heres an article from androidcommunity.com http://androidcommunity.com/nexus-s...nce-benchmarks-with-trinity-and-cm7-20110530/
the way i see it, the real winner here is Trinity and our own morfic(@morfique on twitter) as Trinity for the g2x and for the nexus s is on top for both phones.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Are there other comparison benchmarks beside Quadrant? I take quadrant scores about as seriously as stories from AboveTopSecret
Also, overclocking to 1.5ghz.. What do the dual cores do when overclocked? Where are those comparisons?
Also.. Really.. Is a 1.5ghz overclock really an "every day use" type of configuration?
I'm not saying this isn't impressive but you're comparing a Mustang with a racing kit in it to it to a stock Camaro.
styckx said:
Are there other comparison benchmarks beside Quadrant? I take quadrant scores about as seriously as stories from AboveTopSecret
Also, overclocking to 1.5ghz.. What do the dual cores do when overclocked?
Also.. Really.. Is a 1.5ghz overclock really an "every day use" type of configuration?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
heres a smartbench benchmark. and no, 1.5ghz isnt a daily. its more to play with or use when gaming. as you can imagine, battery life wouldnt be the greatest. i use the Trinity 1.1ghz UV as my daily. oh, and the top g2x(dual core) quadrant benchmark is 5587, also using trinity but for the g2x. btw, thats morfics g2x with the top g2x score.
Gotcha.. Don't get me wrong.. It is impressive and I'm all about getting the most out of hardware whether it's from a phone or a PC.
Damn. Now that is impressive. I wonder what the 3D score will be like once they o overclock it. It's going to be awesome!!!!
Most of it is coming from I/O due to ext4, quadrant benchmarks are far from accurate. Anything higher then 2000 (maybe less) is SF.
Dual core phones are definitely better, as well as their GPUs. I can run most of the tegra 2 games just fine tho.
look at that I/O score clearly nexus s it king
1.5 on single core is not faster than 1ghz dual core
Sgs2 ATM is best android out...period it doesn't need ext4 exploit to score 4700 on quadrant
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
lvnatic said:
Most of it is coming from I/O due to ext4, quadrant benchmarks are far from accurate. Anything higher then 2000 (maybe less) is SF.
Dual core phones are definitely better, as well as their GPUs. I can run most of the tegra 2 games just fine tho.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Sgx540 beats the Geforce ulp gpu in the Tegra 2.
So there is no reason that it wouldn't work.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
not saying its not impressive...your CPU OC is impressive that's about it
And only seen a handful of nexus S that can handle these speeds so to say nexus s is still king based on this is laughable im sorry thats my opinion
cant believe androidcommunity made an article on this
also removing the FPS cap on the kernel doesn't do anything for games the screen refresh rate cant handle such high FPS so you dont even see these extra frames when gaming all you're doing is killing your battery
tegra 2 dual core has a huge advantage on gaming.
Just becasue you gain a better score on a benchmark the tegra has an extra core to take some of workload in 3d rendering thats why games like Riptide run great on tegra and slow on our sgx540
im not bashing you simms i respect you and everything you do for the community just think you have a misunderstanding how things are working
demo23019 said:
im not bashing you simms i respect you and everything you do for the community just think you have a misunderstanding how things are working
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i hope that you dont think that i think that a quadrant is an accurate snapshot of this situation, because i dont. quadrant is only meant to benchmark a single core, it even makes the field even between single and dual cores because of that. but, since the community likes to use quadrant as a "standard" for benching, ill throw these benchmarks up to look at. kinda like looking at a freak of nature, not being able to take your eyes off. anyways, since people like to use quadrants to compare android penises, the nexus s has the biggest(for now).
I get what you're saying and were you're coming from. I wont but in anymore enjoy you 1.5ghz wish my phone could run that speed
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Quandrant scores are not a good way to judge device performance. This article explains it all:
http://www.androidcentral.com/how-cheat-android-benchmarks
As the article explains, the big give away is the length of the I/O part of the bar in the OP picture, which shows that the phone has manipulated quadrant benchmark into providing a higher score.
It is still pretty neat to see a +5000 quadrant score, even if it doesn't really mean much.
Like I said, anything higher then 1800-2000 is a fake score.
I can run riptide gt just fine with a 1.3ghz overclocked CPU btw
lvnatic said:
Like I said, anything higher then 1800-2000 is a fake score.
