[DEV][WIP] Port Htc Sense 4.0A (booting!)(no fcś) - Xperia Play General

Hi all,
As the topic name says: i and a few other people are working on a htc sense 4.0A port (the light version).
Progress so far: NONE!
What do we need to do:
porting a sense 4.0 rom (from desire hd)
MAYBE a kernel (but AOSP kernel should work)
decrease the zip file.
will update this later..

progress: It is fully booting now, with massive fc's

also reserved..

last one.

Reserved I'd love to test and promote with like videos and such. Pm me if your interested or want me to remove this. Also I am 100% supportive of this.
Sent from my Xperia Play using Tapatalk 2

Haha this is great guys Looking forward to this, will definitely use it.
BTW: I'm happy to test, Unlocked bootloader.

Sounds awsome! looking forward to it. I might post a video of the ROM in here in future. But good luck

Guys dont be to happy yet, be happy when it boots. Otherwise you could be dissapointed. BTW if you need a tester here i am.
Gesendet von meinem R800i mit Tapatalk 2

i don't need testers atm.
testing some thing atm
edit: i am trying to port from hd2, as it also have mtd partitions

nickholtus said:
i don't need testers atm.
testing some thing atm
edit: i am trying to port from hd2, as it also have mtd partitions
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Willing to try absolutely anything on my r800i unlocked bootloader , when you need it.
Sent from my Xperia Play using Tapatalk 2

Woohoo! Sweet finally someone is porting HTC Sense on Xperia Play, been waiting like forever! Thanks nickholtus and your team, hope everything goes well!

Its been a while since there has been news worthy development on the Play
Your idea seems pretty solid, and I don't see why it shouldn't boot. Good luck! If you need any help with a CDMA port, I am willing to help.

I was going to attempt this myself but I was still looking for a worthy/compatible base. Maybe I can be some help to you even though I am just beginning and very new to this. Just let me know I still will try my own very soon as I need to learn.
Sent from my R800i using xda premium

I'm giving this a retry in the morning. Got the Galaxy S2 CM7 update but when it came to unpacking the kernel for the Plays CM7, Cygwin Bash Shell threw me an error message. I gave flashing it a shot but CWM gave me an error with the words "Samsung Galaxy" in them. At least it looks like the system is recognizing the script changes.
I'll try tomorrow with a stock Play firmware. If I make any progress i.e something that boots and works, I'll post it up here and start working on other ROMs

Can't get the boot.img to flash properly...
"fastboot flash boot boot.img" works but "fastboot boot boot.img" says the image is the wrong format

nickholtus said:
MAYBE a kernel (but AOSP kernel should work)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So if AOSP kernel works, does that mean locked Verizon users can use it? Since the Xperia Play Verizon model uses pure Vanilla Android?

Selim873 said:
So if AOSP kernel works, does that mean locked Verizon users can use it? Since the Xperia Play Verizon model uses pure Vanilla Android?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, because sense 4.0 uses android 4.0 and therefore you need an ics kernel
Sent from the best gaming phone in the world.

Bummer... If I could port a Gingerbread Sense rom, or develop anything for that matter, I definitely would. :\ I'll be getting my first debit card soon so if gas doesn't get too much in the way, I get my phone unlocked. Can't wait to see how this goes!!

Selim873 said:
Bummer... If I could port a Gingerbread Sense rom, or develop anything for that matter, I definitely would. :\ I'll be getting my first debit card soon so if gas doesn't get too much in the way, I get my phone unlocked. Can't wait to see how this goes!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's worth unlocking. I have aokplay on my play and it's awesome.
Sent from the best gaming phone in the world.

