Related
Im getting tired if I read in a rom thread "is this rom 4.0.4 based?"
NO ITS NOT! (not until the source drops, or we get a ota! )
Just to clear up the confusion
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
your right but people don't read and others get misinfo from others who have no clue..just causes confusion for inexperienced people
i understand your frustration and reason to post this
but wont change anything really
Just wait for version 4.0.5, which will be released next month (March) for the NS.
IIIV said:
Just wait for version 4.0.5, which will be released next month (March) for the NS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your source? Please tell me it isn't the french image posted with no real source?
ok, so no full aosp roms...but what about customized stock roms?? You don't need source for that, do you? Can't we just get some roms built on stock 4.0.4 with some kang features? That's what I really want anyway. IME, stock roms are always more stable, and the customizations are a really nice addition
Ns4g got the 4.0.4 update! So the source is already out isnt it?
Or how is it possible that 4.0.4 based roms are out?
sent while eating an ice cream sandwich in the matr1x
4I-I said:
Ns4g got the 4.0.4 update! So the source is already out isnt it?
Or how is it possible that 4.0.4 based roms are out?
sent while eating an ice cream sandwich in the matr1x
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No the custom roms based on 4.0.4 are based on the leaked 4.0.4 build. NS4G didnt get the 4.0.4 update yet.
correct me if I'm wrong
hp420 said:
ok, so no full aosp roms...but what about customized stock roms?? You don't need source for that, do you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, if you want a good rom. Otherwise, there's no much you can do other than change some of the packages.
I've just seen the news about onskreen going multitasking,,,,,,went to download,,,,,,,,,,,but really I don't know what to download and how to use it on my TF101G
As far as i know:
Cornerstone is no app as you understand it. It is something like a "launcher".
The problem is that cornerstone has to be integrated into the os by the manufacturer himself because it has to be integrated deeply into the os.
So you won't see cornerstone on tablets unless a manufacturer decides to implement it.
Or someone takes the AOSP code from google and releases a complete rom. But i think that would be a lot of work. I don't think that someone would do this. It would be awesome to see this im cyanogenmod^^. I mean both are open source now.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
I think I saw someone with a Xoom that has it.. (from Reddit). It would be awesome if we got it too.. I need to learn to make roms in my spare time.
it has to be baked into the rom its not a apk u run
I would love to try this too !
The "simple" way would be to get source from a rom, to integrate it and build the rom. But the integration step is unfortunatly not simply I think :/
Integrating difficulties is just one of the problems... for example Cornerstone requires ICS.. which we don't have.
asdfuogh said:
Integrating difficulties is just one of the problems... for example Cornerstone requires ICS.. which we don't have.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First ICS has to come out. Then we will gather our forces, go on our knees and humbly ask any dev to face the challenge and coock rom with Onskreen integrated. It will not be soon, but someday ... Hope never dies...
Since it's under the ASL, I hope that it's included into the official CM9 for the Transformer. If it is not, I'm sure that there will be unofficial CM9 roms with it. Now, Asus, release the ICS update for the Transformer we need the kernel sources and drivers...
Vyrlokar said:
Since it's under the ASL, I hope that it's included into the official CM9 for the Transformer. If it is not, I'm sure that there will be unofficial CM9 roms with it. Now, Asus, release the ICS update for the Transformer we need the kernel sources and drivers...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Steve Kondid stated he will work to get it into CM9 (that's if it come to the TF).
He has it running on his 10.1
"fat__tire: Just for fun... http://t.co/gLBPGYMW Sorta buggy but sorta cool. #nookcolor #cm9 #cornerstone"
--http://twitter.com/fat__tire/status/169628187347783681
well we got ICS. Anyone working on getting cornerstone working?
cmarticus said:
well we got ICS. Anyone working on getting cornerstone working?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First we need a stable custom rom then we need a normal version and a cornerstone version patience is a virtue
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
^^ what he said but the expand on that we need a rom that is fully deodexed or one that has a full source code available so that it can be baked in without signature errors + we need a apk dev and a rom dev (Or one that can do both) to put it all together
HTC opened source code of kernel 3.0.16 for One V. It's the same hardware based as our DHD. So I hope now devs can use it to make our custom roms to be fully functional with ICS 4.0.
Who is the first?
http://htcdev.com/devcenter/downloads
FireBlast said:
HTC opened source code of kernel 3.0.16 for One V. It's the same hardware based as our DHD. So I hope now devs can use it to make our custom roms to be fully functional with ICS 4.0.
Who is the first?
http://htcdev.com/devcenter/downloads
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good news
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA
cool wonder how long before we get a full working ics rom a day or two at most.....
