Asking difficult questions at Samsung's Dev U session at CES... - Galaxy Note 10.1 General

I went to CES last month and attended the Developer U sessions. Made out like a bandit - got a free perception camera from Intel - like the Kinect only way smaller and a neat Bluetooth sensor dongle from the Bluetooth SIG and TI. The last session of the day was "Samsung and Developers" and after what was basically a video showing parties they hold in a few places in the US for developers came the Q&A sessions... except not one person had a question - which wasn't surprising since well, Samsung hadn't actually said anything.
Seizing the opportunity, I put my hand up and asked three questions:
1. Why doesn't Samsung finish documenting their unique hardware. I pointed out that, for example, the IRBlaster is still not documented even though it's on quite a few of their devices now and that we had to reverse engineer it from the kernel source.
2. Why doesn't Samsung consolidate their hardware at least to the point where their APIs are consistent across all devices. This would help solidify them as the 'other Apple' and ensure that people could and would develop for their platform even if it meant they couldn't make it work on other Android devices.
This was something I was pushing all over CES: that developers tend to forget that if they pick Apple - they're picking ONE manufacturer - but when they go to Android, for some reason, they feel compelled to support every single Android device out there - no matter how crappy it is. I kept proposing that a better approach is to do the same thing they do for Apple: pick ONE major Android company and develop for it and it alone. Samsung is the logical choice because they have the single largest market share - but they need to get their developer model simplified and consistent. That's what I took to the Samsung reps at this session.
3. Why are there so many variations on one device.. I held up my 8013 and noted that there's an 8000, the 8010 which comes in at least a dozen different versions each with their own version of Android, the 8017, the 8020... And this would be ok IF.. they made sure all versions were consistent and rolled out at the same time. Spreading updates across three months doesn't work for developers. By the time we've got our software working on say, Jellybean for the Note 10.1, Samsung's released a new version of the product and we have to start all over again. It's just not cost effective for developers.
I pointed out that Samsung claimed that the JellyBean release was first going to be 'by the end of the year' and then 'soon' which at the time suggested before December - possibly before November 2012. In fact, it rolled out almost at the end of the year for the 8000s and then slowly over the next few weeks for the 8010s. I noted that neither the US 8013s or the Canada 8010s had gotten theirs by that point in time.
I also described my experience with the Samsung Galaxy Nexus - the forgotten stepchild of Samsung.
I got mixed responses...
1. They agreed this was a good idea.
2. They kind of agreed this was a good goal, but it would be difficult (I'm not entirely sure why - Apple does it).
3. This is the biggest failure of the three. They stood there muttering for about five minutes then came back with 'You've answered your own question - it's because each model has to meet each country's regulations and markets'. My response was, again - Apple. When a new version of iOS is rolled out - everyone gets it everywhere in the world all at the same time. There may be more than one version of the iPad - but the customer doesn't know it. Perhaps Apple just holds back on new iOS releases until all the versions are tested so it looks unified - but the result is that Apple seems to be better at predicting when they'll ship a new OS and they generally hit pretty close to the date - everywhere.
You could tell the Samsung reps were *not* happy with me.
No one else asked any questions of them - one guy did come over and talk to me about how I would suggest solving some of these problems.
They did however give everyone a Samsung SIII plastic phonecover. Yay, since I don't have an SIII.
On the floors, Samsung had a big booth in the Main Hall that was pretty much dedicated to the Note 2 as was their main booth in the South hall. The Note 10.1 was barely there. Sammy was selling the SIII and the Note 2.
As I mentioned elsewhere, Corning was showing the Note 10.1 as one of their showcase Gorilla Glass 2 clients.
I'll be honest, I doubt my questions and comments will make much of an impact with Samsung - although I do have to note, several companies including Belkin did agree with my proposal of picking Samsung and focussing on them rather than trying to build for every Android device out there - although I also suggested that if they go Samsung, Asus, HTC, LC and Acer and stop when they hit the market share they're happy with, it could get them almost 85% of the Android market in five product lines or less...
On the other hand, it was good to finally get a chance to vent at Samsung.

Amen. This is my first main stream android tablet and even though I love the note, I'm extremely frustrated with CSC, version differences on the same hardware from 4.0 top 4.1.2 .
Sluggish extremely frustrated with the 30 pin connector, but I knew about that before I hopped on the big bus. I just didn't realize how much I would miss a tab with multiple standard inputs and outputs.
If only someone would ask me to build the perfect tablet from the perfect company. Lol
Sent from my GT-N8000 using Tapatalk HD

I wish you would have asked why nearly every other tablet on the market can charge like 5 times faster than Samsung tablets. LOL The Galaxy Tab 8.9 I had took forever and the Note 10.1 isn't much better.
Sent from my GT-N8013 using Tapatalk 2

TheWerewolf said:
I
They stood there muttering for about five minutes then came back with 'You've answered your own question - it's because each model has to meet each country's regulations and markets'.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:laugh: I have a swiss GERMAN version AUT (which is not updated yet), where it get's crazzy:
I put the DBT JB on mine and found out that the DBT(normaly for Germany) is also the original/official swiss FRENCH version.
(it does contain all providers of my country and these aren't operating outside of it)
Switzerland isn't part of EU anyway, but even in the EU, Luxembourg has it's own version! So WTF, why ?
I don't know why, but it seems that Samsung just has a big mess with it, probably there are too many lawyers instead of technicians. :laugh:

marcxs said:
probably there are too many lawyers instead of technicians. :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't be surprised if this is exactly it!

kcrudup said:
I wouldn't be surprised if this is exactly it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont forget that the legal fight between apple and samsung is probably siphoning off resources for both companies. Could be time for asus and htc or lg to step up their game and take advantage.
Sent from my GT-N8013 using Tapatalk 2

ExploreMN said:
I wish you would have asked why nearly every other tablet on the market can charge like 5 times faster than Samsung tablets. LOL The Galaxy Tab 8.9 I had took forever and the Note 10.1 isn't much better.
Sent from my GT-N8013 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't feel the note 10 tales long at all ipad takes almost twice as long to charge
Sent from my GT-N8010 using xda app-developers app

Your statement on changing. ..
ExploreMN said:
I wish you would have asked why nearly every other tablet on the market can charge like 5 times faster than Samsung tablets. LOL The Galaxy Tab 8.9 I had took forever and the Note 10.1 isn't much better.
Sent from my GT-N8013 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your statement was interesting. Sounds like experiences differ too. Before I first used my tablet I fully charged it. I get over 16 hrs on one charge or more. I've been using it since 10 am & it is now 12:40am and I have 64% battery left. My model is N8013. I have watched a boatload of YouTube vids, played a game, tweaked my trusted credentials that took awhile since I had to look some up on the web. Read, transferred files using Allshare & wifi direct. Normally I charge at night while I'm asleep. Most times the battery out lasts me.

My note, when I got back in august, charged fast and lasted 4ever, now since jellybean its knida crappin out innthat department
Sent from my GT-N8013 using Tapatalk HD

ExploreMN said:
I wish you would have asked why nearly every other tablet on the market can charge like 5 times faster than Samsung tablets. LOL The Galaxy Tab 8.9 I had took forever and the Note 10.1 isn't much better.
Sent from my GT-N8013 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Note battery is 7000mah. Charger is 2100mah charger. 7/2.1 = 3.33 hours to fully charge from fully depleted. HOWEVER.
Lithium polymer batteries are not charged at a constant amperage. The charger will charge at full power up until the individual cells in the pack reach 4.2 volts and then it decreases the amperage so that the pack remains at 4.2 and does not go above 4.2 (or else you will have fire everywhere). It continues to lower the amperage until it has to decrease it so much that it goes to zero. Now your batter is charged all the way up to 7000 mah of goodness. So it won't actually take 3.33 hours to charge. It will take longer. That is of course disregarding efficiency loss in charging and if the device is on or off.
So why didn't they include a higher power charger to charge it faster? Because Samsung is a cheapskate. But inadvertently, charging slower is better for batteries so yay your device will last longer. This is also why I charge my gnex from my pc at ~500mah instead of the 1000mah wall charger.