Selim873 said:
Bummer... If I could port a Gingerbread Sense rom, or develop anything for that matter, I definitely would. :\ I'll be getting my first debit card soon so if gas doesn't get too much in the way, I get my phone unlocked. Can't wait to see how this goes!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Funny thing is, this porting method isn't as hard as it seems.
The only bit giving me issues is editing the scripts.
I'm going to have a scan around and check to see if any more devs want to help. I'm trying to port the Galaxy S2 CM7 rom over and Nickholtus is trying Sense. I'm going to look over the script for some Motorola devices and see if they would be easier

Related

CyanogenMod

I know this is developement section and i should not post like this but i want to tell that whenever i open this developement section i see some new froyo custom roms or rom upgrades with several new features , nothing more. I think it is enough creating roms like v1.0 then v1.1 then v1.2 then v1.3 and so on. Galaxy 5 uses enjoying cyanogen but we can't. All devs are in the race for providing better froyo roms but no on one wants to provide cyanogen, why? because it is not possible. If port of cyanogen is possible in g5 then not in g3. G3 is better phone then G5. Shall we have to satisfied only with froyo roms? All devs are giving their best but it is enough creating new version of froyo in every week, do something new, port CYANOGEN which we really wants.I don't know anything about programming, coding, i can't do anything but all u devs are able to port cyanogen to our device. So please stop doing like v1.0=>v1.1=>v1.2=>v1.3 and do Cyanogen.All devs please combilne at one place and give us CYANOGEN.
Cyanogen can be ported to our phone. I have no idea how can i do this, i may give it a try in summer but i will fail, it is sure. But i will start to learn coding, & kernel compiling (the basics).
Maybe a few of the devs come together, make a team and then work on this
m ready to learn and try
you are right but seriously its not EASY! you should have very good programming skills... and why is CM so good anyway? i would prefer MIUI port. when you say cyanogen mod i assume you mean the latest GB version? what is so great in GB anyway? i mean yeah its newer than froyo but still, i have my own tablet and it runs 2.3 (3.0 is coming ) and i dont think its that great... i like the edge glow and on/off animation but thats it. we CAN have the same features on froyo! and besides IF we would port GB it would take so much time that android 2.5 would be out already and then everybody would say that GB sucks... thats all
It's a lot lot of work to do it.
marcellusbe said:
It's a lot lot of work to do it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey, like u modify kernel with coding, cant we modify the ROM from the source files??not for cyanogen but to improve froyo better??
dharammaniar said:
Hey, like u modify kernel with coding, cant we modify the ROM from the source files??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In fact, you must start from source files as you must compile all. No ?
In example, for gingerbread, I started compiling it from google source, but I'm stuck with libaudio library.
I took libaudio source code from sgs and I will see if I can compile them and continue.
In addition, you should adapt kernel 2.6.35 for the apollo device, and that's a big work too.
Or if we are lucky, kernel 2.6.32 could work ... I don't know.
I know it is not easy but please devs do something. If porting once started we will defenetily get Cyanogen.
The thing is cyanogen takes alot of time and there's no encouragement so I say whoever devs GB then I will donate £10 to them and I know many others will.
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA App
The best thing wat I feel is stopping any further froyo roms n start porting cm/miui/gb same as v0.1 > v0.2 releasing small mods I think everyone here will help testing them....i dont mind even my phone explodes...i have no idea how u techie guys do all this things all I know is flash watever u guys release n test it so we can make a better g3...
dilzo said:
The thing is cyanogen takes alot of time and there's no encouragement so I say whoever devs GB then I will donate £10 to them and I know many others will.
Sent from my GT-I5800 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think if you want it in a raisonable delay, then it's more than a full time job for only 1 person ....
deadwood01 said:
The best thing wat I feel is stopping any further froyo roms n start porting cm/miui/gb same as v0.1 > v0.2 releasing small mods I think everyone here will help testing them....i dont mind even my phone explodes...i have no idea how u techie guys do all this things all I know is flash watever u guys release n test it so we can make a better g3...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Before you must have a basic framework working and only that it's really a big work to do.
can't u guys make the screen on/off animation on froyo, that would be really cool
werker123 said:
can't u guys make the screen on/off animation on froyo, that would be really cool
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well do that as soon as the guy who already did that will release his mod
We shall ask motafoca for help, he does not have a sg3 but has a lot of knowledge and experience porting Gingerbread to sg5!
Once we have some clue or knowledge on how to start with we then can try/experiment ways to accomplish CyanogenMod.
Some proof for Sg5 having 2.3>here
As for people who want to port GB or Cyanogen flores said in this post http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=13132913&postcount=51 that he has already done work on gingerbread so i guess devs like apollo or other people who have experience in the kernel front can have something to work upon....... what i mean is there are a few devs who have mentioned about their incomplete works on Cyanogen/gingerbread, if an experienced developer can combine all their individual work we can have something actually working........
anant.0097 said:
As for people who want to port GB or Cyanogen flores said in this post http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=13132913&postcount=51 that he has already done work on gingerbread so i guess devs like apollo or other people who have experience in the kernel front can have something to work upon....... what i mean is there are a few devs who have mentioned about their incomplete works on Cyanogen/gingerbread, if an experienced developer can combine all their individual work we can have something actually working........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok first of all dont take flores too seriously... he just talks too much and never does anything so i doupt that he has done anything more than looked at GB and said he can port it... i have asked about his project and quess what? nothing.
True is that we have too many custom roms, but changes only name and theme. We can customize everything in froyo rom, but we need to have some1 who can customize kernel! We have one kernel by our hero marcel and thats all! His kernel is used by every rom here. Always same:
New custom rom!
Same features as another rom
Thanks to marcellube for his kernel
We dont need gb, we dont need cm7
But
We need MORE KERNELS!!!
Sent from my GT-I5800 using Tapatalk
question for all! how can you ask for cyanogen if you wont help anyone? i have asked for people who know java (i know there are people who knows java) but nobody hasnt commented on my thread we could do it but nobody wants to help... all we need is some guys who knows java programming... so is there ANYONE? if there is contact me on this thread or my other thread in general section....
peldax said:
True is that we have too many custom roms, but changes only name and theme. We can customize everything in froyo rom, but we need to have some1 who can customize kernel! We have one kernel by our hero marcel and thats all! His kernel is used by every rom here. Always same:
New custom rom!
Same features as another rom
Thanks to marcellube for his kernel
We dont need gb, we dont need cm7
But
We need MORE KERNELS!!!
Sent from my GT-I5800 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i totally agree! more kernels with different features like on sgs forums... we have already lost one great kernel developer gsam101 who developed the first custom and best kernels for us

