Adreno 200 GPU better? - XPERIA X8 General

Hi!
I read this:laugh:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2167228
and I think with us it can be checked
Same for the time being I have not tested it, but from the comments that I see it is working properly
what do you think

reserved for new info

Did you try it??
sent from my phone using hands and brain...

Same for the time being I have not tested it, but from the comments that I see it is working properly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"I have not tested it"
You use a brain right

CWM zipfile not working in latest nAa .32 kernel v4 with MiniCM10 4.1.0

R: Adreno 200 GPU better?
CtrlAltDelIrl said:
CWM zipfile not working in latest nAa .32 kernel v4 with MiniCM10 4.1.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need gb if im not wrong
Sent from my E15i using xda app-developers app

R: Adreno 200 GPU better?
No difference for me..
Sent from my E15i using xda app-developers app

maybe just put this mod into rom ?

We need a Mythbusters thread guys!
What do you think of the idea? Some of these hacks, including build.prop tweaks have been proven to not even exist in google's code..

this is true : Rolleyes: maybe soon works on x8 device

Why not?
I'm going to backup my MiniCM 4.0.2 and flash this CWM Zip, and I'll tell you my impressions.

ok We are waiting
but not sure it works , :silly:

No effect:thumbdown:
wanna thank xda? here

Yes it works

CtrlAltDelIrl said:
We need a Mythbusters thread guys!
What do you think of the idea? Some of these hacks, including build.prop tweaks have been proven to not even exist in google's code..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why dont u create one :laugh:

adreno
it looks not bad

19LeoN94 said:
it looks not bad
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes i know , but on arm v6 device not work right now

tiestobunio said:
Yes i know , but on arm v6 device not work right now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think now it's work, because I got 2656 points in antutu 3D test (origi score between 2300-2400)!

tiestobunio said:
Hi!
I read this:laugh:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2167228
and I think with us it can be checked
Same for the time being I have not tested it, but from the comments that I see it is working properly
what do you think
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for pointing out.
Anybody tried V07 yet?

yair made and backported gpu drivers from newer devices to work in our devices, you can pm him for the link

Related

Touch recovery 5.8.1.5 for Galaxy S II by koush

Finally its here!!
Tried on HyperDroid rom with redpill kernel but doesn't work on it,but on other its working
Source
Direct download
how did your testing went?? is it good?
edit:
also , is this for GB alone or also for ICS
Got some screenshots?
bala_gamer said:
how did your testing went?? is it good?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doesn't work on hyperdroid rom
But i started a thread to let people know and for testing if this works on every other rom and kernel
HellcatDroid said:
Got some screenshots?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Video added
EDIT: @bala_gamer these are only recovery files and not a kernel so maybe it also works on ICS, but i don't know if their are some modifications done in recovery to work on ICS
How should i flash this?Tried via CWM but failed its stuck on "replacing stock recovery with cwm recovery"
Thx for sharing!
Tested on latest CM9 build and it works but disappears after 1 reboot
Nice add on
Yes, it's a fakeflash, one of the devs need to integrate it in a kernel, I want to do, but I need a tester
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
netchip said:
Yes, it's a fakeflash, one of the devs need to integrate it in a kernel, I want to do, but I need a tester
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here's the tester! (atleast for CM9)
netchip said:
Yes, it's a fakeflash, one of the devs need to integrate it in a kernel, I want to do, but I need a tester
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I confirmed it working as well.
nice!!!
10char
Flashed with CWM, no errors!
But how to test or start it?
Ok, will find out myself
I think that's the only place (Recovery) where I like it the old non touch way, less chance of mistake
Swyping from my GT-I9100 via Tt
flahsed over ics (XXLPB), nothing changed in cwm
bala_gamer said:
flahsed over ics (XXLPB), nothing changed in cwm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's normal, I have a few testers for the recovery.
Have patience and you get the touch recovery
ithehappy said:
I think that's the only place (Recovery) where I like it the old non touch way, less chance of mistake
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree 100%. Apart from saving a few seconds for bu/recovery, I can't see any advantages at all.
B3311 said:
Agree 100%. Apart from saving a few seconds for bu/recovery, I can't see any advantages at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree too. Its a really cool concept but knowing me I'll fat-finger it and screw something up. Recovery is NOT a place I want to make mistakes. I'll still try it out cause it is a really cool idea.
02ranger said:
I agree too. Its a really cool concept but knowing me I'll fat-finger it and screw something up. Recovery is NOT a place I want to make mistakes. I'll still try it out cause it is a really cool idea.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do you think they have eleventy billion "No" options and only one "Yes" option?
ClockWorkMod Recovery said:
no
no
no
no
no
yes
no
no
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@netchip
Wish the best luck for your testers

