Nexus S Specs - Nexus S General

Does anyone else find it odd that this xmas the Nexus S will hit T-Mobile and it... doesn't support 4g networks?!
http://www.intomobile.com/2010/11/11/nexus-s-specs-leak/

luckyduck69 said:
Does anyone else find it odd that this xmas the Nexus S will hit T-Mobile and it... doesn't support 4g networks?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, on a technicality, T-Mobile doesn't have 4G (but then neither does anyone). However, yes, it is surprising that its only 7.2mbps down and 5.76 up, which doesn't seem like a big change from the Nexus One.
What's frustrating is that they might release this for T-Mobile now, and a few months later, they'll release an AT&T version, just like the N1. If its a Googlephone, why can't they make it pentaband 3G?!
On a side note, would have been nice if it had a LTE radio. Heck, even CDMA capability too.

5MP Camera
512MB Ram (Rumor)
I wanted it to be an upgrade from the N1 in everyway
eg. 8MP camera
756MB Ram
And theyre both on the D'HD

t-mobile does not has 4G...

MacaronyMax said:
5MP Camera
512MB Ram (Rumor)
I wanted it to be an upgrade from the N1 in everyway
eg. 8MP camera
756MB Ram
And theyre both on the D'HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya i don't agree with the rumors..But if the nexus is coming from Samsung..I guess everything is possible...

shr said:
Ya i don't agree with the rumors..But if the nexus is coming from Samsung..I guess everything is possible...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dudez Nothing is in stone. The Nexus S may still have HSPA+. Wait for an official spec sheet.

Anderdroid said:
Dudez Nothing is in stone. The Nexus S may still have HSPA+. Wait for an official spec sheet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's why i said..I don't agree with the rumors...
I am waiting for the Official spec sheet.Haven't searched yet stil i guess GSMarena would be the 1st place i'd search...

4g and hspa+ are soo stupid cliché-s in usa , in europ my hspa speed **** on the usa 4g and hspa+ speeds(what is it 1.5mb 3.5g and 3mb tops 4g ?? i get 5mb+ easy) theres absolutely no need to them cuz the network is inferior to the speed of the hspa technology

yeah, i'm not an idiot 4g sponsor by any means. i just found it odd that the accidental best buy ad shows the phone will not support it. if this turns out to be true then gingerbread better be some epic software upgrade in itself.

souljaboy said:
4g and hspa+ are soo stupid cliché-s in usa , in europ my hspa speed **** on the usa 4g and hspa+ speeds(what is it 1.5mb 3.5g and 3mb tops 4g ?? i get 5mb+ easy) theres absolutely no need to them cuz the network is inferior to the speed of the hspa technology
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ummm. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Where I live:
AT&T 3G ~1.5mbps (Motorola Backflip)
Cricket 3G ~1.5mbps (Samsung Fascinate)
T-Mobile 3G ~7.2mbps (Samsung Vibrant)
T-Mobile HSPA+ "4G" ~10.2mbps (HTC G2)
My Pittsburgh T-Mobile speeds **** on your europ

Anderdroid said:
Ummm. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Where I live:
AT&T 3G ~1.5mbps (Motorola Backflip)
Cricket 3G ~1.5mbps (Samsung Fascinate)
T-Mobile 3G ~7.2mbps (Samsung Vibrant)
T-Mobile HSPA+ "4G" ~10.2mbps (HTC G2)
My Pittsburgh T-Mobile speeds **** on your europ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lmao no they don't 14.2mps lol

Anderdroid said:
Ummm. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Where I live:
AT&T 3G ~1.5mbps (Motorola Backflip)
Cricket 3G ~1.5mbps (Samsung Fascinate)
T-Mobile 3G ~7.2mbps (Samsung Vibrant)
T-Mobile HSPA+ "4G" ~10.2mbps (HTC G2)
My Pittsburgh T-Mobile speeds **** on your europ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
12mbps on hspa, and Im currently in a city of only 15,000 people.
Face it, the USA has terrible high speed mobile connectivity in most places!

