whilst running Quadrant, there were a few issues that occured to me, The TF is supposed to have a superior GPU so why has Asus capped the frames per second in the graphics benchmark my Xperia X8 which is far less superior than the TF can reach around 50 FPS on the moon orbiting sun graphics, while the TF can only do about 30-35, i was just wondering if this should be an issue
Resolution
rilot said:
Resolution
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
very straightforward answer man.
Nenamark1 => 35fps
Nenamark2 => 18fps
Quadrant => 2528 avg
Smartbench 2011 = 3232
Running Roach's Prime 1.4 (HC 3.1)
Terrible FPS scores in comparison to other inferior devices. The Smartbench scores show it's pretty close to other 1.0ghz HC Tegra2 devices.... but still not great....
Related
http://www.engadget.com/lg-star/preview/
Definitely an impressive piece of hardware, the Nexus S will have to do for now I guess.
A key question:
Does it have any US 3G (850/AWS/1900) band?
If not, it lost a leg.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cULT5ZeI44s&feature=player_embedded
^ video
Yes, such a beautiful phone, is it SLCD? I guess I can bypass SAMOLED if it is.
I am still waiting to see, the first orion-based phones, as they will be without a doubt the fastest phones. I just hope Samsung up the looks of the phones, maybe not so plasticy, more glass is nice though.
Impressive but not a fan of LG phones. Samsung galaxy 2 will be the talk bigining of next year
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
irishrally said:
Engadget just put the LG Start dual core tegra2 running on 2.2 through Quadrant and it only scored 2100. Galaxy S phones have scored much higher than this which makes me feel good about Google's choice. I just hope the file system issues are gone in the Nexus S.
If the dual core LG star was going on sale next Thursday, I would still go for the Nexus S, without a doubt.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My thoughts exactly
Those high 20k plus quadrant scores are due to lagfix that tricks quadrant I/O score not actual performance increase
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
also keep in mind that that phone will probably come to the US 5-10 months from now and probably only be on one provider, and it won't be t-mobile, so if your a t-mobile fan, nexus s is still for you.
You can get a better real world estimate of galaxy s series without using ext2 loop. ie all ext4. Which gives 1400 - 1700 depending on setup. I saw where nexus s did quadrant with ext4 plus some other fs and was comparable: 1400–1500. I'm with above poster, can't wait to see Orion vs tegra2.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Not really impressive if I see the Neocore benchmark.
LG-Star = 67 fps
Nexus S = 55 fps (Engadget review)
My friends HTC Desire HD = 58 fps
My HTC Desire = 27 fps
Well, I would expect at least 1.5 times compared to single core, more than 80 fps.
The difference right now is only 12 fps average ...
But, it might change if the LG Star is also using Android 2.3, that might be more than 67 fps.
Still, 55 fps is more than enough for games !
Also for those who don't know...galaxy s phones gpu is capped at 56 fps seems to be same with NS..not that you really need more that 60fps but score could be much higher.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
gogol said:
Not really impressive if I see the Neocore benchmark.
LG-Star = 67 fps
Nexus S = 55 fps (Engadget review)
My friends HTC Desire HD = 58 fps
My HTC Desire = 27 fps
Well, I would expect at least 1.5 times compared to single core, more than 80 fps.
The difference right now is only 12 fps average ...
But, it might change if the LG Star is also using Android 2.3, that might be more than 67 fps.
Still, 55 fps is more than enough for games !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Heh...my MT4 got 56FPS.
Not bad.
gogol said:
Not really impressive if I see the Neocore benchmark.
LG-Star = 67 fps
Nexus S = 55 fps (Engadget review)
My friends HTC Desire HD = 58 fps
My HTC Desire = 27 fps
Well, I would expect at least 1.5 times compared to single core, more than 80 fps.
The difference right now is only 12 fps average ...
But, it might change if the LG Star is also using Android 2.3, that might be more than 67 fps.
Still, 55 fps is more than enough for games !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nexus S is capped to 55.55* fps, just like the other Galaxy S phones. The phone is maxing out the benchmark
The nenamark1 scores on Nexus S are higher than LG star.
Tegra2 ~ Hummingbird. About the same power.
Rawat said:
Nexus S is capped to 55.55* fps, just like the other Galaxy S phones. The phone is maxing out the benchmark
The nenamark1 scores on Nexus S are higher than LG star.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice try to out do me and talk over me but its 56 not 55.55 lol i just ran 55.8 on neocore
demo23019 said:
Nice try to out do me and talk over me but its 56 not 55.55 lol i just ran 55.8 on neocore
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha it is definitely 56. Quadrant maxes out at 56 as does quake 3 arena.
demo23019 said:
Nice try to out do me and talk over me but its 56 not 55.55 lol i just ran 55.8 on neocore
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not trying to talk over you. It is capped to 55.555*. There's a parameter that can be changed when compiling the kenrel, and it'll be capped at 65fps. Neocore scores 65fps with a kernel that's compiled with the parameter
Anderdroid said:
Haha it is definitely 56. Quadrant maxes out at 56 as does quake 3 arena.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
55.5 rounded up is 56. And 55.55 rounded up is 55.6, which is what my Galaxy S has scored since they day I got it.