Tell me your perfect ICS-Rom

Tell me your perfect ICS-Rom
So I will beginn :
I think Slim ICS + Devil-Kernel[ICS] is good
Aokp with devil/semaphore kernal is also very good.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Xevez said:
Hello
I want to know from YOU , which is the best rom-combi for ics ?
So i beginn ,
I think darkknight V3 + devil kernel is really good
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are dozens of threads like this... browse around a little and you'll find all kind of opinions. No need for another thread IMHO.
GT-i9000 / ICSSGS 4.2 / Semaphore 0.9.0
CM9+semaphore=perfect (works for me at least)
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Slim ICS 2.8 + semaphore 0.9.1 works wonders for me
ZioGTS said:
There are dozens of threads like this... browse around a little and you'll find all kind of opinions. No need for another thread IMHO.
GT-i9000 / ICSSGS 4.2 / Semaphore 0.9.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes i know mate , but who cares how many threath there are maybe there are 1 or 2 more , i only want to know wich ics rom people use
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA
Xevez said:
Yes i know mate , but who cares how many threath there are maybe there are 1 or 2 more , i only want to know wich ics rom people use
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then you're a %#&*@€# spammer :/ !!! :thumbdown:
dark_knight35 said:
Then you're a %#&*@€# spammer :/ !!! :thumbdown:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why ?
because i made a thread ?
Xevez said:
Why ?
because i made a thread ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because you made an already existing thread.
dark_knight35 said:
Because you made an already existing thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I see , but that isn't spamming , mate
test...................
Xevez said:
Yes I see , but that isn't spamming , mate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In my opinion, creating unnecessary threads is spamming, or how do you call it?
test-.................
-deleted
.
zeitgeist181 said:
test...................
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
zeitgeist181 said:
test-.................
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you testing if I call you a spammer?
Slim ICS or CNA 1.4 (be18 version) with Semaphore 0.9.5b!!!
Sent from my ASUM GS!
Dark Knight 3.0. CM.... why even bother with CM? They're still alpha testing while DK is a nearly polished ROM...
slim ics - slim and fast, my favorite!
CM9/AOKP+semaphore
but i still use cm7+neo18
best ICS rom
Slim 2.8 rocks!