lonelykatana said:
12mbps on hspa, and Im currently in a city of only 15,000 people.
Face it, the USA has terrible high speed mobile connectivity in most places!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea..I wish it was more consistent ..now I don't mind switching to Verizon for that consistency..2mbps is enough for me on the go.
souljaboy said:
4g and hspa+ are soo stupid cliché-s in usa , in europ my hspa speed **** on the usa 4g and hspa+ speeds(what is it 1.5mb 3.5g and 3mb tops 4g ?? i get 5mb+ easy) theres absolutely no need to them cuz the network is inferior to the speed of the hspa technology
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U a ediat ...
check out t-mobile network speeds:
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=249176&id=108726828894

Anderdroid said:
Ummm. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Where I live:
AT&T 3G ~1.5mbps (Motorola Backflip)
Cricket 3G ~1.5mbps (Samsung Fascinate)
T-Mobile 3G ~7.2mbps (Samsung Vibrant)
T-Mobile HSPA+ "4G" ~10.2mbps (HTC G2)
My Pittsburgh T-Mobile speeds **** on your europ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i was going to let it go and let him be amazed when he discovered this. but...cool! lol

nice job guys now we ****tin rite back at em
the usa speeds im talkin about were in houses in various phone reviews eg. real life numbers not standing on the street or in a metropolis
back to my point
14.4 Mbit/s HSDPA max speed
21 Mbit/s HSPA+ max speed
ur damn network is nowhere close to these , stop being obessed with new marketing abbreviations
by the logic u have , ud happily buy an ice cream truck with a larger engine or newer model , and think the ice cream tastes better(placebo at best) CUZ THE NUMBA IS HIGHER in the ad

Yeah, I hope those rumors aren't true.
I won't get an SGS2 if that is true..

souljaboy said:
nice job guys now we ****tin rite back at em
the usa speeds im talkin about were in houses in various phone reviews eg. real life numbers not standing on the street or in a metropolis
back to my point
14.4 Mbit/s HSDPA max speed
21 Mbit/s HSPA+ max speed
ur damn network is nowhere close to these , stop being obessed with new marketing abbreviations
by the logic u have , ud happily buy an ice cream truck with a larger engine or newer model , and think the ice cream tastes better(placebo at best) CUZ THE NUMBA IS HIGHER in the ad
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Proof or it didn't happen
Sent from my unicorn

Alex530 said:
Proof or it didn't happen
Sent from my unicorn
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ur post is the proof ... that ur brain never has advanced beyond the level of a 6 year old

Christ, you people seem to be getting rather worked up about how fast your connections are :-S

AdrianK said:
Christ, you people seem to be getting rather worked up about how fast your connections are :-S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm.. I agree
Altough I will ignore you all unless you have fibre optics speed jk

