Database Users

[POLL] Which ROM yeilds the highest Quadrant score?

Please use the following template to report your scores:
SCORE: (Please don't bother posting if lower than 1400)
ROM: (Include Revision or Version Number)
RADIO: (Revision Number)
KERNAL: (Include Revision or Version Number)
CLOCK SPEED: (In Ghz)
COMMENTS: (This would be a good place to discuss any tweaks, patches, or other things that may have an effect on your score)
Thanks!

TylerD004 said:
Please use the following template to report your scores:
SCORE: (Please don't bother posting if lower than 1400)
ROM: (Include Revision or Version Number)
RADIO: (Revision Number)
KERNAL: (Include Revision or Version Number)
CLOCK SPEED: (In Ghz)
COMMENTS: (This would be a good place to discuss any tweaks, patches, or other things that may have an effect on your score)
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
useless..scores can be faked easily

ouikikazz said:
useless..scores can be faked easily
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to mention, my highest quadrant scores (1600ish) come from the ROM that feels the least smooth overall for me. I'm using virt 2.6 right now and I get around 1400 on the first pass and it is the smoothest (scrolling, previews, in general not lagging when I try to do something) sense ROM I have used. God knows I've used them all at one point or another.

i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.

ouikikazz said:
useless..scores can be faked easily
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In that case, please don't fake scores so that our community can work together to find the fastest ROM.

Regardless of quadrant score, Ruby is the quickest rom I've used, and I've tried them all.

bhazard451 said:
Regardless of quadrant score, Ruby is the quickest rom I've used, and I've tried them all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I happen to agree. Its blazing fast. Still needs some things for me to be able to switch over to it, but I wouldn't mind going full time on a vanilla ROM.
The smoothest sense ROM Ive used is Virtuous, but the more feature packed roms like SR and CM have more stuff than I need.

Besides being a pointless thread, why did you put this in Development? Reported.

larsrya8 said:
Besides being a pointless thread, why did you put this in Development? Reported.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because this is the place most people come to discuss ROMS.

why is this under development?

TylerD004 said:
Because this is the place most people come to discuss ROMS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Discuss the DEVELOPMENT of ROMs. This actually should go in Q&A. Your need for attention is trumped by the topic of the forum, IMO.

Crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Freakin hilarious!

Crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's too easy to call BS on this one.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App

crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
u2 godliest rom ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Crimton said:
i got a 2200 quadrant and 90 mflops(on the older version of linpack) running jdfroyo, and i was overclocked to 2ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My pentium II doesn't even score that high.
Sent from XDA App
Unrevoked Root and Sucked-off
2.0.5 Baseband
SkyRaider 3.0 Vanilla
#1 King Bad F*cking **** Kernel OC to 1.13

Why do people place so much emphasis on Quadrant scores? Sounds like you're trying to compensate for something...
I'm getting 1300ish and my phone feels very snappy and quick. This is on Virtuous 2.6 and using the custom Virtuous kernel running @ 998 mhz.
Sounds like people turned this into a pissing contest, just like 3DMark on PCs. The one with the highest score doesn't necessarily feel the best, nor is it the most reliable. If you want the highest quadrant score, mod your phone by having a liquid nitrogen cooled CPU and figure out how to OC that sucker by 100% or more. I'm sure you'll be the envy of all your friends, even though they will be the ones who are actually able to use their phones for what they were meant for.