I can run riptide gt just fine with a 1.3ghz overclocked CPU btw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
anything higher than 1800-2000 is a fake score??? then you havent ever been oc'ed to 1.3ghz.. never. btw, at stock speeds you should be getting 2300-2600. what phone are you using? my oc'ed original droid gets 1800-2100
lvnatic said:
Like I said, anything higher then 1800-2000 is a fake score.
I can run riptide gt just fine with a 1.3ghz overclocked CPU btw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those scores are not faked although I do understand that quadrant is not the best barometer for benchmarking. On my Nexus S, stock, I get around 2100. With my G2x, stock, I get about 2700 (and that's mounted on the crappy ext3 filesystem). When using an ext4 kernel my score jumps to 3500.
demo23019 said:
look at that I/O score clearly nexus s it king
1.5 on single core is not faster than 1ghz dual core
Sgs2 ATM is best android out...period it doesn't need ext4 exploit to score 4700 on quadrant
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A point of correction. The SGS2 out of the box is mounted as ext4, which is why it scores great on Quadrant. It's also clocked @ 1.2ghz. 4700 is a bit high for a stock SGS2, its typically around 3700 which is certainly nothing to sneeze out.
Related
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My latest score ;-) Had a couple apps running in the background also.
Running bionix Final rom W/ King Klicks Kernel @ 1.2ghz
Ryans Lag Fix
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Is The Nexus One CPU THAT Good?
BTW...Thats Awesome!!
Erickomen27 said:
Is The Nexus One CPU THAT Good?
BTW...Thats Awesome!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Nexus One has JIT which gives you a a major boost in CPU! JIT is only available on Android 2.2 devices.
SGS phones in the U.S. are only running 2.1 @ the moment. So when 2.2 comes around I'm sure 3000+ Quadrant scores and 30MLOPS will be possible.
player4lifeov said:
The Nexus One has JIT which gives you a a major boost in CPU! JIT is only available on Android 2.2 devices.
SGS phones in the U.S. are only running 2.1 @ the moment. So when 2.2 comes around I'm sure 3000+ Quadrant scores and 30MLOPS will be possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SGS with jit hits around 14.4 on linpack. Look it up though. The processors are different...linpack is optimized for the type of chip in the n1.
Sent from my Fusion powered Vibrant.
player4lifeov said:
The Nexus One has JIT which gives you a a major boost in CPU! JIT is only available on Android 2.2 devices.
SGS phones in the U.S. are only running 2.1 @ the moment. So when 2.2 comes around I'm sure 3000+ Quadrant scores and 30MLOPS will be possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I'm Running 2.2 Major Spped Overhaul But I'm Getting Like 13.7MFLOPS And 1030 Quadrant
Yes Running JIT
(Not Optimized)
player4lifeov said:
The Nexus One has JIT which gives you a a major boost in CPU! JIT is only available on Android 2.2 devices.
SGS phones in the U.S. are only running 2.1 @ the moment. So when 2.2 comes around I'm sure 3000+ Quadrant scores and 30MLOPS will be possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
from what i have read, there are 2 problems with benchmark scores.
1. they favor the processors other then hummingbird (meaning they give false high numbers to other devices and false low numbers to hummingbird processors)
2. bench marks dont always translate into real world/daily use performance of the phone
So if it feels fast and great, who cares what your bench marks are
Do you see that huge Green Part of your score, yup. It is inflating your score by almost 800 points on quandrant.
Vibrant + xda app
Vibrant + xda app
Wtf.
Won't upload my score. Tells me wrong file format ....how? Its PNG.
No lag fix. Stock w/ update jl6
Vibrant + xda app
j56bp said:
No lag fix. Stock w/ update jl6
Vibrant + xda app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice!
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
PaiPiePia said:
Do you see that huge Green Part of your score, yup. It is inflating your score by almost 800 points on quandrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, it is isn't it? So I guess that's my way off falsifying information through this benchmark. Since the benchmark favors snap dragon cpu. ;~}
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
@jb56- Are you running an optimized kernel? That's a really good score
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
My Linpack Is Number One On The SGS Devices
It's not the benchmark app, its Hummingbird not using the full potential of JIT
kboater said:
from what i have read, there are 2 problems with benchmark scores.
1. they favor the processors other then hummingbird (meaning they give false high numbers to other devices and false low numbers to hummingbird processors)
2. bench marks dont always translate into real world/daily use performance of the phone
So if it feels fast and great, who cares what your bench marks are
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't agree with your statements. When strictly running Eclair 2.1, how come almost every benchmark showed that SGS was the fastest 2.1 phone around?