Samsung Galaxy S II IceCreamSandwich (ICS) SDK port

dell 0000000000000
dell 00000000000
reserve 2 ---
Shweet!!!!! If I knew how to code..I would surely help you!(If you have anything easy to work on..do tell )
I will die for it IceCream!!! the camera speed is so fast..
Using Gingerbread as a base presumably?
Given the amount of "non-standard" hardware in the SGS2, you'll need support libs from either an existing non-AOSP OEM firmware, or from CM7 won't you?
great.. i hope u will port in a bunch of days
it's so great.you can do it!
tongqihua said:
it's so great.you can do it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol no he can't. There isn't a FULL system dump of the Galaxy Nexus yet. There is only the dump from the SDK. He will probably theme it like Ice Cream Sandwich. Anyways good luck to the dev
source is the power, says cyanogen. wont this be useless when the sources are released? wont this feel like wasting cuz when sources is released, other devs will easily make those ICS roms, instead of porting it.
well anyway good luck to the dev!
LuffyPSP said:
source is the power, says cyanogen. wont this be useless when the sources are released? wont this feel like wasting cuz when sources is released, other devs will easily make those ICS roms, instead of porting it.
well anyway good luck to the dev!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not the point. Of course, a dump would be a lot better. But being the first to port and get a working SDK rom... Now that's where the fun is
It is possible, we have the full SDK ROM.
Ask galnet how you import proprietary files with dependencies
Sent from my GT-I9100
I am working on it!
I am very newbie but we can do something
May the force be with you.. And make it fast cause i am getting itchy already hahaha... Goodluck.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
Face lockscreen already in SGS2 but not enabled
I can help you!!
hobbit19 said:
hello Friends
I started work porting IceCreamSandwich SDK port on the Samsung Galaxy S II
Details very soon!!
if there are developers willing to help me write a personal message
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
great!!!
10chars
I for one don't see this working as every device seems to be getting the same LibC error at the moment (except for some reason the G2).
The best hope seems to be getting a HC rom to work then using the boot.img from that to boot the ICS sdk port. (this is what we believe happened with the G2 to get it to boot)
I would be satisfied with the new gmail application including widget
Cheers!
Looking to try .Hope you have a great ICS.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