[WIP][ROM] MokeeOS Dhalham-GalaxyACE

Hey guys, this is a port of the rom MoKeeOS for Galaxy Ace. The current status is BETA/RC, everthing works except minor bugs. This rom is based on CM 7.2 by vo-1.
Downloads:
RC1:Temporarily removed.
RC1.1: http://www.multiupload.co.uk/DUMAPRNVIL
Working:
Swipe notifications(HOT)
Swipe settings
3D and 2D rendering
Boot successfully
Keyboard
Overclock (must flash the latest http://www.clockworkmod.com/rommana...&name=Superuser&deviceName=Samsung Galaxy Ace )
Camera
Bluetooth
WiFi
Very smooth
Nearly everything else
Not working/Bugs:
Phone app and contacts android acore FC (thats a problem with the MoKeeOS team since they currently dont support mdpi devices).
Report anything else.
Flash instructions:
Wipe data/factory reset
Wipe dalvik
Flash MoKeeOS
Flash latest superuser: http://www.clockworkmod.com/rommana...&name=Superuser&deviceName=Samsung Galaxy Ace
Reboot
Press thanks if you like!
Screens at the bottom!
Changelogs:
RC1: Booting. Based on CM 7.2. Give some feedback please! Most things work.
RC1.1: Cleaned alot of apps.
Reserved
SIR. This ROM has already made by CCGH . dont REPOST please.
link : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1723633
This thread might be closed by moderators
Shadow xD said:
This thread might be closed by moderators
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Coming soon threads aren't allowed. At least post some details.
Btw unless yours is bug free, there is already a WIP port by Robin
Its fully hdpi plus not everything works.
Can someone gimme the link to Robin's version?
Maclaw has a coming soon AOSP ICS rom.
King ACE said:
Can someone gimme the link to Robin's version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well.. i did it in my post right
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
dhalham said:
Maclaw has a coming soon AOSP ICS rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No offence bro, but he has posted sufficient details. That is why I told you to put up some details. Anyway good luck for your work.
if your making a coming soon thread then u have to give details (about rom& bugs)
this way moderator is gonna close thread
and btw guys just because this rom was already ported doesnt mean he cant post his version
dhalham said:
Building, nearly done!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
building
Sucess it boots! Redesigning post and uploading file!
Done! Check it out!
nice, but how are we supposed to make calls in this rom ?
This has warez!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
diegonnc said:
nice, but how are we supposed to make calls in this rom ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im working on that, since MoKeeOS has problem with mdpi.
NathanBookham said:
This has warez!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whats warez?
dhalham said:
Whats warez?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Warez are paid apps and if this rom haves warez i suggest you to remove the link or a mod will come...
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium

[Discussion Thread] About CM10.1 - CM10.2 for the Xperia Play!

