Database Users

What happened to the original Full HDMI?

I know that before team win was working on Full HDMI there was someone else that already had a beta out. If I remember correctly, it was fully functional compared to the one put out by team win. Where can I find this at?
Thanks,
Jhoffy22

jhoffy22 said:
I know that before team win was working on Full HDMI there was someone else that already had a beta out. If I remember correctly, it was fully functional compared to the one put out by team win. Where can I find this at?
Thanks,
Jhoffy22
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Violation of GPL. The developer only released a public beta to get people to buy it once of is released.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App

Also, you should be able to find it in the Evo 4G roots and hacks forum at www.androidcentral.com

Oh, that kind of sucks. I was hoping to try this app out now that I just got my new HD tv. I've been hearing that the one released by team win is not fully functional.

jhoffy22 said:
Oh, that kind of sucks. I was hoping to try this app out now that I just got my new HD tv. I've been hearing that the one released by team win is not fully functional.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The other guys app isn't fully functional neither, its still considered a beta also. The team win hdmi is free as compared to the guy orrembas(android central) has a trial. He said when his app hits the market the trial will automatically end and not work you will need to pay for it. I've used both apps and only thing the other guys has is sound(which isn't all that great cause it flickers while team wins doesn't). Good luck
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk

Rem3Dy said:
Violation of GPL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Incorrect. One of the kernels to enable the HDMI app was in violation of GPL and that was pulled by the dev in order to comply with GPL rules. The app does not violate anything and neither does the stock kernel with the HDMI drivers.

I miss the hdmi

tnettles20 said:
I miss the hdmi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How do you miss something you've pretty much never had? lol Either way, no worries. Sooner than later, you will have options as far as HDMI mirroring goes. I find myself getting a lot more use out of my phone now with this feature. It really is awesome.

jhoffy22 said:
I know that before team win was working on Full HDMI there was someone else that already had a beta out. If I remember correctly, it was fully functional compared to the one put out by team win. Where can I find this at?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.androidcentral.com/htc...dmi-official-fullhdmi-beta-discussion-38.html
Based on the Latest post it will be hitting the market pretty soon.
Still no update on if he will release the custom drivers he wrote so they can be integrated into other kernels, although I believe that the drivers aren't needed in the new version, he is able to use the App in software mode.
Hardware mode requires drivers and overclocking which is what was in violation of GPL. Last I checked neither Team win or orrebmas has realeased source code to their Kernels.

detcup4evr said:
http://forum.androidcentral.com/htc...dmi-official-fullhdmi-beta-discussion-38.html
Based on the Latest post it will be hitting the market pretty soon.
Still no update on if he will release the custom drivers he wrote so they can be integrated into other kernels, although I believe that the drivers aren't needed in the new version, he is able to use the App in software mode.
Hardware mode requires drivers and overclocking which is what was in violation of GPL. Last I checked neither Team win or orrebmas has realeased source code to their Kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The HDMI drivers from orrebmas have been public for a long while now. It would be up to the kernel cookers to compile them into the existing and/or future kernels builds.

rugedraw said:
The HDMI drivers from orrebmas have been public for a long while now. It would be up to the kernel cookers to compile them into the existing and/or future kernels builds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excellent, I guess I missed that, Thanks
Hopefully only a matter of time before some new Kernels are released, using the SBC one concerns me a little.

dirkyd3rk said:
I've used both apps and only thing the other guys has is sound(which isn't all that great cause it flickers while team wins doesn't). Good luck
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sound and multiple resolution support and software mirroring for non-rooted phones and displays fullscreen (no side bars) at 720p and 800x600. Shall I continue?

[Q] Xoom Honeycomb Port

So, seeing as we all want us some Honeycomb, what would it take to get the Honeycomb on Xoom ported to Adam?
Sent from my ERIS GSBv2.1 using XDA App

Honeycomb source AND some packages from NVIDIA for the harmony dev board supporting HC.
We will also be able to port it over from the Malata tablets once they get it.

Why harmony if NI is switching to Ventana?
Sent from my ERIS GSBv2.1 using XDA App

Amon Darthir said:
Why harmony if NI is switching to Ventana?
Sent from my ERIS GSBv2.1 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here's the quick version: Rohan is on something.

Amon Darthir said:
Why harmony if NI is switching to Ventana?
Sent from my ERIS GSBv2.1 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you link to your source for this?

no6969el said:
Can you link to your source for this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here's where he first says it. According to then and their sources, only Ventana can run Honeycomb.
http://notionink.wordpress.com/2011/02/08/in-the-mean-time/
And I believe they've already made the switch to Ventana.
http://notionink.wordpress.com/2011/02/15/991/
Sent from my ERIS GSBv2.1 using XDA App

So its alot harder then just changing out the drivers then huh?
Sent from my ERIS GSBv2.1 using XDA App

Well, the update they released after that still said Harmony

Most likely because its still 2.2. NVidia says they are only supporting Ventana going forward from 2.3. Can anyone confirm which the Xoom is running?
Sent from my ERIS GSBv2.1 using XDA App

So I'm guessing that we just don't have a developer with enough skills to get us any Honeycomb love. The Nook is running the SDK and we don't even appear to have anyone trying. Running the SDK at the least would be better than nothing.

get to it then
Sounds like you have your work cut out for you. I can promise if it was currently possible we have ppl on it.