It's not that simple.
While they share the same SoC, they do not have the same board, hence board config files.
The jump from linux 2.6.x to 3.0.x is huge and u can't simply bring in those missing board-spade*.c .h files from the old kernel and expect them to compile. You're going to get a whole lot of compile errors because the underlying linux kernel has gone through so much changes. It's a daunting and massive undertaking.
My money is on devs waiting for HTC to release DHD kernel source for ICS.
Hi,
i am working on a port of android 4.1 (jelly bean) for the play.
like we did with android 4.0
this is going to be easier to port as we can use most files from android 4.0
Nick
progress:
Just got sdk image, 4.1 is rally great on my computer!!!
you sir...are the best!
Sounds awesome as hell. But thought you needed moar moeny to keep developing? Or did you get it after-all?
Will this run better than ICS? and I'm assuming touchpads work? (whatever worked on ICS that is)
Here is a video in this thread showing improvements from ICS 4.0. It shows an increase in FPS and smoothness. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1736726
Sent from my R800i using xda premium
Here is the system dump for everyone who wants to port it
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=27963070
hi,
i still need some money but i have almost enough.
got the system.img unpacked replaced some libs some /bin files and lot of /etc files
hanging on kernel logo (hanging, not rebooting) with logcat: netd1.0 starting
nickholtus said:
hi,
i still need some money but i have almost enough.
got the system.img unpacked replaced some libs some /bin files and lot of /etc files
hanging on kernel logo (hanging, not rebooting) with logcat: netd1.0 starting
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was getting the same error when porting.
Is there any specific kernel changes in 4.1?
Sent from R800x
I just looked around the forum, therw are already sdk ports for the one x and an ota update for the gnex. Pretty quick.
Gesendet von meinem Xperia Play mit Tapatalk 2
i was starting to port 4.1 too, and im really sure its a kernel problem.
Kernel isn't a problem.
Can be some libs or some missing files
idea
make the google now launching by using the search button on xperia play.
google search with simple typing on the search button and the google now with hold typing on the search button
you should ask to some help from doomlord
hi,
doomlord can't help as he is an kernel developer and i am kernel/rom developer
he doesn't know very much about developing for roms
It shouldn't be too long before CyanogenMod at least takes a stab at doing JB, so in addition to what nickholtus has already said he's working on, JB shouldn't take too long to make it to us. Given Google's numbering scheme, I would imagine that 4.1 isn't such a monumental change from 4.0 to merit a complete reworking.
lightningdude said:
It shouldn't be too long before CyanogenMod at least takes a stab at doing JB, so in addition to what nickholtus has already said he's working on, JB shouldn't take too long to make it to us. Given Google's numbering scheme, I would imagine that 4.1 isn't such a monumental change from 4.0 to merit a complete reworking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope OP's successful as I'd flipping love to get a JB ROM on my phone with its supposed speed increase.
Although, I'm still waiting on this magic Linaro stuff which doesn't look like it'll deliver
We will be able to get JB working as well (if not better) than ICS once official source code is released mid July
i am porting the galaxy nexus version now.
as it is better then the sdk (leaked ota build)
nickholtus said:
i am porting the galaxy nexus version now.
as it is better then the sdk (leaked ota build)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome
Hey guys.
I am new to android developing.
I started by porting the CM10.1 ROM from HTC Desire, but my phone is stuck at the Huawei logo when it boots up.
I can still flash another ROM, but that is not the problem.
I want to know how to fix this. I want it to go past the Huawei Logo.
By the way, I used this procedure: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713 and I used Aurora ICS 5.0 for the base ROM. I know it doesn't have the same version of android, but there is no reason I shouldn't be experimenting like this.
Can anyone help?
Thanks.
rqmok said:
Hey guys.
I am new to android developing.
I started by porting the CM10.1 ROM from HTC Desire, but my phone is stuck at the Huawei logo when it boots up.
I can still flash another ROM, but that is not the problem.
I want to know how to fix this. I want it to go past the Huawei Logo.
By the way, I used this procedure: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713 and I used Aurora ICS 5.0 for the base ROM. I know it doesn't have the same version of android, but there is no reason I shouldn't be experimenting like this.
Can anyone help?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Delete phone.apk and try it?
Sent from my U8800-51
You can't port CM10.1 ROM to ICS ROM as base. That is inpossible.
I know
Mlopik said:
You can't port CM10.1 ROM to ICS ROM as base. That is inpossible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, but it is not completely impossible.
I also tried to port it with CM10.1 that you are trying to fix, but I still get the same thing.
I will setup logcat and upload the information here.
Thanks.