Discussions for CM10.1 and CM10.2 for the Xperia Play. If something new is coming. All discussion goes here.
im really for your project.
i hope you fix everything
_____________
a little quastion about bbqlinux
does it have all we need for compiling kernel and cm10(or other cm's) ?
and which version should i download for core i7 ivy brige (64bit) ?
pedyvirus said:
a little quastion about bbqlinux
does it have all we need for compiling kernel and cm10(or other cm's) ?
and which version should i download for core i7 ivy brige (64bit) ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you should stick with Ubuntu 13.04 or else Linux Mint 15
Because bbqlinux its hard to install some updates. Compiling gives alot of errors. I'm switching my OS on Ubuntu 13.04 by this friday
Hurreyyy
[email protected] very happy to hear from u about this great news.so many contributors and members felt shocked of removing ur previous post.but
TAHNKS TO U FROM ME AND FROM ALL OUR XPLAY MEMBERS.WE RESPECT U
So because of viper cmx do u need a new bootlogo from me?
Sent from my SXP [R800i]
CyberScopes said:
So because of viper cmx do u need a new bootlogo from me?
Sent from my SXP [R800i]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Later bro. Let me settle up some things first
Sent from my GT-I9100G using xda premium
So hashy are you continuing your old ROM and kernel or are you starting from scratch?
sent from my Sony Ericsson xperia play ™ (r800x) using Tapatalk 4
crazymonkey05 said:
So hashy are you continuing your old ROM and kernel or are you starting from scratch?
sent from my Sony Ericsson xperia play ™ (r800x) using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup. If can i will start from scratch
@Hashy what happened to your old Kernel and ROM that you would start from scratch ?? I mean any reason for that ?? y not continue dev. cuz that would be easier and faster isn't it.. did the old ROM boot ? did you boot into 4.3 yet I mean through any means ?
saqibkhan said:
@Hashy what happened to your old Kernel and ROM that you would start from scratch ?? I mean any reason for that ?? y not continue dev. cuz that would be easier and faster isn't it.. did the old ROM boot ? did you boot into 4.3 yet I mean through any means ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because i was using Some of Legacy Xperia commits for my kernel. And the dev don't allow anyone to copy his work
I will start my work by this friday and lets see how it goes.
Hashy said:
Because i was using Some of Legacy Xperia commits for my kernel. And the dev don't allow anyone to copy his work
I will start my work by this friday and lets see how it goes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that you can not compete . You should create together---> it is better---> Have a good rom with kernel than 2 ragged rom with 2 kernel. But mike can work on rom and you can work on kernel This is just my opinion sorry for bad english!
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
Hashy said:
Because i was using Some of Legacy Xperia commits for my kernel. And the dev don't allow anyone to copy his work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And that's the reason why we don't have 3.4 kernel and 4.3 ROM yet. It's because nobody wants to share work with others or work together on one kernel and one ROM. Anyway i wish you all luck.
hmmm.. unity is strength.. Xperia play is no more about Cosmic Dans Turbo Kernel.. or Lupus's Kernel.. or AOKP or CyanagenMod.. (I mean all this in a good way) we need a "ROM" 4.2/4.3 for Xperia Play and a "Kernel" for Xperia Play.. the brand, the dev, no matters no more.. and the way things are,, I really think dev's should team up to make one Good Rom.. and One Good Kernel.. cuz I don't think Xperia Play would last till Android 6.0 .. so just this device one good last push.. and see how things work out. Split work will only increase/duplicate work.. delay the ROM/Kernel and maybe the ROM would never get rid of bugs.
Guys I don't think teaming up is going to happen, the old thread got deleted so I can't show you any of the stuff that happened. But it got pretty nasty so lets not bring working together up and just focus on getting a stable 4.3 build for our Xperia Play's
^I'm_With_Stupid said:
Guys I don't think teaming up is going to happen, the old thread got deleted so I can't show you any of the stuff that happened. But it got pretty nasty so lets not bring working together up and just focus on getting a stable 4.3 build for our Xperia Play's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree...hashy I'm sorry I can't really assist you as my play is my daily driver so all my stuff is on it.....but I'm rooting for you!!!
sent from my Sony Ericsson xperia play ™ (r800x) using Tapatalk 4
What about we try CM10.1 first Maybe we can fix those bugs. I think CM10.2 wont be stable enough for our device yet we dont have any stable CM10.1. If you guys still need CM10.2. I'll try my best
Hashy said:
What about we try CM10.1 first Maybe we can fix those bugs. I think CM10.2 wont be stable enough for our device yet we dont have any stable CM10.1. If you guys still need CM10.2. I'll try my best
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually yes that seems like a good idea, as 4.3 is only a minor update of 4.2 and people have had success on the play before building 4.2 (without wifi though). But my main concern is being ready for 4.4, which if it is as ram light as everyone says and runs just as fast as gingerbread as everyone is saying, would be perfect for our Xperia Play's. But beggars can't be choosers as I always say
Hashy said:
What about we try CM10.1 first Maybe we can fix those bugs. I think CM10.2 wont be stable enough for our device yet we dont have any stable CM10.1. If you guys still need CM10.2. I'll try my best
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gee sounds like something I posted before on y don't we get cm10.1 stable on our before we jump 4.3 it made no sense to me but hey what ever works I guess
Sent from my R800x using xda premium
Hashy said:
Because i was using Some of Legacy Xperia commits for my kernel. And the dev don't allow anyone to copy his work
I will start my work by this friday and lets see how it goes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably you haven't understand the problem: the problem wasn't you using some of the lxp's commits, the problem was you not asking permissions like everyone else; now probably mike want let you use his work as a base, but it isn't because he is selfish and didn't allow the other people to use his work, it is because you go against the common rule
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4
^I'm_With_Stupid said:
Actually yes that seems like a good idea, as 4.3 is only a minor update of 4.2 and people have had success on the play before building 4.2 (without wifi though). But my main concern is being ready for 4.4, which if it is as ram light as everyone says and runs just as fast as gingerbread as everyone is saying, would be perfect for our Xperia Play's. But beggars can't be choosers as I always say
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's see then
darkharbinger81 said:
Gee sounds like something I posted before on y don't we get cm10.1 stable on our before we jump 4.3 it made no sense to me but hey what ever works I guess
Sent from my R800x using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That what i was thinking just now. But nevermind.
[email protected] said:
Probably you haven't understand the problem: the problem wasn't you using some of the lxp's commits, the problem was you not asking permissions like everyone else; now probably mike want let you use his work as a base, but it isn't because he is selfish and didn't allow the other people to use his work, it is because you go against the common rule
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Against rule? Bro, Let it be now. I'll work on my way. I don't need any-one permission from now on