Amon Darthir said:
So I'm guessing that we just don't have a developer with enough skills to get us any Honeycomb love. The Nook is running the SDK and we don't even appear to have anyone trying. Running the SDK at the least would be better than nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The issue is the way the SDK emulates the processor among other things. Its not possible and many skilled devs have tried plus having a $1100…+ bounty.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App

Why do people not use the search functions, or services like google(we all have a google android device right)? Look no HC till we get the source code or can straight copy from device "A" with HC that is the same thing as device "B" without hc. SDK is the preview, it has no graphic acceleration and is ment for computer based emulation or single core emulation, like which is found in the nook color. People leave HC alone, if a DEV makes it, thank them with all your heart, dont stress them with trying to appease the mass. More than likely you should start spamming the forum with request for icecream because honeycomb may never be available to us because of googles decisions with the source.

Can a dev put a simular post like this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=974503
for this forum

I still fail to see why we NEED to have source. With the similarities between the Xoom and the Adam (same processor etc) what else do we need to make a port? Why is the source so important?

Amon Darthir said:
I still fail to see why we NEED to have source. With the similarities between the Xoom and the Adam (same processor etc) what else do we need to make a port? Why is the source so important?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source is important to get everything working correctly. However, porting is possible if someone has the knowledge on how to do it. The devs that have these devices are darn good at what they do but we are hurting in this particular area. Not much to be done about it though.

daiuton said:
Can a dev put a simular post like this
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=974503
for this forum
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you don't like these posts then quit reading them. Stuff like this is hilarious coming from a newb.

blazingwolf said:
Source is important to get everything working correctly. However, porting is possible if someone has the knowledge on how to do it. The devs that have these devices are darn good at what they do but we are hurting in this particular area. Not much to be done about it though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats what I figured. I would work on it if I had any idea of what to do. I just do some app developing though so I have no skills. Thing is the emulator doesn't work well enough for me to test out my app. Thats why I'm asking what it takes to get this thing ported. I need it running like yesterday.

Amon Darthir said:
Thats what I figured. I would work on it if I had any idea of what to do. I just do some app developing though so I have no skills. Thing is the emulator doesn't work well enough for me to test out my app. Thats why I'm asking what it takes to get this thing ported. I need it running like yesterday.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What issues are you having with the emulator?
If you can't get that working take your app in to a store that sells the XOOM (Verizon, Staples, BestBuy, etc), load it up on there to test and then delete it when your done. Not the most elegant solution but it will work in a pinch.

blazingwolf said:
What issues are you having with the emulator?
If you can't get that working take your app in to a store that sells the XOOM (Verizon, Staples, BestBuy, etc), load it up on there to test and then delete it when your done. Not the most elegant solution but it will work in a pinch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha. Very true. The problem is as of last night the project file is 829 MB. Thats why it won't run on the emulator. I don't know how to get it to accept however large that APK file will be once compiled. Other then the emulator just being slow thats my main problem. I can live with the slowness though. Just need to give it a ton more memory. Haha.
O. And the file is only going to get larger if things go as planned. Haha

Blurry Bread

Is anyone out there using Drod's blurrybread rom? If so, is the CRT animation enabled? Or can I just use the same file I used for the stock gingerbread for it?

Yes. Yes. and Yes it works well.. ..I'm not sure what file your referring to for stock gingerbread though.

I was refering to the zip file that I flashed to enable it for the stock gb but since it's already there I wont need it. I'll be flashing as soon as I can

+1 for blurrybread.
My only complaint so far, is my swype license doesn't want to stick around after reboots and has to be regenerated.

Jmoney47 said:
I was refering to the zip file that I flashed to enable it for the stock gb but since it's already there I wont need it. I'll be flashing as soon as I can
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh ok. Well yeah if needed that can be flashed again.

anyone know if blurrybread is going to be updated to the official GB release? i really like it and don't really want to load the official until drod has had his way with it.