Then throw in Froyo 2.2, and the Dalvik JIT compiler, and suddenly the SGS is no longer the fastest phone.
So if these benchmark apps favor chips other than Hummingbird, how come they showed SGS was the fastest 2.1 phone? Are you saying all these benchmark developers have a conspiracy to show SGS as the fastest 2.1 phone, but the slowest 2.2 phone?
Come on, it's not the benchmarks. IT is the actual Hummingbird CPU being UNABLE to take advantage of the Dalvik JIT compiler.
The benchmarks are pretty accurate, and they are showing that Hummingbird is unable to take advantage of the huge performance gains of Dalvik JIT.
If your argument was to be accurate, then all benchmarks should have favored non hummingbird CPU's running 2.1 also.
I just don't buy it, it's not the benchmark, its Hummingbird not utilizing JIT while other CPU's like Scorpion do.
player4lifeov said:
The Nexus One has JIT which gives you a a major boost in CPU! JIT is only available on Android 2.2 devices.
SGS phones in the U.S. are only running 2.1 @ the moment. So when 2.2 comes around I'm sure 3000+ Quadrant scores and 30MLOPS will be possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually SGS phones that are already running 2.2, and SGS Tablets running Froyo 2.2 have not been able to reach 30MFLOPS. The Hummingbird will NOT gain the huge cpu performance gains from 2.2 Dalvik JIT compiler. Unfortunate but seems to be true.
Just got these results with Eugene's Froyo rom JPA Mancnut R2 with Kernel #69
qreffie said:
Just got these results with Eugene's Froyo rom JPA Mancnut R2 with Kernel #69
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ummm......that's an ok Linpack score I guess
~SB
PaiPiePia said:
Do you see that huge Green Part of your score, yup. It is inflating your score by almost 800 points on quandrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's because it's lag fixed.
Ji6 core kernel and oclf
Here, I prove that synthetic benchmarks fail.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My god.... How the heck did you do it?
Benchmarks are becoming less and less meaningful as people customize and mod their systems more and more.
If I could find a USB port on a cocker spaniel and install Android on it, I could tweak the poor little guy to get 2500 on Quadrant if I really wanted to (and if I didn't have to give the dog back afterwards).
The highest my SGS go is 1517 Quadrant. How you guys mannaged to get 2000 and above.
Using Darky 9.5, dark core 1.4
I got 3147 quadrant with miui rc4 and oc to 1300MHz.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
progene81 said:
The highest my SGS go is 1517 Quadrant. How you guys mannaged to get 2000 and above.
Using Darky 9.5, dark core 1.4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so called lag fix for start, and some other tweaks including OC.
But lag fix itself gives a huge boost in quadrant.
I do agree synthetic benchmarks suck especially concerning phones since there are many chips, and many other optimizations for particular CPUs, and they're not equal in either implementation or HW is so much different that comparisons are pointless.
For instance snapdragon might lack with raw power, and our hummingbird is better, but when it comes to SIMD instruction ALUs snapdragon wins + quadrant's optimization for snapdragon et viola...
rschenck said:
Benchmarks are becoming less and less meaningful as people customize and mod their systems more and more.
If I could find a USB port on a cocker spaniel and install Android on it, I could tweak the poor little guy to get 2500 on Quadrant if I really wanted to (and if I didn't have to give the dog back afterwards).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kinda like this?:
theduckking said:
Kinda like this?:
View attachment 565756
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly, but with a dorsal fin and ramjets.
rschenck said:
Exactly, but with a dorsal fin and ramjets.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry, that's the turbo ARDog (Android Ready Dog) I got. If you want to customize it further you can have mine, PM me with your address if you're interested so I can organize the shipment (or well, fuell and program the GPS of the ARDog, it can fly so why not utilize it^^)
theduckking said:
sorry, that's the turbo ARDog (Android Ready Dog) I got. If you want to customize it further you can have mine, PM me with your address if you're interested so I can organize the shipment (or well, fuell and program the GPS of the ARDog, it can fly so why not utilize it^^)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't there an App for that?
I made this score
Using GingerCriskelo V27 and CF-Root 3.0
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
My score:
+ The feeling of a pretty darn fast ROM
Of course the usage was pretty low over the weekend but still^^
Pretty easy to get 4500-4600 scores on Quadrant with CM7 and a few kernel/system tweaks..
