Additional thickness for the slider? - Epic 4G General

Has anyone seen the specs comparing the thickness of the Epic to the other Galaxy phones? I'm just wondering how much the keyboard adds.
Thanks!

I read 4mm.
edit: Actually that's not right. Its 4mm larger than the evo. Sorry.
Remember that the 4g radio is also probably adding some size to the phone.

Size: Dimensions: 4.9 inches 2.54 inches x 0.56 inches (124.8 mm x 64.6 mm x 14.2 mm) (LxWxT)
Weight: 5.46 ounces (155 grams)
versus
SIZE Dimensions 122.4 x 64.2 x 9.9 mm
Weight 119 g
So about an extra 4mm for the keyboard, and 35 grams.
Not terrible, and it is still in line with other smartphones, but if you want a 4" display and a landscape slider, you have to pay for it somehow.

drizek said:
Size: Dimensions: 4.9 inches 2.54 inches x 0.56 inches (124.8 mm x 64.6 mm x 14.2 mm) (LxWxT)
Weight: 5.46 ounces (155 grams)
versus
SIZE Dimensions 122.4 x 64.2 x 9.9 mm
Weight 119 g
So about an extra 4mm for the keyboard, and 35 grams.
Not terrible, and it is still in line with other smartphones, but if you want a 4" display and a landscape slider, you have to pay for it somehow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. Just wondering how it compares to my old Tilt2.

dc41 said:
Agreed. Just wondering how it compares to my old Tilt2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tilt2 dimensions:
116 x 59.2 x 17.3 mm. Weight, 178.5 g

Related

What size is it? Conflicting reports!

Please could someone categorically say what dimensions the Universal has.
I have seen two sets of varying dimensions. Which ones are correct?
http://www.eprice.com.tw/news/?news_id=2913
http://www.expansys.com/product.asp?code=125564
ONE: MM (Inches) Length: 127.7 (5.03) Width: 81.0 (3.19) Depth: 25.0 (0.98) (That is THICK!)
TWO: MM (Inches) Length: 131.6 (5.18) Width: 79.0 (3.11) Depth: 21.6 (0.85)
Two Reports of Weight: g. (oz.): 270.0 (9.52) or 210.0 (7.41)
Also, anybody have some close-up size comparison pics with a Himalaya or Blue Angel, in particular, thickness?
Thanks.
Squuiid said:
Please could someone categorically say what dimensions the Universal has.
I have seen two sets of varying dimensions. Which ones are correct?
http://www.eprice.com.tw/news/?news_id=2913
http://www.expansys.com/product.asp?code=125564
ONE: MM (Inches) Length: 127.7 (5.03) Width: 81.0 (3.19) Depth: 25.0 (0.98) (That is THICK!)
TWO: MM (Inches) Length: 131.6 (5.18) Width: 79.0 (3.11) Depth: 21.6 (0.85)
Two Reports of Weight: g. (oz.): 270.0 (9.52) or 210.0 (7.41)
Also, anybody have some close-up size comparison pics with a Himalaya or Blue Angel, in particular, thickness?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK - here's what happened.
Official specs were released by HTC - and propogated by T-mobile. These gave the dimensions as 131.6 x 79 x 21.6 mm and a weight of 210g.
Later these specs were revised and now T-mobile, Orange and O2 all give the dimensions as 127.7 x 81 x 25 mm.
An O2 Powerpoint presentation was leaked that gave the weight as 270g. Now, however, O2, T-mobile and Orange all give the weight as 285g.
Until someone actually measures and weighs it in a review, therefore it is:
127.7 x 81 x 25 mm and 285g according to all trustworthy official sources.
The full known specs are given in the VGA Comparison page linked in my sig at the bottom of my post.
Nope, I've just measured mine and it is:
TWO: MM (Inches) Length: 131.6 (5.18) Width: 79.0 (3.11) Depth: 21.6 (0.85)
aadvark said:
Nope, I've just measured mine and it is:
TWO: MM (Inches) Length: 131.6 (5.18) Width: 79.0 (3.11) Depth: 21.6 (0.85)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That woud make the original specs provided by HTC correct (in terms of dimensions at least). Which makes one wonder where they got the second set of specs from?
Not sure if this site was posted in the past but here is a comparison of the Universal.
http://www.windowsmobile.no/modules...ame=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php
JW
Not sure if this site was posted in the past but here is a comparison of the Universal.
http://www.windowsmobile.no/modules...ame=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php
JW
Thanks buddy! Just what I was after.
Looks pretty damn big! :shock:
Think my Himalaya is the max size I will go for in a phone.
The Universal looks too THICK.
I agree. I'm waiting for the Wizard so see how big that is. If I couldn't cope with that no way I'd have a Universal, especially at the price it is.
Here are the images of the Wizard. I agree it looks better as far as size but the processor scares me.
http://www.windowsmobile.no/modules...e=article&sid=443&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
OMG it looks HUGE ! i think they have made a mistake with this one, Good specs but i think its far too big to be practical.
I Own an XDA 2i and that is deffo the biggest phone i have ever had, i have just got used to the size in fact, so there is no way i would go bigger.
On a good note though ... the Wizard looks really interesting, i like the small size of that, more my cup of tea lol, we'll just have to see what the processor performs like
Noooooooo!
i-mate are reporting it as being:
Dimension (Typical): 81mm x 127.7mm x 25mm
http://www.clubimate.com/t-JASJAR_technical.aspx
Can it really be that big/fat?
I thought we had established it as being 21.6mm

