120% performance increase with Linaro toolchain - Nexus S General

I heard the Linaro changes are being pushed, I checked and it looks like it may take a little more time.
basically the Linaro builds use a toolchain that give android builds up to a 30%* performance increase
If any devs want to take a look at it, It's in gerrit (I think this is it)
http://review.cyanogenmod.com/#/c/17380/
EDIT: Galaxy Nexus version's reported benchmarks

I read it was only a 30# improvement. I hope it improves the lag on the recents list.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

mikeymop said:
I read it was only a 30# improvement. I hope it improves the lag on the recents list.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I calculated based on panda-board FPS average results, but you're probably right
EDIT: yep, it was 30, I'm bad at math

Ezekeel believed this was not true, check this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1371044

bedalus said:
Ezekeel believed this was not true, check this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1371044
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A Galaxy Nexus ROM has this and they say the UI overall is faster.
http://www.reddit.com/r/Android/com...ld_optimizations_that_can_make_ics_30/c4y97ef
Could be placebo, who knows.

Could be... Someone needs to benchmark it properly!

bedalus said:
Could be... Someone needs to benchmark it properly!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If this is real, I have a feeling it doesn't respond to benchmarks. As most know, benchmarks are not real world tests.
e.g. deleting an OpenGLes lib to make benchmarks show a different score.

bedalus said:
Could be... Someone needs to benchmark it properly!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already see one person that won't hesitate to benchmark this as soon as it will be available on Nexus S

Wow if this implemented on our phones we will not be needing another core
Sent from my Nexus S®

Oh wait, found this:
http://www.cnx-software.com/2012/06...k-android-to-shame-on-ti-pandaboard-omap4430/
...with the same video.
Looks promising!

Slim ics rom and kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Omg my score is higher than linaro optimized android on gnex!i wonder how much improvement we'll get if slim rom also optimized by linaro..
Sent from my Crespo using xda premium

What program is that your using ? Would love this to come to cm9 based nexus s roms
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2

tchaari said:
I already see one person that won't hesitate to benchmark this as soon as it will be available on Nexus S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your right! Bedalus will have this sorted soon enough! I'm sure it will be added to the sticky soon after
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium

according to Gerrit, CM is having some troubles with compatibility, and they are sorting that out right now.

italia0101 said:
What program is that your using ? Would love this to come to cm9 based nexus s roms
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
koax88 is using 0xbench

koax88 said:
Slim ics rom and kernel
View attachment 1119576
Omg my score is higher than linaro optimized android on gnex!i wonder how much improvement we'll get if slim rom also optimized by linaro..
Sent from my Crespo using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to compare it to a GNEX, not using Nexus S. GNEX has to push more pixels and so on to the 4.65" 720p screen comparing to Nexus S with 4.0" display. I believe that would put a strain on the CPU?

I have question. In which part of an android will this be implemented? The rom or the kernel?
Sent from my Nexus S®

The rom, good sir

mixtapes08 said:
I have question. In which part of an android will this be implemented? The rom or the kernel?
Sent from my Nexus S®
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good question. We've already seen that there's no significant benefit from linaro 'optimized' kernel builds. Should be interesting.
....memoirs of a flash addict.

CM9 nightly implemented some Linaro code in the build you can see in change log I did 2 quadrant scores at 1.4ghz & got total score of 1800 I then flashed the Anidroid hardened kernel b.13 which was build using linaro tool chain & got a score of 2500 phone did seem a little quicker but nothing crazy
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium

Related

I/O Speed increse like Desire

Hello
I was wondering if any devs would be able to get this working on our hero's It massively increases the I/o speed aswell as efficiency meaning a greater battery life I'm going to have a go my self later aswell.
Here are some screenies of what it does;
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=9541647&postcount=477
and the page;
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=859419
And progress on the CDMA side
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=868982
Thanks
I posted a similar thread over on the cdma hero side, I'll keep an eye out over here and let you know if we make any progress
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
jeremysterling said:
I posted a similar thread over on the cdma hero side, I'll keep an eye out over here and let you know if we make any progress
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh okay thanks I'll link that too
MacaronyMax said:
Oh okay thanks I'll link that too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting development over on our side, go check it out. I'm at work otherwise I'd go into more detail
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
Damn if we get that to work on the Hero(es) that would be TOO awesome!! Then we can show newer phone you can teach an old dog new tricks.
I agree the benchmark score looks amazing but will this hack actually improve usability or performance? or is it just a hack that boosts the benchmark score?
Interesting... Not entirely sure how it works but and speed increase on the GSM is more than welcome
Feeyo has made a port into some test releases. You can get it here:
http://www.cronosproject.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=63&t=583
The screenshot looks nice (Hero - Cf 1.7.2):
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Feeyo will make a new release later today.
The speed shown there is around the 700Mhz mark... nice.. but how is this different than flashing a 748Mhz kernel and using SetCPU to overclock your hero? or is it more to do with the internal working of data transfer?
Calico5 said:
The speed shown there is around the 700Mhz mark... nice.. but how is this different than flashing a 748Mhz kernel and using SetCPU to overclock your hero? or is it more to do with the internal working of data transfer?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does more with the internal stuff. I can oc my phone to 768 and only get quad scores in the upper 400's
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
jeremysterling said:
It does more with the internal stuff. I can oc my phone to 768 and only get quad scores in the upper 400's
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh ok, cool thanks! I wonder why cyanogen said they wont be supporting it though
Calico5 said:
Ahh ok, cool thanks! I wonder why cyanogen said they wont be supporting it though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think he's toyed with it and couldn't get it stable and moved on to bigger things
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
jeremysterling said:
I think he's toyed with it and couldn't get it stable and moved on to bigger things
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What could be bigger than a huge performance increase??
Freeyo says hes got a stable release of it HERE (Click Me) running oh his Hero.
here is his performance test, first two OC'd to 710Mhz, the 3rd is using data>EXT
Calico5 said:
What could be bigger than a huge performance increase??
Freeyo says hes got a stable release of it HERE (Click Me) running oh his Hero.
here is his performance test, first two OC'd to 710Mhz, the 3rd is using data>EXT
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Idk, it's just not on cyanogen's priority list for some reason hopefully this can be applied without using a separate rom, I'm on a cdma hero
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
Feeyo's ROM is a hit or miss unfortunately, it either works or it doesn't. And quite sadly it doesn't work for me
::EDIT::
He got it stable
MentalDeath said:
Feeyo's ROM is a hit or miss unfortunately, it either works or it doesn't. And quite sadly it doesn't work for me
::EDIT::
He got it stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lucky! too bad i'm on a cdma hero
hey guys, quick update. we've got a couple cdma devs working on this. i think they're working on porting the script rather than cooking it into a rom so anyone can run it
jeremysterling said:
hey guys, quick update. we've got a couple cdma devs working on this. i think they're working on porting the script rather than cooking it into a rom so anyone can run it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats excellent news
Awesome
Sent from my HTC Hero using XDA App
here's a link to our dev thread over on cdma:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=872216