I'm running Ruby 1.1.1 and I get around 1350 which is about 150 less than what I was getting with stock froyo with KingKernel 1 overclocked to 1.15, but Ruby runs smoother and faster for me which will always matter more than a dumb benchmark number

Running virtuous 2.6 with KingxKernel BFS #4 gets me 1637 @ 1.19GHz, one of my friend gets 1693.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

shabubu said:
Why do people place so much emphasis on Quadrant scores? Sounds like you're trying to compensate for something...
I'm getting 1300ish and my phone feels very snappy and quick. This is on Virtuous 2.6 and using the custom Virtuous kernel running @ 998 mhz.
Sounds like people turned this into a pissing contest, just like 3DMark on PCs. The one with the highest score doesn't necessarily feel the best, nor is it the most reliable. If you want the highest quadrant score, mod your phone by having a liquid nitrogen cooled CPU and figure out how to OC that sucker by 100% or more. I'm sure you'll be the envy of all your friends, even though they will be the ones who are actually able to use their phones for what they were meant for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This forum is inherently about tinkering. People who tinker like metrics. My 2400 winpoint on Homerun Baseball 3d is a pointless number too, but I still like making it higher
It's a fun stat that doesn't mean much, but it's still fun.

Did they move this thread I clicked General not development?
Droid Incredible General
Discussion about the Verizon HTC Droid Incredible (tips & tricks, etc)

Quadrant and Linpack scores

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My latest score ;-) Had a couple apps running in the background also.
Running bionix Final rom W/ King Klicks Kernel @ 1.2ghz
Ryans Lag Fix
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

Is The Nexus One CPU THAT Good?
BTW...Thats Awesome!!

Erickomen27 said:
Is The Nexus One CPU THAT Good?
BTW...Thats Awesome!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Nexus One has JIT which gives you a a major boost in CPU! JIT is only available on Android 2.2 devices.
SGS phones in the U.S. are only running 2.1 @ the moment. So when 2.2 comes around I'm sure 3000+ Quadrant scores and 30MLOPS will be possible.

player4lifeov said:
The Nexus One has JIT which gives you a a major boost in CPU! JIT is only available on Android 2.2 devices.
SGS phones in the U.S. are only running 2.1 @ the moment. So when 2.2 comes around I'm sure 3000+ Quadrant scores and 30MLOPS will be possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SGS with jit hits around 14.4 on linpack. Look it up though. The processors are different...linpack is optimized for the type of chip in the n1.
Sent from my Fusion powered Vibrant.

player4lifeov said:
The Nexus One has JIT which gives you a a major boost in CPU! JIT is only available on Android 2.2 devices.
SGS phones in the U.S. are only running 2.1 @ the moment. So when 2.2 comes around I'm sure 3000+ Quadrant scores and 30MLOPS will be possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I'm Running 2.2 Major Spped Overhaul But I'm Getting Like 13.7MFLOPS And 1030 Quadrant
Yes Running JIT
(Not Optimized)

player4lifeov said:
The Nexus One has JIT which gives you a a major boost in CPU! JIT is only available on Android 2.2 devices.
SGS phones in the U.S. are only running 2.1 @ the moment. So when 2.2 comes around I'm sure 3000+ Quadrant scores and 30MLOPS will be possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
from what i have read, there are 2 problems with benchmark scores.
1. they favor the processors other then hummingbird (meaning they give false high numbers to other devices and false low numbers to hummingbird processors)
2. bench marks dont always translate into real world/daily use performance of the phone
So if it feels fast and great, who cares what your bench marks are

Do you see that huge Green Part of your score, yup. It is inflating your score by almost 800 points on quandrant.

Vibrant + xda app

Vibrant + xda app
Wtf.
Won't upload my score. Tells me wrong file format ....how? Its PNG.

No lag fix. Stock w/ update jl6
Vibrant + xda app

j56bp said:
No lag fix. Stock w/ update jl6
Vibrant + xda app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice!
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

PaiPiePia said:
Do you see that huge Green Part of your score, yup. It is inflating your score by almost 800 points on quandrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, it is isn't it? So I guess that's my way off falsifying information through this benchmark. Since the benchmark favors snap dragon cpu. ;~}
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

@jb56- Are you running an optimized kernel? That's a really good score
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