Related

About TMO's 4G

So today I was at the mall and I asked a TMO rep about 4G internet. I said, "How will you know if you have 4G?" The rep said "You will see a letter H". I then said, "How do you know if you're on 3G" He said, "You will also see a letter H". I got to admit that is pretty lame. So is there there 4G is basically a tweaked 3G?
Is it really TRUE 4G?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4G
marketing is all it is. but hspda+ is pretty fast.
crazifyngers said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4G
marketing is all it is. but hspda+ is pretty fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What kind of speeds are you getting on your 4G device?
Here's where it gets tricky. LTE Advanced and WiMax 2 are considered 4G (they don't even exist yet). As of yesterday, ITU (the ones who decide what "4G" is) admitted that WiMax and LTE can be called 4G. T-Mobile uses HSPA+, which is basically really fast 3G. However, even as an Evo owner (Sprint uses WiMax), I have to say I'd rather have LTE or at least HSPA+. Why? Because it's always on as long as you're in an area that has it. And on top of that, it doesn't rape your battery like WiMax does. Besides, you shouldn't by a phone based on how fast the internet is. By the phone for its features, build quality, etc. It's faster than what you already have and that's what matters. Plus, you won't be paying extra for the extra speed.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/18/itu-capitulates-admits-that-the-term-4g-could-apply-to-lte-w/
Product F(RED) said:
Here's where it gets tricky. LTE Advanced and WiMax 2 are considered 4G (they don't even exist yet). As of yesterday, ITU (the ones who decide what "4G" is) admitted that WiMax and LTE can be called 4G. T-Mobile uses HSPA+, which is basically really fast 3G. However, even as an Evo owner (Sprint uses WiMax), I have to say I'd rather have LTE or at least HSPA+. Why? Because it's always on as long as you're in an area that has it. And on top of that, it doesn't rape your battery like WiMax does. Besides, you shouldn't by a phone based on how fast the internet is. By the phone for its features, build quality, etc. It's faster than what you already have and that's what matters. Plus, you won't be paying extra for the extra speed.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/12/18/itu-capitulates-admits-that-the-term-4g-could-apply-to-lte-w/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you. Great run down!
well like the link says hspda+ is not 4g. none of the "4g" systems are really 4g it is all marketing. that being said on the nexus s which does not have hspda+ chip only a hspda chip here are my results. the top two are wifi results. oh and i'm in phoenix.
I don't get what all the furor is about. No one is bound by what the ITU says. At this point 4G just means "better than 3G." It's hard to fault T-Mo. They've got a network that's considerably faster than what has been normal 3G and is comparable to what Sprint calls 4G. From a business perspective there's no way they could surrender the field to Sprint just because of what the ITU and tech geeks say.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
crazifyngers said:
well like the link says hspda+ is not 4g. none of the "4g" systems are really 4g it is all marketing. that being said on the nexus s which does not have hspda+ chip only a hspda chip here are my results. the top two are wifi results. oh and i'm in phoenix.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, and like you said, that's without HSPA+. The highest I ever hit on WiMax was around 12 down, but then again I'm in NYC and I get full "4G" from my house (guess I'm by a WiMax access point). I'd be happy with those speeds you posted though. I do tether on occasion, but 99% of the time I don't need anything faster than that. Oh and another reason why HSPA+/LTE are better than WiMax is because LTE and HSPA+ are/are becoming global standards while WiMax is available in a few countries, though not on phones like in the US. Plus WiMax is basically longer-range Wifi which imo is pretty retarded for cellular use, especially considering the battery drain.
As for why I went to Sprint is another story. It's cheaper (or as cheap) as T-Mobile and you get free roaming on Verizon. I love GSM to death, but I'm a college student and I need to get as much as I can for as little as I can Plus the Evo's f*cking awesome, 4G or not.
I read that the consortium that manages all the standards came out yesterday and said that WiMax, advanced 3g tech(HSPA+) and LTE all classify as 4g
Yup, linked to it in my first post. They admitted they could be called 4G since we're so far off from the original requirements (1 Gbps I believe). What they described as 4G originally should really be 5 or 6G. Pretty steep requirements.
FastMhz said:
Is it really TRUE 4G?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No.
10char
zachthemaster said:
No.
10char
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
correction
YES
Now I kinda wish the Nexus S was 4G capable. ****, if it's no extra charge for extra speed. Why not?! Regardless, love the phone.
slowz3r said:
correction
YES
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im
be
cile
LOOK
zachthemaster said:
Im
be
cile
LOOK
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you miss the part where the international consortium that certifies the mobile broad band technology came out yesterday and said that Advanced 3G (HSPA+) LTE and Wimax are qualifying 4G tech
slowz3r said:
did you miss the part where the international consortium that certifies the mobile broad band technology came out yesterday and said that Advanced 3G (HSPA+) LTE and Wimax are qualifying 4G tech
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Link or it never happened.
zachthemaster said:
Link or it never happened.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.tmonews.com/2010/12/hspa-now-officially-4g-according-to-itu/
http://www.itu.int/net/pressoffice/press_releases/2010/48.aspx
slowz3r said:
http://www.tmonews.com/2010/12/hspa-now-officially-4g-according-to-itu/
http://www.itu.int/net/pressoffice/press_releases/2010/48.aspx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eh, **** man that's still sketchy, with true 4G you're supposed to get way faster speeds, but for now, touche.
zachthemaster said:
Eh, **** man that's still sketchy, with true 4G you're supposed to get way faster speeds, but for now, touche.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1GBs as a minimum for 4th gen tech, thats extremely high, im pretty sure they where all high when they thought of that number
LTE 4G in Germany
Germany will be the first country in the EU to deploy high speed, low latency, LTE technology using the 800 MHz digital divided spectrum. Vodafone is one of the first operators to start LTE networks in Germany. The technology should allow for average speeds of 50 Mbit/sec.