Quadrant score on vibrant with 2.3

just wanted to share my results with i9000 2.3 ROM on My Vibrant
here is what i got ....Note the CPU score !!
also note high I/O because i have voodoo lagfix
so should avr same as NS around 1700 stock
Nice CPU score
3D is low because quadrant has issues rendering 3D correctly with 2.3
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This is very happy news. What is linpack saying?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Sorry I meant to post in general...please move
Gomjabar said:
This is very happy news. What is linpack saying?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same as NS 14-15
Is the i9000 2.3 made from the nexus s or is it from an official release for i9000?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
jmatic said:
Is the i9000 2.3 made from the nexus s or is it from an official release for i9000?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
made from aosp 2.3 source code & possibly bits from nexus s dump
But how does the Scorpion score on 2.3?
This is excellent news, means the Dalvik Jit compiler is finally optimized to give the Hummingbird a performance boost.
But, what if this excitment is pre-mature? I want to see the nexus ONE(scorpion phone) running 2.3, what if 2.3 on a scorpion boosts their performance even more than it already did on 2.2!
Lets compare 2.3 vibrant to 2.3 scorpion, then we will know!
SamsungVibrant said:
This is excellent news, means the Dalvik Jit compiler is finally optimized to give the Hummingbird a performance boost.
But, what if this excitment is pre-mature? I want to see the nexus ONE(scorpion phone) running 2.3, what if 2.3 on a scorpion boosts their performance even more than it already did on 2.2!
Lets compare 2.3 vibrant to 2.3 scorpion, then we will know!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Scorpion is not on the nexus one
Also Quadrant doesn't test MFLOPS... linpack does
The purpose of my post to show the galaxy S phones take advantage of JIT just like the NS..even though we pretty much knew this
The scorpion CPU is nothing more than a snapdragon with updated adreno GPU will pretty much have same linpack score as N1 snapdragon
this is great, but now i want the official gingerbread, when will samsung end the misery of consumers?!?!?
Awesome, thanks for the pic.
LOL @ no signal, are you sure your not on a iphone?
xriderx66 said:
LOL @ no signal, are you sure your not on a iphone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It needs a sim card to get a signal
demo23019 said:
It needs a sim card to get a signal
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh.. ha jokes on me.
Upload CWM or ODIN version of this rom so we can do this too ?
I am assuming that this rom has taken supercurio's development further along
demo23019 said:
Scorpion is not on the nexus one
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct, I meant snapdragon.
ozmulti said:
Upload CWM or ODIN version of this rom so we can do this too ?
I am assuming that this rom has taken supercurio's development further along
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, this is supercurio's rom. He's simply showing the performance results of it. There is no fully functional Gingerbread rom for SGS phones yet. However, if supercurio continues at this pace, it may not be much longer
Thanks a lot for sharing this... although, you've just made the wait that much harder.
Wow if its true.I had similar cpu reading in quadrant while testing cm6 beta3 also.i even posted it here in excitement but later came to know that it excluded h264 test to get the inflated results...hope its not the same with gb port.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
Ok noob question......how do I figure out my score....
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Is It the Demo or something?

Best ROM Based On The ICS Beta?

Like the title says, what is the best ROM based on the ICS Beta from Sony + What kernel are you using & whats it clocked at?
Sent from my R800i using xda premium
AwaisKhan said:
Like the title says, what is the best ROM based on the ICS Beta from Sony + What kernel are you using & whats it clocked at?
Sent from my R800i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Biased Question,
There is No best or worst ROM They side On preference Try them Yourself Doing this will Point rage at you.!..
Xperia4life said:
Biased Question,
There is No best or worst ROM They side On preference Try them Yourself Doing this will Point rage at you.!..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was asking it to people who have experienced the different ROMS, which one 'they' find best, i only want peoples opinions.
Sent from my R800i using xda premium
The best for me was the darkforest
Ice rom and kernel I'm clocked at 1.2ghz and is using smartassv2 almost no bugs but camera sometimes force closes and getting data to work is a pain.
Sent from my R800i using Tapatalk
I'm using Darkforest as my daily driver
Out of all the other ICS ROMs, this one is the top of the cake for me.
Sent from R800x
Best rom?
FXP115- CM9.0 FreeXperia Project is a rom im looking at right now. i looked under the development forum post for it but I need more posts apparently in order to ask questions. So does anyone know what the Rom is, is it stable, and what is not working with this rom? Plz and thanks
Tried both Darkforest and JJ's rom
Both had bugs glitches (part of the screen was cut off)
also battery life was shorter than gingerbread
switched back to gingerbread until / if ics as good
Darkforest seems good, ill try it later;D
Sent from my R800i using xda premium
Could you post screenshots?
Sent from my R800i using xda premium
AwaisKhan said:
Could you post screenshots?
Sent from my R800i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
KeiranFTW said:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Enjoy
I've noticed a small battery decrease as well from switching from GB. I had to underclock Darkforest to get the same amount.
Still great tho. Just a little slow.
I've only tried regular beta and Darkforest, but I did try 3 different kernels. I found the Darkforest kernel had better battery life than the ICS doomkernel, but worse than advanced stock (when they haven't been tweaked)
The difference in battery life for me between ICS and gingerbread is immense. And as you can see in the Darkforest thread, I had severe graphic errors, lockups.. I thought maybe my hardware was screwed but;
Went to jokawild with doomkernel 11 and all the glitches went away. And my battery life is 2x longer at LEAST. Hour and a half of use took me down to 60%. On ICS the same amount of time killed the battery completely. And I haven't even finished tweaking this gingerbread yet..
Also, ICS was laggy. Constant slight lag, occasional large spikes. Gingerbread when configured right is really fast. If you mostly want ICS for the way it looks and not features, get an ICS theme and stick with gingerbread. The new features, especially changes to system menus and browser, and gapps were great, but simply not worth it IMO.
As time goes on and things speed up, I'm sure it'll become more worthwhile, but not right now
Sent from Asgard
Definitely Sony's ROM and kernel.
Sent from my R800i using XDA
I'm having a hard time switching back to Gingerbread
There is another ROM than Darkforest??