Screen dimensions

Can someone please tell me what the actual dimensions (h x w) are for the screen on the Ameo/Advantage/Athena?
Thanks!
Was my question that tough? Or too elementary?
5" Diagonal, 80x100mm
Thank you zoharbl. The 5 inches I knew. It was the 80 x 100 (3.15" x 3.94"), that I was after. To me that is much more usable than the 1.57" x 3.54" of the E90.

[Q] Dimensions of the Display...?

I know it's got a 7" display, but what's the exact dimensions (height x length) of the display...?
Thx.
Nevermind found an answer...
http://bookclubs.barnesandnoble.com...-are-the-actual-screen-dimensions/td-p/736077
The screen itself is 6.25 x 3.75 approximately.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@ 169ppi 1024x600 = 3.55x6.059 inch
http://www.barnesandnoble.com/nookcolor/features/techspecs/index.asp?cds2Pid=35607
----edit----
i did the sizing in photoshop.
thx.......

Note 2 Vs Note 1

This may or may not get merged with the other thread.
But given how the other thread is mostly rumors or wishlists, I thought it'd be nice to have a 'real' thread.
(putting this in a code block so it doesn't kill my columns)
Code:
Differences:
Note 2 Note 1 Comments
size: 151.1 x 80.5 x 9.4mm 146.9 x 83 x 9.7 mm 4.2mm longer (ow)
2.5mm narrower
.3 mm thinner
RAM 2G 1G 1G more
weight: 180g 178g 2 grams heavier
battery: 3100mah 2500 mah 24% larger battery
CPU 1.6 Ghz Quad A9 1.4 Ghz Dual A9
memory 12,32,64 GB 12,32 gig 64 gig option
NFC Yes No
BT 4.0 3.0
Screen: 5.55" 5.3"
Pixels: 1280x720 1280x800
aspect: 16:9 16:10
DPI 264.5 285 7.2% less dpi (calced)
os JB GB
Glass: Gorilla Glass 2 Gorilla Glass 1
New things:
S-pen is different: thicker, rubberized tip.
Note can detect if you remove the s-pen, and can trigger apps/notifications when this happens.
Same:
GPU Mali-400MP
No 1700 support in either international brands
Anything I left out?
I can't find any official confirmation of an LED notification light on the Note 2.
Anyone seen it listed, or seen it go off in a video?
Nothing lost as far as I can tell, except for the pixel count.
- Frank
Thread Closed​
I think we have enough note 2 threads.​

The Dream Smartphone - Specs

Okay, so I came across this article about the dream smartphone. Basically, it lists all the specs a dream smartphone of 2014 will have.
The Dream Smartphone Specifications:
Display (Screen): 5.2-inch AMOLED 1080 x 1920 pixels (424 ppi)
Camera: 16 MP, 5312 x 2988 pixels, f/2.2, OIS, iPhone image processing (5 MP Front)
Performance: Snapdragon 810 (8core, 64bit), Adreno 430, 3 GB of Ram
Battery: 3500 mAh with Motorola Turbo Charging
Speakers: Dual Front-facing stereo speakers
Design: 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.37 inch (146.4 x 70.6 x 9.4 mm)
Operating System: Android 5.0 Lollipop
I personally would go for a bigger display with the same dimensions if possible. Bigger 4000mAh battery would be nice too.
Source
What are your dream specs for a smartphone?

Categories

Resources