My Linpack Is Number One On The SGS Devices

It's not the benchmark app, its Hummingbird not using the full potential of JIT
kboater said:
from what i have read, there are 2 problems with benchmark scores.
1. they favor the processors other then hummingbird (meaning they give false high numbers to other devices and false low numbers to hummingbird processors)
2. bench marks dont always translate into real world/daily use performance of the phone
So if it feels fast and great, who cares what your bench marks are
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't agree with your statements. When strictly running Eclair 2.1, how come almost every benchmark showed that SGS was the fastest 2.1 phone around?
Then throw in Froyo 2.2, and the Dalvik JIT compiler, and suddenly the SGS is no longer the fastest phone.
So if these benchmark apps favor chips other than Hummingbird, how come they showed SGS was the fastest 2.1 phone? Are you saying all these benchmark developers have a conspiracy to show SGS as the fastest 2.1 phone, but the slowest 2.2 phone?
Come on, it's not the benchmarks. IT is the actual Hummingbird CPU being UNABLE to take advantage of the Dalvik JIT compiler.
The benchmarks are pretty accurate, and they are showing that Hummingbird is unable to take advantage of the huge performance gains of Dalvik JIT.
If your argument was to be accurate, then all benchmarks should have favored non hummingbird CPU's running 2.1 also.
I just don't buy it, it's not the benchmark, its Hummingbird not utilizing JIT while other CPU's like Scorpion do.

player4lifeov said:
The Nexus One has JIT which gives you a a major boost in CPU! JIT is only available on Android 2.2 devices.
SGS phones in the U.S. are only running 2.1 @ the moment. So when 2.2 comes around I'm sure 3000+ Quadrant scores and 30MLOPS will be possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually SGS phones that are already running 2.2, and SGS Tablets running Froyo 2.2 have not been able to reach 30MFLOPS. The Hummingbird will NOT gain the huge cpu performance gains from 2.2 Dalvik JIT compiler. Unfortunate but seems to be true.

Just got these results with Eugene's Froyo rom JPA Mancnut R2 with Kernel #69

qreffie said:
Just got these results with Eugene's Froyo rom JPA Mancnut R2 with Kernel #69
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ummm......that's an ok Linpack score I guess
~SB

PaiPiePia said:
Do you see that huge Green Part of your score, yup. It is inflating your score by almost 800 points on quandrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's because it's lag fixed.

Ji6 core kernel and oclf

SmartBench scores on FroYo EB13

My current smart bench scores are
1067
2374
on 2.2
They were
1100
2700
on 2.1.
Anyone else getting bad scores?
I can't search from my phone, so if there's another thread like this please lead me there.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

bump
10char

Those numbers don't exactly mean much... it's such a small variance that I wouldn't worry about it.

After going the ext4 kernel my scores are a little higher.
I think once we get cleaner roms scores will start to go up.

On stock EB13 I got:
1083
2438
That doesn't really seem that bad to me.

EB13 running Genocide 1.2oc kernel, rfs:
1236/2788

Smart Bench Scores RFS: OC 1.2 Kernel Genocide=
1258/2890

Any downfall to that kernel?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

no downfall i can see SB 1355/3037 ext4 geno kern

Scores on a phone!!!!!!! What's the point? Reminds me of the nerdy kid at school modifying his gaming laptop to brag about scores. A laptop I understand, a phone? Who cares.

I care.
shook187 said:
Scores on a phone!!!!!!! What's the point? Reminds me of the nerdy kid at school modifying his gaming laptop to brag about scores. A laptop I understand, a phone? Who cares.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Phones ARE computers these days. Fast computers rock. Why do you make the comparison to a laptop and state that a "phone" is anything less. Phone is just a word to describe the original function of these micro-devices. They are 1% phone and 99% other-than-phone. Broaden your horizon(s).