Which is the best kernel for u? and why?

so there is 3 man kernels for our nexus s in JB:
-Trinity (der kernel)
-Marmite
-Matr1x
which is the best for u?
im looking to see wich is the fastest but at the same time stable and battery friendly.
You forgot the Air Kernel.
I know but i never liked it...
Sent from my TH3M3D NEXUS S
marmite is my favorite. I love the mtp, it's got the patch to force a/c charging, it's got under/overclock support, and it's a nice quick boot on 4.1.2.
Sorry, mathkid....for some reason matrix on 4.1.x ns4g isn't working to over/underclock, so I can't use it
hp420 said:
marmite is my favorite. I love the mtp, it's got the patch to force a/c charging, it's got under/overclock support, and it's a nice quick boot on 4.1.2.
Sorry, mathkid....for some reason matrix on 4.1.x ns4g isn't working to over/underclock, so I can't use it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what rom are u running?
Cascabreu said:
so there is 3 man kernels for our nexus s in JB:
-Trinity (der kernel)
-Marmite
-Matr1x
wich is the best for u?
im looking to see wich is the fastest but at the same time stable and battery friendly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't there like 3 other threads discussing the same thing right now?
Marmite for me. It works, it doesn't have all those fancy features that require buying an app just to use it. Marmite just flat gets it done.
_thalamus' kernel; perhaps it has higher battery drain than marmite or others, but no one is as fast and smooth as that one. I prefer performance and stability rather than best battery life; after all, I always charge the phone at the end of the day to have it full for next day, so....
Enviado desde mi Nexus S usando Tapatalk 2
My phone always liked trinity. From gb / ics / jb. Matrix would be a close second for me. Marmite was awesome for me around 4.5 build but since then I get a fast dying phone for some reason.
Honestly once the trinity teuv gets voodoo sound it'll be perfect for me. I haven't had a reboot running it in over a month on rasbean jelly
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda app-developers app
Marmite FTW!
Sent from SpeedMachine i9023
alen1901 said:
Marmite FTW!
Sent from SpeedMachine i9023
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
When i was using ICS, it was always with AIR.
Now that i run JB, i began with AIR, and i'm now running Marmite.
I don't really care about battery, but i fond marmite as more stable imo.
zhok said:
_thalamus' kernel; perhaps it has higher battery drain than marmite or others, but no one is as fast and smooth as that one. I prefer performance and stability rather than best battery life; after all, I always charge the phone at the end of the day to have it full for next day, so....
Enviado desde mi Nexus S usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 :thumbup:
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
+1 for marmite
some screenshots:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Haven't seen a whole lot of Matr1x users here! V. 23.5 has been great. Check out my screen shots! He hasn't been very active updating it but I'm sure he will if there is more active users on his thread.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA Premium HD app
Thalamus kernel. Sad to see he's stopped developing for the Nexus S
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
ohitspat said:
Thalamus kernel. Sad to see he's stopped developing for the Nexus S
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I fear matrix is next up for the development stopping . I know many of us have used and supported matrix since the gingerbread days . It has always been a great kernel and remains a staple for my phone. I believe development for this kernel would continue and surpass all our expectations with continued support from us the community. Sure would hate to lose the matrix kernel also. Just my 2 cents .
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
You don't need so called constant development of a kernel. All that is for the most part is feature wanking and buzzword dropping.
People are hooked on this weekly update bs from cherry picking people. That just update their crap just for the sake of updating.
When you release a good stable working kernel you don't need or get a thread full of posts and discussion about crashes or what pointless buzzword will be added next.
I prefer matrix for touchwake. I found that in large part, there wasn't much difference for me between marmite and matrix in performance, stability, and battery life. Both were phenomenal. with regard to the "lack of active users" comment, I think the lack of thread activity is due to the kernel being bug free. maths threads have always been quiet for this very reason.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda app-developers app
What is touchwakr? Never get ot right..
Sent from my TH3M3D NEXUS S
Cascabreu said:
what rom are u running?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PA 2.18 for ns4g