[Project] Porting MIUI

Since the xperia x10 mini, galaxy mini and various other ARMV6 ldpi/mdpi devices are all getting MIUI v4 ports, whats the possibility of getting a port to the wildfire. This thread is just to raise awareness of it, and trying to get some developers involved. I may attempt to get a basic port from the galaxy fit or x10 mini working by using the basic tools in the rom kitchen. But thats the best I can do.
xperia x10 mini rom: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1511495
Oh god I hope this goes through and we get a working MIUI ROM.
I've been loving how MIUI looks ever since I first saw it
This sounds nice. Hopefully someone might look into it.
Sounds good to me, I was reading a thread about how they ported it for an mdpi device earlier today, it still sounds like a lot of work resizing but I think it can be done eventually.
I just read that the Armv6 version probably won't have themes.
I'm afraid it's unlikely themes will ever work because of the proprietary binary which MIUI uses to apply themes. It compiled for arm7 only.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://miuiandroid.com/community/threads/miui-armv6.15487/
EDIT: MIUI is probably closer than we think!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1499411
Actually, the guide is for hdpi only
Some guy got it working in mdpi, but with resizing.
nejc121 said:
I just read that the Armv6 version probably won't have themes.
http://miuiandroid.com/community/threads/miui-armv6.15487/
EDIT: MIUI is probably closer than we think!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1499411
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're going to use that tutorial, use the X10 Mini/Mini Pro version of MIUI most MIUI apps are resized to QVGA. We may have the possiblity of having themes in the future, since more apps are going to be opensourced. Anyway, thanks for providing the link to the tutorial. I'll try it out later.
UPDATE: Turns out its perfectly possible to port between two LDPI devices, I'll get a copy of Ubuntu setup tonight or tommorow, to start editing and compiling. I'll post any updates here.
What about getting help from the Galaxy Mini version?
It has a 3.14" 240x320 display (really close to ours)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1516340
Please let someone take a look at it.
I guess it's a lot of resizing and the like, but I bet we can have it on our htc wildfire
nejc121 said:
What about getting help from the Galaxy Mini version?
It has a 3.14" 240x320 display (really close to ours)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1516340
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll PM the creators of both the X10 Mini and Galaxy Mini rom in a bit. If anyone can, try the tutorial that nejc121 posted. I've had trouble getting the final zip to flash. But maybe I'm doing something wrong..
UPDATE: Think I figured out the issues with my zip. Recompiling and testing in a minuite.
UPDATE II: Didn't work, can someone else try out the tutorial and see what kind of end results they get?
UPDATE III: Final update of tonight. Returned the update-script back to default ICS. leaving out the offending code from the MIUI tutorial.
Justice™ said:
I'll PM the creators of both the X10 Mini and Galaxy Mini rom in a bit. If anyone can, try the tutorial that nejc121 posted. I've had trouble getting the final zip to flash. But maybe I'm doing something wrong..
UPDATE: Think I figured out the issues with my zip. Recompiling and testing in a minuite.
UPDATE II: Didn't work, can someone else try out the tutorial and see what kind of end results they get?
UPDATE III: Final update of tonight. Returned the update-script back to default ICS. leaving out the offending code from the MIUI tutorial.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah gave it a shot... guess you'll be happy to know that it boots, yeah?
Screenshots soon!
VigiDroid said:
Yeah gave it a shot... guess you'll be happy to know that it boots, yeah?
Screenshots soon!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats brilliant news Vigi! Its great to see a dev pick this up!
if we can get this ported well, what would the benifits be over the arco kang cm9?
heavy_metal_man said:
if we can get this ported well, what would the benifits be over the arco kang cm9?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check out the thread in the development section, Its a completely new UI/UX!
MIUI v4 for wildfire: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1517856
What about porting from a wildfire s miui? i donno if our device and that one are similar, but porting from a fully functional Rom is pretty easier than a ics Rom. They still have big problems with calls and other things... so I'll today begin, if possible the porting.
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using XDA App
In contrast to what most people think, the Wildfire and the S version are similar only in looks and name.
The S has a better screen resolution, processor and a GPU.
Sent from my Ainol Novo7 Elf using xda premium
nejc121 said:
In contrast to what most people think, the Wildfire and the S version are similar only in looks and name.
The S has a better screen resolution, processor and a GPU.
Sent from my Ainol Novo7 Elf using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok... but basically my idea is to port a fuly-working rom to the wildy, instead of a cm-dependant one. If a cm7 based miui exists and it's compatible with wildfire, that would be great, it won't be as cool as ICS but it would be a starting point even for other developers, who can still work with android 2.x if they want to;
that's something i'll try to do, i definetly want miui on wildfire, not necessarly ICS miui.
working
yupi
We have rom, where phone does not work/
togno said:
ok... but basically my idea is to port a fuly-working rom to the wildy, instead of a cm-dependant one. If a cm7 based miui exists and it's compatible with wildfire, that would be great, it won't be as cool as ICS but it would be a starting point even for other developers, who can still work with android 2.x if they want to;
that's something i'll try to do, i definetly want miui on wildfire, not necessarly ICS miui.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gingerbread MIUI source is out there. I just haven't seen it compiled it for any armv6 phones. The WFS miui is just a theme and custom launcher and apps. Not true miui.
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using XDA App