So which tweaks did u set?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Tk-Glitch said:
Pretty easy to get 4500-4600 scores on Quadrant with CM7 and a few kernel/system tweaks..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you 've overclocked to 1200 MHz or still Using 1000?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
w7nt3rmut3 said:
So which tweaks did u set?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1 - Use a RAMdisk for Quadrant storage;
2 - Use old graphics driver from NS;
3 - Overclock.
Overclocking the bus will lead to faster RAM, so faster I/O score from the RAMdisk.
w7nt3rmut3 said:
So you 've overclocked to 1200 MHz or still Using 1000?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, 1.2GHz. Sorry^^.
At 1GHz, ~4000.
And with 1.4GHz, 4800-4900.
1.5GHz here :
Now 1.4GHz only, but with a faster bus speed, resulting in a boost on I/O and memory scores :
EDIT : Added *lololz* screenshot.
EDIT2 : Replaced *lololz* screenshot by a 1.5GHz one for even more LULZ.
EDIT3 : Added faster bus speed to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
edited
10 chars
coldflid said:
Photoshop...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely not. Quadrant is just very easy to fool on the I/O score, as I said : with a ramdisk.
The normal I/O score on CM7 is ~1300, resulting in about 3000 final score @ 1.5GHz. Everyone here with an i9000 can have ~4900 with a light CM7 and 1.4GHz OC using a RAMdisk. It's a dirty hack for sure.
If you take the I/O score away, all the others are genuine. In fact, except the CPU score, they are all higher @ 1.4GHz (because of a faster bus frequency).
If my phone was stable at a higher bus, 5200-5300 should be possible at 1.5GHz, and even more at 1.6GHz (unstable for now on my device until I find a way to stabilize it).
Tk-Glitch said:
Absolutely not. Quadrant is just very easy to fool on the I/O score, as I said : with a ramdisk.
The normal I/O score on CM7 is ~1300, resulting in about 3000 final score @ 1.5GHz. Everyone here with an i9000 can have ~4900 with a light CM7 and 1.4GHz OC using a RAMdisk. It's a dirty hack for sure.
If you take the I/O score away, all the others are genuine. In fact, except the CPU score, they are all higher @ 1.4GHz (because of a faster bus frequency).
If my phone was stable at a higher bus, 5200-5300 should be possible at 1.5GHz, and even more at 1.6GHz (unstable for now on my device until I find a way to stabilize it).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, i didn't mean yours, i totally believe yours, i meant the one on the first post, and now that i look it more closely it doesn't seem fake.
Sorry
Evo Shift 4G benchmark CONTEST - lets get this "best kernel" debate out of the way
Who can beat my Antutu (benchmark program available in market) record?
CM7 nightly, min cpu 1900 mhz, max cpu 1900mhz, Toasty gov, hardware version 0004.
Scarystable compcache disabled:
RAM 612
CPU integer 1221
CPU float-point 518
2d graphics 276
3d graphics 793
database io 535
sdcard write 9.9MB/s 99
sdcard read 17.5 MB/s 175
total score: 4229
Will post more detailed specs later.
If you're getting over 4000, you're doing it right.
Linpack single thread score = 62.33 MFLOPS, Time 1.35 Seconds, Norm Res 5.68, Precision 2.22044604...
Linpack multi thread score = 57.961 MFLOPS, Time 2.91 seconds Norm Res, 3.24, Precision 2.22044604...
P.S. You should use Toasty (or performance gov depending on kernel) for benchmarking and run benchmarks on a fresh boot and close as many apps as possible.
I actually just beat my record.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I haven't ran it yet with the new pershoot, i get better scores with scary. But I'm still a pershoot fan but for all who care I do (ill test the new pershoot later) get better scores with scary
Teleported from my Shifty Speedy using Tapatalk
we now bow to the master
leadfoot99 said:
we now bow to the master
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, you are limited to five thanks per day.
BTW you are running a really old version of Antutu. Latest version is 2.3.1
that was an old score
246 views, 2 replies. Sad.
I thought you all had more balls than that.
Well there is no real best kernel. Its preference and they also act different on different phones.
Sent from my Supreme Shift Minimally!
Just hearing excuses, no numbers.