Related

Never buying from Samsung again

Samsung sucks. Look at the T-Mobile G2 (HTC Vision) for example... ~30 MFLOPS result in Linpack with stock clock, and so much more when overclocked to a maximum of 1.6 Ghz (from 800 mhz). Samsung Galaxy S? Never passes 20 MFLOPS, despite having a very similar processor, and not as good at overclocking. G2 has completely AOSP Android and also CyanogenMod project behind it 100%, Galaxy S has customized outdated system and slow (though quite successful) CyanogenMod progress. And the T-Mobile G2 is not the only device I can compare the SGS to; just look at any recent Android phone. The EVO 4G, for example, might have a weaker GPU than a Galaxy S, but atleast it gets superior software support (from XDA and HTC). HTC releases the kernel source quick after every update, while Samsung lags behind (which means that Voodoo needs to be hacked into newer kernels through reverse engineering instead of just slapping in the C code and compiling.)
I bought the Vibrant because my G1 died, and the Vibrant (and entire Galaxy S series) has great performance and hardware, but it's not so great when you have ****ty software engineers (Samsung) getting it all to work.
Never Samsung again. I enjoyed the switch from G1 to Vibrant, and I really enjoy XDA's continued support of the Vibrant. But next upgrade (or earlier), I'm getting a good device from HTC.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Your frustration is understandable. Why don't you tell samsung and t-mobile via twitter directly.
Also, I think since Google chose the galaxy s (Nexus S) as their google experience phone, in the long run, Vibrant owners will greatly benefit.
Cool story bro
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
Zyxwvu44 said:
Cool story bro
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Id be glad to read it again.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Linpacks and quadrant have no real justice in there score I know most people love having the higher numbers but there just numbers. My buddy has a Samsung and his quadrant numbers are way better than my evo but I have mine set up so it flows better. Well for me it does. And for over clocking why That **** kills my battery quicker even if its set up like the best evo developers. Just find a rom and a kernal u like and u will be good I know most people like the cyanogen mod but alot of people also hate it.
Another thing can be u got a bad Samsung see if u can get a new one maybe that can get better scores if there thanlt important to you.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
I can understand your frustration dude, I really can, but in the scheme of things, whether or you, or any one of us as an individual decides to not buy from them, the fact remains we helped this happen:
Samsung sells 9.3 million Galaxy S devices, within reaching distance of its lofty goal
By Vlad Savov posted Dec 22nd 2010 7:49PM
10 million freaking smartphones. Who thought, when Samsung put that number forward as its 2010 Galaxy S sales goal two months ago, that it was actually going to happen? Well, with just over a week left in the calendar year, the Korean giant has racked up 9.3 million sales of its Android superphone globally and actually expects to sneak past the mythical 10 million mark just before the champagne glasses start clinking. The Galaxy S has also scored a win in its home market of South Korea, where its two million units sold so far leads the iPhone 4's 1.8 million sales. Hearty congratulations are due to the crew in Seoul, such success doesn't happen by chance, but let's keep working on those Froyo (and Gingerbread!) software updates as well, eh chaps?
InformationWeek
sourceThe Chosunibo
Check out the link:
http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/22/samsung-sells-9-3-million-galaxy-s-devices-within-reaching-dist/
So I seriously doubt if you could stop them achieving their goals as an individual.
SamsungVibrant said:
Your frustration is understandable. Why don't you tell samsung and t-mobile via twitter directly.
Also, I think since Google chose the galaxy s (Nexus S) as their google experience phone, in the long run, Vibrant owners will greatly benefit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a good idea, thanks. And yes, I think the Nexus S will be the only thing preventing me from selling ny Vibrant for the next 1.5 years.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
androidcee123 said:
I can understand your frustration dude, I really can, but in the scheme of things, whether or you, or any one of us as an individual decides to not buy from them, the fact remains we helped this happen:
Samsung sells 9.3 million Galaxy S devices, within reaching distance of its lofty goal
By Vlad Savov posted Dec 22nd 2010 7:49PM
10 million freaking smartphones. Who thought, when Samsung put that number forward as its 2010 Galaxy S sales goal two months ago, that it was actually going to happen? Well, with just over a week left in the calendar year, the Korean giant has racked up 9.3 million sales of its Android superphone globally and actually expects to sneak past the mythical 10 million mark just before the champagne glasses start clinking. The Galaxy S has also scored a win in its home market of South Korea, where its two million units sold so far leads the iPhone 4's 1.8 million sales. Hearty congratulations are due to the crew in Seoul, such success doesn't happen by chance, but let's keep working on those Froyo (and Gingerbread!) software updates as well, eh chaps?
InformationWeek
sourceThe Chosunibo
Leave A Comment
10 million, 10Million, 4-inch, android, galaxy s, GalaxyS, millions, sales, samsung, smartphone, sold
* Samsung pulls Froyo update for Bell’s Vibrant after reports of fried internal...
3 days ago
* Samsung Galaxy S receives Gingerbread port right from the Nexus S source (video)
4 days ago
* Android Skype update brings ability to run to SD, Galaxy S compatibility, but with a big...
6 days ago
From Our Partners
* Just Dance series sales have combined for an estimated 5 million units in US & UK
1 day ago
* Online Retailers See Big Holiday Spending Boost
1 day ago
* Red Dead Redemption shipments hit ’nearly’ 8 million units
6 days ago
blog comments powered by Disqus
Net neutrality: Verizon, AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile react
6 hours ago
Engadget's Holiday Anti-Gift Guide: Stuff you don't want
8 hours ago
Skyfire for iPad hands-on (video)
11 hours ago
webOS 2.0 for the Sprint Palm Pre leaks out, added features in tow
1 day ago
WakeMate review
1 day ago
SEE ALL
Nikon D7000 firmware update released, cools down 'hot pixels'
1 hour ago
FCC passes limited net neutrality rules, almost no one happy about them
1 day ago
Microsoft: over 1.5 million Windows Phone 7 devices sold to carriers and retailers
1 day ago
Motorola's 'Tablet Evolution' video teases some Honeycomb at CES
2 days ago
AT&T buys Qualcomm's FLO TV spectrum for a cool $1.9b, promises 4G awesomeness
2 days ago
SEE ALL
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
The worst name for a knockoff cellphone, ever
0
Net neutrality: Verizon, AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile react
0
Google haters, now's your chance for revenge
0
Samsung sells 9.3 million Galaxy S devices, within reaching distance of its lofty goal
0
Trending posts from Engadget on Twitter, updated hourly.
Meizu M9 ripped apart, out flies a Hummingbird processor -- Engadget
626
Sony's Kaz Hirai talks up virtues of touch controls, weighs in on PlayStation phone -- Engadget
447
Nikon D7000 firmware update released, cools down 'hot pixels' -- Engadget
262
Google adds AT&T billing to Android Market payment options -- Engadget
248
Mini Connected app hits iTunes, now you can finally hit the road -- Engadget
205
CIA's WTF to investigate impact of WikiLeaks -- Engadget
200
Joystiq
Download Raskulls early through ilomilo
Track BFBC2 Vietnam's 'Operation Hastings' unlock status
Divine Souls MMO will use Kinect on PC
Download Squad
Firefox 4 beta 3 for Android hands on: Mozilla browser hits the Market
Dwolla lets you send money to your Facebook or Twitter friends for a small flat fee
TweeSP generates an Amazon Christmas gift list for any Twitter user
TUAW
TUAW'€™s Holiday Gift Guide: For the would-be iOS developer
Pioneer releases 3D Blu-ray players controlled by iOS app
Stolen Mac tracking app Hidden free until January
DailyFinance
Last-Minute Shopping Boosts Online Holiday Sales 12%
Oil Breaches $90 a Barrel on Lower Inventory and Higher Demand
Abbott Laboratories Recalls 359 Million Diabetes Test Strips
Switched.com
Terry Gilliam Presents a New CG Steampunk Epic, How to Fly a Harrier
Shopping Tips: Know What You Want, Know How To Get It
Kobe Bryant to Star in 'Revolutionary' New Facebook Game
Autoblog
Video: How to Zombie-proof your car in the likely event of the apocalypse
J.D. Power: Styling biggest reason people reject Acura
Daily U-Turn: What you missed on 12.22.10
Fanhouse Main
Preakness Stakes Still With Us ... But It's On Life Support
FanHouse Live: MLB Free Agents, Brett Favre, Steve Nash's Future, Labor Issues
FanHouse Live: Analyzing Sports' Labor Issues
Asylum
Wild Chimps Play With Stick Dolls
Naughty or Nice -- The Ladies of SantaCon Have Dating Advice
Hot, Fresh Links -- Served When We Feel Like It
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, I read that post on Engadget too. It sucks that 8 million Galaxy S users probably don't know about Adobe Flash or the other improvements in Froyo.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
icm714 said:
Linpacks and quadrant have no real justice in there score I know most people love having the higher numbers but there just numbers. My buddy has a Samsung and his quadrant numbers are way better than my evo but I have mine set up so it flows better. Well for me it does. And for over clocking why That **** kills my battery quicker even if its set up like the best evo developers. Just find a rom and a kernal u like and u will be good I know most people like the cyanogen mod but alot of people also hate it.
Another thing can be u got a bad Samsung see if u can get a new one maybe that can get better scores if there thanlt important to you.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I completely agree with everything you said. There are positives for our phone, but I just decided to vent today
I did return my first Vibrant because it couldn't boot into recovery or download with hardware buttons (see my signature), and this new one works perfectly. But how can I like a company that failed to keep hardware-button recovery entry working, or possibly did that purposely to prevent tampering?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
androidcee123 said:
I can understand your frustration dude, I really can, but in the scheme of things, whether or you, or any one of us as an individual decides to not buy from them, the fact remains we helped this happen:
Samsung sells 9.3 million Galaxy S devices, within reaching distance of its lofty goal
By Vlad Savov posted Dec 22nd 2010 7:49PM
10 million freaking smartphones. Who thought, when Samsung put that number forward as its 2010 Galaxy S sales goal two months ago, that it was actually going to happen? Well, with just over a week left in the calendar year, the Korean giant has racked up 9.3 million sales of its Android superphone globally and actually expects to sneak past the mythical 10 million mark just before the champagne glasses start clinking. The Galaxy S has also scored a win in its home market of South Korea, where its two million units sold so far leads the iPhone 4's 1.8 million sales. Hearty congratulations are due to the crew in Seoul, such success doesn't happen by chance, but let's keep working on those Froyo (and Gingerbread!) software updates as well, eh chaps?
InformationWeek
sourceThe Chosunibo
Check out the link:
http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/22/samsung-sells-9-3-million-galaxy-s-devices-within-reaching-dist/
So I seriously doubt if you could stop them achieving their goals as an individual.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This happens when you put different phones with superficial similarities on virtually every major carrier around the globe, and call them all "Galaxy S" phones.
I guess the only qualification for being a Galaxy S phone is having a Hummingbird SoC and a sAMOLED screen, though...
PSP_Hacker said:
I did return my first Vibrant because it couldn't boot into recovery or download with hardware buttons (see my signature), and this new one works perfectly. But how can I like a company that failed to keep hardware-button recovery entry working, or possibly did that purposely to prevent tampering?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Versus what, a company that completely locks down its bootloader or one that turns unlocking it into an elaborate puzzle that frustrates devs' for months? I'm not sure why some Vibrants had the button issue, but I'm sure it was unintentional since quite a lot worked fine just out of the box. BTW, there is a flashable software fix for the issue. My phone didn't work either, but one flash and it's perfect.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Kubernetes said:
Versus what, a company that completely locks down its bootloader or one that turns unlocking it into an elaborate puzzle that frustrates devs' for months? I'm not sure why some Vibrants had the button issue, but I'm sure it was unintentional since quite a lot worked fine just out of the box. BTW, there is a flashable software fix for the issue. My phone didn't work either, but one flash and it's perfect.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If the phone works as advertised and the performance is good, there is little reason to mod the device, other than "because I can" or "I just feel like doing it."
A modded up Vibrant is only approaching the performance of the Droid X, but you had to go through hoops to get there, except they just had to turn their phones on and they don't need to stalk web forums to see when a new revision is out - they just wait for an OTA.
Hardware lock was the least of most people's worries, unless they got bricked by an OTA update.
The reason the Manufacturers go through hoops to lock down bootloaders is because people on forums like these have no issues telling others to lie to Carriers and Manufacturers to get new phones when they brick their phones flashing ROMs, etc. linked here.
There is valid reason for the locked bootloaders.
If we weren't all human, perhaps those reasons wouldn't exist.
If you base a phones value or performance quadrant or linpack you should cook the apks to give tou 4000 every time.....
Those benchmarks are pointless
Vibrant + Nero V3 + SuperIO Kernel
I was just going to make a thread about how I like my galaxy s
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
N8ter said:
I can assure you that my sex life is great.
But I'm wondering why it's on your mind.
Feeling deprived, lately?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope just think making a topic bashing Samsung is pointless. No one cares that you hate Samsung.but I can tell you that Samsung is a million times better then Motorola.heard of the motorola cliq? Now that's something to b!tch about.worse device in history.went through 5 of em in like 5 months. Now that's a piece of crap. Anyways who cares!
And PS. Apple Pie don't count!
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I completely understand your frustration because Samsung absolutely sucks when it comes to customer service and product support. I have a TV and mp3 player made by them and have had to deal with the terrible CS on those devices. The problem is that over 9 million people have been roped into buying Galaxy S devices and quite a few of them came from lower end phone so they believe it's be best thing since sliced bread. The last two people I know that got the Vibrant and Fascinate came from a low end Nokia and Moto Razr, respectively. Having real web instead of WAP and apps is a whole new world to them. We are a passionate, but small minority in the grand scheme of things. If I mention things like JIT optimization to most GS owners I know, I just get blank stares I like my phone and appreciate the time and effort the devs here spend on improving the user experience. I happened to fall into a free MT4G, so I'm going to give it a shot against the Vibrant (loser's going on eBay). I just wish that Samsung made a phone that you can mod if you choose to, not one that you have to mod to get the user experience and software you deserve out of the box. As a long suffering Cubs fan, I've hear "wait 'til next year" too many times in my lifetime and "froyo's coming soon" is essentially the same thing. It could happen, but I'm not going to put money on it.
darkside79 said:
Nope just think making a topic bashing Samsung is pointless. No one cares that you hate Samsung.but I can tell you that Samsung is a million times better then Motorola.heard of the motorola cliq? Now that's something to b!tch about.worse device in history.went through 5 of em in like 5 months. Now that's a piece of crap. Anyways who cares!
And PS. Apple Pie don't count!
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For every cliq there is a behold and omnia hd.
3 vibrants in 2 weeks before I got one worth keeping.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I definitely appreciate the OP's feelings on this issue. I upgraded from a Vibrant to a Nexus One as my daily driver and have been incredibly happy with it. I'm holding onto the Vibrant for now hoping that the froyo update will magically fix all its issue, but god only knows when/if that's even going to come.
It's possible that the partnership with Google will lead the Nexus S to not suck in the same manner, but I'm honestly not even considering that device at the moment due to how the Vibrant has played out. The truth of it is this: with most manufacturers, I give them the benefit of the doubt. I assume the product will mostly work, and if there's a software problem I assume it will be fixed. By giving Samsung the benefit of the doubt with the Vibrant, I got burned, and I kept the device until after the return period, waiting for an update that never came.
I won't say that I'll never buy another Samsung phone again - never is a long time after all - but I'm certainly going to think twice about it. And I'm certainly never believing any excuses from Samsung about fixing things after release, ever again. Either it works perfectly out of the box, or it goes back to the store.
Dude who cares about Cyanogens progress? Have you not checked out the awesomeness that is Team Whiskey or Eugene? IMHO Team Whiskey blows Cyanogen out of the water. I came from a mytouch 3g and was worried when I got my vibrant about the quality of roms and devs that would be available. Well let me just say after flashing my first Team Whiskey rom, ill never go back to anything else. Might I suggest Obsidian v 4.2 (froyo) or Nero v3 (gingerbread based but not actual gingerbread). Both are awesome especially couples with voodoo or oclf
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I could see the OP being upset about the slowness of the releasing a FINAL 2.2 update (they've graced us with enough good leaks for me to not care). The rest is nonsense that mostly has nothing to do with Samsung.
If you wanted even more devs releasing even more unfinished junk for your phone you most certainly should've gotten an HTC phone so you can flash your heart out every day on junk that almost never reaches a final status.