I could be wrong...but Im pretty sure drod said on twitter that hes developing solely for the thunderbolt now.
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App

Yep looks like that..he doesn't even reply to inquiries ..beginning to hate these devs..

ram130 said:
Yep looks like that..he doesn't even reply to inquiries ..beginning to hate these devs..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That seems to be a characteristic for almost all the devs these days. No offence to their work, but they could be a lot more supportive of their followers

Jmoney47 said:
That seems to be a characteristic for almost all the devs these days. No offence to their work, but they could be a lot more supportive of their followers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep or at least say "im moving on" or not working on it again in their thread damn .

well... that's a bumber. at least it didn't seem like he had done a ton with blurry bread anyway. hopefully someone with the skills will do the same. it was really just some "basic" tweaks to the base rom. nothing particularly major. i'd do it but don't have that level of skill... but surely someone out there will do something similar. i hope at least.

Froyo (CM6) on Nexus S

Let me first start by saying the rom doesnt boot completely. It boots all the way to when the screen dims and vibrates, when it is about to display lockscreen.. Logcat shows everything installing and starting correctly.. It wasn't hard to get to this stage, so it gave me a little bit of confidence in this awesome project.. Froyo was my favorite android version, as it was a huge upgrade for my old hero.
I thought it would be hilarious to release cm6 for the nexus s, heck I would have run it for the rest of my nexus's lifetime.
So, let me know what you guys think.. keep digging around to get it booting or give up because its old news..
If anyone wants to help for just a fun proof of concept project, or just to poke around, lemme know, the more the merrier
That is all. Waste of a thread, but that is what the general section is for.

LOL in this time and age running froyo is like going back to xp from windows 7. But yeah as a proof of concept its kind of interesting;-) What would be really interesting, is running gingerbread on the gnx

Oh wow.... I don't even know what to say.....
I would absolutely try this out

I'd rock cm6 on my nexus. For "old times sake" it's like banging your ex.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium

Banging your ex is like eating digested food.
thedudejdog said:
I'd rock cm6 on my nexus. For "old times sake" it's like banging your ex.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium

shabgard said:
Banging your ex is like eating digested food.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
doesnt it sounds as good as forcing your poop back into your....

wugui said:
doesnt it sounds as good as forcing your poop back into your....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's exactly what it's like.

swamp goblin said:
Let me first start by saying the rom doesnt boot completely. It boots all the way to when the screen dims and vibrates, when it is about to display lockscreen.. Logcat shows everything installing and starting correctly.. It wasn't hard to get to this stage, so it gave me a little bit of confidence in this awesome project.. Froyo was my favorite android version, as it was a huge upgrade for my old hero.
I thought it would be hilarious to release cm6 for the nexus s, heck I would have run it for the rest of my nexus's lifetime.
So, let me know what you guys think.. keep digging around to get it booting or give up because its old news..
If anyone wants to help for just a fun proof of concept project, or just to poke around, lemme know, the more the merrier
That is all. Waste of a thread, but that is what the general section is for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are incompatibility. Because Nexus S is the first Gingerbread-device, Androi 2.3.0 is the lowest compatibly OS version.
You also can't install System V(AT&T's Unix system since about 1970) in your computer.

biergaizi said:
They are incompatibility. Because Nexus S is the first Gingerbread-device, Androi 2.3.0 is the lowest compatibly OS version.
You also can't install System V(AT&T's Unix system since about 1970) in your computer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes this is true, but the point is that its almost booting.. I knew this from the start, it will require back porting drivers and probably a few kernel edits, but it may be possible.. in the end its just Linux running on a few upgraded drivers and a few kernel changes..

biergaizi said:
You also can't install System V(AT&T's Unix system since about 1970) in your computer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not without doing some back porting.
This is much easier to do from Gingerbread back to Froyo though, since you are building something to run on the same hardware and software stack (ARM and Android 2.x). The most difficult part would be getting drivers to work, but just as older drivers are made to work on new OS versions with shims and other tricks, in theory this is possible, if not a lot of work.
I'm not sure what will be gained though. Gingerbread didn't seem like a significant resource drain over Froyo, so I can't imagine there are any speed/power gains.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using XDA

Do it!

Chinpokomon said:
Not without doing some back porting.
This is much easier to do from Gingerbread back to Froyo though, since you are building something to run on the same hardware and software stack (ARM and Android 2.x). The most difficult part would be getting drivers to work, but just as older drivers are made to work on new OS versions with shims and other tricks, in theory this is possible, if not a lot of work.
I'm not sure what will be gained though. Gingerbread didn't seem like a significant resource drain over Froyo, so I can't imagine there are any speed/power gains.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah not really much to gain, but how awesome would it be to be able to be able to add to the list of things that can run on the nexus s.. and froyo on the flagship gingerbread device? against all rules

Swamp i will join you even this is a complete stupid idea we can do it for the fun. And if this work i know a couple of good froyo roms to port so may i join you
Sent from my Amazon Kindle Fire using Tapatalk

What about cupcake?
In all seriousness though, froyo would make a great ROM. and It should in theory be faster than GB.

swamp goblin said:
Yeah not really much to gain, but how awesome would it be to be able to be able to add to the list of things that can run on the nexus s.. and froyo on the flagship gingerbread device? against all rules
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How about cupcake next
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

Lol this would be funny to run and remember the eye burn from the menu and setting being black text with white back ground
Sent from my A500 using Tapatalk

Great Idea! I also thougt already how older Android Versions would run on the Nexus S.
When 2.2 is running, you guys should start porting 1.6 ;-)
Doesn't it help, that the similar SGS already was running 2.2?