Whats the difference between Atrix and Atrix 4G?

International market is getting Atrix 3G, US is getting 4G. Is there any difference? As far as I know, both versions support HSPA+.
syl0n said:
International market is getting Atrix 3G, US is getting 4G. Is there any difference? As far as I know, both versions support HSPA+.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Largely terminology. If you mean HSPA+, then no, there's no difference. Someone has hinted that the Atrix will make it to other carriers. If it goes to Verizon, we could see a version that supports LTE. Then you'll have a difference. Until then, it's HSPA+ on various frequencies (assuming there will be a European version on a quirky frequency, and assuming it hits TMo).
Sent from my Sexy Nexy, courtesy of the fine developers of Tapatalk
There is no difference at all. In Europe they don't call HSPA+ 4G, so it's not called a 4G phone there.
It's kind of weird, it's probably because of some more restrictive laws outside the US where you can't call a cat a tiger (after all, HSPA+ is NOT 4G). Otherwise, they would surely market it the same way in Canada and Europe.
PuerkitoBio said:
It's kind of weird, it's probably because of some more restrictive laws outside the US where you can't call a cat a tiger (after all, HSPA+ is NOT 4G). Otherwise, they would surely market it the same way in Canada and Europe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The idea of US carriers calling HSPA+ 4G is that it is delivering 4G speeds using upgraded 3G technology. 14.4Mbps HSPA+ with AT&T is nearly on par with the LTE speeds we will see on Verizon initially. T-Mobile is cranking their HSPA+ up to 42Mbps or something similar. It will be some time before carriers can really flex LTE muscle, but for now there really won't be that huge of a speed difference, so all these carriers calling their data tech 4G is just marketing.
Besides, LTE is NOT 4G either by definition. LTE is more of a 3.5G technology, similar to HSPA+, but the cool thing with LTE is that over time it can be upgraded to approximately 300Mbps theoretical download speed, while HSPA+ can only be upgraded to approximately 84Mbps download speed.
LTE Advanced will be the first technically compliant 4G technology on the market, but we are still years off from seeing that in the real world.
So take everything you see about 4G as a grain of salt. Atrix 4G vs Atrix is just marketing lingo.
And when people want to say that the Droid Bionic is a real 4G device would technically be incorrect. So don't think your Atrix is in any way inferior to the Bionic (except maybe camera and screen size).
PuerkitoBio said:
It's kind of weird, it's probably because of some more restrictive laws outside the US where you can't call a cat a tiger (after all, HSPA+ is NOT 4G).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is now. Standards folks changed their minds, and as of last month or so current WiMax, current LTE, and HSPA+ are all 4G.
when i talked with my rep basically he said they were dropping the 4g just to make things easier. The phone is the same, just some people are still using the superfluous 4g tag.
Does this mean that we can buy a sim-free Atrix 4g from at&t, bring it to europe and use it with european sim cards?or any other gsm sim-cards around the world?
Po0yAn said:
Does this mean that we can buy a sim-free Atrix 4g from at&t, bring it to europe and use it with european sim cards?or any other gsm sim-cards around the world?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd really like to know that as well. Besides this the only thing preventing me from ordering an unlocked version as soon as such is available is the bootloader thing.
A_Kirsh said:
I'd really like to know that as well. Besides this the only thing preventing me from ordering an unlocked version as soon as such is available is the bootloader thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same here.thats why im considering galaxy s2 now. i have both moto milestone and galaxy s,the build quality of moto is way better.also my friends like the milestone build and look more,but the locked up bootloader really frustrated me.although there aren't much of great custom roms for galaxy s either,we haven't had a decent cyanogenmod rom around yet, after 8 month since galaxy s been released.