Just how bad is Samsung with updates?

I've been disgusted by Samsung's lack of support of this phone or any phone they've released in the US. When the galaxy S line came out in the US, I encouraged everyone to buy them because they were such good phones. Well they were good on Eclair when they came out and didn't really fix all the problems in the extremely delayed Froyo release. I still laugh to my self when I remember asking the Sprint salesman when the Epic will get Froyo and he said "by the end of September" (I bought it September 9th). For anyone that uses the "best hardware" bs excuse I don't care. I want my phone to work not to have the "best hardware". The keyboard still doesn't work properly and that's the only reason I bought this stupid phone. Anyway, I was looking at this androidcentral article about fragmentation and I noticed something interesting; Samsung has only updated ONE phone to gingerbread in the US. Just one phone on one carrier, the Droid Charge. The other Samsung phones on gingerbread are the ones that launched with it. I would never in my life buy another Samsung phone but unfortunately the Nexus Prime is made by Samsung so they'll have to get my money again. I'm definitely buying the Prime next month and either smashing this epic piece of s**t to pieces with a hammer or donating it to a developer. Probably the latter since I've been dying to have a fully functional cm7 build for months.
Sources:
http://www.androidcentral.com/dear-molly-rants-lets-talk-about-android-fragmentation
They are bad... The worst IMO. Its all because of the "UI's they put on. But if the prime comes to sprint i will be buying it. I assume the prime will NOT have touchwiz. But we will see, I at lease hope because it does not have a keyboard it should have CM7 soon.
Samsung is known for its prominent hardware manufacture ability.
If they had deep software capability, they would've not use android to sell their phones.
They're strategy is to own other handset manufacturers with superior hardware qualities like SAMOLED, curved screen, thinness, etc..
After they sell their product to customers, they just do enough support to prevent a riot.
So for the software updates, you can't expect from Samsung. It is waste of money for their view. Just make the next one with Gingerbread or ICS and sell 'em.
Want proof? Search for Omnia 2 that was sold as "iPhone killer" in Korea. It had Winmo 6.5 on it. People had to be stuck with it for two years, and by that time even Microsoft dropped Winmo and got Windows 7. If you search in youtube, you can see people video hitting the Omnia 2 with hammer.
Moral of the story? Don't expect awesome software supports from Samsung.
Get nexus.
They are definitely becoming better. The Omnia thing is a pretty bad example (Samsung didn't say the device was an iPhone killer, it had Windows Mobile on it (an OS by Microsoft which wasn't very elegant and Microsoft didn't bring updates very often, in fact 6.5 was the latest version and Microsoft killed it, what could Samsung have done about it? An update to the completely different WP7 years later was practically impossible and never promised by anyone). Plus, it is an old example, things can change totally in the smartphone world in some months. SGS1 users -especially in the US- had to wait extraordinarily long for Gingerbread but it feels like the whole thing has become better (rather subjective but also visible in terms of the SGS2).
In the end most over the average users didn't know that Gingerbread existed and didn't miss much, the Galaxy S1 was certainly no bad phone, hardware- and softwarewise. And all those Geeks who are longing for every little update and who read and post here in the forums are probably more happy if they just install another ROM.
First off Samsung makes the Nexus. 2nd off Samsung is great with updates....if you don't have a US carrier or Touchwiz. European Galaxy S phones have had Gingerbread for 6 months. Nexus gets very timely updates. To judge a company on 1 out of the thousands of products they make is being very single-minded. All the major US carriers Galaxy S line have not been updated. When we didn't get Froyo for 6 months Sprint blamed Samsung and Samsung blamed Sprint. This phone was the 1st Galaxy S to get Froyo then they took it back and T-mobile got theirs then Sprint. So obviously there are issues when dealing with Touchwiz, FCC hardware restrictions and the carriers. For all we know Sprint is holding onto the OTA because they are having equipment maintenance issues across the country an want to wait until they are fully operational. The 99% of Epic owners are oblivious to what Gingerbread even is so Sprint figures it can wait a few weeks.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
kennyglass123 said:
First off Samsung makes the Nexus. 2nd off Samsung is great with updates....if you don't have a US carrier or Touchwiz. European Galaxy S phones have had Gingerbread for 6 months. Nexus gets very timely updates. To judge a company on 1 out of the thousands of products they make is being very single-minded. All the major US carriers Galaxy S line have not been updated. When we didn't get Froyo for 6 months Sprint blamed Samsung and Samsung blamed Sprint. This phone was the 1st Galaxy S to get Froyo then they took it back and T-mobile got theirs then Sprint. So obviously there are issues when dealing with Touchwiz, FCC hardware restrictions and the carriers. For all we know Sprint is holding onto the OTA because they are having equipment maintenance issues across the country an want to wait until they are fully operational. The 99% of Epic owners are oblivious to what Gingerbread even is so Sprint figures it can wait a few weeks.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All excuses, if other manufacturers like HTC and Motorola can push gingerbread updates in a timely manner then Samsung should be able to as well. I'm not judging them on one product, I'm basing my argument on every phone they released in the US. I know Samsung makes the Nexus S and the Nexus Prime... I clearly stated that in the OP. Clearly you have trouble reading and/or comprehending written statements.
What makes it even more pathetic on their part is that they've had a phone with gingerbread on it with essentially the same hardware as the other galaxy S phones for almost 10 months and still nothing. Just ****ty leaks with tons of things not working. I know the international version has had it for a while and it's been working out well for them but why such a delay with the US market? It's a huge market when it comes to mobile and they've sold millions of handsets here. They clearly could care less about what happens in the US which is why I'm always perplexed when people drool over new Samsung phones. I can't help but laugh when I hear ZOMG EXYNOS DUAL CORE, IT CAN RUN THE INTERNET! Too bad all that processing power won't save you from ****ty programming and no updates.
Okay okay no need to take things personally.
We all are dissatisfied customers.
About Samsung's omnia 2 reference, I am pointing out that Samsung only focuses on delivering phones with high specs on paper. it is quite obvious that Winmo 6.x was crap and having it on the flagship phone at the time is like shooting yourself on the foot. Indeed nobody promised upgrade from winmo 6.x, however it's their arrogance/ignorance that gets me. They are like "we can make phone with better cpu+scree+build quality, so we are better". This approach worked for them 5~10 years ago, but not anymore. At this time of age, I want real quality product that can bring quality experience. That means hardware alone can't cut it.
It's a fact that Samsung does provide quality hardware. However, they certainly are poor at anything software. In fact they don't have any quality software to show because they don't. Touchwiz is not even a standalone OS, its just a skin/theme.
So how do Samsung try to compete with phones like iPhone? Take the idea, slap better cpu/gpu on it and stamping out phones like a crazy factory, with their massive hardware manufacturing capability. How many samsung phones we have now? And how many of them actually beat iPhones?
Galaxy S2 is very close but it is safe to say that none of them are as optimized as iPhone.
I just don't like their business style of just producing phones with highest and newest technology on it but don't care about fine tuning and optimizing the whole system.
Look at Epic 4G. It had so much capability with keyboard, good front facing camera, Wimax 4G, awesome 1ghz hummingbird cpu. But in fact they are all good on paper, but in real life experience, they fail to utilized completely.
What's good if I have the keyboard if it ignores key inputs. What's good to have ffc if like apps such as Skype don't support it (now it does, but man.. after like 10 months of ownership...?). What's good with all the cpu if the OS is not optimized and I have to install custom roms/patches to get the phone to be snappy.
The point is... Samsung can't deliver iphone killer alone.
Buy nexus, because it is combination of samsung's hardware capability with Google's software capability.
A person that takes to insults clearly has nothing intelligent to say.
FYI if you read your own thread I was responding to post 3 that said don't expect awesome updates from Samsung, get Nexus. Now who can't read or comprehend?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
kennyglass123 said:
A person that takes to insults clearly has nothing intelligent to say.
FYI if you read your own thread I was responding to post 3 that said don't expect awesome updates from Samsung, get Nexus. Now who can't read or comprehend?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In case you were unaware nexus phones software updates come from google not the manufacturer.. Be it htc or samsung... So yes if you are unhappy about sammy updating the software a nexus phone is a viable alternative... Do your homework before you insult...
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Thank you. Wish more people were polite and helpful here.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
kennyglass123 said:
First off Samsung makes the Nexus. 2nd off Samsung is great with updates....if you don't have a US carrier or Touchwiz. European Galaxy S phones have had Gingerbread for 6 months. Nexus gets very timely updates. To judge a company on 1 out of the thousands of products they make is being very single-minded. All the major US carriers Galaxy S line have not been updated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Umm, this is America. We're on American carrier(s). We spend American money on this crap. Most of us ARE in fact American (or at least legal residents I would hope). In fact, after a few more beers I may even argue that supporting a foreign company's actions in this case is treason and punishable by being hanged.
Based on the above paragraph, I think we're well within our rights to judge Samsung on their American product support - which is basically non existent. Of the 3 Samsung phones I've ever owned, the only one worth a **** is the Captivate and that's only because it has fully working CM7. I won't waste anyone's time going into detail on my Epic gripes, and we all know (and probably furiously hate) the Moment.
But to diversify (and/or digress) just for a moment. I've had 2 Samsung DVD players that were complete crap and were returned. They were replaced with LG's that I am pretty impressed with. Also, my Samsung fridge makes me want to bash puppies every time I use the water dispenser.
OK, then why keep supporting them? Stop buying Samsung dude! I was just trying to note that there is more to it then just Samsung not updating the Galaxy S phones in the US. By all the RDFs it certainly isn't for lack of trying. Since the same thing happened on froyo, what really slows it down? Touchwiz? FCC hardware regs? They hate the US because Apple is based here? What really is the hold up? What is the real reason Europe gets it first?
Oh, I will stop supporting them. Epic 4g will be my last phone from Samsung.
Sir Alphonse said:
Oh, I will stop supporting them. Epic 4g will be my last phone from Samsung.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK. Out of curiosity which manufacturer will you try next? I also am not thrilled with supporting Samsung. I just don't think they are totally at fault. HTC rushes out updates that don't work and some claim make the phones unuseable. So are you thinking LG or Motorola?
Sir Alphonse said:
Oh, I will stop supporting them. Epic 4g will be my last phone from Samsung.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nexus Prime > all
And Nexus Legendary might be next Oo
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda premium
kennyglass123 said:
OK, then why keep supporting them? Stop buying Samsung dude! I was just trying to note that there is more to it then just Samsung not updating the Galaxy S phones in the US. By all the RDFs it certainly isn't for lack of trying. Since the same thing happened on froyo, what really slows it down? Touchwiz? FCC hardware regs? They hate the US because Apple is based here? What really is the hold up? What is the real reason Europe gets it first?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We'll never know what the hold up is... For all we know they killed Jobs too.
And no, I no longer support them. Going back to your earlier point, I try not to judge them based on one product. The DVD players were crap, so they were returned. The fridge worked great for the 1st year or so before I started having problems with it (and if you think their mobile devices tech support is bad, try large appliances!). On the phones, the Moment I thought was a fluke of a bad phone, but it turned into a support nightmare. At least Sprint credited me back on that one. I thought the Epic would be a big improvement. While there was significant improvement on their part, they still suck IMHO.
In the grand scheme of things I own a HUGE amount of high tech devices. The amount of "support" I've shown Samsung with the 6 products I have bought (and 3 I've actually kept) is roughly equal to a pint of piss in the ocean. I won't write off a company based on 1 bad experience - I believe in 3 strikes and you're out and the Epic was #3.
At the end of the day, the only Samsung product I've bought and actually like is the Captivate. Ironically it's the only Samsung device I bought second hand (and behind a liquor store in a shady part of town at that).
While I'm thinking about it. I had a Philips Plasma TV which is now in pieces in my basement. About 95% of it's internals are Samsung manufactured and that thing was a steaming pile of baby ****. I now have 2 Panasonic TV's that I absolutely love.
---------- Post added at 09:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:55 PM ----------
kennyglass123 said:
OK. Out of curiosity which manufacturer will you try next? I also am not thrilled with supporting Samsung. I just don't think they are totally at fault. HTC rushes out updates that don't work and some claim make the phones unuseable. So are you thinking LG or Motorola?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Motorola for me. They may not have the fanciest screens but some close and quite technical friends of mine have the Droid 2, Droid X and their kids have Droid 3's. Yes, my SAMOLED's blow the Moto's screen away, but their phones have been quite reliable.
Also, I've been a fan of Motorola for a looooong time. My Nextel's took a brutal beating on a daily basis. I have no idea why my Razr's took all their abuse and survived. The radio's I installed in taxi cabs back in the early to mid 90's were not only rugged as all hell, but fairly high tech for their time in how they handled channel hopping and things. In my decade or so in cable we used TONS (literally tons) of their equipment and it always proved to be reliable. Not to mention the Motorola radio's that went to the battlefields and into space. That company knows how to build a damn fine RF device. I should have never strayed away from them.
Point taken. Funny thing was I bought a Samsung bluetooth headset. The ear hook snapped in half within 90 days and Samsung told me that is not included in the warranty and wanted to sell me a ear hook for $6. I told them to go screw themselves and would never buy another Samsung product. Then the Epic came out...LOL.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
kennyglass123 said:
Point taken. Funny thing was I bought a Samsung bluetooth headset. The ear hook snapped in half within 90 days and Samsung told me that is not included in the warranty and wanted to sell me a ear hook for $6. I told them to go screw themselves and would never buy another Samsung product. Then the Epic came out...LOL.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Figures, the only movable part is not covered? Douchenozzles....
FWIW, I've always been happy with Plantronics devices. I have 2 of their BT earpieces for my mobile phones and use their CS50 series on my Avaya and Cisco endpoints.
kennyglass123 said:
OK. Out of curiosity which manufacturer will you try next? I also am not thrilled with supporting Samsung. I just don't think they are totally at fault. HTC rushes out updates that don't work and some claim make the phones unuseable. So are you thinking LG or Motorola?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If the google merger goes through, I would go with Motorola.
The thing that pissed me off was it sounded like it happened all the time. Got a package of 3 ear hooks for $6 from ebay instead of giving it to them for 1. But yeah, heard Plantonics makes good bluetooths.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