Wow...you are amazing swamp goblin.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA

coolfranz said:
Great Idea! I also thougt already how older Android Versions would run on the Nexus S.
When 2.2 is running, you guys should start porting 1.6 ;-)
Doesn't it help, that the similar SGS already was running 2.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, its funny because I tried porting a froyo touchwiz rom from the og epic, and it got to pretty much the same place when booting haha.. hopefully I can get this working, along with other variations of froyo, that would be the greatest achievement for me in any android related stuff.

ParanoidAndroid for the TF101

Any thoughts on if you guys would want it? I know I do!!
I have been trying the past few days to make a port from source but I don't know how to code and the code wont fully download.
If anybody else wants to try, please do cause I really want it ParanoidAndroid on my device here.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using XDA Premium HD app

My limited knowledge of Paranoid Android leads me to ask - why do you want it on the Tf?
Isn't it designed to give a tablet like experience on phones?
As well made as it is, I wasn't overly keen on the whole tiny u.i on my sgs2.
Otherwise I'm not sure what we would be missing out on.

Application-specific DPI settings would make me one happy panda.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk 2

scottyf79 said:
My limited knowledge of Paranoid Android leads me to ask - why do you want it on the Tf?
Isn't it designed to give a tablet like experience on phones?
As well made as it is, I wasn't overly keen on the whole tiny u.i on my sgs2.
Otherwise I'm not sure what we would be missing out on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I want it because I like the Nexus 7 UI better and also some companies make better phone apps then they do Tablet versions.

dotmaniac said:
I want it because I like the Nexus 7 UI better and also some companies make better phone apps then they do Tablet versions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I have actually compiled ParanoidAndroid 2.12 jellybean rom for the tf101... is a big buggy, but you're welcome to try it...
Just need to try a couple more things to sort out a couple of bugs...
btw, I'm not a developer, and just started compiling, so it will not be perfect at any stage...

mattmanwrx said:
Hi, I have actually compiled ParanoidAndroid 2.12 jellybean rom for the tf101... is a big buggy, but you're welcome to try it...
Just need to try a couple more things to sort out a couple of bugs...
btw, I'm not a developer, and just started compiling, so it will not be perfect at any stage...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow nice, do you have a download link? id like to give it a try

JoinTheRealms said:
Wow nice, do you have a download link? id like to give it a try
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm just compiling another build now... will test that and then give out a download link tomorrow...
If there is enough interest, I may create a thread in the development section...
As I said though, it is quite buggy...
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium

mattmanwrx said:
I'm just compiling another build now... will test that and then give out a download link tomorrow...
If there is enough interest, I may create a thread in the development section...
As I said though, it is quite buggy...
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is too late for me though!
My TF101 got run over by a School Bus! But I hope everybody else enjoys it then!

I would love to see this rom on the tf101

dotmaniac said:
It is too late for me though!
My TF101 got run over by a School Bus! But I hope everybody else enjoys it then!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, that's a shame... hopefully the school helped towards a new one? Could have got away with homework being on it though and getting an extension...
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
---------- Post added at 02:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:28 PM ----------
i9apps said:
I would love to see this rom on the tf101
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will post it later... my build last night didn't do what I wanted it to, as soon as I get home from work I will sync and build again... should be done around half 8 GMT (is half 2 GMT now)...
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium

could be interesting. woud be nice to see if any of our other devs would be interested in helping you to iron out the imperfections and take it forward.
Always nice to have an extra rom to mess with
Quick yes or no ? for you......dock supported?

scottyf79 said:
could be interesting. woud be nice to see if any of our other devs would be interested in helping you to iron out the imperfections and take it forward.
Always nice to have an extra rom to mess with
Quick yes or no ? for you......dock supported?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes - dock is supported... Well, at least it was working for me last night... Don't have a large SD card to test on it, but it should work (as i'm using the same device tree as others)...
As stated earlier, this is my first proper build (running a CM10 build on my phone, not released though). It would be nice to get others to help, at the moment, ADB doesn't work, everything I have tested is working, including Paranoid Settings... None of my builds seems to have ADB, so i do need to look into that!
As there seems to be enough interest, I think I will open a thread later - will link to it here though so you can all see it!

nice - look forward to it.:good:

Please make this happen

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=31770791#post31770791 - thread as promised...