Benchmark out of the box

Out of the box benchmark very impressed!
gif upload
MRobbo80 said:
Out of the box benchmark very impressed!
gif upload
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get pretty much the same score with optimize in the power settings!
kossiewossie said:
I get pretty much the same score with optimize in the power settings!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got a slightly higher score out of the box not by much but still an awesome tablet!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-hBmPylPQw
Just posted to compare. Taken from Mi Pad.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My its higher than yours
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet using XDA Free mobile app
rene130313 said:
My its higher than yours
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
when I played around I am hitting more the 43.5k
44k with dalvik, 42k with art.
Not sure whether nvidia messed up art or did a good job of optimising dalvik, but it's the first time I've seen it score higher.
Sent from my Xperia Z using Tapatalk
Just remembered when using xposed framework art does not work will have to uninstall and see the difference
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet
Stock Rom, Rooted
How have you got that high?
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet using Tapatalk
fards said:
How have you got that high?
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The new Antutu v5 has higher scores for gpu.. so its about 10k points higher then antutu v4 benchmarks.
SoLdieR9312 said:
Stock Rom, Rooted
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow
Anyone mind testing this app
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2563427
Just want to know how bad it leaves the other devices posted
Unjustified Dev said:
Anyone mind testing this app
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2563427
Just want to know how bad it leaves the other devices posted
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Performance Results
Score:
12,765 points
Screen resolution normalized score:
27,059 points
lowest: 15.10 fps
highest: 183,32 fps
avg: 59,68 fps
btw, this app does not turn the navbar off, so it shows the navigation keys in the benchmark.
SoLdieR9312 said:
Performance Results
Score:
12,765 points
Screen resolution normalized score:
27,059 points
lowest: 15.10 fps
highest: 183,32 fps
avg: 59,68 fps
btw, this app does not turn the navbar off, so it shows the navigation keys in the benchmark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool , out of curiosity of previous benchmarks I decided to compile the kernel in linaro 4.8 with cortex a15 optimizations wondering if the antutu benchmark will noticed a difference you must have cwm to install I added stock kernel just in case this one has issues.
Unjustified Dev said:
Cool , out of curiosity of previous benchmarks I decided to compile the kernel in linaro 4.8 with cortex a15 optimizations wondering if the antutu benchmark will noticed a difference you must have cwm to install I added stock kernel just in case this one has issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not unlocked and i dont have cwm installed, only rooted via towel-root.
I want to keep the tablet stock.
Unjustified Dev said:
Cool , out of curiosity of previous benchmarks I decided to compile the kernel in linaro 4.8 with cortex a15 optimizations wondering if the antutu benchmark will noticed a difference you must have cwm to install I added stock kernel just in case this one has issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks will have a look.
MRobbo80 said:
Thanks will have a look.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi have tested kernel and works great! I get an extra 1.5k total of 44.5k, normally around 43k give or take this is not version 5. Please stick around we need some great devs!!
Is that kernel going to need an unlocked bootloader?
Can fastboot boot recovery images but I've but tried a kernel yet.
Tempted to start working on some kernels for this device, will see how my time pans out with new job
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet using Tapatalk
fards said:
Is that kernel going to need an unlocked bootloader?
Sent from my SHIELD Tablet using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, i flashed cwm via flashify, then rebooted into cwm and flashed the kernel.
EDIT: AnTuTu v5 56953 Points now, a little higher.

Categories

Resources