Galaxy Tab 2????

REALLY??!!! SERIOUSLY????!!! How many tablets does Sammy think they need to through out at the public to get that they aren't going to sell until they lower prices, not specs! End rant.
Lower prices? The 10.1 is $50 cheaper than the iPad and the 8.9 is $100 cheaper...
I think they are currently priced just about right...
Wish they lowered the prices on the older tabs significantly.
Means we can root em and flash our own builds for a reasonable price
they are just making fools of the peoples who took tabs recently ....i got my first tab SGT p1000 first then few months later this 10.1 came up i took that traded for my p1000 now this 7.7 got infrared and can do calls too..god they gonna make me trade my 10.1 too
i agree, i think this is the only problem with android, we are being flooded with devices at them moment, hopefully it will slow down and we can see some more quality devices come out... pricing for samsungs tabs though are great i think, leave the lower market to other companies, I want a powerful device in my hands.
Yeah but they just need to take a break for a moment
Sent from my GT-P7500 using xda premium
yogeshmha said:
they are just making fools of the peoples who took tabs recently ....i got my first tab SGT p1000 first then few months later this 10.1 came up i took that traded for my p1000 now this 7.7 got infrared and can do calls too..god they gonna make me trade my 10.1 too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hold up though... The Galaxy Tab 2 is 7.7", dual core, 1ghz ram etc etc... right?
I bought mine a few weeks ago and did so because I read the new Galaxy Tab would be 7.7". I definitely wanted the 10" form factor. I love my Tab but don't want to be a fool (not that kind anyway)! Now I'm second guessing purchase
yogeshmha said:
they are just making fools of the peoples who took tabs recently ....i got my first tab SGT p1000 first then few months later this 10.1 came up i took that traded for my p1000 now this 7.7 got infrared and can do calls too..god they gonna make me trade my 10.1 too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is exactly what I mean! Sammy has now released like 5 new tablets with same basic hardware of their old tablets.. Tegra 3 is ready and being used by Asus already! I like Samsung's hardware the best, but I'm just sick of seeing *New tablets with underwhelming, old hardware in them.. I know that price is def a factor, but manufacturing 20 different tablets is expensive.. if they had 3 form factors/models it would save money for them, and then us!
glassjosh said:
Tegra 3 is ready and being used by Asus already!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nvidia's on record saying they've lost Samsung as a customer and now consider them a competitor. So, don't hold your breath for Teg3. Teg3 is actually two old-gen A9 chips glommed together. Samsung's Exynos 5250 is in sampling making it the first A15 chip on the market when it’s supposed to release in Q2. Raw HP isn't the real issue with mobile devices. It's GPU bandwidth. A15 chips will be more powerful than Teg3 and have 5x the graphics b/w. I think a lot of manufacturers are intentionally skipping Teg3 and moving directly to A15 chips (from Samsung, TI, and Qualcomm) which are easier to fabricate and potentially less expensive. The Prime’s having a ton of issues where different devices behave differently when updates are rolled out. It’s too early to say its Teg3 but it’s a potential candidate for the problems.
Meh, I like choice. I don't see the point of complaining about it; unless you're an early adopter, you'll always be a step behind. Here' my suggestion for you: stop worrying about having the newest snazziest gear and enjoy what you do have. It's not a race.
slack04 said:
Meh, I like choice. I don't see the point of complaining about it; unless you're an early adopter, you'll always be a step behind. Here' my suggestion for you: stop worrying about having the newest snazziest gear and enjoy what you do have. It's not a race.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not abt race its just we buy a thing today and tomorrow they come up with the improvised one unfair u know
Sent from my GT-P7500 using xda premium
yogeshmha said:
It's not abt race its just we buy a thing today and tomorrow they come up with the improvised one unfair u know
Sent from my GT-P7500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"Unfair" would suggest they owe you some duty of not producing new models. Have you really thought this through? "We buy a thing today, and tomorrow they come up with the improv[ed] one." If this is unfair, how long do they have to wait? Do you realize that they released this tablet in May of 2011, 9 months ago, right? You also realize that the successor does not yet exist, right? This is the same complaint I've heard about technology for the last 20 years. I still don't get it.
BarryH_GEG said:
Nvidia's on record saying they've lost Samsung as a customer and now consider them a competitor. So, don't hold your breath for Teg3. Teg3 is actually two old-gen A9 chips glommed together. Samsung's Exynos 5250 is in sampling making it the first A15 chip on the market when it’s supposed to release in Q2. Raw HP isn't the real issue with mobile devices. It's GPU bandwidth. A15 chips will be more powerful than Teg3 and have 5x the graphics b/w. I think a lot of manufacturers are intentionally skipping Teg3 and moving directly to A15 chips (from Samsung, TI, and Qualcomm) which are easier to fabricate and potentially less expensive. The Prime’s having a ton of issues where different devices behave differently when updates are rolled out. It’s too early to say its Teg3 but it’s a potential candidate for the problems.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
BUT there is ALWAYS something better around the corner. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Nuff said. I agree Samsungs SOC will be better, but will it be too late? Look at Windows Phone 7, its great, but 3-4 years too late..
My main point..
Is Samsung going to seriously produce 20 different models of tablets? I understand it being nice to have 'choices', but Samsung has enough work keeping past models firmware relevant, let alone producing 20 new version/sizes every few months, there is no way they can properly support that many.. I wouldn't think twice is they made actually changes to new models like vastly improved batteries, or more memory etc.
I've been saying for many years that if you buy an electronic device, it will be obsolete BEFORE you make it out of the front door of the store. You might make it back home if you buy the most expensive model of whatever. It's just the way of high tech devices these days. We consumers have only helped them by replacing perfectly functional devices just for the lasted and greatest one. Even if the new one has twice the speed or memory, do you need it?
Probably not. Yet we continue to demand, and purchase, which is just encouragement for them to continue. I honestly think its only gonna get worse. It's really our fault as consumers always wanting more and better; NOW.
When I was growing up electronics were durable goods. You bought a TV and you kept it until it quit working. Now we buy a new one because of widget xyz is better on the new model. I'm guilty of this myself also, just not as much as I used to be. Even though I have more money to spend these days.
If you see this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
slack04 said:
"Unfair" would suggest they owe you some duty of not producing new models. Have you really thought this through? "We buy a thing today, and tomorrow they come up with the improv[ed] one." If this is unfair, how long do they have to wait? Do you realize that they released this tablet in May of 2011, 9 months ago, right? You also realize that the successor does not yet exist, right? This is the same complaint I've heard about technology for the last 20 years. I still don't get it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems u got loads of money in ur bank! If it's overloading send me i will bug new tab every day
Sent from my GT-P7500 using xda premium
yogeshmha said:
It seems u got loads of money in ur bank! If it's overloading send me i will bug new tab every day
Sent from my GT-P7500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you can encourage the manufacturers to do more of what you're b!tching about more? :what:
If you see this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
yogeshmha said:
It seems u got loads of money in ur bank! If it's overloading send me i will bug new tab every day
Sent from my GT-P7500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's ridiculous. If you knew me you'd know what a silly thing to say that is. But beyond that, my statement is exactly the opposite: I'm saying "be happy with what you have, not unhappy about what you don't have." See if you can figure out the difference between gadget lust and gadget envy.
Didn't mean any offense if it was taken that way. Just good natured hard time I was intending.
Sometimes hard to relay sarcasm in a post.
If you see this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
OP puts Galaxy Tab 2 in the title, then complains about how many tablets are coming out from Samsung? I mean, if you put Galaxy Note 10.1 in the title, that would make some sense, but the Galaxy Tab 2 is apparently the direct successor of the original Galaxy Tab that came out in 2010 and it's not even out yet. Who knows when it comes out.