i like atrix more because of better build,higher resolution and tegra 2,but the damn bootloader and later release date along with slightly better specs for s2 like shipping with 2.3 and better camera is changing my desire.
not to mention that this time moto is using PenTile for it LCD and sami is using stripe matrix for its samoled+. thats another let down for atrix.
it was stupid from moto to change the lcd tech on atrix, stripe matrix looked great on milestone.
u can see the differences here:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4165/the-motorola-atrix-4g-preview/4
you can see im pretty confused here!if only the damn nexus s was shipped with a daul core cpu!
LockeCPM4 said:
The idea of US carriers calling HSPA+ 4G is that it is delivering 4G speeds using upgraded 3G technology. 14.4Mbps HSPA+ with AT&T is nearly on par with the LTE speeds we will see on Verizon initially. T-Mobile is cranking their HSPA+ up to 42Mbps or something similar. It will be some time before carriers can really flex LTE muscle, but for now there really won't be that huge of a speed difference, so all these carriers calling their data tech 4G is just marketing.
Besides, LTE is NOT 4G either by definition. LTE is more of a 3.5G technology, similar to HSPA+, but the cool thing with LTE is that over time it can be upgraded to approximately 300Mbps theoretical download speed, while HSPA+ can only be upgraded to approximately 84Mbps download speed.
LTE Advanced will be the first technically compliant 4G technology on the market, but we are still years off from seeing that in the real world.
So take everything you see about 4G as a grain of salt. Atrix 4G vs Atrix is just marketing lingo.
And when people want to say that the Droid Bionic is a real 4G device would technically be incorrect. So don't think your Atrix is in any way inferior to the Bionic (except maybe camera and screen size).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just thought I'd correct you. Tmobile has claimed they can reach speeds of up to 672mbps with their HSPA+ tech. Honestly with speeds like that is there any real need for LTE?
"Now we're seeing a chart of T-Mobile's 4G evolution on the HSPA+ technology path, starting with 21Mbps in 2010. We're seeing 28, 42, 84, 168, and 672Mbps bars here as we move through dual-carrier, MIMO, and so on."
http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/06/live-from-t-mobiles-ces-2011-press-event/
svengalis said:
"Now we're seeing a chart of T-Mobile's 4G evolution on the HSPA+ technology path, starting with 21Mbps in 2010. We're seeing 28, 42, 84, 168, and 672Mbps bars here as we move through dual-carrier, MIMO, and so on."
http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/06/live-from-t-mobiles-ces-2011-press-event/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is basically LTE. They will be switching to it eventually, and these technologies is what makes up most of it.
Just to make sure everyone's aware. Without a huge picocell/femtocell underlay, you will never see anything over 6-12 meg on an LTE network.
The difference between atrix 4g and atrix for europe could be regarding frequencies: 4g shold be 3g on frequencies 850/1900/2100 while european version 850/900/1900/2100. This should be not a problem because almost in all europe 3g works on 2100 Mhz frequency. What do you think about it?
mercuryzzz said:
The difference between atrix 4g and atrix for europe could be regarding frequencies: 4g shold be 3g on frequencies 850/1900/2100 while european version 850/900/1900/2100. This should be not a problem because almost in all europe 3g works on 2100 Mhz frequency. What do you think about it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since most 3G GSM operates in the 2100MHZ area nowadays, I don't this this is too much of a problem (if I'm wrong could someone please correct me?)
I'm now curious as to what exactly is the unlock procedure (sim-wise) of an att Atrix... Can anyone please explain (in detail) ?