EDIT: you can check build.prop, and it mentions (a rounded down) 55fps: windowsmgr.max_events_per_sec=55
this phne may be fast but it's ugly and it also has a skined version of android
The Nexus S does
I wonder if honeycomb runs slow. The highest quadrant standard score I can get is 2130. My atrix was averaging 2650.
My gtablet gets around 3600 with a hack. Xoom, 2200.
Sent from my HTC Vision using Tapatalk
I noticed that the benchmark hung at database writes and very low framerates for the first graphics test. I got 1907 overall...
jondwillis said:
I noticed that the benchmark hung at database writes and very low framerates for the first graphics test. I got 1907 overall...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exact same thing with me. Linpack is in the 30's though.
Could be quadrant is not honeycomb ready like it wasn't for gb till an update
www.redcardgreencard.com
I'm pretty sure that screen resolution is the culprit for the low scores. I ran smart bench and the results were basically double my Droid X. Only difference is in smart bench the graphics sections didn't scale for the screen.
Sent from my XOOM using Tapatalk
Motorola Xoom overclocked to 1.5GHz, eats Quadrant and Linpack for breakfast
Hold on to your hats, gents, because things just got real -- that's a Motorola Xoom in the picture above, clocked at a blazing 1.504GHz. While we highly doubt that's a new world record of any sort, the dual-core Tegra 2 inside seriously screams at that clockspeed, scorching Quadrant to the tune of 3105 (remember this?) and delivering 47 MFLOPS in Linpack. Oh, and in case you're curious, this achievement wasn't some random hack. It was perpetrated for our collective benefit by the master of SetCPU himself, and you'll find full video proof of his accomplishment below and instructions at our source link. Got root? Then you're on your way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey guess what? At 1.5GHz the Nexus S can break 4k without a sweat. Simms22, care to post some of your Quadrant scores
******Official Scoreboard*******
Premier DC Honeycomb Tablet: 0
Google Nexus S: 1
who cares quadrant sucks not to mention it still does not still work correctly with 2.3 i highly doubt its accurate with honeycomb and dualcore CPU
also you're talking about a 4k plus score with voodoo
demo23019 said:
who cares quadrant sucks does not still work correctly with 2.3 i highly doubt its accurate with honeycomb and dualcore CPU
also youre talking about a 4k plus score with voodoo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pardon? What do you mean by Voodoo? If you mean the ext4 hack then the 4k I am referring to was actually before the ext4 hack was implemented. And if its broken for both Gingerbread and Honeycomb then wouldn't it kind of negate the being broken? Since their both broken?
Why do people always have to **** all over everything? It was an interesting post and I found it funny that Engadget would use the phrase "eat for breakfast" when in reality 3.1k is not that impressive. Seriously though, why is it necessary to be an ass instead of just having a laugh? Clearly I posted this in good fun. JFC.
And only scores 47 MFLOPS when the nexus one snapdragon can score higher you going to say nexus one is faster than xoom and Nexus S i dont thin so
Being huge into PC benchmarking and im not impressed with what android currently has for software...Anything that can be manipulated into giving false result is bogus
reminds me of 3dmark vantage with nvidia cards giving off very high inaccurate CPU scores with physx is enabled
....Not saying vantage is bogus
demo23019 said:
And only scores 47 MFLOPS when the nexus one snapdragon can score higher you going to say nexus one is faster than xoom and Nexus S i dont thin so
Being huge into PC benchmarking and im not impressed with what android currently has for software...Anything that can be manipulated into giving false result is bogus
reminds me of 3dmark vantage with nvidia cards giving off very high inaccurate CPU scores with physx is enabled
....Not saying vantage is bogus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which benchmarks if any do you think are valid or quasi valid for the NS? I use Fps2D to test FPS
jlevy73 said:
Which benchmarks if any do you think are valid or quasi valid for the NS? I use Fps2D to test FPS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am using an3DXL for benchmarking as well as nenamark. an3DXL gave results that had the lowest spread, while quadrant was all over the place, having as much as a 500 point different..
Can anyone report on some benchmark scores for the Xoom?
I found this one that Anandtech uses:
http://www.glbenchmark.com/download.jsp
That is a good benchmark for general openGL performance testing. Others are:
Linpack to measure floating-point rate of execution = generally useless score.
Quadrant measures overall system performance
Smartbench 2011 measures general system performance
The xoom scores very well. The scores in GLBenchmarks will seem low, because all tests are run at the native resolution on each device. So a phone with a 480x800 resolution and a tegra 2 will get a much higher score than the xoom with the same processor and a 1280x800 resolution.
Linpack is useless for dual-core devices, it only tests one core.
muyoso said:
The xoom scores very well. The scores in GLBenchmarks will seem low, because all tests are run at the native resolution on each device. So a phone with a 480x800 resolution and a tegra 2 will get a much higher score than the xoom with the same processor and a 1280x800 resolution.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good to know! Hopefully, there will be some dual core benchmarks coming out soon.