after galaxy note you will buy any Samsung mobile phone?

after galaxy note you will buy any Samsung mobile phone?
Seeing how the note is my third Sammy, probably. Not.a fan of Samsung's plastic choices but hardware wise, I like them.
depends on whats available at the time
My last Samsung here. The updates are so slow. It is like running Gingerbread back from the 1920s. There is no excitement with my device. I know some of you are iPhone haters but at least they can update and release new features in one day. Google need to smack Samsung down a little.
Yes I will - Note II / Note Plus
Samsung has always managed to appeal to my design sense and build pretty neat hardware into their phones. I've had a D900, U600, (LG KU990 in between here) Omnia II, SGS and now the Note. The D900 was a fantastic looking, robust little phone which I still have, and the U600 was pretty much the same but with a redesign and a spec bump so I had that as well. Omnia II was my first taste of smartphones and I loved it. Once Android took off in a big way, I hopped on and haven't been disappointed since.
The Note is great. Beautiful screen, massive battery and runs like butter. The new HTC OneX looks cool and comes pretty close to ticking all my boxes but the S-Pen was the clincher. I scribble faster than I can type and I have a screen of S-Memos to remind me about everything from shopping lists to memos to breathing in and out.
The delays on ICS have been a downer but GB still runs great and as a device, still goes on well. Samsung is making up for it by giving us a premium suite of features which weren't even on the radar when I bought the device so I'm not going to complain. So... Note 2? Yes please.
4Nde said:
My last Samsung here. The updates are so slow. It is like running Gingerbread back from the 1920s. There is no excitement with my device. I know some of you are iPhone haters but at least they can update and release new features in one day. Google need to smack Samsung down a little.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hehe, and most things apples patches do is stop jailbreak..
Not to big things in the small ones they send out, and 4s still have crappy battery even if they say they working on it..
Not a iPhone hater here tho, gf have one and even my daughter as they are very simple and child friendly..
Skickat från min GT-N7000 via Tapatalk 2
4Nde said:
My last Samsung here. The updates are so slow. It is like running Gingerbread back from the 1920s. There is no excitement with my device. I know some of you are iPhone haters but at least they can update and release new features in one day. Google need to smack Samsung down a little.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung is great compared to Dell. The Note has only been out 5-6 months. Took Dell over a year to update the Streak5 from 1.5 to 1.6 (Froyo). I don't think there has been a GB update for Dell Streak5. If Sammy is faster than a year, they're doing great! Which other Android manufacturer updates more quickly?
Besides, GB is working quite well IMHO. And the Note is well made and everything seems to work! I'm in for the next round.
kraz
4Nde said:
My last Samsung here. The updates are so slow. It is like running Gingerbread back from the 1920s. There is no excitement with my device. I know some of you are iPhone haters but at least they can update and release new features in one day. Google need to smack Samsung down a little.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course this is your personal opinion and it´s absolutely okay to think like this...but people have to face the fact, that ICS isn´t THE invention of the century, it is more like a small update that makes it possible to install the apex launcher (and some small more stuff ). And beside this, I do not know any manufacturer that provides faster updates to their users (ignoring apple for a moment).
The Note as well as the S2 are two MONSTERS of devices! An incredible camera, snappy/fast/smooth, resistant and even with GB they are still the headliners on the market. Ignoring some apps, there´s nothing to miss atm, it is more about nerdy minds to always be on the newest trip. And: We bought a GB device, so they don´t owe us anything.
BTW: Just check the S2 user com...e.g. the quality of the cam got worse with ICS...and as a matter of fact I do not know ANY smartphone with ICS that beats the S2/Note cam quality atm. I want a device that is WORKING and that delivers some functions which I can really USE within the day. And that´s exactely what samsung delivers imao...
So in my case: Yes, i will stay with samsung...
after my current note, next one will be maybe galaxy s3, if it wont give me satisfaction,will be waiting for note 2 : )
Samsung are making good handsets lately,but I have learnt one important lesson here with my first Samsung Phone ever:Get your bread direct from the Bakery !!.
Meaning,it is always a wise decision to get your phone from a dedicated manufavturer,not from some company who beeing busy in making washing machines,TVs cameras etc..have no time left to support certain devices.
last three devices are all samsung. I have htc work phone which i hate.
I want a phone that works and will last long enough for me to sell on fleabay. I couldnt care less regarding the operating system i.e GB and ics, aint the end of the world at all,
Take a look at Asus and the transformer, they update faster than anyone great huh, hmmm shame about the hardware. As they say you can polish a turd but its still a turd.
Give me solid hardware at a good price, and thats what samsung nail every time
Bring on note2... Can't wait til October... Bring it...
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
And whats wrong with HD2,I have been using it for the last 3 years now and is still working like a Swiss watch,I have flashed at different times many OSs on it,just changed back to WM from Miui's ICS,sorry if I offend anyone here but being a 78 years old veteran I bear a special affection at my heart for the WM.
Damn,my wife's Galaxy Tab 10.1 3G is still on Honeycomb 3,1 while my son's have been updated to 3,2 months ago!! and when side by side you can easily observe how inferior the former is in comparison.
I had a couple of Htc smartphones, then an S2, and now the Note. Hated the Htc's, loved the S2, and like the Note even more. So my next phone will probably be the Note 2, unless somebody comes up with something like the Note but better.
Sent from my GT-N7000
Meh...maybe...
The thing is, the Note is a beautiful phone and i would have bought it no matter what company made it. This is my first sammy phone and it could be the first of many or the last one. As long as the community on xda is strong and the phone itself is amazing i couldn't care less about the company. I have to say though, Samsung has come pretty dam far in the last few years, its unbelievable.
For me, it really depends on how Samsung handles this whole broken-kernels-that-destroy-eMMC fiasco.
If Samsung remains silent on the issue, the Note will likely be my last Samsung device. If another broken kernel manages to get through testing and is officially released (see the SHW-M250S/K/L sources), the Note is guaranteed to be my last Samsung device.
While I don't like their hardware design, nor do I like their historical track record, Sony's recent history of developer support has been highly commendable, and if Samsung keeps blowing it with regards to their total noncooperation with developers, I'll be making the jump with my next device.
Yes, and to be more specific, i will wait for Note 2. I was a HTC fan but, lately, it did not impress me. HTC ONE x , because it uses tegra 3, it is a flop, in my opinion, inefficent and power hungry CPU, no were near Exinox refinament. Samsung offers something witch is crucial for me.. good low light video camera (no ghosting) and USB OTG.
Samsung make good phones overall. Nobody makes a perfect device. Just levels of tolerances that one accepts. I have had 2 other Samsung phones and they were excellent, really excellent. Tbh whilst I want ICS I couldn't care that much since ginger bread is stable. And I prefer stable over everything else.
I probably won't be getting another phone until my Note dies - I love it that much. If Sammy are still top of the heap by then I will probably go the Sammy route again.
I also don't really understand the whole 'Samsung lied to us stuff'. I've struggled to find anything from Samsung that said they'd deliver ICS on the Note by the end of Q1 2012, everything I've found is hearsay or relating to Samsung devices generally (i.e. We'll start rolling out ICS updates in Q1.)
Well they haven't lied. The SGS2, the phone with the largest user-base was updated first... And the phone with all the extra complications of a screen approx four times the size and with a stylus, etc has been delayed. Not a surprise to me - only to those who bought a device with one OS version thinking it would have another IMMEDIATELY!
Its not even like ICS is much better... I flashed ICS Stunner and within a week I was back on stock GB. ICS offers a few good touches (bookmark sync, slightly better UI performance, data usage limits, face unlock (which p***ed me off mo end), etc) but basically its still Android and we've already got that.