[Port] Galaxy Note 10.1

Ok so i have attempted a port of the galaxy note 10.1 jellybean rom, using CM10 as a base i have run into a bootloop you can download this link and try it out also will be my logcat
also if you can tell me how to fix this i would be happy to do it too
Drop Box Port: Galaxy Note 10.1 Port
Logcat:LOGCAT
i believe the error is with my kernal
jnktechstuff said:
Ok so i have attempted a port of the galaxy note 10.1 jellybean rom, using CM10 as a base i have run into a bootloop you can download this link and try it out also will be my logcat
also if you can tell me how to fix this i would be happy to do it too
Drop Box Port: Galaxy Note 10.1 Port
Logcat:LOGCAT
i believe the error is with my kernal
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried other kernel, like eztery or godmachine's kernel?
Sent from my GT-S5570 using Tapatalk 2
10507 said:
Have you tried other kernel, like eztery or godmachine's kernel?
Sent from my GT-S5570 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no if you have it can you please try, I don't feel like installing another kernel, but will work on it
Wow this would be a miracle if this ROM works
yes sir indeed i got my fingers crossed hoping this ROM happens
Did you split your boot.img and change the ramdisk image and such? While retaining the 500 kernel?
If you are going to port something, this is one of the basics.
Just changing a few hardware files, won't work.
MD
Moscow Desire said:
Did you split your boot.img and change the ramdisk image and such? While retaining the 500 kernel?
If you are going to port something, this is one of the basics.
Just changing a few hardware files, won't work.
MD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No i knew i forgot something, did you read the logcat, i dont read logcat but i think it said that it had a memory error
jnktechstuff said:
No i knew i forgot something, did you read the logcat, i dont read logcat but i think it said that it had a memory error
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, you said it all, probably there is no memory in the the place the kernel is trying to setup its stack, is your kernel an A500 one or is it from another machine with a different memory layout? because it smells like the latter.
Cheers
you've also got the think about the ramdisk too . . .
Hey guys i will be on vacation for the next week so i will not be able to work on it, if you want the download link is right up there^^^^
If you get it booting, you will get credit and half of donations:angel:
i am resigning from this project, working on my own custom rom, the stuff is here do it if you want
What happens
jnktechstuff said:
i am resigning from this project, working on my own custom rom, the stuff is here do it if you want
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry to say this but you are a very unstable person, you already made another thread some time ago regarding MIUI in the iconia A500 but you did not finish anything and you quit and now the same thing happens again. You only make people get insterested in something and then you abandon the arena. This is very disgusting and rude for people who try to believe in the developers' work . But Moscow Desire gave you another chance but you did not take advantage of this oportunity-.
Godwarrior1 said:
Sorry to say this but you are a very unstable person, you already made another thread some time ago regarding MIUI in the iconia A500 but you did not finish anything and you quit and now the same thing happens again. You only make people get insterested in something and then you abandon the arena. This is very disgusting and rude for people who try to believe in the developers' work . But Moscow Desire gave you another chance but you did not take advantage of this oportunity-.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree!
Thread Closed
And as such, this thread is closed for eternity. Link will remain for anybody who wants to download it.
MD