Smartbench 2011 just added dual core support! I haven't tried it yet, only quadrant, but am anxious to see the differences.
Sent from the most 'Epic' phone in the world! ...Using XDA Premium app
js042507 said:
Smartbench 2011 just added dual core support! I haven't tried it yet, only quadrant, but am anxious to see the differences.
Sent from the most 'Epic' phone in the world! ...Using XDA Premium app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It runs in a tiny little window on the Xoom. Don't think this is a worthy benchmark for tablets.
Wow!
in SmartBench 2011 I got highest score there - 3895/2466. Some game scores were higher on other devices, but they were overclocked to hell.
I'm impressed.
My results are posted here (benchmark and quadrant) http://4pda.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=173393&st=320#entry6752974
keitht said:
It runs in a tiny little window on the Xoom. Don't think this is a worthy benchmark for tablets.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi guys,
I am the developer of Smartbench 2010/2011.
Basically, I use device independent pixel system for rendering those bitmaps. For some reason, Honeycomb doesn't work so well with DIP. I need to look into why.
On the other hand, I don't believe there's any other benchmarks that spawn multiple symmetric threads for performing multi-core benchmark tests. All CPU tests are absolutely not affected by the screen size/resolution at all, so it shouldn't matter. IMO, I think its a bit premature to deduce that it is not a worthy benchmark from this observation.
And as usual, I am open to suggestions!
(Oh and Hi Arcadia, long time no see! )
hey guys,
i currently own the x10 and have been into rooting and custom roms since i first heard about XDA
now i have ordered my xperia play and it should arrive this wk sometime hopefully wednesday.
i was just wondering what quad & linpack scores ppl were getting on the play compared to my x10
cheers guys
for linpack I got 36.45 MFLOPS at 2.3 sec with precision: 2.22E-16
also for SE sdcard write: 8MB and read: 22MB (this after using sd speed increase, without is %15 less)
m3dteam said:
for linpack I got 36.45 MFLOPS at 2.3 sec with precision: 2.22E-16
also for SE sdcard write: 8MB and read: 22MB (this after using sd speed increase, without is %15 less)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i see and wot about quadrant scores mate
cheers
Quadrant Scores
crispyduckling said:
i see and wot about quadrant scores mate
cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Around 1800
Quadrant Advanced
CPU: 5902
Mem: 1542
IO: 686
2D: 241
3D: 604
Quadrant needs to be updated too much emphasis on CPU & IO.
Techdread said:
Around 1800
Quadrant Advanced
CPU: 5902
Mem: 1542
IO: 686
2D: 241
3D: 604
Quadrant needs to be updated too much emphasis on CPU & IO.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok thanks,
i just did linpack on my x10 and got 34.771
and on quadrant i got 1551 (2nd run)
im running 2.2.1 miui on stock kernel
thought the play would blow it out the water but i suppose the proof is in the gaming and not just benchmark scores
crispyduckling said:
ok thanks,
i just did linpack on my x10 and got 34.771
and on quadrant i got 1551 (2nd run)
im running 2.2.1 miui on stock kernel
thought the play would blow it out the water but i suppose the proof is in the gaming and not just benchmark scores
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree, and the gaming is excellent BackStab, Nova 2 & Asphalt 6 are my current favourites
The Samsung Galaxy S2 & other dual core phones with all their CPU & GPU grunt are pointless for gaming without proper gaming controls IMHO.
Techdread said:
Agree, and the gaming is excellent BackStab, Nova 2 & Asphalt 6 are my current favourites
The Samsung Galaxy S2 & other dual core phones with all their CPU & GPU grunt are pointless for gaming without proper gaming controls IMHO.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
true, all the power in the world cant make up for touch screen gaming
an average powered phone with proper gaming controls will, in my opinion, always beat it
silvacrest said:
true, all the power in the world cant make up for touch screen gaming
an average powered phone with proper gaming controls will, in my opinion, always beat it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes a very good point
i used to use the wii BT controller to play my emulator/games with,
and that was a pain in the ass cuz u needed to
1 rest your phone on summat then hold the wii controller. or
2 like wot i nearly did is to make a holder at work that holds both the phone plus
the controller.
no need for that anymore.. roll on wednesday when my XP arrives
by the way, I did the benchmarks when I was rooted, not sure if it makes a difference. after using it for a month, I would say it is perrty nice, never noticed a lag (even with the time scape thing), emulators (FSPE & N64droid) and GameLoft HD games work on it like a charm. battery is amazing even for games (+ you can get the BB extra charger since they have the same usb).
I really think it is the best phone for me:
-game controls
-Gingerbread
-unlocked bootloader
-one click root
-best Android devices in supporting national languages (helps in re-selling)
-sd card
-great battery
...etc
crispyduckling said:
ok thanks,
i just did linpack on my x10 and got 34.771
and on quadrant i got 1551 (2nd run)
im running 2.2.1 miui on stock kernel
thought the play would blow it out the water but i suppose the proof is in the gaming and not just benchmark scores
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know its an old thread... Just wanted to say, the power is fine and quadrant is good on custom roms and tweaks, overclocking...
stock with custom kernel around 2500
Miui 2650