Tirregius said:
Phones ARE computers these days. Fast computers rock. Why do you make the comparison to a laptop and state that a "phone" is anything less. Phone is just a word to describe the original function of these micro-devices. They are 1% phone and 99% other-than-phone. Broaden your horizon(s).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
These scores do have a meaning to the people who run the tests. I mean, that's like asking, "why do you race your car at the drag strip?" Easy! To see how my car ranks against others. I can see how my mods affects my car(or in this case, smartphone)'s performance. It doesn't matter if it's noticeable to the user.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

BWFBezerk said:
My current smart bench scores are
1067
2374
on 2.2
They were
1100
2700
on 2.1.
Anyone else getting bad scores?
I can't search from my phone, so if there's another thread like this please lead me there.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not surprising when you see the real world performance of 2.1 vs 2.2 on the Epic. 2.1 was smoother, faster and all around more stable. Don't believe me? One simple test, pull down the notification bar on 2.1 and 2.2. When compared, you see that on 2.2 it is super choppy in comparison to the perfect smoothness of 2.1. I hate to say this...

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

Eazail70x7 said:
Not surprising when you see the real world performance of 2.1 vs 2.2 on the Epic. 2.1 was smoother, faster and all around more stable. Don't believe me? One simple test, pull down the notification bar on 2.1 and 2.2. When compared, you see that on 2.2 it is super choppy in comparison to the perfect smoothness of 2.1. I hate to say this...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Either your on crack or something is messed up with your phone. I went back to eclair for a minute before I went to eb13 there is no difference in the pulldown. Maybe you have 15 apps running...........
Epic 4g

1396/3100
Genocide OC kernel @ 1200MHz running Midnight ROM 4.0
To the above poster, how did you get EB13 to 1300MHz?

hehehe Dorks!! My E-penis is bigger then your E-penis... hehehehahahahaa
I don't put much stock in benchmarks, and have yet to waste my time running them. I worry about how my phone performs when I am using it. Working pretty good I might Add, Nebula 1.07 with Genocide kernel.. Can't compare my E-Penis because as I said, I haven't measured it.

socos25 said:
hehehe Dorks!! My E-penis is bigger then your E-penis... hehehehahahahaa
I don't put much stock in benchmarks, and have yet to waste my time running them. I worry about how my phone performs when I am using it. Working pretty good I might Add, Nebula 1.07 with Genocide kernel.. Can't compare my E-Penis because as I said, I haven't measured it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
seriously are you going through each forum and posting some bs like this. quit trolling

Smartbench 2010: 1337/3041 EB13 - Genocide v0.1a 1.2GHZ OC
Stock EB13 (was) 1035/2285
To the troll on this thread:
The reason we have great software and great devices that are fast and reliable is because of people like those that are here pushing it to the limit. Make no mistake - if you like tech you should just let the geeks do there thing and you just enjoy the fruits of their work.

Highest Galaxy S benchmark ever.

Here, I prove that synthetic benchmarks fail.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

My god.... How the heck did you do it?

Benchmarks are becoming less and less meaningful as people customize and mod their systems more and more.
If I could find a USB port on a cocker spaniel and install Android on it, I could tweak the poor little guy to get 2500 on Quadrant if I really wanted to (and if I didn't have to give the dog back afterwards).

The highest my SGS go is 1517 Quadrant. How you guys mannaged to get 2000 and above.
Using Darky 9.5, dark core 1.4

I got 3147 quadrant with miui rc4 and oc to 1300MHz.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

progene81 said:
The highest my SGS go is 1517 Quadrant. How you guys mannaged to get 2000 and above.
Using Darky 9.5, dark core 1.4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so called lag fix for start, and some other tweaks including OC.
But lag fix itself gives a huge boost in quadrant.
I do agree synthetic benchmarks suck especially concerning phones since there are many chips, and many other optimizations for particular CPUs, and they're not equal in either implementation or HW is so much different that comparisons are pointless.
For instance snapdragon might lack with raw power, and our hummingbird is better, but when it comes to SIMD instruction ALUs snapdragon wins + quadrant's optimization for snapdragon et viola...

rschenck said:
Benchmarks are becoming less and less meaningful as people customize and mod their systems more and more.
If I could find a USB port on a cocker spaniel and install Android on it, I could tweak the poor little guy to get 2500 on Quadrant if I really wanted to (and if I didn't have to give the dog back afterwards).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kinda like this?:

theduckking said:
Kinda like this?:
View attachment 565756
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly, but with a dorsal fin and ramjets.