You want numbers dude I'm hitting 2300+ on Supreme how's them for numbers while your running Round here bragging about barely hitting 4k overclocked to 1.9 on a stripped down aosp ROM I'm doing 2300 on Supreme with 27 widgets set @ STOCK SPEEDS of 806, if you haven't noticed all us big kids don't care about the numbers because their pointless, this isn't a (maybe I shouldn't have used that word) measuring contest
Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk
..........................double post
strapped365 said:
You want numbers dude I'm hitting 2300+ on Supreme how's them for numbers while your running Round here bragging about barely hitting 4k overclocked to 1.9 on a stripped down aosp ROM I'm doing 2300 on Supreme with 27 widgets set @ STOCK SPEEDS of 806, if you haven't noticed all us big kids don't care about the numbers because their pointless, this isn't a (maybe I shouldn't have used that word) measuring contest
Sent from my PG06100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I care. And that's why I made the thread. Want to see how I can get the best performance out of my phone. Obviously, this cannot be done on a sense 3.0 rom until the kernel source gets released.
VICODAN said:
I care. And that's why I made the thread. Want to see how I can get the best performance out of my phone. Obviously, this cannot be done on a sense 3.0 rom until the kernel source gets released.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What where trying to say is the title is misleading the purpose of the thread (or your being misleaded yourself) "the best kernel" is not based on how high the numbers can get on a benchmark score. I've had sense run as fast as AOSP and not get close to its points, For me I get the best performance (when using AOSP) using pershootv9 its very smooth, scary can give numbers in the 4,000's but with my phone its pershoot that responds the best.
High numbers, do NOT measure performance
Sent from my Supreme Shift through a minimal tunnel
notsointeresting said:
What where trying to say is the title is misleading the purpose of the thread (or your being misleaded yourself) "the best kernel" is not based on how high the numbers can get on a benchmark score. I've had sense run as fast as AOSP and not get close to its points, For me I get the best performance (when using AOSP) using pershootv9 its very smooth, scary can give numbers in the 4,000's but with my phone its pershoot that responds the best.
High numbers, do NOT measure performance
Sent from my Supreme Shift through a minimal tunnel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pershoot responds like crap on my phone. I realize there are different hardware versions. This is more of a benchmarker/tweaker thread. I want to see who can get the best benchmarks and with what kernel.
Linpack does a benchmark of raw megaflops. If you don't want to use antutu fine, linpack is good enough for me:
In computing, FLOPS (or flops or flop/s, for floating point operations per second) is a measure of a computer's performance, especially in fields of scientific calculations that make heavy use of floating point calculations, similar to the older, simpler, instructions per second. Since the final S stands for "second", conservative speakers consider "FLOPS" as both the singular and plural of the term, although the singular "FLOP" is frequently encountered. Alternatively, the singular FLOP (or flop) is used as an abbreviation for "FLoating-point OPeration", and a flop count is a count of these operations (e.g., required by a given algorithm or computer program). In this context, "flops" is simply the plural rather than a rate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
stock
Stock rooted 2.2 @806 also. 2331
VICODAN said:
Pershoot responds like crap on my phone. I realize there are different hardware versions. This is more of a benchmarker/tweaker thread. I want to see who can get the best benchmarks and with what kernel.
Linpack does a benchmark of raw megaflops. If you don't want to use antutu fine, linpack is good enough for me:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok that's fine, if thats what your aiming for though the title of this thread is a little misleading.
and when I say each phone functions different its not just by hardware version, yes the shift has 2 (0005 for the newer ones) but theres many other factors that makes the phone respond differently. there not all built the same.
and just to share a linpack score for the hell of it- 42 on Supreme Sense
notsointeresting said:
Ok that's fine, if thats what your aiming for though the title of this thread is a little misleading.
and when I say each phone functions different its not just by hardware version, yes the shift has 2 (0005 for the newer ones) but theres many other factors that makes the phone respond differently. there not all built the same.
and just to share a linpack score for the hell of it- 42 on Supreme Sense
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very good for Sense. Thanks for sharing. Was that multi or single threaded?
doublepost
VICODAN said:
Very good for Sense. Thanks for sharing. Was that multi or single threaded?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Single, since multi-thread is meant more for dual-core phones
notsointeresting said:
Single, since multi-thread is meant more for dual-core phones
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I thought the Shift had a multi threaded processor, dual core or not. Interesting. Thanks for your numbers.
I'm curious to know if anyone has incredible results
I use quadrant and cf- bench, for now I have a quadrant screenshot, this is also my average score:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
I use last Mysam rom with abysskernel 2.5
theendfear said:
I'm curious to know if anyone has incredible results
I use quadrant and cf- bench, for now I have a quadrant screenshot, this is also my average score:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
I use last Mysam rom with abysskernel 2.5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At what cpu speed, 1600-1664-1704?