[Discussion Thread] About CM10.1 - CM10.2 for the Xperia Play!

Discussions for CM10.1 and CM10.2 for the Xperia Play. If something new is coming. All discussion goes here.
im really for your project.
i hope you fix everything
_____________
a little quastion about bbqlinux
does it have all we need for compiling kernel and cm10(or other cm's) ?
and which version should i download for core i7 ivy brige (64bit) ?
pedyvirus said:
a little quastion about bbqlinux
does it have all we need for compiling kernel and cm10(or other cm's) ?
and which version should i download for core i7 ivy brige (64bit) ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you should stick with Ubuntu 13.04 or else Linux Mint 15
Because bbqlinux its hard to install some updates. Compiling gives alot of errors. I'm switching my OS on Ubuntu 13.04 by this friday
Hurreyyy
[email protected] very happy to hear from u about this great news.so many contributors and members felt shocked of removing ur previous post.but
TAHNKS TO U FROM ME AND FROM ALL OUR XPLAY MEMBERS.WE RESPECT U
So because of viper cmx do u need a new bootlogo from me?
Sent from my SXP [R800i]
CyberScopes said:
So because of viper cmx do u need a new bootlogo from me?
Sent from my SXP [R800i]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Later bro. Let me settle up some things first
Sent from my GT-I9100G using xda premium
So hashy are you continuing your old ROM and kernel or are you starting from scratch?
sent from my Sony Ericsson xperia play ™ (r800x) using Tapatalk 4
crazymonkey05 said:
So hashy are you continuing your old ROM and kernel or are you starting from scratch?
sent from my Sony Ericsson xperia play ™ (r800x) using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup. If can i will start from scratch
@Hashy what happened to your old Kernel and ROM that you would start from scratch ?? I mean any reason for that ?? y not continue dev. cuz that would be easier and faster isn't it.. did the old ROM boot ? did you boot into 4.3 yet I mean through any means ?
saqibkhan said:
@Hashy what happened to your old Kernel and ROM that you would start from scratch ?? I mean any reason for that ?? y not continue dev. cuz that would be easier and faster isn't it.. did the old ROM boot ? did you boot into 4.3 yet I mean through any means ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because i was using Some of Legacy Xperia commits for my kernel. And the dev don't allow anyone to copy his work
I will start my work by this friday and lets see how it goes.
Hashy said:
Because i was using Some of Legacy Xperia commits for my kernel. And the dev don't allow anyone to copy his work
I will start my work by this friday and lets see how it goes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that you can not compete . You should create together---> it is better---> Have a good rom with kernel than 2 ragged rom with 2 kernel. But mike can work on rom and you can work on kernel This is just my opinion sorry for bad english!
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
Hashy said:
Because i was using Some of Legacy Xperia commits for my kernel. And the dev don't allow anyone to copy his work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And that's the reason why we don't have 3.4 kernel and 4.3 ROM yet. It's because nobody wants to share work with others or work together on one kernel and one ROM. Anyway i wish you all luck.
hmmm.. unity is strength.. Xperia play is no more about Cosmic Dans Turbo Kernel.. or Lupus's Kernel.. or AOKP or CyanagenMod.. (I mean all this in a good way) we need a "ROM" 4.2/4.3 for Xperia Play and a "Kernel" for Xperia Play.. the brand, the dev, no matters no more.. and the way things are,, I really think dev's should team up to make one Good Rom.. and One Good Kernel.. cuz I don't think Xperia Play would last till Android 6.0 .. so just this device one good last push.. and see how things work out. Split work will only increase/duplicate work.. delay the ROM/Kernel and maybe the ROM would never get rid of bugs.