rschenck said:
Exactly, but with a dorsal fin and ramjets.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry, that's the turbo ARDog (Android Ready Dog) I got. If you want to customize it further you can have mine, PM me with your address if you're interested so I can organize the shipment (or well, fuell and program the GPS of the ARDog, it can fly so why not utilize it^^)

theduckking said:
sorry, that's the turbo ARDog (Android Ready Dog) I got. If you want to customize it further you can have mine, PM me with your address if you're interested so I can organize the shipment (or well, fuell and program the GPS of the ARDog, it can fly so why not utilize it^^)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't there an App for that?

I made this score

Using GingerCriskelo V27 and CF-Root 3.0
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App

My score:
+ The feeling of a pretty darn fast ROM
Of course the usage was pretty low over the weekend but still^^

Pretty easy to get 4500-4600 scores on Quadrant with CM7 and a few kernel/system tweaks..

So which tweaks did u set?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App

Tk-Glitch said:
Pretty easy to get 4500-4600 scores on Quadrant with CM7 and a few kernel/system tweaks..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you 've overclocked to 1200 MHz or still Using 1000?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App

w7nt3rmut3 said:
So which tweaks did u set?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1 - Use a RAMdisk for Quadrant storage;
2 - Use old graphics driver from NS;
3 - Overclock.
Overclocking the bus will lead to faster RAM, so faster I/O score from the RAMdisk.
w7nt3rmut3 said:
So you 've overclocked to 1200 MHz or still Using 1000?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, 1.2GHz. Sorry^^.
At 1GHz, ~4000.
And with 1.4GHz, 4800-4900.
1.5GHz here :
Now 1.4GHz only, but with a faster bus speed, resulting in a boost on I/O and memory scores :
EDIT : Added *lololz* screenshot.
EDIT2 : Replaced *lololz* screenshot by a 1.5GHz one for even more LULZ.
EDIT3 : Added faster bus speed to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.

edited
10 chars

coldflid said:
Photoshop...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely not. Quadrant is just very easy to fool on the I/O score, as I said : with a ramdisk.
The normal I/O score on CM7 is ~1300, resulting in about 3000 final score @ 1.5GHz. Everyone here with an i9000 can have ~4900 with a light CM7 and 1.4GHz OC using a RAMdisk. It's a dirty hack for sure.
If you take the I/O score away, all the others are genuine. In fact, except the CPU score, they are all higher @ 1.4GHz (because of a faster bus frequency).
If my phone was stable at a higher bus, 5200-5300 should be possible at 1.5GHz, and even more at 1.6GHz (unstable for now on my device until I find a way to stabilize it).

Tk-Glitch said:
Absolutely not. Quadrant is just very easy to fool on the I/O score, as I said : with a ramdisk.
The normal I/O score on CM7 is ~1300, resulting in about 3000 final score @ 1.5GHz. Everyone here with an i9000 can have ~4900 with a light CM7 and 1.4GHz OC using a RAMdisk. It's a dirty hack for sure.
If you take the I/O score away, all the others are genuine. In fact, except the CPU score, they are all higher @ 1.4GHz (because of a faster bus frequency).
If my phone was stable at a higher bus, 5200-5300 should be possible at 1.5GHz, and even more at 1.6GHz (unstable for now on my device until I find a way to stabilize it).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, i didn't mean yours, i totally believe yours, i meant the one on the first post, and now that i look it more closely it doesn't seem fake.
Sorry

Quadrant Scores

Just wondering what other peoples epic can pull off in quadrant so I guess post a screenshot below and tell us what your running.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
me personally am running Legendary ROM 3.3 w/ IAP Rebirth kernel.
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<

dunno how to capture screen.. mine is 2516.
im on acs ics v4 ei22
no O/C
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk

Screenshot it worked for me and for overclock you use voltage control if you'd like to.
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<