Use Antutu or CF-Bench...Quadrant is a random number generator.
Mine is fully stock and antutu gives something around 6200, what about others?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
this is my score with cf-bench:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
always with abyssnote kernel 2.5 and mysam rom at 1.66ghz
CPU at 1.7GHz @ Rocket ROM v11
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
@vessk0 wow!! at antutu test 7528 its exellent! I tried now, and don't go up 6900.. I think Its time to change rom =)
Are the 3D benchmarks limited to ±58fps (the refresh rate of the screen)? Is there any v-sync off setting that could unleash the power and give better results?
Yup, as far as i know it's limited to 60 fps. (Correct me if i'm wrong)
vessk0 said:
CPU at 1.7GHz @ Rocket ROM v11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do I saw something wrong?
RAM: 1205
how you do that? can you teach me?
Even better with v12, second in world N7000 chart
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
Hi vessk0, I have the same rom now, but the score is too low
what's your configuration? I tried with 1.7ghz, aggressive task killer in sistem tuner app, 2048mb cache on sd and noop setted in I/O scheduler section.. the score is around 6900-7000 points
For benchmark I use 1.7GHz @ Performance governer, but internal SD card in settings of Antutu. That's it.
vessk0 said:
For benchmark I use 1.7GHz @ Performance governer, but internal SD card in settings of Antutu. That's it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
every time I use 1.7GHz and performance gov. my phone allways freezes.
I tried some different roms and kernels but same result
any advice?
k-12 said:
every time I use 1.7GHz and performance gov. my phone allways freezes.
I tried some different roms and kernels but same result
any advice?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check your voltages, try to reduce it to 1325-1350 for 1.7 (default is 1450). That'll help it run cooler, and make it less likely to lock up.
But that said, you may just have an Exynos chip that is not happy at that speed, there is no guarantee that they can all do 1.7.
Rocket ROM V12/Abyss 2.6 @1.7GHz Performance Governor:
Quadrant
Linpack
Antutu
CF-Bench
SunSpider
BrowserMark
Vellamo
And here's a fairly recent benchmark of the Droid Razr with some other phones...you can use this as rough basis of comparison.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5198/motorola-droid-razr-review-a-better-clad-bionic/8
TL;DR: The Note really kicks ass when you crank up the clocks!
@croak I have tested your same combination rom/kernel and for now seems the best! with performance gov and cpu set to 1.7ghz the score is very higher in all tests
our note is one of the most promising device, estimating that the development is just at the beginning point
What's going to be amazing is how fast the upcoming A15-based Exynos will be. Clock for clock, it's supposed to be 20% faster than A9 cores. And they will be shipping at 2Ghz!
I expect that the A15 Exynos dual-core will outperform a quad-core Tegra 3 and use a lot less power doing it. And it'll be cheaper to make.
Croak said:
I expect that the A15 Exynos dual-core will outperform a quad-core Tegra 3 and use a lot less power doing it. And it'll be cheaper to make.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One of the 3 can not be right. If it outperform a quadcore hardly will be needing less power. If it needs less power hardly will outperform quadcores and at end if both are true then no way to be cheaper!!!!
From quadlogic!!!
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
Hi everyone!
Last night I was sitting with a friend of mine and tried to tell him that the Nexus 4 was faster than his Galaxy S3. He wanted to test it out and we both downloaded Quadrant Standard and ran the test...
Let's just say that I had to eat my words. I had a fresh install of CM10.1's latest nightly installed. The strange thing was that I was expecting the CPU to max out at 1500~MHz but it still stated 1100~ whilst the S3 was around 1400Mhz.
I went into the Performance menu and set it to PERFORMANCE but still the score was lower. My friend's S3 also had a custom ROM so was thinking that maybe the extra 1GB of RAM in the N4 may give a higher score.
What happened?
so because the s3 scores higher in quadrant, youre thinking that its a faster phone?
Quadrant scores literally mean nothing. You can't compare scores from different hardware on different versions of android running different rooms.
The s3 is a great all around performer that scores above average in all categories. The Nexus 4 scores higher in some categories (mostly hardware and software) but scores lower in others (camera, speaker)
thermal throttling
ZAnwar said:
Hi everyone!