4g

Hey guys just a question. I know rooting the Dell streak can get you on the hsdpa(or something like that) network but is that the 4G speed? If not is there a way right now to get 4G on the streak?
http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/17/2g-3g-4g-and-everything-in-between-an-engadget-wireless-prim/
with that in mind, what do you define as 4g? if you are referring to hspa+ or lte, im not sure, but if you are referring to the actual definition of 4g then i doubt it, but we have to wait for it to be invented first
rptw said:
http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/17/2g-3g-4g-and-everything-in-between-an-engadget-wireless-prim/
with that in mind, what do you define as 4g? if you are referring to hspa+ or lte, im not sure, but if you are referring to the actual definition of 4g then i doubt it, but we have to wait for it to be invented first
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was wondering when someone would do a write up of all that. I have yet to try AT&T's new 4G but I'm sure it's as fast as my rooted HTC Aria's HSPA+
You will not get 4g with the streak just 3.5g.
Sent from the Almighty Streak 1.7.0
4G is only the nick name of hspa, which already support hsdpa up to 10Mbps or more and also HSUPA up to 5.76Mbps. All those are 3G TECHNOLOGY as increasing slightly. All.the 3.5G and 4G are 3G tech which develope faster and faster.
3G comes with max speed 384kbps.
and then 3.5 come with HSDPA up to 7Mbps
then 4G comes with HSDPA upto 14Mbps and HSUPA 5.76Mbps
but truely no cellphone providr gave u that max speed as the costumers are sharing bandwidth.
To acces 4G u dont need dell.streak, u can use nokia 5800 which already support up to 4.6Mbps.
Its really depends on your device which is support hsdpa and hsupa , and also depends on your networks provider how fast they can give u. I believe that if u are inside the elevator u will have only gprs or even worst with no signal or sos symbol.
CMIIW ( correct me if im wrong )
I was actually wondering about this as well as AT&T is now advertising 4G "using our existing HSPA network" and after installing StreakDroid I'm seeing the H up top instead of a 3G. That said my speed is typically 2mbps - 3mbps which is somewhere around the 3.5 range mentioned above. Still much faster than I had on my iPhone (and sometimes faster than DSL when the network is having issues.)
I don't really care about this at all. I was just curious. Since it was out on the market now. Hopefully see you all soon on the STREAK side of life
AkumaMax said:
I don't really care about this at all. I was just curious. Since it was out on the market now. Hopefully see you all soon on the STREAK side of life
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The dell streak will never run on 4G speeds. The streak was not built to handle 4G. Sorry to break it to you.
Heck, I'd like it if at&t could at least offer 3g speeds.. I never even see 2m let alone 7s.. :-/

HTC EVO WiMAX ISW11H

Here is an interesting little bit of news for those in Japan.
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nb20110301a4.html
Looks like there will be an HTC EVO 4G clone for Japan under the au group.
With a maximum download speed of 40 Mbps and upload speed of 10 Mbps, the WiMAX network is several times faster than the mainstream 3G network. Currently, au's 3G network speed is 9.2 Mbps for downloading and 5.5 Mbps for uploading.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's some crazy speed.
Too bad no news of updates.
Yea. From what I understand 3G speeds can be so much faster than what we have here in the states. The fastest speed test on 3g for me was 2.5ish. But we could get more speed on 3g. But why would they give it to us? We gotta buy 4g phones to make them money.
Sent from my iPhone with the bigger Gee Bees.
I think It's also easier to provide incredible 3G speed to Japan than the US because of the size of the country.
BlackDave said:
I think It's also easier to provide incredible 3G speed to Japan than the US because of the size of the country.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also, their mobile, internet, and technology infrastructure is much better than ours. Take TV for example. Japan did away with analog TV years ago, and the US just got it done last year. Rather than limp along on older technology, they get ready for the future.
i am just going to leave this here...
http://viewstonews.com/index.php/sega-introduces-urine-controlled-video-game-in-japan/technology
ya thats about what i pull on 4g lol
this was so uncool and unnecessary