Guys I don't think teaming up is going to happen, the old thread got deleted so I can't show you any of the stuff that happened. But it got pretty nasty so lets not bring working together up and just focus on getting a stable 4.3 build for our Xperia Play's
^I'm_With_Stupid said:
Guys I don't think teaming up is going to happen, the old thread got deleted so I can't show you any of the stuff that happened. But it got pretty nasty so lets not bring working together up and just focus on getting a stable 4.3 build for our Xperia Play's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree...hashy I'm sorry I can't really assist you as my play is my daily driver so all my stuff is on it.....but I'm rooting for you!!!
sent from my Sony Ericsson xperia play ™ (r800x) using Tapatalk 4
What about we try CM10.1 first Maybe we can fix those bugs. I think CM10.2 wont be stable enough for our device yet we dont have any stable CM10.1. If you guys still need CM10.2. I'll try my best
Hashy said:
What about we try CM10.1 first Maybe we can fix those bugs. I think CM10.2 wont be stable enough for our device yet we dont have any stable CM10.1. If you guys still need CM10.2. I'll try my best
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually yes that seems like a good idea, as 4.3 is only a minor update of 4.2 and people have had success on the play before building 4.2 (without wifi though). But my main concern is being ready for 4.4, which if it is as ram light as everyone says and runs just as fast as gingerbread as everyone is saying, would be perfect for our Xperia Play's. But beggars can't be choosers as I always say
Hashy said:
What about we try CM10.1 first Maybe we can fix those bugs. I think CM10.2 wont be stable enough for our device yet we dont have any stable CM10.1. If you guys still need CM10.2. I'll try my best
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gee sounds like something I posted before on y don't we get cm10.1 stable on our before we jump 4.3 it made no sense to me but hey what ever works I guess
Sent from my R800x using xda premium
Hashy said:
Because i was using Some of Legacy Xperia commits for my kernel. And the dev don't allow anyone to copy his work
I will start my work by this friday and lets see how it goes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably you haven't understand the problem: the problem wasn't you using some of the lxp's commits, the problem was you not asking permissions like everyone else; now probably mike want let you use his work as a base, but it isn't because he is selfish and didn't allow the other people to use his work, it is because you go against the common rule
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4
^I'm_With_Stupid said:
Actually yes that seems like a good idea, as 4.3 is only a minor update of 4.2 and people have had success on the play before building 4.2 (without wifi though). But my main concern is being ready for 4.4, which if it is as ram light as everyone says and runs just as fast as gingerbread as everyone is saying, would be perfect for our Xperia Play's. But beggars can't be choosers as I always say
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's see then
darkharbinger81 said:
Gee sounds like something I posted before on y don't we get cm10.1 stable on our before we jump 4.3 it made no sense to me but hey what ever works I guess
Sent from my R800x using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That what i was thinking just now. But nevermind.
[email protected] said:
Probably you haven't understand the problem: the problem wasn't you using some of the lxp's commits, the problem was you not asking permissions like everyone else; now probably mike want let you use his work as a base, but it isn't because he is selfish and didn't allow the other people to use his work, it is because you go against the common rule
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Against rule? Bro, Let it be now. I'll work on my way. I don't need any-one permission from now on

Categories

Resources