Score: 2665
SyndicateROM Frozen 1.2
Genocide Kernel 2.0
OC 1400 Mhz

I an quite happy with my score.
1.4 GHz.
My daily driver OC is 1.2 and that gets me a 3292.
ACS ICS EI22 V2.
Send from my SPH-D700 (Samsung Epic 4G)

Quadrant is pointless for measuring real world performance.. but here is my highest:
1.6ghz on ACS Bamboozle (EF02)

Yeah I know quadrant isn't real world performance but it makes you feel good inside haahah. Btw that's a sick score care to share some specifics with me? Kernel tweaks etc.?
tbob18 said:
Quadrant is pointless for measuring real world performance.. but here is my highest:
1.6ghz on ACS Bamboozle (EF02)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<

Biggoron said:
Yeah I know quadrant isn't real world performance but it makes you feel good inside haahah. Btw that's a sick score care to share some specifics with me? Kernel tweaks etc.?
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha, yeah. It can be fun, reminds me of my 3Dmark days.
Nothing special, the score is from a few months ago.. I froze most of the services and closed everything (about 130mb ram used in task manager)
I was using Tegrak to OC. Settings were 1600mhz, 1400mv core, and 1125mv internal.
Beware, running your phone at these kind of voltages is dangerous and could kill your phone. At 1.6ghz it was not completely stable and would freeze after about 10-15min.

Yeah I can imagine mine barerly handles 1.4 and likes to freeze just running this app every 30 mins or so. Any scripts or anything if not man could only imagine if you ran the v6 script mine runs at around 120mb of ram in task manager 70 in the running services.
tbob18 said:
Ha, yeah. It can be fun, reminds me of my 3Dmark days.
Nothing special, the score is from a few months ago.. I froze most of the services and closed everything (about 130mb ram used in task manager)
I was using Tegrak to OC. Settings were 1600mhz, 1400mv core, and 1125mv internal.
Beware, running your phone at these kind of voltages is dangerous and could kill your phone. At 1.6ghz it was not completely stable and would freeze after about 10-15min.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<

Nice scores with the overclocks, too bad they are boosted with quadrant scripts.
Get pro and see how inflated I/O performance is.
I wish devs would stop cheating.

Biggoron said:
Yeah I know quadrant isn't real world performance but it makes you feel good inside haahah. Btw that's a sick score care to share some specifics with me? Kernel tweaks etc.?
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
also its good for comparing e-pen1s' =D

From what other sections on XDA have told me, they've said quadrant scores mean nothing. I do believe the benchmark isn't quite accurate.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

MikeEx said:
Nice scores with the overclocks, too bad they are boosted with quadrant scripts.
Get pro and see how inflated I/O performance is.
I wish devs would stop cheating.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, that's how it goes. Smartbench seems to be more accurate, but it is still a synthetic benchmark.

Biggoron said:
Screenshot it worked for me and for overclock you use voltage control if you'd like to.
Sent From my 1.4Ghz V6'd Legendary Epic >-<
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I tried O/C it now. I'll post the screenshot later when i get back home.

I got 3603 with a fresh install of StarskyROM 1.4, only tegrak (1.3 Ghz) and quadrant installed. It promptly froze up 2 minutes later. I generally get ~2500 with no O/C on that ROM.

A noobs score. Don't be too harsh!
My quadrant score using legendary rom beta 3.3 on the nubernal+ kernal (EI22) with ICS theme running Go Launcher Ex.
My score is far lower than everyone elses but give me time. I'm still a noob (god that puts a bad taste in my mouth) lol!

Hard to see I know. My screenshot app was working great until yesterday... just over 4000... 4083 I believe
Era legendary rom 4.0.1 overclocked to 1.44 ghz using samurai 1.4 kernel...
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk

My phone will only support 1.252 or below, but my highest was in the 3800's, with Legendary and IAP

New highest 4504 at 1.5 Ghz
Sent from my OG Epic