Nexus One Performs Like 4G

I did a test with my nexus one and G2, I don't know how but my Nexus still out performed my G2 Am I Glad To Be An Owner Of A Nexus1
Nexus One:
DL-4.46
UL-0.99
G2
DL-3.74
UL-1.37
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App
I live in a suburb of Boston and have great HSPA+ service. My N1 is getting on average during peak hours 4.2 DL and a constant 1.3 UL. I am very happy with those numbers. T-Mobile has a solid Network and blows away AT&T, Sprint and Verizon in my area. I live only 10 miles out of Boston and one mile away from RT 128. Suppose to be strong areas for all the Carriers.
Thank You T-Mobile.
Confused
If the T-mobile or Att network your using has an average of 7.2mbps or less, wont the Nexus One get the exact same download speed as any HSPA+ phone?
The only time an HSPA+ phone would ever "outpace" the N1 in download speed would be if the network is built up past 7.2mbps right? Like if the average speed was 10mbps THEN the HSPA+ would finally kick in but until 7.2mbps the Nexus One will keep up with any HSPA+ phone right?
I didn't know the G2 was LTE enabled
HSDPA+ is 3G btw.
I don't know, my thoughts were G2: better phone, better performance. LOL (Simpled Minded) Huh? It doesn't make sense to buy a 4G phone then! Forget 4G
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App
LOL at thinking those measly speeds are 4G!
4G speeds are more like 30MB/s down and 15MB/s up.
Look at some of the Verizon LTE (a TRUE 4G network) speed tests.
GldRush98 said:
LOL at thinking those measly speeds are 4G!
4G speeds are more like 30MB/s down and 15MB/s up.
Look at some of the Verizon LTE (a TRUE 4G network) speed tests.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well even Verizon's LTE network is still around 7-12 Mbit, not MB/sec... and no where near true "4G."
The ITU's newest standard now allows "evolved 3G technologies" such as HSPA+ to eventually qualify for "4G" nomenclature, but this is still quite some time from now, given that it's roughly 1/10 of the required speed for mobile applications. What's funny, though, is that T-Mobile's HSPA+ is generally faster than Sprint's WiMAX in many areas, despite the fact that under the old classification system WiMAX could eventually become 4G whereas HSPA+ could not.
IMT-Advanced basically became what the old "4G" classification was, including the 100 Mbit mobile and 1 Gbit fixed speed requirements, as well as goodies like VoIP and OFDMA.
Wow Professor Will, So All This Hype About 4G is probably for months or even years to come! I'm not buying another supposedly 4G Phone until its like an guarantee that I see a huge difference in speed!
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App
wtharden said:
Wow Professor Will, So All This Hype About 4G is probably for months or even years to come! I'm not buying another supposedly 4G Phone until its like an guarantee that I see a huge difference in speed!
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah pretty much, i thought it was common knowledge for all of us phone geeks. tmobile's 4g is nothing but 3G HSPA. and unless the towers have enough backhaul to support fast speeds, a 3G phone will perform like a 4G phone until the theoretical limits for each are hit. havent seen that happen anywhere yet in the USA that i can tell. its all gimmic marketing crap.
RogerPodacter said:
yeah pretty much, i thought it was common knowledge for all of us phone geeks. tmobile's 4g is nothing but 3G HSPA. and unless the towers have enough backhaul to support fast speeds, a 3G phone will perform like a 4G phone until the theoretical limits for each are hit. havent seen that happen anywhere yet in the USA that i can tell. its all gimmic marketing crap.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Call it what you want, I'm very happy with T-Mobile. In my area they are faster then all others. They have the best plans and prices blow all others away. I think if more people gave them a chance they would be very happy. Not to mention they support the Nexus One.
vinnyjr said:
Call it what you want, I'm very happy with T-Mobile. In my area they are faster then all others. They have the best plans and prices blow all others away. I think if more people gave them a chance they would be very happy. Not to mention they support the Nexus One.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 Also, very satisfied with TMobile in my area!
galaxys said:
+1 Also, very satisfied with TMobile in my area!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+2 dittos.
vinnyjr said:
Call it what you want, I'm very happy with T-Mobile. In my area they are faster then all others. They have the best plans and prices blow all others away. I think if more people gave them a chance they would be very happy. Not to mention they support the Nexus One.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm very impressed with t-mobile and give them all the credit in the world for what they've done with their data speeds. ATT is a joke when it comes to being a leader like that. They do nothing but follow the other carriers and react rather than set the standard. But I'm sad t-mobile started this fake 4g thing.
Extremely satisfied with my Nexus One on TMO. I'm roughly 20 miles north west from northeastern Philly and just like the other users have said T-Mobile has the best coverage in my area compared to Verizon and AT&T. My work phone is a Blackberry Tour running on Verizon's network and the network coverage blows compared to T-Mobile's in my area.
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA Premium App
Rogers in canada is crazy fast... It seems my upload is capped at 1mbit up but download speeds have gotten upwards of 4 even 5 mbit down!
Sent from my Google Phone

Categories

Resources