Need to ask something
Hey again.
I haven't had time to do anything to my phone yet.
I am replying to ask if there is an awesome tutorial out there that could help me with this porting?
Currently, to port my ROM, I replaced files in port ROM from base ROM. Should I replace files in base ROM from port ROM?
Thanks for the help.
Hi Again
Hello.
I found out that there was a problem with the base ROM.
I have ported CM10.1 from U8800! Yaay!
But there are four things that are not working:
- WiFi
- Bluetooth
- Cam Recording
- Sound
Can you guys tell me how to fix the audio? In the logcat, it says that there is no sound output.
Thanks
CatLog results
Hey guys.
I've got the log attached to this reply. Have a look at the audio events and see what is wrong. I can't figure it out by myself.
Thanks
When will you releasing it fully functional?
Working on JB
Djuganight said:
When will you releasing it fully functional?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have just ported the Jelly Bean from u8800pro to u8800non-pro, so I will be working on this ROM.
Seriously, I have no idea when I will be releasing a fully functional ROM. Because I have my studies as well, so I don't get much time to work on the ROM.
The audio is working in this ROM (wasn't working in the previous port),
The things that are currently not working are:
- WiFi
- Bluetooth
- Video Recording
I will try my best to do as much as possible.
I am new at building android ROMs, so please don't expect too much from me
I will be needing some help from other developers as well.
Do you think I should make a thread for this? or is there already enough not-fully functional JB ROMs there?
Thanks.:good:
Lololololol ridiculous!
Another porting, same issues...
How many are now? 4, 5 Jelly beans?
Ooo man, some times is just better to stay quiet....
Djuganight said:
Lololololol ridiculous!
Another porting, same issues...
How many are now? 4, 5 Jelly beans?
Ooo man, some times is just better to stay quiet....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know how you feel. I also feel that way.
I would like to build Jelly Bean from source, like Blefish is doing right now, but I need a 64bit computer for that (mine is only 32bit. Unless there is a hack for this, I can't build from source.
I think everyone is going to start porting Jelly Bean ROMs until one starts working. :silly:
Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...
Djuganight said:
Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U8800 is compatible with JB.
Djuganight said:
Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Our device will remain compatible with every new android untill android will be using some new architecture of processor, so "sometimes it's better to stay silent".
OP, abandon your trials of getting a working JB using copy-paste ports. It can be only ported from source.
P.S.: just install ubuntu x64 and try to build something like CWM recovery out of forumber's source. If it builds, you can build anything you want. Today's computers know how to emulate x64. I'm myself using an old pentium d 820 (i386, sse2 and that's all) and I can build.
Mlopik said:
U8800 is compatible with JB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?
Djuganight said:
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's still same ROM with other features.. It isn't simply fix Wi-Fi without source.
Djuganight said:
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because most of devs or those who like to be called developers don't have required knowledge and then leave the project as an excuse.
Honestly I have no hope that we can see a JB rom fully functional.
dark_vader said:
Because most of devs or those who like to be called developers don't have required knowledge and then leave the project as an excuse.
Honestly I have no hope that we can see a JB rom fully functional.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why you don't make some for android yourself? if it's so simply.
nagato.fm said:
Our device will remain compatible with every new android untill android will be using some new architecture of processor, so "sometimes it's better to stay silent".
OP, abandon your trials of getting a working JB using copy-paste ports. It can be only ported from source.
P.S.: just install ubuntu x64 and try to build something like CWM recovery out of forumber's source. If it builds, you can build anything you want. Today's computers know how to emulate x64. I'm myself using an old pentium d 820 (i386, sse2 and that's all) and I can build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I can install ubuntu x64 on my x86 laptop? Are you talking about a virtual machine or installing ubuntu x64 on the actual laptop?
And as for others: Instead of saying that JB is not compatible with our device and all that sh*t, why don't you encourage me and give me some solutions.
Anyways, I am not posting this JB ROM until it's fully functional, because I might stop development as well (getting interested in firefox os).
rqmok said:
So I can install ubuntu x64 on my x86 laptop? Are you talking about a virtual machine or installing ubuntu x64 on the actual laptop?
And as for others: Instead of saying that JB is not compatible with our device and all that sh*t, why don't you encourage me and give me some solutions.
Anyways, I am not posting this JB ROM until it's fully functional, because I might stop development as well (getting interested in firefox os).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all,your CPU must support x64,If it supported,you can install x64 to you computer.
If you want install x64 system in virtual machine (like VirtualBox),you CPU must support VT-x or AMD-V (virtualization).
You can check virtualization and x64 support via SecurAble;
http://securable.en.softonic.com