[Q] Are we really that blind?

I've seen a ton of Android users bashing "iSheep" over the years for their undying loyalty and "sheepism" (if there is such a word) for the way that they foam at the mouth for every new Apple product that gets released. It seems that no matter what the reviews or competing products show them, they run out and buy that new iProduct as soon as it hits the shelves.
I've started to wonder if us Nexus fans aren't exactly the same.. here we have a brand new Nexus 4 coming out, and let's be honest most of the reviews are not on the positive side. I've seen the numerous justifications about how the test phones weren't running the most "optimized" software, how the reviewer(s) were Apple fan boys, how the final product won't be anything like the test phones..
However, when I started recounting my experiences with the Nexus brand, I have to say I think we are putting our blinders on due to the excitement of having a new Nexus with decent specs. Case point:
When I decided to buy the Galaxy Nexus I was extremely excited to finally get my hands on the "Pure Android Experience". Coming from the Galaxy SII, I had some high expectations of what I top notch smart phone should be - but I also had high hopes given the Gnex specs. When the day my Gnex arrived, I couldn't get the box open fast enough! Then low and behold - the phone was DOA. Wouldn't even power on, nothing. No long press, multiple press, extended charging, nada. Quickly called Google and was sent a replacement two days later.
When the replacement arrived, it powered up just fine (thank God..) and I began getting it all set up. Almost immediately I noticed it didn't seem as responsive as my Galaxy SII. The touch screen lacked the sensitivity of the SII, but I thought to myself, I can deal with that - hey, it's a Nexus! The colors seems a bit off to me, but I thought "it's probably just the auto-brightness". It was only after setting the phone up completely that I noticed the urine-colored whites and the muted colors. I thought to myself, "well, everyone says the Galaxy SII is over saturated anyway.." although I wasn't too convinced. It just didn't seem to have the "WOW" factor the SII had. Still, I carried on - after all.. it's a Nexus!
Three weeks later and I'm starting to get pissy about the Gnex. Reception just wasn't as good, seemed to run things slightly slower than my SII, DL speeds were slower than my SII, the touch screen responsiveness (or lack thereof) had simply become annoying. That coupled with the so-so screen quality and everything started to get to me. Dissatisfaction was growing at this point..
Finally I couldn't take it anymore. Sold my Gnex on XDA for $350 shipped and guess what? The very next day it drops to $350 in the Play Store. Felt really bad for the guy who bought mine, but since I keep my phones pristine I'm sure he was OK with it. Plus he saved tax + shipping.
So I immediately went out and bought the Galaxy SIII on release day. OH. MY. GOD. I had my phone back. It was like the SII only bigger. Better. Faster. Touch screen responsiveness and screen was simply amazing. Everything flew on this phone, no matter what I threw at it. Fell in love with Android all over again.
Three weeks ago I went and bought the Nexus 7. I thought, surely the reports of the QC issues are slightly exaggerated since XDA is such a small portion of the consumer population.. they're just a little more anal, a little more OCD about their devices (at least this is what I am reading by the members aggressively defending the Nexus 7). I'm sure it will be fine!
My first Nexus 7 has such bad light bleed I immediately returned it. Bad luck, I thought. I'm sure this isn't the norm. After all, I didn't have any screen lift.. right? My 2nd Nexus 7 - Ahh, perfection. No light bleed, no screen lift, everything looks great. Well, except for the slightly washed out colors and over saturated whites. But hey, it's LCD so what do I expect right? Besides... it's a Nexus!
Sure enough, here I am three weeks later, and the same light bleed in the lower left corner has manifested, along with a slight screen lift on the upper left hand side. I haven't removed the back to check for missing screws yet, but I am sure I will find it is the same as others have reported.. I won't be returning this one as I have decided to live with it even though it aggravates me every time I see it.
So here I am at the impasse.. I have the Galaxy SIII, which is what I consider the best phone on the market (besides perhaps the Note 2) running CM10 Jellybean 4.1.2 flawlessly.. and yet the Nexus name is calling to me again.
WHY IN THE WORLD should I expect things to be different this time? Why would I choose to ignore the reviews and believe other Nexus fan boys who say it's the "test phones" and software that is "not optimized", and that it's not the "final product"?
There's only ONE reason I can think of. Because I am a God damn Google fanatic that keeps ignoring reality in the hopes that everyone is wrong and this will be the best Android phone ever. But we all know that it won't... don't we?
I'm giving Google one last chance to impress the hell outta me. After this, if things turn out like they have in the past, I'm sorry to say it but... I will be a Samsung fan from now on. Yes, they did make the Gnex.. and it was inferior.. but honestly it's probably because they were putting everything into their Galaxy S line to steal the show, which IMO they have done quite successfully.
Don't let me down Google. Make me a Nexus believer again.
Anyone agree with me?
TL;DR, lol.
Nexus 4 will be made by Samsung. Should've called it the SGS4.
I disagree.
SGS2 owner.
locsplitter said:
Nexus 4 will be made by Samsung. Should've called it the SGS4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uh... OK.
The Nexus 4 is made by LG. Not Samsung.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Thats a lot of writing man, my eyes hurt
johnbyebye said:
TL;DR, lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This.
Some things can't be properly conveyed in a short paragraph.
Not that I expected any actual responses in a Nexus forum.
I'm not saying that I'm not all in on the Nexus 4.. just saying I don't hold high hopes that it will be everything Google claims..
I read it and here's my take on the Nexus 4.
I may not be as technical as most people on XDA, but I try to read up as much as I can. I think what makes MOST (not all) Android users different from MOST (not all) iPhone users is that we actually take the time to research a product before be buy it. They buy their products because it says "Apple" on the box. We have countless different devices to choose from. We HAVE to do the research before we buy. This isn't just about buying a Nexus, this is about buying a new Android phone and having to choose between what's currently on the market.
For me, I'm over my current phone (T-Mobile G2x) and want to get a new one, but I'm still on contract. I don't make enough money to drop $600+ on a new phone. Hell, even if I did make enough money, I wouldn't be comfortable dropping that much money on a phone. Buying a phone from Google means I can buy a nice phone at an affordable price without forcing me to extend a contract that I never wanted to be on in the first place (I originally only switched from Virgin Mobile to T-Mobile because I wanted a better phone at a decent price and signing a contract used to be the only way to do that). My original plan was actually to buy the Galaxy Nexus to hold me over until my upgrade was available and then, from there, decide if I wanted to stick with Android or try out Windows Phone 8.
Then the Nexus 4 was announced and for the same exact price as the Galaxy Nexus. It's a better phone, at a better price.
Like I said, I may not be as technical as the rest of you, but what I see is a phone that is equivalent to each heavy hitter currently on the market (Galaxy SIII, One X, iPhone 5, the various upcoming offerings from Windows Phone 8). The only difference is that this phone is half the price of all of those. That's what I see when I look at the Nexus 4. I see an affordable upgrade for my current phone that is cheaper to every other comparable phone on the market and that's why I'm going to buy it (after consumer reviews of course, but it's almost certain that I will be ordering this phone before the month is over).
Now, the thing I do not understand is why people with the above mentioned phones would seriously consider this. Yes, it's a Nexus. Yes, it will get updates faster. But why should that all matter? All of us here on XDA are probably running rooted phones and we've all probably flashed multiple ROMs. My G2x is currently running Jellybean 4.1. It may not be 4.2, but I'm sure a clever dev will make it happen at some point. If not my phone, all of the above mentioned phones (minus the iPhone and Windows Phone 8 obviously) will get it at some point. Our vanilla Android experience isn't going to be vanilla for too long out of the box.
