is just the vanilla Samsung kernel, backed by the complete Linux tree.
Also, if you're interested in a complete, up-to-date tree (and what I'm running on my own GNote) you may browse my "kernel-forward" branch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks.
I have two questions if you don't mind.
1. Merge-to-ss-jb is the latest source (MD1)? Is it a good to go for a kernel to be based upon?
2. Is it alright with you that I base my kernel on your own kernel?
I appreciate it if you can help me with some kernel stuff as I am new to this.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 4 Beta
csec said:
"merge-to-ss-jb" is the latest source (MD1)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, it's essentially the official Linux kernel source up to version 3.0.31, overlaid with a cleaned-up version of the 1st Samsung JB kernel release, then each subsequent Samsung Open-Source Release (latest is "#7") is overlaid on top of that. If you build the HEAD of that branch, you'll have a vanilla Samsung kernel as of XXMCD1.
Is it alright with you that I base my kernel on your own kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course! The entire Linux kernel is built upon Public collaboration; we all share from each other. My kernel has a few selected bits here and there from diverse places like CyanogenMod, Francisco Franco, Xstacy, the upstream kernel, Qualcomm, NVidia ...
I used to post my built kernel up in the ROM threads I used to use on my GNote, but someone complained and I don't really feel like being bothered with my own thread (don't have time for the inevitable newbie SPAM) so until if/when I do go "public" with it, the "kernel-forward" branch on GitHub is the best place to get what I'm running now.
kcrudup said:
Yeah, it's essentially the official Linux kernel source up to version 3.0.31, overlaid with a cleaned-up version of the 1st Samsung JB kernel release, then each subsequent Samsung Open-Source Release (latest is "#7") is overlaid on top of that. If you build the HEAD of that branch, you'll have a vanilla Samsung kernel as of XXMCD1.
Of course! The entire Linux kernel is built upon Public collaboration; we all share from each other. My kernel has a few selected bits here and there from diverse places like CyanogenMod, Francisco Franco, Xstacy, the upstream kernel, Qualcomm, NVidia ...
I used to post my built kernel up in the ROM threads I used to use on my GNote, but someone complained and I don't really feel like being bothered with my own thread (don't have time for the inevitable newbie SPAM) so until if/when I do go "public" with it, the "kernel-forward" branch on GitHub is the best place to get what I'm running now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great!
Thanks again.
Sent from my GT-N8000 using Tapatalk HD
csec said:
Great!
Thanks again.
Sent from my GT-N8000 using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Heard that the published sources have different wi-fi drivers than preinstalled stock kernel.
This is the main reason of allshare cast not working with custom kernels (on the contrary, some s3 custom kernels DO SUPPORT allshare cast), even if status=official and flash counter=0.
Anyone can confirm?
Anyone has the proper ones or know which one (i.e. from a different samsung device) to use?
gitHub link dead

Categories

Resources