Last night I was sitting with a friend of mine and tried to tell him that the Nexus 4 was faster than his Galaxy S3. He wanted to test it out and we both downloaded Quadrant Standard and ran the test...
Let's just say that I had to eat my words. I had a fresh install of CM10.1's latest nightly installed. The strange thing was that I was expecting the CPU to max out at 1500~MHz but it still stated 1100~ whilst the S3 was around 1400Mhz.
I went into the Performance menu and set it to PERFORMANCE but still the score was lower. My friend's S3 also had a custom ROM so was thinking that maybe the extra 1GB of RAM in the N4 may give a higher score.
What happened?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Nexus 4 has got some heavy thermal throttling problems, search for this term on these forums and you'll find plenty of info about it. Basically, the Nexus 4 is the only phone that is unable to keep running at the stated max clock frequenzy for more than ~5-10 minutes, because it would overheat. After a few minutes, it will throttle the performance. This is also the reason it sucks so hard on benchmarks, compared to other phones with exactly the same hardware.
IINexusII said:
so because the s3 scores higher in quadrant, youre thinking that its a faster phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not at all. I was just wondering what would cause the large discrepancy in the score.
jb91 said:
The Nexus 4 has got some heavy thermal throttling problems, search for this term on these forums and you'll find plenty of info about it. Basically, the Nexus 4 is the only phone that is unable to keep running at the stated max clock frequenzy for more than ~5-10 minutes, because it would overheat. After a few minutes, it will throttle the performance. This is also the reason it sucks so hard on benchmarks, compared to other phones with exactly the same hardware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read a little bit about the throttling but didn't think that it was that prevalent.
Thanks for the info!
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6440/google-nexus-4-review/3
check out the benchmarks here when anandtech put the N4 in a freezer. It tops every android phone on almost every test(and it still suffered from thermal throttling ). Any benchmark done for the browser will be slow bc chrome sucks for mobile phones. The AOSP browser will have higher results
jeff5891 said:
thermal throttling
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does NOT throttle in quadrant ... It just sucks on android 4.2
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I watched it throughout the test ... It did NOT throttle and scored 4641
I noticed that it didn't use cores 3-4 in graphics tests however
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
italia0101 said:
It does NOT throttle in quadrant ... It just sucks on android 4.2
I watched it throughout the test ... It did NOT throttle and scored 4641
I noticed that it didn't use cores 3-4 in graphics tests however
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not necessary to use CPU at full power for graphics tests. The GPU is what is put under stress.
How do you say
throughout the test ... It did NOT throttle and scored 4641
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and then say
it didn't use cores 3-4 in graphics tests however
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats called throttling
jeff5891 said:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6440/google-nexus-4-review/3
check out the benchmarks here when anandtech put the N4 in a freezer. It tops every android phone on almost every test(and it still suffered from thermal throttling ). Any benchmark done for the browser will be slow bc chrome sucks for mobile phones. The AOSP browser will have higher results
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Holy ****. That's incredibly... worrying. Like someone added a .5 to reference volts or something. It really shouldn't get that hot.
But also incredibly nice cause the scores as so tasty. For 2 minutes at a time. Imagine what its doing to the battery as well!
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
jeff5891 said:
How do you say
and then say
thats called throttling
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it isn't .. It doesn't use all the cores all the time for everything..
even if I fire up GTA 3 , straight away it isn't using all the cores, and in fact doesn't use cores 3 and 4 at any time in GTA3 , it isnt throttling here,
The only benchmark iv seen the Nexus 4 throttle on is glbenchmark when ALL the tests are ticked, which is like a 15-20 min test at full load
Dsmboost was correct in the previous post as well , hence why not all the cores are being used when in games.
Can pretty much bet anything that its not throttling in 1 run of quadrant ...
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
italia0101 said:
No it isn't .. It doesn't use all the cores all the time for everything..
even if I fire up GTA 3 , straight away it isn't using all the cores, and in fact doesn't use cores 3 and 4 at any time in GTA3 , it isnt throttling here,
The only benchmark iv seen the Nexus 4 throttle on is glbenchmark when ALL the tests are ticked, which is like a 15-20 min test at full load
Dsmboost was correct in the previous post as well , hence why not all the cores are being used when in games.
Can pretty much bet anything that its not throttling in 1 run of quadrant ...
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As further evidence, I see no difference in frame rate when limiting my gs2's cpu at 800mhz vs 1.2ghz when playing graphically intense games.