[Q] (Q) Mga sir what do you think is the best tweak combination for galaxy y

Mga sir what do you think is the best tweak combination for gya, mine are vulpix, megabass, and net fork tnks
boomagi said:
Mga sir what do you think is the best tweak combination for gya, mine are vulpix, megabass, and net fork tnks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you can try vulpix with fly-on RC1
best combi tweaks for gya
the X Machine said:
you can try vulpix with fly-on RC1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tnks sir i will try, are there any conflict between these two tweaks:laugh:
boomagi said:
tnks sir i will try, are there any conflict between these two tweaks:laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there used to be but after vulpix updated to v3 they started like a charm
the X Machine said:
you can try vulpix with fly-on RC1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Accprding to the Vulpix creator it is not recommended to use Vulpix and Fly-On tweaks at the same time. Check out the Vulpix thread.
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
JasoX said:
Accprding to the Vulpix creator it is not recommended to use Vulpix and Fly-On tweaks at the same time. Check out the Vulpix thread.
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
falsesmindalone said:
My experience almost the same with Souroking As of now i dont experience any conflict between the two tweaks, The frequencies running fine.if you ask me why i say its perfect combi because I experienced in fly on v4 after a boot i feel some 5-10mins lag and random boot but aftet that i feel the smoothness of fly-on but when i flash vulpix v3 it FIXED this all and give me 3x smoothness,greatness & happiness..btw i don`t have any other tweaks im Satisfied with Vulpix & Fly On ^__^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i tried it he tried it and a lot of users in the core/ace/s/s2/s3/s4/note/note2/note3 forms tried it and it works try it your self because you just making me mad
Chill bro! I had the info from the Vulpix developers thread.
And if you got it to work without any conflicts that is brilliant!
Which one did you flash first? Fly-Ob or Vulpix!
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
i don't know
JasoX said:
Chill bro! I had the info from the Vulpix developers thread.
And if you got it to work without any conflicts that is brilliant!
Which one did you flash first? Fly-Ob or Vulpix!
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think i flashed Vulpix first but i don't think it really matter:silly:
press thx if i helped
result on combi of vupix+fly on+megabass+netfork
well at first its look ok until i use my music player it got mess up, so the result on my unit not compatible. Back to the original quest, mga sir are there other tweaks that is compatible or compliment each other?
Try Jarvis Kernel with Velocity 7 Tweak...I tried it aand its fast smooth on my Deodexed Stock ROM
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
th PurePerformances X Golden Edition on solo would be just fine. Actually, I have investigated on to something and I noticed that the changelog from Vulpix 3.0 and the PurePerformances X are the same, its just that the author in the Vulpix changed the order
phillippous said:
th PurePerformances X Golden Edition on solo would be just fine. Actually, I have investigated on to something and I noticed that the changelog from Vulpix 3.0 and the PurePerformances X are the same, its just that the author in the Vulpix changed the order
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you think @Nitzz is a kanger?
Sent from my GT-S5300 using Tapatalk 0.01a
Love doesn't need any reason.
luqman98 said:
So you think @Nitzz is a kanger?
Sent from my GT-S5300 using Tapatalk 0.01a
Love doesn't need any reason.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
buahahahaahahaha... xD
rofl..!
lmao..!
@luqman98 - look who said that..
a guyz whoz even 10 post arnt completed yet.. xD
 @phillippous- bro plz leave the developemnt part to developers..
just use it or dont if u dnt like it..
cz it wont affect me..
i dont think u even knw whats in it.. :/
and my vulpix is hell lot better than pure performance.. xD
and i dont owe u an explaination..
@op Vulpix3.0 is cool. It gives me a boot time of 25 sec in h8
I'm using vulpix3.0 + flyon4.0 +gamers ram manager.... Working well in perf & battery
And other members if you like a tweak praise it. If you don't then there is no necessary to tell whole the world about it. Devs work hard for us. And they don't charge u too. So stop flaming threads. Moderators and senior devs will report such kangers.... So peace out
And a Hava a great year ahead

Categories

Resources