Maybe it's because I'm not made of money, but I wouldn't be able to justify dropping another $350 if I already had a $600+ phone. I don't buy into brands (part of the reason why I refuse to use Apple products). I'm happy to be a future owner of a Nexus phone, but I'm not buying it because it's Nexus (although that is nice). I'm buying it because it's cheap and, to my untrained eyes, more or less equal to the best phones on the market.
To each their own. To me, Nexus 4. All there is to it
I agree. I am buying the nexus 4 strictly for these reasons:
1) I need a new phone, currently using Samsung captivate on aokp jb milestone 1.
2) don't want to spend an arm and a leg for a new phone
3) want a phone that will be supported with software updates immediately
4) Want a phone that has great specs so that it can support future software updates down the road
I am not expecting this phone to be a savior. As the old saying goes, if it seems too good to be true it usually is. To buy the most powerful "best" phone and only pay 359$ for it brand new? That seems too good to be true IMO. I just need a huge upgrade from my captivate and the nexus is more than that.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda app-developers app
Obagleyfreer said:
The Nexus 4 is made by LG. Not Samsung.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not according to this retailer. http://www.popularelect.com/LG-Nexus-4-Unlocked-Smartphone-p/Nexus4.htm?gclid=CKm_ksGpu7MCFcaDQgodClkAow
Source discussion http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1977196
I can see your point though I don't agree with some of your reasoning. At times there are levels of excitement that are disproportionate to reality, but I don't think this is representative of the majority of users.
As for the "negative reviews" take a look at the screenshots that show kernel and baseband versions - on at least three of the sites they are different versions. It is highly likely that software improvements will address these issues. The fact that many of the reviews did not make note that the software on their review device is a pre-release version is either disingenuous or ignorant. Making note of this as a consumer does not denote fanboyism.
All products will have build quality issues, this is just how things are. I returned my first Galaxy S2 because of problems with the screen and my first Nexus 7 as well. I know people who have had problems with iPhones and other Android devices which required RMA. Does that mean that an LG product will now have flaws because it has Google branding on it? Hardly. There probably will be issues and we'll hear all the whining and moaning, we wait and see.
tl;dr - it's just a phone, people need to chill the **** out. Only time will tell if it's a great phone or not.
comminus said:
I can see your point though I don't agree with some of your reasoning. At times there are levels of excitement that are disproportionate to reality, but I don't think this is representative of the majority of users.
As for the "negative reviews" take a look at the screenshots that show kernel and baseband versions - on at least three of the sites they are different versions. It is highly likely that software improvements will address these issues. The fact that many of the reviews did not make note that the software on their review device is a pre-release version is either disingenuous or ignorant. Making note of this as a consumer does not denote fanboyism.
All products will have build quality issues, this is just how things are. I returned my first Galaxy S2 because of problems with the screen and my first Nexus 7 as well. I know people who have had problems with iPhones and other Android devices which required RMA. Does that mean that an LG product will now have flaws because it has Google branding on it? Hardly. There probably will be issues and we'll hear all the whining and moaning, we wait and see.
tl;dr - it's just a phone, people need to chill the **** out. Only time will tell if it's a great phone or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why, when other phones are reviewed, are they not on some sort of "pre-release" software?
I don't remember reading reviews of other high end Android phones and seeing people say they were "misleading" or that the "software wasn't optimized"
I mean c'mon, all of the sudden reviews are completely bogus and software isn't up to par?
I don't care of they were running GB, the phone either flies or it doesn't.
OP, I'm really glad you made this thread. I've never had a Nexus and I also am over my current device (myTouch 4G) and chomping at the bit to get a new one. I had no idea there were that many problems with either the gnex or the N7. This worries me. I have some thinking to do...
Also, have a thanks.
ingenious247 said:
Why, when other phones are reviewed, are they not on some sort of "pre-release" software?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If the software is not released or finished, then they are by definition running 'pre-release' software.
ingenious247 said:
I don't remember reading reviews of other high end Android phones and seeing people say they were "misleading" or that the "software wasn't optimized"
I mean c'mon, all of the sudden reviews are completely bogus and software isn't up to par?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never said the reviews were completely bogus, in fact I mentioned how it was obvious that there was different software on at least three review devices and that It is highly likely that software improvements will address the issues. Note - I am acknowledging that there are issues
Again, it's just a phone. If you are concerned it wont meet your expectations wait until it's been out for a while to see what happens; some people will love it, others will call it a flop.
Other top phones (SIII, etc.) aren't reviewed with pre-release software because they use an established version of Android, aka SIII shipping with ICS, whereas the Nexus 4 is shipping with a brand new version of Android, 4.2, which has not been as widely tested and established, and which Google is probably still working on. If 4.2 were completely ready today, the Nexus 4 would probably be released today, rather than the 13th.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using xda app-developers app
To me it is a matter of price. I'm stuck with Xperia mini, and I want to upgrade. At the same time the Nexus 4 is released, and it is insanely cheap, at least from foreign countries like Germany (which use the same power plug as Sweden). The price is what makes this phone so very interesting, if it weren't for that there would have been a lot of other phones in question. In Sweden the Nexus 4 isn't something out of the ordinary, when you can buy a Galaxy S3 for about the same price. But if I import this phone from Germany, I save about 150 euros, that is why I'm very interested.
The fact that it is a Nexus is positive, but not the main factor. I've read some bad reviews, but for this price, it isn't a dealbreaker. The same criticism at swedish prices would be a dealbreaker however.
Regards,
rodstrom
I need a new phone, I have always preferred vanilla android, and I've had two nexus phones before my current non-nexus phone.
I am ready to be back on a nexus phone, between the quick updates, and being free from a contract, the nexus 4 is extremely enticing, AND at an amazing pricepoint.
I agree with the OP on many counts. Even though I myself have had no problems with my GNex and felt that it was THE most beautiful phone I have owned (maybe second to the LG Prada), the whites were jaundiced and sickly looking. And even though kernels like Trinity fixed it to a certain extent, Google needs to realize one thing - the phone needs to be working without problems out of the box. I think what is happening is an over dependency on devs and a complacency thinking that people will overlook glitches in nexus devices because, hey! after all this is android. The devs can fix everything, right?!
A trend I am seeing with the N4 is that no matter what the issue is, many people go, 'well its just 350, so its ok'! No its not! Its not like we asked Google to make an inexpensive device, so they were compelled and thus had to resort to faulty and low quality hardware to cut costs. The price was their decision. I as a consumer want my phone problem free - $350 or $650
That said, I hope as much as the next guy that the problems so far are indeed related to pre-release firmwares and kernels. But then, it was absolutely ridiculous and insane of Google to send those devices for review. Might as well have no reviews than have tons of negative ones. Sure, people here on XDA are 'techy' enough to know that the test firmware is not final and most of the issues might be wrinkled out by release date. But a common man sees the review and goes 'oh crap! i don't want a headache, lemme just get something that everyone says works i.e. iPhone'.
-end rant-

Categories

Resources